3F0487-22, Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Rept
| ML20210B501 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1986 |
| From: | Johnson S, Mckee P, Eric Simpson FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| 3F0487-22, 3F487-22, NUDOCS 8705050342 | |
| Download: ML20210B501 (73) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 1986 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 0 APPROVED BY: 6 Director, Nuclear Site Support DATE: !/7![/ I APPROVED BY: M8M Director, Nuclea'r Plant Operations DATE: 1((PI i APPROVED BY: Manager, Site Nucl' ear Services DATE: Y =2 #/- 87 D2- -
#M' 3 8705050342 861231 g25 PDR R
ADOCK 05000302 PDR h .
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 List of Sampling Stations 3 Site and Area Maps 4 Sample Station Locations 7 II. LAND USE CENSUS 9 III. MEDIA OTHER THAN EXTERNAL RADIATION 14 Air Inhalation Pathway 16 Seawater Pathway 23 Ground Water Pathway 29 Drinking Water Pathway 34 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway 39 Ingestion Pathways Carnivorous Fish 44 Oysters 48 Food Crops (Citrus) 52 Food Crops (Watermelon) 53 Food Chain Pathways Broad Leaf Vegetation 57 IV. EXTERNAL RADIATION 61 V. INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON 65 i
. ' INTRODUCTION The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides informa-tion which can be used in assessing the type and quantity of radia-tion exposure to the public that results from the operation of Crystal River Unit 3.
The Program is conducted via contracts with the University of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, and the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Orlando, Florida. The parts of the Program for which each is responsible are listed in Table I-1. The requirements of Technical Specifications provide limits on radionuclides assessed by the Program. There are, however, addi-tional nuclides detected and reported that are not addressed in the specifications, and the associated limits are stated as N/A. The trend plots are for specific nuclides that are important in evalu-ating the impact of effluent releases on the environment. The program provides for a continuation of the preparation, sampling, and analysis program in order to identify increases of radioactivity in the environment. 1
AIR 80RE RELEASES LISIID RELEASES
,r ir AIR ;;XTER M L RADIATI C' SEAMTER
--* 4---
? GROUNO M TER - -
SEDIENTS 4
> DRINKING MTER
* -> AQUATIC ANIMLS <
/4 3r
> F000 CR0PS e--
ir v if MAN FIGURE I-1: Environmental Media and Exposure Pathways 2
TABLE I-1 Responsibility Pathway Samole Stations University Air Submersion C01, CO3, C04, CO8, C09, C14G, C18, C27 C41, C47*, C60, C61, C62, C63, C64, C65, C66, C68, C69, C70, C71, C72, C73, C74, C75, C76, C77, C78, C79 State Air Submersion C04, C09, C18 University Air Inhalation C41, C47* State Air Inhalation C07, C18, C40, C46 University Seawater C13*, C14G, C14H University Ground Water C40* University Potable Water CO7*, C10*, C18* University Shoreline External Sediment C09*, C14G, C14H, C14M University Ingestion Fish (Carnivorous) C29, C30* University Ingestion Oysters C29, C30* State Ingestion Food (Citrus) C19 State Ingestion Food (Watermelon) C04 University Food Chain C47*, C48a, C48b Broad Leaf Vegetation State Census All land areas within 5 (Nearest milk animal, miles nearest residence, nearest garden 500 sq.ft.)
- Control Location.
3
cia l v b.. ~ cos .
., Y ooss,,,
cig *
'a c4g,
*b C29 q '~ .
Clkg w wa ..., ,;- ' + - c> c, Plant gg,, J r y 4 clo co9 ., IIGURE y.g. l % nnental y , Orfng 3,,py e , ION Locatgon, 4
C60 C61
- r. 0, - q2 mfC -
O
'D.
