ML20090E584

Confirms Discussions Between Ny Health Dept & Util on 700309 & Provides Basis for Control for Chemical Wastewater Discharges at Unit

ML20090E584
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	03/11/1970
From:	Seebald E HUDSON RIVER FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION
To:	Woodbury H CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC.
References
NUDOCS 8304040065
Download: ML20090E584 (6)

Text

'

g NEW YORK STATE CONSER'JATION DEPTwATT: MR. ~ BENTLEY 7

/

U

,,;,... n u Jha/U

. \\

..; ' g.ni March 11, 1.970

/pj;,.,, ()

A

' a c...,

.2

.i,

.. ~

narry G. Woodhury senior Vice President

~ Central 0,)aratiens Consalidated Edicon Company of Neu York, Inc.

4 Irving Placc Ken York, Mcw 1'ork 10003 f

.Y.,..h

Dear Mr. Woodbury:

2 Thic letter is to confira diccunnions bet.voan the State Health Departmcat cud Concolidated Edicon in con ~crcnco.

March 9,1970 sad prov.ide the basic of control for chenient

./

c' wastcuator dicchargco at the Indian Po;*nt #2 nucicar reactor.

1.

Control of, respcasibility for, cad liabiitty resulting Cicm.any dicciv:rges rest with the Ccnaolidated 34 son Company.

.g 2.

No concentr.:ted unsh solutions shall be dischnrged without appropriate treatment.

3.

All chemien1. compounds uced in the alkalino, ccid and passivation operations chalb be complotoly identified.

4.

Concentraticns of all cheinicals and ions chall

~

be deccznited and reported prior to any release t.o the circulating

~

water systcc.

weQ gg

~5.

Allowablo of fluent conceritrations chall bo based' wtVtL Rg on the lesser concent.ratione detcraincd neceptable frau either o

.n (n) m: tor quality aspc.ctc, or (b) toxicity to Jgx crivatic ort,snisb.a.

..d o<

kg 6.

Sampling for compliance to allotmble Units vill.

. coa.<

bo cdaducted at the confluence of tho sheet-pile dischargo canal,.

and. the Hudcon River.

~q

..,\\

s

t

,.j

gg.,.,4niery lr =

, su:.n ~

g pa p.

..wrea u,

tw..,

.;.3 v

i

\\

f.

Alle.<nbic conecuerat!. cec acsceo hemcaenos,

o tri*tif.g D0t900n tha rin30 in-ter and (* nit ?l.cir0ulatin(t,c.$,,, ',

uator discha. rte.

cor,plian;c uilt be c3 scared base ( ca tb r.nnim.o conecatrations ne cny point et, the cancl couth cua i.,.g i

t.ho aversp.o conditfoa.

G.

The car. hod of ::ccuring, hoogenocca mixing be:.4.q, the rinso t.'acc dicchargo and circulating coolins voter is e constructica'probica of Consolidated tidicoa Ccapany.

9.

F20 fora dischargc of any rJnco. unter the colution vill do nixed foc hcassencity to inwi*e that samplos cre repre-sentative of contents., cud dischcrl;o reficctivo of adopling rczuits.

1

.c

..g I

i 10.

Eio-acacyc ulll be condue:cd by Conectidated Edison Company on the cihalino unch solution pra,soccd for contro11cd rolecca utilising native fish populations sad Hudson River.kater.

11.

Bio-escaya vill bc conducted using,=cthodology acceptablo to the Ucw York Stato consetvntion Departmonc..

s 12.

Alloca51a usritata nffluent concentrationa, based on water quclitj, of nitros.cn en n, and phosphorous os ?, sro 2.0.

' - K. g c3/1 and 0.5 :aa/l respectivaly.

