ML20127M964
Text
m
~
~. *:
- e tjNITED STATES j g ,g,i ,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- f , , E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 / f'(,'!.py s
'N ,,
- January 24, 1983 #
.? 7 ,3.
MEMORANDUM FOR: Idartin Hayes, RES eu Alan P. Muir, I&E e..
John Evans, NMSS ' ,
Carlyle Michelson, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Dennis Dougherty, Regicn III Howard Rose, Region IV pa n texanaer&gion. .V.. . . .3 FROM:
Bernard L.Support Technical Grenier,BranchTechnical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE P
~ .- w- -
In accordance withTstaDilshed procedbes',~'theittached NRR Technical. _._
Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A3721) ,
If youworking (10) concur,days.please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten 10-day period. Although If a problem is identified, please advise ce within the the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,yIresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually receiving your written concurrence.
you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.You need only return Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
~ / ,,
LhA
- trna / . Grenier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
HRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy C. Poslusny I have revieweo objection the acove titled Technical Assistance Project and find no in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
' $h&fMLS Y3/b3 8505230399 841002 9" #*
NLL 243 PDR yr/W (Office 1
)
l 1
a ,
- - /* n _
[..
-+p
.ps%g c L ,
UNITED STATES
.j '-[g sg,i - NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1: s ,,
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 yw]
January 24, 1983 MEMGRANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES ~ '
Alan P. Muir, I&E
~
John Evans, NMSS Carlyle Michelson, AE0D John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Dennis Souchgety Daa4aa 177
% ,.a y o.9,to,.y y.. __ _ _
Ida Alexander, Region V FROM:'
Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PR H - -In accordance with estabTfshidiprocedures, t'he attAhed NRR Technical
- Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
. Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A3721)
If youworking (10) ccncur,days.
please sign below and return this memorandum ~ to me within ten 10-day period. Although If a problem is identified, please advise me within the the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,yIresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the' attached Statement of Work for your record.
L Your prompt attention to_ this review will be appreciated.
e (rna Y 'eA L
. Grenier - .
Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: 'Z. Rosztoczy .
C; Poslusny
- . nave reviewed the aoove titiec Technical Assis nce Pr objection in its issuance. Concurrence is, pro 1 ed be) ject[and find no /
/
(Mgneo)
(Date')
}h -
14(To (OfficW)
/lbiv'
/ '
O e
x ...
/ %, u;UTED STATES
! Njjy, -,. (/( i , NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.; WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 r, w. ~ ,
January 24, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Carlyle Michelson, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region _ II rimhh'fi"llaunhertK_RegfEflIM Howard Rose, Region IV Ida Alexander, Region V FROM:
Bernard L.Support Technical Grenier,Branch Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW Atl0 C00RDIflATION OF NRR TECHNIC L ASSISTANCE PRO In accordance with established procedures, the attached flRR Technical Assistance Project is fonvarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A3721)
If youworking (10) concur,days.
please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten 10-day period. Although If a problem is identified, please advise me within the the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,y Iresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt ' attention to this review will be appreciated.
S '
u veA trna . Grenier Technical Assistance Program Mana'ger Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy .
C. Posiusny I have reviewed the aoove titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
~(Signed)
A .ft h e (Date) ff Q..LtAf % 22:p[ &
a3 (Office)JAN 2 't 1983 g,7g t..
, ,4 ,
'. *# % UNITED STATES *
- [ $, . . , 'l ,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- .g- /, j WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 or e a .
Q' ~;.,o *e f
..... . January 24, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Carlyle Michelson, AEOD w= , neron;.M vonrti.
Richardrw' J. Mate _y, Region II Dennis Dougherty, Region III Howard Rose, Region IV Ida Alexander, Region V FROM:
Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNIC L ASSISTANCE PROJE
~_- '
In-accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I' Structures (FIN A3721)
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10) working days. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,yIresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you m'ay keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review wi,ll be appreciated. ,
$/y '
i t.'wh (rna./ . Grenier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy .
C. Posiusny W.
^h nave reviewed the above titled Tecnnical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
s
. ~
A 6- 1 $' 3 (Signed) \
(Datei
(-b\0td (Office) )
~
i.
.M- .h ug#o UNITED STATES ~
8 ** NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION b ; - . , 9, E WASHINGTON, D. C. 2055$
k' . ... ... <g/ *
. January 24, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Haye's, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans. NMS9 mrTyra Micneuerrf'AEOD*
John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Dennis Dougherty, Region III Howard Rose, Region IV Ida Alexander, Region V FROM:
Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEWANDCOORDINATIONOFNRRTECHNICkLASSISTANCEPROJECTS In accordance+Mh-established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A3721)
If youworking (10) concur,days. please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten 10-day period. Although If a problem is identified, please advise me within the the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,yIresponse within this time frame would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review wi,11 be appreciated. .
