IR 05000416/2006009

IR 05000416-06-009 and 07200050-06-001, Conducted on 03/21-24/2006, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

ML061000731
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	04/10/2006
From:	Spitzberg B NRC/RGN-IV/DNMS/FCDB
To:	Gerald Williams Entergy Operations
References
IR-06-001
Download: ML061000731 (29)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY C O M M I S S I O N

REGION IV

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400

SUBJECT:

INSPECTION REPORT 050-00416/06-009; 072-00050/06-001

Dear Mr. Williams,

On March 21-24, 2006, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission observed pre-operational testing of dry fuel storage canister welding and weld testing at the Grand Gulf station. The inspection included direct observation of the welding and weld testing operations, review of selected records and procedures, and interviews with personnel. The enclosed inspection report documents the results of the inspection which were discussed with you and members of your staff on March 24, 2006. The inspection determined that your personnel, processes and equipment were adequate to perform the spent fuel canister closure welds required by the Holtec Certificate of Compliance and Final Safety Analysis Report. The welding and weld testing personnel were qualified, the work plans and procedures were comprehensive and functional, and the equipment was reliable. No violations were identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure(s), and your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.aov/readinq-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the Public without redaction.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact the undersigned at (817) 860-8191 or Mr. Scott Atwater at (817) 860-8286.

Sincerely, D. Blair Spitzberg, Ph.D., Chief Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Docket Nos.: 50-416 / 72-050 License No.: NPF-29

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report 050-00416/06-009; 072-00050/06-001

Entergy Operations, Inc. -2-

REGION IV==

Docket Nos.: 050-00416; 072-00050 License No.: NPF-29 Report No: 050-00416/06-009; 072-00050/06-001 Licensee: Entergy Operations, Inc.

Facility: Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150 Dates: March 21-24,2006 Inspector: S.P. Atwater, Health Physicist Accompanied By: W. E. Bezanson, ATL (Contractor)

Approved By: D.B. Spitzberg, Ph.D., Chief Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Attachments: 1. Supplemental Information 2. Inspector Notes

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Grand Gulf Nuclear Station NRC Inspection Report 050-00416/06-009; 072-00050/06-001 Grand Gulf commenced their Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)

pre-operational testing program on March 21, 2006 with a dry run exercise of spent fuel canister closure welding, weld testing, and canister lid weld removal.

Condition 10.f of Certificate of Compliance (CoC) 72-1014 required the licensee to perform a dry run exercise of canister welding and weld testing of the dry fuel canister closure welds. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) observed this segment of the dry run exercise and determined that the canister welding and weld testing requirements of Condition 10.f had been met. Condition 1O.k of CoC 72-1014 required the licensee to demonstrate removing canister lid welds. The weld cutting operation was performed on March 27-28, 2006 and was not observed by the NRC. Subsequent to the inspection, the inspectors reviewed the videotape and lid cutting documentation and determined that the lid weld removal requirement of Condition 10.k had been met.

The following is a summary of the observations made during this inspection. Details related to the activities observed are provided in Attachment 2 to this report.

The As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) practices simulated during this demonstration were adequate for cask welding and cutting operations. Pre-Job briefings, area postings, exposure limits, expected dose rates, alarming dosimeter setpoints, low dose rate areas, and adherence to the Radiation Work Permit were demonstrated to the maximum extent practical. A Foreign Materials Exclusion (FME)

zone was established around the canister and an FME monitor was posted at the entrance to the cask area. A tool and material control log was used and the mock-up area was maintained clean during the demonstration (Attachment 2, ALARA).

The Grand Gulf dry run exercise conducted from March 21-28, 2006 satisfied the Certificate of Compliance requirements for canister welding, weld testing and lid weld removal (Attachment 2, Dry Run Exercise).

Welding Services, Inc. (WSI) provided the Non-Destructive Examination (NDE)

inspector for the demonstration. The inspectors certification records were complete and documented that he had met the experience, training and visual acuity requirements for performing non destructive testing on the spent fuel canister closure welds.

(Attachment 2, NDE Personnel Quals).

The liquid penetrant and visual testing procedures were validated and qualified and contained the acceptance criteria and minimum procedure elements required by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code (Attachment 2, NDE Procedures - PT and VT).

Helium leak testing was performed on the canister vent and drain port cover plate welds in accordance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard N14.5.

The helium leak testing equipment met the minimum requirement for sensitivity and was calibrated to a traceable standard (Attachment 2, NDE Testing - MSLT).

e Liquid penetrant examinations were performed on all closure welds. The surfaces to be examined were cleaned thoroughly and all chemicals were free of contaminants.

Excess penetrant was removed properly and final interpretation was made within the required time frames. The associated visual testing was performed using the correct eye position. Lighting intensity for both liquid penetrant and visual testing exceeded the minimum requirements (Attachment 2, NDE Testing - PT).

e The chemical composition of the weld wire spool and cut lengths used during the demonstration was consistent with the requirements of the ASME code (Attachment 2, Welding Materials).

0 Welding Services, Inc. (WSI) provided the welders and welding operators for the demonstration. The WSI welding personnel were qualified in both manual and machine Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) in accordance with the ASME code. The licensee had reviewed the welding personnel qualification records supplied by WSI and had approved them (Attachment 2, Welding Personnel Quals).

0 The welding procedures for manual and machine GTAW contained the essential, non-essential and supplementary essential variables required by ASME Code Section IX, and had been properly qualified for use. The space under the lid was sampled for combustibles gases during all welding and grinding operations, up to completion of the lid to shell weld root pass and successful liquid penetrant examination. Tack welds were prepared as needed for incorporation into the final weld. Weld repairs were made in accordance with the ASME code and all welds types were consistent with the Holtec drawings (Attachment 2, Welding Procedures).

e Inspection Follow-Up Item 72-050/0501 was opened in Inspection Report 72-050/05-01 dated August 16, 2005 and was closed during this inspection. The 28 day compressive strength testing was completed on August 19, 2005 and the results were satisfactory (Attachment 2, W rap-Up/Close-Out).