/ ci N C73
- C63 C71 cyg 9;
[
\3 m caer ,.. ;, _
* - iC64
" ' ' " = m C27 e i _ ._i
% C65 "1 ~*'
s i ww , C70 g C67*.E00 C69 #, , FIGURE I-3: Environmental Monitoring TLD Locations (Site Boundary) 5
CO3 C18 _ C79 w.* OI* C04
- ousseau i
.C74 l
r i j FFC Property Line
; x 1 -
~
Cl4C l C75 C78 Plant Site C76 *
# 9
^Yd % C77 '#"
p g - C09 ,,*, Cdb FIGURE I-4: Environmental Monitoring Locations (5 miles) 6
TABLE I-2 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Stations Location Distance Direction From Plant Station Location From Plant (mi) C04 State Park Old Dam on ENE 6.3 River near road intersection C07 Crystal River Public Water Plant ESE 7.5 CO9 Fort Island Gulf Beach S 4.0 C10 Indian Waters Public Water Supply ESE 5.9 C13 Mouth of Intake Canal WSW 3.4 C14H Head of Discharge Canal NW O.1 C14M Midpoint of Discharge Canal W 1.2 C14G Discharge Canal at Gulf of Mexico W 2.8 C18 Yankeetown City Well N 5.2 C19 NW Corner State Roads 488 & 495 ENE 8.5 C29 Discharge Area N 2.0 l C30 Intake Area WSW 3.6 i l C40 Near N.E. Site Boundary near E 3.5 l excavated pond & pump station C41 Onsite Meteorological Tower SSW O.4 C46 North Pump Station N O.4 C47 University of Florida, Gainesville NNE 52 C48A Onsite North of CR 4 & 5 N O.8 C48B Onsite NNE of CR 4 & 5 NNE O.8 7 l- . , _ _ . _ - . . . - . . - - _ - . _ _ _ - . . . - . . . - . - _ _ - _ _ - - _ . - - _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _
TABLE I-2 (Continued) Distance Location Direction (Ft.) Rina TLDs (Inner Rina) C27 W 3400 C60 N 4400 C61 NNE 4400 C62 NE 5300 C63 ENE 4400 C64 E 4400 C65 ESE 1740 C66 SE 1600 C67 SSE 1480 C68 S 1500 C69 SSW 1780 C41 SW 2100 C70 WSW 4400 C71 WNW 3600 C72 NW 2400 C73 NNW 2000 Rina TLDs (5 Mile Rina) Distance Location Direction (M1.) C18 N 5.2 CO3 NNE 5.3 C04 NE 6.3 C74 ENE 5.5 C75 E 4.2 C76 ESE 6.0 C08 SE 3.5 C77 SSE 3.2 C09 S 3.2 C78 WSW 4.1 C14G W 2.8 C01 NW 4.9 C79 NNW 5.0 8
~ .-
A II. LAND USE CENSUS Technical Specification 3.12.1.2 requires a land use census of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 500 square feet producing fresh leafy vegetables in each of the land based meteorological sectors within a distance of five miles at least once per 12 months. The land use census for 1986 was performed in June. The milk animal survey disclosed a pet goat and a large number of range cattle, none of which were reported to be providing milk for humuns. The residence survey identified one house boat at Shell Island and a cabin located on a small island near the northeast corner of Shell Island; S at 2.6 miles and SSE at 2.2 miles. Both the boat and cabin appear to be for recreational use. A house is located on the Hollinswood Ranch; NNE at 1.5 miles. This house is reportedly used as a field office or as a hunting camp but not as a permanent residence. The nearest permanent residences are 3.4 miles from the plant in the ENE and SSE directions. The garden census identified six garden sites within five miles of the plant. 9 l
TABLE II-1 CRYSTAL RIVER RESIDENCE SURVEY RESULTS , JUNE 1986 4 Range Section Bearing Nearest Residence Location N 4.4 miles At a double-wide mobile home near the
- 2. degrees south edge of Section 4, T17S, R16E, about 1.7 miles west of U.S. 98 NME (A) 1.5 miles At an isolated house located on the
- 18. degrees Hollinswood Ranch property near the i south edge of Section 21, T17S, R16E. This house is reportedly used as a field office or as a hunting camp but not as a permanent residence.
l NNE (B) 3.8 miles The next-nearest residential location
- 15. degrees in this sector was at a mobile home next to the marina basin on the north side of the Barge Canal on the ,
! Hollinswood Mine property in the southwest part of Section 10, T17S, R16E. i NE 4.0 miles At an isolated home on the north side
- 47. degrees of Acacia Avenue just east of U.S. 98
; in Section 13, T17S, R16E.
ENE 3.4 miles In the main complex of the
- 60. degrees Hollinswood Ranch property near . the western edge of Section 24, T17S, R16E.
