ML20038C385

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Evaluation of Emergency Response Facilities for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.
ML20038C385
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/1981
From:
Battelle Memorial Institute, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATION
To:
Shared Package
ML20038C379 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0696, RTR-NUREG-0814, RTR-NUREG-696, RTR-NUREG-814 NUDOCS 8112100547
Download: ML20038C385 (74)


Text

. _ -

l 1

l

~

l l

t ,

^

.l EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE FACILITIES FOR LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 L

4-October 1981 Prepared for the U.S. ' NRC under a. related -

services agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830

. Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 t

e M4 I

PDR

TABLE OF O'IEN"IS

1. SU:@9RY AND RECCleEETICNS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 -
2. TEGNICAL SUPPCR:' CETIER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.1 Integration with Overall Planning........................ 2-1 2.2 Location................................................. 2-2 2 . 3 S iz e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 2.4 Structure.......................................... .... 2-6 2.5 Eabitability..................................... ...... 2-7 2.6 Staffing................................................ 2-10 2.7 Cer=1:nications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-12 2.8 Instrt=entation, Data Systen Muipaent and Powe- Supplies.......................................... 2-14 2.9 Technical Data and Data Systen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-14 2.10 Record Availability and Managenent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 -
3. O"IRCL ROCM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 -1 3.1 Integratica with Overall Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.2 S taf f ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 -2 3.3 C-. mica tions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 -3 3.4 ERF Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 -3
4. OPERATICNAL SUPPCRI' GNTER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.1 Integration with Overall Systen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.2 Eabi tability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 -2 4.3 Cu...mications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 -3 4.4 S taf f ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 4.5 Size..................................................... 4-4
5. EMERGENCY CPERATICNS FACIL1"I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.1 Integraticn with Cverall Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.2 Locatien , Structure and Habitability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2 5.3 S taf fing . . . . . . . . . . . r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5 1 5.4 Size.....................................................5-7 5.5 Radiological Mcnitoring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10 5.6 Ca=nunicaticns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
  • 5.7 Insert =entaticn, Data Systen Equignent and Power Supplies.......................................... 5-16 5,. 8 Technical Data and Data Systen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-16 5.9 Records Availability and Managenent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-16 I

I I

i I

e.

6. DATA ACCUISITICN SYSTDi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 6.1 DAS Functicnal Description...................'............ 6-1 6.2 DAS Facilities........................................... 6-1 6.3 DAS Equifrmnt Specificatiens. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3 6.4 Sensor Data to be Acnuired. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7 6.5 Data to be Provided fcr Dese Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8
7. DATA DISFIAY SYSTD!S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7.1 Functional Display Devices............................... 7-1 7.2 SPDS.....................................................7-8 7.3 Other Display Devices.................................... 7-8
8. DATA MHICATICNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 8.1 Description............~.................................. 8-1 8.2 General.................................................. 8-1 8.3 Adced Questiens for Data Links Using EIA Standard Interfaces............................................... 8-2 8.4 Added Questions for Voice-Frequency Links................ 8-2 8.5 Igplicable S tandards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2
9. SYSII:M SUFPORT FICUIRDCTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 9.1 Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 -

9.2 Training................................................. 9-3 9.3 Quality Assurance........................................ 9-3 9.4 Reliability.............................................. 9-6 . _

9.5 Maint enanc e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-7 M +

e N a 4

,---r. . + - - , - - -- ,- , - ..--. -y e-- - . - - --- , - . < - - .- y -. -- , , 3

LaSallo *

,r -

1. SUMMIRY AND RECOMMEITATICNS

'Ihe follcwing areas of the Commonwealth Edison ERF design package must provide more information in order to make an evaluation of the proposed EEFs.

More information is needed concerning the location of the 1SC. It was not clear exactly where the TSC is located with respect to the.centrol room and other plant systems.

A detailed locational diagram must be provided which identifies the size of the TSC and the workstations, functional areas and equipment in the TSC.

More infor=ation is needed concerning the 'ISC's ability to witheand reasonably expected adverse weather conditions. - -

More information is needed concerning the habitability of the TSC and the radiological monitoring.

Supplies of protective clothing, respiratory equipment etc. stored in the 'ISC must be addressed.

More information concerning the staffing of the 'ISC and EDF must be -

provided.

Cccmunications in .the 'ISC, CSC and ECF must be provided.

We centrol rcce must be addressed.

More informaticn concerning the CSC must be proviced.

Se location of the IDF must be addressed, including the transportation netwcrk in the vicinity of the EDF.

Fadiological protection supplies which must te stored at the ECF should be identified. ~

The size of the EDF must be addressed and a layout of the IDF identifying workstations and equipment must be provided. ,

Fadiological monitoring of the EDF must be addressed.

A counting recm and the instrtrrentation available at the EDF must be addressed. _

~

Records availability and :ranagement at' the EDF must be addressed.

Cocmonwealth Edison has submitted a single conceptual design package covering prcpesed emergency response facilities at four of its plants:

Dresden (Units 2 and 3), Cuad Cities (Units 1 and 2), Zicn (Units 1 and 2)

! Page 1-1 -

e -


se ,-.v. p - ,,w -4,..---,.---e- . , , , _ , - , -.

+ - -- -

TaSalle --

and LaSalle . (Unit 1). 2e data acquisition and display systers;at the Dresden and Quad Cities plants are identical and are therefore-' covered. by this single evaluation report. ~ 2e conceptual design package points out -

differences in the systems at Zicn and LaSalle, and the -IRF's at these plants were therefore evaluated separately. .

~

. 'Ibe licensee indicates that the basic process computer syst e which provides plant data to the control rom of its LaSalle plant consists of two Ecneywell 4010 central processors, two bulk core storage units, and process I/O ecuipaent. 2e processors and bulk core storage units are arranged in a redundant ecnfiguratien, which irdicates that processing and working stcrage reliability were strongly censidered in the ' design. Se configuration also includes two Prime 750 computer systems which will be used to provide historic data stcrage -and retrieval ftmetions and to

support data link access to off-site users. ' Access to real-time data from the control rom and ERF's will be from the Honeywell computers, not from ~

.the Prime's.

2e SES display, available' in the centrol rom and the ERF's, consists of a high-level display showing overall plant safety _ status.

Second-level (trend) displays ray be selected by operatcrs at any time.

Data displayed by the SES is validated by cmparing redundant sensors and performing reascnableness checks, apparently in software. Persons with -

plant operating experience, including control rom operators, have been directly involved in the design of the display formats. .

Radiological and meteorological assessment functions are supp rted by computers at two levels. W e A-Model resides in the plant process computer system (Ecaeywell 4500's). Metecrological and radiological monitoring signals are hardwired into the ce=puter systen, which wi11' produce initial transper: and diffusion estirates within. 15 minutes follcwing the classification of an incident. Se S-nedel resides in the corporate cc=puter in Chicago and produces refired estirates of dose given ranual entr'( of effluent and meteorology data. 2e corporate co=puter also centains a series of short programs, collectively called a "C-Model," used to provide dose estirates in the affected near-site area.

Commonwealth Edison has - provided a conceptual design for ERF data

- systems which implies their intent to conform to the. functieral-requirements of mREG-0696. However, in order for a cceplete evaluation to be performed, specific, detailed information is needed relating to the following areas

Degree of i= pact that plant process and EPS functions have on each other; Specific plant paraneters to be monitored, including resolutiens and sampling rates;. ~-

Details of the rencte multiplexcr system for plant para:eters, including a- descriptien of how the licensee intends to reet the Page 1-2 9

r.msn119 ,

7 '

4 isolation requirment for safety-related signals; Exa: ples and/or detailed descriptions of display formats; -

Display hardware descriptiens;' .

Data conmmications systems and facilities, including provisions to support the Nuclear Data Link; System support facilities and procedures, including documentation, training, quality assurance, reliability and maintenance.

i .

p d

O I

t i

h t

d l

l l

! Page 1-3 m.

L 4

LaSallo

~

CaeEr.T

2. TEGNICAL hiuc CE:;TER 2.1 Integration with Overall Planning
1. Se design of the Technical Support Center Adequate response.

(TSC) addresses the follcwing goals:

a. Provides plant ranagenent and technical support to plant operations personnel during emergency conditions;
b. Relieves the reactor operators of peripheral duties and cocmunications not - directly related to reactor

- system ranipulations;

c. Prevents congestien in the control roan; and -
d. Performs EDF functicns for the Alert E:aergency class and for the Site Area. -

E:nergency class and Geraral Ercergency class until the EOF is functieral.

2. Se E C shall be the emercency operatiens Insuffigient infor=ation.

work area for desigrated technical, Previsions for IRC engineering, and senior licensee plant personnel are not rentiered.

ranage=ent persenrel; any cther license H esignated personnel required to provide the reeded technical supprt; and a srall staff of !EC persenrel.

3. Se E C shall have facilities to supprt Insufficient inforration.

the plant rancgenent- and technical No mention is rade regard-personnel who will be assigned there ing the performance of EF during an mergency and will be the functions prict to activa-prirary onsite ccmmunications center for tion of EDF.

the plant during the energency. TSC personnel shall use the EC data system to analyze the plant steady-state and dyramic behavier prior to and throughout the course of an accident. De results of this analysis will be used to provide guidance to tne control .rocm cperating persorEel in the manager.ent of abnorral conditions and in accident mitigaticn. TSC personnel will also use the environmental and Page 2-1

ra c: allo

  • M51' T
  • radiological information available from the 'ISC data system to perform the necessary functions of the TF when this facility is not cperable.
4. Since the specific allocation of functions Adequate response.'

assigned to emergency facilities will differ frcxn design to design, the proposal' '

should clearly state which functicns (Operations, %diological Assessment, etc.) are assi.,. . to the 'ISC.