-4-ATTACHMENT 1 Supplemental Information PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee Personnel R. Benson - Radiation Protection Supervisor M. Bonds - Quality Assurance R. Clemens - Radiation Protection Supervisor M. Cross - EP&C Supervisor D. Hall - Radiation Protection Supervisor M. Langston - Quality Control D. Ellis - Senior Project Manager B. Lee - EP&C Supervisor M. Locke - Engineering Projects D. Magee - Dry Fuel Services Supervisor S. Martin - Engineering Projects Manager M. Meister - Quality Control J. Owens - NSA Licensing J. Snyder - Quality Control B. Warren - Senior Staff Engineering D. Watt - Site Welding Superintendent D. Wiles - Engineering Director Vice President Operations R. Wilson - Radiation Protection Manager Vendor Personnel C. Deady - WSI Welding Supervisor B. Chapman - Welder and Welding Operator D. Hawkins - Welder and Welding Operator R. Leimenstoll - NDE level Ill W. South - Welder and Welding Operator INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 60854.1 Pre-Operational Testing of ISFSls at Operating Plants 92701 Follow-Up

-5-LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED Opened None Closed 72-050/05-01 IF1 Completion of ISFSI pad 28-day strength testing Discussed None LIST OF ACRONYMS USED ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable ANSI American National Standards Institute ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers COC Certificate of Compliance FME Foreign Materials Exclusion FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report GTAW Gas Tungsten Arc Welding HMSLD Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility MSLT Mass Spectrometer Leak Testing NDE Non-Destructive Examination NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PQR Procedure Qualification Record PT Liquid Penetrant Testing RWP Radiation Work Permit SNT-TC-1A American Society for Non-Destructive Testing - Technical Council - 1A VT Visual Testing WOPQ Welding Operator Performance Qualification W PQ Welder Performance Qualification w PS Welding Procedure Specification WSI Welding Services Inc.

Attachment 2 G LDING DEM Inspector Notes Category: ALARA Topic: Pre-Job Briefings Refereme: FSAR 1014, Sect 10.1.1 Requirement Pre-job ALARA briefings should be held with workers and radiological protection personnel prior to work on or around tlie system.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Pre-job briefings, area postings, exposure limits, expected dose rates, alarming dosimeter setpoints, low dose waiting areas, and adherence to tlie Radiation Work Permit were demonstrated to the maximum extent practical. The concept of ALARA was emphasized throughout tlie demonstration.

An FME zone was established around the canister until it was sealed. FME boundary signs were posted on the outside surface of the transfer cask. An FME monitor was posted at the entrance to the cask area and a Tool and Material Control Log was maintained. Cleanliness and good housekeeping practices were maintained during the demonstration.

Documents Radiation Work Pennit (RWP) 2006-2001, MPC Lid Installation and Removal, Reviewed: ~ ~0 ~ i ~ i ~ ~

Procedure 01-S-07-44, Revision 7, Attachment III, Tools and Material Control Log Category: Drv RUIIExercise Topic:

ref em^^: CoC 1014, Condition 1O.f Requirement A dry run exercise of canister closure shall be conducted by the licensee prior to the first use of tlie system to load spent fiiel assemblies.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Tlie dry run exercise of canister closure was conducted on March 22-24,2006 in the Rotor Storage Building at the Grand Gulf Station. The dry run exercise used a canister and transfer cask inoclcup and was controlled under Work Order 745 12, Procedure 20-S-01-135, Weld Traveler 102450-002 and RWP 2006-200 1.

Canister closure consisted of welding the canister lid to the shell, welding the vent and drain port cover plates to the canister lid, and welding the closure rings to the canister lid over the vent and drain port covers. All welds, including tack welds, were inspected using the visual testing (VT) and liquid penetrant (PT) testing methods. In addition, the vent and drain port cover plate welds were leak tested using the mass spectoineter (MSLT) method. All welding and weld testing was performed in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code as required by the Holtec Certificate of Compliance (CoC). Tlie canister welding and weld testing se,oments of CoC Condition 1O.f were completed during this demonstration.

Documents Work Order 745 12, DFS - Testing, dated March 16, 2006 Reviewed: Procedure 30-S-01-135, Dry Fuel Cask Lid M O C I ~Welding, LI~ Helium leak Testing and Lid Removal, Revision Final Page 1 of19

Weld Traveler No. 102450-002, Work Traveler for Installation of MPC Lid to MPC Shell, Drain N e n t Cover to MPC Lid, Set Screws to DrainNent Port Covers and Closure Rings, Revision 0 Radiation Work Permit (RWP) 2006-200 1, MPC Lid Installation and Removal, Revision 0 CategoV: Drv Run Exercise Topic: Canister Unloading Reference: CoC 1014 Condition 10.k Requirement A dry run exercise of removing canister closure welds shall be conducted by tlie licensee prior to the first use of the system to load spent fiiel assemblies.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The dry run exercise to remove the canister lid welds was conducted on March 27-28,2006 in the Rotor Storage Building at the Grand Gulf Station. The dry run exercise used a canister aiid transfer cask mockup and was controlled under Work Order 745 12, Procedure 20-S-01-135, and RWP 2006-2001.

The canister lid welds would be removed during an unloading sequence to return the spent fuel assemblies to the spent fuel pool. The dry run exercise consisted of boring through tlie closure rings and vent and drain port cover plates to expose the vent and drain ports. The closure ring welds and canister shell were then machined down to below the canister lid to shell weld to free the lid. The canister lid weld removal segment of tlie Holtec Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Condition 10.k was completed during this demonstration.

Documents Work Order 745 12, DFS - Testing, dated March 16, 2006 Reviewed: Welding Services Inc (WSI) Procedure 102450, Machining Traveler Procedure 20-S-01-135, Dry Fuel Cask Lid M O C ~ Welding, LI~ Helium leak Testing and Lid Removal, Revision Filial Radiation Work Pennit (RWP) 2006-2001, MPC Lid Installation aiid Removal, Revision 0 CategoV: NDE Personnel Ouals Topic: Certification Records Reference: SNT-TC-1A, Section 9 Requirement Certification records should contain the name of the certified individual, tlie certification level and method, tlie individuals educational background and NDE experience, a statement of satisfactory completion of training per the employers written practice, visual examination results, evidence of successful completion of examinations including grades, date of certification, and the signature of the employer.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The NDE examiner assigned to the demonstration was certified to Level III in VT, PT, and MSLT. His WSI Certificate of Qualification contained all the information required by SNT-TC- 1A.

Documents Procedure QAP 2.7, Revision 11, Attachments 12.5 and 12.6 WSI Certificate of Reviewed: Qualification Procedure QAP 2.7b, Revision 1, Attachments 10.4 and 10.5, WSI Certificate of Qualification Page 2 of 19

Category: NDE Persoiinel Ouals Topic: Experience and Training - PT Level I & I1 Reference: SNT-TC-1A, Section 6, Table 6.3.1 Requirement A PT Level I candidate who is a high school graduate or equivalent, or who is has completed 2 years of engineering or science study, must have 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of training aiid 1 month of work time experience.

A PT Level I1 candidate who is a high school graduate or equivalent, must have 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of training aiid 2 months of work time experience.

A PT Level II candidate who has completed 2 years of engineering or science study must have 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of training and 2 months of work time experience.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 2.7 was the Welding Services Inc.

(WSI) written practice for NDE examiners performing the Liquid Penetrant (PT) testing method. Section 6 and Attachment 12.1 of the written practice specified the miiiimuin education, training and experience requirements for each level of certification. The requirements for PT Level I and 11certification were coiisisteiit with SNT-TC-IA.

The NDE examiner assigned to the deinonstration was certified to Level III in Liquid penetrant (PT) Testing. His W SI Certificate of Qualification documented that he had met all of the experience requirements for Levels I, I1 and III certification.

