ML20105D275

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Amend on Diesel Generator Tests & Turbine Valve Surveillance.Licensee Should Be Contacted to Agree W/Changed Amends

ML20105D275
Person / Time
Site:	Mcguire, McGuire, 05000000
Issue date:	05/18/1984
From:	Gray J NRC
To:	Birkel R NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090636
Download: ML20105D275 (2)

Text

.. -

.~

..L L A i

' j%-

g h

. Note-to:

'R.~Birkel From:-

J. Gray'

SUBJECT:

.McGUIRE AMENDMENT ON DIESEL GENERATOR TESTS AND TURBINE VALVE SURVEILLANCE DELD has been asked to concur in the form of license amendments for

!McGuire 1.and 2 which extend requireltesting intervals for diesel

. generators from once every 18 months to refueling outages and reduce surveillance frequency for turbine valves from weekly'to monthly.

While i have no problem with the form of the amendments themselves, I do have a problem with the action we propose to take. Specifically, rather

- than grant the amendments requested by licensee, we propose to (1) authorize only a one. time exception to the 18 month testing requirement for diesel generators and (2) allow monthly rather than weekly turbine valve testing only

• ~ -

for an interim period until a Westinghouse study is reviewed by the Staff and conditioned on maintenance of AVT for

- secondary water chemistry, i

The licensee did. not ask for the license amendments we are giving. We basically have a choice of granting the amendments requested, denying the amendments, or getting the licensee to modify its amendment request to conform to what is acceptable to the staff. We have taken none of these approaches here.

I'd suggest that you contact the licensee and get him to agree to_the changed amendments which the staff has

+

proposed, if licensee agrees then the staff's SE should state that the staff's modified license amendments have been discussed with, and agreed to by, the licensee. Otherwise, you must either grant or deny the specific amendments requested by licensee.

I also note that no check has been made with SECY to ascertain whether -

comments or requests for hearing have been received on their license amendments, if there has been a request for hearing, then a final NSHC determination must be made before these amendments may be issued.

If there are no hearing' requests, then this SE is acceptable as is in that regard.

Rather than returning this package to OELD for concurrence after necessary modifications, you can call me and (1) if the licensee has agreed to the modifications to its amendment requests'and that is reflected in the SE as noted above and g $gg36 e40518 g

9 ADATDG4-164 PDR

~~

.,_- =-

I 3

r (2)

SECY verifies that there have Leer, no recues.ts for t,_

er 1

these amende:ents,

\\

1 will provide oral concurrence which you may note or, the concurretite sheets.

I I

iray

.R l

h r

i e.

I h

+

e 4

i%

w