2.2 Iocation

1. 'Ite EC should: - -
a. Be 11 the sa=e building as the Insufficient information.

control rocm if ;cssible; if not, then where is it' located?

b. Se within 2 minutes walking distance 'Ihe 'ISC is stated as being from the control room. within a 2 minute walk from the Control Room. -

Is the 'ISC within the security Yes perimeter?

Must someone pass through secu-ity Subject not addressed, checkpoints to move from the 'ISC to the centrol roc =?

What provirions have been made for Subject not addressed' .

passing through security checkpoints quickly and easily?

Whac stai:vays, corridors or Subject not addressed.

equipwnt spaces :dt:st be traversed?

Is the route between the ':SC and Subject not addressed.

control rocm exposed to air-scattered ,

or direct radiation from the containment?

~

What is the maximum exposure a person Subject not addressed.

will receive while walking from the ,

control roca to the 'ISC during a design basis accident (less than or equal to 5 rem, including all other exposures, during the course of an accident)?

Page 2-2 SS

LaSailo

, .. C:EME2rf 1

Does the route between the control- Subject.not addressed.

roan and the EC have a radiological

~

monitor or - are there provisions for

- deter:nining exposure rates periodically?

c. Facilitate face to face interaction Subject not addressed.

with control roce personnel.

Are there additional means (e.g.,

closed circuit 7N) cetween the EC and the control roan to facilitate visual as well as auditory cor::munication?

What are the factors that impede face-to-face interaction?

6. Afford access to any control room Subject not addressed.

information not available in E C data systs. ,

Eow can data not available in the EC data system be provided to the EC?

2.3 Size

1. W e S C shall provide:
a. Working space, without crewding, for Insufficient info:.ation.

the personnel assigned to the E C at he design package states the maximum level of occupancy that 25 persons can be (minirun size of working space acco:nnodated.

provided shall be apprcxirately 75 sq ft/persen). _

< Eow much space ic assigned to each Subject not addressed, werk station?

Is an operational sequence diagran Subject not addressed.

! provided that describes the l interaction among operators, werk stations and items of equipnent?

=.

I Page 2-3

=

i

LaSallo *

. CCWcn T -

Is a locat'icnal diagram provided that A diagram is not provided.

shows where grsonnel work statiens -

and iters of equipnent will be placed? Is the scale of the diagran provided?

Is each work station equipped for its Stject not addressed.

functien? .

Are personnel grouped by function? S2 ject not addressed.

Does each work station have sufficient space to carry :out. its assigned functien? -

Explain hcw the location of. Subject not addressed.

facilities and equignent- -is  : _ ..:

~

consistent with the patteine of - -

interpersoral interaction and rachine utilizations that will take place.f:.

hto needs access to which rachines? S tject not addressed.

..._:: . . .1. . _ _ . . ..

htat is 'the ficw of infor=ation Stject not addressed.

between persons and groups?

Are personnel perfcrming related Subject not addressed.

tasks located adjacent to. :one - -

another?. - .

rescribe the organizatien of the werk Subject not addressed.

stations. Are they crganized acccrding to Figure 2.1?

Describe hcw the workspaces are subject not addressed.

designed to centrol traffic and noise (mechanical and conversaticral) .

b. Space for ':SC data system equip ent Insufficient inferration.

needed .to tran =it data to other locaticns.

Where is the data displayed?

, Show how layouts cf displays are No floor plan provided for coordirated with werking space LaSalle.

layouts. .

~.

t l

Page 2-4 Oh

I

-- IaSailo COMMENT

' How much space is available for Subject not addressed.

working with maps, diagrams, ,

drawings, ete?

Where are the maps, diagrams, Subject not addressed.

drm ings, etc. located?

Is there a description of the Subject not addressed.

characteristics of the machines in the 'ISC that provides a basis for detemining their compatibility with anthrepometric guidelines (e.g. . Van Cott & Kinkade, Human Engineering Guide to Equignent Design)?

Are the characteristics of the data subject not addressed.

display devices ccx::patible with ~

anthrepemetric guidelines?

c. Sufficient space to repair, maintain, Subject not addressed.

and service equip:st, displays, and M Jume.ntation. -

How much space is provided to al'.cw access to backpanels for repair? ,

What spare modules are available?

d. Space for unhindered access to Subject not addressed.

corrutications equipaent hy all TSC personrel who need cer=nlications capabilities to perform their funcciens.

Is there a description of the layout Subject not addressed.

of the telephones in the 'ISC?

Ecw much space. is provided for each telephere? (one sq. ft.

minimum)

How can a ringing telephone be easily identified (i.e., do telephones light up when ringing)?

Page 2-5 e- -- - ,n - --,n,- ~ -

, - . , - , , . - ,-- -m-v --

,~

LaSalla ,

031ME:NT

e. Space for storage of and/or access to subject not addressed, plant records and historical data. ,.

How :nuch ' work space is dedicated to this task?

f. A separate roan, adequate- for at Subject not addressed, least three persons, to be used for ,

private NRC censultations.

Are three of the five NRC work. Subject not addressed.-

stations afforded sufficient privacy for meetings and telephone -

conversations?-

Does this roan have a speaker Subject not addressed.

telephone? ,

What size is this roan? (200 sq. ft.

minin n)

2. Uhe TSC working space shall be sized for a Insufficient information.

minimum of 25 persons, including 20 persons designated by the licensee and five NRC personnel. -

How many pecple are assigned to the S C by 8 directors e.nd their' staff the emergency plan, including five NRC are assigned to the 75C.

persennel?

Is the work space adequate for these Insufficient info =2tien.

pecple to perform their functions?

2.4 Structure

1. The ISC complex must be able to withstand Insufficient information.

reasonably expected adverse conditions. The design package states that the TSC has " adequate Can tne TSC be operable during a 100-year capability to withstand flood? ' effects of earthquakes,,

floods and tornadoes.

Can the 75C withstand" a 100-year vindstorm?

Is the USC accessible during floods and ,

storms? _,

Page 2-6 9

Se

T .

LaSalle l

CMMENT 2.5 Ecbitability

1. The EC shall have the same radiological 'Ihe EC is stated as having habitability as the control room. the same habitability as the control recrn. No further -

infonration is available for evaluation.

Which accidents were analy::ed to determine Subject not addressed.

what radiatien doses would be received in the EC during the mest severe accidents?

What are the whole body radiation doses S Wject not addressed.

during plu:ne passage (less than or equal to 5 ren)?

2. The EC ventilation systen shall be Subject not addressed.

functicnally comparable to the control rocxn systen (i.e., high efficiency particulate air and charcoal filter) .

Autcreatic isolation is not required. -

Brierly describe the EVAC systen SWject not addressed.

filtration systen. -

Is the decontamination capability (D.F.) Subject not addressed.

of the EC systen different from the control rocan systen? Briefly describe the ,

difference.

Is the EVAC system controlled to isolate Subject not addressed.

':ht intake?

At wnat airborne activity level does Subject not addressed.

isolatien occur?

Ecw is the level deten:rined? Subject not addressed.

Where are the sensors located? Subject not addressed.

Page 2-7

IaSallo

". CENMENT

~

3. Radiation monitoring systems shall be Insufficient infor=ation.

either grmanently installed or shall be Both a continuous air dedicated portable-type instrenents (e.g. , monitor and a portable area dose rate and ~ airborne radiation monitor are used. To further detectors). Detectors shall be able to details are given.

detect radiciodine as low as 1E-7 microcuries/cc. The licensee shall provide -

the "3C with installed radiation monitors or dedicated portable monitoring '

equignent.

Are dedicated dose-rate instrt:nents, Subject not addressed.

survey meters, and airborne radioactivity monitoring instrtrnents assigned to the SC?

Which instrtraents will be used? Subject not addressed. -

How many of each? Subject not addressed.

Where are they located? Subject not addressed.

How was the type, ntrber and placement of Subject not addressed, monitoring instrtrents determired?

What are the ranges of these instrtraents? Subject not addressed.

Do the instrtrent ranges cover the values Subject not addressed.

expected if the EC's EVIC decontamination capability fails during a IEA?

Who is assigned to monitor the "3 C Subject not addressed.

habitability? -

What are the qualifications of this Subject not addressed.

person?

If there is no one assigned, are there Subject not addressed.

i fixed instrtrents equipped with audible and visual alaans?

l l

l ,

I l

l l

Page 2-8 l

l l

l l

LaSa119 COBENT

.. ~

At what radiation levels will these Subject not addressed.

instruments alam?

Does the system provide a warning of the S6 ject not addressed.

precsutionary radiation levels in a timely manner to allow the 'ISC personnel to take protective actions?

Are unattended instrtrents in continuous Subject not addressed.

cperation?

How is iodine monitored?_ S6 ject not addressed.

Is the detectibility for airborne I-131 as Subject not addressed.

low as 19-7 =icrocuries/ce?

What is the reliability of the Subject not addressed.

continuously-cperating instrtraents, i.e. ,

is there back-up power for the ,

instruments? Do the instruments meet the manufacturers specifications for availability and accuracy? Ecw often are the instrt=ents calibrated?

4. Supplies of protective clothing, S6 ject not addressed. ,

respiratory eqaipt and potassit= iodide shall be readily. available to all 'ISC personnel.

If this is not- the case, how  ::nny Subject not addressed.

individuals can be supplied?

Are reserves of this egaip ent available S6 ject not addressed.

in the 'ISC or scme other rearby location?

Where? Subject not addressed.

Are instructicns for use.cf KI available? S 6 ject not addressed.

Ecw is the reed fer such supplies Subject not addressed.

determired, i.e. , when will personnel don

. respiratory equi m t?

Is the protecticn factor for respritory Subject not addressed.

equipaent equivalent to a full face trask?

Page 2-9

-- , -- , rn . . - , . -

, ,e- - . -.- , - - - - , -~ - - - , , -

LaSalla

. CCNMENT 2.6 Staffing (hUREG-0696 and Ph1 BC/ EOF Staffing Study)

1. We 'ISC shall: Insufficient information.
a. Be fully functional within 30 minutes -

of activatien.