Documents Procedure QAP 2.7, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Now Reviewed: Destructive Testing Personnel, Revision 11 Welding Services Inc. (WSI) Certificate of Qualification Category: NDE Personnel Quals Topic: Experience and Training - Level IlI Reference: SNT-TC-lA, Section 6 Requirement A Level III candidate who has completed less than 2 years of engineering or science study must have 4 years of experience comparable to a Level n. A Level 111candidate who has completed 2 years of engineering or science study must have 2 years of experience coinparable to a Level TI. A Level III candidate who has completed 4 years of engineering or science study must have 1 year of experience comparable to a Level 11.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 2.7 was the Welding Services Inc.

(WSI) written practice for NDE examiners performing the liquid penetrant testing method. Procedure QAP 2.7a was the written practice for NDE examiners performing helium leak testing using the mass spectrometer. Procedure QAP 2.7b was the written practice for NDE examiners performing the visual testing method.

The written practices for liquid penetrant testing and visual testing contained the experience requirements for Level ILI certification, consistent with SNT-TC-1A.

However, the written practice for helium leak testing did not specify Level III experience requirements.

The NDE examiner assigned to the demonstration was certified to Level III in all NDE methods used. His WSI Certificate of Qualification documented that he had met all of the experience requirements for Level TII certification in the liquid penetrant, visual testing and helium leak testing methods.

Page 3 of19

lhxments Procedure QAP 2.7, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Non-Reviewed: Destiuctive Testing Personnel, Revision 11 Procedure QAP 2 7 a , Selection, Training, Qualification aiid Certification of Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detection Non-Destructive Inspection (NDT) Persoiinel, Revision 1 Procedure QAP 2.7b, Selection, Training, Qualification aiid Certification of Visual Iiispection Personnel, Revision 1 Welding Services Inc. (WSI) Certificate o f Qualification CategoV: NDE Personnel Quals Topic: Experience and Training - MSLT Level I & II Reference: SNT-TC-1A, Section 6, Table 6.3.1 Requirement An MSLT Level I candidate wlio is a high school graduate or equivalent must have 40 horns of training and 4 months of work tiine experience.

An MSLT Level I candidate wlio has completed 2 years of engineering or science shidy inust have 28 hours3.240741e-4 days <br />0.00778 hours <br />4.62963e-5 weeks <br />1.0654e-5 months <br /> o f training and 4 months of work time experience.

An MSLT Level I1 candidate who is a high school graduate or equivalent, must have 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of training and 6 months of work time experience.

An MSLT Level I1 candidate who has completed 2 years of engineering or science shtdy must have 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> of training and 6 months of work time experience.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 2.7a was the Welding Services h c .

(WSI) written practice for NDE examiners performing leak testing using the helium mass spectrometer (MSLT). Section 5 of tlie written practice specified tlie ininimuin education, training and experience requirements for each level of certification. The requirements for MSLT Level I and II certification were consistent with SNT-TC-1A.

The NDE examiner assigned to the demonstration was certified to Level 111 in helium mass spectrometer leak testing (MSLT). His WSI Certificate of Qualification documented that he had met all of the experience requirements for Levels I, I1 and 111 certification.

Documents Procedure QAP 2.7a, Selection. Training, Qualification and Certification of Helium Reviewed: Mass Spectrometer Leak Detection Non-Destructive Inspection (NDT) Personnel, Revision 1 Welding Services Inc. (WSI) Certificate of Qualification Category: NDE Personnel Quals Topic: Experience and Training; - VT Level I & II Reference: SNT-TC-1A, Section 6, Table 6.3.1 Requirement Level I: A VT candidate who is a high school graduate or equivalent, must have 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of training and 1 month of work time experience. A VT candidate wlio has completed 2 years of engineering or science study, must have 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of training and 1 month of work time experience.

Level 11: A VT candidate who is a high school graduate or equivalent, must have 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> of training and 2 months of work time experience. A VT candidate wlio has completed 2 years of engineering or science shidy, must have 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of training and 2 months of work time experience.

Page 4 of 19

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 2.7b was the Welding Services Inc.

(WSI) written practice for NDE examiners performing the visual testing (VT) method.

Section 5 of the written practice specified the minilnuin education, training and experience requirements for each level of certification. The requirements for VT Level I and I1 certification were consistent with SNT-TC-1A.

The NDE examiner assigned to the demonstration was certified to Level 111 in Visual Testing (VT). His WSI Certificate of Qualification documented that he had met all of the experience requirements for Levels I, 11 and III certification.

Documents Procedure QAP 2.7b, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certificatioii of Visual Reviewed: Inspection Personnel, Revision 1 Welding Services Inc. (WSI) Certificate of Qualification CategOV: NDE Personnel Quals Topic: Eye Examination Refmmce: SNT-TC-1A, Section 8.2 Requirement Tlie NDE examiner should have natural or corrected near-distance acuity in at least one eye capable of reading Jaeger Number 1 at a distance of not less tliaii 12 inches on a standard Jaeger test chart, or capable of perceiving a minirnuin of 8 on an Ortlio-Rater test pattern. This should be verified annually. The NDE examiner should demonstrate the capability of distinguishing and differentiating contrast among colors used in the applicable method. This should be verified every 3 years.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 2.7b required all levels of VT certification to undergo annual vision testing for near distance acuity and color differentiation. Procedure QAP 2.7 required all levels of PT certification to undergo annual vision testing for near distance acuity and color differentiation. Procedure QAP 2.7a required all levels of MSLT certification to undergo annual visioii testing for near distance acuity. All vision testing requirements were consistent with SNT-TC-1A.

Tlie NDE examiner assigned to the demonstration was certified to Level IlI in VT, PT, and MSLT. His WSI Vision Examination Record documented that he had successfully completed vision testing for near distance acuity and color differentiation on January 6, 2006.

Documents Procedure QAP 2.7, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Nou-Reviewed: Destructive Testing Personnel, Revision 11 Procedure QAP 2.7a, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detection Non-Destructive Inspection (NDT) Personnel, Revision 1 Procedure QAP 2.7b, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Visual Inspection Personnel, Revision 1 WSI Vision Examination Record Page 5 of 19

Category: NDE Personnel Quals Topic: Recertification Reference: SNT-TC-IA, Section 9 Requirement Maximum recertification intervals are 3 years for Levels I and 11, and 5 years for Level III. Recertification may be granted without testing provided there is documented continuing satisfactory perfoimance. Continuing must be defined in the written practice. Without documented continuing satisfactory performance, reexamination is required for those sections deemed necessary by the Level 111 examiner.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 2.7b required VT Level I and I1 examiners to re-certify every 3 years, and VT Level III examiners to re-certify every 5 years, both by examination. Procedure QAP 2.7 required PT Level I and I1 examiners to re-certify every 3 years and Level III PT examiners to re-certify every 5 years, both by examination. Procedure QAP 2.7a required MSLT Level I and I1 examiners to re-cei-tifjl every 3 years and Level 111MSLT examiners to re-certify every 5 years, both by examinatio11.

