ML20105C079

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re RHR Shutdown Cooling Valves & Isolation Signal.Practice Represented by Package Must Be Discontinued

ML20105C079
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Susquehanna
Issue date:	11/09/1983
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Novak T NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090308
Download: ML20105C079 (1)

Text

Y

,.9:'

November 9,1983 s: y,

t flote to Tom Novak

SUBJECT:

SUSQUEHAN!IA RHR-SHUTDOWN C00LIllG VALVES... ISOLATI0?l SIGNAL (OELD # 838 910)

The practice represented by this package just cannot continue. It is unacceptable to take this long between authorizing a change of technical specifications by phone and getting around to finishing the paper work.

There is just no excuse for this.

If it was that much of an emergency on October 7 and you were.able to complete your analysis to conclude that it was safe and involved no significant hazards on October 7 there is no excuse for this taking virtually a month to get over to ELD. These are the packages, the only packages, that warrant treatment as an ugent package in ELD.

The practice represented by this package has to stop.

1 m

1 e Scinto h}

il J.

o ll j

. e; 4.

e m a

w ll

.l t J,,.'

Jf i 3 ~ ~-

I I

t M e "

, '-

• 3- :

ll

?,

I' '.

,,1 3 f l

.s.

3 7,

s.

i 8502090308 840518 PDR FOIA

.ADATOB4-166 PDR l'

+

1

i i

C a

7,b,

v t n-

^

November 9.1983

' yy N-flote to Mike Wilcove

SUBJECT:

TitI-2 TANKAGE USED TO STORE WASTE WATER (OELD # 838 774)

Mike, my problem with this package is - what are the facts? If Metro-politan Edison Company requested an amendment to the license governing TMI and requested an amendment which affects matters other than ownership characteristics (how the plant is operated), then my problem is I think we have an inadequate amendment request. In this docket, what is the organization that is authorized to submit license application amendments?

I don'_t know. It should be a part ofthbe license file. Who is authorized

+

to submit request for codifications of the license? When we changed from liet Ed as the operator to GPU as the operator, what did the pieces of paper say about that? This is the question I have - who is the authorized

(-

connunicator with this Agency? Het Edi GPU... ? My concern is not with the boiler plate words in the amendnent - my concern is what it is that we're doing. Are we acting on the basis of a request submitted by the wrong organization? That's my problem.

rW.'

/ Joe Scinto P

I ll 6

4

.a

'y jf.- [, a e~

-dyc x

w

. c:L

.