ML20127M985
Text
le h
6' c::e:
R
'/
UNITED STATES
' i Y ',. c. "i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7
p WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%, *... /
Mr. Gregory J. Ogeka, Chief Administrative Branch Brookhaven Area Office U. S. Department of Energy Upton, New York 11973
Dear Mr. Ogeka:
Subject:
BNL Technical Assistance to the Division of Engineering, HRR, NRC "Probabilistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structure" (FIN No. A3721)
Th~iDetter is a request for a proposal from the Brookhaven Natio$k Laboratory to provide technical assistance to the Division of Engineering.
The Statement of Work in Enclosure 1 details the required work and should be used as the basis for preparing a proposal for submission to this office.
Standard terms and conditions for NRC work, as provided in the DOE /NRC Memorandum of Understanding of February 24, 1978 and described in NRC Manual Chapter 1102, apply to this effort.
If a portion of this i
work is to be subcentracted out, we require that BNL have a professional assigned to the contract who is qualified to defend the results.
- Alco, approval of the subcontractor by me is required in writing prior to initiation of any subcontracted effort.
The proposal should contain as a minimum the information set forth in Enclosure 2 and should be submitted in six copies in the format of the Statement of Work to:
Chester Poslusny Program Assistant Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washi~gton, D.C.
20555 n
Work under this program is not anticipated to be classified, but it may concern proprietary information that is provided in vendor topicai reports and should be handled in accordance with the Rules of Practice to CFR 2.790.
This request for proposal is not an authorization to start work.
s Authorization to commence work becomes effective upon Brookhaven Operations Office acceptance of an appropriately executed NRC Form 173, Standard Order for COE Work.
8505230409 841002 PDR FOIA SHOLLYB4-243 PDR 4
4
)
y m
1 I*r. Gregory J. Ogeka
- 2*-
)
If you have any questions about this request, please contact l'r. C. Poslutny on FT5 492-7057 Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely.
l
/
Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering Office of fluclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
1.
Statement of Work 2.
Proposal Content Distributicn cc:
R. Barber, HQ-DOE D kshi l
W. Kato, Bf!L h
H. Grahn, BNL Neng R. Bauer DOE /CHOO FSchauer M. Reich, OfL JKnight i
CPolsusny DDandois, CON VZeoli, CON ZRosztoczy, DST CPaugh -M/g NRR Contract File (DCorley)
DE:SE,B i
[ps/py { _
ORM XCleu '
1/i/83 b,.
J3)HBassettl c) 1/3lr) 3/5/83 mens...D..E...:.S...E.B....Li t.e.
....D E.:.S..E..B.....D..E. :.S..E..B.l.
>,,...-..D..E..:ID./C..S..E....
/d '
smA= )...N. C.h.o. k..s..h..i......
.. D..J..e..n 9.y............F..P.S..c..h..a. 6..e..'r..
..J..P.....g h..t..s....z/..D E..................
..N..R.. R............
D..E..................
..C..P.o...s..l.u...s.n..y..B..G r e n i e r.....
R..H..V..o..l..l m..e..r....
...l.&.I.8 3..........111.l#.3..........lLSI.8.3..........UALU........'.U.1V.U...........l./...1.E 3...... 11..../.aa.......
can >
c : :mu na no-a:i sacu o 4o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
. > = =..... -
)
y STATEMENT OF WORK
Title:
?rebabilistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structure F i r. f.o. :
A3721 B&R:
20-19-50-53-2 Prcject Manager: Nilesh C. Chokshi (FTS 492-8973)
BACKGROUND In many events, we need to evaluate existing nuclear power plant structures to a redefined seismic hazard.
For example, SEP plants and sone recent OL plants whose design basis was changed from original CP stage fall in this category.
Since the structures are already built, we are interested in evaluating the actual safety margins existing in the design to revised seismic hazard.
Probabilistic analysis of structures
. provide excellent tools for evaluating these safety margins in the cuantitative form.
For any analytical scheme of structural probabi-listic calculations, rather than the Monte Carlo Option, the seismic hazard needs to be defined in the power spectral density (PSD) form.
This PSD is then further used in the structural analysis as discussed below.
In addition, recent PRAs have ecphasized the importance of seismic risk analysis. The computer code developed in this program will be used to make independent analysis, particularly, in the area of structural fragility.
