|
|---|
Category:Meeting Summary
MONTHYEARML23268A4072023-09-27027 September 2023
Summary of September 19, 2023, Closed Public Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company Regarding Alternative Security Measures for Early Warning System License Amendment Request for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML23265A1902023-09-26026 September 2023
Meeting Summary: September 13, 2023 Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 License Renewal Application Pre-Application Meeting
ML23143A2262023-06-0101 June 2023
May 3, 2023, Summary of Public Meeting to Discuss the End of Cycle Assessment and Pre-Submittal License Renewal Process Overview for Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML22272A5072022-09-29029 September 2022
Summary of September 27, 2022, Closed Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company Regarding Planned Security Plan Changes for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML22147A0932022-06-0606 June 2022
2021 Annual Assessment Public Meeting Summary
ML22126A0162022-05-0909 May 2022
Summary of April 27, 2022, Closed Teleconference with Pacific Gas and Electric Company Regarding Alternative Security Measures for Early Warning System License Amendment Request for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML21246A0202021-09-0808 September 2021
Summary of August 30, 2021, Pre-Submittal Teleconference with Pacific Gas and Electric Company Regarding a Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan License Amendment Request for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML21140A3892021-05-24024 May 2021
Riv Column 1 EOC 2020 Public Meeting Summary
ML20332A1802020-12-0101 December 2020
Summary of November 24, 2020, Pre-Submittal Teleconference with Pacific Gas and Electric Company a Permanently Defueled Technical Specification License Amendment Request
ML20231A6522020-08-24024 August 2020
Summary of Teleconference with Pacific Gas & Electric Company Regarding an Exigent Amendment Request to Modify Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 & 2, Technical Specification 3.7.5, Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System EPID L-2020-LLA-017
ML20189A2832020-07-0707 July 2020
Summary of Region IV Annual Assessment Public Meeting
ML19318F5272019-11-15015 November 2019
Summary of the August 27, 2019, Public Meeting Near the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Regarding the Establishment and Operation of Community Advisory Boards
ML19196A0742019-07-22022 July 2019
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company Regarding Forthcoming Activities Associated with Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Planned Decommissioning
ML19064B2652019-03-14014 March 2019
Summary of February 28, 2019, Public Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss the Proposed Relief Request Concerning Reactor Vessel Internal Visual Examination for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 & 2
ML18348A4202018-12-31031 December 2018
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas & Electric Co. to Discuss Exemption Request to Withdraw Funds from the Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts to Fund Decommissioning Planning Activities at Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant
ML18207A7332018-08-10010 August 2018
Summary of Pre-Licensing Meeting with PG&E Co. to Discuss the Proposed LAR to Implement WCAP-16996-A, Revision 1, Realistic LOCA Evaluation Methodology Applied to the Full Spectrum of Break Sizes at Diablo Canyon
ML17198A6032017-07-17017 July 2017
Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting Regarding Diablo Canyon Power Plant 2016 Performance
ML16190A1782016-07-0808 July 2016
Summary of Annual Assessment Town Hall Meeting and Public Outreach Regarding Diablo Canyon Power Plant 2015 Performance
ML16011A2042016-01-14014 January 2016
Summary of Conference Call on January 7, 2016, Between the U.S. NRC and Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Concerning the Responses to RAI for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (CAC Nos. MF401
ML15343A1272015-12-24024 December 2015
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric to Discuss Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 Amendment Request to Revise UFSAR for Beacon Power Distribution Monitoring System Methodology and TS 5.6.5 (COLR) Paragon and Nexus Methodologies
ML15348A1702015-12-17017 December 2015
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Concerning the RAI Responses Pertaining to the Diablo Canyon Power Plant LRA Environmental Review
ML15280A2842015-10-20020 October 2015
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas & Electric to Discuss Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association NFPA 805, Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for LWR Generating Plants (2001 Edition),
ML15279A4222015-10-0909 October 2015
Summary of 8/25/15 Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric to Discuss Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 Amendment Request to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times, TSTF-505, Revision 1, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times-RITSTF Initiati
ML15275A0942015-10-0707 October 2015
Summary of the Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Site Audit Related to the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License Renewal Review
ML15275A1302015-10-0707 October 2015
Summary of the Site Audit Related to the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License Renewal Environmental Review
ML15233A0062015-09-10010 September 2015
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML15233A0052015-09-0909 September 2015
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric to Discuss Diablo Canyon, Units 1 & 2 License Amendment Request to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times, TSTF-505, Revision 1, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times-RITSTF. Initiati
ML15233A4912015-09-0101 September 2015
August 5, 2015, Public Scoping Meetings for the Environmental Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License Renewal Application
ML15209A9442015-07-28028 July 2015
June 24, 2015, Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric and Public Open House Regarding Diablo Canyon Power Plant 2014 Performance
ML15125A1862015-05-27027 May 2015
April 28, 2015, Summary of Category 1 Public Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Diablo Canyon'S Seismic Hazard Reevaluation Associated with Implementation of Japan Lessons-Learned Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.
