ML19259B380

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Opposes Issuance of Operating License.Kepford 781204 Ltr, Addl Info, & News Article Encl
ML19259B380
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/18/1979
From: Zitzer P
COMMITTEE FOR APPLICATION OF NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
To: Igne E
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
References
NUDOCS 7902090096
Download: ML19259B380 (9)


Text

-

y e,.

-4 * %c-

, '__- w.m at:3TQ

'fi" f E QQIQOCUMENT ROOM g.,3 -c 4

l JUSTICE rm ', Committee ta, Application of #; o 8 7 -

Nuremberg Principles -

to IJ.S. Nuclear Power Production  % c@.$l** f, Route 4. Box 332

  • Scottsboro, Alabama 35768 e Telephone 20 y' [ jme $,

.....,-K --

m .. . ..

CH AIR M AN '

Bill Carner. hq g , U : . p *,* 1[, 1 }' .

Scottiboro. AL

    • ""5 Mr. Elipi Lo ~r. Icne Dr. Iohn W Cof m'"

San Francnco. CA A i W r / ~' o ' --i; '; > e n w' ar- S d--'; ria Dr Chauncey Keptord

  • O W * '3 .c y oFiiD3 ion seat, Con.... PA '41 shin;: ton, J.C. 20555 Dr Bruce von Zellen

"' Re; Operating

  • icense .-iewinr' f o r -

3,. l e m 'u - i - .

Or ludith Johnsurd ,

sai, coii,... pA Jsn. 24, 1,17')

bdnev I Coodman. PE r.<~us. ~ l pe p yr, 5gne:

Helen Mills Atlanta. CA uaniyn sh,n.riu, '.h s '. re qh o;p s e r k i s n a.T.c o .c w. r.' p u t . ' i r. - l t @ NN Daaib. It for Salem Uni'. 2 for ' he followin:, reasons:

Larry Bogart Allendale. NI to

1) ,Je are in '<reenen wit.h Jr. r._.>pfori's s n ' , m '.

Virginaa Southard Ha,nshu,,. r A Dr. G reenwo: -1, Of fice of Sciend a Techs.loEy F:lic',,

Anna Mayo SXecU ni'/ P Office of 'he Pr" sic.en', " The rite wt

. w' .1 ' ic Neve York. NY q g j.fy. g g { ,,g g{gg gg g

  • p,g 4,7eq , ,g , . g. {

['l[j'," r'31oactive wts'e; h.a,n tc. inn G we c -n hal ' h = p r -.

t;c tion of s nese was t.es . " :-)gm ,, n c ., ,s .,., ,., .,. .1 e ... ., ,.t.

2) The applic nt, has olrc ady rc 'vec te i per":13rion for ; -

creaaed scent nucima.r f :"1 roa r'or>:e o" h- ile9 si'=. lore creek I n: II nre on ht s <:o ci amroximcelc 10) in: o cons ruction.

3) Tho inability to ti.; rom of exis.i " wus as, '

- v :/ e -

in *.he ": cent I.R.G. recor , - ke s i'- imp >r to th- .r-

" limit "h< proolen" nc 1 i?y f n- ine .h. f :r er e ,

nuclenr resctors until and :nlo: ; p'rnnnen* .. W "i:-

pos,1 cor .n f :11 p -io't of ' o xic i

, 'r hw c te' l e v.n-c ~. ra t e-i te wnck.

4) Le-islation introh ed on J,n. 16 ,19 7 9 .;f .. .. J e r n'.

le-islor.orr would pr ment ary "cicle ,r pl m- "m y: .

operating from star'.in.r up un..il .3 ^ n; :le r .qs n disnoso.1 problem is solved. 2nis aill wa:ld af/ect S a.le n 2 ' n:i d o ce O r k 1 ini 2 ( see enclo: ni n" ;cl )

1"o i s s ho u l-1 iciicute st rcn- '? .ulic o proai . icn.

5) There is in unus :.1 concentrv ion of n. clear ..e,er pl . c in thi? 'a.r v t under vo.rious s;n.~es of construct.'.on 2n. '

o pc rv. :. n ( 3e- enclosed map).

6) Pen.ch Sot tem, only 35 miles f rom Artifici il Inlon i (. '

recm.1.' re'eive:t p .ission "o ince cse 'he ;r nt fC .

storwe ^anacity fra. 2220 to 5%3 ,c emLlies.

