Text

Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,1983
	ML20100J073
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	12/31/1983
From:	Westafer G; FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	James O'Reilly; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
	3F0384-23, 3F384-23, NUDOCS 8504100304
	Download: ML20100J073 (109)
	v • d • e

i s

l l

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 1983 ANNUAL ENVIROlGENTAL OPRRATING REPORT RADIOLOGICAL i

Af'7O APPROVED BY: M kf 'M Nuclear Plant Manager DATE: 3/2 Wi / F4

.R.

E

~

APPROVED BY: [ //o Manager, site nuclear services DATE: // mci j{ /fff

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. - Introduction 'l List of Sampling Stations 3 Site and Area Maps 5 Sample Station Locations 7 II. Milk and Green Leafy Vegetable Census 9 III. Media Other Than External Radiation 10 l Air Inhalation Pathway 11 Precipitation Pathway 19 Sea Water Pathway 22 River Water Pathway 28 Ground Water Pathway 31 Potable Water Pathway 34 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway 38 Seafood Chain Pathway (Marine Plants) 45 Ingestion Pathways Crab 50

Carnivous Fish 55 Herbivorous Fish 60 Oysters 65 Shrimp 69 Milk 73 Animal 77 Food Crops (Citrus) 31

, Food Crops (Watermelon) 83-Food Chain Pathways Grasses 85 Soil 89 Meat 90 Poultry 92 j Eggs 94 Green Leafy Vegetables 96 IV.- External Radiation 101 1

I. INTRODUCTION I

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides information which can be used in assessing the type and quantity of radiation expo-sure, resulting from plant operation, in unrestricted areas. The Program is conducted via a contract with the University of Florf.da, Department of Environmental. Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, and a grant to the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Service s, Orlando, Florida. The parts of the Program for which each are responsible are listed -in Table I-1. Figure I-1 depicts the relationships of the plant . effluents to the food chains and the associated pathway links that - are monitored in the surveillance program. Figures I-2 and I3 provide maps of the offsite and onsite environmental sampling sites surrounding Crystal River Unit 3. Table I-2 provides sample station locations by distance and direction from the plant.

In essence..'the Program provides a continuation of the preoperation program so that any increases of radioactivity in the environment can be detected. No pathway has shown any confirmed increases of radioactiv-ity in the environment due to plant operation during this report period.

Each pathway is addressed in the report, as appropriate, including data summaries, graphical ~ presentations, and narrative.

.i L

e i

i l'

l l l'

s AfA00Aus RELEASES Lioulo A E LE A SE S j

..u...L iC : 1 AIA i gaggaypog SEA W AT E R!

.1 A

e IP SEpiWENTS F04ASC CAWSTACEA W MILIC j / IIIM ~

ts A at CRiflCAL PA TN W AYS

- ~- ~-

I Atm00RNE RELEASCS L Quis atLCASCS 3, 5f AIR {

IEA "ATI' t 4 t 4 4) e E b d b ir

' I* " t" $

' 108L ? F09A0E CACPS h setsipt ATIO N -9 m ADi AT tO N

'~ 8 7 AM'S A 4A 5

'\ '

\\ m-..A sk v s, GAcuMO I [ugLEl " AIE 4

PCTa n L C ,,,g, C -

wATEe waygg

,, s, se ,/ <r i

ttnetSfesAL wiLOLnFC SF

sg ,g e r gr Sr se MAM OfMER Mc Ne t o m t p Pa ru w af S Figure I-1 Environmental Media and Exposure Pothways

TABLE I-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS University Air Submersion C04, C14H*, C14M*, C14G*,

C40, C41, C43, C46 State Air Submersion C07,C09,C18,C26 University Air Inhalation C41*

State Air Inhalation C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C46 State Precipitation C04, C26, C40 University Sea Water C01, C09, C13, C14H, C14M, C14G*

State River Water ,

C15 State Ground Water C40 University Potable Water C07,C10,CIS University Shoreline External C01, C09, C14H*, C14M*, C14G*

Sediment University Seafood Chain C29,C30 University Ingestion Crab C29*, C30 University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Carnivorous)

University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Herbivorous) '

University Ingestion Oysters C29,C30 University Ingestion Shrimp C27 University Ingestion Milk C47,C49*

University Ingestion Animals C45 University Food Chain (Grasses) C05, C40, C41 State Ingestion Food C19 Crops (Citrus)

. TABLE I-l (Continued)

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS State Ingestion Food C04 Crops (Watermelon)

University Food Chain (Soil) C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C41, C46 State Meat C50 State Poultry C51 State Eggs C51 University Food Chain C47, C48*

(Green Leafy Vegetables) f i

Critical Pathway Sample Stations 1.

/

C47 in Gainesville 52 Mi. NNE 15 miles

........3.,

y t

_ -. - ... A

/ ,, , <,s tocn 40 '. ( g ], )

DUNNELLON mi asn t t Tow s uhNtttoN C01 . iNcuscau C3..'C18 C04*a C19 .

- . LFtoRIDA POWER CORP *

5 miles / '

toch & DAM .

f 98 .

. 4, PLANT /M- '

HotDE" k-44 ' CRysiAt CIO RivtR

[

k

""E" ""E

.C09 07 , e,tts Tsata aporn a cut, o,

e. t sico D ,[ .'

N o .

A O -

~

l'f,, '

tccisro ,

Q 6 'C,RYST AL ,. -

HOMOSASSA' *

. '490 4

CIT R U S I

.v I k9._h i A' $ f,-(~~ -N IN 1

(

~ "

Y ,

4 f/ / --T i

OFF-$ITE OPER ATIONAL R ADIOLOGICAL PROGRAM $ AMPLlHG $1TES

, CRYSTAL river UNira Figure I-2

./"

l

\i

/

O d

5

\ \ . I eNT

ls c

Qb

/

l 8

p g/ xA MF 3 \

\ J

(

e v .

\

) \

$p$

5

,x% - e .e Figure I-3 ROGRAM MPLlHG SITES CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 SCALE 1" = 1.I mi.

TABLE I-2 Operational Sample Station Locations Station Distance From Distance From Number Location Plant (miles) Plant C01 Levy County Park 4.9 NW West End State Road 40 C04 State Park Old Dam on 6.3 ENE River near road intersection C05 Entrance to Hollinswood Ranch 3.8 ENE C07 Crystal River Public Water 7.5 ESE Plant C09 Citrus Country Park 3.2 S West End State Road 44 C10 Indian Waters Pub:ic 5.9 ESE Water Supply Cl3 Mouth of Intake Canal 3.4 WSW C14H Head of Discharge Canal 0.1 NW C14M Midway out Discharge Canal 1.5 W Cl4G Gulf of Mexico end of 2.8 W Discharge Canal C15 Withlacoochee River 5.0 N Yankeetown Dock Isaac Walton Lodge C18 Yankeetown City Well 5.2 N C19 NW Corner State Road 8.5 ENE 488 and State Road 495 C26 FPC Substations on State Road 16.6 E 491 between Beverly Hills and ,

Holder

TABLE I-2 Operational Sample Station Locations (Cont'd)

Station Distance From Distance From Number Location Plant (miles) Plant C27 Ralston Purina Research 0.6 WNW Facility between Intake and Discharge Canals C29 Discharge Area 2.0 W C30(a) Intake Area 3.6 WSW C40 On site near N.E. Deundary 3.5 E at excavated pond and pump station C41 Onsite meteorological 0.4 SSW C43 S.E. corner Hollinwood 4.7 ESE C45 Between C40 and C46 NA NA C46 North Pump Station 0.4 N

C47 Univ. of Fla., Gainesville 52.0 NNE C48 To be determined from Annual Vegetable Garden Census C49 To be determined from Semlannual Milk Animal Census (a) This station is considered as background station for marine sampling.

b II. MILE AND GREEN LEAFT VEGETABLES CENSUS Environmental Technical Specification 3.2.1 requires a census of animals producing milk for human consumption to be conducted semiannually. If this census fails to locate any such animals, a census of gardens produc-

.ing fresh leafy vegetables for human' consumption is required annually.

The garden census, required as . a result of a lack of findings on the milk animal census, was completed on March 23 and 25, 1983. Eight (8) garden sites within five miles of the plant were located. A garden 4.1 miles east of the plant was chosen as the critical location based on FSAR historical meteorological data.

The first semiannual milk cow survey was initiated on March 23 and 25, 1983, and inquiries completed in June, with only one milk producing goat located at the five mile radius north of the plant. The resident was unwilling to provide milk for routine analysis.

The second semiannual milk animal survey was performed on December 21 and 22, 1983, and no -milk cows or goats were located within five miles of the plant.

4

+

r 1

1 d

l

.9

4 III. MEDIA OTHER THAN RITREFAL RADIATION This category includes all sampica of the food chain pathway other than External Radiation as depicted in ' Figure I-1. The samples are collected and analyzed in accordance with Crystal River Unit 3 Environmental Techni-cal Specifications, Section 3.2.2. Each pathway analyzed is presented in . this section by data summaries, data comparisons, and plots in order to document in easily usable form the effects of effluent releases from Crystal River Unit 3 on the surrounding environment.

Each pathway summary contains a brief narrative, two tables, and, as appropriate, a trend plot of the nuclidea of interest. The first table provides a summary of each pathway data formatted as required by Section 5.6.1. A o f Environmental Technical Specifications. The second table provides a comparison of required reporting levels to the analytical data as required by Section 5.6.2.C(2) for critical pathway samples as well as general pathway samples. The nuclide trends were - developed from the means of all locations for each parameter analyzed from 1977 to 1983. The limits for comparison of highest single value for each pathway were calculated as described in the tables. Where no preopera-tional data were available, a control station was used, and where no control station existed, preoperation data were used for the limits.

j l

l l

l l _

10 -

t 9

AIR IMRALATION PATHUAY The Air Inhalation Pathway is one of two pathways split between the University and the State. In addition to the assigned stations, the University operates a station at C47 (Gainesville, FL).

Weekly Cross Beta Analysis Two (2) . weekly gross beta samples were not collected and analyzed, and the '

following discrepancies noted:

- C40 for week of March 8, 1983:

Power outage during sample interval.

- C40 for week of April 4,1983:

No sample due to power outage.

- C41 for week of December 4,1983:

Sample collection exceeded collection interval date.

- C47 for weeks of February 7 and August 29, 1983:

Sample collection exceeded allowable interval.

- C47 for week of September 23, 1983:

No sample due to power outage.

There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

The operational concentrations are similar to the preoperational concentrations and consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

Weekly I-131 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. Station C41 is the critical station for this type of analysis. Station C47, the control station in Gainesville, had the highest single.value and mean (Table III-1). Station C41 had a single value in excess of preoperational limits, but less than the control location.

The following discrepancies were noted:

- C41 for week of December 4 1983:

Sample collection exceeded schedule interval. *-

- C47 for weeks of February 7 and August 29, 1983:

Sample collection exceeded schedule interval.

- C47 for week of September 23, 1983:

No sample due-to power outage.

The LLD for the DHRS stations is determined by counting weekly composites of all stations (six in number) with a composite sample ' LLD equal to 0.012 pci/m3. If I-131 is detected, an individual cartridge recount is performed.

l DHRS now - counts the cartridges using GeLi spectroscopy.- The reported LLD 4

is not'an average system. capability, but rather an upper 95 percentile value of system capabilities based on standard sairple analysis procedures. The original Technical Specification LLD's were based on an average Na1 system capability.