All levels of NDE certification were required to re-certify by examination if interrupted service exceeded 6 months for VT or 12 montlis for PT and MSLT. Tlie NDE examiner assigned to the demonstration was certified to Level 111 in VT, PT, and MSLT. His WSI Certificate of Qualification documented that he was current in all certifications.

Documents Procedure QAP 2.7, Selection, Training, Qualiticatioii and Certification of Non-Reviewed: Destructive Testing Personnel, Revision 1 1 Procedure QAP 2.7a, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detection Non-Destructive Inspection (NDT) Personnel, Revision 1 Procedure QAP 3.7b, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Visual Inspection Personnel, Revision 1 Welding Services Inc. (WSI) Certificate of Qualification CategoV: NDE Personnel Quals Topic: Written Practice Reference: SNT-TC-1A, Section 5 Requirement Tlie employer shall establish a written practice for control and administration of NDE personnel training, examination and certification. The written practice should describe the responsibility of each level of certification for determining the acceptability of material or components. The written practice shall describe the training experience and examination requirements for each level of certification.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 2.7 was the Welding Services Inc.

(WSI) written practice for NDE examiners performing tlie liquid penetrant, magnetic particle and ultrasonic testing methods. Procedure QAP 2.7a was tlie WSI written practice for NDE examiners performing helium leak testing using the mass spectrometer. Procedure QAP 2.7b was the WSI written practice for NDE examiners performing the visual testing method.

All three of the written practices: a) defined tlie capabilities of each level of certification for determining the acceptability of material or components; b) specified the niiiiiinum education, training and experience requirements for each level of certification; and c)

Page 6 of 19

contained the minimum examination requirements for each level of certification.

Documents Procedure QAP 2.7, Selectioii, Training, Qualification and Certification of Non-Reviewed: Destructive Testing Personnel. Revision 11 Procedure QAP 2.7a, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detection Non-Destructive Inspection (NDT) Personnel, Revision 1 Procediire QAP 2.7b, Selection, Training, Qualification and Certification of Visual Inspection Personiiel, Revision 1 Category: NDE Procedures - PT Topic: Acceptance Criteria Rderence: ASME Section 111, Article NB-53 52 Requirement Only indications with major diinensions greater than 1/16 inch should be considered relevant. The following relevant indications are unacceptable: (1) any cracks or linear indications. Linear indications have a length at least 3 times greater than the width; (2)

rounded indications with dimensions greater than 3/16 inch (4.8 inin); (3) more than four rounded indications in a line, separated by 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) or less edge to edge; and (4) more than ten rounded indications in any 6 square inch area in the most unfavorable location relative to the indications being evaluated.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.6, Section 7.0 and Attacluiient 11.2 contained the acceptance criteria specified by ASME Section 111, Article NB-5352.

During the demonstration no unacceptable indications were identified.

Ihxments Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

Category: NDE Procedures - PT Topic: Minimum Elements Reference: ASME Section V, Article 6, T-621 Requirement Each liquid penetrant (PT) procedure shall include the: (1) materials, shapes or sizes to be examined; (2) type of each penetrant, remover, emulsifier, and developer; (3) pre-examination cleaning and drying, including the cleaning inaterials used and minimum time allowed for drying; (4) applying the penetrant, the length of time the penetrant will remain on the surface (dwell time), and the temperature of the surface during examination; ( 5 ) removing excess penetrant and drying the surface before applying the developer; (6) length of developing time before interpretation; and (7) post-examination cleaning.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.6, Section 6.0 contained all of the elements required by ASME Section V, Article 6, T-621.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, . Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

Category: NDE Procedures - PT Topic: Noli Standard Temperature Reference: ASME Section V, Article 6, T-653 Requirement When performing liquid penetrant examinations outside the range of 50 to 125 degrees F, the examiner may use a standard temperature procedure or a non-standard temperature procedure. In either case, the examination procedure requires qualification at the Page 7 of 19

proposed higher or lower temperature. This shall require the use of a quench cracked aluiniiiurn block, also designated as a liquid penetrant comparator block.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP-9.16 was developed for use on metals between 100 and 300 degrees F. Step 2.3 of the procedure stated that the procedure had been qualified in accordance with ASME Code,Section V, Article 6. The qualification record was located in the Welding Services hic (WSI) corporate office.

Documents Procedure QAP-9.16, High Temperature Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Using Reviewed: Color Visible/Solvent Removal Penetrant Techiiique, Revision 2 Category: NDE Procedures - PT Topic: Permanent Record Reference: ASIvfE Section V, Article 6, T-676 Requirement The inspection process, including findings (indications), shall be made a perinanent part of the users records by video, photographic, or other means which provide an equivaleiit retrievable record of weld integrity. The video or photographic records should be taken during the filial interpretation period.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.6, Section 8.0 and Attachment 11.1 documented the record of weld integrity. The canister mockup shell base metal repair performed under condition report CR-GGN-2006-0 1 157 was documented in a weld map and subsequent liquid penetrant testing found no indications.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed: Condition Report CR-GGN-2006-01157 CategoV: NDE Procedures - VT Topic: Acceptance Criteria Reference: Holtec FSAR 1014, Section 9.1.1.4 Requirement Confinement boundary welds shall be visually examined in accordance with ASME Code Section V, Article 9 with acceptance criteria per ASME Code Section HI, Subsection NF, Article NF-5360. Article NF-5360 includes arc strikes and blemishes, cracks, craters, fiwion, overlap, porosity, weld lengths, weld thicluiess, slag, and undercut.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. During the demonstration, visual testing (VT) was performed on the lid to shell welds, vent and drain port cover plate welds and closure ring welds. The visual testing included all tack welds, intermediate passes and filial passes. Undercut was identified in three areas on the canister moclcup shell following the lid to shell root pass. The licensee generated condition report CR-GGN-2006-0 1 157 to repair the base metal. The undercut in the shell metal was built out using the manual GTAW process. Once the metal thickness was restored, the lid to shell welding cotitiiiiied with the machine GTAW process. All other visual testing results were within the acceptance criteria established in Article NF-5360.

At the time of the demonstration, Procedure QAP 9.3 did not reference ASME Code Section HI, Article NF-5360, and it did not contain the acceptance criteria for craters, porosity or weld lengths. A procedure revision was generated to correct this condition.

Page 8 of 19

Documents Procedure QAP 9.3, -Worknanship and Visual Inspection Criteria for ASME Welding, Reviewed: ~ ~17 ~ i ~ i ~ ~

Condition Report CR-GGN-2006-01157 CategOV: NDE Procedures - VT Topic: Minilnuin Elements Reference: ASME Section V, Article 9, T-921.1 Requirement Each Visual Testing (VT) procedure shall include the: (1) technique used; (2) surface conditions; (3) surface preparation and cleaning; (4) method or tool(s) required for surface preparation: (5) direct or indirect viewing method; (6) special illumination; (7)

equipment to be used; (8) sequence of performing examination; (9) data to be documented; (10) report f o r m to be completed; (1 1) personnel qualifications; and (1 2)

procedure qualification reference.

