ML16011A204

Summary of Conference Call on January 7, 2016, Between the U.S. NRC and Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Concerning the Responses to RAI for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application

ML16011A204
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	01/14/2016
From:	Michael Wentzel Division of License Renewal
To:
Michael Wentzel 415-6459
References
CAC MF4019, CAC MF4020, FOIA/PA-2016-0438
Download: ML16011A204 (5)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 14, 2016 LICENSEE:

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

FACILITY:

Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JANUARY 7, 2016, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. CONCERNING THE RESPONSES TO A REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (CAC NOS. MF4019 AND MF4020)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representatives of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) held a telephone conference call on January 7, 2016, to discuss and clarify the PG&Es December 4, 2015, responses to the NRC staffs request for additional information concerning the environmental review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application.

provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the responses discussed with PG&E, including a brief description of the status.

PG&E had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

/RA/

Michael Wentzel, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/encl: Listserv

ML16011A204

• concurrence via email OFFICE LA:DLR*

PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IBetts MWentzel JDanna MWentzel DATE 1/14/16 1/14/16 1/14/16 1/14/16

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JANUARY 7, 2016, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. CONCERNING THE RESPONSES TO A REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (CAC NOS. MF4019 AND MF4020)

DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrDraArcb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource RidsNrrPMDiabloCanyon Resource MWentzel JDanna RPlasse KFolk NMartinez SLingam CKanatas, OGC JLindell, OGC THipschman, SRI JReynoso, RI JGroom, RIV DMcIntyre, OPA LUselding, OPA WMaier, RIV AMoreno, OCA

ENCLOSURE 1 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JANUARY 7, 2016 PARTICIPANTS ORGANIZATION Kevin Folk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Nancy Martinez NRC Michael Wentzel NRC Bryan Cunningham Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E)

Terry Grebel PG&E Michelle Olsofsky PG&E Philippe Soenen PG&E

ENCLOSURE 2 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL CONCERNING THE RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES REVIEW OF THE DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION JANUARY 7, 2016 By letter dated November 5, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff issued a request for additional information (RAI) to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) related to the environmental review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 (DCPP), license renewal application. By letter dated December 4, 2015, PG&E submitted responses to the NRC staff RAIs. On January 7, 2016, the NRC staff and representatives of PG&E held a telephone conference call to discuss and clarify the following RAI responses.

Response to RAI-AIR-5(c).

Discussion: The NRC staff requested PG&E clarify whether there is a greenhouse gas emissions reduction program implemented specifically at DCPP. PG&E stated that it would provide an amended response to the RAI to provide the necessary clarification.

Response to RAI-SWR-1.

Discussion: The NRC staff requested that PG&E clarify how total surface water withdrawals at DCPP could be determined using the spreadsheets that were provided in response to this RAI.

PG&E stated that it would provide an amended response to the RAI to provide the necessary clarification.

Response to RAI-SWR-10.

Discussion: The NRC staff requested that PG&E resolve the apparent discrepancy between this RAI response, which states that the DCPP desalination facility is licensed to produce 1.5 million gallons per day (gpd) and Section 3.1.2 of the environmental report, which states that the desalination facility has the capacity to produce 450 gallons per minute (648,000 gpd).

PG&E stated that it would provide an amended response to the RAI to provide the necessary clarification.