13.

l.cid'unsh cnd pcseivation operationo ah:11 not be l~

[c.(.) con?.tetod unlesc cdequate on-site storece is. cvaitchic for l

cc:gicto rotent.ica oC rcculcant teach waterc.

v a.

j@

Dischcrgo ratoc will be dotorcined bcned upon the 14.

s 1:act restrictive water quality or toricity control uich cn oppropricto factor of =cfc:.y.

15.

There chall be na dhchcrwo of any colutions without prior notificeccion. of tho &v York. Staco Domect:ent oC Eccl.th nnd a dcccrutant.icn by the New 'g'cri:. 3:nto Departe:ca of H:cith 'cr the cceeptability orche propoucd diccharao roque:tc.

ce

• t -

w a,

.k 3

.d a

~

g 8

.I

.I

'! *1

. )

g3

/s o

j tiarci 11, ' 1 *.>7 0 [] -

.g.

Cv~c tic aboervntians OC d-1.nebarg.ca nw] r.r.c 31ios. of the di.scharte t.> the iludeo;; P.!vec vill. be conA.ccw: by pern'mnel. -

. of. bathi the 1;c.4 Yor'.: St. ate I:ccit.h i.opartment..Uhite.Plahm !!osf oust Ho

.0/ffico, nn.! t he tier.tchoctor County repartte. cat. of licolth.

5 'I dit.cbart,o shall be caanonced uJ chout. the prior no:It'ichcisn of both these off1ces.

<..e.;:..,

The :t.v.scoprietc ocaalo to cont r.ct. crc.

't Thea.w F.. Quinn, Acting, Chief

.,itz,

.#.S 1: ?" '

2ndustrial F*.ciltty Section

7. A i

New York Statc Dealth :Np.dtnent, Albany s.,..

John Iberican f

.r.

.f

-2c:;ionat Gn3 acer

' c Scv Yor:. Str.te Health Departcent Uhito Plainn llezional Offico, White Plains-i Cr.lvi.n 'd.1 ch-Director, Divicion' of. viiora2ntai Sanit.ccion

/-

t Uostchector Count.y licolth* bcpartcant, Whi.ec Pictns Very truly yours,

'ixcor.a F. flocbald, P 6.

~

Associato T:fractor Division of Purc Watern 4

f.VS:TEQ: FC

. cc.

G. Co::hord, Can. Ed., ;icw York

~

F

9. F.cTLucc,, Con. F.J., P.uchcrian hbite Plains i egional Of fice, Att:

Mr.11errison

' k'estchcoter County Health Oc'sarte.ent, fat. - 1;r. Weber Er. Eentley.

• l'ew Yor'. f.catic Conticrvation Doportcent - At.t:

. a.,.

c g

9-s% '

m

- t

. ;,n v.

s s

e I

,7..

,,4 I

j,

.'l.

^

s

.O O

/

a 1

t

/

HUDSON HIVER FISIIERMEN'S ASSOCIATION Refuse Act outline

} 46 o 1g99 san 2s

p. W>.u.~.~...~..........

Ossinin8, New York 10562 9

s r...................

a notary or other officer authorized to administer oaths,

1. What is Prohibited and Where The 1800 Refuse Act is a setting forth; pow;rful, but little used, weapon in the Federal arsenal of water (a) the nature of the refuse material discharged;.

pollution control enforcement legislation. Section 13 of the Act (b) the source and method of discharge; (Titti 33, United States Code, section 407) prohibits anyune.

(c) the location, name, and address of the person or including any individual, corporation, municipality, or group.

persons causing or contributing to the discharge; from throw...g. discharging, or depositing any refuse matter of (d) the name of the waterway into which the dis-any kind or any type from a vessel or from a shore based buifding, charge occurrr J:

structure, or facdity into either (a) the nation's navigable rivers, (e) each date on wnich the discharge occurred; takes, streams, and other navigable bodies of water, or (b) any (f) the names and addresses of all persons known to tributary to such waters, unless he has first obtained a permit to y u, including yourself, who saw or knows about do so. Nasigable water includes wat'er suf ficient to float a boat or the discharges and could testify about them if log it high water This section of the Act applies to inland waters, "C"SSU'YI co:stal waters, and waters that flaw across the boundaries of the (g) a statement that the discharge is not authorized Unit;d States and Canada and Mexico.