Finding: This requireinent was implemented. Procediire QAP 9.3, contained all of the visual testing procedure elements required by the ASME code Documents Procedure QAP 9.3, Worknianship and Visual Inspection Criteria for ASME Welding, Reviewed: ~ ~17 ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~

Category: NDE Procedures - VT Topic: Procedure Validation Reference: ASME Section V, Ai-ticle 9, T-941 Requirement The visual testing (VT) procedure shall contain, or reference, a report of what method was used to demonstrate that the examination procedure was adequate. In general, a fine line 1/32 inch (0.8 mm) or less in width, an artificial imperfection or a siinulated condition, located on the surface or a siinilar surface to that to be examined, may be considered as a method for procedure demonstration. The condition or artificial imperfection should be in the least discernible location on the area surface to be examined to validate the procedure.

Finding: This requirement was not fully implemented at the time of the demonstration. Procedure QAP 9.3 had been validated and the validation record was located at the Welding Services Inc. corporate office. However the record was not contained in or referenced by the procedure. A procedure revision was generated to correct this condition.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.3, Workmanship and Visual Inspection Criteria for ASME Welding, Reviewed: ~ ~ ~17 i ~ i ~ , ~

CategoV: NDE Testing - MSLT Topic: Canister Vent and Drain Port Cover Plate Welds Reference: FSAR 1014, Section 9.1.3 Requirement Perform a helium leakage rate test of vent and drain port cover plate welds in accordance with the Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector (MSLD) manufacturers instructions and ANSIN14.5 (1997). The ANSINl4.5 definition of leak tight is 1.0 X lo(-7) ref-cc/sec (air) or 2.0 X lo(-7) ref-cc/sec (helium).

Finding: This requirement was implemented. During the demonstration, the Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detection (HMSLD) system minimum system sensitivity was verified to be 1.O X 1O(-9) ref-cc/sec in the hood mode. The actual leak rate measured Page9of19

on the vent and drain port cover plate welds was less than minimum sensitivity.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.14F, Procedure For Leak Testing of Holtec Multi-Purpose Canister Reviewed: (MPC) Vent and Drain Port Cover Welds, Revision 3 Category: NDE Testing - MSLT Topic: HMSLD Minilnuin Sensitivitv Reference: ANSI N14-5, Section 8.4 Requirement The helium mass spectrometer leak detector (HMSLD) shall have a minimum sensitivity of 1/2 the acceptance leak rate. For example, a package with a leaktight acceptance criteria of 1.O X lo(-7) ref-cc/sec requires a minimum HMSLD sensitivity of 5.0 X lo(-

8) ref-cc/sec. This sensitivity requireinent applies to both the hood and detector probe methods. The HMSLD shall be calibrated to a traceable standard.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.14F, Section 4.0 required helium leak testing to be performed using a mass spectrometer with a minimum instrument sensitivity of 1.0 X lo(-9) ref-cc/sec. Tlie Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detection (HMSLD) system used during tlie demonstration was a Varian 956. The calibration standard was provided by Vacuum Technologies Inc. The calibration standard had a leak rate of 2.9 X IO(-7) ref-cc/sec and was next due for calibration on March 10, 2007.

During tlie demonstration, the HMSLD minimum system sensitivity was verified to be 1.0 X lo(-9) ref-cc/sec in tlie hood mode.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.14F, Procedure For Leak Testing of Holtec Multi-Purpose Canister Reviewed: (MPC) Vent and Drain Port Cover Welds, Revision 3 Category: NDE Testing. - PT Topic: Canister Lid To Shell Weld Refmmce: CoC 1014, App B, Table 3-1 Requirement The results of liquid penetrant testing (PT) on the canister lid to shell welds meet the acceptance criteria of ASME Section 111, Article NB-5350. This includes tlie root pass, each 3/8 intennediate pass, final pass, and the post hydrostatic test.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Liquid penetrant testing was performed on the canister lid to shell root pass, 3/8 intermediate passes, and final pass in accordance with Procedure QAP 9.6. Tlie testing results were within the acceptance criteria of ASME Section III,Article NB-5350. Hydrostatic testing was outside the scope of this demonstration and was not performed. The post hydrostatic liquid penetrant testing is redundant and will not be demonstrated.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

Category: NDE Testing - PT Topic: Canister Vent and Drain Port Cover Plate Welds Reference: CoC 1014, App B, Table 3- 1 Requirement Verify the results of liquid penetrant testing on tlie vent and drain port cover plate welds meet the acceptance criteria of ASME Section ILI,Article NB-5350. This includes the root and final pass.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Liquid penetrant testing was performed on the vent and drain port cover plate root pass and final pass in accordance with Procedure QAP Page 10 of 19

9.6. Tlie testing results were within the acceptance criteria of ASME Section 111, Article NB-5350.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

Category: NDE Testing - PT Topic: Cleanins Reference: ASME Section V, Article 6, T-642 (b)

Requirement Prior to each liquid penetrant examination, the surface to be examined and all adjacent areas within one inch must be dry and clean.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.6, Step 5.10 contained the iiistructions for surface cleaning and drying. The instructions were consistent with ASME Section V, Article 6, T-642 (b) and were followed during the demonstration.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Iiispectioii Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

Category: NDE Testing. - PT Topic: contaminants Reference: ASME Section V, Article 6, T-641 Requirement The user shall obtain certification of contaminant content for all liquid penetrant agents used on austenitic stainless steels. The certifications shall include tlie manufacturers batch number and sample results. Sub-article T-641(b) limits tlie total halogen (chlorine plus fluorine) content of each agent (penetrant, cleaner and developer) to 1 .O weight percent (wt./) when used on austenitic stainless steels.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. During tlie demonstration, Welding Services Inc.

was using Sherwin DR-60 cleanerhemover (batch # 926-J4), DP-40 penetrant (batch #

Ol-J1) and D-100 developer (batch # Ol-H6). Tlie certification documentation for each of tlie liquid penetrant products being used indicated the total halogen (chlorine plus fluorine) content was less than 1.O weight percent.