Quarterly Ganuna Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1983 were generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with all previous operational years' concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis All samples were collected. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

There are no preoperational data and all operational concentrations are consis-tent with historical operational data.

e

- 11a -

TABLE III-l ENV1kONhENTAL kADI0 LOGICAL MONITORING PkOGRAM SUhhARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITkUS COUNTY, FL0kIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/03-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTkOL LOCATION ANRk AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 4 A A A A A A AIk INHALATION A GROSS B 416A A A A A &

A A A A A A A A A 0.008A0.016( 403/ 414)AC46 A0.018( 51/ 52)AO.017( 351/ 362)A 0

& A A (0.002-0.048)A A (0.010-0.029)A (0.004-0.049)A PATHWAY .A TIPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAt

A A A A A A AIR INHALATION A 10 DINE 416A A A A A A

, 4 A A A A A A A A 0.059A0.154( 8/ 415)AC47 A0.160( 4/ 51)AO.160(

4/ 363)A3It

[ 4 A A (0.015-0.2263* A (0.041-0.226)A (0.041-0.226)A PATHWAY A TYl'E I NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIDHS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANJtR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A AIR PARTICULATEA A A A A A A (PCI/M3) A Sk 89/90 A A A A A A INHALATION A ANALYSIS 32 A A A A p

A A 4 A A A A A A A A A A A A A

+ SR-90 A 0.001A 5.24E-04( 3/ 32 7 AC47 A 9.70E-04( 1/ 4)A 9.70E-04( 1/ 28)A A A A 2.1E 9.7E-04A A 9.7E 9.7E-04A 9.7E 9.7E-04A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 SR-89 A 0.001A 9.26E-04( 2/ 31 ) AC47 A 1.44E-03( 1/ 4)A 1.44E-03( 3/ 28)A A A A 4.1E 1.4E-03A A 1.4E 1.4E-03A 1.4E 1.4E-03A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

TABLE III-l (Cont 'd)

ENVIRONhEHIAL RADIOLOGICAL Mu!!!TORING PkOGkAM SUMMAFs CHfb7AL klVEk UNIT 3 DUCi;ET-NO.50-302 CIIkUS CouttII, ELuk1DA REP 0kTlHG PERIOD 01/01/83-12/J1/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTE 0L LOCATION ANBA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

-A A A A A A A AIR PART. A A A A A A A (PCI/1000 M3) A GAMMA A A A A A A AIk INHALATION A ANALYSIS 32 A A A A A A7 A A A' A A A A A A A A A A A A CE-144 A 48.03A ND( 0/ 32)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 9.25A 50.00( 2/ 32)AC41 A 50.00( 2/ 4)A ND ( 0/ 28)A g A A = ( 20.00- 80.003A A ( 20.00- 80.00)A A A A A A A A , A P' A TH-232 A 15.10A 1.23( 8/ 32)AC47 A 1.25( 4/ 4)A 1.25( 4/ 28)A

" 1.00- 2.00)A A A A ( 0.80- 2.00)A A ( ( 1.00- 2.00l*

I A A A A A A A

I-131 A 14.22A ND( 0/ 32)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

' RA-326 A 30.10A 1.39( 7/ 32)AC41 A 1.45( 4/ 4)A 1.30( 3/ 28)A A A A ( 0.90- 3.00)A A ( 0.90- 3.00)A ( 0.90- 2.00)A A A A A A A A A RU-106 A 37.97A ND( 0/ 32)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 7.61A 0.30( 2/ 32)AC47 A 0.40( 1/ 4)A 0.40( 1/ 28)A A A A ( 0.20- 0.40)A A ( 0.40- 0.40)A ( 0.40- 0.40)A A A ~A A A A A A ZR-95 A 7.60A ND( 0/ 32)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

MN-54 A 7.47A ND( 0/ 311A A .

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

. A ZN-65 A 15.11A ND( 0/ 32)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A K-40 A 83.06A 7.13( 32)AC47 A 8.00( 4/ 4)A 8.00( 8/ 28)A A A A ( 6.00- 9.00)A A ( 6.00- 9.00)A ( 6 00- S.00)k

TABLE 15-2 AIR INHALATION Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pcl/m3) (pci/m3)

I-131** all 0.154 416 0.059 ---

C41** --

1 0.008 0.224 0.040 s

preop C47 -- 1 0.015 0.226 0.040 Preop Gross Beta all 0.016 416 0.008 --

C41** --

1 0.02 0.028 1.20 preop C40 -- 1 0.01 0.048 1.20 Preop Sr 89 all < LLD 32 0.0016 <LLD --

C41** -- 1 0.002 < LLD Sr 90 all < LLD 32 0.0008 <LLD C41** --

1 0.001 <LLD

}

cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclide.

l l

l 1

l t

TABLE 15-2 (Continued)

AIR INHALATION Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pcl/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all <LLD 32 0.030 C41** 1 0.001 0.003 2.41/ preop C47 1 0.001 0.002 2.41/ preop Th 232 all <LLD 32 0,015 0.002 C41** 1 0.001 0.002 0.08/ preop I131** all <LLD 32 0.014 <LLD C41** -- 4 0.005 <LLD 0.04/ preop Ba 140 all 0.05 32 0.01 0.08 41** --

1 0.01 0.08 0.16/ preop Ru 106 all <LLD 32 0.038 <LLD --

C41 *

4 0.002 <LLD 2.16/ preop Cs 137 all < LLD 32 0,007 <LLD C41** -- 4 0.002 < LLD 0.13/ preop cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclide.

TABLE 15-2 (Continued)

AIR INHALATION Sampling No of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/m3) (pcl/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3)

Gamma Analysis Zr 95 all < LLD 32 0.008 < LLD C 41 * * --

4 0.001 < LLD 0.43/ preop Mn 54 all < LLD 32 0.008 < LLD C41 * * -- 4 0.001 < LLD 0.10/ preop Zn 65 all < LLD 32 0.015 < LLD C41** -

4 0.001 < LLD 0.10/ preop K 40 all 0.017 32 0.083 0.009 C41** 1- 0.001 0.007 1.10/ preop cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence.value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

i (f

.f

1_

J:'". s FI N III-li !

, 1 -

, 1 AIR INEALATION NUCLTDE: TRENDS-~

~

. l

= .. - - . _ - - - - -- .

- : --^ . . - . - - - - .

_a

- .p.-._ _ f :-.;a 7 . - . ;

. ~. _ L u ._ ..

10-1

(

, D I-I3I ,

E W

U Q. [

10 2

A

& $r0K Ct%

m . te me- e.eme.n.--

~----n. - . .

, .i.w- r s s p.

_c ; 3 ,

. ,, yo l

+ ,

, m i- r 2 i .

197'7 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 v

5'O .L FIGURE-III-2!

'. l

_e _

~~'~ AIR ~INHAEATIONTNUCLIDE TRENDS - -

i i 4__ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ ._ _ - _ _ _ . _ - - - - -

3 3_ _

.__._.,_._,_.__L.---. - -- - - - - - - - - -:

. _ _ _ ._ _L '

+ + +

i,_ _ . _ _L. ._ _ . _ _ _ . - _ - - _ _ - - - - . . -_ - - - -- -- --- - - - - - ---- J

.- - - - ~ . . - - - - - . -

10 1

-me

. y eg y

-() ade A. AJ C4 n[~ \ &sM-

~

.R

\ : , - --<3/-' ,

/ *'-

,,n bY i

s' s' e

[

10-s

( . -

.p.m.. e +

_w - aA-eee<- -*+m%.d e mW +e6 4 4- ++mww- p***+4D .=ir *=- *Rw*'***

10-4

g. .

h

.. _ _ _ _ _ . _ L_ ____._._. _ _. __

~~' '

!~ _

.. [ . ~~J

,3 977 1978 1979 1980 19'81 1982 1983 18 -

I PRECIPITATION PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and. analyze precipitation samples.

There are no additional stations for the pathway.

4 Monthly Gamma Analysis-All monthly samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1983 operational activities of the nuclides determined by gamma analysis were non-detectable as were the preoperational and all operational activities to date.

Monthly Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in

., this pathway.

1 All of the 1983 operational activity data for tritium were less than the LLD's.

No trend plots of the precipitation pathway are provided due to the lack of variation in the data. Since 1977, all of the monthly gamma analyses and tritium analyses have been less than the LLD.

h

! f h

4 i- .

, r

TABLE III-3 .

l'NVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITCRING PROGRAM SUMMAP)

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-303 CITkUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERICD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST HEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANNA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAh

& A A A A A A PRECIPITATION A A A A A A 4 (PCI/L ) A GAMMA A A A A A A FOOD CHAIN A ANALYSIS 36 A A A A A A O

A A A A A A A A A A A A A &

4 BA-140 A 17.0A HD( 0/ 33)A A A A A A A A A A 4 4 4 A A A A A A I-131 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 33)A A A 4 4 A A A A A A A A A A A A e

+ CS-134 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 33)A A A A A A A A A A 4 g & A A A A A A A CS-137 A 17.OA NDt 0/ 33)A A A &

y A A A A

A A

A A A A

4 I A CO-58 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 33)A A A

A A A A A A 4 4 A A A A A A A MN-54 A 15.0A ND( 0/ 33)A 'A A 4 4 4 A A A A e

~

A A A A A A 4 4 2N-65 4 30.0A ND( 0/ 33)A A A A A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A A 4 CO-60 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 33)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGNEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANR4 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA44 4 A A A A A 4 PRECIPITATION A A A A A A 4 (PCI/L ) A TRITIUM A A A A A A A ANALYSIS 36 A A A A A A O

& A A A A A A A A A A A A A A H-3 A 300.0A ND ( 0/ 33)A A A A A A A A A A e

A A A A A A b

8-TABLE I5-4 PRECIPITATION l Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/1) (pcl/1) (pcl!!) (pci/l)

Gamma Analysis I 131 all <LLD 36 17 < LLD 170/ preop Bn 140 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Cs 137 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Cs 134 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Co 58 all <LLD 36 17 < LLD 170/ preop Mn54 all <LLD 36 15 <LLD 150/ preop Zn 65 - all <LLD 36 30 <LLD 300/ preop Co 60 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Tritium all <LLD 36 200 <LLD 2000/ preop l

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value-from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associate.d with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit. ,

9 t

SEAWATER PATIBfAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze seawater samples.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Camma Analysis All monthly samples'were collected and analyzed.

Sample Station C14C is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the preoperational or control station values.

The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1983 were consistent with preoperational and operational concentrations for previous years.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis All ~ samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The concentrations observed in 1983 were consistent with preoperational and previous operational concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. Sr-89 and'90 are not critical nuclides in this pathway, There are no preoperational data. The 1983 Sr-89 and 90 concentrations are consistent with those of previous operational years.

TABLE III-5 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL H0HITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCHET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, EL0kIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANAR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A A A A A SEA WATER A A A A A (PCI/HG) A GAMMA A A A A SUBMERSION A ANALYSIS 72 A A A A A A0 A A A A A A A

A A A A A A 4 A BA-140 A 4.9A 21.0( 11/ 72)AC14HA 41.0( 2/ 12)A 25.7( 8/ 60)A A A A ( 4.6- 75.3)A A ( 6.6- 75.3)A ( 6.6- 75.3)A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 5.1A 15.S( 69/ 72)AC13 A 16.6( 12/ 12)* 15.6( 50/ 6034 A A A ( 7.2- 31.8)A A ( 11.8- 24.2)A ( 7.2- 31.87A A A A A A 4 A

A 1-131 A 2.8A 2.2( 1/ 72)AC01 A 2.2( 1/ 12)A 2.2( 1/ 60)A

( 2.2- 2.2)A A ( 2.2- 2.2)A ( 2.2- 2.2)A U A A A

A A A A A A A

A FA-226 A 5.2A 22.9( 69/ 72)AC09 A 30.1( 12/ 12)A 24.2( 57/ 60s4 A A A ( 5.8- 88.5)A A ( 9.0- 46.3)A ( 5.8- 88.5)A A A A A A A A

A CS-134 A 2.3A 2.9( 2/ 71)AC14MA 3.7( 1/ 12)A 2.9( 2/ $9)A A A A ( 2.1- 3.7)A A ( 3.7- 3.7)A ( 2.1- 3.7)A A A A A A A A

A -RU-106 A 21.1A 13.4( 1/ 72)AC14GA 13.4( 1/ 12)A ND ( 0/ 60)A A A A ( 13.4- 13.4)A A ( 13.4- 13.4)A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 2.6A 4.0( 14/ 72)AC01 A 9.0( 1/ 12)A 4.0( 14/ 60)A A A A ( 2.3- 9.0)A A ( 9.0- 9.0)A ( 2.3- 9.0)A A A A A A 4 4 A ZR-95 A 2.4A 4.4( 5/ 72)AC14GA 7.5( 2/ 12)A 2.3( 3/ 60)*

A A A ( 1.9- 11.3)A A ( 3.7- 11.3)A ( 1.9- 3.1)A A A A A A A A 4 MN-54 A 2.2A 4.2( 2/ 72)AC14MA 4.3( 1/ 12)A 4.2( 2/ 60)A A A A ( 4.0- 4.3)A A ( 4.3- 4.3)A ( 4.0- 4.3)A A A A A A A A

72)A A 4 A ZH-65 A 4.9A ND( 0/ A A A A A 4- A A A A A A

.A A A 71/ 72)AC14MA 203.3( 59/ 60)A A H-40 A 33.2A 237.2( 12/ 12)A 234.8(

A A A ( 50.2 - 475.0) A A ( 204.9- 353.0)A ( 50.2- 475.0)4 A A A A A A A

. -- - N

TABLE III-5 (Cont'd)

ENVIRONMENTAL kADI0 LOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVEk UNIT 3 DOCHET NU.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY ~ A TYPE 1 30. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR

.AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A- A A A A A A SEA WATER A A A A A A 4 (PC1/KG) A TRITIUM A A A A A A A ANALYSIS 24 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A H-3 A 527.0A 753.0( 2/ 24)AC01 A 926.0( 1/ 4)A 753.0( 2/ 20)A A A A ( 580.0- 926.0)A A ( 926.0- 926.0)A ( 580.0- 926.034 A A A .A A A A A A A A A A 4

' ' PATHWAY A TYPE I NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANkR

' hJ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

A A A A A A SEA WATER A A A A A A A (PC1/L ) A SR 89/90 A A A A A A SUBMERSIDH A ANALYSIS 24 A A A A A A g A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A SR-90 A 0.357A 7.41E-01( 11/ 24)AC09 A 1.09E+00( 3/ 4)A 7.45E-01( 10/ 20)A A A A 2.3E 2.3E+00A A 3.1E 2.3E+00A 2.3E 2.3E+00A A A A A A A A

, A A A A A A A A SR-89 .A 0.893A 1.97E+00( 4/ 24)AC09 A 3.24E+00( 1/ 4)A 2.16E+00( 3/ 20)A A A A. 1.2E+00- 3.2E+00A A 3.2E+00- 3.2E+00A 1.2E+00- 3.2E+00A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

I TABLE III-6 l SEA WATER Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all 22.9 72 5.2 __

Cl4G** ---

1 9.0 37.0 398/Ci3 C01 --

1 6.0 88.6 398/Cl3 Th 232 all 15.5 72 5.1 --

Cl4G** 1 4.0 22.0 70/ preop

~

C09 1 10.0 31.8 70/ preop I131** all <LLD 72 2.8 Cl4G** --

12 5.0 <LLD 85/Cl3 C01-- 1 2.0 2.2 85/Cl3 Ba 140 all 21.0 72 4.9 C14G** 1 4.0 16.0 110/ preop

u. Cl4H I 6.0 75.3 Il0/ preop Ru 106 all <LLD 72 21.1 --

C14 G * * --

1 12.0 13.-4 358/Cl3 Cs 137** all 4.0 72 2.6 C14G** 1 4.0 <LLD 48/Cl3 C01 --

1 4.0 9.0 48/C13 Zr 95 all 4.4 72 2.4 C14G** 1 4.0 11.3 43/Cl3 cDefined as either (1)- 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

l OcCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l - _ . _ _ _ .