How long does it take 'ISC equipaent to become fully fimetional?

b. Consist of sufficient technical Insufficient infor: ration, personnel needed to support the control reem including individuals who can handle situations involving operations, maintenance, . .

administration, security, Rad / chem, and cermunications (Figure 2.1 is an example only) .

Has the licensee identified the tasks that may need to be performed and specified the characteristics (e.g.

skills, experience and training) of .

the persons needed to accc=plish these tasks?

2. Allocation of tasks to personnel should be Subject not ackiressed.

validated by an analysis of error likely situations, especially these situations that might exceed the htran cperator's capability in the. areas of perception, -

re.ory, information integration and .

manipulatien of centrols.

What is the total ntrier of personnel te total ntrrber is not assigned to the EC? - - -

given. 8 directors and there staff will be in the EC.

Are there adequate ntrrbers of personnel . Insufficient information.

  • assigned to the EC to carry out its function?

s 4 .

Page 2-10 C

TSC0RGANi2ATZON TSC MANAGER NRC ADMINISTRATIVE RADICHEM ENGINEERING LI ASON SUPERVISOR - SUPERVISOR - SUPERVISOR 1 1 1 1

_ COMMUNICATORS _

' CHEMIST MECHANICAL 2-3 1 ENGINEER 1

SAFEGUARDS HEALTH COORD t NATOR - PHYSIClST 1NSTRUMENT AND 1 24 -

CONTROL ENGINEER 1

DOSIMETRY, POSTING' HEALTH .

AND RECORDING CLERK PHYSICS. " g , ,'g 1 TECHNICIAN  ;

1 HYDR AULIC -

DOSE ASSESSMENT - ENGINEER COMMUNICATOR 1

'~ AND RECORDER

~

SYSTEMS ENGINEER AND LI AISON TO VENDOR

. 1 PROCEDURE CLERK AND RECORDER 1

FIGURE 2.1 Page 2-11 4

e

LaSal19 .

CD9ENT r

2.7 Ca=unications

1. If existing licensee cc:=unt.:ations Insufficient inferration.

systems are to be used to meet EC emergency requirements the licensee must-demonstrate the system's ability to handle '

.added EC requirenents under energency ,

Ccndit1Cns.

2. EC telephene access to ccanercial Subject not addressed.

h ..cn-carrier services must bypass any ensite er local offsite switching facilities that ray be susceptable to less of p3wer during emergencies.

3. How rany switchboard independent Subject not addressed. -

ca=mercial telephone lines to the plant are available for use by the E C during emergencies?

^

4. EC voice cor=unications must consist of a Insufficient infor: nation.

reliable prirary and backup systen and Details of EC cccmanication include: are not provided.

a. Hotline telephone in the NRC consultation roan en the MS to the NRC Cperations Center.

What is the backup systen for cu.. c.icatiens to the NRC?

b. Dedicated telephone in NRC office space en the NRC Health Phys'ics Network.

What is the backup systen fer cc sunications to the NRC?

c. Dedicated telephcnes to the centrol roan, CSC, and ECF. ,

Do these telephones provide '

, non-interruptable service between the EC, SDF or control roan?

d. Dial telephones that provide a_gcess to onsite and offsite locations.

Page 2-12

~

IaSallo N

- e.' Intercommtnicatiens' systems between any separate work areas within the TSC.

Is there an intercom to connect the S C manager and supervisors?

f. Ccmmmications to licensee mobile monitering teams,
c. Cm m micatiens to State and local cperations centers, i
h. Radio cmmtnications with onsite and offsite organizations and ,

response groups.

5. At least two additional dial telephone subject not addressed.

lines must be provided for use by NRC personnel.

6. Facsimile tranmission capability between Subject not addressed, the EC, ECF and NRC Cperations Center g must also be provided.
7. Provision must be made for 24-hour per day Subject not addressed.

notification. to and activation of tne Stace/ local emergency response network, with 24-hour per day manning of .

cc::nunicatien links that initiate emergency resp:nse acticns (NGRIC-0654) .

8. A coordinated ce==tnicatien link for fixed Stject not addressed.

and mobile medical Support facilities shall be provided (!rREG-0654).

9. Are there descripciens of hcw the subject not addressed.

follcwing ccm=unicatiens needs are met?

E C Manager with Corporate F:Q Control Room EDF i OSC NRC State / local coverrments

~

~'

l Vendors e

Page 2-13

LaSallo *

. Ct9FNT -

5dministrative Supervisor with Corporate HQ -

Backup conmmications Security force EOF Rad / Chem Sucervisor with Radio to EP technicians HP control point CSC Q1emical laboratory -

EDF State / local governments .

EPN Engineering Supervisor with -

Corporate HQ Centrol Rocm MC SOF Vendors NRC Radio to corrective action teans 2.8 Instrtrantation, Data Systen Spipmnt, and Pe.er St= plies These methodologies are addressed in Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9.

i 2.9 Technical Data and Data Systen 5:ese methodologies are addressed in sections 6, 7, 8 and 9.

~

i i

~.

4 Page 2-14 se

- ,-.-_,_.-, --- a

ra milo QJt9ENT 2.10 Records Availability and Managment ,

1. De E C personnel shall have ready access Adequate response.

to up-to-date records, operatioral specifications, and procedures that include but are not limited to:

a. Plant meteorological data,
b. SID systems,
c. Plant technical specifications,
d. Plant cperating procedures,
e. Daargency operating procedures,
f. Final Safety Aralysis Rep rt,
g. Plant cperating records,
h. Plant operations reactor safety committee records and reports,
i. Records reeded to perform the' functions of the EDF when it is not operational, and

~

j. Up-t M te, as-built drawings, scheatics, and diagras showing conditiens of plant structures _and systens down to the ccmponent level, as well as in-plant locations of these systems.
k. Checklists, guides, worksheets and other job performance aids.
2. te licensee shall have all of the above Insufficient infonration.

records in the EC in current form when the facility is fully activated.

What procedures have been established to u% ate these records as necessary to ensure that they are current ard complete?

Describe the . method of storage and presentation of the TSC records ~ which ensures their arallability and ease of access under energency conditions.

Page 2-15

IaSalls

. COM r

3.0 C2nRCL RCCM -

Subject not addressed.

3.1 Integration with Overall Planning

1. te design of the centrol room (CR) addresses the follcuing goals during .

nom.1 cperation:

a. We centrol rocm is the onsite location frcm which the nuclear power plant is operated. It contains the instru:rentation, centrols, and displays for:

nuclear systers, -

reactor coolant systers, steam systens, electrical systems, safety systens, and accident monitoring systens.

b. te control room is staffed during .

nor:r.al cperatiens by a minimum of:

a shift supervisor who is a senicr licensed reacter operator and whose duty statien may be in the irrediate vicinity outside of the control roan itself; a shift forefan who is a senior licensed reacecr operator and whose duty station is in the control recc; control recm cperators, two licensed reactor cperators, whose duty stations are in the control reaa; i

auxiliary operators, two reactor cperators, whose duty assignments are set by the shift supervisor. .

Page 3-1

.o

-, . -..v._ . _ - - - . . _ - . _ _ .

IaSallo CNMENT

2. S e" design of the control rom addresses the follcwing goals during mergency -

condition operations:

a. At the start of an emergency situatien, the control rocm staff performs the following ftr.ctions:

monitor plant parameters, analyze abncrmal conditions, take corrective acticns, classify emergency, make initial notification to shift supervisor, shift fereman, and shift technical advisor, establish initial trends in plant par meters, establish necessary control rom .

staff changes, establish cec =unications with plant emergency response teams, -

establish w.. a ications with Emergency Fesponse Facilities, and manage plant operaticns.

3.2 Staffing

l. B e personnel crganization in the control rocn is shcwn in Figure 3-1.
2. Se succession of authority if the senier persen is incapacitared er unavailable must be addressed. -

l

, 3. te functicnal crganization in the centrol l roca during an abncr.al event is shown in l

Figure 3-2.

l w .

l l

Page 3-2 i

IaSallo

, CDMMDiT r .

3.3 Ccx:=enications

1. Ite folicwing onsite and offsite m ication links for continuous infermation exchange must be available.

cerraercial telephone dedicated telephere -

radio plant intercem Are these cc::ct:nicatien systems described?

2. W.e shift supervisor, shift foraran, and technical advisor or their desigrates must be i:=nediately notified of an abnorral . .

condition. Indicate expected average and

-mi-m notification tires.
3. After the TSC is operaticral, the centrol rocm staff =ust verify that EC w m icatien links with energency tes are established and ft:nctional.
4. Verificatien must be rade that inferratien going to DS's is correct.

3.4 US Phase After the E C is cperaticral, does -the Centrol Roca staff relinquish the folicwing ftricticns:

=araging plant cperaticns, and

~

peripheral duties and cc:nInications not directly related to- reacter system ranipulations.

h sa .

Page 3-3 Se

7 .

. CONTROL ROOM ORGANIZATION 4

SHIFT SUPERVISOR (SENIOR LICENSED REACTOR OPERATOR)

I TECHNICAL COMMUNICATOR SHIFT FOREMAN ADVISOR ' 1 (SENIOR LICENSED -

1 REACTOR OPERATOR) 1 TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS CONTROL ROOM (AS REQUIRED) OPERATOR (LICENSED REACTOR -

OPERATOR) 2 AUXILI ARY -

. OPERATOR

, n1 L

AUXILIARY

, OPERATOR 1

'N e FIGURE 3.1 i

Page 3-4

- n--, g m,-- ~-w,'mr-,w -~

p -o----,v s we e e-p-,~y- ype -w--,m-y--~wo-, .,ew--em-e-,--,y-w gre==+ ~,rwm e , =-cm,~ ,r go-~

FUNCTIONALORGAit!ZATbN'-CONTROLROOM COMMUNICATIONS EMERGENCY RES PONSE FACillTIES a

COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS MANAGE TAKE MONITOR TRENDS OFFSITE PERSONS ONSITE PERSONS PLANT +-- CORRECTIVE -+ IN PLANT -

OPERATIONS ACTION PSAME'ERS as a s6 a6 l'

ANALYSIS OF CLASSIFY A3 NORMAL EMERGENCY}: CCNDITIONS a,

ABNORMAL PLANT PARAMETER VALUES OR INDICATOR 3 l -

l .

