ML20105C101

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Fuel Concentration Limits.Does Not Agree That Tech Specs Can Be Modified to Allow Possession of Higher Fuel W/O Authorizing Subsequent Use in Core

ML20105C101
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	09/26/1983
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Brian Lee, John Miller NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090313
Download: ML20105C101 (1)

Text

~

September 26, 1983 r

flote to: Jim-Miller Bob Lee

SUBJECT:

ARKA!45AS 2 FUEL C0!!CDITRATIO!! LIMITS (0 ELD #837040) l

. I do not agree with this package at all. This package is purportedly going to aciend Section 5 of the Tech Specs to change the fuel concen-l tration limits described in Section 5 and then subsequently they're going to do a 50.59 analysis of the core using the higher enrichment fuel. fio go. The change of concentration in the fuel is for use in the core. This is a change that has to be authorized in connection with an authorization to use that fuel. I cannot agree that you can modify the tech spec to allow the possession of the higher fuel with-out intrinsic 1y authorizing its subsequent use in the core. The guys are not allowed to possess fuel just for the laughs. They're

{

allowed to possess fuel only for use in the cora. Unless you're ready to authorize use in the core, you should not separate out the i

actions so that the eventual use of this fuel in the core is treated under 50.59. That is not acceptable. This may be the applicant's request and if-that's the applicant's request. I want some description of this in the notice - that this is a request for modification of o

i the fual possession limit. This is not a modification which authorizes fuel in the core. Subsequently, after the Sho11y notice, this request should be denied. This is not an acceptable request, to separate out possession and the subsequent use in the core.

Joe Scinto

~

~

s

(.

khk'fjl304051s ADATOe4-166 77 een P