Documents Sherwin Dubl-Chek certification records Reviewed:

Category: NDE Testing. - PT Topic: Excess Penetrant Removal Reference: ASME Section V, Article 6, T-673.3 Requirement Excess solvent removable penetrants shall be removed by wiping with a cloth or absorbent paper until most traces of the penetrant have been removed. The remaining traces shall be removed by lightly wiping tlie surface with a cloth or absorbent paper moistened with solvent. Care shall be taken to avoid the use of excess solvent.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Tlie instructions for removiiig excess penetrant were contained in Step 6.5.4 of Procedure QAP 9.6. Tlie iiistructions were consistent with the ASME Section V, Article 6, T-673.3 requirements and were followed during the demonstration.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

Page 11 of 19

Category: NDE Testing. - PT Topic: Filial Interpretation Reference: ASME Section V, Article 6, T-676.1 Requirement Final interpretation shall be made after allowing the penetrant to bleed-out for 7-60 minutes under standard temperatures (50 and 125 degrees F). The 7-60 minute clock starts immediately after application of a dry developer. For wet developer, tlie clock starts when tlie coating is dry.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.6, Step 6.8.1 specified a 10-60 minute bleed-out time. During the demonstration, tlie final interpretations were made within the allowable time limits.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

Category: NDE Testiiig. - PT Topic: Lighting R e f ~ t m ~ :ASME Section V, Article 6, T-676.3 Requirement For color contrast penetrants, a minimum light intensity of 50 foot-candles is required to ensure adequate sensitivity during examination and evaluation of indications.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.6, Step 6.8 required a minimum light intensity of 100 footcandles for liquid penetrant examinations. During the demonstration, the light intensity was approximately 3 00 footcandles, as measured with a digital Greenlee light meter with a calibration due date of February 6, 2007.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6, Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed:

CategoW: NDE Testing. - VT Topic: Eve Position and Lighting Reference: ASME Section V, Article 9, T-952 Requirement Direct visual examinations shall be conducted with the eye within 24 (6 10 mm) of the surface, at an angle not less than 30 degrees. The light intensity must be at least 100 footcandles.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure QAP 9.3, Section 6.1 contained the ASME code requirements for eye position and lighting. During tlie demonstration, visual testing was performed using the correct eye position. Tlie light intensity was approximately 300 footcandles, as measured with a digital Greenlee light meter with a calibration due date of February 6, 2007.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.3 , Worlunanship and Visual Inspection Criteria for ASME Welding, Reviewed: ~ ~17 ~ i ~ i ~ ~

Category: Welding Materials Topic: Applicable Code Reference: Holtec FSAR # 1014, Section 7.1.1 Requirement The HI-STORM 100 canister is designed, fabricated and tested in accordance with ASME Code Section JII, Division 1, Subsection NE3, 1995 edition with addenda through 1997, to the maximum extent practicable.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Tlie Weldstar Certificate of Compliance stated that tlie welding spool wire and cut lengths met the requirements of ASME code edition 1989 Page 12 of 19

with no addenda through and including edition 1995 with addenda through 1997.

Documents Grand Gulf Purchase Order No. 10115782 Reviewed: Weldstar Certificate of Compliance dated March 2, 2006.

CategoW Welding Materials Topic: Minimum Delta Ferrite Content Reference: ASME Section ID,Article NB-2433; Reg Guide 1.31 Requirement A delta ferrite determination must be made for A-No.5 consuinable inserts, bare electrode, rod, or wire filler metal. Exceptions: 1) A-No.8 metal used for weld metal cladding; 3) SFA-5.4 and SFA-5.9 metal; 3) Type 16-5-2 metal. The minilnuin acceptable delta ferrite content is 5 FN and it must be stated in the certification records.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The ARCOS Certificate of Compliance certified that the delta ferrite content of the weld wire spool was 1OFN and the delta ferrite content of tlie cut lengths was 8FN.

Documents Grand Gulf Purchase Order No. 101 18782 Reviewed: ARCOS Industries Certificate of Compliance dated February 28, 2006.

CategoW: Welding Materials Topic: Spool Wire Splicing Reference: ASME, Section 111, Articles NB-2420; NC-2420 Requirement A maximum of one splice per spool is allowed. When the producing inill allows splicing, a chemical analysis shall be performed on each end of tlie spool. If the producing mill prohibits splicing, the chemical analysis is only required on one end of tlie spool.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The weld wire spool supplied by ARCOS had not been spiced. The ARCOS Certificate of Compliance contained the chemistry analysis for one end of the spool and there was only one lot number.

DOCuments Grand Gulf Purchase Order 10118782 Reviewed: ARCOS Industries Certificate of Compliance dated February 28, 2006.

CategoW Welding Personnel Quals Topic: Welder Performance Qualification Reference: ASME Section E, Parts QW-301.4,356,452.1, 6 Requirement The record of welder performance qualification (WPQ) tests shall include the essential variables listed in QW-350, the type of test and test results, and the ranges qualified in accordance with QW-452. Tlie essential variables for manual GTAW welding are: (1)

Backing; (2) Base metal P-number; (3) Filler metal F number; (4) Consumable inserts; ( 5 ) Filler metal form; (6) Maimum weld deposit tliicluiess; (7) Welding positions; (8)

Welding progression; (9) inert gas backing; and (10) Current type and polarity. Two side bend tests are required for groove weld test coupons 3/8 inch thick or greater.

Groove weld tests qualify fillet welds.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Tlie Welder Performance Qualification (WPQ) for each welder contained all of the elements required for manual GTAW. The coupons were tested under transverse side bending in accordance with QW-161.1 and QW-462.2.

The results of all tests were acceptable.

Page 13 o f 19

Documents Welding Services Inc. (WSI) ASME Section M Welder Perfoiinatice Qualification Reviewed: records CategoV: Welding Personnel Ouals Topic: Welding Operator performance Oualification Reference: ASME Section M, Parts QW-301.4, 361.2, 452.1, 6 Requirement The record of welding operator performance qualification (WOPQ) tests shall include the essential variables listed in QW-360. the type of test and test results, and the ranges qualified in accordance with QW-452. The essential variables for machine welding are:

(1) welding process; (2) direct or remote visual control; ( 3 ) automatic arc voltage control (GTAW); (4) automatic joint tracking; ( 5 ) position qualified; (6) consumable inserts; (7) backing; and (S) single or multiple passes per side. Two side bend tests are required for groove weld test coupons 3/8 inch thick or greater. Groove weld tests qualifL fillet welds.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The Welder Perfortnance Qualification (WPQ) for each welder contained all of the elements required for machine GTAW. The coupons were tested under either transverse side bending in accordance with QW-16 1.1 and QW-462.2 or radiographic examination in accordance with QW-191 and QW-302.3. The results of all tests were acceptable.

DOCuments Welding Services Inc. (WSI) ASME Section K Welder Performance Qualification Reviewed: records CategoV: Welding Personnel Ouals Topic: Welding Performance Qualification Expiration Ref~~ence: ASME Section M, Part QW-322.1 Requirement The performance qualification of a welder or welding operator, for any process, shall expire when he has not welded with that process for six months or more.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. At the time of the inspection, all welders and welding operators were current in both tnanual GTAW and machine GTAW. The Welder Maintenance Logs documented the welding histories of all welders and welding operators and established expiration dates 6 months from the last perfonnance of each welding process.