OBJECTIVE This program is designed to develop a computer program which can be used to c;uickly determine the definition of site specific power spectral densities (g values and other hazard parameters to be defined by GSB) for further use in the structural analysis. These power spectral densities shculd.be developed accounting for local i
site conditions in a generic way such as soft, medium and rock sites.
This power density function will then be used in n
7 s
^
~,
-the existing probabilistic structural code (RAS), including -he effect of soil-structure interaction analysis, to generate the response statistics with non-exceedance probabilities (including floor response spectra). The results of these probabilistic analysis will be used as supplementary basis to make licensing decisions.
RAS capabilities will also be enhanced to compute structural fragilities useful in PRA applications.
~
--WORK-REOUIREMENTS Task 1: Determination of Seismic Hazard in the form of Site Specific Power Spectral _ Densities and Other Related Parameters.
(Estimated completion date:
December 31,1983).
This task will develop methodology for determining site specific power spectral densities accounting for local site conditions in a generic way, such as soft, medium and rock sites. These power spectral densities will be developed on basis. The basis will be the use of g values and other hazard parameter (e.g. response spectra) defined by the Geosciences Branch of NRC for the particular site.
The second approach is necessary since the computerized methodology to.be developed at the end of the program can be used to gain some insight into the effect of site-specific seismic hazard at the site while more-accurate definition of the seismic hazard is being developed. This task will,be consisting of, at the least, the following subtasks.
--_m 4..
l c.
3-S.abtask
- b. Develop methodology for generating power spectral densities from other parameters such as response spectra and vice
- versa,
- c. Prepare a report on the methodology and results developed in this task.
The proposal.should identify additional subtasks, if needed, and provide more. detailed description to achieve the objective.
Task 2: Integrate Seismic Hazard into the Existing Computer Code RAS to Generate Probabilistic Structural Responses.
(Estimated completien date: December 31,1984)
In general, this task will require that the methodology developed in Task l be programmed into RAS, such that, given a location, geometry and other site-specific parameters one can compute responses and response spectra for a given structure.
These responses will be probabilistic and have non-exceedance/
exceedance probabilities attached to them. Also, probabilities of failure in terms of reaching a limit state will also be computed.-
s O
A w.
.4.
Following are the major subtasks of this task.
Subtask a. Add material properties variation explicitly.
- b. Add simplified soil. structure interaction (SSI) analysis capability.
- c. Add explicit treatment of uncertainties (random and modelling) for use in PRAs.
d.. Include tornado loads.
- e. Modify existing RAS program manuals to include theoretical development, user manual and other pertinent information.- --
The documentation of the RAS information will be in accordance with the SEB Policy and Procedures Manual, Chapter VI.
- f. Implement this program into the NRC/B4L system and provide
, adequate training to NRC staff using this program.
Task 3: Demonstration and Verification of Methodology (Estimated Completion Date: December 31,~1984)
Carry out a demonstration of the RAS code by performing the analysis of a nuclear power plant structure and verify this methodology in an appropriate manner. A report will be required at the end of this task showing the application, results and the basis of verification.
9
=
E 9
/
~
/.
^
LEVEL GF EFFORT AND PERIOD OF PERF0PJ4ANCE The estimated level of effort for the work is one staff year for the
-first fiscal year and one staff year for the second fiscal year, ending December, 1984.
REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION RE0VIREMENTS The contractor shall prepare and deliver the following:
1.
After completing Task 1, 2, and 3, reports as described earlier.
2.
Original or legible copies of all notes, letters, codes, papers, books, and written or printed material gathered for the purpose of completing these tasks.
Monthly Business Letter Report A monthly business letter report will be submitted by the 15th of the month to the NRR Project Manager with copies provided to the Director,-Division of Encinne-ino ATTN: Project Assistant, Branch Chief, and B. L. Grenier,~NRR.
These reports will identify the title of the project, the FIN, the Principal Investigator, the period of performance, nd the reporting period and will contain 2 sections as follows:
Project Status Section 1.
. A listing of the efforts completed during the period; milestones reached, or if missed, an explanation provided.
2.
.Any problems or del.ays encountered or anticipated and recommendations for resolution. If 3.
A summary of progress to date (this may-be expressed in terms of percentage completion for each task).
4.
Plans for the next reporting period.
Financial StatusSection I'
1.