/
grna
' . Grenier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
HRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy .
C. Po::lusny I have reviewed objection the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below. .
900Ato-(Signed)
, /.m 6 (Date) atoD.
(Office)
~ -
'. Ig y j 3.c. '( ,g UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION k
- ' f, j WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 o a
\; ...../ . January 24, 1983 MEMORAi100M FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, IAE -
'4aha TvAnnue" Carlyle Michelson, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Dennis Dougherty, Region III Howard Rose, Region IV Ida Alexander, Region V FROM:
Bernard L.Support Technical Grenier,Branch Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE P In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical
~ ._
Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A3721)
If youworking (10) concur,days.
please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten 10-day period. Although If a problem is identified, please advise me within the the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,yIresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually
' receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to .this review wi,ll be appreciated. .
1' M rna . Grenier .
Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
HRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy C. Poslusny I have reviewed objection the above titled Technical A sistance Project and find no in-its issuance. Concurrence is,p vi ed e 6w.
a ll / 6 'b7lfY (5 gpd~ ) / " (DateT hlf.tCi (Office)
r
- pP **%,,$ UNITED STATES j 8 $ ,.. , ,'f i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
} ; g. g . j WASHING TON, D. C. 20555
- t,@G.N,g January 24, 1983 MEM00ANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Carlyle Michelson, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar Deh 7 mcnar[ K h'iy,4 oion 4EJ Mennis Dougherty, Region III Howard Rose, Region IV
Ida Alexander, Region V FROM:
Bernard TechnicalL.Support Grenier,Branch Technical Assistance Program Manager -
Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A3721)
If you (10) concur,days.
working please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten 10-day period. Although If a problem is identified, please advise me within the the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,y Iresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually receiving your written concurrence.
you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.You need only return Your prcmot attention to this review wi,ll be appreciated.
/, .
~
Berna /? ". t:mA Grenier .
Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy C. Posiusny I nave reviewed objection tne aoove titled Tecnnical Assistance Project and find no in its issuance.
~
Concurrenceisgrovide below.
h(Si hh 6(late) o ed k)/ f (GTfice; Officia' Copy
. 7 UNITED STATES
- e
- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
. I WASWNGTON. D. C. 20555 h'hC L s,.v-f
..... . January 24, 1983 MEMORAriDUM FOR: diactin.Rayes, RES- 4 Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Carlyl.e Michelson, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Dennis Dougherty, Region III Howard Rose, Region IV Ida Alexander, Region V FROM:
Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJ In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is fonvarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A37211 - If you (10) concur,days. working please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten 10-day per.iod. Although If a problem is identified, please advise me within the the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,yIresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record. Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated. . l
~ .
1.m*A
/rna . Grenier
- Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy C. Posiusny
- OW I have reviewed tne above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection-in-its-issuance.-Concurrence-is provided below. i (Signeo)
% l 3/h.$
(Dat() (Office) RES l O
. . c'u , ~v. : 6 u..
o UNITED STATES
~ "
g 8 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - 1 f, . ,I WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 "
\,...../ January 24, 1983
' MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Carlyle Michelson, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Dennis Dougherty, Region III Howard Rose, Region IV Ida Alexander, Region V -
'FROM:
Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNIC L ASSISTANCE PROJEC
-In accordance with established procedur~es~,~ the attached NRR Technical._ - . .-.--. .-.. - - -- -- - -
Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probablistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures (FIN A3721) If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10) working days. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of an will be considered a positive concurrence,y Iresponse within this would appreciate time frame eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record. Your prompt attention to this review wi,ll be appreciated..
