ML20102B325

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package.Justification Should Be Considered for Exigency as Author Had Subj Package Since 830418
ML20102B325
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, North Anna
Issue date: 05/06/1983
From: Scinto J
NRC
To: Lainas G
NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090185
Download: ML20102B325 (1)


Text

.. _. -.......

._..__.._;..-=

(

May 6,1983 Note to Gus Lainas.

SUBJECT:

EXIGENT PACKAGE FOR NORTH ANNA This is the first exigent package.

It should be carefully reviewed by you and by Mr. Eisenhut. In addition, you should get Mr. Fouchard's

' concurrence. You should also return it to OELD for Mr. Cunningham's review..

You should carefully consider justification for the exigency in view of the fact that we have had this package since 4/18. You should also consider whether the problem results from an excessively restrictive interpretation by the applicant of the license condition. (Why an insitu calibration for a vendor calibrated instrument?).

Also look carefully at the condition to see whether there is in fact an operability requirement as strict as he licensee apparently thinks.

Scinto lj.

Ed Christenbury /

i.

cc:

!li f

e

' [.-

PDR FOIA 8502090185'840518 ADATOS4-166 PDR 7

.~

. _. -. -