E 3.5 miles At an isolated mobile home about 1/4
- 97. degrees mile southwest from the Red Level Cemetery in Section 36, T17S, R16E.
ESE 4.2 miles On the north side of west Indian 101 degrees Trail North about 0.3 miles west of Tallahassee Road, in the northwest part of Section 6, T18S, R17E. f SE (A) 4.4 miles An isolated cabin was located
- 136. degrees in Section 13, T18S, R16E, on the
' south bank of the Crystal River ! across from the crystal River Historical Memorial. The occupancy status of this cabin is unknown. The i only access was by boat, i
- SE (B) 4.7 miles The next-nearest residence was on the i 133. degrees north bank of the Crystal River at i "The Rocks", near the center of Section 13, T18S, R16E.
l 10
,,-w= -w-.-,-+->~.--------wc- *ew-==w- + - - - ---+,-e-=--.- ,--=--m-ve--e-ev--e_ -- -&
TABLE II-1 CRYSTAL RIVER RESIDENCE SURVEY RESULTS JUNE 1986 (Continued) Range Section Bearing Nearest Residence Location SSE (A) 2.2 miles A cabin was located near th 167. degrees of Section 9, T18S, R16E, on island near the northeast c Shell Island. It did not a be occupied at the time of vey, but it may serve for ational use. SSE (B) 3.4 miles A two-story geodesic home was - 150. degrees on the south side of State about 1.9 miles west of the Science Station, in the east of Section 15, T18S, R16E. S 2.6 miles A houseboat was moored at t 180. degrees end of Shell Island in the n corner of Section 16, T185 This same craft was moored current location during our 1984 surveys. This appears fixed location for this cra its occupancy status is unkn-did not appear to be occuple time of our surveys, but it a for recreational use. there other potential residences sector. SSW No residences were located within a five-mile ras SW No residences were located within a five-mile rar WSW No residences were located within a five-mile rar W No residences were located within a five-mile rar WNW No residences were located within a five-mile r NW (A) 4.5 miles An isolated cabin was locate. 326. degrees south bank of the withlacooch at a boat dock about O. upstream from the point o Elbow. The only access is and there were no power lines this location. This cabin appear to be occupied at the our survey, but it may se recreational use. 11
TABLE II-1 CRYSTAL RIVER RESIDENCE SURVEY RESULTS JUNE 1986 (Continued) Range Section Bearino Nearest Residence Location NW (B) 4.6 miles An isolated house was located in the 319. degrees marshland south of State Road 40 between Bird Creek and Pats Elbow of the Withlacoochee River. This is in the southern part of Section 12, T17S, R15E. NNW 4.5 miles At the Cowart residence, 51 Magnolia 338. degrees Avenue, Yankeetown. This is in the northern part of Section 7, T17S, R16E. Range Section Bearino Nearest Garden Location (1) N 4.6 miles In the southwest corner of Section 3,
- 11. degrees T17S, R16E, about 1.0 miles west of U.S. 98 and about 0.3 miles south of South River Road.
NNE 4.8 miles On the north side of South River Road
- 17. degrees at power line crossing, which is about O.4 miles west of U.S. 98.
NE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. ENE 4.2 miles At the second house west of Basswood
- 60. degrees Avenue on the north side of Checkerberry Street in the Crystal Manor subdivision. This is in the northeast part of Section 24, T175, R16E.
E 4.4 miles At the Curtis Tool Company on the
- 97. degrees east side of Tallahasse Road (Old Highway 19) about 1/2 mile south of
. the entrance road to Red Level Cemetery.