TABLE 15-6 SEA WATER Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis (Con't)

Cs 134** all 2.9 72 2.3 C14G * * ---

1 4.0 LLD 67/Cl3 C14M I 2.0 4.0 67/Cl3 Mn 54 all 4.2 72 2.2 --

C14G*

12 3.0 <LLD 39/Cl3 Cl4M- --

^

1 3.0 4.0 39/Cl3 Zn 65 all <LLD 72 4.9 Cl4G** 12 8. 0. <LLD 93/Cl3 K 40 all 237 72 33.2 --

C14G** 1 54.0 299 3970/Cl3 Cl4H 1 20.0 475 3970/Cl3 Tritium all 753 24 527 -- --

C14G** 1 566 LLD 870/ preop C01 1 538 926 870/ preop Sr 89 all 1.97 24 -0.89 -- _

C14G** 1 0.99 1.40 13/Cl3 C09 --

1 0.94 3.20 13/Cl3 Sr 90 'all 0.74 24 - 0.36 --

C14G *

1 0.30 0.70 10/Cl3

.C09 --

1 0.77 2.30 10/Cl3 CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational irogram or operating station used to calculate limit, ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

26 --

T

=d"

C 2 !E _ ._ _ ____ _____ __FIm_m v III-3! -

~

. 3 _ _- -

SEAWATER-NUCLIDE-TRENDS m l

~ - -_ -- -

. . - . . _ _ - - . ~ -- . - - - - - - - - n-

~

- A /06 k .

10 1 4- ,

f N

K

.c.

W-~ * %%B" a w - , ,,. ,,

t s 4e a fY 10 0 <

h

[

e 89 + Sr - 90 c,y m,- e+.- . m,-.

e + w v.w..-o' vu w- +~- man.e- m w-.Ee we eggs. <n- . r-e.+wae'-- mmmea-9we.p *me.m*f s . M-hn. -em1 .-w.=e'm = = - -

-- vm+ . .*.p=n, eh-*, .- -+ e m. - e-a-..a.me- .e-a n - ..w- ,

.{ is77- 1778 1979 1980 1981 19'82 1983 l -

27 -

RIVER WATER PATHWAY j The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze river water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Quarterly Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLD's.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLD's.

No trend plots of the river water pathway are provided due to the lack of variation in the data. Since 1977, all of the quarterly gamma and tritium analyses have been less than LLD.

t

TABLE III-7 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMMAkV CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No.50-302 CITkUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTkUL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA44 4 A A A A A A RIVER WATEk A A A A A A 4 (PCI/L ) A GAMMA A A A A A 6-INGESTION A ANALYSIS 4 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A

& BA-140 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A A A I-131 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A 4

& A A A A A A 4 A A A A A 4 6 CS-134 A 17.0A' ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A 4 i A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A

$ + A A A A 4 4 A A A A A A 4 I CO-58 A A 17.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A A A MN-54 A 15.0A ND(- O/ 4)A A A 4 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZN-65 A 30.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A 4 4 A A A A A A A CO-60 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA'Ad A A A A A A A kIVER WATER A A A A A A A (PCI/L ) A TNITIUM A A A A. A A A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A O A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A H-3 A 200.0A (LLD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

TABLE 15-8 RIVER WATER Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis I131 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Ba 140 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD

! Co 58 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Cs 137 all <LLD- 4 17 < LLD Cs 134 . all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Mu 54 all . <LLD 4 15 <LLD --

Zn 65 all < LL D 4 30 <LLD Co 60 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD --

1 Tritium all <LLD 4 200 <LLD 1

i

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

l

)

GROUND WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze ground water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. All operational samples had no detectable activity (except for naturally occurring isotopes) and there are no preoperational data.

Semiannual Tritium Analysis There are no critical stations in this pathway. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there are no preoperational data.

l 1

l

TABLE III-9 ,

ENVIkONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVEk UNIT 3 DOCHET NO.50-302 CITkUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION Ah4R AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD A A A A A A A GROUND WATEk A A A A A A A (PCI/L ) A GAMMA A A A A. A AO INGESTION .A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A *A A A A BA-140 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A &

4 I-131 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A 4 6 A A A A A 4 A A A A A A 4 A CS-134 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A 4 1 A A A ,

A A A A A CS-137 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A 4 w

to A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4

' A CD-58 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A A A MH-54 A 15.0A HD( 0/ 2)A A A 4 A *. A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2N-65 A 30.0A HD( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CD-60 A 17.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTkOL LOCATION ANk2 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A GROUND WATER A A A A A A &

(PCI/L ) A TRITIUM A A A A A A O

A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A

4 A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A H-3 A 200.0A <LLD(' 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

\

I TABLE IH-10 GROUND WATER Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis I 131 all <LLD 2 17 <LLD Ba 140 all <LLD 2 17 <LLD Co58 all <LLD 2 17 <LLD Cs 137 all <LLD 2 17 <LLD Cs 134 all <LLD 2 17 <LLD Mu54 all <LLD 2 15 <LLD Zn 65 all <LLD 2 30 <LLD Co 60 all <LLD 2 17 <LLD --

Tritium all <LLD 2 200 <LLD --

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational i program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

POTABLE WATER PATIBi&Y i

The University has the responsibility _ to collect and analyze potable water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway. i

~ Quarterly Gamma Analysis All . samples were collected' and analyzed. . There are no critical. stations in this pathway. The 1983 operational activity was generally less than the pre-operational activity levels and consistent with previous operational years' activities.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. All sample activities were less than the LLD.

i i

, - - . - .. a -_ m-- --- , . . , -

TABLE III-ll .

ENVIRONMENTAL kADIOLOGICAI. MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CkfSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No.50-303 CITkUS COUNT), ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRG AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA6 A A A A A A A

.JTABLE WATEk A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA ,A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 12 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 6.7A 27.1( 3/ 13)AC10 A 63.5( 1/ 4)A 37.1( 3/ 13)A A A A ( 7.8- 63.5)A A ( 63.5- 63.5)A ( 7.8- 63.5)A A A A A A A A i A I-131 A 2.9A 23.9( 2/ 12)AC07 A 27.3( 1/ 4)A 23.8( 2/ 12)A A A A ( 18.3- 27.3)A A ( 37.3- 37.3)A ( 18.2- 27.3)A A A A A A A A A CS-134 A 2.4A ND( 0/ 13)A A A A A A A A A A 4 I A A A A A 4 4 w A CS-137 A 2.9A 3.7( 1/ 13)AC18 A 3.7( 1/ 4)A 3.7( 1/ 12)A on A A A ( 3.7- 3.7)A A ( 3.7- 3.7)A ( 3.7- 3.7)A A A A A A A A I A CO-58 A 3.3A ND( 0/ 13)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MN-54 A 2.2A ND( 0/- 12)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A 2N-65 A 6.3A ND( 0/ 13)A A A A A A A A A A 4 4 A A A A A A A CO-60 A 2.2A 4.5( 1/ 12)AC10 A 4.5( 1/ 4)A 4.5( 1/ 12)A A A A ( 4.5- 4.51A A ( 4.5- 4.5)A ( 4.5- 4.5)A A A A A A A 4 PATHWAY 'A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

< A A A A A A A PDTABLE WATEk A A A A A A 4 (PCI/L ) A TRITIUM A A A A A A A ANALYSIS 12 A A A A A A 0

. A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A H-3 A 450.8A 273.0( 1/ 12)AC18 A 273.0( 1/ 4)A 273.0( 1/ 12)A A A A ( 273.0- 273.0)A A ( 273.0- 273.0)A ( 273.0- 273.0)*

A A A A A A A j A A A A A A A 1

a TABLE 15-12 POTABLE WATER Sampling No. of Highest Limit *

. Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis

^

l131 all 22.8 12 2.9 --

C07 1 2.0 27.3 100/ preop Ba 140 all 27.1 12 6.7 --- ---

C10 --

1 6.0 63.5 500/ preop Cs 137 all 3.7 12 2.9 C18 1 3.0 3.7 200/ preop Cs 134 all 2.4 12 2.4 <LLD 150/ preop Co58 all <LLD 12. 2.2 <LLD 150/ preop Mu 54 all <LLD 12 2.2 <LLD 200/ preop Zn 65 all <LLD 12 6.2 <LLD 200/ preop

, Co 60 all 4.5 12 2.2 C10 I 3.0 4.5 200/ preop P

. Tritium all <LLD 12 451 --- ---

C18 ---

1 211 273 12000/ preop CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence. value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

t i

2

4

...~... ,

,:2.a4 5 i FIGURE _III-4! .

l l t ,

POTABLE ~ WATER NUCLIDE TRENDS-

,i j .

i s

1 5 _ . . ., _ , . . _ _ _ . . - . . -- - . $

-.-_.____-1..

M-3 e

10 2 eo 4

w o

C.

C 10 1

(

O s /WO a

Cc IM n SS

-.1 ~ . . . . .

/

~ ~ U s

^

~] % s ceso c

n,. .,, _. 7_ -

Cr.g/J Py ._ -

_ _ _ t- __. _.. ._. _ _ . .

8 10 .- . . . . - . .. . .- . ._. - . -.-.. - -

upe -er- c ..w_--.we.se <e..3*%e.s> .an.rs. .e_ e.eww c-., ,aw-.-e -m-- , .ceeean. wmew .

.we-e=. ,m %s--. ,4 .w.-- pwe .- we . pm e .m.-. --.em-,me.-ee we -m .=

g = - ,

4- h.

~

1977 1978 19'79 19'80 1981 1982 1983 37 -

SHORELINE EXTEREAT. SEDIMNT PATIRfAY The University has the responsibility _to collect and analyze shoreline external sediment namples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Samma Analysis

- All sampic s were collected and analyzed. The critical stations for this analy-sis are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G. No sample had activity. greater than 10 times the control station value.

The 1983 operational data showed nuclide concentrations generally lower than t the preoperational data and consistent with previous years' operational data.

Semian wal Se-90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical stations are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G. No sample had activity greater than 10 times

. -the control station value.

There are no preoperational data and the 1983 data showed no significant change in Sr-90 concet.cration, in this pathway, over previous years' concentrations.

