IR 05000395/1982001
| ML20041A613 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/1982 |
| From: | Belisle G, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041A610 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-82-01, 50-395-82-1, NUDOCS 8202220340 | |
| Download: ML20041A613 (6) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:, , . / 'o,, UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c, '$ E REGION 11 101 MARlETTA ST N.W., SUITE 3100 g ~ ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 s
Report No. 50-395/82-01
Licensee: South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Columbia, SC 29218 Facility Name: Summer Docket No. 50-395 License No. CPPR-94 Inspection at Summer site near Winnsb,ro, SC Inspector: [[ / [[ V / 88 L G. A. Belisle g Date Signed , Approved by: ['[8/, k # //26!8L C. M. Upright, Sodtio@ Branch ) Tate S'igned - tef Engineering Inspection Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on January 4-8, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 31 inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee action on previously identified items and preoperational test records.
Results Of the two areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
.
8202220340 820201 ADOCK05000g PDH o . . -
,_ . . - - __________ - __--____ ___ ___ _____ _ _ _ _ __ . . , REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees V. Albert, Assistant Manager Support Services
- R. Clary, Manager Nuclear Licensing
- J. Cobb, Technical Support Engineer
- J. Connelly, Deputy Plant Manager
- B. Croley, Assistant Manager Technical Support
- G. Dacier, III, DCC Quality Assurance
- H. Donnelly, ISEG Engineer
- P. Fant, Director, Station Quality Control
- H. Fields, Technical Support Engineer J. Geddings, Lead Electrical Quality Control Inspector J. Hembree, Assistant Startup Supervisor
- S. Howze, Nuclear Licensing
- A. Koon, Technical Services Coordinator F. Lamphere, Office Supervisor F. Leach, Director of Site Engineering
- C. Ligon, Administration Assistant Nuclear Operations
- R. Mayew, Gilbert Associates Licensing Engineer C. McKinney, Instrumentation and Control Supervisor l
- E. Miller, Senior Clerk
[ D. Moore, Manager of Quality assurance ! R. Morton, Records Supervisor
- D. Nauman, Group Manager iaclear Services
- J. Parks, Technical Specialist
- S. Smith, Assistant Manager Maintenance Services
- W. Williams, Jr., General Manager Nuclear Operations NRC Resident Inspector J. Skolds, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 8, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The licensee acknowledged the inspection findings.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters Not inspected.
The following terms are defined and used throughout this report: - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
e ) . .
Accepted QA Program FSAR, Chapter 17 r ( CSSC Critical Structures, Systems and Components j FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report I&C Instrumentation and Control MWR Maintenance Work Request 0QAP Operational Quality Assurance Plan QA Quality Assurance. QC Quality Control QAP Quality Assurance Procedures 4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
' 5.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Findings j a.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-01): Review of Adequacy of Administra- ' tive Organization. The inspector reviewed the 0QAP, Section 3.2.1 and identified that the licensee has included provisions for review of the adequacy of the administrative organization in conjunction with the annual QA Plan review to assure that the organizational charts, departmental functions, and responsibilities are current.
b.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-02): "Q" List and Consumable / Expendable Items. The inspector reviewed the FSAR Question 421.83 (Amendment 24, March 1981); Question 421.16 (Amendment 5, April 1978); and Question 421.66 ( Amendment 8, September 1978) and identified that all items requested by NRR to be added to the "Q" list have been addressed.
Question 421.83-a.20 specifically addresses expendable and consumable items necessary for CSSC performance (i.e., weld rod, fuel oil, boric acid, snubber oil, etc.). The licensee's answer-to this particular subpart of Question 421.83 stated that these items would be included in revised notes to Table 3.2-1.
The notes to Table 3.2-1 state that certain consumable products used in' conjunction with safety-related equipment are considered safety-related. Examples of these items are weld rod, diesel fuel oil, boric acid, lithium hydroxide, etc.
The inspector also reviewed 00AP, Section 8.3.
This section basically identifies the methodology to be used during procurement of parts for CSSC equipment and the determination to be made by Technical Support Engineering (with concurrence of Nuclear Engineering) for changing the classification of parts from safety to non-safety related.
c.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-03): Determination of "Q" and "Non-Q".