.THIS DOCUMENT CONTAW$ 790209 O 0 74

  • P0OR QUAUTY PAGES

.1 -

7) See enclosed Inlivid'nl 51:.e H.atiae, for Fe = 0h co r Docket 5c-277 Acril 197S : " Leas- sar. sina in a icr 1.

Pocres! Enn, gelt 'n-" .

8) See enclosed In ilvid "

nl 31:e Ra',in ; for S'lem I, Jacke- , . -

272 April, 1978 : The plant con . col ronm me icn1 ned in-ho'tse- it is a disaster waitin- to hspnen."

4) The excess ranerating capacit3 of ench of 'he joir/ ouna ~s of S,lem 2 is acproaching 5CM. Ther- is no n"ed for power.
10) R, don releases and associated he'ith effects resul.ing fron the opera . ion of So.len 2 mus' be considered in ter~a of the cost benefit baltnce. Docke 5C-354 s 355

Licensee = ' Answer to motion to Consolida*.e Proce tin s to receive new evidance with regard to radon releases nn-ascociated health effects" . :iny 9,1978:

It mus*. be rerembered thu , at least for .he Hope Creek and Peach Bottom proceedings, .iw .,r.ce l Soc.rds have already considered the toestion of whether 'he cost-cenefit balance for the f tcility or unit in question tips or cight tip in f. var of abandonment of .he facility, in li -h of *he in:~ in fuel cycle."

In view of the above, it is evident that pu'olic senti mn*

runs counter to further lic-:nsing of niclent power plants.

Creation of more waste is morally indefensible. I nvolunt a ry exposure to damaginr radiation is in violation of civil ri nht .,

causing health effects (deaths) to the <:enerr.1 po ov la t ion ,

as thoroughly exposed in the Honicker vs. Hendrie Peti *. inn.

We sea no reanon why the lertl principlos of individual rasponsibility estanliched a- the .'iurambu rg : rials shaul:i nc* also sonly tn the Officials of the U.S.Governman- who betray tha public trust and s a f-> y .

Sincerely 1 -

k YW Phyllis Zitzer Box 207 Salford, Pa. 18957 cc: Commissioners 215-2c7-7459 Hendrie Kennedy Bradford Gilinski Ahearn

s -

o

  • i g N

JUSTICE Committee for Application of Nuremberg Principles -

8 g , $

to U.S. Nuclear Power Production D .Afl."fl > du g . ,.f.

Route 4. Box 332 e Scottsboro. Alabama 35768 e Telephone 2 g, A Tic'[ 'Y, g// wf CHAIRMAN Bill Carner, E sq ,.

Scottsboro. AL 3eC. ~, ' 7, :

utMatal Os lohn w Cotman San Francisco. CA )r. Te'1 Creen> food l Dr Chauncey Kepford Office of Science and Technolon' Folicy ,

C"'^

Executive Office of the PresidsIt l,r,'y

' "fe( " "'"

,x Washington, D.C. 20500 Dr Judith Johnsurd

  • 5 tate CoHege. PA Sidney i Coodman. PE * /

Pan aus.NI

Dear Dr. Green,

ood, '

Helen Mells Anania. C A This letter contains a very 'orief summary of my Marilyn 5hinetlus DeKalb. Il Comments, obserV:ltions, and opi' liens concernin'; the "Subg. 'up 41 3 ,

7g ,

'Ond' A e'$, '4astes," TID-28818. The reasons for this brief summary ar -

v,,,,nia 50utha,d due to the distressingly short comment period, the unorte;-

Harnsburg. PA period yet during which the Sub ;rcup neport .n3 a v a i h ::'. " ,

^""'g,'[ ,

, and the volume of my notes on ';;e raport. These notes ! li Philhs Zitre, os di.gested, transcribed, and forewarded as soon as is Salford. PA possible.

Contrary to the assertion of the authors of the Sub: con ~

Report (pane 16, first fall sen ence), I submit that s Nn action alone will be the detern. tin ~ factor with re; ara -

the fate of radionuclides in any renository or other du.1p site. After all, human action created the wastes, and has delayed for years the need for a solution to the proble:r..

