ML20011A635

Supplemental Response to Significant Deficiency Rept SD 413/81-16 Re 6-inch Figure 261 Riser Clamp,Initially Reported on 810810.Clamp Had Been Returned by Different Customer.Qa Surveillance Will Be Increased

ML20011A635
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	10/20/1981
From:	Parker W DUKE POWER CO.
To:	O Reilly J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8110290210
Download: ML20011A635 (2)

Text

. _ _. _

~

a e

DUKEjEPlFOylh PLNY PONER NILDING 4aa Sourn Cnuncu STnzer, C wTgIg N. C. 2824a WILLIAM t.,. PA R K E R, J R.

Vicr PotslDENT ItLEPHONE: Aata 704 sita P=oovcvio.

October 20, 1981 3 7 3-4c e s

~ 's s y;g,in )i}D,

.l~

Mr. Janes P. O' Reilly, Director

\\,'/'

, 'i,.

f

,,..f,,._

//(('s/ / / /,g L'.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commisolon 0,'

. /,P.i p/,

i Region II J

gb3lu v

3_

"* - [ O /cgI'

'p' 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 c q4Qpr"'s o

/.

Re:

Catawba Nuclear Station g 'xh 'gg Unit 1 p

dj7 j Docket No. 50-413

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55e, please find attached a supplementary response to Significant Deficiency Report SD 413/81-16.

Very truly yours, I

I fg

}.

William O. Parker, Jr.

RWO:ls Attachment cc:

Director Resident Inspector Office of Inspection and Enforcement Nuclear Regulatory Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Catawba Nuclear Station Washington, D. C.

20555 12:> 7

.s 1

I 8110290210 811020.

PDR ADOCK 05000413 S

PDR

p_

' y g.

's

+

,e r

r CATAWBA NUCLEAR. STATION s

2 r'

SD 413/81.

Report Number:

y n&

Report Date: October 20,'1981 S.

~' Facility: Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit 1 ~

j;

- Identification of Deficiency:

Safety related' materialsfrom an. unapproved ;

supplier.

CA-81-34.

- Description of Deficiency: A 6" size figure'261 riser clamp, produced by-ITT Grinnell's Henderson Tennessee Manufacturing n

i facility, was shipped from-the Warren Plant for use on a safety ~related-system.'

l Also see significant deficiency _ report dated.

August 10, 1981.

Supplementary Report:

Based on. conversation with-ITTLGrinnell, this clamp vas a return item from'a different' customer and was not placed back-into.11T's warehouse at the proper location..Thus,-

4 when filling Duke Power's order, the' clamp was mistakenly -

shipped to.the Catawba' Site.

ITT's' QA Program.would have.

prevented any Henderson material from being shipped to Duke Power had the material. beer. placed in the proper location.

ITT has reviewed several of Duke Power's. shop I

order releases and has found.that no other-Henderson material was shipped.

!=

1:

Design. Engineering has reviewed their procurement documents and found that all Catawba NuclearLSafety-Related component support parts supplied.by ITT Grinnell were ordered under a 4

~

i Procurement Specification, Purchase Requisitian and Purchase Order that required Nuclear Safety-Related parts to be ~

i manufactured under a minimum ANSI N45.2 Quality' Assurance Program.. Our assurance that Grinnell is.following;these requirements is our Quality Assurance Audit and Surveillance -

I visits. However, to minimize'the possibility of:ITT Grinnell making another error, our Material Procurement:

Personnel now use a' listing of those'ITT Grinnell' Catalog-pro' ducts which are not produced or shipped to the require-ments of an ANSI N45.2. Program. Products shown~on this.

listing have not been ordered for Nuclear Safety-Related application - since mid-April, ' 1981. In addition, we will review 'our records to assure that products' shown on the. ITT

[

Grinnell'11 sting have not been previously ' ordered for Nuclear l'

Safety-Related application. We-plan'to complete-this 3_

review by January 1, '1982.

~

n f

. z 2

~