~

e e

s 4

TABLE III-13 ENVikONMENTAL kAD10 LOGICAL MUNITuk1NG PROGRAM SUMMakY -

CliYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. ELORIDA REP 0kTING PEkIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANNA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

'A A A A A A A BOT. SEDIMENTS A A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A GAMMA A A A A A A SHORELINE EXP. A ANALYSIS 10. A A A A A A0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 7.3A 17.1( 6/ 10)AC01 A 24.8( 1/ 2)A 18.6( 2/ 4)A A A A ( 12.4- 24.8)A A ( 24.8- 24.8)A ( 12.4- 24.8)A A A A A A A. A A TH-232 A 8.4A 89.7( 9/ 10)AC14HA 140.5( 2/ 2)A 81.0( 4/ 4)A A A A ( 39.9- 175.0)A A ( 106.0- 175.0)A ( 40.8- 133.0)A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 3.9A ND( 0/ 10)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A RA-326 A 8.2A 495.3( 10/ 10)AC14HA 926.5( 2/ 2)A 202.1( 4/ 4)*

g A A A ( 80.9-1130.0)A A ( 723.0-1130.0)A ( 80.9- 347.0)A A A A A A A A

$ A CS-134 A 3.1A 5.1( 6/ 10)AC14HA 10.7( 1/ 2)A 3.9( 3/ 4)A A A A ( 2.6- 10.7)A A ( 10.7- 10 a?54 ( ,2.b: 5.6)*

I A A A A a A A A RU-106 A 24.6A 21.7( 1/ 10)AC14MA 21.7( 1/ 2)A 'ND ( 0/ 4)A A A A ( 21.7- 21.7)A A 't '21.7- 21.7)A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 3.5A 22.9( 7/ 10)AC01 A 41.9( 2/ 2)A 36.8( 3/ 4)A A A A ( 4.1- 79.0)A A ( 4.8- 79.0)A ( 4.8- 79.034 A A A A A A A A ZR-95 A 4.0A ND( 0/ 10)A A A A

,. _A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MN-54 A 2.9A ND( 0/ 10)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZH-65 A 6.4A NDt 0/ 10)A A A A A A A A. A A A A A .A A A A A A K-40 A 38.6A 289.7( 9/ 10)AC09 A 364.5( 2/ 2)A 363.0( 4/ 4)A A A A ( 51.1- 678.0)A A ( 51.1- 678.0)A ( 51.1- 678.0)A BOTTOM SED. A A A . . , A A A *

(PCI/MG) A SR 89/90 A A A A A A SHORELINE EXT A ANALYSIS 10 A A A A A A 0 4 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A SR-90 A 23.3A 3.5( 3/ 10 SAC 09 A 6.2( 1/ 2)A 6.3( 1/ 4)A A A A ( 2.0- 6.2)A A ( 6.2- 6.2)A ( 6.2- 6.2n*

TABLE 15-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter - Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all- 495 10 8.2 1130 C14H *

1 11.0 1130 4695/C09 C14M *

1 16.0 620 4695/C09 C 14 G *

1 5.0 610 4695/C09 Th 232- all 89.7 10 8.4 175 --

C 14H *

1 13 175 1466/C09 C 14M *

1 6.0 85 1466/C09 C14G** -- 1 8.0 78 1466/C09 1 131 M1 < LLD 10 3.9 <LLD C14H * * --

2 7.0 <LLD 67/C09 C14M * * --

2 4.0 <LLD 67/C09 C14G *

2 3.0 <LLD 67/C09

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational-program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

1

9 TABLE 1H-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) -(pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis (corft)

Ba 140 all 17.1 10 7.3 ---

C14H * * -- 2 10.0 21.0 173/C09 C14M * * -- 2 6.0 13.0 173/C09 C14G** ---

2 5.0 19.0 173/C09 C01 --

1 10.0 24.8 173/C09 Ru 106 all <LLD 10 24.6 <LLD C14H * * --

2 55.0 <LLD 362/C09 C 14M *

1 20.0 21.7 362/C09 C14G * * ---

2 23.0 <LLD 362/C09 Cs 137** all 22.9 10 3.5 ---

C14H *

1 8.0 15.0 500/C09 Cl4M** 1 3.0 22.0 500/C09 C14G * * --

1 3.0 4.0 500/C09 COI 1 5.0 79.0 500/C09 Zr 95 all <LLD 10 4.0 ---

C14H** -- 2 9.0 <LLD 67/C09 C14M * * --

2 3.0 <LLD 67/C09 C14G * * --

2 4.0 <LLD 67/C09 cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

TABLE I5-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS i l

Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pel/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pel/kg)

Gamma Analysis (con't)

Cs 134** all 5.1 10 3.1 10.7 --

C14H * * --

1 4.0 10.7 30/C09 C14M *

1 2.0 5.0 30/C09 C14 G *

1 2.0 3.0 30/C09 Mn54 all <LLD 10 2.9 < LLD Cl4H * * -- 2 7.0 <LLD 48/C09 Cl4M** -- 2 2.0 <LLD 48/C09 i Cl4G** 2 3.0 <LLD 48/C09 Zn 65 all <LLD 10 6.4 <LLD Cl4H** ---

2 17.0 <LLD 133/C09 C14M * * --

2 4.0 <LLD 133/C09 C14G * * ---

2 5.0 <LLD 133/C09 i

CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ooCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

1

a TABLE 15-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pel/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis (con't)

K 40 all 289.7 10 38.6 678 --

C14H** ----

1 39.0 255 12335 /C09 C14M * * --

1 19.0 313 12335 /C09 C14G** -- 1 23.0 243 12335 /C09 C09 --

1 71.0 678 12335 /C09 Sr 90 all <LLD 10 23.3 6.2 C14H** 1 2.1 2.1 ll28/C09 C14M *

2 37.9 <LLD ll28/C09 C14G** -- 1 0.2 2.0 ll28/C09 cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides. ,

r -- y

.=b. .". ,

'f'** l' i

FIGURE-III-5l !