,' ,F u u- ..s erna Grenier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project ec: Z. Rosztoczy C. Poslusny I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below. (Signed) (Date) . (Office) l
\
STATEf4EtiT OF WORK
Title:
Prcbabilistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structure Fir, f;o. : A3721 B&R: 20-19-50-53-2 Project l'ar.ager: f!ilesh C. Chokshi (FTS 492-8973) BACKGROUfl0 In many events, we need to evaluate existing nuclear power plant structures to a redefined seismic hazard. For example, SEP plants and some recent OL plants whose design basis was changed from original CP stage fall in this category. Since the structures are already built, we are interested in evaluating the actual safety margins existing in the i design to revised seismic hazard. Probabilistic analysis of structures provide excellent tools for evaluating these safety margins in the cuantitative form. For any analytical scheme of structural probabi-listic calculations, rather than the l4onte Carlo Option, the seismic hazard n'eeds to be defined in the power spectral density (PSD) form. This PSD is then further used in the structural analysis as discussed below. In addition, recent PRAs have emphasized the importance of seismic risk analysis. The computer code developed in this program will be used to make independent analysis, particularly, in the area of structural fragility. OBJECTIVE This program is designed to develop a ccmputer program which can be used to quickly deternine the definition of site specific power spectral densities (g. values and other hazard parameters to be defined by GSB) for further use in the structural analysis. These power spectral densities should be developed accounting for local site conditions in a generic way such as soft, medium and rock sites. This power density function will then be used in ' S I
r-
- m -
the existing probabilistic structural code (RAS), ir.cluding the effect of soil-structure interaction analysis, to generate the response statistics with non-exceedance probabilities (including floor response spectra). The results of these probabilistic analysis will be used as supplementary basis to make licensing decisions. RAS capabilities will also be enhanced to compute structural fragilities useful in PRA applications. - ~ WORK REQUIREMENTS - - Task 1: Determination of Seismic Hazard in the form of Site Specific Power Spectr'al Densities and Other Related Parameters. (Estimated completion date: December 31,.1983). This task will develop methodology for determining site specific power spectral densities accounting for local site conditions in a generic way, such as soft, medium and rock sites. These power spectral densities will be developed on basis. The basis will be the use of g values and other hazard parameter (e.g. responie spectra) defined by the Geosciences Branch of NRC for the particular site. The second approach is necessary since the computerized methodology to be developed at the end of the program can be used to gain so'me insight into the effect of site-specific seismic hazard at the site while more accurate definition of the seismic hazard is being developed. This task
.will be consisting of, at the least, the following subtasks.
Subtask
- b. Develop methodology for generating power spectral densities from other parameters such as response spectra and vice versa,
- c. Prepare a report on the methodology and results developed in thi s-tas k.-- - - - - --
The proposal should identify additional subtasks, if needed, and provide more detailed description to achieve the objective. Task 2:. Integrate Seismic Hazard into the Existing Computer Code RAS to Generate Probabilistic Structural Responses. (Estimated completion date: December 31,1~984) In general, this task will require that the methodology developed in Task I be programmed into RAS, such that, given a , location, geometry and other site-specific parameters one can compute responses and response spectra for a given st.ructure. These responses will be probabilistic and have non-exceedance/ exceedance probabilities attached to them. Also, probabilities of failure in terms of reaching a limit state will also be computed.'
+
0 0 0 0
] .
.4-Following are the major subtasks of this task.
Subtask a. Add material properties variation explicitly.
- b. Add simplified soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis capability.
- c. Add explicit treatment of uncertainties (random and modelling) for use in PRAs.
- d. Include tornado loads.
- e. Modify existing RAS program manuals to include theoretical development, user manual and other pertinent information.
The documentation of the RAS information will be in accordance with the SES Policy and Procedures Manual, Chapter VI.
- f. Implement this program into the NRC/Bt(L system and provide adequate training to NRC staff using this program.
Task 3: Demonstration and Verification of l'ethodology (Estimated Completion Date: December 31,1984) , Carry out a demonstration of the RAS code by performing the
- analysis of a nuclear power plant structure and verify this methodology in an appropriate manner. A report' will
~
, be required at the end of this task showing the application, results and the basis of verification.
O S 0 m_._ ,
, , Y.. .
. I' LEVEL OF EFFORT AND PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The estimated level of effort for the work is one staff year for the first fiscal year and one staff year for the second fiscal year, ending December, 1984.
REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS The contractor shall prepare and deliver the following:
~
_1. After completing Task 1, 2, and 3, reports as described earlier.
- 2. Original or 16gible copies of all notes, letters, ccdes, papers, books, and written or printed material gathered for the purpose of completing these-tasks. - - - - - ~- -
. . . . . . . . m. _.__==.-... - --- ._. = ._.. . -
l' Monthly Business Letter Report i A monthly business letter report will be submitted by the'15th of the month to the NRR Project Manager with copies provided to the Director, Division i of Enain.. ina , ATTN: Project Assistant, Branch Chief, and l . B. L. Grenier, NRR. These reports will identify the title of the project, l the FIN, the Principal -Investigator, the period of perfonnance, and the - reporting period and will contain 2 sections as follows: Project Status Section -
- 1. A listing of the efforts completed during the period; milestones i ,
reached, or if missed, an explanation provided.
- 2. Any problems or delays encountered or anticipated and recomendations for resolution. y .
l 3. A surmnary of progress to date (this may-be expressed in terms of percentage completion for. each task) , ,
- 4. Plans for the next reporting period. '
I Financial Status Section '
-1. Provide the total cost (value) of the project as reflected in the proposal (NRC Form 189),,the total amount of fuiids os11gateli~tDate.
ano the balance of funds required to compig$e "the work g fiscal year as follows:
. Total Funds Balance of Funds P'rojected Obligated By Fiscal Year .
