ML20105C341

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Reload Margin Requirements.Package Returned for Addl Work

ML20105C341
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Saint Lucie
Issue date:	02/21/1984
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Sells D NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090384
Download: ML20105C341 (1)

Text

.

.._ -. = 27

-1 o

(

February 21, 1984 Note to Don Sells

SUBJECT:

ST LUCIE 1 - RELOAD MARGIN REQUIREMENTS (OELD # 842 099)

I'm returning, for some additional work, the package on the St. Lucie reload.

You should work with Bill Paton to satisfy the comments he made.

I have a separate comment in which there's nothing, I think, that you can do anything about. NRR has to decide what it wants to do on these reload packages. The problem with the reload packages is reflected in the St. Lucie package and its a similar problem in other packages. The Sholly notices are all based on reloads with use of the previously-approved models. When we get to the amend-ment package, the review of-the model changes isn't complete; we have all kinds of comments about their questioning the model capabilities and that's the way the package goes out - with all kinds of holes in it. The SER for the issued amendment attached to this package is inconsistent with the reason we gave for no significant hazards in the original Sholly notice. No one asked

. (

for a hearing but for you guys at some point in time, your conscience should

\\

bother you with respect to putting out notices giving descriptions of no signi-ficant hazards amendments. Then.when you finally do the evaluation, the thing shows.that the assertions you made in the Sholly notice were unfulfilled wishes. No one's asked for _a hearing yet but if anyone did this package would be unacceptable and if anyone finds a way to request a hearing or to challenge

-this. thing, this. package has very little to suport the action.

Joe Scinto cc:

G. Lainas B. Paton W..Olmstead i

8502090384 840518 PDR FOIA

- ADATOS4-166 PDR

=

=

v

="

w w

w,y wqvy-

,,9-ei-w w.

g

--w-

.e-w-,

y-wpy

-ew wgg-.--p----

w-y--

w q--

-c%--r

,yS-ww-.

we--,

y-w-.,--y e--