|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022 Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021 E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021 E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent) ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021 E-mail from HDI: RAI Response ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021 State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response) ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021 Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021 E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021 Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020 E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020 Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020 Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020 Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0 ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019 for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019 NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019 Transaction ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019 Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club) ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019 NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019 Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019 Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019 State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019 E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002 ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019 NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation 2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
'1 Sarah Rich, From: Michael Modes Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:31 PM To: John Richmond
Subject:
" RE: ALERT - Preliminary Results of OC Data Review - ALERT From: John Richmond Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:04 PM To: Michael Modes Cc: Richard Conte
Subject:
RE: ALERT - Preliminary Results of OC Data Review - ALERT Michael, nicely stated. Just a couple of questions.
Did you review all 3 Tech Evals, or only focus on the one eval for the 19 arrays?
-- I focused on the 19 arrays since the other evaluations are substantially less important.
They have one more Tech Eval to finish. Will you be able to review it tomorrow, with a short turnaround time?
-- Yes.
Should we have any follow-up on the apparent differences between their MathCad method vs your Excel method?
-- No.
Were th.ir values of Skewness & Kurtosis reasonable?
-- Ye1Dut it should be noted that in one case they exceeded the limits they established as a' matter of engineering judgrn-dht. I did a sensitivity analysis (took out the skewing data numbers, one-at-a-time) and found the result still higher then the min. wall. and the calculation insensitive to the margin Thanks so much for the help.
From: Michael Modes Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:33 PM To: Richard Conte Cc: John Richmond
Subject:
RE: ALERT - Preliminary Results of OC Data Review - ALERT John pointed me to the full evaluation in the licensing database used by Amergen @ Oyster Creek.
(b)(5)
In the process however I have given the Amergen data a very thorough scrub and have found nothing questionable with the data or the calculations.
Ibh In ftia record was 0uM w FOPA '1--06
B-ed I my review, and understanding of the criteria applied, I conclude the drywell will continue to meet it's design basis and accident basis functions until the next planned outage.
From: Richard Conte Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 12:30 PM To: Michael Modes Cc: John Richmond
Subject:
RE: ALERT - Preliminary Results of OC Data Review - ALERT sounds like we need to get them on the horn and explain our concern and ask for a response somehow.
we obviously can't go into this startup with this uncertainty.
Richard J. Conte Chief, Engineering Branch No. 1, DRS, Reg. I L (b)(6) I Off 610-337-5183
[ The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written consent from the sender. This e-mail may also contain confidential or privileged information so consult with the sender before disclosing. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.]
From: Michael Modes Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:15 AM To: Richard Conte Cc: John Richmond
Subject:
ALERT - Preliminary Results of OC Data Review - ALERT (b)(5) 2
. . V Received: from R1CLSTR01.nrc.gov ([148. 184.99.71) by RlMSOl.nrc.gov
([148.184.99.10]) with mapi; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:36:01 -0500 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Michael Modes <MichaeI.Modes@nrc.gov>
To: John Richmond <John. Richmond@nrc.gov>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:31:15 -0500
Subject:
RE: ALERT - Preliminary Results of OC Data Review - ALERT Thread-Topic: ALERT - Preliminary Results of OC Data Review - ALERT Thread-Index:
AQHJRaspScaR4YBtVEChhrKXmbh3947431 QwgABBm LyAABIColAAGxa5 Message-ID:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA5461ABOF@R1 CLSTR01.nrc.gov>
References:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA5461AB02@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<285 6BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA544C52AD@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA5461ABOE@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>, <285 6BC46 F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA547F5828@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
In-Reply-To:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA547F5828@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<2856 BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA5461ABOF@R1 CLSTROI.nrc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0