Project Cost To Date , FY- FY- FY-I
. I
r;
,.' 3
.T .
, . 2. Provide the total direct staff use'and amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and total cumulative to date in the following categories: -
Period Cuculative
- a. Direct Lab Staff Effort
- b. Funds ($0001 l
Direct Sa1 aries Materials and Services .
~
(ExcludingADP) ADP Support Subcontracts Travel Expenses Indirect Labor Costs Other (Specify)
- General and Administrative TOTAL
,, ( ) 2_/
- 3. Provide the total amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and cumulative to date for each task..
1/ If the recommende d resolution involves a Work Order modification, l i.e., change in work requirements, level of effort (costs), or period of performance, a seoarate letter should be prepared and submitted to the Director, Division of Enotneerina , ATTN: Program Assistant, and - a copy provided to the NRR Project Manager and B. L. Grenier, NRR. Provide percentage against t'otal funds oblicated to date. 2_/ MEETIrlGS AfiD TRAVEL Approximately, three meetings (involving three to four contractor employees) of one/two day duration each are anticipated in Bethesda during the contract period of performance. One will be held at project initiation to discuss the scope of the effort. In addition, one trip to one plant site may be required.
, fRC FURtISHED MATERIALS fiRC will provide copies of topical reports, portions of SAR's and i dutails and drawings of selected plant on an as-required basis.
9 9 O .
g . -
,m .
N u.s..a.uc;.tAA AEcuuicar ccessici. .~ a....-
. y. .:. ser
"8' DOE SOURCE SELECTION JUSTIFICATIOff A3721 Probabilistic Response and Response Spectra for Category I Structures BNL NRR/DE. Structural Engineering Branch s.v. u .< ne.w au wn Nilesh Chokshi NM (. C/Mur[s.*
--m... _ac.= u.,.u u
/1/VM w..a......~...,......--.-.-,... .
This task, in part, is the continuation of the previous contract A3361. The BNL performance in the previous contract was excellent and it will be extremely inefficient and cause schedule delays if this task were to be performed by some other laboratory. The following paragraph further . indicates why the lab was chosen to perform the earlier contract and why it should continue. The BNL has competent staff with extensive experience in probability dnalysis methods. Over the last three years, they have completed several NRR sponsored technical assistance programs in this area. An # example of this can be found in report NUREG-CR-1330, whera BNL was responsible for reviewing methods and criteria for dynamic loads ' combinati'an for nuclear piping systems. In this study BNL developed
- various Montecarlo simulation procedures for finding proper ways for combining dynamic responses. Other tasks carried out for NRR by BNL in recent years involved the review of the state-of-the-art for civil engineering evaluation of Category I structures, development of method.
- of analysis for Category I structures, development of method of analysis for soil-structure interaction, evaluation of theoresponse of contain-ment and Category I structures, and devel'opment of computer code and benchmark problems for piping systems. The lab has the unique positiori in that various universities in New York metropolitan area work with the lab in structural dynamic and probabilistic analysis of structures. For example, Professor Shinozuka and Professor Meier of Columbia, Professor Schuman of Brooklyn Polytechnic, Professor B. Koplin of Manhatten College participate with the lab on a regularly scheduled basis in the
.- related structural work. Considering:the lab expertise and experience it is judged as one of the most appropriate sources for fulfilling this contract.
L j ,.....7.....,
,- ime
- c. ,.,, - q - v - ,
t, Assistant Director. C&SE. DE ! James P'. -
' o ..-:v m , . . ., e . . .
. ., c. ..,. .
I em Richat Mo Director ivision of Engineerine ' / _ , / V'
* . t g - , , - - , - . , - --,-g-- - -
- - , - - - - - - , - - ,- , , ,,. - y- -% --
[i. f- m ' e- .
, 23.R TECHNICAL ASSISTA! ICE PROGPE.
~ FFAS A* TIC:; SU:"'J.RY SHEET I . 0
~ ~i "!~E!'.D EY ::15: / N
***'II:
43%l TYPE OF ACTIOff: - s . PPAS REMARKS, COMMENTS, IDENTIFICATION OF DEFICIENCIES: . D a (2 rn ee e NO \ U6- M g h d%) -- M Wk (Es.a R{D.4 fl r
. . COCU:'Ei;T(S) MISSING FRO:4 FILE 1 '
CITE ACTION COMP!.ETED BY PPAS:
, 3d
, 06 <
f ' s L -
\
-}}