ML20136D872

Submits List of Barriers Which Failed During St Lucie Pig Inoperability

ML20136D872
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	04/10/1996
From:	Long R NRC
To:	Landis K, Mark Miller NRC
Shared Package
ML17229A261	List: IR 05000335/1994009 IR 05000335/1995015 IR 05000335/1996011 L-81-415, Informs That Staff Believes That NRC Interpretation of Term Directly Supervised Counterproductive ML20136C421 ML20136C664 ML20136C714 ML20136C755 ML20136C800 ML20136C820 ML20136C839 ML20136C941 ML20136D435 ML20136D456 ML20136D476 ML20136D508 ML20136D630 ML20136D855 ML20136D872 ML20136D892 ML20136D917 ML20136D944 ML20136D958 ML20136E025 ML20136E234 ML20136E255 ML20136E271 ML20136E283 ML20136E301 ML20136E307 ML20136E360 ML20136E364 ML20136E377 ML20136E387 ML20136E390 ML20136E396 ML20136E402 ML20136E448 ML20136E454 ML20136E464 ML20136E469 ML20136E484 ML20136E491 ML20136E539 ML20136E546 ML20136E564 ML20136E569 ML20136E579 ML20136E595 ML20136E608 ... further results
References
FOIA-96-485 EA-96-127, NUDOCS 9703130048
Download: ML20136D872 (1)

Text

.

N(t l i

April 10, 1996 NOTE TO: Kerry Landis, Mark Miller i FROM: Rebecca Long  !

SUBJECT:

EA 96-127: St. Lucie PIG Inoperability The following is my list of ' barriers" which failed in this event, transcribed from my enforement panel notes for purposes of legibility (in other words, I  !

don't think my notes would fax to Mark legibly). My original notes can be '

found in the EICS case file.

The HP technician failed to have the procedure in hand as required Te HP technician failed to properly reposition the valve The operators failed to report the out-of-spec surveillance data The SR0s didn't perform an adequate review of the surveillance data The procedure for hahdling out-of-spec surveillance data was ,

inadeuqate, in that it specified use of hard copy rather than use of hand-help computers The flow indicator alarm appeared to have the wron~g setpoint i As a result of these failures:

TS Violation for mode change while LC0 applied Following mode change, failed to comply with action statement (See ,

LER)

Inadequacies in licensee corrective action:

Did not counsel the operators, only the HP technician Did not review logs for other examples of data outside of acceptance criteria but not identified and addressed  ;

Did not address potential generic issue of other possible failure to declare equipment inoperable during tests such as this (this one was identified by residents and documents in IR and EAW)

Points which give this event extra regulatory significance:

Repeat of other violations (escalated issues?), which would be possible grounds for escalating this issue The general ongoing theme of procedural adherence problems The fact that several different crews did the same thing.

I hope this helps. I'll fax it to Mark.

cc: Bruno Uryc 9703130048 970306 9 PDR FOIA BINDER 96-485 PDR ,