ML22214A097

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Presentation by South Texas Project
ML22214A097
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 08/02/2022
From: Brost W
South Texas
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Tyree, Christopher
Shared Package
ML22214A095 List:
References
Download: ML22214A097 (6)


Text

Risk-Informing License Renewal -

Other Possibilities and Continued Discussion Wendy Brost, Licensing Supervisor STP Nuclear Operating Company

Recap of RIC Presentation & Background

  • STP was proof-of-concept pilot for risk significance categorization, 50.69 predecessor
  • STP has categorized over 100 plant systems in terms of nuclear safety risk (GQA) and plant generation risk (PGR)
  • Component risk categorization provides a technical basis for treatment of components commensurate with their safety and operational significance
  • STP plans to apply alternative treatment for GQA Low and Non-Risk Significant components (RISC-3 and RISC-4),

engineering evaluations would be performed for RISC-2 components

  • Each AMP will be evaluated for risk-informed potential

Goals and Benefits

  • Goal: apply the appropriate resources to components commensurate with their nuclear safety significance
  • Benefits:
  • Focus resources on items with the most safety significant components
  • Increased availability of SSCs due to removal of prescriptive special treatment requirements in lieu of adequate and more efficient alternative treatments and a reduction in outage time during the performance of AMP requirements
  • Improved ALARA performance
  • Reduced station burden for AMPs

Next Actions - Preparing for the Change

  • Creating procedure for performing AMP evaluations
  • Guidance for tracking, implementation, and documentation of alternate treatment actions and activities
  • Ensures industry and station OE pertaining to age-related degradation reviewed and factored into evaluations
  • Guidance and responsibilities for AMP-specific alternate treatment implementation and maintenance

Next Actions - Preparing for the Change

  • Documented position in internal white paper
  • Comparative evaluation assessing applicability of the STP exemption from special treatment requirements to risk-informing aging management programs

Conclusion:

STP can risk-inform procedures and processes to implement Exemption allowances for all station programs, as applicable and appropriate.

Other Potential Applications and Issues

  • Lack of exact/specific guidance or clear precedence - justifiable, but different
  • Want to be transparent in our actions - what is the appropriate vehicle for communicating this change?
  • 50.59 evaluation - would be subject to inspection, reported in biennial update
  • Future discussion in public forum?