ESE 4.3 miles At the Seaman residence, 11679 West 102. degrees Indian Trail North in the Indian Woods development. 12
TAntt II-1 CRYSTAL RIVER RESIDENCE SURVEY RESULTS JUNE 1986 b (Continued) Range Section Bearina Nearest Garden Location (l) SE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. SSE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. S No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. ( SSW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. SW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. - WSW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. W No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. WNW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. NW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range. NNW 4.5 miles At the Bauman residence at the 339. degrees extreme south end of Magnolia Avenue in Yankeetown. this is in the northern part of Section 7, T17S, R16E. (1) With estimated total area of 500 square feet or more and producing green leafy vegetables. 13
l l III. MEDIA OTHER THAN EXTERNAL RADIATION This category includes all samples of environmental exposure pathways other than external radiation (thermoluminescent dosi-meter). The samples are collected and analyzed in accordance with Crystal River Unit 3, Technical Specifications Section 3.12, Table 3.12-1. Each Pathway analyzed is presented in this section by data summaries, data comparisons, and plots in order to document in an easily understandable form, the effects of effluent releases from Crystal River Unit 3 on the surrounding environment. The data summaries are presented in the format of Regulatory I h Guide 4.8, December 1975, as required by Technical Specifica-tions, Section 6.9.1.5(c). For example, each summary provides the following type of information: PATHWAY: Air Inhalation TYPE AND NO.: Gross B 208 Analysis type and total number of samples. LLD: 0.008 Lower Limit of Detection ALL LOCATIONS: 0.016(199/208) 0.016 is mean of 199 detectable (0.002 - 0.029) measurements from a total of 208 samples (i.e., fraction of detectable measurements). Range of detectable measurements is 0.002 to 0.029. HIGHEST LEAN C26 Sample Station L0tATION:' 0.019 (24/26) Mean, Fraction Detectable (0.011 - 0.029) Range CONTROL LOCATION: .017 (17/18) Mean, Fraction Detectable (0.007 - 0.029) Range NRR: 1 1 value flagged as exceeding limits. l 14
NEDIA OTHER THAN EXTERNAL RADIATION fContinued) The data comparisons are provided to compare the mean, LLDs, highest single values and control Station values (whenever LLD) to the Technical Specification limits of Tables 3.12-2 and 4.12-1. The plots provide a rapid assessment of trends for specific nuclides that are considered to be indicators of environmental effects due to plant operations. Deficiencies and unusual or out-of-specification values are detailed for each Pathway. Information is provided to explain the deviations. 15
AIR INHALATION PATHWAY The Air Inhalation Pathway is one of two pathways with sample stations monitored by the University of Florida and the State. The Control Station, C47, is operated by the University of Florida. This pathway involves three types of analyses: weekly gross beta, weekly I-131, and quarterly gamma spectral analysis. No limits were exceeded and except for several weeks following the Chernobyl acci-dent, in which atmospheric radiation levels were elevated, all data is consistent with previous operational values. 1 weekly Gross Beta Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed except for three: two samples were not collected because of twisted sample hoses resulting in no ficw, the other sample was not analyzed because the filter disintegrated during the sample collection. Four analyses had calculated LLDs greater than the maximum allowed by the Technical Specifications. Three of those were due to low sample volume which was in-turn due to a suspected pcwer outage. Once sample exceeded i its maximum LLD because of a shorter than normal sample duration: the previous week's sample was collected late. Egg)civ I+-131 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed except for one. This was due to a filter label blocking sample flow. The Technical Specifi-l cation LLD of one sample was exceeded because of a shorter than normal sample duration: the previous week's sample was collected late. I 16
