ML20105C122

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package.Press Release Notice on Package Will Be Issued

ML20105C122
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, LaSalle
Issue date:	12/29/1983
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Eisenhut D NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090319
Download: ML20105C122 (1)

Text

r -

p

(

December 29, 1983 Note to Darrell Eisenhut

SUBJECT:

LASALLE We are going to put out a press release notice on this package for LaSalle.

The notice would be okay provided that the time for coninents is changed so that it gives at least 15 days worth of public comment time. You can't cut it off on January 3, even though it may run into an overlap with the tech specs.

Someone has to work that out between us and the Region with respect to

-issuance of mistaken tech specs on Unit 2.

You can't fix it by cutting out the public comment period.

Secondly, the argument that the Staff gives for an exigency.is that slow starting of the diesel is so good that from a safety standpoint,'we want to reduce the number of fast starts as quickly as we possibly can.

If that's the argument the Staff wants to make, it sounds to me like we ought to get the generic letter on fast start out of here right away.

C

.It seems a little inconsistent to put this kind of argument out in a press release when we, as an agency have been doing surveys, etc to get around to changing the fast start tech specs on all the other plants that we imposed. We can't use this argument to justify a short notice for a change of tech spec on 60 power plant's that are out there.

The only thing that distinguishes LaSalle is that we jumped the gun on issuing

.the slow start spec on LaSalle 2 before we looked at its effect on LaSalle 1.

In short we, and the licensee probably, screwed up.

I'm not sure you want to make this argument as your public argument just to correct the mistake that

-was made in the LaSalle 2 license. We could put out a regular notice and ask the Region & I&E not to enforce the inconsistent tech spec for the period necessary to carry out the proper procedure for the change.

' Original signed by L

J. F. Scinto'f Joe Scinto e(

19 840518 ADATOS4-166 PDR m