Provide the total cost (value) of the projet.t as reflected in the prooosal (NRC Form 189), the total amount of funds coligateTto date, ano the balanc'e of funds required to compleje the work by,' fiscal year as follows:
Total Funds Balance of Funds Projected Obligatec By Fiscal Year Project Cost To Date FY-FY-FY-e T
l u
2 Provide the t:tal direct staff use and amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and total cumulative to date in the following categcries:
Period Cumulative a.
Direct Lab Staff Effort b.
Funds ($000)
Direct Salaries Materials and Services (Excluding ADP)
ADP Support Subcontracts Travel Expenses Indirect Labor Costs Other (Specify)
General and Administrative TOTAL
( ".) 2_/
i p-5.t._ Provide the total amount of funds expended (costed) during the period d
.an. cumulative to date for each task.
~,
1/
If the recommended' resolution involves a Work Order modificat' ion, i.e., chas,ge in work requirements, level of effort (costs), or period of perfomance, a separate letter should be prepared and submitted to the Director, Division of Enoineertnc, ATTN: Program Assistant, and a copy provided to the NRR Project Manager and B. L. Grenier, NRR.
2/
Provide percentace against total funds oblicated to date.
[
MEETIfGS AND TRAVEL Approximately, three reetkngs (involvir.g three to four contractor employees) gf one/two day duration each are anticipated in Bethesda during the cent.act period of performance.
One will be held at project initiaticn to discuss the scope of the effort.
in addition, one trip to one plant site ray be required.
HRC FURNISHED MATERIALS URC will provide copies of tonical reports, pirtions of SAR's and details and drawings of selected plant on an as-required basis.
\\
' ~ ~
^.
~
~ ~ ~
~
' " ~
^
', &.. a..
1 JAN 2 61983 i
fir. Gregory J. Ogeka, Chief Administrative Branch 3rookhaven Area Office U. S. Department of Energy Upton flew York 11973
Dear Mr. Ogeka:
Subject:
Bill Technical Assistance to the Division of Engineering, flRR, NRC
^Probabilistic Response and Response Snectra for Category I Structure" (Fill ?!o. A3721)
This letter is a request for a proy)sarfrom the BrsoTchaven flit 161ial Laboratory to provide technical assistance to the Division of Engineering.
The Statement of Work in Enclosure 1 details the required work and should be used as the basis for preparing a proposal for submission to this office. Standard tems and conditions for !!RC work, as provided in the DOE /NRC Memorandum of Understanding of February 24, 1978 and described in NRC Manual Chapter 1102, apply to this effert.
If a portion of this work is to be subcontracted out, we require that Bf!L have a professional assigned to the contract who is qualified to defend the results. Al so,
approval of the subcontractor by rte is required in writing prior to initiation of any subcontracted e(fort. The proposal should contain as a minimum the information set forth in Enclosure 2 and should be submitted in six copies in the format of the Statement of !!ork to:
Chester Peslusny Program Assistant Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, D.C.
20555 Work under this program is not anticipated to be classified, but it may concern proprietary information that is provided in vendor topical reports and should be handled in accordance rith the Rules of Practice to CFR 2.790.
This request for proposal is not an authorization to start work.
Authorization to commende work becomes effective upon Brookhaven Operations Office acceptance of an appropriately executed NRC Form 173, Standard Order for DOE Ucrk.
j crrics >
.............. ~. - -
. - ~ ~ ~. ~.. -.
.-.~.---~~~~
. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
- - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
SUINAMEh
......... ~.
... ~. - - - - - = ~ ~
maaaaaa""
" * " = " " " * " " "
om)
- - - ~ ~ ~ ~
~~-~~~~~
~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY me row sia no-m ucu ma uscecom-us-e<
s.
JAN 2 61981 ifr. Gregory J. Ogeka If you have any questions about this request, please contact
!!r. C. Poslusny on FTS 492-7067. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely.
Original signed W Richard H. Vollmer, Director
' Division of Engineering Office of fluclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
1.
Statement of ifork 2.
Proposal Content Distribution
-~R. BarbeF,~iiQ-D0s
-~
Nuickshi--
--~
cc:
W. Kato, SNL KClau H. Grahn, BNL Neng 2
R. Bauer, DOE /CHOO FSchauer M. Reich, BNL JKnight CPolsusny DDandois, CON 2
VZeoli, CON ZRosztoczy, DST R Contr c File (DCorley) e d
Copy sent to H. Bassett 1/24/83 for simultaneous concurrence.