Human action alone now has created a climate of rush to a;s-pose of them. Human action alone will ietermine the tina, place, nelium, depth, method, mckaging, and moon, of radi,-

active waste disposal. It must also ce realized that it .:.11 also be human action alone which will lead to cost-saving arocions of marcins of safety for uhatever rencsitory la chosen. Human action alone cin cause the effectiveness of any or all of the barriers between any disposei-of radnas; e and the biosphere to be partially or fllly dercated. All .if the grandiose plans, pronices of " technologica 1 success" '..t, s "procr mna-.ic success" ( p. 44) , reliance on " re' tln. tor;y r. -

Ttirements" (p. 45) , and imitation information ( conularly referred to as numbers derived from risk assessmenh) in tra end are self-deluding and self-defeatinr. In addition, s:.. n management schemes are but components of a vicious shell- ame designed '.o keep a'.tention from oeine caid to 'ne only .

relevant question, the question of dtrational success: car. a repository be prepared '.o concain all ridwastes ninced in it for the duration of the toxic ceriod of the unst.es? t' s . m 2.,

anuropriate to remind the Ttthors of '.he Sub,;roup Heport of the old hosnital joke: 1% operation was a success, but the

/

JUSTICE Committee for Application or Nuremberg Principles to U.S. Nuclear Power Production Route 4, Box 332

  • Scottsboro Alabama 35768 e Telephone 205/259-5770 cH AIR M AN Bill Carner, E sq

$cottsboro. AL MEMeill Dr lohn W. Cofman son rranano. c^ catient died anyway. The implications for r' 42 u -t re Ch

,',,, c',"",',','"p'[*'d ominoIs.It is not what is said, prsu.isei, chic"' 'r W-o, e m e ,on zenen mated, testifiad ' M': t , liscensed, rectl,ted, system 4 tim.e'.,

DeKalb, ll managed, or fantasized that co' tnt s ; all that coun;s is .m2.t Or judith lohnsurd is actually done with the wastes. inis, in . urn, is de fr-

' ""^

%dneyi Coodman. PE mined by human action ' 9ne.

Paramus NJ Helen Mells The real question of the possibility (or probacility)

^"*"C^ of d1 rational success goes conpletely unanswered in the

",'$i" 5"'"'"*'

t Subgroup Report. l'o evade this question and offer the ustne-tany so ari tically feeble hope of but a few thousand years of cont.ain-Annad*. N1 ment (p. 16, for instanca) is just one of the can'.' retre:

  • Virgmia $outhard from safety - and credibility - that So thoroUChly per'eareS

"'"$,'[^ this report. This attitude a;oes a long way r.oward cuar tee ~ing New York, NY thO report of the stupid Dureaucratic blunders that cCUSM Philles Zitzer the irradiation of the entire world's population throu n :. ub Salf ord. PA

6. e d h% with the subsequent tragedies: the uranium rinen deaths due to lung cancer, the enhanced cancer rates vo r.2 bomb blast observers (like Smokey), and others. Polic- must not be allowed to be a substit :e for safeny and the durational success of any radwaste repository, be it high-or low leve1, TRU waste, or mill tailings.

I trr;ently req'tes t that you infern whoever it is in this covernment that the public that was to easily (and rm.'inely) hoodwinked and lied to in the past by the apo l ? -in' .; rar .ne nuclear industry has changed. The puclic is increasingly .nd rapidly becominq aware of the nature of the radw,nte t'r'bl.-

and the cause of the problen: *he rmiwaste problem La a production problem. Human action alone prodices radioactive waste; human ,ation alone can halt the prcduction of t nece wastes. I see'no reason why the legal principles of individ-ual responsibility established at the Nurenburg trials sW'uld not also apply to the officials of the i, .S. Government who betray the public trust and safety.

' fours sincerely, Dr. ChTmcey Kepfn"-

L33 erlando Av".

State Collere, Pa.

69

s. .

4 e Addendum to Individual Site .

Ratings from the IE Employee survay on Svaluation of Licensees - April 1978 Docket No.: 50-272 Site: Salem Answers to Question 17 (If a change to safety level occurred, please describe it briefly):

Relatively new plant. Still has growing pains. Needs close attention (by IE) to assure appropriate improu2ments are made.

Power ascension testing revealed problems that were corrected by management, both in hardware and procedures.