ML15134A2572015-05-18018 May 2015
5/7/15 Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML15092A0792015-04-16016 April 2015
July 14-17, 2014 - Summary of Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2, Audit to Adopt National Fire Protection Association NFPA 805, Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for LWR Generating Plants (2001 Edition)
ML15069A0952015-03-24024 March 2015
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on March 4, 2015 Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Concerning the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application
ML15043A1992015-02-19019 February 2015
2/3/2015 Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Regarding Presubmittal Discussion on Alternate Source Term License Amendment Request for Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML15037A2482015-02-0505 February 2015
Summary of Regulatory Conference to Discuss Safety Significance of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Protective Action Recommendations for Areas of the Ocean Finding
ML14350A2712014-12-22022 December 2014
Summary of 12/11/14 Preapplication Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss License Amendment Request to Support Installation of 500 Kilovolt Output Generator Breakers at Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2
ML14029A4502014-12-10010 December 2014
Summary of 12/18/13 Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML14295A7332014-11-17017 November 2014
9/24/14 Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML14197A3522014-07-22022 July 2014
7/9/14 Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML14157A0912014-06-17017 June 2014
Summary of 5/21/14 Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML14155A3742014-06-0404 June 2014
May 22, 2014, Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Regarding Diablo Canyon Power Plant 2013 Performance
ML14113A4932014-05-0606 May 2014
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML14113A4222014-04-23023 April 2014
Public Meeting with Pacific Gas & Electric (Pg&E)To Discuss the Operating Performance for Diablo Canyon Power Plant for the Period January 1 - December 31, 2013
ML13329A4172013-12-30030 December 2013
Summary of Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML13354C0912013-12-23023 December 2013
Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting with Pacific Gas & Electric Re Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant 2012 Performance
ML13282A3822013-11-0707 November 2013
10/2/2013 Summary of Pre-Application Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Upcoming Structural Weld Overlay Relief Request to Use an Alternative to Disposition Detected Laminar Indications at Diablo Canyon, Unit 2
ML13269A0042013-10-0808 October 2013
9/24/13 Summary of Pre-Application Meeting to Discuss License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.8.1 Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirements at Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2
ML13270A2922013-10-0202 October 2013
Summary of 9/26/13 Meeting to Discuss Amendment Request to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force TSTF-505, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times, RITSTF Initiative 4B at Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2
ML13269A0072013-10-0101 October 2013
Summary of 9/25/13 Pre-Application Meeting to Discuss Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluations for License Amendment Request at Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2
ML13266A0882013-09-30030 September 2013
9/18/13 - Summary of Closed Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Digital Replacement of Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
2023-09-27
[Table view]
Category:Conference/Symposium/Workshop Paper
MONTHYEARML23079A0452023-03-16016 March 2023
RIC 2023 Slides - Maureen Zawalick TH19
ML17024A3762017-01-10010 January 2017
Abstract Slip Rate of the Hosgri Fault Gs
ML12157A2722012-06-11011 June 2012
5/31/2012 Summary of Telephone Conference with Licensees Regarding Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Reevaluations - Diablo Canyon, 1 and 2, San Onofre, Units 2 and 3, Columbia Generating Station, and Palo Verde, Units 1, 2, a
ML1103800452011-04-12012 April 2011
January 4, 2011, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and PG&E Regarding the Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis for the Proposed License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML1104607182011-02-18018 February 2011
January 25, 2011, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and PG&E Concerning Open Items Related to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, SER (TAC Nos. ME2896 & 2897)
ML1035603212011-01-10010 January 2011
12/8/10 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Btw the USNRC and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Concerning Requests for Additional Information Response Related to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Ap
ML1034904172011-01-10010 January 2011
12/1/10 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Btw the USNRC and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information Related to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, LRA
ML1024507552010-09-29029 September 2010
08/31/2010-Summary of Telephone Conference Call Between NRC and Pacific Gas & Electric Company Concerning Responses to Request for Additional Information Related to the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 & 2, License Renewal Application
ML1023900932010-09-15015 September 2010
