ML20056G796

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-458/93-24 on 930726-30 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Licensee Physical Security Program Including Records & Repts
ML20056G796
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/1993
From: Murray B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20056G789 List:
References
50-458-93-24, NUDOCS 9309070176
Download: ML20056G796 (3)


See also: IR 05000458/1993024

Text

._ _ __

. l

!

DOCUMENT CONTAINS

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

!

APPENDIX B

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  !

l REGION IV  !

'

i

l Inspection Report: 50-458/93-24

l

Operating License: NPF-47 .

,

Licensee:- Gulf States Utilities '

-

.

P.O. Box 220

St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775 -

j Facility Name: River Bend Station l

'

t

Inspection At: ~St. Francisville, Louisiana  !

Inspection ~ Conducted: July 26-30, 1993

Inspectors: A. B. Earnest, Physical Security Specialist

Facilities . Inspection Programs Section ,

T. W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist,

Facilities Inspection Programs Section

~ J. Kniceley, Physical. Security Specialist, Region III

. Accompanying Personnel: M. Warren, Office of Nuclear Reactor .

. Regulation  !

L i

Two Senior Noncommissioned Officers,

U.S. Army Special Forces

l

. J

l .

-

l- I

Approved: 8l44 1/AVI.Cl/

Blaine Murray, Chief, Facilities Inspection Date

'

b'

Programs Section ,

Inspection Summary

Areas Inspected: Unannounced, special team inspection of the licensee's

physical security program. The areas inspected included records and reports,

lock and key control, assessment aids, communications, security organization,

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS

, SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

l UPON SEPARATION THIS

l PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

l~ 9309070176 930831

l PDR ADOCK 05000458

(- 0 PDR

. . _. _ __. ..

l

- .

I

,

!

-2- DOCUMENT CONTAINS- [

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

alarm stations, training.and qualifications, plans and procedures, and access  !

authorization. ,

Results: f

e. Concerns were identified regarding the response and followup to  !

significant audit findings (Section 1.1).

l

  • An apparent violation was identified involving an event that was not  !

reported in a timely manner (Section 1.2). .

!

  • An excellent testing and maintenance program had been implemented for the j

security systems (Section 1.3). i

e A very good lock.and key control system was maintained (Section 1.4).

  • The protected area barriers were effective in delaying personnel access

to the protected area (Section 1.5).

  • . The compensatory measures program was efficiently implemented l

(Section 1.6).

  • '.The assessment aids system provided effective assessment of the perimeter

detection zones ~ (Section 1.7). '

!

  • The personnel access. control equipment was very effective (Section 1.8). i

!

  • A violation was identified involving the failure of four zones of the i

protected area detection system (Section 1.9). t

!

  • The alarm stations were redundant and well protected, and the operators

were alert and trained (Section 1.10).  ;

  • A good communications program was in place (Section 1.11). I
  • Required training had been conducted and, with one exception, training

records were properly documented (Section 2.1).

  • An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to protect

Safeguards Information. Corrective actions for two similar violations

identified within the last year were apparently ineffective in preventing

~

recurrence (Section 3.1).

  • -

Several weaknesses were identified with the security implementing

procedures (Section 4.1).

DOCLNENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

UPON SEPARATION THIS

PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

i

I - .. . . _ - - . . . --

.

.

.

-3- DOCUMENT CONTAINS

SAFEGUARDS INF0P.MATION

  • A concern was identified regarding a contractor employee that was granted

unescorted access without enough investigative information in the file to

justify the decision. The licensee made a commitment to file detailed

access authorization information in the future (Section 5.1).

Summary of Inspection Findinos:

  • Apparent Violation 458/9324-01 was opened (Section 1.2).
  • Violation 458/9324-02 was opened (Section 1.9).
  • Inspection Followup Item 458/9324-04 was opened (Section 2.1).
  • Apparent Violation 458/9324-03 was opened (Section 3.1).
  • Inspection Followup Item 458/9324-05 was opened (Section 4.1).

Attachment:

o Atta:hment - Persons Contacted and Exit Meeting.

-

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

UPON SEPARATION THIS

PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

_