, t _4

~~~ SHORELINE ~EXTERNAI; SEDIMENTS ~NUCLIDE TRENDS ~~~;

4 i= _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ - . __ _

-.h. ~..y.- _

_,%. . gm .-- %- .+wmm- w-

m. m m.. e + <wo-a.==,oaenm-pp e+

'w=. a e-2 10 .

,_,,g N .

M 4fo 00

( (( -~

$c.

^

<g _

b 1

10 .

Ru 406 ThASA b . r i

'4 C JM -

3 /

-P z _.e.

N 9< .. . . .

(, - . - - . . .ist_e 43 10' - -- . - - - - -. - _ _ _ -

b -----4-h - - - , ,a m.m. %m e as t e- - ,

!_ - ^

1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983

c ,

SEAFOOD CHAIN PATBWAY (MARIls PLANTS)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze marine plants in the seafood chain. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual'Camma Analysis All sampics were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1983 operational concentrations are generally less than the preoperational concentrations and are consistent with previous operational years' concentra-tions.

Semiannual Sr-89 and 90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. There are no preoperational data and the 1983 data are consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

The following discrepancies were noted:

- C29 Second Half 1983: The small sample size and long holding time resulted in large sample LLD.

- C30 First Half 1983 : The small sample size and long' holding time resulted in large sample LLD.

TA131.-. III-15 -

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 -

CITkUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION AMRA A A A A A A A A A AA A A A A A A A A AAA A A A AA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MARINE PLANTS A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A A A SEAE00D CHAIN A ANALYSIS 4A A A A 'A A A A gy A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 9.8A 30.2( 3/- 4)AC30 A 35.3( 1/ 2)A 35.3( 1/ 2)A A A A ( 25.1- 35.3)A A ( 35.3- 35.3)A ( 35.3- 35.3)A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 9.0A 54.3( 3/ 4)AC30 A 60.9( 1/ 2)A 60.9( 1/ 2)4 A A A ( 32.6- 69.3)A A ( 60.9- 60.9)A ( 60.9- 60.9)A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 5.8A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A

+ A A A A A A A RA-226 A 9.3A 86.0( 3/ 4)AC39 A 92.4f 2/ 2)A 73.0( 1/ 2)A A A A ( 31.9- 153.0)A A ( 31.9- 153.03A ( 73.0- 73.0)A A A A A A A A A RU-106 A 38.0A ND( 0/ ~4)A A A A A A A A A A A

$ A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 4.7A 11.9( 3/ 4)AC29 A 13,9( 2/ 2)A 1

A (

S.1( 1/ 334 A A 5.7- 22.0)A A ( 5.7- 22.0)A ( 8.1- 3.1)A A A A A A A A A ZR-95 A 4.6A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MNb54 A 4.3A 'ND( 0/ 4)A A A A.

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

+ ZN-65 A 10.3A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A K-40 A 57.3A 5046.7( 3/ 4)AC30 A 5240.0( 1/ 2)A 5240.0( 1/ 2)A A A A (1680.0-8220.0)A A (5240.0-5240.034 (5240.0-5240.0)A A A A A A A A MARINE PLANIS A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A SR 89/90 A A A A A A SEAE00D CHAIN A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A A A A- A A A A2 A A A A A A A A. SR-90 A 0.819A 2.2 ( 2/ 4) A c30 A 2.2 ( 2/ 2)

2.2 ( 2/ 2) A A A A (0.032 - 4.4) A A (0.032/ 4.4) A (0.032 - 4.4) A A A A A A A A A SR-89 A10.130A 3.6 ( 1/ 4) A C29 A 18.0( 1/ 2) A A A A A ( 3.6 - 3.6 ) A A (36.0 - 36.0) A A A A A A A A A

.. l l

TABLE 15-16 MARINE PLANTS Sampling - No. of _ Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD le Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) Sing (pcl /kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all 86.0 4 9.2 C29 1 10.0 15.3 1330/C30 Th 232 all 54.3 4 9.0 C29 1 13.0 69.3 1124/C30 1 131 all <LLD 4 5.8 <LLD 124/C30 Ba 140 all 30.2 4 9.8 --

C30 ---

1 5.0 35.3 545/C30 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 38.0 <LLD 757/C30 Cs 137 all 11.9 4 4.7 --

C29 --

1 5.0 22.0 124/C30 Zr 95 all <LLD 4 4.6 <LLD 95/C30

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's '

influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit. .

t l l

TABLE ID-16 (Con't)

MARINE PLANTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis (Con't)

Mn54 all <LLD 4 4.3 <LLD 95.4/CJO Zn 65 all <LLD 4 10.3 <LLD 248/C30 K 40 all 5047 4 57.3 --

c29 1 50.0 8220 26285/c30-Sr 89 all <LLD 4 10.1 <LLD ---

C29 ---

1 23.0 36.0 220/C30 Sr 90 all 2.2 4 0.82 --

C30 1 1.5 4.4 83/C30

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

l 7 1

"$*' l

'IJ h

i.[ (TKD,GVD} _

FICimR' TTT-O i- < 1 l

. .4_ 1__ --

7-

_ SEAFOOD -CHAIN-(MARINE-PLANTS h MUCLIDE-TREN [

- - ~ ~ -

% m % %,. . . . , . _. , -. . . . . - - . . _ = ~ _ - - -~e-- - - - - - - - -

c 2

10 eo -

4

s.226-

} <

ze is 3-Bs 10 1

\.

N' So 90 A

'T. a _ ._ . . .

r q

4

, ./

o ,-_. . . -

,,g.

+ .r, o y 4

1 10 ' __ . _

___q ._ __. .._ _

_...______.:.__._._..-. _. ..._..____2 _ . _ _ . _ _

f _.~: , . :: . _ . - _ -

l

_ f._ ^ - -

s.%.i ,4.!~19 7 7 1978 1979 1980 19B1 1982 19B 3 i.>u o suoih a n<n - .

~m IBGESTION PATIBi&Y (CRAB) ]

I The University has the ' responsibility _ to collect and analyze crabs. There are no additional' stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All . samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station or preoperational values.

The 1983 operationa1' concentrations are generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent'with previous years' operational concentrations.

)

~50.- I l

1

, ..s, - _ - - , . . - .

TABLE III-17 Env!20NHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONIT0k1NG PROGkAM SUHHARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCHET NO.50-303 CITRUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE.8 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANkk AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A CRABS A A A A A A 4 (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A 0 4 A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 4 BA-140 4 13.2A 16.1( 1/ 4)AC39 A 16.1( 1/ 2)A ND ( 0/ 2)A A A A ( 16.1- 16.1)A 'A ( 16.1- 16.1)A A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 12.0A 60.9( 3/ 4)AC29 A 62.0( 2/ 2)A 58.9( 1/ 214

.4 A A ( 58.9- 65.0)A A ( 58.9- 65.0)A ( 58.9- 58.9)A A A A A A A A I

I-131' 6.1A ND( 0/

A 4)A A A A m A A A A A A 4 H A A A A A A A

, A RA-226 A 13.4A 114.'0( 4/ 4)AC30 A 118.6( 2/ 2)A 118.6( 2/ 214 A A A ( 56.6- 162.0)A A ( 93.3- 145.0)A ( 92.2- 145.03A A A A A A A A A CS-134' A 5.5A 4.3( 1/ 4)AC29 A 4.3( 1/ 2)A ND ( 0/ 2)A A A A ( 4.3- 4.3)A A ( 4.3- 4.3)A A A A A A A A A

-A RU-106 A 50.0k . ND( 0/ 4)A A A 4 4 A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A CS-137 A 6.4A 10.6( 1/ 4)AC30 A 10.6( 1/ 2)A 10.6( 1/ 2)4 A A A ( 10.6- 10.6)A A ( 10.6- 10.6)A ( 10.6- 10.6)4

& A .A A A A A A 2R-95 A .6.6A NDi 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MN-54 A 5.5A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A 4 4 A A A A A A A ZN-65 A 13.4A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A

. A A A A A A A A A A A A .A A A K-40 4 167.4A 2340.4( 4/ 4)AC30 A 2530.7( 2/ 2)A 3530.7( 2/ 27A A A A (1930.0-2901,4)A A (2160.0-2901.4)A (2160.0-2901.474 A A A A A A A

TABLE 1H-18 CRABS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location . Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma

. Analysis Ra 226 -all 114 4 13.4 162 1920/c30 C29** 2 7.0 162 1920/c30 Th 232 all 60.9 4- 12.0 65 C29** 1 7.0 65 1015/c30

-I131** all <LLD 4 6.1 <LLD --

C29** 2 7.0 <LLD 125/c30 Ba 140 all 16.1 4 13.2 16.1 C29** 1 7.0 16.1 206/c30 ,

e Ru 106 all <LLD 4 50.0 <LLD --

C29** 2 57.0 <LLD 865/c30 l

D; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational prcgram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides, i

l l

-m

. l 1

TABLE 15-18 (Cont)

CRABS 1

Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean . Samples LLD Single Value Location l (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg)

Gamma Analysis (Con't) )

Cs 137** all 10.6 4 6.4 --- --

~

C29** 2 6.0 <LLD 145/C30 C30 ---

1 9.0 10.6 145/C30 Zr 95 all <LLD 4 6.6 <LLD C29 * * -

2 7.0 <LLD 80/C30 Cs 134** all <LLD 4 5.5 4.0 --

C29** --

1 3.0 4.0 79/C30 Mn54 all <LLD 4 5.5 <LLD ---

C29** --

2 6.0 <LLD 79/C30 Zn 65 all <LLD 4 13.4 <LLD C29** --

2 15.0 <LLD 205/C30 K 40 all 2340 4 167 --

C29* --

1 291 2370 35570/C30 C30 --

1 243 2901 35570/C30

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit, ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

V

...4. . .

FIGURE-III-7

~

2 ** __

' ~ ~~

Ame.wrtun rATHWAY-(CRKBSTNUCLIDFTRENDS-~~

'~ ~ ~ '

- . . . . ~ . - - - - - - -- -

__ - .~ w . . - - - -

g 10 3 . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . -

40 me .ws-10 2 _ __

(

Re.

(

)o < A

' g-106

(

( l

( . _ . ,

7A -

10 1 . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . .

G 38

~

, L, Er A sc n1"

. Th .t 3.1

, w-

_ __ JV

. - O #$

~

ma - -

na -

5,13,:g 10' . _ _ _ . . . . . . ~ - - . _ _ _ .

_7__.__ . . - . _ . - . .- . . _ _ _ .

. ... _ L ; .

t ' - - -

+ - ~ -

1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983

J IBGESTION PATEMAY (CARBIVOROUS FISR)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze carnivorous fish.

There are no additional stations for this-pathway.

Semiannual Ganuna Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed except for the - first half 1983 at

. C30. No~ carnivorous fish could be obtained. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station or preoperational values.

The operational concentrations for 1983 are generally less than the preopera-tional concentrations and consistent with previous years' operational concentra-tions.

l 4

+

,,n.- g ,

e-

TABLE III-19 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTf.L RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHsST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOC 4 TION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A 4 A A A &

CARN. FISH A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A 0 INGESTION A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A.

A BA-140 A 7.5A 29.0( 1/ 3)AC29 A 29.0( 1/ 3)A ND ( C/ 1)A A A A ( 29.0- 29.0)A E ( 29.0- 29.0)A A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 7.2A 49.0( 3/ 3)AC30 A 55.2( 1/ 1)A 55.2( 1, ))4 4 A A ( 20.4- 71.3)A A ( 55.2- 55.2)A ( 55.2- 55.2)n A A A A A A A 4 I-131 A 3.9A 33.6( 1/ 3)AC29 A 35.6( 1/ 2)A ND ( 0/ 1)A 35.6)A ( 35.6- 35.6)A A

( 35.6-

$ A A

A A

A A A A

A A A 8 A RA-326 A 8.6A 57.4( 3/ 3)AC29 A 71.2( 2/ 2)A 29.9( 1/ I)4 A A A ( 29.4- 113.03A A ( 29.4- 113.0)A i 29 9- 29.934 4 A A A A A A A A A CS-134 A 3.4A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A RU-los A 32.6A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A A A 4 CS-137 A 4.5A 18.8( 3/ 3)AC29 A 25.5( 3/ 3)A 5.3( 1/ 1)A A A A ( 5.3- 33.6)A A ( 17.4- 33.6)A ( 5.3- 5.334 A A A A A A A 3.9A 1/ 3)AC29 A 5.4( 1/ 2)A ND ( 0/ 134 ZR-95 A 5.4(

A A A A ( 5.4- 5.4)A A (' 5.4- 5.4)A A 4 A

A A A A A 3)A A A 4 4 MN-54 A 3.5A ND( 0/

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A ZN-65 A 8.2A NDt 0/ 3)A A A A A

A A A A 4

A A A

- A A A 4 K-40 A 84.7A 2213.3( 3/ 3)AC30 A 2620.0( 1/ 1)A 2620.0( 1/ 1)A A A A (1860.0-2620.0)A A (2620.0-2620.0)A (2620.0-2620.o)*

4 A A A A A A

I

. l l

TABLE 15-20 CARNIVOROUS FISH Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis l

Ra 226 all 57.4 4 8.6 113 C29 * * -- 1 13.0 113 300/c30 Th 232 all 49.0 4 7.2 71.3 C29*

1 11.0 71.3 550/c30 I131 all 35.6 4 3.9 35.6 C29** --

1 2.0 35.6 40/ preop Ba 140 all 29.0 4 7.5 29.0 C29** --

12.0 29.0 70/c30 Ru 106 all <LLD 4- 32.6 <LLD C29** --

2 47.0 <LLD 320/c30 Cs 137** all 18.8 4 4.5 33.6 --

C29 *

1 2.0 33.6 50/ preop cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's.

Influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

tr TABLE 15-20 (Con't)

CARNIVOROUS FISH Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis (Con't)

Zr 95 all 5.4 4 3.9 5.4 C29** 1 2.0 5.4 40/c30 Cs 134** all <LLD 4 3.4 <LLD --

C29 *

2 5.0 <LLD 30/c30 Mn54 all <LLD 4 3.5 <LLD C29** 2 5.0 <LLD 30/c30 Zn 65 all < LLD 4 8.2 <LLD --

C29** ---

2 12.0 <LLD 80/c30 K 40 all 2213 4 84.7 ---

C29** 1 65.0 2160 26200/c30 c30 ---

1 42.0 2620 26200/c30 I

l l

ODIfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational l program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's-influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational

program or operating station used to calculate limit.

Critical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

1 I __ _ .

Y

\

_4. ... , .

.l.2 m FIGURE-III-8l 4

- * ~

,- i l. i- __. t .

, INGESTION FA1nwai (CARNIVOROUS FISR)~NUCLTDE'IRENDS _- . -.-- . - . - -

j---

=.s=.- _ _ _ _ . ___ _. _

-._ _ . . , _ , h - -_ R _ . t

[

a __ ; .. ._ __ --- - --

g yg . - - - - - - _ - - . _ - ,

. . _ _ _ . _ . _-- . ._ _ m 8 2- - - - - - -

10 1

- .4-*- - - -

, , , , ,,_ m ., -

e.w- ., .-we--

, . . . e--

-mee.-

w 10 2 _ ___

m* .

( ( . . _ _ __

g .. - - -

a . _ . . . _ . -

Cs /37. . ... ..

10 1

.t -- - - . a-/*/ . . . . . . . - . -

4 4 p6a-. .mr, , m-wwm ,i. g.,

Ra 126

=M g ; Th 2 _ ___.

.- m w. -w-d e e . m._ . . -

s. ,,~.-~-.-

p3l g ( .. - - - . . .-- . .-..

w - -e u rJ -

.-m.>4.a- mm-.,m. ,,_ . ,ws, .L ,-. w%-.a ,,>g-- w- ,- . .-wa

_ 4 _.

10 0

- -. - ~.

N he .*r-- e'nmww=e n wh e e =.e.im-sew -gw,_

, .pA ,,,w l i

' ^ ' '

-- - -., _ _ . . _= _ . _... .._ ,

y g

e--- ._ _ _ - , _ . . - . . . . _ -.

1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 ~ 1982 1983 l' _ . _ _

E

(

IBGESTION PATWIAY (EERBITOROUS FISB)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze herbivorous fish.

. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis

, Sample Station C29. is ' the critical station in this pathway and no sample had greater than 10 times the control station or preoperational values.