8/18/10, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between the USNRC and PG&E Concerning Responses to Requests for Additional Information Related to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application
ML1023105262010-08-27027 August 2010
8/17/10 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between the NRC and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Concerning D-RAI Related to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, LRA - Metal Fatigue
ML1023203792010-08-20020 August 2010
09/09/10 Notice of Public Meeting to Discuss Seismic Hazard and Its Applications for the Safe Operation of Commercial Nuclear Plants, Including Specific Discussions of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant
ML0818405342008-06-20020 June 2008
06 - 06/20/2008 NFPA-805 Workshop Handouts - Change Evaluation for Non-Pilot Diablo Canyon
ML0720004052007-05-14014 May 2007
Ssg Tube Inspection Discussion Points Prepared by the Office of NRR for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Generating Station
2023-03-16
[Table view] |
Text
,:,v'-~",!I REGlil-9~ UNITED STATES
- ""~"* 011... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~ g WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
... .' s:
- . '/+'} ., ""i"~
April 12, 2011
- il LICENSEE: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
FACILITY: Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JANUARY 4, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY REGARDING THE SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL OF DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) staff held a telephone conference call on January 4, 2011, to allow NRC staff an opportunity to clarify its understanding of several responses PG&E provided in its December 6, 2010 RAI response letter (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession Number (ADAMS) ML103410090). PG&E provided a formal response to this teleconference on February 4, 2011 (ADAMS Accession Number ML110380250).
Enclosure 1 provides a participant list and Enclosure 2 provides a teleconference summary.
The applicant has had an opportunity to review this summary.
a~t3~
-fo("
Andrew L. Stuyvenberg, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JANUARY 4, 2011 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Dan Gibbons Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E)
Terry Grebel PG&E John Pyo PG&E John Macleod ERIN Engineering & Research (ERIN)
Dave Bidwell ERIN Grant Teagarden ERIN Ray Gallucci U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Andrew Stuyvenberg NRC Bob Schmidt Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
Steve Short PNNL ENCLOSURE 1
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL JANUARY 4, 2011 1:00pm EST The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff received Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) response to follow-up RAls on December 8, 2010 (letter dated December 6). After reviewing PG&E's responses, NRC staff requested a conference call to confirm the staff's understanding of the responses before moving forward on the staff's SAMA review. NRC staff provided six informational requests to PG&E via e-mail on December 16, 2010.
The teleconference focused on the December 16 requests. These items are listed below, along with the explanations provided by PG&E during the conference call. All items were resolved during the call, though PG&E will submit to NRC a formal, written version of its response to request number 3.
- 1. The responses to a number of RAls state that the DC01 B model includes or does certain things or gives certain results. Presumably these statements are also true for the DC01 A model since the only difference between the two models is the seismic hazard curve.
PG&E indicated that the only difference between DC01 A and DC01 B is the seismic hazard curve. The statement is true for both models.
- 2. The response to RAI 4 (or RAI 1.i) mentions that the DCOO (stage 1) model was modified to take credit for RCS depressurization following loss of charging in the seismic PRA and this resulted in a reduction in total CDF to 5.05E-5 per year. Was this change incorporated in the DCCO model? The results for DCCO do not show such a significant decrease in CDF.
PG&E indicated that it addressed this issue in its December 6 RAI response, beginning at the bottom of page 4. Excluding the Cable Spreading Room and Control Room fires reduced the DCOO CDF to 5.26E-5 per year, while taking credit for RCS depressurization following loss of charging accounted for the remainder of the reduction to 5.05E-5 per year. In the DCCO model results shown on page 5 (total CDF: 5.38E-5), fires are once again included.
- 3. RAI 8 (or RAI 2.e and 2.d). The RAI response does not support the conclusion that the higher cesium (Cs) release fraction for RC16U than for RC14 "would not be expected to impact the consequences by a significant amount." Consider that the RC16U1RC14 Cs release fraction ratio, derived from information provided in ER Table F.2-8, is 2.9 (4.3E-02/1.5E-02) for the MAAP3 results and 1.7 (8.9E-02/5.1 E-02) for the ZISOR results, while the release frequency ratio, derived from information provided in the response to RAI 2.b, is 0.7 (5.98E-07/8.55E-07). The NRC staff performed an analysis that scaled the population dose-risk and OECR for the ST2 release category by the MAAP3 ratio.
ENCLOSURE 2
-2 The NRC staff's analysis showed that SAMA 3, and potentially SAMAs 10 and 18, were potentially cost-beneficial, in addition to the SAMAs previously determined by PG&E to be cost-beneficial. Provide further justification for the conclusion in the RAI 8 response that the difference in the Cs release fractions for RC16U and RC14 would not impact the results of the SAMA analysis.