Answers to Question 18 (Are there other things we should censider abcut the safety of this plant?):

-k The plant control rocm was designed in-house - it is a disaster waiting

? .- -

In startup phase. Have had a number of problems. This can be due either to poor f ystem or poor management or the " normal" failures when new systems sre placed into service.

Design (,f controls with back-lighted pushbottons results in operator data assessment problems, especially when lights are burned out. Manage-ment is aware of problem and IE is folicwing up.

New plant - recently completed full power testing'- plant still in early operating phases.

.ON  :

r- .. } st.-

~

u' -.

%f .

w i

.. a =', ,

J QA h ,{e .

s

[U 4G g; y s J/ \

'is s J

s

~e . < , v, 3..

p.. .,

"Ho..?..w:Clg.x_,,4 . _., ., .. y ,ose a ll b bi !hIlkb hi [

['_ . -

.- . s t, ,,';*~

l ., .- d.

t Y p , , , , , o LIMERICr. &2

  • Trenten

(

gTHPIE MILE - SLAIO 9

e s cast r e .hi adelph a FpACH E i CM 1 2, , e e- 11es

, __e 1

'ewa k S 'lM 1 & 2 CYS3R C?IEK .9 h

I

/ V

, ~, F A .& ,

1 Atlantic City 8

  • 3a' 6 ore w.._...--

l ATLATIC CCY 1 & 2 k*innapclig

(

Lewes.

q/

3,geord hCpersting

\ aLaurel d 'c'9[,ji ru:* ion 1

y kCALtz .I CLIFF 3 N g',

d ,cro:csed

)

\

The hazards of nuclear power

, ~. e

,0, see,, . .g %. na.,e m , . , ., s .C. r ,.e . . . .

vc o...:., .

Or 0, or st ,* stoons tivt h,ts in en s e%q !s 't e p u.t sus s e.fr s, at .nu e,, ~ Or e 'o -ri:s ;Wru y.

es'verosuseer,sl gvo% ' osi , es sit s it ects< 5 *rt .. ,rvier Q#4 e'e r$

4

,,M t *. .#d eAf A erl Co%Cr*rt aliQ *Ur h s Ort Ol'f s CrJIPCI One for'ri;Y TO siirtitrL truie* TH** C'9 tit'A'10'On s w'c*$ orf nuC' ear podea r Here as ah.1f he **o'e The vocal and increas4ngty achve oC0Cne"ts Cl the nat:Cn 1 atorne erargy prCgrams 'n.

VariaCly t)ase !betr CCCos t on on tre DCter'tial aangers int'erer't a the g*neration Cf pcwer from r'UC' ear fueis Are it'ev typothesZ ng proolems that are of the one..n.a.mdhon. Chance war,ety7 Are their Conceres more fantasy 'han f 3Ct?

A review of the ts'e'y record of domeshC PuC' ear f 3Caties durmg the past livee decades reveals a history of *erleer deaths. plant accidents. acts of terroris% 3M Cther inCrediOle mishaps in f 3Cf atmost every ' oae.m.a-rrdhen cCCurrence has alreade CCCurred as well as a nurr'ter of irCidenes *hCse procaDdity was Considered to s'at st:Catfy minute as to nCt C4 worth evalualmg Mereas federal and er'Custr'al syCkescersons have antolted the safety reCCrd of nuCtear power. studies assued-tut kept uncuthCiled-Oy the o*d A10mic E ergy Commiss.on. tre NuC' ear Peguiatory Commission. and o'hef agenC:es document a far differget story They

~

report that m tre preveCus 33 yea's. 'here have teen over to 000 disaehrig 4 0rk it'ivr'es at CCrrest.C nuC! ear facilat es mCluding more than 300 f atant es wunc'*ds of o'rer *orkers are esceCted to d e Cf ra$ation-mduced Cancers by 1990 a In the past seven years, the'e have teen 150 mstances Cf threats a;3.nst PuC' ear msta lations aCross !he Q $ Thesg have inClyded lhree Ca$es M *heCh Def"Os we'e suCCessfvHy planted Ch f3C6bty sites and several estances of ars;n .n which rra.or fwe das93;e resulted On the a erage. NAC foses tor has ha3 st: eni as much as 'C0 :b of uranium and 60 to of pwnium every year-enougn to make mere 'han 10 atomic tomCs