The 1983 operational concentrations are generally lower than preoperational concentrations and are consistent with previous years' operational concentra-tions.

=

1 l

l l

i I

l l

1 - _ - . . . - _ .

TABLE III-21 ENVIRUHMENTAL kADIOLOGICAL HONIT0k!NG PROGRAM SUMhAPY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-3D2 CITRUS COUNTY, ELDRIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/63 PATHWAY A TYPE I NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION Atat AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A A A A A 4 HERB. FISH A A A A (PCI/MG) A GAMMA A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

4 BA-140 A 13.6A 163.9( 2/ 43AC29 A 310.0( 1/ 2)A 17.7( 1/ 21A A A A ( 17.7- 310.0)A A ( 310.0- 310.0)A ( 17.7- 17.75A A

A A' A A A A A TH-232 2 12.5A 52.9( 4/ 4)AC29 A 54.5( 2/ 2)A 51.4( 2/ 2)A A A A ( 46.2- 62.0)A A ( 46.9- 62.01A ( 46.2- 56.6)A A A A 4 A A A A I-131 A 7.3A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A 4

A A A A A

A A A A A A A I A RA-226 A 14.2A 114.2( 4/ 4)AC29 A 134.8( 2/ 2)A 93.6( 2/ 214

A A ( 49.2- 214.0)A A ( 55.6- 214.03A ( 49.2- 138.0)A A A A A A A A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A CS-134 A 6.1A A 4

A A A A A A 4 A A A A A

A R0-10C A 54.3A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A

& A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 7.3A 14.4( 4/ 43AC29 A 21.2( 2/ 2)A 7.6( 2/ 2)A A A A ( 5.6- 22.3)A A ( 20.1- 22.3)A ( 5 . 6 -- 9.714 A A A 4 4 A A A

A 2k-95 A 6.5A MD( 0/ 4)A A A 4 A A A A A A -

A A A 4 A A A A MM-54 A 6.0A 6.5( 1/ 4)AC30 A 6.5( 1/ 2)A 6.5( J/ 2)A A A A ( 6.5- 6.5)A A ( 6.5- 6.5)A ( 's.5- 6.5)A A A A A A A A A

- A ZN-65 A 15.0A NDt 0/ 4)A A A A A A A

- A A A A A A 4 A A A 43AC29 A 3715.0( 2/ 2)A 2709.7( 2/ 2)A A K-40 A 122.0A 3212.4( 4/

A A A (2530.0-3720.0)A A (3710.0-3720.0)A (2530.0-2889.4)*

A A A A A A A

1 TABLE I5-22 i HERBIVOROUS FISH Sampling No. of Highest Limite !

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD le Value Location (pci/kg) (pel/kg) Sing (pel /kg) (pcl/kg)

Gamma l Analysis '

Ra 226 all 114 4 14.2 214 C29** --

1 22.0 214 2160/c30 Th 232 all 52.9 4 12.5 62.0 --

C29** 1 18.0 62.0 667/c30 I 131*

all <LLD 4 7.3 <LLD --

C29** -- 2 9.0 <LLD 100/ preop Ba 140 all 164 4 13.6 310 --

C29** 1 18.0 310 206/C30 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 54.3 <LLD --

C29** ---

2 77.0 <LLD 708/c30 Cs 137*

all 14.4 4 7.3 22.3 --

C29** -- 1 10.0 22.3 135/c30 1

cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

TABLE 15-22 (Con't)

HERBIVOROUS FISH Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pel/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg) (pel/kg)

Gamma Analysis (Con't)

Zr 95 all <LLD 4 6.5 <LLD C 29 * * ---

2 9.0 <LLD 88/c30 Cs 134** all <LLD 4 6.1 <LLD --

C29'* 2 8.0 <LLD 96/c30 4

Mn54 all 6.5 4 6.0 -- ---

C29** 2 8.0 <LLD 96/c30 C30 --

1 5.0 6.5 96/c30 Zn 65 all <LLD 4 15.0 <LLD C29** --

2 19.0 <LLD 213/c30 4

i K 40 all 3212 4 122 3720 --

C29** --

1 47 3720 31006/ preop I

1

~

cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 93 percentile confidence value from preoperational l program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's nfluence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational )

program or operating station used to calculate limit. l ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuc!! des. '

<=

^ ~ -

I

.? .'*? . 9 --

6

. .FIGUREhIIIO

_ _2 i .. . _3

- t

[ 2 2.:_ .L = a g _

!- INGEST 10N' PATHWAY ~(HEREIVDROUS FISHT-NtTCLIDE~ TRENDS -

i 4._ L2. . .2 __b. _u 4 _

. i. _ _ _ _ .. p-__.

4._. _

q , , _

t .

i .,. .

___a_ __

3 ._ _

y .

10 8

- - ~ -

j l

.._4 _. _._~w...%, - . . . . _ . . _ . _

.wp..u- m . - - - - -

__ . ..+m .-- e-. . e... . - - ww.'- . * * .

_gy... . . + . - .=..o, i - *-a .w..

w __ .. _ ..-.. . - _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ .

l

.m 5

) (

10 2 t_ . _ _ ._. _, __ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ _ _ ,

l

_ _ . - a g 4

,g _._ . . . _ . _ .

U , -..

g. . . - _ . . .

_.j _ _ . _ _ .._.. __ ..

-4 - . --_- . - _ . . _ .

1

.' c W -

101 .._

-M. . . -.132,._ S ...--

- ,r-

~

\

,yf7 ,

._ 7 -_ g _ _ f . __ -. - '

.? ~l -

' R" . .

J.~ ~._ Z~. - _

. # _. .lZ~fE- '

... . ~- - . , .- .. - . . .

/ .

1 ~

- . - - . - - . . . - . - .._.- - -.-.a L 4 10 ' J - - _.

- . _ _ _ _ .y

, 4

, . 1 .

i i j j

[ . _ , _ .;

l ..

. ' . . _ . _ . . . _ .l1 - _. .

l , !._ . ._ _-. ._p; _ o . : l

. . . - . -_ , . . . . - . _ . y--.-__,

g . --- - _ ...~o....

. .l +

.....s...

y -. ,

.} _ . . . _ _L..... .._A- . . 4 g

1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 19B2 1983

... -- - n

IBGESTICE PATIEfaY (OTSTERS)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze oysters. .There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Canuna Analysis All. samples were' collected and analyzed except for the second half 1983 C29.

No. live oysters could be found. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1983 ' operational' concentrations are consistent with previcus years' opera-tional concentrations ' and generally lower than the preoperational concentra-1 tions.

5 I

i 4

I n

i k

i A

f i

i

. . -. . ~ . . . . . , , - .. ,- . . . . . . _ _ -, - - , , , - , _ _ , ,- . .

p .

1 TABLE III-23 ENVIRONMENTAL kADI0 LOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CHYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCHET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FL0kIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE E NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTkOL LOCATION ANR4 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA&k A A A A A A A

A A A A A A OYSTERS A A GAMMA A A A A A A (PCI/KG)

INGESTION A ANALYSIS 4 A A A A A A0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 10.6A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 7.0A 22.7( 3/ 3)AC29 A 34.5( 1/ 1)A 16.9( 2/ 2)A A A A ( 10.4- 34.5)A A ( 34.5- 34.5)A ( 10.4- 23.3)A A A A A A A A

A 4.0A HD( 0/ 3)A A A A 3 A I-131 A A A A A A m A A

m A A A A A A A RA-226 A 9.1A 36.4( 3/ 3)AC30 A 39.0( 2/ 2)A 39.0( 2/ 2)A g

A A A ( 14.8- 63.1)A A ( 14.8- 63.1)A ( 14.0- 63.1)A A A A A A A A

A ku-106 A 32.7A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 4.7A 1.5( 1/ 3)AC30 A 1.5( 1/ 2)A 1.5( 1/ 2)A A A A -( 1.5- 1.5)A A ( 1.5- 1.5)A ( 1.5- 1.5)A A A A A A A A 4.8A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A ZR-95 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MN-54 A 3.5A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

3)A A A A A ZN-65 A 8.3A ND( 0/

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 10-40 A 75.4A 861.6( 3/ 3)AC29 A 1001.8( 1/ 1)A 791.5( 2/ 2)A A A A ( 363.0-1220.0)A A (1001.8-1001.8)A ( 363.0-1220.0)A A A A A A A A

. i TABLE 15-24 OYSTERS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all 36.4 4 9.1 C30 -- 1 9.0 63.1 1060/C30 Th 232 all 22.7 4 7.8 C29 1 12.0 34.5 345/C30 I131 all < LLD 4 4.0 <LLD 76.5/C30 Ba 140 . all <LLD 4 10.6 <LLD 124/C30 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 32.7 <LLD 600/C30 Cs 137 - all < LLD 4 4.7 C30 --

1 1.0 1.5 85.4/C30 Zr 95 all <LLD 4 4.8 <LLD 67/C30 Mn54 all <LLD 4 3.5 <LLD 67/C30 Zn 65 all <LLD 4 8.3 <LLD 170/C30 K 40 all 861 4 75.4 -- --

C30 --

1 49.0 1220 19790/C30 cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational prograrn, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

[- __

9 l

' z 's- _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _

-- FIGURE-III-10 - -

.+_ _ _ _ . _ _ . ..___ . . _ _ _ _._ ---_ ,

~

~~ ~

~j ~ INGESTION PATINAY-(0YSTERS)'_{NUCLIDE^ TRENDS-

. - ~ . . _ . _ _ _ - _ _

N

-r-v e4=-

10 3

(

^

O 2

10

~

j l

^ Rs 226 3 e n ios g,

+

4 =

Bs 140 +

10

.. % "N

. =

z -

Ze 1

^

O 0

10

~ '

1977 1978 19'79 1980 1951 19'82 19h3

, IBGESTICE FATRI&Y (SERIMF)

The University .has the responsibility to collect and analyze shrimp. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1983 operational concentrations are consistent with previous years' opera-tional concentrations and preoperational concentrations.

The 1983 ' samples were collected in the vicinity of the Discharge Canal rather than the Ralston Purina facility. This is because the Ralston Purina facility is no longer operating.' This collection method will replace Station C27 for this pathway.

J t

I i

3-l- r

i TABLE ITT-25 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUNnAPI CRYSTAL RIVEk UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-303 CITkUS COUNTY, ELOk!DA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 i

l PATHWAY

TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION A CONTkOL LOCATION AMER AAAAAAAAAAA**AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A A A A A SHkIMP A A A i

A A A A I (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A 2A A A A A 0 INGESTION A ANALYSIS A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A e BA-140 A 11.6A 20.2( 1/ 13AC27 A 20.2( 1/ 1)A 20.2( 1/ 1)A A A ( 20.2- 20.2)A A ( 20.2- 20.2)A ( 20.2- 20.2)A A

A A A A A A A 13.9A 53.6( 1/ 1)AC27 A 53.6( 1/ 1)A 53.6( 1/ 116 A TH-232 A

& A A ( 53.6- 33.6)k A ( 53.6- 53.6)A ( 53.6- 53.6)A A A A A

& A A g A MD( 0/ 1)A A A

1-131 A 7.1A A y

1 A A A A

A A A A A A A A A 14.1A 69.0( 1/ 1)AC27 A 69.0( 1/ 1)A 69.01 1/ 1)A 3 A RA-226 A

( 69.0- 69 9)A l

A A A ( 69.0- 69.0)A A ( 69.0- 69.0)A l A A A A A A A A A 4 20-106 A 51.8A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A . A A A A A A

l A CS-137 A 7.2A NDt 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A ZR-95 A 6.3A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A A A MM-54 A 6.1A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A l A A A

A A A A 1)A A A A

+ IN-65 A 14.7A MD( 0/

A A A A A A A A l A A A i & A A 1)AC27 A 1860.0( 1/ 1)A 1960.0( 1/ 1)A A K-40 A 242.0A 2860.0( 1/

(1860.0-1860.0)A l

1 A A A (1860.0-1860.0)A A (1860.0-1860.0)A A A A A A A l A l

l

TABLE 15-26 SHRIMP Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (ocl/kg) (pel/kg) (pcl/kg) (pcl/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 C27 69.0' 1 14.1 69.0 300/ preop Th 232 C27 53.6 1 13.9 53.6 500/ preop 1131 C27 <LLD 1 7.1 <LLD 100/ preop Ba 140 C27 20.2 1 11.6 20.2 500/ preop Ru 106 C27 <LLD 1 51.8 <LLD 1200/ preop Cs 137 C27 <LLD 1 7.2 <LLD 200/ preop Zr 95 C27 <LLD 1 6.3 <LLD 200/ preop Mn 54 C27 <LLD 1 6.1 <LLD '

100/ preop Zn 65 C27 <LLD 1 14.7 <LLD 200/ preop K 40 C27 1860 1 243 1860 25140/ preop cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station an:1 critical radionuclides.

i 1

-C g :_ _.

-FIGURE-III-11 _

m - - - - - - - . - - - , - ~ . , _ _ . . . . . .. .. . _ .. . ..

INGESTION PATHWAY (SHRIMP) NUCLIDE TRENDS

. (

+~ ----%--. . . . - ._ w.,.

10 2 00 e I 4. J 26 Yo,

M 90s i r4 m i q. evo 10, -

, gj#2 * -

g- "4UN 9 , i n - m W

l 10' l

l W y '

197"7 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 !

l

- 72 - ,

.. 1

4

,. IBGESTION PATWi&Y (MILK) l.

l- The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze milk. There j are no additional stations for this pathway.

I i

! Semiannual Camma Analysis i

f The samples at Sample Station C49, the critical station for this pathway, i- - were not collected due to the unavailability of milk. All other samples were collected and analyzed.

[ The 1983 operational concentrations are consistent with previous years' ' opera-tional concentrations and . generally lower than the preoperational concentra-l tions'. All gamma analysis nuclides indicated drops in environmental concentra-

, tions for 1983.

h 7 f

Monthly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C49 is the critical

station for'this pathway and no samples were collected due to the unavailability i of milk.

The 1983 operational concentrations are less than the preoperational values l and are consistent with other operational concentrations.

i i

4 i

i f

4 I

i i

t' l .

._73 -

i

TABLE III-27 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMhARY CRYSTAL RIVEk UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITkUS COUNTY, ELORIDA kEPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & HO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A MILK A A A A A A A iPCI/L ) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 24 A A A A A A .0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

BA-140 A 5.4A 6.2( 1/ 12)AC47 A 6.2( 1/ 12)A 6.2( 1/ 12)A A A A ( 6.2- 6.2)A A ( 6.2- 6.2)A ( 6.2- 6.2)A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 2.9A 3.5( 1/ 12)AC47 A 3.5( 1/ 12)A 3.5( 1/ 12)A A A A ( 3.5- 3.5)A A ( 3.5- 3.5)A ( 3.5- 3.5)A A A A A A A 4 A CS-134 A 2.6A ND( 0/ 12)A A A A A A A A A A A

, A A A A A A A

-J A CS-137 A 2.9A 6.7( 10/ 13)AC47 A 6.7( 10/ 12)A 6.7( 10/ 12)4

A A ( 4.1- 11.3)A A ( 4.1- 11.3)A ( 4.1- 11.3)A A A A A I A A A

2k-95 A 2.8A ND( 0/ 12)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A CO-58 A 2.7A ND( 0/ 12)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 MH-54 A 2.7A 2.7( 1/ 12)AC47 A 2.7( 1/ 12)A 2.7( 1/ 12)A A A A ( 2.7- 2.7)A .A ( 2.7- 2.7)A ( 2.7- 2.7)A A A A A A A A A CO-60 A 2.9A 3.3( 1/ 12)AC47 A 3.3( 1/ 12)A 3.3t 1/ 12)A A A A ( 3.3- 3.3)A A ( 3.3- 3.3)A ( 3.3- 3.3)A A A A A A A A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A A A A MILK A A A A A Sk 89/90 A A A A A A (PCI/L )

INGESTION A ANALYSIS 24 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A SR-90 A 0.30A 4.16 ( 11 / 12)AC47 A 4.16 ( 11 / 12)A 3.67( 11 / 12)A A A A ( 0.35- 9.10) A A ( 0.35- 9.10) A ( 0.35- 9. lo) A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A Sk-89 A 1.54A26.70( 11/ 12)AC47 A26.70( 1/ 12)A26.70( 1/ 12)A A A A (26.70-26.70)A A (26.70-26.70)A (26.70-26 70)A A A A A A A A