The inspector reviewed AP-401, Maintenance Work Request, Revision 3.
Paragraph 5.3.2 allows the responsible supervisor to initially deter-mine if the work being performed on the MWR is safety or non-safety related. This initial determination is not final until verified by QC.
If QC cannot make this determination, it is referred to the Technical Support Group. The inspector interviewed cognizant personnel in QC and - __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. . . . . . _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _. _
Technical Support and verified that they understood their responsi-bilities relative to safety or non-safety related determinations on MWRs.
d.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-04): Distribution and Review of Audit Responses and Corrective Actions. The inspector reviewed OQAP, Section 15.11.1 and identified that correspondence generated regarding audit followup and resolution receive the same distribution as the original audit report.
e.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-05): Outdated References and Titles.
The inspector reviewed a representative sample of QAPs (10 of 25) and identified that erroneous references and outdated titles had been either deleted or corrected.
f.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-06): Specification of Audit Response Time.
The inspector reviewed QAP 21, SCE&G Quality Assurance Audit Report Preparation, Revision 2, Section VII.C and identified that the audit team leader or applicable director will prepare a cover letter transmitting the audit report and requesting a response to the audit conclusions within four weeks af ter the audit report date.
g.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-07): Clarification of OQAP Section 15.3.2 on Technical Audits.
The inspector reviewed 00AP, Section 15.5 and identified that when it is necessary to evaluate the over-all effectiveness of technically based activities, audit teams will have as one or more members technical specialists in the areas being audited.
h.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-08): Escalation Procedure.
The inspector reviewed QAP 19, Internal SCE&G/QA Audits, Revision 2; QAP 20, External SCE&G/QA Audits, Revision 2; and QAP 23, Surveillance of Site Activities, Revision 3.
These procedures state that escalation of audit findings and concerns will be executed as discussed in Management Directive 18.
The inspector reviewed Management Directive 16 which outlines the course of action to be taken for escalation of audit findings. This directive had been approved January 4,1982. Cognizant QA personnel are aware that QAPs 19, 20 and 23, will have to be revised to reference Management Directive 16 vice 18. Drafts of these proce-dures have been submitted for review to upgrade the erroneous reference from Management Directive 18 to Management Directive 16. These proce-dures were reviewed and approved on January 6,1982.
1.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-09): Control of Drawings Under Rev.sion.
The inspector reviewed AP 301.1, Document Control Procedure, Revision 5, Change 5 and identified that controls have been established to assure that drawings are suitably marked, when they have component identification changes pending.
Marking of these drawings assures that personnel using these drawings will be alerted to the fact that changes are in progress.
__ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
- _- - __ . o . , s. /
- - ., . j.
(Cibsed) Open Item (395/80235-10): Docunnt Receipt ' AcKrowledgement'. The inspector reviewed AP 301.1, Dccument Control Procedure, Revisicr.
- 5, Change 4 and identified that a #ixed timeframs (10 working days) ' has 'seen ~ incorporated into,the procedure forTacknowledoing receipt of documents.
- - j - ,
, , k.
(Cicsec) Obn ~ Itu -(395/3Ce35-10: :0C;Gu%9ce On Hold Points. The inspector. reviewed AP-1200,. Qualicy Ccntroi-Inspection Program, Revi-s sion 3, and QCP-G1,.Specificatico-and Jocarentation of Quality Control - .
Inspect 1m Fiequ remets hvision-1, and verit ied - that sufficient i s - ; guicelines n6w eer.t f? i.raiudiN 4 hi4Td' ccints on maintenancb actis ities.
' safety related ' . - y o - ._ _ ~ 1.
(Closed) Cpen Itern (325/W3h-12).: Smit Engineering Procedures. The L.olant a.ngineecing Jp ocedt.bes. thati exis t'ed.when tN s -item was opened (hovembeelS80), hr.ve t:ee5mlited land replaNd with a series of Nuclear Eiig inep ri ng _Pfc.oce_dureJ. The insiebr reyieyed NE-113 ,28, -129, ' . -1,30 ;, -13A. -132,, -M3, - i 34-shd !nenti fieir~tht%.dted' -135, -136, DQM 6. 0, ]AD-3 and AP-1500 ?