AIR INHALATION PATHWAY fContinued) l Ouarterly Gamma Analysis (Comoosite) All samples were collected and analyzed except for the missed samples described under the Weekly Gross Beta Analysis. No LLDs were exceeded. i e 17
TABLE III - 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUDGEARY l CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 l l CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86 - 12/31/86 l l l PATHWAY TYPE & NO. LLQ ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION NRR 1 l l Air Inhalation Gross B 312 i ! (PCi/m3) l l O.008 0.026 (296/307) C46 0.029 (51/57) 0.016 (51/51) l l (0.003-0.435) (0.010-0.359) (0.003-0.210) 4 l l Air Inhalation Iodine 312 (PCi/m3) 0.022 0.176 (15/310) C18 0.260 (3/52) 0.148 (2/52) 0 (0.020-0.620) (0.050-0.620) (0.042-0.254) l I> 1
)
1
- - - - Pt t WN
TABLE III - 1 (Con't) ENVIROISEENTAL RADIOLOGICAL 800NITORING PROGRAM SUBWt&RY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86 - 12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE & NO. LLD ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION HER Air Part. (PCI/1000 M3) Gamma Air Inhalation Analysis 24 O CE-144 12.79 ND (O/8) --- --- 1 BA-LA-140 14.83 ND (O/8) --- --- TH-232 0.34 1.59 (8/8) C47 2.05 (4/4) 2.05 (4/4)
; (0.56-5.43) (0.56-5.43) (0.56-5.43) ; RA-226 0.40 1.33 (8/8) C41 1.43 (4/4) 1.22 (4/4)
, (0.62-2.61) (0.62-2.61) (0.65-2.17) t i CS-134 1.58 6.35 (6/24) C40 8.30 (1/4) 2.75 (1/4)
; (2.75-8.30) . (8.30-8.30) (2.75-2.75)
RU-106 1.91 ND (O/8) --- --- . CS-137 1.55 7.76 (10/24) C46 15.90 (1/4) 1.62 (4/4) ] (0.22-15.90) (0.36-0.50) (0.22-5.75) ZR-NB-95 0.35 ND (O/8) MN-54 0.20 0.20 (1/8) C47 0.20 (1/4) 0.20 (1/4) l (0.20-0.2O) (0.20-0.2O) (0.20-0.2O) ZN-65 O.45 ND (O/8) --- --- t
TABLE III-2 AIR INHALATION Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) Grocs Beta ALL O.026 0.008 ---- NA C41 ---- 0.003 0.435 NA C47 (1) ---- 0.002 0.021 NA Iodine - 131 ALL <O.176 0.022 ---- 0.90 C18 ---- 0.003 0.62O(2) o,90 C47(1) ---- 0.005 0.254 0.90 (1) Control Station j (2) Sampled during the week following the Chernobyl incident l i 20 i
TABLE III-2 (Con't) AIR INHALATION Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) CE-144 ALL <LLD 1.28E-2 LLD NA BA-La-140 ALL (LLD 1.48E-2 LLD NA TH-232 ALL 1.59E-3 3.4E-4 ---- NA C47(1) ---- 2.3E-4 5.43E-3 NA RA-226 ALL 1.33E-3 4.OE-4 ---- NA C41 ---- 5.2E-4 2.61E-3 NA C47(1) ---- 2.8E-4 2.17E-3 NA CS-134 ALL 6.35E-3 1.58E-3 ---- 10 C40 ---- 6.90E-3 8.30E-3 C47(1) ---- 1.3E-3 2.75E-3 RU-106 ALL <LLD 1.91E-3 (LLD NA CS-137 ALL 7.76E-3 1.55E-3 ---- 20 C-46 ---- 6.6E-3 1.59E-2 20 C47(1) ---- 1.3E-4 5.7E-3 20 MN-54 ALL 2.06E-4 2.OE-4 ---- NA C47(1) ---- 2.OE-4 2.OE-4 NA ZR-NB-95 ALL (LLD 3.5E-4 (LLD NA ZN-65 ALL <LLD 4.50E-4 (LLD NA (1) Control Station S 21
ale- _~_
.__ .-- FIGURE-111-1 '-- -- - -
1-. _ '___.._ _. . _ _ ~. _ _ - 2 ._ _ _ _ . _
~ ~ - ' ' - ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~
10~1 t_ _ . . . . _ __ t i 1 I .___ _ , . . - __ . _ - - - .- - .. . _ ._. __.__._~ .
.-._-.w .gs _44-.p .eg- .ig.---. +--.__ .--ei. e. -.+. -_,em.. .-.w._-4 --% . _4 _
h .- ..aw_ .= .-_ - , - - - - a -. -_._. - -- ___. . - _ - _ - _ - -_..- - L __ - _ - _
- t. . _ ._
l __ - . . . . ;_. q._ ___-_.t_._
- - -- - - = -
10-2
=-- -- ,- - - -
3 - (. - 7--
,- . . _. _ _ _ _ ___. . .__. .. t _
.t . _ - _ .
m ,
-O 8 . _
)
u (___ 4__ _ _
-- - ~ ---
O. -_ .__ ._ _. . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _.- .___ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . , .__.____.__.., ._ __ _- . _ - ___ ___. . _ - ._. ...___.._.___._.-.L______.___ __ t ._ _ .._ -._ _ .__-.. -- _.. --._ .--_z__.__.-_ _ .- _ _.__. _ . - _ . . . 10-3
- -~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~-- - - - ~
i_ _ ._..-- - - _. _
.-__ _a - -. _ .