PG&E will submit a written response to this question to provide the NRC with formal documentation. The following is the NRC staff synopsis of the teleconference discussion.
Diablo Canyon staff indicated that the SAMAs in question are not cost-beneficial, even when analyzed with the RC16U source term. PG&E noted that Table F.2-8 of the ER is a reproduction from the DCPP IPE, and is not SAMA-related. Instead, PG&E used MAAP4.0.7 for the RC16U source term in ST2. PG&E noted that cesium iodide (Csl) is an important contributor with impacts on costs, but costs are not directly proportional to Cs releases. Relying purely on Cs release would, PG&E asserts, overstate the impact of a given release.
The initial issue with RC14 is that, for estimating purposes, using one-third of the source term shown in Table F.2-8 results in an underestimate. PG&E's other option was to calculate the source term using two-thirds of that for RC14, which would result in an overestimate. PG&E noted that using either RC16U or RC14, even with values set at 95%, still results in the cost-benefit balance of the SAMAs in question being negative (not cost-beneficial).
In RC16U, PG&E developed a specific source term to account for a lower pressure core melt.
This modified source term changes the cost-benefit analysis for SAM A 3, though it remains, PG&E asserts, non-cost-beneficial. In general, PG&E asserts that the source-term differences have a minimal effect on results. The primary difference is that, due to MACCS modeling assumptions, the higher RC16U source term affects how local populations would respond to the event. Given larger emergency-phase doses, more people would evacuate. This would lower the early-phase dose to population. In the base-case analysis, doses were driven by those received in the emergency phase. In the RC16U case, long-term doses drive the results.
PG&E noted that the Csi impact was a factor of 8 larger under RC16U assumptions (4% release versus 0.5% release).
- 4. The response to RAI 10 (or RAI 2.j) discusses some mitigation actions called for in the SAMGs. To what extent are the SAMGs incorporated into the DCPP Level 2 model?
PG&E indicated that no SAMG actions are included in Level 2.
- 5. RAI 11 (or RAi 3.c). SAMAs 5 and 18 are described as identical except that the alternate EDG is seismically qualified in SAMA 18. How does split fraction TD2 differ from TD1 and TDF?
- 3 Split fraction TD1 includes random failure of EDG with all external support available. TD2 introduces the unavailability of instrument A power. TDF includes total failure of all supporting systems.
- 6. RAI 12 (or RAI 3.d). Are AFW seismic failures in the sequence therefore failures or unavailabilities of the AFW water sources?
PG&E noted that, as seismic events are likely to result in a loss of offsite power. the reactor would have to rely on natural circulation for cooling. The volume of the condensate-storage tank (below a non-seismically-qualified nozzle) is insufficient for cooling, so fire-water systems would have to be aligned - by operator actions - with the cooling system. PG&E attempted to account for the fact that operators, in an emergency, may fail to align the fire-water system to the cooling system.
April 12, 2011 LICENSEE: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
FACILITY: Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JANUARY 4, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY REGARDING THE SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL OF DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) staff held a telephone conference call on January 4, 2011, to allow NRC staff an opportunity to clarify its understanding of several responses PG&E provided in its December 6, 2010 RAI response letter (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession Number (ADAMS) ML103410090). PG&E provided a formal response to this teleconference on February 4, 2011 (ADAMS Accession Number ML110380250).
Enclosure 1 provides a participant list and Enclosure 2 provides a teleconference summary.
The applicant has had an opportunity to review this summary.
IRA! by Briana A. Balsam for Andrew L. Stuyvenberg, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
See next page ADAMS Accession Number: ML110380045 OFFICE LA: DLRlRPOB* PM:DLRlRPB2 BC:DLR/RPB2 PM:DLRlRPB2 NAME SFigueroa AStuyvenberg DWrona AStuyvenberg (BBalsam for)
DATE 02/07/2011 03/21/2011 03/30/2011 04/12/2011 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Memorandum to Pacific Gas & Electric Company from A. Stuyvenberg dated April 12, 2011
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JANUARY 4, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY REGARDING THE SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL OF DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
DLR RtF E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource DWrona LUselding, OPA NFerrer JWeil,OCA AStuyvenberg WMaier, RIV AWang RRihm, EDO MPeck, RIV EWilliamson, OGC GMiller, RIV NO'Keefe, RIV SUttal,OGC LSubin,OGC MSmith,OGC ICouret, OPA VDricks,OPA