~ocuments Welding Services Inc. ASME IX Process Expiration Reports dated February 16,2006 Reviewed: and March 08, 2006 Welding Services Inc. Welder Maintenance Logs CategoV: Welding Procedures Topic: Applicable Code Reference: Holtec FSAR 1014, Section 9.1.1.3 Requirement All ASME code welding shall be performed using welding procedures that have been qualified in accordance with ASME Code Section IX and the applicable subsection (e.g.,

NB, NG, or NF).

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Step 2.4 of the Weld Traveler required all welding to be performed using welding procedures WPS-08-08-T-901 and WPS-08-OS-TS-001.

Both welding procedures had been qualified in accordaiice with ASME Code Section IX.

Page 14 of 19

Documents Weld Traveler No. 102450-002, Work Traveler for Installation of MPC Lid to MPC Reviewed: Shell, Drain /Vent Cover to MPC Lid, Set Screws to Drain/Vent Port Covers and Closure Rings, Revision 0 Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-00 1, Revision 2.

Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-T-90 1, Revision 0 CategW: Welding Procedures Topic: GTAW Essential Variables Reference: ASME Section E,Part QW-256 Requirement The welding procedure specification for Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) shall describe tlie following essential variables: (1) Base metal thickness range; (2) Base metal P number; (3) Filler metal F number; (4) Filler metal A number; (5) Filler metal product form (flux, metal, powder); (6) Maximum weld deposit thiclcness; (7)

Minimum preheat temperature; (8) PWHT conditions; (9) Shielding gas mixture; and (1 0) Trailing Shielding gas mixture and flow rate.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS)

governed both inanual and machine Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW). Tlie WPSs contained tlie essential variables required by ASME Section IX,Part QW-256.

Documents Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-001 ,Revision 2 Reviewed: Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-T-90 1, Revision 0 Category: Welding Procedures Topic: GTAW Noli Essential Variables (1-14)

Reference: ASME Section IX,Part QW-256 Requirement The welding procedure specification for Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) must describe tlie following non-essential variables: (1) Joint design; (2) Backing; (3)

Backing material; (4) Root spacing; (5) Retainers; (6) Filler metal size; (7)

Consumable inserts; (8) Filler metal SFA specification number; (9) Filler metal AWS classification number; (10) Welding positions; (1 1) Welding progression; (12) Trailing Shielding gas composition and flow rate; (13) Pulsing current; (14) Current type and polarity; Finding: This requirement was implemented. Tlie Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS)

governed both inanual and machine Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW). The WPSs contained tlie non-essential variables required by ASME Sectioii E, Part QW-256.

Documents Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-001, Revision 2 Reviewed: Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-T-901, Revision 0 CategoW: Welding Procedures Topic: GTAW Noli Essential Variables (1 5-27)

Reference: ASME Section IX, Part QW-256 Requirement The welding procedure specification for Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) must also describe the following non-essential variables: (15) Amperage range; (1 6) Voltage range; (1 7) Tungsten size; (1 8) String or weave bead; (19) Orifice or gas cup size; (20)

Method of initial and interpass cleaning; (2 1) Method of back: gouging; (22) Oscillation width; (23) Multiple or single pass per side; (24) Multiple or single electrodes; (25)

Electrode spacing; (26) Travel mode and speed; and (27) Peening.

Page 15 of 19

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Both Weld Procedure Specifications described the non-essential variables listed in ASME Section IX, Part QW-256. During tack welding of the lid to the shell, the welding operator exceeded the amperage range specified in WPS-08-08-TS-001. A stand down was immediately initiated by Welding Services Inc.

(WSI) and the licensee to review the condition. The licensee generated condition report CR-GGN-2006-01154 to document the occurrence and to identify the corrective actions needed to prevent recurrence. No fiii-ther procedure violations were identified.

Documents Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-00 1, Manual GTAW, Revision 2 Reviewed: Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-T-901, Machine GTAW, Revision 0 Condition Report CR-GGN-2006-01154 Category: Welding Procedures Topic: GTAW Supplementarv Essential Variables Reference: ASME Section M, Part QW-256 Requiremen t The welding procedure specification for Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) must describe the following supplementary essential variables, when required: (1) Base metal group number; (2) Base metal thickness range; ( 3 ) Welding positions; (4) Maximum interpass temperature; (5) PWHT conditions; (6) Current type and polarity); (7)

Multiple or single pass per side; and (8) Multiple or single electrodes.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS)

governed both manual and machine Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW). The WPSs contained the supplementary essential variables required by ASME Section M, Part QW-256.

Documents Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-00 1, Revision 2 Reviewed: Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-T-90 1, Revision 0 Category: Welding Procedures Topic: Procedure Qualification Record (PQR]

Reference: ASME Section IX,Part QW-200.2 Requirement Each manufacturer or contractor shall prepare a Procedure Qualification Record (PQR)

for each procedure. The completed PQR shall document all essential and, when required, all supplementary essential variables of QW-250 through QW-280 for each welding process used during the welding of the test coupon. Noli essential variables may be documented at the contractors option. The PQR shall be certified accurate by the inaiiufacturer or contractor.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The Procedure Qualification Records (PQRs)

supported their associated Welding Procedure Specifications for manual and machine Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW). The PQRs documented all of the essential and supplementary essential variables for the inanual and machine GTAW welding processes used during welding of the test coupons. The PQRs had been certified accurate by Welding Services Inc., and had been approved by the Grand Gulf Site Welding Engineer.

Documents Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-00 1, Revision 2 Reviewed: Weld Procedure Qualification PQR-08-08-TS-00 1, Revision 0 Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-T-901,Revision 0 Weld Procedure Qualification PQR-08-08-T-90 1, Revision 0 Page 16 of 19

CategoW: Welding; Procedures Topic: Sainpliiig For Combustible Gases Reference: COC 1014, App B, 3.8; FSAR 1014, Table 8.0.1 Requirement During the canister lid-to-shell welding operations, combustible gas monitoring of tlie space under the canister lid is required, to ensure that there is no combustible mixture present iii tlie welding area. Tlie space below tlie canister lid shall be evacuated or purged prior to and during these activities.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Procedure 20-S-01-135 Section 8.1.3 established an air flow through the canister using an explosion proof (air eductor type) vacuum system.

Tlie vacuum system evacuated the area below the canister lid through the vent port.

Replacement air entered the canister around the lid to shell gap.

Procedure 20-S-01-135 Section 8.1.3 initiated combustible gas monitoring of the space under tlie canister lid prior to welding tlie canister lid to tlie shell during a loading sequence. Section 8.2.3 of the procedure initiated combustible gas monitoring prior to removing tlie canister lid during an unloading sequence. During tlie demonstration, the coinbustible gas evacuation and sampling operations were performed in accordance with the procedure.

The combustible gas monitor used during tlie demonstration was an Industrial Scientific SP 402 Sampling Pump Model TMX412 with a calibration due date of April 30, 2006.

The inoiiitor drew a 0.5 liter per minute (lpm) continuous sainple through the vent port using its own internal pump.