._ u (
1 __ . _i . . _.__L_. - ._ _ . . . . . __._ .t . __ E 5 1 4 . . ) _ (. __ _ ._._ __._j _ __._._.-_{ , _ _ _ . ___ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . - - _ _ _ _ E t p_ ._~ ___ __ . _ __ _ __..
. t.
^
, i h
~~+ ~ ~ ~
10~4
.- . _ _ _ . . - ._ .i -__-_ .
, t
, ~. . . . ._
.. 4 _.. u _ _ _ _.
L
?. . . - _ _ - _. b- %- . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - . . _ . _.
._1 --
A I - 131 O cs 134- - - - - - - -- - O cs-137 - O ce-i44 .
~
~
w ..i..m 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 i m 41 4.een, men y
SEAWATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze sea-water samples. The control Station, C13, is located at the mouth of the intake canal. This pathway involves two types of analyses, monthly gamma spectral analysis.and quarterly tritium composite. Monthly Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. Ouarterly Tritium Analysis (ComDosite) All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded, t
\
r
; f 23 i is, i. ,
TABLE III - 3 ENVIROlW8 ENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGIPAft SUBWIARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86 - 12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE & NO. M ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION MER Sea Water (PCI/L) Gamma Analysis 36 0 i BA-LA-140 6.0 ND (O/36) --- --- I-131 3.5 3.3 (1/36) C13 3.3 (1/12) 3.3 (1/36) (3.3-3.3) (3.3-3.3) (3.3-3.3) N . CS-134 2.5 ND (O/36) --- --- FE-59 4.7 ND (O/36) --- --- CS-137 2.8 4.8 (12/36) C14H 5.6 (3/12) 4.8 (12/36) (2.6-7.1) (3.5-7.1) (2.6-7.1) ZR-NB-95 2.9 ND (O/36) --- --- ~ NN-54 2.5 2.7 (2/36) C13 3.0 (1/12) 2.7 (2/36) (2.3-3.0) (3.0-3.0) (2.3-3.0) ! ZN-65 5.4 ND (O/36) --- --- CO-58 2.4 ND (O/36) CO-60 2.6 ND (O/36) --- ---
3 TABLE III - 3 (Con't) ENVIROINENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUISEART CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 ] CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86 - 12/31/86 i - 1 PATHWAY TYPE & MO. M ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATIOI( CONTROL LOCATION MBR i S a Water (PCI/L) Tritium Analysis 36 O H-3 837.0 713.5 (1/35) C14G 713.5 (1/12) 713.5 (3/36) (713.5-713.5) (713.5-713.5) (713.5-713.5) l l l 1 l i i
TABLE III-4 SEAWATER Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) BA-LA-140 ALL <LLD 6.0 (LLD 200 FE-59 ALL <LLD 4.7 (LLD 400 C13(1) I-131 ALL 3.3 3.5 ---- NA C13(1) ---- 3 3.3 NA CS-134 ALL <LLD 2.5 (LLD 30 CS-137 ALL 4.8 2.8 ---- 50 C13(1) ---- 3 5 50 C14H ---- 4.0 -7.1 50 ZR-NB-95 ALL <LLD 2.9 (LLD 400 CO-58 All (LLD 2.4 <LLD 1000 (1) Control Station 26
TABLE III-4 (Con't) SEAWATER Sampling Highest Porcaeter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) MN-54 ALL 2.7 2.5 ---- 1000 C13(1) ---- 3.0 3.0 1000 ZN-65 ALL <LLD 5.4 (LLD 300 CO-60 ALL <LLD 2.6 ---- 300 H-3 ALL 713.5 837.0 ---- 30,000 C14G ---- 700 713.5 30,000 C13(1) ---- 995 <LLD 30,000 (1) Control Station 27 . I
sa I __.__.-~_--... . _ _ _ _ . _ . FIGURE-III-2 - - - - - -
-~ ~--~~'
.._ _ _ ___.-SEAMATER 1RICIIDE~ TRENDS
. _ _ ._. .- ~-
i 3.___ __ _.' __ g _ 103 a
- -. _ , . . . _. _. . - - - - _. ~ _ _ _ _ . _. __ __ . . _ _ . - -.
___. _ ._..___..___p_._~_____ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ ._.y_. ._ A _ _ ___ _ _ { s . _ . _ _ _ t -- u_.___ l , 102 l - - - - - -
-- - - - - - -- - - - - - "- - - - h - - - - - - - = - l' - - -- -
c 3 . _ _ . .