by Corps permit, or, if a permit was granted, The term " refuse" has been broadly defined by the Supreme state f acts showmg that the alleged violator is not Court to include solids, chemicals, oils, and other liquid poi, complying with any condition of the permit; lut nts. The only materials excepted from this general prohibition (h) if the waterway into which the discharge oc-are those flowing from streets, such as from storm sewers, and curred is not commonly known as navigable, or fr:m municipal sewers, which pass into the waterway in liquid as a tributary to a navigable waterway, state facts form.

to show such status;

11. Permits to Discharge Section 13 of the Act authoriics the (i) Where possible, photographs should be taken, Secretary of the Army, acting through the Corps of Engineers, to and samples of the pollutant or foreign substance permit the deposit of material into navigable waters under cond;.

collected in a clean jar which is then sealed.

tions prescribed by him. Regulatiots gove ning the issuance of These should be labeled with information show-permits are pi.blished in Title 33 of t% Code of Federal Regula.

ing who took the photograph or sample, where, tions, Part 209.

and when, and how; and who retained custody of 111, Penalty f or Violations - Violations of the Refuse Act are the film jar.

subject to criminal prosecution and pena ties of a fine of not more than S2.500 nor less than $500 for each day or instance of C, When a citizen furnished information to the U.S.

violation, or imprisonment for not less than 30 days nor more Attorney for the purpose of aiding in the prosecution of violators of the Refuse Act for past discharges, the citizen than 1 ycor, or both a fine and imprisonment (Title 33, United States Code. Section 411). A citizen who informs the appro-should also urge the U.S. Attcrney to seek injunctions priat2 United States attorney about a violation and gives suf-under the same Act to preclude future dischar5as, or other ficient information to lead to conviction is entitled to one-half of orders to require the dischargers to remove pollutants the fine set by the court. (See section V of this outline.)

already discharged. More frequent use of this authority by IV. Procedure for Citizen to-Seck Enforcement of Refuse the Government, together with criminal sanctions, will Act A. The citizen having information about any discharge of.

have lasting pollution control results.

rufuse mto navigable waters should Ost ascertain whether V." Qui Tam" suits Where a statute, such as the Refuse Act, O the ducharge is authorized by Corps permit. If a permit is provides that part of a fine shall be paid to citizens who furnish in effect, the citizen shculd endeavor to ascertain whether suf ficient information of a violation to lead to a conviction of the the permittee is comply;ng with its terms. This informa-violator, and the Government fails to prosecute within a reason-R tion can be obtained from the appropriate office of the able period of time, the informer can bring his own suit, in the S Corps of Engineers with jurisdiction over the particular name of the Government, against the violator to collect his p waters into which the discharge occurs. Such information portion of the penalty. This is called a " qui tam" suit. The in-is avaDable to the public under the Freedem of Informa* former has a financial interest in the fine and therefore can sue to 3il tion Act (5 U.S. Code 552; Public Law 90 23),

collect it. The Supreme Court has upheld such qui tam suits.

S. The Refuse Act specifically directs that the appropri-Some of these decisions are cited in the Report of the House ate United States attorney shall " vigorously prosecute all Committee on Government Operations (House Report 91917, g

3 of fenders." (Title 33, United States Code, seclion 413 ) in March 18,1970) entitial "Our Waters and Wetlands: How the

$ order to do so he needs adequate informatIon to prove Corps of Engineers can help prevent their Destruction and Pol-

@ that the discharges were made and that they vio;ated the lution."