Documents Procedure 20-S-01-135, Dry Fuel Cask Lid Mockup Welding, Helium leak Testing and Reviewed: Weld Removal, Revision Final Category: Welding Procedures Topic: Tack Welds Reference: ASME Section III,Article NB-423 1.1 Requirement Tack welds used to secure alignment shall either be removed completely when they have served their purpose, or their stopping and starting ends shall be properly prepared by grinding or other suitable means so that they may be satisfactorily incorporated into tlie final weld. When tack welds are to become part of the finished weld, they shall be visually examined and defective tack welds shall be removed.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. The canister lid to shell tack welds were completed by Welding Services Iiic. (WSI) using the manual GTAW process. Some ininor grinding was required on some of the tack weld stopping and starting ends, for incorporation into tlie root pass. The canister lid to shell tack welds were satisfactorily incorporated into tlie root pass.

Documents Weld Traveler No. 102450-002, Work Traveler for Installation of MPC Lid to MPC Reviewed: Shell, Drain /Vent Cover to MPC Lid, Set Screws to DrainNent Port Covers and Closure Rings, Revision 0 Page 17 of 19

Category: Welding Procedures Topic: Weld Repairs - Base Metal Defects Reference: ASME Section III, Article NB-4132 Requirement Weld repairs exceeding in depth tlie lesser of 3/8 inch (1 0 mm) or 10 percent of tlie section thickness, shall be documented on a report which shall include a chart which shows tlie location aiid size of the prepared cavity, the welding material identification, the welding procedure, the heat treatment, and the examination results of the weld repair.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. During the performance of tlie lid to shell root pass, base metal defects were identified in three areas of the canister mocliup shell. Tlie defects were greater than tlie 10% allowed by tlie code. The Grand Gulf Site Welding Engineer issued condition report CR-GGN-3006-01157 to document tlie defects aiid to provide a written program for repairing them. Tlie defects were ground clean and prepared for re-welding. Prior to tlie repair, tlie excavated areas were visually examined in accordance with Procedure QAP 9.3 and examined by liquid penetrant in accordance with Procedure QAP 9.6. The base metal repair was performed using the manual GTAW process in accordance with WPS 08-08-TS-001. After the repair was completed, the repaired areas were again visually examined and subjected to a liquid penetrant examination. Tlie examination results were satisfactory and tlie repair was accepted by the licensee.

Documents Procedure QAP 9.6. Liquid Penetrant Inspection Procedure, Revision 10 Reviewed: Procedure QAP 9.3, Worlunansliip and Visual Inspection Criteria for ASME Welding, Revision 17 Weld Traveler No. 102450-002, Work Traveler for Installation of MPC Lid to MPC Shell, Drain N e n t Cover to MPC Lid, Set Screws to Draiifleiit Port Covers and Closure Rings, Revision 0 Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-00 1 Condition Report CR-GGN-2006-0 I 157 Category: Welding Procedures Topic: Weld Repairs - Surface Defects Reference: ASME Section m, Article NB-4452; NB-253 8.c Requirement Surface defects may be removed by grinding or machining without weldout provided tlie minimum section thickness is maintained, tlie depression is blended and liquid penetrant testing is performed to ensure tlie defect is removed. Areas ground to remove oxide scale or other mechanically caused impressions for appearance or to facilitate proper ultrasonic testing need not be examined by tlie magnetic particle or liquid penetrant test method.

Finding: This requirement was implemented. Some iniiior surface defects were identified during the lid to shell root pass, 3/8 inch intermediate pass aiid final weld. Tlie defects included weld starts and stops and some minor undercut. Tlie defects were ground out and tlie required visual and liquid penetrant examinations were performed satisfactorily.

Documents Weld Traveler No. 102450-002, Work Traveler for Installation of MPC Lid to MPC Reviewed: Shell, Drain Neiit Cover to MPC Lid, Set Screws to Draiiflent Port Covers and Closure Rings, Revision 0 Page IS of19

Category: Welding Procedures Topic: Weld Tvpes Fkh-ence: FSAR 1014, Table 7.1.2 Requirement The canister confinement boundary weld types- _ shall be as follows:

Lid to shell - Partial Penetration Groove Vent and drain port cover plates to lid - Partial Penetration Groove Closure ring to shell - Fillet Closure ring to lid - Partial Penetration Groove Closure ring to closure ring - Partial Penetration Groove Finding: This requirement was implemented. The weld joint designs described in the Holtec drawings were consistent with the Holtec Filial Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). The welds were made using the welding procedures and were consistent with the Holtec drawings.

Documents Holtec Drawings 2524, Sheets 1,2,3, 6, and 7, Revision 5.

Reviewed: Weld Traveler No. 102450-002, "Work Traveler for Iiistallatioii of MPC Lid to MPC Shell, Drain /Vent Cover to MPC Lid, Set Screws to DrainNeiit Port Covers and Closure Rings", Revision 0 Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-TS-001, Revision 2 Weld Procedure Specification WPS-08-08-T-901, Revision 0 Category: Wrap-Up/Close-Out Topic: ISFSI Pad Concrete Strength Testins Reference: ACI 3 18, Sect 5.6.2.3 Requirement The strength level of an individual class of concrete shall be considered satisfactory if every arithmetic average of any three consecutive strength tests equals or exceeds 3000 psi AND no individual strength test (average of 2 cylinders) falls below 2500 psi.

Finding: Inspection Follow-Up Item 72-050/05-01 was generated during the ISFSI pad construction to track completion of the 28 day compressive strength testing. The 28 day compressive strength testing was performed on August 19, 2005. Every arithmetic average of any three consecutive strength tests exceeded the required 28 day concrete compressive strength of 3000 psi. No individual strength test (average of 2 cylinders)

fell to less than 2500 psi. The break tester was manufactured by Foriiey and controlled under M&TE #Q-040. The calibration due date was February 17, 2006. This Inspection Follow-Up Item has been closed.

Oocuments Grand Gulf Testing Results "ISFSI Slab West End 1st Pour July 21,2005" Reviewed:

Page 19 of 19

Entergy Operations, Inc. -4-bcc w/enclosure (via ADAMS e-mail distrib):\

LDWert CLCain DBSpitzberg GBMiller JJPearson ER Ziegler SPAtwater RLKellar KMKennedy KEGardin FCDB File eview Completed: SPA ADAMS: #Yes No Initials: -spa-

$8 Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available 0 Sensitive $8 Non-Sensitive

Entergy Operations, Inc. -4-bcc w/enclosure (via ADAMS e-mail distrib):\

LDWert CLCain DBSpitzberg GBMiller J JPearson ER Ziegler SPAtwater RLKellar KMKennedy KEGardin FCDB File SUNS1 Review Completed: SPA ADAMS: %Yes 0 No Initials: -spa-

% Publicly Available Cl Non-Publicly Available Cl Sensitive % Non-Sensitive IlSPAtwater

/RA/

I DBSpitzberg

/RA/

I1 04/07/06 04/10/06