DE:SE.B F
y ORM I
KCleu I
]ssett) 1/;/83 i/
,7) 1/ /83_
omce,...D..E...:.S...E.B...wR....
....D..E...:.S..E..B..
......D..E...:.S..E..f.
DE:AD/CSE DE
'I NRR
)
e
.........b. s......
D..E..../._,.. )
sunumwe >...N..C.h.o. k..s..h..i......
.. D..J..e..n. 9.y............F..PS..c..h..a..d
..J..P..Kn.qi.g h..t....C..P.o..s.l..u...s.n..y
.................., '.f....................
B
...G.r.e....e.,r.j R. H..V.o..T..i.m
..e......
e......
..l!.k.l83...... 141.128.3........14.W.8.a........l.L.i.W.3...... h1./.:.V.Ba.......U...'d.a a.?..... 1./.2.V.aa.........
e,n >
nne renu sta po.ec> nncu c 4o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY wom ini_m.u
STATEMENT OF WORK
Title:
Probabilistic Response and Response' Spectra for Category I Structure Fin No.:
A3721 B&R: 20-19-50-53-2 Project Manager:
Nilesh C. Chokshi (FTS 492-8973)
BACKGROUND In many. events, we need to evaluate existing nuclear power plant structures to a redefined seismic hazard.
For example, SEP plants and some recent OL plants whose design basis was changed from original CP stage fall in this category. Since the structures are already built, we are interested in evaluating the actual safety margins existing in the design to revised seismic hazard.
Probabilistic analysis of st'ructures provide excellent tools for evaluating these safety margins in the cuantitative form.
For any analytical scheme of structural probabi-listic calculations, rather than the Monte Carlo Option, the seismic hazard needs to be defined in the power spectral density (PSD) form.
This PSD is then further used in the structural analysis as discussed below.
In addition, recent PRAs have emphasized the importance of seismic risk analysis.
The computer code developed in this program will
~
be.used to make independent analysis, particularly, in the area of structural fragility.
OBJECTIVE This program is designed to develop a computer program which can be used to quickly determine the definition of site specific power spectral densities (g values and other hazard parameters to be defined by GSB) for further use in the structural analysis. These power spectral densities should be developed accounting for local si.te conditions in a generic way such as soft, medium and rock sites.
This power density function will then be used in 3
f
m
- the existing probabilistic structural code (RAS), including the effect of soil-structure interaction analysis, to generate the response statistics with non-exceedance probabilities (including floor response spectra). The results of this probabilistic analysis will be used as a supplementary basis to make licensing decisions.
RAS capabilities will also be enhanced to compute structural fragilities useful in PRA applications.
WORK REQUIREMENTS
~~Taill 1: DiteiWination of Seismic Hazard in the form of Site Specific -- -- - - - - -
Power Spectra 1 Densities and Other Related Parameters.
(Estimated' completion date:
December 31,1983).
This task will develop methodology for determining site specific power spectral densities accounting for local site conditions in a generic way, such as soft, medium and rock sites. These power spectral.
densities will be developed from the hazard parameters (e.g., response spectra, peak acceleration) defined by the Geosciencies Branch of t;RC for the particular site. This task will be consisting of, at the least, the following subtasks.
.. Subtask a.
Develop methodology for generating power spectral densities from other parameters such as response spectra and vice versa.
b.
Prepare a report on the methodology and results developed in this task.
'The ' proposal should identify additional subtasks, if needed, and provide more detailed description to achieve the objective.
Task 2:
Integrate Seismic Hazard into the Existing Computer Code RAS to Generate Probabilistic Structural Responses.
(Estimated completion date:
December 31,1984) _
In general, this task will require-that the methodology developed in Task 1 be programmed into RAS, such that, given a location, geometry and other site-specific parameters, one can compute responses and response spectra for a given structure.
These responses will be probabilistic and have non-exceedance/
exceedance probabilities attached to them. Also, probabilities of failure in terms of reaching a limit state will also be computed.
. Following are the major subtasks of this task.
Subtask a. Add material properties variation explicitly.
- b. Add simplified soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis capability.
- c. Add explicit treatment of uncertainties (random and modelling) for use in PRAs.
- d. Include tornado loads.
- e. Modify _ existing RAS program manuals to include theoretical-
. development, user manual and other pertinent information.
