IR 05000272/1987011
| ML18092B574 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1987 |
| From: | Eapen P, Winters R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18092B572 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-272-87-11, 50-311-87-14, 50-354-87-12, NUDOCS 8705180395 | |
| Download: ML18092B574 (5) | |
Text
1-
,\\
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No /87-11 50-311/87-14 50-354/87-12 Docket No, 50-311, and 50-354 License No DPR-70, DPR-75,. and NPF-57 Licensee:
Public Service Electric And Gas Company 80 Park Plaza - 17C Newark., New Jersey 07101 Facility Name: Salem Generating Stations Units 1 and 2,and Hope Creek Generating Station Inspection At: Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection Dates:
April 15 - 20, 1987 In~pector'
- Q \\-\\ * K_~
~R. W. Wi~ters, ReactorEf19iflr, QAS, DRS Approved by:
Dr. P. K.apen, Cief)Qliality Assurance Section, Operations Branch, DRS, RI s-/7/g7 date
'
ff/8_1 dat I
.
Inspection Summary: Routine unannounce*d inspection on April 15 - 20, 1987 (Combined Inspection Report Numbers 50-272/87~11, 50-311/87-14, and 50-354/87-12)
Areas Inspected: Effectiveness of Quality Control and Quality Assurance activities in Procurement and Preventative Maintenance for Stored item Results: One violation (failure to perform preventive maintenance on safety related motors in storage in a timely manner) was identifie ~856~72
~DR ADOCK PDR
!
DETAILS 1.0 Persons Contacted Public Service Electric and Gas Company R. Diaz, Senior Engineer, Nuclear Services
- E. Downing, Assistant Manager, Quality Assurance, Salem R. Grable, Manager, Procurement and Material Control R. Lowdon, Procurement Administrator 0. Perkins, Manager, Quality Assurance C. Serata, Engineer, Site Services (Maintenance)
A. Thompson, General Manager, Nuclear Services
- J. Zupko, General Manager, Salem Operations United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- K. Gibson, Resident Inspector, Salem
- Denotes those attending the exit meetin The inspector also interviewed other site personnel during the inspectio.0 Procurement Program Review Procedures were reviewed to determine whether administrative controls clearly described the follow'ing:
Technical, quality assurance and special instructions were included in purchase requisition Requirements for access to vendors facilities for surveillance and audit were included when require Purchase orders included requirements for documentation when require The program included the basis for classification of items (safety related, commercial grade, or other).
The basis for approving the vendor is specifie.2 Implementation To assure that the controls were in place for procurement activities the inspector reviewed the following procedure Procurement Document Review, GM9-l QAP 3-1, Revision 5, 1/22/86 Procurement of Materials From Other Utilities, GM9-QAP 3-Revision 1, 11/18/85 Supplier Evaluation/Approval, Revision 3, 11/18/85 Supplier Surveillance; GM9-QAP 3-3, Revision 2, 1/8/85 Supplier Audits, GM9-QAP 3-5, Revision 2, 11/18/85 Receiving Inspection, GM9-QAP 4.1, Revision 5, 11/18/85 Monitoring of Material Control, GM9-QAP 4.3, Revision 2, 7/26/85
.
Item Classification Guidelines, GM8-EMP-Oll, Revfsion 0, 12/24/85 Nuclear Department Purchase Requisition Processing, Revision 1, 12/17/86 Control of Retained Equipment, GM9-QAP 4-3.1, Revision 0, 1/8/85 Except for GM9-QAP4-3.1, the above procedures were app 1icab1 e to Salem Units 1 and 2 and the Hope Creek plan The Control of Retained Equipment procedure applies to Hope Creek Unit 2 equipment held for use in Hope Creek Unit *
The Nuclear Department Purchase Requisition (NDPR) is the controlling document used for a 11 purchases and it assures that reviews by the engineering and quality assurance organizations are performed for any purchases of items not on the QA - Exceptions Lis Items on the QA
-
Exceptions List include items such as janitorial supplies, office supplies, food services, mobile construction equipment, and cancellation of purchase order *
The inspector selected a sample of approximately ten safety related and commercial grade item NDPR's for review to assure that the appro-priate reviews had been performe Interviews were held with quality assurance personnel and other personnel in the procurement section to determine t effectiveness of - interfaces among procurement, engineering, and quality assurance for these 'requisition aoth engineering and quality assurance have assigned full tim~ individuals to process purchase requisition Subsequent to approval the NDPR was forwarded to the corporate office for issue of the purchase order. Copies of the NDPR and the purchase order are furnished to the receipt inspection group for verification of the i terns on receipt.. Qua 1 i ty Assurance assures that the NDPR requirements are transferred to the purchase orders during regularly scheduled audits:
2.3 Conclusions The procurement system was effectively implemented with engineering and quality assurance review Use of the NDPR with the appropriate signatures and tracking assures that all requirements are addresse No deviations or violations were observe.0 Storage Program Review Storage procedures were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel to verify that:
The storage recommendations of the original equipment manu-facturer (OEM) were incorporated into the storage procedure The storage conditions met the requirements of licensee commitment.2 Implementation Review The inspector noted several large motors in storage with heaters connected as needed a~d the ventilation ports adequately covered with filter material. The storage area was maintained in accordance with ANSI N45.2.2 level B requirements and was free of excessive debris and dir Records of storage locations were satisfactor Review of the OEM manuals for Westinghouse Type LAC Induction Motors and McGraw Edi son manua 1 indicated that these motors were to be stored in a clean area free of excessive dust and dirt, the motor shafts were to be rotated monthly, and the oil level to be checked periodicall Salem Generating Station Maintenance Procedure, Spare Motor Preventive Maintenance, MP3.5, Revision 2, 4/2/86 describes the program in use for the Salem Station motor This procedure adequately addressed the requirements of the OE The inspector reviewed records of preventive maintenance for the below listed safety related motors in storag FOLIO 32-UP06 32-UP07 32-UP12 33-UP18 EQUIPMENT NAME Auxiliary. ~uilding Exhaust Fan Motor Auxiliary Building Supply Fan Motor Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Motor Residual Heat Removal Pump Motor
r-
- '
- ~
The Nuclear Department Work* Order 86-08-12-021-6 was written on August 12, 198 Special instructions stated that the preventive maintenance to be performed under this work order was due on June 13, 1986, and became overdue on June 21, 198 This preventive maint-enance involved monthly shaft rotation and semiannual meggering and calculation of polarization inde Section 5 of this work order indicated that the shaft rotation and tests were not done until March 5, 198 The inspector a 1 so found no record of the monthly shaft rotation for the~e motors in April 198 The above failure to perform the required, preventive maintenance is a violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII and licensee procedure MP3.5 require-ments (50-272/87-11-01 and 50-311/87-14-01).
3.3 Conclusions The storeroom was maintained in an acceptable manner and it met the requirements of ANSI N45.2.2 for Level However, as described above preventative maintenance for safety related motors in storage was not performed in a timely manne.0 Management Meetings Licensee management was informed of the scope and purpose of the inspec-tion at the ent ranee interview on April 15, 198 The findings of the inspecticin were discussed with licensee representatives during the course of the inspection and presented to licensee management at the April 20, 1987 exit intervie '
At no time during the inspection was written material pro.vided to the Hcensee by the inspector. The licensee did not indicate that proprietary information was involved within the scope tif this inspection.