E law or the conditions of the permit. Furfhermore, the The United States district courts apparently have exclusive h statute specifies that the citizen's right to Qne-half of the jurisdiction to hear and decide such suits. (Title 28, United States j fine is conditioned on his providing to the/U.S. Attorney Code, section 1355.) In such a qui tam suit, the citizen must i

information sufficient to / cad to a cony /crion of the prove that the alleged vio:ator did,in fact, violate the Act.

violator.

/I If the citizen should lose the suit, he probably would have to in providing information to the U.. Attorney, the bear the cost of suing including his lawyer's fees.

cntizen should make a detailed statement worn to before Outline courtesy of Rep. M havr Harrington (O. Moss.1 i

a

L n

b, V

g@%q Q

9 HUDSON RIVER FISIIERMEN'S ASSOCIATION h

Box' 725 3 ~d 9 _ D Ossining, New York 10562

. 3

. ::::::::= g

= :.=::::.-

33,085,296 l

WASHINGTON.D.C.

Check No.

SY M B O t. 3002 3 as.g gs.go.. o.r.

pi..

G' A,, " " DamiraufildnitsSlala ef

> e PAYTOTjlE i l

'w om.,

cg h. g i OpDE,ROlHUCSCh RIVER FISHERFENS ASSN 5**20CC CC

!)b rm un ggg 09 16 70 C/C kHITNEY NORTH SEYNOUR JR TREASURY i f ESC ACCOUNTS N

NEh NY 10007 Sports IHustrated h,

ocTossais,so7e Fishermen Get $2,000 for Pollution Case Help SCORE By CRAIG R. WIIITNEY IU* S' Shares Penn Cenfrc!' times t stop discharging the waste material.

The Federal Government gave the Hudson RMr Fisher, fine With Nadson Group According to the suit, sludge men's Association a eneck for O'1 parts of the floor of Foun-

$2.000 yesterday for its help in That Cape In[ormation dry Cove has a cadmium con-Edited by ROBERT CREAMER obtaining a conviction of the tent of as much as 17 parts Pm Central railroad for pol-i per hundred, which. If not re-lutmg t'n riverat Harmon N.Y. yesterday against a battery moved, could flow into the Hud.

MUTINY wlTH A BOUNTY

.,h David Sive. the lawyer for: company in Cold Spring N. Y.,' son for many years.

But mark up a victory for conservation,-

6 t; the group. said that as far as,for allegedly dumping cadmium.

The maximum amount of cad-too' When we.left the Hudson River 1:M he or United States Attorney.a poisonous heavy metal, into mium permitted in drinking Whitney North Seymour Jr.j Foundry water by the United States Fishermerfs Association (SI, Feb.16), -

could destmine a private or.! udsen m, Cove, an inlet of the ig H

Putnam County.

Public Health Service is 0.01 the Penn Central Railroad had pleaded.

%. e ganizatkn had never beforel The suit. against Marathon; parts per million, the suit says.

guilty and paid $4,000 in fines for dis-l9 been givca ; art of a fine in al general manager,yM. L. Cas jThe location of Foundry Covecharging oil into the Hudson at Har-Battery Compan and its

.N pollution cre under the Refuse is well downstream from any iO Act of ITM The fishermen's sotta, seeks a court order to point at wh!ch the Hudson mon, N.Y. Yet members of the HRFA, 2

organization had given the force the company to stnp let-is used m water supplies, Mr.

who had for years screamed-about the i

aM Government mformation that ting ca:imium and other refuse Seymour said.

railr ad's v. lation of the 1899 Federal io M

had led to the prosecution, escape into the river and to.His grand jury investigation,

'C Mr. Seymour, who presented dredge the cove to remove what he explaiced, would be co-Refuse Act, were near revolt. A little-the money to Mr. Sivo at the is there already.

ordinated with the work of known clause in this seldom-enforced

, p/,

ic Federal Court House in Foley Like many Federal prosecu-both state and local govern-law says that half of any,ne shall be p

Square said the railroad had tions of polluters, this one was ment agencies, but was started

