Letter Sequence Meeting |
|---|
TAC:MF2400, Control Room Habitability (Approved, Closed) TAC:MF2401, Control Room Habitability (Approved, Closed) TAC:MF2402, Control Room Habitability (Open) TAC:MF2403, Control Room Habitability (Open) TAC:MF2404, Control Room Habitability (Open) TAC:MF2405, Control Room Habitability (Open) TAC:MF2406, Control Room Habitability (Open) TAC:MF2407, Control Room Habitability (Open) TAC:MF2408, Control Room Habitability (Open) TAC:MF2409, Control Room Habitability (Open) |
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
Administration
- Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance
- Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting
Results
Other: ML13295A222, ML13323A183, ML13323A186, ML13323A189, ML13323A190, ML13323A191, ML13323B187, ML13323B188, ML13323B191, ML13323B194, ML13323B196, ML13323B198, ML13323B199, ML13323B200, ML13323B201, ML13323B202, ML13323B204, ML13323B207, ML13323B208, ML13323B209, ML13338A165, ML14015A312, ML14052A053, ML14072A076, ML14086A386, ML14086A387, ML14087A126, ML14149A089, ML14149A353, ML14149A354, ML14149A434, ML14149A435, ML14149A437, ML14178A481, ML14178A485, ML14202A045, ML14321A438, ML14321A677, ML14344A545, ML14344A546, ML14344A547, ML14349A790, ML15072A092, ML15091A440, ML15119A326, ML15175A024, ML15183A007, ML15183A009, ML15246A126, ML15246A128... further results
|
MONTHYEARML13323B1962012-06-12012 June 2012
Attachment 4: CHLE-008, Rev. 3, Debris Bed Preparation and Formation Test Results
Project stage: Other
ML13323B1942012-08-11011 August 2012
Attachment 3: CHLE-007, Rev. 3, Debris Bed Requirements and Preparation Procedures
Project stage: Other
NOC-AE-13003040, Attachment 1: CHLE-005, Rev. 1, Determination of the Initial Pool Chemistry for the Chle Test.2012-08-13013 August 2012
Attachment 1: CHLE-005, Rev. 1, Determination of the Initial Pool Chemistry for the Chle Test.
Project stage: Other
ML13323B1882012-08-13013 August 2012
Attachment 1: CHLE-005, Rev. 1, Determination of the Initial Pool Chemistry for the Chle Test
Project stage: Other
ML13323B1912012-08-14014 August 2012
Attachment 2: CHLE-006, Rev. 1, STP Material Calculations
Project stage: Other
ML13323B1982012-08-19019 August 2012
Attachment 5: CHLE-010, Rev. 2, Chle Tank Test Results for Blended and NEI Fiber Beds with Aluminum Addition
Project stage: Other
ML13323B1992013-01-0909 January 2013
Attachment 6: CHLE-012, Rev. 3, T1 Mbloca Test Report, Cover Through Figure 52
Project stage: Other
ML13323B2002013-01-0909 January 2013
Attachment 6: CHLE-012, Rev. 3, T1 Mbloca Test Report, Figure 53 Through End
Project stage: Other
ML13323B2022013-01-15015 January 2013
Attachment 8: CHLE-015, Rev. 3, Summary of Chemical Effects Testing in 2012 for STP GSI-191 License Submittal
Project stage: Other
ML13323B2012013-01-22022 January 2013
Attachment 7: CHLE-014, Rev. 2, T2 LBLOCA Test Report
Project stage: Other
ML13323B2042013-01-22022 January 2013
Attachment 9: CHLE-016, Rev. 2, Calculated Material Release to Estimate Chemical Effects
Project stage: Other
ML13043A0132013-01-31031 January 2013
Pilot Submittal and Request for Exemption for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191
Project stage: Request
ML13214A0312013-08-13013 August 2013
Acceptance Review, Exemption Requests and License Amendment Request to Revise UFSAR for Resolution of Generic Safety Issue 191, Assessment of Debris Accumulation on PWR Sump Performance (TAC MF0613-MF0614; MF2400-09)
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML13323B2072013-09-16016 September 2013
Attachment 10: CHLE-018, Rev. 2, Results of Bench Tests to Assess Corrosion of Aluminum in STP Containment Conditions
Project stage: Other
ML13323B2082013-09-23023 September 2013
Attachment 11: CHLE-019, Rev. 2, Test Results for Chemical Effect Tests Stimulating Corrosion and Precipitation (T3 & T4)
Project stage: Other