" Acts Cf God ' also ha.e ' amen tre'r toil U ntn'eg and CCid weather ha.e d sated c' ant safe'y/seCarity systems Ga'e 'CrCe winds damaged AEC s Amarillo. Tee . faraty m 1967 A torrado passed 'hacugn the sile Cf a lWCpCsed O' ant +n Cimon Scr cgs Tenn . aM anciPer Came *dhm 10 mies of an oCeratirsg reactor m Ateens, Ala $everal reactors are Dudt rear or astride geo'og' Cal faults e.!Per known to te or susceCted Cf Demg sh:13Cbve. inC:ud ng several that have eacertenced quares this Century. On at least 1mo oCCassCns. B.52 bomters have CrasPed **thm s,get of nuclear facihties The poner levet of fiss,ie syS ems has tecor*e urCCntrcitab.e Cn 26 occasions m IPe Cast three CeCades, tr5at is, nure3r aCCtdents e'th*r occur'ed or were lust avo*Ced Ibese CC!vde a Core meltdown at the first expenmental bre* der reactor <n 13H as *el as a cartial fuet meitdown of the brmii breeder aear Ce'roit m 1366 The eeu.cucoCazad 1375 Ero*n s Ferry fire started *dh a wor =** "are6*ssir us.ng a Cand:e to test fCr an le3hs. it enced with reost of the c! ant s saf*'y sys' ems renderes ecoer. tie a^d more 'han $50 remon a damages T%s *hde PUC!93r ssCCGriers have g'or'f'ed the'r tr'dustry m terms tot have ') ordered on outrignt f 3orication sercos imshaps have been o Curring with frigh'*amg regatarity Tl**re are alt *rnatives. however, to CCntmued e Cosure to such M4: arcs *4uC'e3r Co*e' cresertty const:tutes oniv 3 % of 'ctal domest C energy Consumption T5at is a Contrioution to the eat on s er'ergy tucget *hich could te easy e,r9 mated t% rough s.mc'e CCeservat'on strveg es or thrCugn tne rec

  • men'ation Cf cresentty availacle and Cost-CerrCe'itae sciar tecnnoteg es Moreover nureerous sdces essoed oy tre Energy Pet *3rCn & cevelocment Acm.nistrancn and tne F ecersi Energy Acm.nisirat on confirm that fuste ererCy eeeds trat aould emerwise ta ma' nem nuciear ocwer Can a so te sat sded weh Conservation. sorar and mind technoiog es For these resscns. 'he t) $ should imm*di3:ety feCtare a mor3'Ormm on oem reactor CCnstruCSCn aut teCm a gna;ecut of ad eos' og nuctear prog'sms C*er inan paraacs 50r*e resserch eltarts '

Our esoer ence *,tn rmCtear f aCiht es has aireur o' oven the ' ruth cf Wrp's, s Law anytn.ng Can pCsses go $rCng. :t aril ' f,,rmer test da'a ve not acaded C One of s series of editariC 3 en m:c'est power in ~Chenica: and Engineering Neus' heerinted by -a

  • scian 'f the ~tF ishers.

t' ~ m ze r*~~:-"-"r"- ic to The purpose of the CW ~" r^r pottpone the construction of nue: ewr f acilities in le: aware r.til sstisfactory ans"ers have been previded to a nr.ter of questi ns, including:

1. Will radicactive naterial esesce?
2. Has a solution baen denenstrated for disposai of rsdiotetive weste?
3. Has full insurance protection been provided?
4. Is there an adequ3te evacustien plan in case of *ccident?
5. Are there adequate ssfeguards against theft ud sabotage?

To accomplish this purpose, the CCALITION focuse9 cublic attention on the dmgers of nuclear techno1cgy, informs the pubiic ss to the availability of ele m , sife and eccno-ical energy < ternatives, ?nd takes non-violent, direct action to oppcse policies which #eopardice the health and safety of the enti re hnsn race.

JOIN US IF 'iCU AGFIE WT H CL"a A.3 : C:T?

3Q West 2 th St.

Wilmington, EE 19302 Phone 6:2-2M6

^

.. .~. .

Addendum to Individual Site ,

RatinJs from the IE Employee survay on Evaluation of Licensees - April 1978 Docket No.: 50-277 Site: Peach Bottcm

, Answers to Question 17 (If a char.ge to safety level occurred, pledse describe it briefly):

(I Plant radiaticn levels have been increasing with time. Cesign and staffing of plant apper to have not been capable of handling this 7 change. Management he ;een slow to take large step changes to correct

{ problems.