' ' for barelity Mdifications appears te b~e - , adequate.
AP-35S'?," Des f gn Modi ficat.icnl Cont rol, Revi sicn 1, contains - ~ requi reriants to-assu[B an hf 91ose rpdi fic'ationse 4.tQt modif;iclidens ara riviewed by groups for intwrobra into existing plant -' - -Ch - procedoros and trainiliipecqt am.
If h00 aly requires that the bas ~is i ~
fW safe ty eva'; amens areM5clu&d as mr; of the modi #ication~ pack- ' W ' ' ' ' aga.
y s , - .i - g , (Closed'X Open Etem.(3%'80'35-D)- J Cal,ibration Procedures.
The . A m.
inspactor reviewed ICF-240.012, 240 c0J? 1 ano _35.009 and vri fied that ' m changer idet.t} fied duting the startu;) te:t'ng~ program had been included in upuates of these procedures as spplicable.
The licensee is in j process of upgrding all-lICPs to refleet -changes identified during . startup thstim - b n.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-14): SEfety Related Classification of
Procadures.
The insoector reviewed cP4 wing D-302-861, Revision 18, J N and corsfirmic that Stack Flow Monitor FT 8252 previously identified c I by thi< i tei i s non-safety related.
The licensee has an ongoing system to ide n ti fy safety-related procedares as they are being writtsn.
_ _ (Closed) Open Item (395/80-3%-15): Dfcrepancie: in Classification of o.
~3 Inspection Items. The inspecter reviewed the 00AP, Sections 9.4.4 and 11.4 and verified *Aat the' classifications of materials are consistent P with ' egulatory requi~rements; i.e., acceptable, hold or reject.
N r p.
(Closed) Open item (395/80-35-16): Operations, Maintenance and / Testing Index.
The inspector reviewed the QA Records and Retention Chart, Revision 4: and identified that Section G has ten indexed sub-paragraphs to fully definq rec _ord types and retention times for these records.
'= s s t .
F ' ,..o . + ' ' ~
, , .. , / .q.
(Closed) Open Item (395/80-35-17): Mechanical Calibiation Incon-sistencies. The inspector reviewed MMP-285.005, Calibration of-Torque Transducers, Amplifiers and Analyzers, Revision 9, and confirmed that .the transducer readout unit used for calibration of torque wrenches will have a sticker applied upcn completion of calibration of thE unfii.
6.
Preoperational Test Records (39301) . .- , References: (a) OQAP, Section-14, Records, Re01sion 7 (b) QAP 16, Quality Assurance < Record's Accumulation and ~ Retention, Revision 3 < (c) AP-301.2, Nuclear Operat. ions Record Control Procedure, Revision 0 q (d) FQCP-2.2.1, Records Filing Procedure, Revision 14-(e) FQCP-2.2.2, Document Issue P,rocedurb~ ' (f) SUM-B-10, Document Control, Revision 1 - ' ^ The inspector reviewed the listed references to assure they met requirements of the accepted QA Program, Regulatory Guide 1.88, and ANSI N-45.2.9 as endorsed by that program. The inspector verified the following aspects of ^ the preoperational test record program: Administrative controls have been established'for maintaining reco.rds - of various activities during the preoperational testing period.
, ' Record storage controls have been establishea w,hich inc'ludeiretendion ' - periods for each type of record.
- ~ , Responsibilities have been assigned for establishing retsntion periods - " of new records.
The inspector toured the records storage facilities (operations vault, construction vault, and startup testing facilities).
Various redords were selected to verify that they were retrievable and indexed adeque.te'iy.., s Based on this review, one inspector followup i. tem was identified. The' licensee is currently storeg startup records in one haur rated fire cabinets in a trailer.
The licensee is also storing'solected records in satellite locations under the same conditions. Discussions with cogn'izant ~ ' i personnel identified that a study was not performed to cetermine~if one-nour cabinets are sufficient as required by ANSI N45.2.9 and NFPA 232-1975._ Until the licensee performs a study to determine the adequacy of storage of records in satellite locations, this is identified as an. inspector. followup ' item (395/82-01-01).
, . - . d . - b e ,, - --_s-_.,- . . - e m }}