ML20105B989

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Amend to Licenses NPF-9 & NPF-17 to Exempt from App R,Iii.J Emergency Lighting Requirement.Oeld Concurrence Not Recommended
ML20105B989
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire, 05000000
Issue date: 12/22/1983
From: Rawson R
NRC
To: Scinto J
NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090284
Download: ML20105B989 (1)


Text

.

December 22, 1983 Note to:

J. Scinto From:

R. Rawson MCGUIRE AMENDMENT PACKAGE CONCERNING AMENDME

SUBJECT:

REQUIREMENT This package appears straightforward on its surface, but conc

(" Emergency Lighting") requirements the Safe Shutdown Facility and nevertheless.

The justification given for the proposed NSHCD access and egress routes.

is that " implicit in the requirement for the 8-hour battery-powered c

emergency lights... is the assumption that a fire could simultaneously disable the existing emergency lights and safe shutdown equipment.".Th justification would be valid if the SSF were intended only for the If the SSF situation of a fire disabling the normal shutdown equip

(

. \\

regulation is the assumption that a fire could disable existing emergency lights at a time when the SSF is otherwise neede If the SSF at McGuire is required for situations othe I also wonder consequences of an accident or reduce a margin of safety.This rationale wo about the precedent being set here.

.?

to every SSF in the country.

I recommend that ELD not concur in this package in its present form.

T h

f

.//_

R.R.

L

/

C,v F

j,

~

cc:

J. Gray s

i; B502090284 84051G PDR FOIA ADATOB4-166 PDR

/M

,,g emm e-

.e.

age __

6 h-QN