NOC-AE-13003039, Corrections to Information Provided in Revised STP Pilot Submittal and Requests for Exemptions and License Amendment for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolving Generic Safety Issue (GSI)2013-10-0303 October 2013
Corrections to Information Provided in Revised STP Pilot Submittal and Requests for Exemptions and License Amendment for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolving Generic Safety Issue (GSI)
Project stage: Other
ML13295A2222013-10-0303 October 2013
Corrections to Information Provided in Revised STP Pilot Submittal and Requests for Exemptions and License Amendment for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolving Generic Safety Issue (GSI)
Project stage: Other
ML13323B2092013-10-0404 October 2013
Attachment 12: CHLE-020, Rev. 2, Test Results for a 10-day Chemical Effects Test Simulating LBLOCA Conditions (T5)
Project stage: Other
ML13323A1892013-10-22022 October 2013
Enclosure 4-2 - Risk-Informed Closure of GSI-191, Volume 2 Probabilistic Risk Analysis
Project stage: Other
ML13323B1872013-10-31031 October 2013
Submittal of GSI-191 Chemical Effects Test Reports
Project stage: Other
ML13323A1912013-11-0606 November 2013
Enclosure 4-3 Risk-Informed Closure of GSI-191, Volume 3, Engineering (Casa Grande) Analysis, Page 212 of 1-122
Project stage: Other
ML13323A1902013-11-0606 November 2013
Enclosure 4-3 Risk-Informed Closure of GSI-191, Volume 3, Engineering (Casa Grande) Analysis, Cover - Page 211 of 248
Project stage: Other
ML13323A1862013-11-12012 November 2013
Enclosure 4-1 - Risk-Informed Closure of GSI-191, Volume 1
Project stage: Other
ML13323A1852013-11-13013 November 2013
Enclosure 3 - License Amendment Request for STP Piloted Risk-Informed Approach to Closure for GSI-191
Project stage: Request
NOC-AE-13003043, Enclosure 5 - Response to NRC Supplemental Information Items2013-11-13013 November 2013
Enclosure 5 - Response to NRC Supplemental Information Items
Project stage: Supplement
ML13323A1922013-11-13013 November 2013
Enclosure 5 - Response to NRC Supplemental Information Items
Project stage: Supplement
ML13316B9052013-11-13013 November 2013
Albrz Testing Update for NRR Final
Project stage: Request
ML13323A1832013-11-13013 November 2013
To Revised STP Pilot Submittal and Requests for Exemptions and License Amendment for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolving Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191
Project stage: Other
ML13338A1652013-11-21021 November 2013
To Revised STP Pilot Submittal for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolving Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191 to Supersede and Replace the Revised Pilot Submittal
Project stage: Other
NOC-AE-13003054, Supplement 1 to Revised STP Pilot Submittal for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolving Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191 to Supersede and Replace the Revised Pilot Submittal2013-11-21021 November 2013
Supplement 1 to Revised STP Pilot Submittal for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolving Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191 to Supersede and Replace the Revised Pilot Submittal
Project stage: Supplement
ML13330B2222013-12-0505 December 2013
Notice of Meeting with STP Nuclear Operating Company to Discuss Revised Pilot Submittal and Request for Exemptions for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191 at South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 (TAC MF2400-MF24
Project stage: Meeting
NOC-AE-13003065, Response to STP-GSI-191-EMCB-RAI-12013-12-23023 December 2013
Response to STP-GSI-191-EMCB-RAI-1
Project stage: Other
ML14015A3112013-12-23023 December 2013
Response to NRC Request for Reference Document for STP Risk-Informed GSI-191 Application
Project stage: Request
05000498/LER-2013-003, Regarding Unanalyzed Condition - Direct Current Ammeter Circuits Without Overcurrent Protection2013-12-23023 December 2013
