ML20105B882
| ML20105B882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Ginna |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1983 |
| From: | Scinto J NRC |
| To: | Smith H NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20102A920 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090264 | |
| Download: ML20105B882 (1) | |
Text
?
December 22, 1983 Note to Hazel Smith
SUBJECT:
GINNA STAFF WORKING HOURS & REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (840295)
Hazel, the attempt in the cover letter to explain away the mutually agreed-to changes is fine but there has to be something in the SER which discusses them and explains why its no problem.
I don't see anything in the SER. The next
- thing is, we didn't even notice the letter of August 12 at all. The SER on page.3 appears to discuss the August 12 letter indicating that the Licensee agreed to submit some changes to be made.in the future. Consequently, it was modified and these are changes within the scope of the prenotice. That's a statement. You need some support for that assertion. We apparently told them
- thattheinformationsubmittedintheonewenoticed(April)wasinadequate and we needed more information. That's what this thing appears to say - that the infor1 nation submitted with the original request was inadequate.
In that case we should have denied it. We cannot simply assert that the August sub-mittal and the April application (which we noticed) are all the same. We need some support for that and I'm not sure there is any.
Joe Scinto
_h-1
-? 4 '
A,.
. D TOS PDR t-JAA ew Q_ e "
- y?
H-
~ * *
- v