I FUNCTIONAL UNTil TSC OPERAT10NAL FIGURE 3.2

^

Page 3-5 c

LaSallo *

. COMMENT T *

4. OPER$TICNAL SUPPCRT CE7IER Subject not addressed.

Except for a statement indicating that an GC ~

is provided with tele-4.1. Integration with Overall Planning phone comunication to the control rom.

1. We design c' the Cperational Support following

. Center (CSC) addresses the goals:

a. Provides a location where plant logistic supprt can be cocrdinated during an emergency, and
b. Restricts control rom access to those support persennel specifically - -

requested by the shift supervisor.

2. An ensite operational support center is separate from the control room and the E C and is where licensee operations supprt personnel will assemble in an emergency.  ;

htere is it located? -

Describe the isolation of the OSC from the EC and control room.

Where are the backup CSC sites and are they accessible (e.g. cnsite er nearsite) and habitable?

Will the back-up CSC be habitable if 'the primary OSC is not?

3. Provisien shall be made for an alternate health physics control ~p int. Where is it located?
4. We health physics control point shall be ,

~

immediately accessible to the CSC. (i.e.,

will personnel traveling frem the GC to

.the H.P. control p int receive less than 5 rem when combined with other exposures during the course of an accident?)

Page 4-1 8

. . ~ - . . , , . , . . . - . .,y, .. s_. - -

w ,

LaSalla COMMENT

~

5. Can persennel access storage facilities without receiving greater than 5 ren (when ccr.bined with other exposures) during the course of an accident?

4.2 Eabitability

1. No specific habitability requirements are established for the OSC.

Is the CSC as habitable as the centrol rc<xn? Discuss.

4 Is the shielding comparable to the centrel roan? Discuss.

. Is the ventilatien comparable to the -

centrol roan? Discuss.

2. If the CSC habitability is not ccmparable to that of the control roan, procedures shall be available for evacuation of CSC -

personml in the event of a large radioactive release.

If CSC has to be evacuated, what are the criteria for evacuation?

Eave key pecple been selected to re::ain ensite (cr nearsite) to continue CSC functions?

Are other personnel, evacuated offsite fran the OSC, available to provide additional CSC functions if required?

3. How are radiation levels determined in the CSC?

I M =

e Page 4-2 G

v

~

ESDDYJ CCMPE22 T '

4. Emergency supplies (protective clothing, respirators, survey meters, dosimeters and KI) thall be available in the OSC for all .

perscruel assigned.at the facility.

What alternate supply arrange ents have been made? .

-Where are equipaent and supplies stored? -

How does CSC staff cbtain their equipaent?

(i.e., is it signed cut, just taken, etc.)

4.3 Cammications

1. There shall be a direct and dedicated , ,

primarr cccmnication link with the centrol room ard TSC.

2. Ca:nmications with the 'ISC and control roce shall be available at the backup OSC.
3. A dial phone snall be available in the OSC for other ensite and offsite locations. ,
4. Direct voice intercarmunicatiens and/or reliable direct radio ccrmications may be used for supple:enting telephone liras.

@^

l i

i I -

ma .

Page 4-3 1

I

, LaSalls COMME 2TI 4.4 Staffing

1. Persenml shall be assigned to the OSC for:
a. Damage control
b. Fire Brigade
c. First Aid
d. Radiation Control
e. Decontamination
f. Radiological and Environmental Surveys
g. Maintenance / Repairs
h. Other Operations Personnel
2. hten the OSC is activated; it shall be supervised by licensee management personnel desigrated in the licensee's emergency plan to perform these ftnctions. .

hto will be in charge of the OSC?

3. Team leaders shall be assigned for each ftnctienal group.

4.5 Size

1. Se OSC shall be large enoogh to ,

, accommodate assigned personnel and

, equi; rent to be stored in the CSC (e.g.15 sq. ft. per person for evaluative purposes only).

2. Decentamiratien facilities should be readily available.

htere are they located F M e Page 4-4

LaSalld

. comerr T '

5. DERGENCY OPERATICNS FACILITY 5.1 Integration with Overall Dnergency t Planning
1. te design of the Energency Operations Iradequate response. -

Facility (ECF) addresses the follcwing Does not include recormen-goals: datien of public protective actions.

a. Managenent of overall licensee emergency resp nse;
b. Coordination of radiological and-environmental assessment;. . . .

- c. Determiratien of- re e mded public protective actions; and

d. Coordiration of e::ergency_ respnse activities with Federal, State, and local agencies.

' 2. Se IDF shall be staffed by licensee, Subject noti addressed.

Federal, State, local and other energency personnel designated by the energency plan.

, 3. Facilities snall be provided in the IDF Adequate response.

i for the acquisitien, display, and evaluatien of . all radiological, metecrological and plant systen data i

pertinent to determining offsite-protective measures.

4. The licensee shall - use the EDF to I:tsufficient infor:raticn.
coordirate its emergency resp nse A detailed description of activities with those of the local, State, EDF functions is not
and Federal agencies, including the NRC. -provided.
  • i Licensee personnel in the EDF will assess potential offsite effects and make

,apprcpriate protective action recommendations for the public to State and local mergency response agencies. Ihe i

EDF may be used as a location for -

information dissemination to the pcblic via the news media by designated spokesgersons in accordance with the licensee's e::ergency plan. The licensee Page 5-1 ED h

LaSalla OmMENT also may use the EOF as the post-accident recover; ranagenent center. Since the .

specific allocation of functions assigned to emergency facilities will differ from design to design, the proposal should clearly state which functions (Padiological Assessment, security, Coordination with Offsite Agencies) are assigned to the EOF.

5.2 Location, Structure and Habitability

1. Ite siting of the TF should include the following criteria:
a. Whether the location facilitates Subject not addressed.

carrying out the functions specified for the EOF (i.e., determiration of public protective actions to be reccanended by the licersee to offsite officials, and coordiration of the licensee with Federal, State, and local organi::ations). ,

Describe the transprtation network Subject not addressed.

m the viciaity of the EDF adequate to assure rapid coverage of the EPZ by monitoring teams. -

Is the ECF placed in a locaticn that Subject not addressed.

is readily accessible by road to Federal, State, local government officials as well as the licensee's corporate and site cperaticns personnel?

Has the selection of the IDF location Subject not addressed. .

been coordirated with State /lccal officials?

Page 5-2

IaSallo

, COMMENT T '

. b.' Khat radiation doses would be Insufficient information, expected when the EDF is accessed For Braidwood, Dresden, during DBA or other specified LaSalle and Quad Cities, accident (less than or equal to 5 the IDF is located more ren)? than 10 miles from the plant. Zion will have a Is the EDF accessible during periods protected EOF within 10 of radiatien releases? miles and a backup EDF 12 miles frcxn the station.-

Is there an alternate IDF?

2. The EDF must be able to withstand Subject not addressed.

reasonable eWed adverse conditions.

(e.g., 100 year floods and high winds)

Ecw would the maximum 100-year water Subject not addressed.

levels and winds affect the operation of . .

t'e EDF? .

3. Se EOF shall have a protection factor Adequate response.

greater than or equal to five if located within 10 miles of SSC; no protection level is necessary if located beyond 10 miles of the ISC. Protection factor is defined in terms of the attenuation of 0.7 ,

MeV ga:rra radiation.

f

~

I Page 5-3

(IMMENT

- t

.4. D.e ' EF ventilation systen shall be Subject not addressed.

functionally comparable to the control .

room system and TSC (i.e., high 4ficiency particulate air filter; no e'  :: cal) if located within 10 miles s TSC. If located beyond 10 miles from the 7"C, the E F needs no ventilation protection.

- x To what level will the .  ?.. filters reduce Subject not addressed.

particulate levels?

Is the hVAC system controlled to permit Subject not addressed.

isolation of the intake?

^

At what level of airborne activity is Subject not addressed.

isolation performed? -

How is the level determined? Subject not addressed.

^

Where are the sensors located? Stbject not addressed.

Where is this level monitored? Subject not addressed.

5. Protective clothing, respiratory equipaent Subject not addressed.

and potassitn iodide shall be readily ,

available to all EDF personnel.

If not, how many people would be supplied? Subject not addressed.

Are reserves of supplies available? Subject'notaddressed.

Where are they located? Subject not addressed.

How is the need for these supplies Subject not addressed.

determined? (i.e., when will respiratory equip ent be used?)

Is the protection factor- for respiratory Subject not addressed.

equipr.ent equivalent to a full face mask?

Are instructions for KI use provided in Subject not addressed.

the EF?

Page 5-4 G

m' ' s

m. _ . . . - . . . . .. i im i i mid

rmin

". CD9E7r T '

5.3 Staffing (WRm-0696 and ML EC/ EOF Staffing Study)

1. @.e EF shall: Insufficient information.
a. Be ft:nctional within one hour of activation; What equipaent takes more than 60 minutes to become operational?

How long does it take to fully staff the IDF?

What is the procedure to ensure notification of the mins.mtzu EF -

staff?

b. Include staff to engace in onsite and offsite radiological monitoring and a senior management person to be in charge of all licensee activities in the EF. An exa=ple of additional staffing needs for the EDF are given -

in Figure 5-1 (from the RL EC/ EOF Staffing Study.)

c. Has the licensee identified the tasks that ray need to be performed and specified the characteristics (e.g.

skills, experience and training) of the persons needed to acccmplish -

these tasks? -

2. Allocation of tasks to personnel should be Insufficient infocation.

validated by an analysis of errer likely situations, especially- those situations that might . exceed the htrran cperator's capability in the areas of percection, mencry, inferration integration and ,

manipulation of controls.