~

l I

l TABLE 15-28 MILK Sampling No. of . Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis I 131*

C47 3.5 12 2.9 3.5 Ba 140 C47 6.2 12 5.4 6.2 Cs 137 C47 6.7 12 2.9 11.3 --

Zr 95 C47 <LLD 12 2.8 <LLD Cs 134 C47 <LLD 12 2.6 <LLD Co58 C47 < LLD 12 2.7 <LLD Mn54 C47 2.7 12 2.7 2.7 Co 60 C47 3.3 12 2.9 3.3 Sr 89 C47 26.'7 12 4.54 26.7 --

Sr 90 C47' 4.16 12 0.3 9.10 --

l l C47 is located in Gainesville, Florida, well outside the plants influence. ' Milk was unavailable j from critical sample location C49

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational

program or. operating station used to calculate limit.

l Critical radionuclides.

T

ricURE-III _ .-

s 'a__ . , _ . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - -

e__ __

._._.._j..

a~

.e.m. -

2 10 6a.140 t

a.

t

(

10 1 L UI Ce 9

/

!k c. m p ~

?

) *

. $8. , a .$"Y l 1,. .

m ._

l

. ~ - - . - . - . . - - . . . . - - .

! .4 t

"19/7- 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983

IBGESTION PATEMAY (ABIMAL) l The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze small terrestial animals. There are no. additional stations for this pathway.

i Semiannual Gamma Analysis Samples for , the first .and second halves of 1983 could not be obtained. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

Samples for this pathway have'always been extremely difficult to obtain.

b I

J

~

- 77.-

o sn ,m-,, ,..,s ,.-s- --

TABLE III-29 ENVikUHHENTAL kADIOLOGICAL MONIT0k1NG PROGkAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No.50-302 CITkUS COUllTY, ELukIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTkOL LOCATION ANkK AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

& A A A A A A SrtALL ANIMALS A A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A A A A A A , A A

+ A A A A A A A TH-232 A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A A A A .A A A A A A A A A A A A 1-131 A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A

A A RA-226 A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A I A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A RU-106. A 0.0A NC/Mt 0/ 0)A A A A A A A. A A A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 'O.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZR-95' A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 'MN-54 A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZN-65 A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A- A A A A A K-40 A 0.0A NC/M( 0/ 0)A A A A

. A A A A. A A A

. A A A A A A A

+

I i

l TABLE 15-30 ANIMALS i

Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (gci/kg) (pel/kg) (pci/kg) (pel/kg)

Gamma l Analysis j NO SAMPLES COLLECTED i

l l

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or ( .

10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station us4 to calculate limit.

l

- - ~ - - . ,, , , - , , , , . - . _ -

.4

, e.s 3 .

'z" 9-FIGURE-III !

s_ ,

-INGESTION ~PATINATTANIMALS) NUCLIDE TRENDS _ _ _

4_. __

i

. _ _. 2 { _ 2 ; ___ _ _

_ ; _. _ _ _ _ _ _ {

8 10

_ r.. ._*~

-m

~

2 10

< Rs L16

~^

k A/h /04 5c. _

p C 07 q

10 1 '

a. No A .

A h.231

-Zr if 4 Cr/39 v--

l

_ _ y _.

. - . + - . - _ . .

Y,

""- em..e- -

~ ~ - - - -~'

10 0 ~~

~

~_ _

l

_ . . . . . . . _ - , _ . ~ . - - - . - -- . - - - - . - . -

. e o p w. *= *=e

- k h--

1977 1978 1979 1950 1951 1982 1983

. INGESTION FOOD CROPS PATIRfAY (CITRUS)

The. State has the responsibility to collect and analyze citrus samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Ganuna Analysis There . are no critical stations in this pathway. All samples were collected and analyzed. The 1983 operational analysis resulted in non-detectable activity as did all previous operational analyses. Therefore, no trend plots are includ-ed with this pathway.

t 1

1 l

l l

i l

. - + , -.

TABLE III-31 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NOHITORING PkOGRAM

SUMMARY

CRY $TAL RIVEk UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-303 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 8 HO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCAfl0N A CONTROL LUCATIOW ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA' A ' A A A A A A CITRUS A A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 1 A, A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A

* * *

A A I A. A A A A A A 03

CS-134 A 34.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A N A A A A A A A I A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CO-58 A 34.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A. A A A A A A A A A A A MN-54 A 31.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

.4 2N-65 A 43.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A.

A A A A A A A A CD-60 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

l IBGESTION FOOD CEOPS PATEMAY (WATERNELDE) l-I h- :The State .has _ the responsibility to collect and analyze watermelon samples.

l There are no additional. stations in this pathway.

Annual Camma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. _There are no critical stations in this - pathway. .There are no preoperational data for this pathway. The 1983 operaticnal analyses resulted in non-detectable activity as did all . previous operational analyses. Therefore, no trend plots were included for this pathway.

-.83 -

TABLE III-32 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

I Ck rSTAL RlWEH UNIT 3 DOCKET No.50-302 CITkUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/03 PATHWAY A TYPE I N'O . A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION AMER AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A WATERMELON A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) -A GAMMA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 1 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

^A I-131 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 03 A CS-134 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A

" A A A A A A A I A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A- A A A A A A A A A A A A A CO-58 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A HN-54 A 21.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZN-65 A 43.04 ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A. A A A A A A A CD-60 A 24.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A.

A A A A A A A A A A A A A

FOOD CHAIN PATHUAY (CEASSES) -

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze grass samples.

There are no! additional stations for this pathway.

' Semiannual Camma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in i this pathway.

The 1983 operational concentrations are consistent with previous operational and preoperational concentrations.

The following discrepancy was noted:

- C40 and second half I-131 LLD exceeded the Technical Specification required LLD due to the bulky nature of the sample which prevented sufficient density (wt/vol) to meet the required LLD's.

t

e TABLE III-33 ENV1kONdENTAL kADIOLOGICAL MUNITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVE 2 UNIT 3 DOCKET-NO.50-302 CITkUS COUNTY, ElokIDA kEPORTING PER10D 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A

A A A A A A VEGETATION A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A E00D CHAIN A ANALYSIS 6A A A A A A 1 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A BA-140 A 15.1A 93.6( 1/ 6)AC05 A 93.6( 1/ 2)A 93.6( 1/ 6)A A A A ( 93.6- 93.6)A A ( 93.6- 93.6)A (- 93.6- 93.6)A A A A A A A A

A TH-232 A 15.1A 69.8( 6/ 6)AC40 A 96.2( 2/ 2)A 69.8( 6/ 6)A A A A ( 38.5- 98.9)A A ( 93.4- 98.9)A ( 38.5- 98.9)A A A A A A A A'

A 8.9A ND( 0/ 6)A A A A B A I-131 A A A A A A A m A A A A Cn A A A A RA-226 A 15.2A 81.5( 6/ 6)AC40 A 122.0( 2/ 2)A 81.5( 6/ 6)A A A A ( 39.5- 134.0)A A ( 110.0- 134.0)A ( 39.5- 134.0)A A A A A

'A A .n A RU-106 A 59.3A 67.2( 1/ 6)AC41 A 67.2( 1/ 2)A 67.2( 1/ 6)A A A A ( 67.2- 67.2)A A ( 67.2- 67.2)A ( 67.2- 67.2)A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 7.5A 271.8( 6/ 6)AC05 A 425.0( 2/ 2)A 271.8( 6/ 6)A A

A A A ( 18.0- 778.0)A A ( 71.9- 778.0)A -( 18.0- 778.0)A A A A A

. A A A A ZR-95 A 6.8A ND( 0/ 6)A A A A A A A A A A A 6 A A A A A A A A MH-54 A 6.4A HD( 0/ 6)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 6)A A A A ZN-65 A 14.8A ND( 0/ A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A K-40 A 116.0A 2360.5( 6/ 6)AC41 A 3375.0( 2/ 2)A 3360.5( 6/ 6)A

, A A A (1550.0-4300.0)A A (2450.0-4300.0)A (1550.0-4300.0 ) A A A A A A A A

TABLE IH-34

~

1 GRASSES i Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location

-(pcl/kg) (pci/kg) (pel/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all 81.5 6 15.2 134 c40 1 22.0 134 23630/ preop Th 232 all 69.8 6 15.1 98.9 C40 1 19.0 98.9 1200/ preop I 131 ' all <LLD 6 8.9 <LLD 100/ preop Ba 140 all 93.6 6 15.1 93.6 2530/ preop C05 ---

1 13.0 93.6 Ru 106 all 67.2 6 59.3 67.2 1200/ preop C41 ---

1 59.0 67.2 Cs 137 all 272 6 7.5 778 C05 --

1 6.0 778 54160/ preop Zr 95 all - <LLD 6 14.8 <LLD 310/ preop Mn54 all <LLD 6 6.4 <LLD 100/ preop Zn 65 all <LLD 6 14.8 <LLD 5890/ preop

! K 40 all 2360 6 116 4300 --

C41 1 119 4300 24302/ preop CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (;:

-10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station usc -

i to calculate limit.

'2 -yIGURE-III .-.

_ -_-.~ INGESTION PA'LHWKY~(GRASSES)~NUCLIDE TRENDS

~ ~~

~

,-o..._..M-_ ~_

._ _ _ _ _ ~ . .

re e .

(

s/M 10 2 , ,

9 de

$ e -

fRA 224 l

aem /A

+

e n2 I

/

8' NO 10 1

~

Q* +,

[J "2 V.

Ar na ~

y

~

10 8 _

l l

,q. m- , e n

19'83

~

19/7 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

8

~l 4

1 FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (SOIL) i j

The University of Florida has the responsibility to collecc and analyze soil samples. There

~~are no additional stations for this pathway.

Gamma Analysis The soli sample collection and analysis is required once every three years. Samples were obtained in 1981 and are not required again until 1984.

i

- 89.-

I . .. _ _

.I FOOD CBAIN PATEMAY (MEAT)

The : State has the responsibility to collect and analyze meat samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Ganuna Analysis

' All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no critical station in this pathway. There are no preoperational data for. this pathway. All 1983 operational analyses resulted in non-detectable activity except for Cs-137 which had elevated concentrations on both samples. Of the two samples collect-

- ed, the results were 126 pei/kg and 1800 pei/kg. A review of other nuclide

- concentrations and the previous two years of Effluent and Waste Disposal Semi-annual Reports indicate that these values are not due to plant operations.

h i

r-s- -~- -, ,, , , . - n-g- , , . - - , . - , , - , , - - , , + ,

TABLE III-35 ENVIRONMEHIAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMhARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No.50-302 CITkUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/83-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A' A MEAT A *A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A 1 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 39.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A- 30.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A I A A A A A A A

, A A A A A A A H A CS-134 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A I A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 37.0A 963.0( 2/ 2)AC50 A 963.0( 2/ 2)A 963.0( 2/ 2)A A A A ( 126.0-1800.0)A A ( 126.0-1800.0)A ( 126.0-1800.0)A A A A A A A A A CO-58 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MN-54 A 32.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A

- A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZN-65 A 66.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CO-60 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A .A A A A A A A A A A A A

l

. POOD CHAIN PATHWAY'(POULTRY) f 4

The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze poultry samples. There i are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Camma Analysis All . samples were collected and analyzed. There is no critical station in this pathway. There'are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1983 operational concentrations were non-detectable as were all previous operational concentrations, therefore, no trend plots were included.

4 I

.f

a TABLE III-36 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOUICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CHYSTAL klVEk. UNIT 3 DUCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REP 0kTING PERIOD 01/01/d3-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANAR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4 A A A A A A A POULTRY A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A A A 0 INGESTION A ANALYSIS' 2A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A DA-140 A 39.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 38.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A I

A A A A A A A w A CS-134 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A W A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 37.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CO-58 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A- A A A A A A A A A MH-54 A 33.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZN-65 A 66.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CD-60 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

.. .~ _. - . . _ . _ _

J l

,. FOOD CHAIN PATENAY (BGCS)

, I The - State has the responsibility to collect and . analyze egg samples. There are no additional-stations in this pathway.