Regarding Unanalyzed Condition - Direct Current Ammeter Circuits Without Overcurrent Protection
Project stage: Request
ML14015A3122013-12-23023 December 2013
Response to STP-GSI-191-EMCB-RAI-1
Project stage: Other
NOC-AE-13003070, Response to NRC Request for Reference Document for STP Risk-Informed GSI-191 Application2013-12-23023 December 2013
Response to NRC Request for Reference Document for STP Risk-Informed GSI-191 Application
Project stage: Request
ML13357A2662013-12-24024 December 2013
1/8/14 - Notice of Meeting with STP Nuclear Operating Co. to Discuss Revised Pilot Submittal and Request for Exemptions for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191 at South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2
Project stage: Meeting
ML14009A3072014-01-0909 January 2014
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - TACs MF2400 Through MF2409
Project stage: RAI
NOC-AE-13003057, Response to Request for Additional Information Re Use of RELAP5 in Analyses for Risk-Informed GSI-191 Licensing Application2014-01-0909 January 2014
Response to Request for Additional Information Re Use of RELAP5 in Analyses for Risk-Informed GSI-191 Licensing Application
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML14029A5332014-01-0909 January 2014
Response to Request for Additional Information Re Use of RELAP5 in Analyses for Risk-Informed GSI-191 Licensing Application
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML14015A0452014-01-14014 January 2014
NRR E-mail Capture - RAIs Regarding South Texas Projects Submittal for Risk-Informed Resolution of GS-191
Project stage: RAI
ML13358A0622014-01-14014 January 2014
Summary of 12/16/13 Meeting with STP Nuclear Operating Co. to Discuss Revised Pilot Submittal and Request for Exemptions for a Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191 at South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2
Project stage: Meeting
ML14052A0542014-02-13013 February 2014
STP-Specific Casa Grande Inputs CASA01 JT4, CASA09 JT4, CASA22 JT4, CASA26 JT4, & CASA43 JT4
Project stage: Request
ML14052A0532014-02-13013 February 2014
Submittal of Casa Grande Code & Analyses for Risk-Informed GSI-191 Licensing Application
Project stage: Other
ML14149A4352014-02-14014 February 2014
ALION-REP-STP-8998-02, Rev. 0, STP Casa Grande Analysis and LAR Enclosure 4-3 RAI Response, Enclosure 1 to Attachment 1
Project stage: Other
ML14072A0842014-02-18018 February 2014
CHLE-012, T1 Mbloca Test Report, Revision 4
Project stage: Request
ML14072A0792014-02-22022 February 2014
CHLE-020, Test Results for 10-Day Chemical Effects Test Simulating LBLOCA Condition (T5), Revision 3
Project stage: Request
ML14072A0852014-02-22022 February 2014
CHLE-014, T2 LBLOCA Test Report, Revision 3
Project stage: Request
ML14072A0822014-02-23023 February 2014
CHLE-008, Debris Bed Preparation & Formation Test Results, Revision 4
Project stage: Request
ML14072A0832014-02-24024 February 2014
CHLE-010, Chle Tank Test Results for Blended and NEI Fiber Beds with Aluminum Addition, Revision 3
Project stage: Request
2013-11-21
[Table View] |
Text
STPNOC RoverD: Risk over Deterministic GSI-191 Assessment 116 pages wj =
fj q
j fj
- j = 1, 2, (5.8a) j =wj NP
ÿ n=1 I
ÿ iœRn F(Dsmall i
),
(5.8b)
=
ÿ j
j.
(5.8c) 5.5 LERF frequency Because the STP RCFC are independent of the concerns raised in GSI-191, and because their design can remove decay and maintain contamination RCB limits within design, concerns raised in GSI-191 would not result in containment failure. The RCFC design allows for simpli"cation of LERF. That is, for the STP design, the change in early release frequency could be assumed directly proportional to the change in core damage frequency:
LERF = LERFMOR 3 CDF CDFMOR 4
(5.9)
Because all the scenarios in the risk-informed category are LLOCA, only the LLOCA frequency for LERF from the STP PRA model of record contributes to LERF in RoverD.
