ML20105B897

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Elimination of App B to Tech Specs.Action Not Taken on Nonradiological Tech Spec Changes
ML20105B897
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/30/1984
From: Scinto J
NRC
To: Tam P
NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090268
Download: ML20105B897 (1)


Text

.

a.-

.w x.----

(

January 30, 1984 Note to Peter Tam

SUBJECT:

BEAVER VALLEY 1 - ELIMINATION OF APPENDIX B TO TECH SPECS (OELD # 841 189)

This. package is-okay but I noticed one thing in it and that is we are not taking action on the non-radiological tech spec changes yet on the basis that we expect to see that changed, so therefore the prenotice only covers the radiological portions of the spect that we're deleting. That's okay but you should leave it in that status only if you really think that the Licensee is going to make that change really quickly.

You shouldn't let the Licensee have a proposed amendment or even a part of a proposed amendment request in this Agency for any extended period of time without this Agency taking some action to publish it, withdraw it, or to have them change it. Tell the Licensee to either get off the dime or to withdraw it promptly. We can't have these amend-ments hanging around.

It makes it appear that this Agency is lax in doing its

(

job when in fact the problem is that licensees request amendments that they don't really want. Have them withdraw it unless they're going to make a request for that change soon.

oe Scinto l

i i

1 i[

i f

't

('8502090268840518 PDR FOIA ADATOB4-166 PDR

/lb o

.