. Semiannual Ganmaa' Analysis-All samples were collected _ and : analyzed. There is no critical sample station in this pathway. There. are no preoperational data for this pathway . and all 1983 operational analyses resulted in non-detectable activity as did:all previ-ous ' operational analyses. Therefore,. no trend - plots were provided for this

. pathway.

d 4

?

i i'

r i

,~

1 i

i

,1

?

i t

l- '

, 94 _ -

= . . . - . .. u - - -...-..a . .. .= - . . - . . , . - . .

f e

TABLE III-37 ENVIkONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVEk tJrtIT 3 DOCKET No.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/03-12/31/83 i PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION AMRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A. A A A EGGS A .A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GANNA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A O A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A SA-140 A 39.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 38.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A. A A A A A A A A A I

A A A A. A A A W 4 CS-134 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A

A A A A A A I- A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 37.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CO-58 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A '

A A A A A MN-54 A 32.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A .

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 ZN-65 A 66.0A hD( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A' , A A A A A A A CD-60 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

[

, FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (GREEE LEAFY VEGETABIES) ,

1 l

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze green leafy vegeta-ble samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway. ;

1 Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical station for this type of analysis (Sample Station C48) is in the east sector at 4.0 miles from the plant. There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1983 operational concentrations are consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical station for this type of. analysis is Station C48. The 1983 operational concentrations for Sr-90 were above the LLD for the analysis. No operational events of effluent releases from Crystal River Unit 3 could be linked with these values. The elevated concentrations may be the result of residual fallout from the 1980 weapons tests.

i L >

l I

! . TABLE III-38 ENVIROHNENTAL kADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMMAPY CRYSTAL kIVEk UNIT 3 DUCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, ELORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/03-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE E NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANR.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A G. L. VEG. A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS 4 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 10.5A 98.6( 1/ 4)AC48 A 98.6( 1/ 2)A ND ( 0/ 2)A A A A ( 98.6- 98.6)A A ( 98.6- 98.6)A A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 10.1A 46.2( 4/ 4)AC47 A 70.5( 2/ 2)A 70.5( 2/ 2)A A A A ( 16.4- 97.8)A A ( 43.1- 97.8)A ( 43.1- 97.8)A A A A A A. A A A I-131 A 6.0A 17.3( 1/ 4)AC47 A 17.3( 1/ 2)A 17.3( 1/ 2)A A A A ( 17.3- 17.3)A A ( 17.3- 17.3)A ( 17.3- 17.3)A A A A A A A A

, 4)AC47 A 75.7( 2/ 2)A 75.7( 2/ 2)A A RA-226 A 12.6A 73.2( 4/

W A A A ( 15.3- 126.0)A A ( 37.4- 114.0)A ( 37.4- 114.0)A

" A A A- A A A A A RU-106 A 45.4A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A CS-137 A 9.2A 51.4( 2/ 4)AC48 A 59.9( 1/ 2)A 42.8( 1/ 2)A A A A ( '42.8- 59.9)A A ( 59.9- 59.9)A ( 42.8- 42.0)A A A A A A A A

A ZR-95 A 5.5A 7.5( 2/ 4)AC48 A 8.3( 1/ 2)A 6.7( 1/ 2)A A A ( 6.7- 8.3)A A ( 8.3- 8.3)A ( 6.7- 6.7)A

A A A A A A A A

A MN-54 A 4.9A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A 14.1A ND( 4)A A A A A ZN-65 A 0/

A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A .

A K-40 A 109.3A 5017.0( 4/ 4)AC47 A 6490.0( 2/ 2)A 6490.0( 2/ 2)A A A A (2768.0-9750.0)A A (3230.0-9750.0)A (3230.0-9750.0)A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*A A A A A A A A:

A A A A G. L. VEG. A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A SR 89/90 A A A A A l

FOOD CHAIN A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A A A A A A .

4)AC48 A169.9( 2/ 2)A 45.5C 2/ 2)A A Sk-90 A 1.9A107.7( 4/

A A A ( 19.4-279.0)A A ( 60.8-279.0)A ( 19.4- 71.7)A A A A A A A A

.)

1 l

TABLE 15-39 GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all 73.2 4 12.6 126 C48** --

1 18.0 126 1820/C47 Th 232 all 46.2 4 10.1 -- ---

C48** --

1 6.0 28.0 1200/C47 C47 1 13.0 97.8 1200/C47 I 131** all 17.3 4 6.0 17.3 C48** --

2 8.0 C47 ---

1 5.0 17.3 260/C47 Ba 140 all 98.6 4 10.5 98.6 C48** -- 1 13.0 98.6 138/C47 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 45.4 <LLD C48** -- 2 53.0 <LLD 622/C47 Cs 137 all 51.4 4 9.2 59.9 --

C48* --

1 3.0 59.9 749/C47 J

cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

. l b

TABLE 15-39 (Con't)

GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pel/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) i Gamma j Analysis (Con't)

Zr 95 all 7.5 4 5.5 8.3 --

C48** -- 1 7.0 5.3 70/C47 Mn54 all <LLD 4 4.9 <LLD --

C48** 2 5.0 <LLD 60/C47 Zn 65 all <LLD 4 14.1 <LLD C48** 2 19.0 <LLD 150/C47 K 40 all 5017 4 109 C48** --

1 34 4320 24300/C47 C47 1 65 9750 24300/C47 Sr 90 all 108 4 1.9 279 C48** 1 2.4 279 1181/C47 l

1 i

! CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit, ccCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

4' j

~

'z'**

FIGURE-III-15 9_ i

, 'E

- ,_ro6D CHAIN ~~NIN5YlGREENTMC_ VEGETABLES) NUCLIDE TRENDS i- _ ___

i th

- - . . . k, .. - , _ . . .

l

. . . - _ - . s ~'... - -

. - - . -. . eme -

10s _ _ - __ .._ _ _ _

.e

~. __

w-- -~ .e ae

+-+- em--.

..se.- e.

n. - --m--s ,~%h w : #' ~ . C 127 10 2 __ ___

.-- . . . ~ . . ,

-+ _m,.,

d .+ ,

~

g, & /d6 ~ Se 9(. . ..~~ . _.

10 1 3 fM v 6a /W i do. . ..__.__.

.m ,

/ z,

. . -. ~

m = .-mm-e 8

l 10 - - -- - -- -- -

S n

w%. .-.*_4-. ~ - . . . . - . < w L,w.. .-, .-

I k

~

T917 1938 19'79 1980 1981 1982 1983 100 -

9

. IV. EITEm m - RADIATION This category includes measurements of ambient radiation at numerous

- locations -and frequencies as required -by Section 3.2.2 of Environmental Technical '. Specifications. A brief narrative summary, two tables and a trend plot, is provided to document in easily usable form the effects of effluent releases from Crystal River Unit 3 on the surrounding environ-ment.

The first table summarizes the data as required _ by Section 5. 6.1. A of Environmental Technical Specifications. The second table provides a 4

comparison of required reporting levels to the analytical data as required by Section 5.6.2.C(2). The trend plot was developed from the mean of

. the ' State ' DHRS and the University of Florida external radiation data for all locations from 1977 to 1983.

t if I

- 101'-

7

N EXTEREAT. RADIATION The " External Radiation" portion of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Specification 3.2.3) is split between the University and the State.

(See Table I-1.) The University also has a TLD at Sample Station C47 and the State has additional TLD's at Sample Stations C04, C40, and C46. Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G are the critical stations in this pathway.

The 1983 data from all TLD stations are consistent with previous operational

. years' data and preoperational data. Additionally, the critical stations and the control stations of the University also compare very well. However, because the University and the State use different types of TLD's, it is neces-sary to report their results separately. The higher values associated with Station C26 are attributed to the concentration of phosphate local to the station as well as substrate adjacent to the TLD location.

- 102 -

. _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ . . ._. ~.

TABLE IV-1 t:

ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITokiNG PROGRAM SUMf1ARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-QO2 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/-12/31/83 PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIDHS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANR4 4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A.

A' A A A J- A A A A A 4

. AIR SUBMERSION A EXTEkHAL A

A A A A (MREM /YR) 'A R AD I AT ION 64A A A 4 46.0 A 30.( 64/ 64)AC26 A 154.( 4/ 4)A 34.( 52/ ~52)A O A A 'A ( 7.- 160.)A A ~( 149.- 160.)A ( 7.- 160.)A I

H O

W l

~

TABLE IV-2 EXTERNAL RADIATION Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (mrem /yr) (mrem /yr) (mrem /yr) (mrem /yr)

External

' Radiation (U of F) all 30 36 15 C14H *

1 15 15 158/C47 C14M *

1 15 13 158/C47 C14G** --

1 15 13 158/C47 L

aDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

cCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

-104- 1

.U

_-f.... 1 18'*f. * !^ 'I #

~

._1 3 ;

, t FIGURE-IV-1l _ .

r. _

. l

.- . y. . 1-

, , j , EXTERK10LDYlTIONj TRENDS _ - -

ja F-3 wr =. --m . I _ i r ~~= 1 .

.__L. __4 . .._p _4_

g

.--...j- ..- . _. -.. . --. . . . - - . - . h - - _- .Jx T -g. c

,.g ,._ - - - - . - - .. ._.

l . . . . - . . . . _ _ , - . . _ - - . - - ... .- ~

- --.~ .

4

- ._ . . . . - - ---. . .-=,.._ . . .-.

m, , , , _ , . , , ,

r t 1 m.n 4 8

,,.,m.--. m- . . - - . . susa,--- -. -w--*-.e - .*- -.- *-

'-*?'***'- "****- * * . *-'.*

~'-i ~.s- ,.e m.w. - ,. ,. . -. . *+ ---.-. -..a-- - **'*"-*9******

i-w-w.-- -*h~ - ------ -** * " +- ---

. . ,,,..we e+..-. ... -

w. yg ..--,m '-i.**-. -ehw

.it-m.

. .. l i

_7-.-__..____.

1OO ._ . ._. . . . _ _ _ _ .

-... -- . ~ . - . -

- -.ew.m.e-.me,eu--

N . . - . .. - . _ .

}e q 4'.__._._.-__. .

y _ , a _._ _ _ .

h em

. . .- m .i .

1

__,. . . -~- .. , _ . - ._. _

W

.~

.e.w.i.,

u- - e. e =,w -e.ww-. ., ., 4 .,!4., .:m % em,..me4 .m. -p.e.

,..m-

. e o..w we. - u,,.,_,

s e -. +_.e +. -.,..,..o. -4.- 4 w g- .m_ . . - - g,,,._wp...w ,.e-um w .

f bO. '

~ ... -,_ _ _ . . . .

. QTCta ta ~ e f Re&da OftHf

- ~-' - '-- -

. .2- .--. ...__ ,. ._. _ _ _ . , _ _ . _ . _ - -

,_._ __ ...~, . v 47 d{ 4

. .__. .._.- _. .. i__ __ . , , _

m_ . - ._.,.

h +be -e P-WS.4.2 .- 4 * .Adew.m.eme.e.---i-. - -e - e.- a w p

4 I

J- ._-.~_._._7..__. __. .. . , _ _ ... .

_.. .. ._.. _ . _ ,. .. ~ . .

t= : ' ..; -

I- J._. .._ l.. _

d '

,i _ . C . _ ~. . 4 i: . . _ .

U, 6 . .e-+e- - i o+.*r 4wi - 4. 4 =rh4 .-_-J.--,.wo.emi.-.-e+. . , . _ -.m.,

p

q. ... - . - _ ~ _ _ _s -

I 7._ .. .j

.._..._.._j.,..._._;-_....y a_ ,.. t % .. - - ,. e, .. _ . . _ . . 6, w , , g.

h .

.i. .._._...[...-...._._..,~4.._._. . .

- a. _ . . _ . . . .

......4.._ '

1- . _ _ : _

- 1977 -

1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 105 -

l Table 2.1 .

Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Plant General Information Licensee Florida Power Corporation P. O. Box 14042 St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Location 7.5 miles northwest (NW) of Crystal River, Florida Direction and Proximity Crystal River, Florida; 7.5 miles of Nearest City southeast (SE)

Permanent Population 7,100 Population and Proximity of Nearest Metropolitan Areas Ocala, Florida 36,000; 45 miles northeast (NE )

Gainesville, Florida 72,000; 60 miles northeast (NE )

Approximate Popu lation (1980)

Around Site O 2-mile Radius 0 5-mile Radius 1,200 10-mile Radius 11,200 50-mile Radius 275,000 i

Reactors CR-3 Type - Size PWR - 855 MWe Commercia l Operation March, 1977 Nuclear Steam Supply System Babcock & W ilcox

' Number of Steam Generators Two Architect-Engineer Gilbert Associates, Inc.

Constructor J. A. Jones Containment Dry, reinforced concrete cylinder with steel liner Condenser Cooling Method Once-through Cooling Water Source Gulf of Mexico .

Safety-related Service Gulf of Mexico Water Source

-Emergency AC Power Source Emergency Diesel Generators Size of-Site 4,738 acres 1

l l

Page 2-5 Date 9/30/83 Rev. 3 1

I

9 i l

v- t Maursyggxr l c

lj . -

uo g -

g 's

",',73 A10.03 M

Power

-( 81 ft P O ft A f f O se March 30,1984 3F0384-23 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection & Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, GA 30303

Subject:

Crystal Docket R4ver Unit .}Vg No. 50-302/

Operating License No. DPR-72 Annual Radiological Enviroismental Operating Report

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Pursuant to Crystal River Unit 3 Technical Specification, Appendix B, Part 1, Section 5.6.1, attached is a copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. The report contains the data obtained from the radiological environmental surveillance program conducted for the Crystal River Site for 1983.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office.

Sincerely, t

G. R. Westafer Manager, Nuclear Operations Licensing and Fuel Management Attachment j REF/ mig cc: Document Control Desk (18)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 I

O FFIC AL C Yk g

! GEN ERAL OFFICE 3201 Thirty fourth Street South

P.O. Box 14042, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 e 813-866-5151 1

3F0384-23, Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,1983

Contents

Text

.f

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Subject:

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Navigation menu

3F0384-23, Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,1983

Text

.f

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Subject:

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Navigation menu

Search