Back to back t,verhaul/ upkeep periods for units 2 & 3 appear to have produced a tired operating group prone to error.

Careless operations and poor maintenance.

Corrective action taken to repair core spray line cracks, feedwater spargers and nozzles and control rod drive return nozzle.

Licensee made significant effort to reduce routine radioactive release from reactor building vents through equipment repairs.

Answers to Question 18 (Are there other things we should consider abcut the safety of this plant?):

See questien 69 and 28.

u QA program not upgraded to current standards. Security not upgraded.

Many repeat items of nonccmpliance. Least safe site in Regicn Z1 Poorest management!

m m..

Quality of people (i.e., technical educaticnal level) that are coerating a plant and the type of organizational structure they are placed in can have a significant impact on safety.

Higher number of inspections due to proximity to regional office.

Recent management meeting with the President - expect to determine by scheduled inspections in the next 30 days if significant improvements were made.

Plant management exhibits an appearance of attempting to " control" N "

inspector access thru continual escort - general attitude apcears to be one of ccmpliance as required instead of an aggressive prosecuticn of management controls.

The problem with this plant is that it is a big BWR - by definition, they will have problems unless they have a good op. staff. PB does...

Upgrading of requirements upon this licensee, particularly in cases of security and QA.

7(*/- ( ( GN.pn .

3/ .

ja C ,- .~ ~ ,

, , 's j . 1 <

^

Legislation may halt

Salem ~ Il reactor start By DAVID AI.TANElt n t Salem I, already bill through legislature in time to stop Sunbeam Staff 7.E bul sponsored.in operation,liy Assemblyman the commercial operation of Salem II,

. SALEM ' A billirtrr*tmed ves'erday Donald Stewart ( D-3i and Donald scheduled far a mid-summer start.up, in ibe AsseffibWTwould prevent any - DiFrancesco 422), would not allow lie added that he thcught the bill had a

~?tTiear platit not yet opetating frop M utilities to include costs incurred in gomi chance of:;'opping the construction I

si.srang u;iTniit the nuclear waste the maintenance and operation of a of ifope Creek I and II, if the govern, dupmai protnem is solved. _ nuclear plant in their base utility rates. ment fails to solve the waste problem.

up _ teih _ wound 4 -- 'v affect Stewart said yesterday that the bill's The bill s intention is not to stop the Glem 11 and ifope Creek I and II, h"' sponsors wou!d be alming to push the h nuc car p r, St rt said,

~ g

'- . . 4, , , ,y ' ' ', solve the prr,blem of permanent storage of spent fuel rods and other radioactive was:e products.

"We're not saying 'we want this: we want that,' all we're saying is that somebody better come up with something," Stewart said.

S'ewart added that he wanted to prevent South Jersey from becoming the

" nuclear dumping ground of the na tion."

Nuclear waste disposal is a con-troversial issue almost everywhere there are nuclear plants. Several states

  • Sole m II have passed legislation forbidding dt>9"s i o" 'aetr >>"d "d 9" tite rirm-havg not been able to reprocess the spent fuel ever since President Carter (Continued frcm page 1) put a moratorium on reprocessing probably speeded up work on this bill, shortly after taking office.

Stewart said, but it had been in the Stewart said he believed the solution works long before last week. 10 nuclear waste was technologically But Stewart said he thought this bill feasible, and he hoped that the bill w ould would indirectly help LAC's effort to tune federal otficials "put their money keep its money, by educating the where their mouth is."

legislators on hazards that go with its "I expect it to get the government mdlions. moving," Stewart said.

"I think when we talk about this,75 Stewart said he thought that " North percent of the legislators don't know Jersey media" would say that this bill whal we're talking about," Stewart said. came as a direct result of Governor "This wi!! help the legislators realize Brendan Bryne's State of the State there are two sides to the story." message. in which he smgfed out Lower Public Service Electric and Gas Alloways Creek's multi million dollar spokesman Edward Anderson said the gross receipts revenues as funds that utility did not want io comment on the should be used for urban aid.

bill at such an early stage cf its The governor's remarks last week development. (Continueo on Page 3)

But speaking generally, he warned Ihat any de'ay in the start-up of Salem II * -

would cost consumers millions of dollars.

as.m