The documentation of the RAS information will'be in accordance with the SEB Policy and Procedures Manual, Chapter VI.
- f. Implement this program into the NRC/Bt4L. system and provide adequate training to NRC staff using this program.
Task 3: Demonstration and Verification of Methodology (Estimated Completion Date: December 31,1984)
Carry out a demonstration of the RAS code by performing the analysis of a nuclear power plant structure and verify this methodology in an appropriate manner. A report will be required at the end of this task showing the application, results and the basis of verification.
'^
r LEVEL OF EFFORT AND PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The estimated level of effort for the work is one staff year for the first fiscal year and one staff year for the second fiscal year, ending December, 1984
~
REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION RE0VIREMENTS The contractor shall prepare and deliver the following:
1.
After completing Task 1, 2, and 3, reports as described earlier.
2.
Original or legible copies of all notes, letters, codes, papers, books, and written or printed material gathered for the purpose of completing _these._ tasks.
1.
Monthly Business i.etter Reoort 1
A monthly business letter report will be submitted by the 15th.of the month to the NRR Project Manager with copies provided to the Director, Division of Enoineerino
, ATTN: Project Assistant, Branch Chief, and B. L. Grenier,~NRR.
These reports will identify the title of the project, the FIN, the Principal Investigator, the period of perfonnance, and the reporting period and will contain 2 sections as follows:
Project Status Section
~
1.
A listing of the efforts completed during the period; milestones reached, or if missed, an explanation provided.
2.
Any problems or delays. encountered or anticipated and recommendations for resolution. If 3.
A summary of progress to date (this may-be expressed in terms of percentage completion for each task).
4.
Plans for the next reporting period.
~
l Financial Status Section
~
1.
Provide the total cost (value) of the project as reflected in the crocosal (NRC Form 189), the total amount of fuiids obligateTto cate, and the. balance of funds required to compleje the work b2 fiscal year as follows:
Total Funds Balance of Funds Projected Obligated By Fiscal Year project Cost To Date FY-FY-FY-
, - - = - -,
,..,.. - ~, -
,,-~~,
, 2.
Provide the tctal direct staff use and amount of funds expended (costed) following,during the period and total cumulative to date in the categories:
Period Cumulative a.
Direct Lab Staff Effort b.
Funds (5000)
Direct Salaries Materials and Services (Excluding ADP)
ADP Support Subcontracts Travel Expenses Indirect Labor Costs Other (Specify)
General and Administrative TOTAL
(%)2/
3.
Provide the. total amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and cumulative to date for each task..
1/
If the recommende'd resolution involves a Work Order modifi. cation,
-~
1.e., change in work requirements, level of effort (costs), or period of performance, a separate letter should be prepared and submitted to the Director, Division of Encineertno, ATTN: Program Assistant, and a copy provided to the NRR Project Manager and B. L. Grenier, NRR.
2/
Provide percentage against t'otal funds oblicated to date.
MEETINGS AND TRAVEL Approximately, three meetings (involving three to four contractor employees) of one/twu day duration each are anticipated in Bethesda during the contract period of performance. One will be held at project initiation to discuss. the scope of the effort.
In addition, one trip to
-one plant' site may be required.
NRC FURNISHED MATERIALS NRC will provide copies of topical reports, portions of SAR's and details and drawings of selected plant on an as-required basis.
PROPOSAL CONTENT cuciusure e m
The minimum items required for preparation o'f all DOE proposals (NRC Form 189) are:
Project Title - The title should be.a unicue identifier of the project reflecting a generai 1cea of the enec= passed work.
In mest cases, the title en the NRC Statement of We i (SCW) shculd be used.
2.
Date cf Prc csal - Include revision number if applicable.
2.
NRC Office - Indicate the NRC Office (s) supporting or requesting the work.
4 FIN Number and B&R Number - Indicate NRC's FIN Number and B&R Number", as provided on tne SCW.
E.
DOE Contractor - Performing organization's name.
5.
Site - Indicate location (s) of organization that will perform the work.
> 7.
Contractor Account and DOE B&R Number - Highest level feasible.
8.
Coonizant Personnel -NRC Project Manager and other NRC Technical Staff, if applicable; DOE Project Manager; and, the performing organization's key personnel: Project Manager and principal investigator (s), and FTS phone number; include their resumes g.
