ML20105B828

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Containment Leak Testing Surveillance.Tech Spec Does Not Adequately Reflect Requirements of Regulation.Sts Will Be Modified to Conform to Requirements of Regulations

ML20105B828
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Brunswick
Issue date:	12/22/1983
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Grotenhuis M, Vassallo D NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090254
Download: ML20105B828 (1)

Text

g

'F t

December 22,.1983 Note to M. Grotenhuis D. Vassallo

SUBJECT:

BRUNSWICK CONTAINMENT LEAK TESTING SURVEILLANCE (840291)

I don't have problems with the package; what I have problems with is the tech

-spec. The tech spec (page 346-3) indicates that if any two consecutive type "A" test fail, the retest shall be performed at least every 18 months until two tests pass.' In this package, we are extending it to allow the 18 months

- to be plus or minus 25%. That doesn't bother me.

What does bother me is that the tech spec is written wrong. The regulation requires that the tests be done every shutdown for refueling or approximately every 18 months, whichever is earlier (J.3. A.6.B.).

For this reason, the tech spec does not adequately reflect the requirements of the Regulation.

It

- is an inappropriate tech spec.

If that is a standard tech spec, then please supply a copy of this note to Mr. Brinkman and I will request Mr. Brinkman to modify the standard tech specs C,

so that they conform to the requirements of the Regulations, oe Scinto

-cc:

W. Olmstead 1

s 5

0405fs PDR

' fj6 n.;., -

---.-n m.*---- -

-.m- -

-. ~. - -- ~-+++

-~-

+7

- -- + s t e

i December 22, 1983 Note to Hazel Smith

SUBJECT:

BIG ROCK MECHANICAL SNUBBERS (840375)

This is another package with an after-the-application change. There is an assertion that says this was discussed with the Licensee and they approved.

The cover letter says that its within the scope of the original amendment.

There is no support for that in the SER. There has to be some support for that assertion. The Staff has to stop making changes to these applications or the changes have to be very minor and they have to be explained as very minor.

Joe Scinto

(

js 1

M

) ^

6

/4/

q, s u a, a,+ 1 w OEYe- ~, v-

[

g r :=.

- - ?. -,.- := ;....=. -. :a-,,.

, a -.

=7 -

. ~ ~ ~ ~.. -.

• * '~,

T.~,~~T::'