IR 05000315/1986038

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Addendum to Insp Repts 50-315/86-38 & 50-316/86-38,providing Criteria for Comparing Results of Capability Tests & Verification Measurements
ML20207R192
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 03/03/1987
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20207R036 List:
References
50-315-86-38, 50-316-86-38, NUDOCS 8703120004
Download: ML20207R192 (2)


Text

g 4;

,

.sy

.

i

..

TABLE 2

U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT CONFIRMATORY MEASUREMENTS PROGRAM FACILITY: D C COOK FOR THE 4 QUARTER OF 1986-


NRC-------


LICENSEE----

---LICENSEE:NRC----

SAMPLE ISOTOPE RESULT ERROR RESULT ERROR RATIO RES T-L WASTE G BETA 1.3E-03 4.OE-05 1.6E-03 2.OE-05 1.2E 00 3.2E 01 A

H-3 3.1E-02 4.OE-04 2.8E-02 1.OE-04 9.3E-01 7.6E 01 A

T TEST RESULTS:

A= AGREEMENT D= DISAGREEMENT c= CRITERIA RELAXED

, N=NO OOMPARISON

.

8703120004 870303 PDR ADOCK 05000 15

o

-

.~

..

._

__

, _ _ _

_

_

_ _

_

_ _.

_ _

.-

y s..*

\\L:

.

.-

ATTACHMENT 1

,

i CRITERIA FOR COMPARING ANALYTICAL MEASUREMENTS

'

This attachment provides criteria for comparing results of capability tests and verification measurements.

The criteria are based on an empirical relationship which combines prior experience and the accuracy needs of this

'

program.

In these criteria, the judgment limits are va table in relation to the comparison of the NRC's value to its associated one sigma uncertainty. As that ratio, referred to in this program as " Resolution", increases, the acceptability of a licensee's measurement should be more selective.

Conversely, poorer agreement should be considered acceptable as the resolution decreases.

The values in the ratio criteria may be rounded to fewer significant figures reported by the NRC Reference Laboratory, unless such rounding will result in a narrowed category of acceptance.

<

RESOLUTION RATIO = LICENSEE VALUE/NRC REFERENCE VALUE

.

Agreement

!

<4 0.4 - 2.5 4-

0.5 - 2.0 l

-

l 8-

0.6 - 1.66 16 - 50 0.75 - 1.33 51 - 200 0.80 - 1.25

-

200 -

0.85 - 1.18

,

Some discrepancies may result from the use of different equipment, techniques,

'

!

and for some specific nuclides.

These may be factored into the acceptance l

criteria and identified on the data sheet.

-

.

%

.

l

---k--wwwm ~ mww


m mm