Period of Performance - Provide proposed date of cc=mencement of work and best-estimated completion date of the project.
~
10.
Staff-Years of Effort ar;d Costs - Estimate to be incurred by DOE contractors, suocontractors, ano consultants.
List by fiscal year frem start to ccmpl'etion of the project (FIN).
Cost estimate will be consistent with DOE Manual 2200, the Pricing Manual, and shown in thousands of dollars.
a.
Staff-years of Effort (Laboratory personnel only):
(1)
Direct Scientific / Technical (2)- Other Direct (Graded) b.
Costs:
4 (1)
Direct Salaries (FTE's)
(2) Material and Services (Excluding ADP)
(3) ADP Support (a)
Subcontracts (5) Travel Expense (a) Domestic (b)
Foreign (6
Indirect Labor Costs Other (specify)
General and Administrative Expense (
%)
Total Operating Cost Capital Equipment (FIN charged
)
Total Project Cost 11.
Monthly Forecast Expense - Provide the planned monthly rate of costs by fiscal year.
This may be provided with the first report of an authorized program if not known at time of proposal submittal.
At the beginning of each subsequent year, reports should '
include the planned monthly rate of costs for the ensuing year.
7 12.
Forecast !111estone Chart - Complete as shown on NRC Form 189.
13.
Accroval Authority - Proposal must be sicned by an appropriate laboratory or field ac m ty representative.
Note:
This inSividual may or may not be tbs same person who ti; :
c trar.s,ittal letter.
l
_r-3
~
I'4 Project Description - Piuvide narrative descriptions of the following' topics in the orcer:listec on plain ~ paper attached to.the NRC Form 189.
If an item is not applicable, so' state'on the NRC Form 189.
i i
a.
Objective of procosed Work (1)
Sackcrounc - Provice a brief summary of the technical prcblem, issue, or need to orient the reader to the requirements for the work or end project.
'(2) Objective - State cencisely the performing organization's understanding cf Ine oojective(s).
b.
Sum 9ary c/ Prior Efforts - Not applicable c.
Work Recuirements - Describe the tasks and subtasks to be performed in such a manner tnat a cisinterested third party can understand what'is to be done and how it will be accomplished for the level of effort and period of performance proposed.
Describe any assumptions being mada pertinent to perfoming the work.
Provide criteria or other bases upon which evaluations, judgment or other action will be taken.
Describe potential problems and recommend solutions.
State and describe separately any options being proposed that require NRC approval before proceeding.
.d.
Reporting Recuirements - State the number, type, and other content of the repo'rts requested or proposeo to be provided, to whom and when they are to be submitted,
. and,. if requested by NRC, whether drafts will be provided prior to finalization.
- e. 'Meetinos and Travel - State the number of trips that the performi'ng organization will require to perform the work and identify where and how many people are expected to travel.
If no travel is expected or required, state none.
Foreign travel must be addressed separately and approval must be obtained by processing NRC Form 445 in addition to being provided as part of the approved proposal.
f.
NRC Furnished Material - Specify any equipment, background reports or data, or otner specific materials required to be provided by NRC.
g.
Descriotion of Anv Follow-On Efforts - Not applicable.
h.
Relationshio to Other projects - Identify related projects that either (1) cenerate information Inat will be needed to acccmplish the work proposed under this project or (2) will use information generated by this project, and (3) support a common objective.
If none, so state on the NRC Fom 189.
1.
Subcontracter Infcrmation - Identify the subcontractor or consultant and describe any effort trat w1ii ce performed by a subcontracter or consultant, and reference the task or subtask described under the work requirements that the subcontractor or' consultant effort will support. Any work performed by the subcontractor on behalf of the nuclear industry that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of interest must be described.
If the subcontractor is not known at the time the proposal is being submitted, so indicate and describe status and expected time frame for selection of the subcontractor (s) or consultant (s).
j.
New Capital Eautoment Required - List all capital equipment which must be purchased by the performing organization to perform the described work.
k.
Soecial Facilities Recuired - Describe any new special facilities required to perform this project.
1.
Conflict of Interest Information - Describe any significant contractual and organizational relationsnips of the DOE and its contractor on this proposal with industries regulated by the NRC (e.g., utilities, etc.) and suppliers thereof (e.g., architect engineers and reactor manufacturers, etc.) that might give rise to an apparent.or actual conflict of interest.
[
.. -