,W hat is the total nt=ber of personnel assigned to the EF? Are there adequate l ntzbers of personnel assigrad to the EF -

to carry out its function? ,

l l

t Page'5-5 l

l L

EOF ORGAN 12AT!CN EOF IMNAGER 6

ADMINI STRATIVE DOSE LI AISON

~

SUPERVISOR ASSESSMENT -

SUPERVISOR 1 SUPERVIS OR I 1

SECilRITY

- NRC LI AISON COORDINATOR FIELD TEAM (1 ENGINEER 1

COMMUNI CATOR ENGINEERING 1 DOSE 1 SUPERVISOR ASSESSMENT)

_,., GUARD (ASSISTANT 1 1 FIELD DATA '-

MANAGER)

RECORDER PUBLIC 00SIMETRY I

- ~ AFFAIRS CLERK-OFFICER 1 ISC 1

COMMUNICATOR AND RECORDER ICOMMUN)CATICN5

' STATEILOCAL TECHNICI AN GOVERNMENT 1 1 HEALTH FHYSI CIST EOC LOGISTICS CLERK' 3

ADMINISTRATIVE .' LI AISON ASSI STANT, I RECORDER 1

i POSTING (STATUS)

CLERK I

FIGURE 5.2 Page 5-6

LaSal19 .

CJtfENT T '

5.4 Size

1. The EF building or building complex shall Subject not addressed. ..

be large enough to provide:

a. Working space for the personnel assigned to the EF as specified in ,

the licensee's emergency plan, including State and 1ccal agency personnel, at the maximum level of occupancy without crowding (mini =cm size of total working space provided shall be approxirately 75 sq ft/ person);

How much space is assigned to each * -

work station?

Is an operational sequence diagran provided that~ describes the interacticn among EF staff, work stations and items of equi; ment?

Is a locaticnal diagram provided that -

shows where personml work stations and items of equipment will be placed? Is the scale of the diagran - -

provided?

Is each work statica equip;ed fer its function (i.e., manager, liaison, dose asses.emnt, engineering, adninistration etc.)?

Are personnel grcuped by ft:ncticn?

Does each work ~~ station have sufficient space to carry cut its assigned functien?

F.xplain how the location of facilities and equipaent is

. consistent with the~ patterns of interpersonal interaction and machine utilizaticns that will take place.

Knoneedsaccesstowhichmachi5s?

Page 5-7

-p, -- y. ,.yy 3 -

LaSallo

. N What is the ficw of information between persons and groups? -

Are personnel performing related tasks located adjacent to one

, another?

Describe the organizations of the work staticns. Are they crganized according to Figure 5.2?

Describe hcw the are workspaces designed to centrol traffic and noise (mechanical and conversational).

b. Space for ECF data systen equipnent needed to transmit data to other locations.

Nhere is the data displayed?

Are layouts of displays coordinated with working space layouts?

i How much space is there for workire -

with maps, diagrams, drawings, etc.

Where are the maps, diagrams, drawings, etc., located?

Is there a description of the characteristics of the =achines in the EDF that provides a basis for determining their compatibility with anthrepometric guidelines (e.g. Van Cott & Kinkade, Eu=an Engineering Guide to Equitr.ent Design)?

l Are the characteristics of the data l display devices compatible with i

anthrcpometric guidelines?

I i

c. Sufficient space to perfecn repair, maintenance, and service of
equignent, displays, and j instrumentation; Page 5-8 t

L

LaSal19 *

. CEEMENT T '

much space is provided to allcw

~

Ecw access to back panels for repair? .

What spare =odules are available?

Is a werking statien assigned for repair and maintenance? -

d. Space for t:nhindered access to ce=nunications equi; tent by all EF personnel who need cm unications capabilities to perfc: n their functions.

Is there a description.of the laycut of the telephones in the EOF?

How much space .is provided for each telephone (atout 1 sq. ft.)?

.How can a ringing . telephone be easily identified (i.e., do phones light up when ringirs)?

e. Space for ready access to functioral displays of EF data.  ::.

Is there space to display maps of the EPZ?

f. Space for stcrage of plant records and historical. data. Records, data and drawings may be kept in 'ISC if they can be displayed in the EF by an autcmated method of retrieval.

How much work space is dedicated to this task?

l l g. Separate office space to .accc=:odate ,

at least five NRC personnel during periocs that the EOF is activated.

l How much office space is allocated j for NRC tice (at least 250-375 sq.

ft.) ? '

m .

Does this rocm have a speaker telephone?

l l

Page 5-9

IaSalla CCtM2iT

2. The ~ ECF working space- shall be large Subject not addressed.

enough for at least 35 persons, including 25 persens designated by the licensee, 9 persons from lac, and 1 person from FFA.

This minime:n space shall be increased if the maximu:n staffing levels specified in the licensee's emergency plan, including representatives frcm State and local agencies, exceeds 25 perscra.

Ecw many pecple are assigned to the EDF by the Einergency Plan including the IEC personrel and cra FIFA person?

Is the workspace adequate for these pecple to perfcrm their functicrs?

Are workspaces designed to control noise and traffic and to avoid unintended dissemiration of confidential information?

Are provisions made for liaison persons from offsite crganizations (if desired by these organi::atiens)?

5.5 Radiological Mcnitoring subject not addressed.

1. The licensee shall provide the EDF with ~

installed radiaticn =cnitors er dedicated, prtable =cnitoring equipent.

Are dedicated dose rate instrcrents, survey reters and airborne radioactivity renitoring instruments assigned to the IDF? _.

Which instrtr.ents will be used?

Where are instrtraents located?

How many of each?

How were types of, number of, and placement of monitors determired?

What range do these instruments have?

Page 5-10

^ ~

ran11g

. Ct9 E T T '

2. W.ese systets shall continuously indicate Subject not addressed.

radiation dose rates, airborne radioactivity concentratiens and the presence of radiciodine as lw as lE-7 microcuries/cc in the EEF.

Is someone assigned to monitor the IDF -

habitability when radiatien releases are taking place? '

What are the qualificatiens of this person?

If not, are there fixed instruments which <

are equipped with audible and visual alarms?

At what radiation levels will these instrume.t alarm?

Are t:nattended instrcaents in continuous operation?

Ew is iodine monitored?

Is the detection limit for airborne I-131 as lw as lE-7 microcurries/cc?

What is the reliability of the continuously cperating instruaents? (i.e.,

is there back-up pcwer fer the insertrents? Do the insertrents meet the manufacturers specifications .

for availability and accuracy? E w often are the instrtrents calibrated?)

6 9

0 m.

Page 5-11 89

, LaSalls COMMENT

3. 'Ihese monitoring systems shall include Subject not addressed.

local ala ms with trip levels set to provide early warning to EDF personnel of adverse conditions that may affect the habitability of the EEF. -

htat are the trip levels of these instruments?

Does the instrument syst e provide a warning of precautienary radiation levels in a timely manner to allow the ECF personnel to take protective actions? "

4. Does the EEF have a counting rom? Subject not addressed.

What instruments are available in the counting room?

Where are backup counting roms located?

Is the counting rom or receiving room -

readily accessible to offsite ECF personnel and monitoring teams?

Is the monitoring equipnent stored at the' ECF? If not, where is it stored?

Supplies of prote'ctive clothing, ,

respiratory equipmnt and KI chall be i readily available for all personnel .tio w

may need access ro the plant or may enter the airborn pit =e.

Are instructicns for ,the use of KI available?

Are reserves of equipnent available in the EDF or some nearby location?

htere?

How is the need for such supplies determined? i.e., when will personnel don respiratory equignent?

Is the protection factor for respiratory equignent equivalent to a full face mask?

Page 5-12

- - - ^- - -

3,g g

. CDMENT T '

5.6 Ccemimications Subject not addressed.

i 1. EF telephone access to comercial

! telephone common carrier services must bypass any local telephone switching facilities that may be suscer'ible to loss -

of power in emergencies.

Ecw many switchboard independent ccamercial telephone lines are available in the ECF?

2. TF voice comunications must consist of a

! reliable primary and backup system and

include
a. Hotline telephone located in the NRC
office space (and also in the licensee space if desired by the licensee) on the emergency notification systen (ENS) to the NRC Operations Center; What is the backup system for -

communications to the NRC?

b. Dedicated telephone located in the NRC office :qace (and also in the j licensee space if desired by the licensee) on the NRC Health physics
necwcrk (E21);

i What is the backup systen for communication to the NRC?

c. Dedicated telephones for :ranagement wa.ounicatiens with direct access to

! the TSC and the control roem; Do these telephones provide

non-interruptable service between DOF
  • L and TSC or centrol rocm?

I .

(

d. Dial telephones that provide access to ensite and offsite locations; N 4 Page 5-13

LaSalls CODEh"r e.' Interccmmunications systems betwee work areas of the EDF, if needed for the EDF functional performance and if the EDF is comprised ,of separate functicnal areas; Is there an interecm to con M. the IDF manager and supervisors?

f. Padio ecmunications to licensee mobile monitoring teams; Are there provisions to use commercial telephones as a backup?
g. Comunications to State and local operations centers; What are the prircary and backup commmicatiens?

Are they diverse, redundant and -

dedicated?

h. Comunications to facilities outside -

the IDF used to provide supplemental supp rt for ECF evaluations.

Are there 'priihary and backup ,

ccmunicatiens to corprate HQ?

3. We EEF cccmunicaticn syrten shall also include desigrated telephoms (in addition to the ENS and EPN telephems) for use by

, NRC personnel. te licensee shall provide at least two dial telepham lims for such NRC use when the EDF is activated. The licenso shall also furnish the ensite access facilities and cables to the NRC for the EMS and EPN telephems.

'4. Facsimile transmission capability between the EDF, the 'ISC, and the EC Cperations Center snall be provided.

