IR 05000327/1980002
| ML19312D100 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1980 |
| From: | Herdt A, Vandoorn P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19312D097 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-327-80-02, 50-327-80-2, NUDOCS 8003210020 | |
| Download: ML19312D100 (3) | |
Text
., -,
..f
-
x.;
.
~/
UNITED STATES
!
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
a'
{'
'e REGION 11
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
'
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
. 3, *..****,~
.
o-
'
FEB. 61980 Report.No.- 50-327/80-02 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 Facility Name: Sequoyah Docket No. 50-327
.
License No. CPPR-72
,
Inspection at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant near Chattanooga, Tennessee
//Po Inspector:
,/
u_
_
P. T VanDo 'ra v'
Date' Signed Approved by:
[ d[
-
[3 A.'R. Herdt, Section Chief, RCES Branch Ifat'e Signed SUMMARY Inspection on January 16, 1980 Areas Inspected
,This routine special announced inspection involved 5 inspector-hours onsite in'
the areas of followup of a licensee identified item (50.55(e)) concerning repair of the pressurizer relief line Results e
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
.
,/*
..
,,
9
.k, y
fy
~
~
~
- "3*10.
- O'2-0
-
x
.
.,.
,x
.
.'
DETAILS-1.
Persons Contacted
~ Licensee Employees-
.-
- R. M.'Jessee, ENDES Metallurgical Engineer
' *D.; Wall, OEDC Licensing Engineer
- . L. G. Hebert,' OEDC QA Evaluator
.
- E.
A'.' Merrick, ENDES Metallurgical Engineer.
.
-*M. A. McBurnett, Nuclear Engineer, Regulatory Staff
~*V. D.' Lee, OEDC Mechanical Engineer-
-*D. Gorman, QA Engineer
- J. A. Thompson, Assistant Mechanical Engineering Unit Supervisor
,
- J. Boone, Welding Engineering
- J. Haueterk'elding Engineer
- . J. W. Doty,LMechanicalMaintenance Supervisor
-
'*P. R.-Hitchcock, Mechanical Engineer j
NRC' Resident Inspector W. Cottle-
-
- Attended exit interview
~
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 16, 1980 with i
those' persons indicated.in Paragraph 1 above..The licensee indicated that the detailed data that was. requested concerning the subject licensee
.
identified item would be ~ provided to the NRC (NRR) in a timely manner.
3.'.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings.
i Not_ inspected.
,
-
t 4..
. Unresolved Items-
.
.
.
.
.;
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
j
~
L: 5.
Licensee Identified Item (50.55(e))
'
.(open): Item 50-327/79-36-12: iPressurizer Relief Piping Support (NCR-SWR-
.
79-S-8). :This item concerns'the failure to support IRCH-93 during hot
. functional testing that resulted in deformation of the.six-inch pressurizer f relief line,- and subsequer.t return of the piping to its original'configura-
- tion by' use of a weld bead draw procedure. The inspector attended 'a meeting
- of licensee representatives and the NRC metallurgical' consultant, :R. M.
.Gustafson, ;to discuss actions taken by TVA to' affect: the pipe' repair and
,
"
engineering ~ar.alysis~of these actions. TVA presented data concerning
-
'
'
e. '
m, s
.~(.,~.
'
s g
,
^
'
,J
.
'
-
A
_ _ l. _. k;
~
- A'
>
'e'-
-]
l
"_
~
'
. ; w,a r pc:
, -- :-; n=
.
,.
.
.:
=--
w.
- .
.-
- -.,
,
,
.
.
.
..-.
"'
,g_,i K
w~
.
.r.
<
,
-
i
,
,
V
,
4-2-
- 3
,
p:.
-
location of ' welding. draw beads, general welding procedure, welding procedure
, qualification, results of;intergranular corrosion. testing of a prototype
.
and general repair instructions to NRC. TVA was'not prepared, however, to present data.concerning detailed welding parameters to estimate heat input, system. data to indicate the chemica1' environment that the affected piping
' *
,
z.will be subjected to, and engineering. analysis of stresses associated with
~
- the weld draw beads.. This, data had been previously-requested by NRC (see
'IE:RII Report No. 50-327/79-72). TVA was informed that the additional data
,
was required to be.' submitted to NRC (NRR) in order that the required engi-neering/ metallurgical evaluation ce be performed. This item will remain open pending NRR review of the re.;aested data.
No-items.of noncompliance.or deviations were identified.
'
,
,
i
.
'
\\
i
'
,
IL.
c
-
.
7;,
,
x h
,Y a
,
.
k
't a
g.
~
s
)
h t
i
"
n'
y'
-4-
,
,
. ;.,-
,
,
..
,m
._
.
.,,