The LLOCA LERF for the arithmetic mean quanti"cation is 1.73E-10yr1. The geometric mean for LLOCA LERF is 3.1E-11yr1.
5.6 Results STP has two Cases (Case 1 and Case 2) other than the condition tested (AREVA, 2008) that are bounding for "ne "ber amounts. The tested deterministic case assumed two of the three STP ECCS strainers in operation (single failure criterion). Case 1 is the most likely case when all three strainers are in operation. In this case, far less "ber will accumulate on each strainer than for the tested case. Therefore, Case 1 is bounded by the tested case.
However, Case 2 corresponds to a case where only one train of the three STP ECCS strainers are in operation. Although this case is beyond design basis, it needs to be consid-ered in the risk analysis since at least twice as much "ber would accumulate on the single strainer than when two or more strainers are in operation. In this case, only 1/2 the tested amount of "ne "ber can be assumed to be tolerated.
Wednesday 15th April, 2015, 08:55 29 corresponding: keeej@stpegs.com
STPNOC RoverD: Risk over Deterministic GSI-191 Assessment 116 pages Table 5.2: Case 1 and Case 2 results for geometric (GM) and arithmetic (AM) aggregations of Tregoning et al. (2008, Tables 7.11 and 7.19) data. Frequencies are in events/yr. Also shown are the results for a DEGB-only model for the locations that go to failure.
Continuum Break Model Quantile Case 1 GM Case 1 AM Case 2 GM Case 2 AM (GM)
(AM) 5th 2.64E-10 6.47E-09 3.68E-09 2.36E-08 3.08E-10 6.69E-09 50th 7.50E-09 1.68E-07 8.30E-08 4.92E-07 8.47E-09 1.72E-07 95th 3.43E-07 4.79E-06 1.81E-06 1.24E-05 3.62E-07 4.89E-06 Mean 1.17E-07 1.56E-06 5.10E-07 3.93E-06 1.22E-07 1.59E-06 DEGB-Only Model 5th 9.83E-11 8.18E-09 1.14E-09 1.66E-08 1.12E-10 8.29E-09 50th 2.86E-09 2.07E-07 2.64E-08 3.90E-07 3.16E-09 2.09E-07 95th 1.47E-07 7.06E-06 6.85E-07 1.21E-05 1.54E-07 7.13E-06 Mean 5.12E-08 2.06E-06 2.03E-07 3.61E-06 5.32E-08 2.08E-06 Table 5.3: LERF evaluation for geometric and arithmetic means of the Continuum and DEG-only models.
Model LERF using (GM)
LERF using (AM)
Contiuum break model 4.11E-13 2.99E-11 DEGB-only model 1.79E-13 3.91E-11 5.7 CDF results When all cases are considered using (5.8), a slightly higher CDF is estimated than when only one strainer is in operation. Table 5.2 summarizes the CDF estimate for geometric and arithmetic averages from Tregoning et al. (2008). The frequencies for the bounding cases are f2 = 3.32E 6yr1 (Case 1) and f1 = 4.34E 8yr1 (Case 2). As shown, the median CDF is within Region III of the Regulatory Guide 1.174 evaluation ( 1.0E06).
Interpolation of Table 5.1 is done using the linear-linear method, (5.2).
As shown in Table 5.2, only the mean and 95th percentile of the arithmetic mean estimate exceed the Region III criterion in (NRC, 2011). As described in the letter to the NRC dated May 22, 2014 (ML14149A434), the geometric method of aggregation is the most appropriate estimator of LOCA frequency from (Tregoning et al., 2008).
5.8 LERF results Using (5.9), LERF values were calculated using CDF for geometric and arithmetic means using baseline CDF. LERF values for geometric and arithmetic quanti"cations for LLOCA were used for the baseline LERF values. The results are summarized in Table 5.3.
Wednesday 15th April, 2015, 08:55 30 corresponding: keeej@stpegs.com