Is facsimile transmission capability installed and tested for comptibility "'

with NRC and offsite authorities?

~

Page 5-14 l

r.n.uii s m

7 '

5. Are- there descriptiens of how the following corsunications needs are met?

ECF manager with Corporata HQ TSC .

Control Roan .

NRC -

State Goverment Local Government ECF Supervisors Administrative supervisor with Corporate HQ TSC Security communication center . .

Outside telephone lines EDF manager Telefax -

Photocopying Dose assessment supervisor with HPN telephone TSC ECF manager Outside lire Radio to monitoring teams Engineering supervisor with Control Rocm '

'ISC .

Corporate Outside lines Vendors Liaison supervisor with Corporate HQ NRC State Government Local Government .

TV Monitor (news stations)

Page 5-15 m.

IaSalls C & INT 5.7 Inst'rumentation, Data System Equipent, and Power Supplies These methodologies are addressed in Sections 6, 7, 8, and 9.

5.8 Technical Data and Data Systeu

?.ese :rethodologies are addressed in Sections 6, 7, 8, and 9.

5.9 Records Availability and Management Subject not addressed.

1. ECF personnel shall have ready access to up-t M te records, operatioral specifications, and procedures that include but are not limited to:
a. Plant meteorological data.

Does the TF have access to prirary. -

and backup meteorological data?

Are dose assess: rent procedures -

designed to use either data set?

b. Up-tMte records related to lice.see, State, and local emergency resp nse plans.

Does the E? have .up-to-date copies of State, local and Federal energercf res;cnse plans and precedures?

c. Safety Parameter Display Systen.
d. Offsite p pulatien distribution data.

l e. Plant technical specifications.

Are specifications, records, drawings, and reports the current

ones (what are the most current "'

l dates)?

l i f. Evacuation plans.

Page 5-16 l

l

IaSalls

. CmMENT r '

g.' Plant operating procedures.

h. Environs radiological monitoring records.

r

i. Emergency cperating procedures.
j. Licensee e::ployee radiation exposure histories. '
k. Final Safety Aralysis Report.
1. Up-tMte, as-built drawings, scheratics, and diagrams showing:

Conditions of plant structures and systems down to the -

component level, and In-plant locations of these systems.

m. Ciecklists, guides, worksheets and other job performance aids. ,
2. Rese records shall either be stored and maintained in the EOF (such as hard copy or microfiche) or shall be readily available via transmittal to the TF from another records storage location. Se method of stortge and presentation of the TF records shall ensure ease of access under e::ergency conditiens. The records available to the T F shall be completely updated as necessary to ensure currency and ccmpleteness.

How are records stcred and maintained in the EF?

Are records readily available for ,

transmission to the TF from another stcrage locatien?

Are records stored so as to be readily and easily accessible?

How are records tyk.ted?

Ecw are the records accessed?

Page 5-17 So w

IaSallo 039ENT

6. Data i quisitien Syst e b

i 6.1 DAS Functional Description

':te function of a data acquisiticn syst m Insufficient infor: ration.

(DAS).in the centext of this methodology Figure on page 10 provides document is to provide a basic source of scme of the required infor data for all eergency res;onse mation, but does not show facilities. A functional block diagram, functional ~ interconnections showing the facilities to be used for data to ERF's and other plant acquisition and their ftnctional facili ties.

interconnection to ERF's and other plant facilities should be provided. Figures 2 and 3 of ILW696 are examples of such diagrams.

6.2 DAS Facilities -

It is anticipated that a dedicated data acquisition syst e , consisting of a single. .

facility er a functierally integrated, physically distributed facility will be proposed for mest sites. However, i ER.EG-0696 does not require that utilities ,

provide specific, dedicated DAS facilities, cnly that they perform specific data acquisitica ftnctions.- Scce sites =ay prcpose to perform DAS ftnctions by sharing other facilities such as the plant process centrol ccmputer. In either case, any facilities used for the acquisition of any and all data relating to safety parameters -and ERF's should address the follcwing areas.
1. DAS Layout Describe the layout of the DAS. A drawing No layout discription is or photograph of the syste(s), showing provided.

equignent rocm layout and cperator console (s) may be sufficient. ,

Page 6-1 e

b o

~ e- g -,~.-,yg,. g- + , - , , , - - . , . w--.--,.,y,e y- -e-- ., --m - ,,-- -

m- - -- ~

LaSa119 .

O@tENI

2. DAS EEvircr=ent

~

a. Where is the CAS located? Not spcified.
b. What fire protection facilities are Not spcified.

provided?

c. Is the rocm te perature controlled?

Not spcified. .

htat is the heat output of the equipnent?

htat is the heat removal capacity of the air conditioning system?

d. ht2t humidity controls are provided? Not specified.
e. Concerning electrical pwer: Inadequate response.

page 24, TSC backup is htat pwer sources are available? diesel generators (2) .

htat are the DAS power require::ents?

Is the source uninterruptable?

htat is the backup source?

3. CAS Physical Security and Access
a. Describe the security procedures which Not specified.

determine who trav access CAS equip ent.

b. Identify the authorized personml. Not specified.

Can the user s cp the system via a nor=al display device?

Can the user stcp the systen without entering the CAS resource restricted area or enclosure? 9

~

M -

Page 6-2 9

95

.- rac: allo l CNMENT l s l l

6.3 CAS Equipnent Specifications In order to evaluate the capability of a proposed DAS to acx;uire and distribute data in a manner consistant with the functional criteria in tun-0696, the DAS equipnent configuration must be understood in detail. it.e follcwing questions are to be applied to any subsysten of a dedicated, distributed DAS, as well as to any systen wnich shares DAS fe.ctions with other plant functicns.

1. Dedicated DAS What facilities are provided for the acquisition of data to be provided for ERF's? .
a. Specify the ccmputer hardware configuration: -

What vendor? Honeywell / Pri:ce htat model number? 4010 / 750 What is the processor's Not specified. _ _

computation '

speed? instructions /sec.

hTat is the systen's configuration?

Number of processors: 2/2

' m.s .

Page 6-3 e

r_ah11 g

. CIHMENT -

r

  • For'each processor or Honeywell 4000 / Prime 750 subsystem, indicate the following:

Working storage: bytes. 2 cpu @'128 K words /

2 cpu @ 1.6 M words byte What type? (core, PCS, etc.) 1.6 M word Lot /

dual port bulk control Error derection and/or Not specified. -

correctica capability?

On-line disk storage:

Number of controllers: 2 16-M word w / dual port bulk control Number of drives:

Total capacity: bytes. 32 M words Maximum access Not specified.

time: sec.

Minimum transfer Not specified.

rate: bytes /sec.

Tape storage: Not specified.

Drive type: (7 or 9 track)

Number of drives:

Maximt:a density: bytes / inch.

Speed: inches /sec.

e 8

4 Page 6-4 46

LaSall'2 OmMENT

~

Data Acquisition Har&are: Not specified.

Number of analog channels:

Sa pling rate Mr channel: samples /sec.

Resolution per channel: bits.

Number of digital channels:

Bits per digital channel:

Data ec:=unications har&are: Not specified.

Number of prts:

Type of p rts: (RS-232, -

V35,etc.)

Average data rate per ~

port: bits /sec.

b. What software operating systen is Not specified.

used? .

c. Will this operating systen Not specified.

software be specially modified for use with the DAS? If so, describe the pres sed modifications and.

their justification,

d. Identify any other software Net specified.

ccmpnents of -the DAS and their source.

m.

Page 6-5

  1. .,- _ _ , . . _ _ , , , _ . _ . , . _ _ , , , _ _ _ _ c- -

LaSallts *

. CCtes?

Y *

2. Additional' Requirements fcr Ncn-dedicated DAS .
a. If the plant process control computer, or It is unclear whether or

.any other cc W er facility not fully not the ccanputers being dedicated to acquisition of data for used for ERF's are also ERF's, is to.be erployed, the following performing plant process information must be understood in addition control functions. '

to that specified in 6.3.1.

What facilities, hardware and software, are included in the configuration to insure that emergency response facility data acquisition functions and other functions do not interfere with and i degrade each other? - -

Does the configuration include dual processors with separate functions?

Do programs and data .for the i separate functions reside in physically separate working -

storage and on-line storage facilities?

Does the operating system s soft'. care provide for the imple:entation and isolation of separate fencrienal tasks?

What user-callable system.

. services are provided to facilitate non-cocperating, -

,concurre}.tprocesses?

~.N . .

,.How 'does the operating:

system. . deal with conflicting requests for ,

, y system resources?

. Iihat is .- the systen's deadlock avoidance

! mechanism? .

'& 4 e g Page 6-6 A

I L .

~ _ , _ , _ - . - . - .

LLSallo QJMMENT 6.4 Sensdr Data to be Acquired

1. Plant variables of Type A, B, C, D, and E, Inadequate response.

- as - specified in Regulatory Guide 1.97 Page 29. PG 1.97 is not Revision 2 Table 1(BWR's) or 2(PWR's), are referenced and'the vari required; -identify any J exclusions, ables to be sensed are not deviations, or additions and describe the listed.

justification for each.

2. Meteorological data described in Inadequate response.

Regulatory Guide 1.23 Revision 1 is Table D.3 & page 21.

required; identify any exclusions, Several PG 1.23 para -

deviations, or additiens and describe the meters are mitted in the justification for each. list -in Table D.3.

3. For each automatically monitored sensor:

At what location is the data from the Insufficient information.

sensor physically obtained for the DAS? Page 5. Prccess I/O systm is r mote multydexor system.

Is isolatien provided? If so, describe. Switched between host pro cessors by means of Describe the cabling between the sensor switched fuses.

and the DAS. -

If the sensor signal is not connected directly to a DAS input, describe any l and all intermediate circuits and/or ,

equipnent.

At what rate is the senscr Mct specified.

sampled: samples /sec.

