ML20105C509

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Spent Fuel Pool Storage.Addl Info Re NSHC Basis Requested

ML20105C509
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Robinson
Issue date:	02/21/1984
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Requa G NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090433
Download: ML20105C509 (1)

Text

__

February 21, 1984 Note to G. Requa

SUBJECT:

ROBINSON 2 - SPENT FUEL POOL STORAGE (0 ELD # 842 136)

~

On this'particular package you should do more on the no significant hazards consideration basis, not just provide the example. What you really need to do on this one is to explain why the restriction on the ten spaces was put in amendment 69. Why weren't they authorized to use all of the spaces in the spent fuel rack. Whatever the reason is, that's what you have to analyze now.. Why was the restriction that was put in then no longer needed and no longer significant? This is the key to the discussion here of significant hazards, this is what you have to first discuss and describe. Then you can either do the-three factors or use an example. The key to this one is what was the original restriction,'why was it put in and why is it no longer relevant now?

Joe Scinto f

v!!!;;;pN66 n,,

1 93 PDg i,q-eu.

_ _ _ a _ _ ;e;. s._,_ _~.- -

,_,.p.,_...

-