ML20081H008

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Case Position for Record Re NRC Contact Concerning Case/Tu Electric/Nrc Joint Stipulation
ML20081H008
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 05/30/1991
From: David Kern
Citizens Association for Sound Energy, TURLEY, W., PC
To: Johari Moore
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
Shared Package
ML20081H000 List:
References
CON-#291-11810 NUDOCS 9106140059
Download: ML20081H008 (3)


Text

__

na um,.. n, G,, ; -

W t N I)

  • TU R t,1W, l'.C.

'91 tg 3) P4 20 at vonwt vs wwas nmtav wiu469 u JONt6 c e m,o mv ~ A

...u.

a w.iesvic+

unie u.ev asev t UNL4 TV.44 %

.aD8N R DSM,

.m u o,,,e,,,6...ts*t u 4

om.3,.

w =o.,

..o

.m usw n A, gl.g g Ag t g AAg 9gygg we. w t e eeu w saw n ne" cem.. mv no.,,maa n uaewuAamw a~e t a axia's

,ue eo eia nei me ne

  • e e erv'e.6,4 un y e.vy g p4M6 AW(4 8 AiAAmbe tes.,$ A we the 4 Wec.tA&L e W8ff.ke

, eses e a >< 's he et a4 ait u.,

wha,. Ah4b 4 L 8 m 6 mi.4 b4 a ang,a 44a Asynt gitDM( ATH 64 W'W 4 b*f *km4 %Aam.psus

$ TOfsh tWV uose pay $6.u 6ersha fat 4 4 A4 & Nawa 42 NrW E D#

, e,

1 RbC h 4 s.sApry 1ph% 4 W 1 A,.if 4A k8. AN

,a 5 e wac au -

1.','!f:0 May 30, 1991 Mn. Janice Moore, Esq.

Officu of Conera1 Counnel U.S. Nuclear Roqulatory Commission Wanhington, DC 20555 RE:

comancho peak Steam Electric Station, Unita 1 and 2, Micky Dow Allegations, Docket Hos. 50-445 and 50-446 Dear Ms. Mooret CASE received from the NRC a copy of the recent letter from Micky Dow to the commienion dated May 17, 1991, alleging that he han possession of cortain tapen containing information indicativo of "a nituation of duplicity and compromino between (HRC) Region IV and TU Electric, an well as.

C.A.S.E. (sic)."

We are providing CASE's position for the record to you, an CASEIN HRC contact regarding the CASE /TU Electric /NRC Staf f Joint Stipulation.

CASE categorically denios Mr. Dow'n allogationn about CASE and welcomes thu Commission'n attempts to make public thouc tapes.

Becauno CASE has no knowledge of the contents of thone tapon, we cannot expreso an opinion at thiu poitu as to which branch of thu HRC (01, 01G, NRH) would be most proper to review the tapes.

However, regard 1onn of which branch performs this task, CASE now goon on record an strongly urging that theso tapen be reviewed by an appropriate branch of the NRC and mado public, security interesto permitting, as quickly as pocnible.

9106140059 910531 FDR ADOCK 0b000445 O

UDR

J Ms. Janice Moore, Tag.

Hay 29, 1991 pagu Two For the record, CASI: would note that itn entire track history in ennpletuly inconnistont with Mr. Dow'n allegationn.

Inaddition,theNRCSta{fhan inventigated allegationn regarding CASE, and found, in part :

"With respect to the genural uettlomont agreement betwoon thn partiou to the proceeding, an required by the agreement, CASE han been given and han taken an active part in monitoring the activities at the Comancho Peak sito.

CASE han made both TU Elcetric and the NRC awarn of innues l

which are of conenrn to CASE.

Thornfore, the_sntklenentJ1ana.in i

f uk_ r e s 019Ci DJ h w_G Q!tt i ny l.119_rt 00 l Rt i O O_0 L84DAt YJ IW u t s prt u u nt_9 thy.f,AS E, and CrUR's allegation in this area is without perit."

(Empnanin added.)

More recently, the HRC rucognized the ynar-plus effortn of CASE in regard to the CASE disputn filed regarding neoliny l

calculations.

TheNHCissungaNoticeofViolationtoTU Electric and ntated, in part t "Thie violation involven a failure of TV Electric'n corrective action program in 1960 and 1907 to assure that allegod deficiencico with scaling documentation for initial sotup and calibration of inntrumentation loops were promptly pursuud and identified.

The NRC in concerned that it requirod significant involvement from a former employeu and from CASE over an extended period beforo the doficiencies wit.h scaling documentation were adequatoly identified and corrected."

In addition, the NRC in aware of CASE's continued Vork with whistlebloweru, otton on a confident.ial banis, to help annure that their safety-related concerns are addropued and renolved.

As stated previounly, CASE ntrongly urgon that the tapen in the ponusssion of Micky Dow be reviewod and mado public an quickly an ponnible no that the facts can be brought. out.

lang January 30, 1990, letter from James E.

Lyonn, Chairman, NRC Allegation Review Committee, to Mrs. Hotty Hrink, Hoard Humber, citir.ons for Fair Utility Hegulations (CrUR), Subject Allegation OSP 89-A-0089, pagen 10-13.

2St3 Tobruary 26,

1991, lettor from Samuol J.
Collins, Director, NRC Division of Roactor Projects, to W.J. Cahill, Jr., TV Electric Exocutive Vice Prouldent, Nuclear, Inupection Roport 50-445/90-47 50-446/90-47 (see alno Fobruary 27, 1991, lutter from Christopher I.

Grimes, Acting Assintant Director for Hoqionn IV and V Reactorm, Divinion of Reactor projects - III/IV/V, itRC Ot fice of Nuclear Hunctor Hogulation, to CASE Prnuident Juanita Ellin.

_,___,.___,,_,_._,.-..__.__.,.,y..__

4.

i I

Ms. Janice Moore. Eng.

May 29, 1991 Pago Thren l

i I

I If you have any quantionn, pleano contact either Hrn. Ellin l

i or no.

With kind regards, j

!JsW OITICES Or WINDLE TUHLEY, P.C.

t. y l

DapdL.Korn DLK/ao i

co Cant Board of Directurn George Edgar Nicky Dow l

i

?

o l

1 I

r l

r i

4 I

1

. - ~

.L-

_. _ _ - -