At what resolution is the sensor data Not specified.

read: bits.

i l 4. For any data which is entered by a manual. Insufficient information.

process describe:

Manual data entry is specified for merecrological The method of entering the data. data to B-nodel (see page i

14) but ent"f method, time, l The time required to enter the data. procedures, and verifi i

cation are not described.

Procedures which have been established for entering the data.

Verification processes used to ihsure the data has been entered correctly and in a timely nanner.

Page 6-7 4

e

, , . = y .-wys.-------,--,-.arme-e -- --r-' ~**---Y wi -r*'*--*T-Y ----v'v= W'*r-~" rr- 8' - "*w--"**"---'---*--" - ' * -" - - - - - ' '-~~- ' ' ' * - - ' * ' - * ^ * * " ' ' * * " - '""'"

O rasalig

, CMENT T

  • 6.5 Data to be Provided for Dese Assessment WRDG-0696 requires that, in addition to InsufficWnfon::atien.

radiological and meteorological. data Pages 14,17,18, 29.

specified in 6.4, the output obtaired from A-model resides in plant a Class A transp rt and diffusion process computer B-model (dispersion) model, described in resides in corporate com WRDG-0654, Revision 1, Appndix 2, be puter, C-model resides in displayed in the EDF. If these transp rt corporate computer.

and diffusion estimates are to be sent to the ECF via the CAS, identify:

The source of these data; The manner in which these data enter A-model input is hard the DAS; wired (page 14) IHnodel .

inputs via ::anual entry.

The voAne of data generated by the Not specified.

rodel; and The rate at which these data are Not specified.

input to the DAS.

1 e

9 1

l .

N 4 I

l Page 6-8 et l

t

-, ,., r -, . , . - . - _ - , .-. . _ . - . , , ....- ,

- ~ ~ ~

ra.qa119 - -

039ENT

7. Data' Display Systems -

7.1 Functional Display Devices Data is acquired and processed by.the DAS for presentation in the 'ISC, the EF, and on the SES displays in the control room.

A functional description of the display devices used in each of these facilities

is required to determine their ability to ,

meet the requirenents of WREG-0696.

1. Displays Required There must be a minimum of the following display units present in each ERF location.

, a. Control Room Displays -

The pri. mary SPDS display must be in the control room. -

b. TSC Displays There must be a dedicated mimic SES '

display unit in the 'ISC.

Since trend informaticn must be displayed, there must be at least one i graphical display unit in the 'ISC. If i

trend information is.not displayed on a graphical display unit, an alternate method of display must be provided' and

! justified. ~

! 'Itere must be at least one dedicated l

terminal available to call up and display data specifically related to

'ISC functions (i.e., plant systen l

variables other than those included in the SPds).

l i

'Page 7-1 i

LaSal19

. CMMENT -

T '

'Ihere must be at least cne terminal dedicated for display of in-plant and offsite radiological variables and meteorological information, for exclusive use in performing IDF functions in the 'ISC.

tere must be at least one hardcopy device available for printing -

information displayed on the CRr's.

Were must be at least one hard copy device capable of displaying graphics information. It is not necessary for the graphics printer to have the resolution or color equivalent of the graphics screen. . .

If static pictorial records such as area maps, building drawings, component drawings or systen diagrams are kept en a computer for call up, a second dedicated graphics display device must be provided for this purpose.

c. EOF Displays There must be. a dedicated _ mimic SIOS display unit in the EOF.

There must be a dedicated display device for the =cnitoring function to menitor radiological, metecrological and plant variable data..

1 If the radiological evaluation function in the IDF is perferred with the aid of a computer, there must be a dedicated terminal for this function.

tere must be a dedicated display device for obtaining information needed

  • by offsite officials.

Since trending information must be j displayed, a graphical display unit is

! required. This unit could also be used i to display graphical data related' to offsite dose predictions (i.e. , plume dispersion, maps).

Page 7-2 We

IaSalla '

CDMNT If static pictorial records, such as ,

area maps, building drawings, companent '

drawings er systen diagr=ns are kept en ,

a cceputer for call-up, a second '

dedicated graphics display device must be provided for this purpose.

If a terminal is used for news media briefings, it must be an additional separate termiral.

There must be at least one hardcopy device available which is. capable of printing the displays en the CC's.

Bere must be at least one hard copy device capable of displaying graphics information. It is not necessary for tha graphics printer to have the resolution or color equivalent of the graphics screen.

2. Display Device Functional Descriptions For each parameter specified in 6.4 and

6.5 describe

a. We informatien to be displayed at the '

TSC and the EDF.

b. De forat in which it will be displayed.
c. De method required to irdtiate the display of the parameter. (i.e.,

cperator request, continucus display, etc.) --

d. Describe the method for display of trending information. ,
e. Describe the method for recall and display of historical data.

Page 7-3

LaSallo N

r

3. Display Device Hardware Description What equipnent is provided to display data in the ERF's?

CRT Te. h s: -

Vendor rane / Model htrier?

I/O data rates?

As a minimu:n CRT screen capacity should be 80 characters by 24 lines.

If the screens do not meet this requirement, specify their capacity and the justification for using the smaller capacity. . ,

Define any special ftnction keystroke input to be used.

htat is the physical screen size?

Is there control over the ch: exacter brightness? ,

If the termiral is intelligent, describe any special features that would be used, and how.

Hardcopy printers; Vendor name / Model nu: er?

1 Print rate (lines / minute)?

~

What is the nu=ber of characters per line?

htat is the character set available?

  • Does the printer .have graphics capabilities that will be used? If
so, what are they and how will they l be used?

r l

Page 7-4 l

(Dee;T

- Is the noise level generated by the printer when it is cperating acceptable for the envirc a nt in which it is located?

Graphics equip ent:

Is the display hardware raster er vector driven?

If the device is vector driven, what  ;

is the addressibility (number of spatial resolutien Inints en the display screen)? 512 X 256 is the minirm acceptable. .

What is the line width of vectors drawn? 0.05 inches is the raximum acceptable.

What '.s the speed at which vectors are drawn en the screen (full screen vectors er inches per second)? 50 ,

full screen vectors per second is' the minim e acceptable.

If the display is a raster device, the pixel si::e and

~

what is resoluticn (ntr-ber of pixels en the screen)?

i If the raster. device is =cnochrcce, how rany levels of gray are available? Ecw many are actually used?

If the device is colce, how rany different colcrs ray be displayed ,

simultaneously? How many are actually used?

What is the data transfer rate to the device? (specify pixels /second, vectors /second, or bits per second).

Does the data transfer rate suptort the device's display capability?

Page 7-5

IaSal19 .

. (ptENT r-

  • What is the refresh display rate of the display device? 30 Hertz is the '

.h acceptable refresh rate.

Does the device have har&are vector generation capability? ,

Does the device have hardware '

character generation capability?

4. Availability of functional display data to the ERF display systens
a. What is the maxi == resp nse time to queries for information required during an - -

emergency situation? 'Ihe ~ minimum acceptable resp nse time is three seconds for at least 90% of the queries for information.

b. If - a response takes longer than 2-3 seconds, is the operator informed that the .

requested operation is in progress? -

c. If the displayed data is inconsistent or-faulty, how is this deficiency indicated?
5. Functicral Display Format
a. What is the prirary format used for data display? (Actual exa=ples are preferred).
b. Is the display of sufficient quality and sirplicity that it may be seen and understood frcm the distances required by staff location? Factors to consider:

Is the most important infor: ration .

grouped in the upper-right-hand quadrant of the display?

How are related itens of information grouped together on the screen? .

How are sub-areas of the dis' play separated?

Page 7-6

CDt9ENf

- Does every display- page have a header, and are the headers consistent?

If color is used to highlight and differentiate prtiens of display formats, how ::eny different colors are used and for wt:at purgse is each used?

What other display di:nensions (reverse video, size, blinking characters, etc.) are used in the display for: cats and for what purpose is each used?

6. Operator Interface to Systen
a. Can tne operator call up cptional displays with si:nple word or keystroke corrand.3?

Some examples of concands should be provided.

b. htat is the ravi- time required to enter '

a request for informatien? (30 seconds-should be the raximum time) .

c. htat are the levels of expertise needed to cperate the systen? -
7. Funct.icnal Display Pcsiticn
a. htat is the nu 2er of displays in each -

facility (TSC and EOF)?'

b. What is the p sition cf each display device in the recm?
c. htat is the maxime:a nuder of peple who

. must view the display in an energency situation?

d. What are the distances and angles at which the display must be viewed?
e. Are there any rocm illumination controls which must be utilized for proper. viewing of the di.eplay devices?

Page 7-7

LaSalls *

. COMMENT T .

7.2 SES '

l. Availability of safety parameter data for -

the SES displays What are the safety parameters available to the SPDS? -

'Are there any ti:nes when any such -

parameters are unavailable?

2. Recognizability of the SES display Khat features of the SES display distinguish it from the other displays and devices in the ERF and control rocras? . .
3. SPDS Lccation
a. Describe the location cf the SES displays in the EPS's and control room. .
b. How does the location of the SES insure that it can be easily accessed by the .

staff rxr.bers requiring the safety infor=ation displayed?

c. Is the SPDS physically compatible with the existing facilities?
d. Does tne SES present a hazard er obstacle to nocr.al cperation.of the EPS?
4. SES Statfing The SES should require no staff in addition to that necessary for the operaticn of.the EPS. Ecw does the design of the SES insure that this is the case?

L 7.3 Other Display Devices t .

'If display devices other than those required by IURDG-0696 (EOF, TSC, and SPDS) are connected to the DAS, describe these devices and indicate their degt'ee of impact on DAS performance.

i l

Page 7-8 Se

LaSallo CD9ENT

8. Data Ca=unications 8.1 Description
1. Provision must be made for adequate and reliable transfer of data among the components of the Data Acquisition System, and between the Data Acquisition Syscem '

and the:

Technical Support Center Frergency Operations Facility Safety Parameter Display System displays Nuclear Data Link chcations equiprent Meteorological Data Facility

2. Provision must also be made for access to meteorological data in the DAS by the NRC Cperatiens Center, and certain state and ,

local agencies, if this service is not' provided by facilities other than the ERF.