,Q pitaded guilty last October, be-based on information provided because of

• increasing concern paid to the person or persons reporting

'M fore Mr. Seymour took office, by another Government with the effectiveness of exist-the polluter, but some federal officials O

to discharrin; fuel oil into the agency, in this case the Army ing enforcement in the water were irying to pretend the HRFA had river, and had been fined Corps of Enginees, which, ac. poilution field." No specific tar, nothing to do w,th the case. Now j,us-

- [;

$t000.

cording to the suit, had warned gets of the grand jury were i

Mr. Sive said h:.s group would he Marathtn company three mentioned.

tice has triumphed. U.S. Attorney Whit-t

.n k

ncy North Seymour Jr.of New York pre-ntin e i wo k gain po1

,6 lution of the Hudson.

sented the HRFA with a treasury check for 52,000. According to Seymour, a new

'M New Investigation Begun

)

Mr. Seymour announced that li h

ph appointee who himself urged the Gov.

a N= ld!!.La[k ly M

8 special Federal grand jury d

crnment to pay up, this is the first time was empaneled yesterday to be.

"i" gM a private group has ever received the to gin an investigation of viola-Q p

bounty ordered by Congress 71 years M

tions of the Federal water pol.

M lution laws in southern New ago.Said a happy Richard Garrett pres-y York State, the judicial district' ident of the HRFA: "We're going to c

ed ny Mr. Seymour's W W OO m @ O W m

'E

, Ha is.bnown as a conserva-g Gh dl f ' j';

gQ I

, but what's really important is not the tionist by avocation and has es-.

amount but the precedent. Now other tabbshed a special antipollution' ly section of five prose:utors in people on any other body of water m his office.

1 the country can go after a polluter just; i

-The special unit brought siJt as we did and collect a reward for their A

troubles." -

m-

/

p

' *

• i t

u s

g Q:

IIUDSON RIVER FISIIERMEN'S ASSOCIATION "f

Box 725

\\.

..C..............

f Ossining, New York 10562 N

s 8

NEW YORKER I

!g::a' e ( a$ -O Qvg

' **/

,s

• \\1

.w;,f.:'.A

&Wl.f"

. a.y.

r,

?

sk

,)

,,f? N ~ $

'? y

.lQl.n. '

@ %l}':yh,

n\\

Q e/

3' c.'

t s

i

• n.

Q,.

f.--

x ')i

}

!)

=

l l

N)

'{

- THE NEW YORK TIMES, 3

h y

TUESDA Y MARCH 17,1970

?

ll 7~

c&

Con Ed Says a i

-\\

It May Be Forced

\\.

In answer to questions about-i b

' fish kills near the Indian Point

[

nuclear plant. Mr. Luce 3ald there had been no nuclear con-tamination involved and he of-fered to replace the more than 200.000 fish estimated to have

['

been killed in two separate in.

cidents since Jan.1.

that with "hindninnt

e enm-

?

pany cou]d have done more to prevent such events.

F We have only been screaming for 4), -

SEVEli -(7)

YEARSIII e, x h.q

,W v ;

'r p

i, f.

%' M '., ' j

?w..D< m.W)

~.

l W

t \\.

l 1

.g e 3 0

YW

WQ$h,h

~

,WLAW ' s,.

ck.

i I.T%

d "iS 7

ig._1. e$n/:

N

)

g v d, '

J e

s x-o i

L s

Ngbvhgygg

\\

C.

4 s

c

}

g h

1

- i ij i

)

3 0

\\

,,/

q'

-> f,,' 96 -

J

._ SN t

\\

':Q'.,-.s0 1 0

/

00 t

1 cc' k> ), & @ccf g,,Q ~ c6?r?,. --

's-h y

8 g n.

e. c..

cryWw c.

w

~y i

"So that's *where it goes! Well, Pd like to thank you fello ws for bringing this to my attention.

,