ML20105C282

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Amend Concerning Staff Working Hours.Lists Two Problems J Scinto Found W/Package.License Amend Needs to Be Renoticed to Fully & Accurately Describe Actual Amend

ML20105C282
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Ginna
Issue date:	03/19/1984
From:	Gray J NRC
To:	Dick G, Smith H NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090364
Download: ML20105C282 (1)

Text

g 3[/fk Note to:

G. Dick-Hazel Smith From:

'J. Gray

SUBJECT:

-GINNA OL AMENDMENT ON STAFF WORKING HOURS

^In a note to Hazel Smith' dated December 22, 1983, Joe Scinto indicated that he had two problems with the attached license amendment package

'concerning Staff working hours at Ginna.

Those problems were:

-(1). that the SER failed to adequately explain the changes to the amendment application-found necessary by the Staff and mutually agreed to by licensee; (2) - that the SER. failed to provide a basis for the.conclusory assertion that the 8/12/83. licensee letter that modified the amendment application was somehow encompassed within the Federal Register notice of the amendment issued on 9/21/83 The revised amendment package appears to take care of item (1) but does

-not adequately address i_ tem (2).

Althou'gh the 9/21/83 Federal Register notice was. published after the.

8/12/83 ' licensee letter modifying the amendment application, there is no mention in the notice of the 8/12/83 modification, no reference to the 8/12/83 letter, and no indication of any kind that the amendment under consideration.was that applied for in April 1983 as modified by the 8/12/83 supplemental application.

In view of this, the 9/21/83 Federal

- Register notice did not give proper and adequate notice to the public of

!the. amendment being considered.. Unless you can explain in the SER just how it-is that the public was apprised of the 8/12/83 amendment modification by the 9/21/83 Federal Register notice, that notice appears-insufficient to notify the' public of the actual amendment being

-considered. Absent such a demonstration in the SER, this license amendment needs to be renoticed so as~to fully and accurately describe the actual amendment we are considering.

[

G ay p-ADATOS4-166 PDR p

h 2