3. Block diagrams should be provided to show these data paths and the methods of transmission empicyed.

8.2 General

1. Is the link capacity sufficient for the maximtra required rate of transmission?
2. Can all of the data channels meet the 0.01 unavailability requirement as defined in NUREG 0696, Section 1.5, under all

\

condit1cns above cold shutdown?

l

3. Is all powered data ecmmunications equignent on .an uninterruptible power supply?

l 4. How are the data chanrels protected from unauthorized modification?

Page 8-1 l

l l

l l

~

LaSalla

, N 'r -

7-

5. Are' all data ~ channels, plus egaitrent spares, tested as part of the periodic testing prograa?

8.3 Added Questiens for Cata Links Using EIA Standard Interfaces -

1. Do the voltage levels and irpedances -

conform to the standard?

2. Does the data rate adhere to the standard for the distance spanned?
3. Are cables and connectors apprcpriate to the standard?

8.4 Added Questions for Vcice-Fregaency Links

1. Is error detection and correction provided, if not otherwise supplied by the protocal?
2. What provision is made for testing the voice-frequency segments?
3. Is the data rate within the specification for the modes for the distance spanned?
4. Are spare mode =s s:cred en site?
5. Are there redundant. data links, physically separate and without cc:ren failure mode, in all locatiens where there is a
reascnable probability of service failure?

l .

! 8.5 Applicable Standards Tjpical standards that : ray be specified for serial data and control sigral transnission are:

EIA Standard RS-232-C. " Interface between data tecninal egai; ment and data corr:::enication egaipment -

eploying serial birary ~ data interchange." August 1969.

l l Page 8-2

1 y- ~ ~ ,

COMMEhT '

- FED-SID 1020.- " Electrical  ;

characteristics of balanced voltage l digital interface circuits."

Septenber 1975.

FED-SID 1030. " Electrical characteristics of unbalanced voltage digital interface circuits." '

Septenber 1975.

EIA Standard RS-422-A. " Elect ical characteristics of balanced voltage digital interface circuits."

December 1978.

EIA Standard RS-423-A. " Electrical characteristics of trialanced voltage digital interface circuits."

September 1978 I

EIA Standard RS-449. "Gereral purg se 37-position and 9 position' -

interface for data termiral equipnent and data circuit-termirating equipnent enploying serial binary ,

data interchange." Novenber 1977.

e i

e M

  • v 8

i u.

I Page 8-3 i -

LaSallo *

, CCEMENT T '

9. Wem Supp3rt Requirenees 9.1 Documentation
1. Describe the location where documentatien is stored and the personnel who require -

access to this doct=entation. 'Ihe minimum '

' documentation to be included must be a user or operators manual, functioral systen documentation, Fardware docu:nentation and software doctnentation.

2. User Docinentation
a. Is there an operator's manual or its equivalent for each display device or . .

facility that is adequate to explain the use of the display as well as instructions for resolving problens?

b. Does the documentation must include as a minista:

Table of Centents that is well .

indexed for easy reference?

Description of how to use the manual?

Systen startup procedure?

Systen failure procedare?

Reference to sup? ort services (both hardware and software)?

Operating instructions for each piece of equipmnt?

, Operating instructions for each

  • request the user ray initiate and response to be received?

References to other st:bsystens and doctrnents?

c. Is the user doctmentation ~ self supporting such that no other documentation is necessary to cperate the systen?

Page 9-1

LaSallo ,

CD9ENT d.' Does the user docunentation contain guidance on the limitation of ,

instrunent readings and their reliability following serious accidents?

3. Functional Systen Documentation
a. What docurentatien describes in detail the DAS, the ccmtnications systems and the display systens from a functional perspective, as well as ,

the means of implementation?

b. Does this documentation have reference to all documentation for subsystens which interface to the DAS, ccmtnications equipnent, and ,

display systens?

4. Hardware Doct:nentation -
a. What hardware documentation provides information for the engineers or .

technicians other than the systen designer to maintain the systen?

b. Does this hardware documentation -

include:

Theory of Operation?

Mechanical Prints?

Electrical Prints?

5. Software Doct=entation
a. Knat doct=entation is availabie to maintain and evaluate the software?
b. What procedures are to be followed to insure that the code contains sufficient coments for efficient maintenance and verification of the~-

software?

Page 9-2

LaSalls *

. (D9ENT T *

6. Documentation Update Procedure'
a. What procedure which has been - >

established for maintaining the manuals -and other necessary

&v ==ntation to assure that any changes in the DAS, comunications -

' systen or display systems are reflected in this documentation. '

b. Who will be responsible for the updates?

s 9.2 Training Training for operators and maintenance personnel must be provided.

1. User Training -

a.. How will operators of display systens be trained?

b. Who will perform this training?
c. What review of the training procedure will be followed to respond to changes in the systens?

l

2. Maintenance Tr:a.ning
a. How will the :naintenance personnel responsible for the DAS, m.. unications equipment and display i

devices be trained?

b. How will the training of personnel be verified?

l 9.3 Cpality Assurance -

1. Software verification / Validation _
a. What verification or validation ~ plan l has been developed for the software for the DAS and display systens?

1 Page 9-3 >

s,-*ww -----,e- y--, ,.g ,--c,,,--n.,,-,-.---n.,.-,_, - . , ,._.,-._,,...n , . _ - - . - . . ~ . , . _ , , , , . , , , , - - -, , - - , - - . . , . - + - - - - , - - , - - . - ,,e, -

A900 COMMENT }

.. a

, b.- Does the test plan outline procedures for testing the following error .

types?

Logic Errors h=antation Errors (especially in the User doctrantation)

Overload Errors Timing Errors Throughput and Capacity Errors-Fallback and P.ecovery Errors

c. Does the test plan specify the overall test and integration '

philosophy, strategies, - and methodologies to be eployed?

d. hh will perform the independent quality assurance function?
e. Is there an adequate method to verify

.that there is a correlation betwem output data from the DAS and readings observed by the operators in 'the-control roan? Describe this method. -

A string test frcm the individual sensor through the necessary processors and cables to the data output device shall be a part of this method.

2. Eardware Verification /Vr.lidation
a. hht is the verification or validation plan for the hardware

. necessary for the DAS, communications equi p t and display systems?

b. Who will perform the independent -

! quality assurance func* don on this -

hardware?

! Page 9-4 4

b

y. .---. . - - . . . . , - . . .__,_-y . _ _ _ . - . , . . , , , . . . . . , - , . - - -

- ~ _ -

ric:all o

. N 7 .

3. Systiem Iag
a. Will a system log be maintained? -
b. Minimtn infonnaticn in this log should be:

All system modifications All system failures including time, reason and resolution All planned outages 9

E I

I e

i 8

'M 4 I

t Page 9-5

,. ,n - , - - ,,-,,,,,r n ,,~..n ,.-~,.,-n.. . ~ . . . . . - , , , . , , ,- , _ , , ,,---e n, y-,--,--r- , -

m bto CJMMENT 9.4 Reliability NJREG-0696 specifies that data systers, instrumentation, and facilities of ERF's shall cperate with an unavailibity factor of 0.01, be down no more than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> per calander quarter, and be restorable within 30 minutes whenever the reactor is above cold shutdown status. Furthermore, any equipment affecting SICS shall operate with an unavailability factor of 0.2 during cold shutdown. Ia order to determine if DAS equignent, display devices, and cormunications equipnent meet this criterion, the following inforration must be reviewed:

a. For each of the following subsystems:

CAS equipment, Functional display devices, .

SPDS display devices, and Coccunications equignent, review the following:

What is the claimed mean time between failures?

What is the claimed mean time to repair?

htat is the v ndor's recommended preventive raintenance schedule?

What backup systens or components are provided?

. How much time is required to bring a backup systen on-lire?

b. How are these clairs justified?

(Valid examples include historical records of other users of similar equip::ent, vendor-provided records of long-term' test runs, and records of acceptance tests run on the proposed equipaent.)

Page 9-6

pw.pg

. CJMMEN1' r,-

  • 9.5 Maintenance In order to insure that the data systems, instrt::entation, and fa.cilities of ERF's meet the tnavailability requirenent the follcwing minimum hardware and software maintenance requirements should be reviewed. ,
1. . Hardware Mainterance ,
a. htat is the hardware raintenance plan?
b. How does the plan work to assure minimtra unavailability?
c. Concerning raintenance personnel: . .

htat personnel are identified for the DAS, comunications equiptent and display systes?

Where are these parsonnel located?

How are the personnel qualified '

for the hardware they will be working with?

d. Concerning spare parts:

htere are spare parts located for ministra practical replacenent time? ,

htere are critical itens located on-site?

~

! If spare parts are to be l supplied by outside sources, what is the raximtra availability l delay that can be assured? .

l-Is the quality of the spare

  • parts equivalent to the origiral l equignent?

l .

e. Is maintenance support equipnent available en demand?

l Page 9-7 i

J

CDOENT

, f. What is thm schedule and procedura for calibration and verification of test equipment?

2. Software Maintenance
a. hht is the software maintenance and re-verification plan?
b. .h h will maintain the software for the CAS and display syst es?
c. What is the procedure for providing adequate qualified backup software maintenance personnel?
d. What is the DAS update procedure?

Does this procedure insure that: -

01anges to the software are authorized?

Any changes to the software are adequately tested and validated before they are implenented?

A . description and date of the change have been recorded in a manner which can be easily "

reviewed?

l t

i u .

Page 9-8 e

. - - , ~ , , , , - , --- ->v., , , e.-,-, ,,-w- ,--,-+--.n - . . . , . .

-- - - . - - - - - , - , ,+ --,--w