' -_ .. u 1..____. _. ._j ___ 4 _. .a.
, l ,
1 l. _ j -;. .
- j. ,
-F _
;.__._____ f
_ .._.- [_. - p__.-__~.__-____ ~3.3 Ja . ._ _ i -'---.
- i
' L s _ i . _ _ ___ ,
- 1 _ _.
g, 1 .__ . . _ _ -._ . i 7__7____.__-- ___ .__ . 3 a_ . ._ ._ _ _ -; _ _ - _ _ 1 _w '
- ---,--------"---------j---*----_
101 , 3 _ . - . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - _ . _..___= g__. _ .._. . _ _+. __ _. _ __ %_ _ _ g . .
. I i
1 i e
. . , , - _ . ____ ___ .___. ._ _ - _ _m ----. ._ -
. . Y_N _ - _ _? __N l
i 3 3 O H-3 l A t - 131 O cs-134 _O__c s -137 __ _ i 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987-t 28 l - _ _
GROUND WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze the ground water samples. Since the ground water flow around the Crystal River site flows toward the Gulf of Mexico and the plant is located on the coast, there is very little chance for contam-ination of the ground water supply. Therefore, there is only one station in this pathway, and it is considered to be a control type station. This pathway involves two types of analyses, semiannual gamma spectral analysis and semiannual tritium analysis. Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. Semiannual Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years's operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. 29
TABLE III - 5 ENVIROISEENTAL RADIOLOGICAL 900NITORING PROGRADE SUBWIARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 PATHWAY IXEE & ' NO . LLD ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION HER , Ground Water (PCI/L) Gamma Analysis 2 O BA-LA-140 6.5 (LLD (0/2) --- --- FE-59 9.5 (LLD (O/2) --- --- I-131 7.5 <LLD (0/2) --- --- g CS-134 4.5 (LLD (0/2) --- --- CS-137 4.5 (LLD (O/2) --- --- ZR-NB-95 8.5 (LLD (O/2) --- --- CO-58 4.0 (LLD (O/2) --- --- NN-54 4.5 (LLD (0/2) --- --- ZN-65 9.5 <LLD (0/2) --- --- CO-60 4.0 <LLD (0/2) --- --- I
TABLE III - 5 (cont'd) ENVIROISIENTAL RADIOLOGICAL IGONITORING PROGRAM SUISEARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET 900. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE & NO. LLD ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION HER Ground Water (PCI/L) Tritium Analysis 2 O H-3 200.0 <LLD (O/2) --- --- N l i
TABLE III-6 GROUNDWATER Sampling Highest Parcaeter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (Pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) B2-La-140 C-40 <LLD 6.5 (LLD 200 Fo-59 C-40 (LLD 9.5 (LLD 400 I-131 C-40 (LLD 7.5 (LLD NA Cs-134 C-40 (LLD 4.5 <LLD 30 Co-137 C-40 <LLD 4.5 (LLD 50 Zr-Nb-95 C-40 (LLD 8.5 (LLD 400 Co-58 C-40 <LLD 4.0 (LLD 1000 Mn-54 C-40 (LLD 4.5 (LLD 1000 Zn-65 C-40 (LLD 9.5 <LLD 300 Co-60 C-40 (LLD 6.0 (LLD 300 H-3 C-40 (LLD 200 <LLD 30,000 32
4 a. . , .- _, , A
'~ Z '._. J . ._._ TTT_ _ ______ ._ _ ~ pid[ tire-IIIJ.T
. -l- - O mm.my y - - - . . . - .
_ .. - .~ . _ . .,_ . . _ _ - . _ . _ _ _ _ .
...-,,,.e+_ m ._. . . . - . . _ _ . __. . , _ .
j _
* . . . . -- _ _ . - _ . . -- .--_w.. _ _ . _ . . - . , . . - . _ . e - - - . . .
102
. - - - - > - - --i.-- --_ .w+ ~- - - - g _ . .
.9 -
4
.i.~._-...-_.p f._. .- .,
#e.,.4. _ - _ _y..-_,_
___-,.,n
- --,.n.
. _ - - . _. . ..h._.___..
.-- ... . . _ . . _ _ _ _ - - - -..-__.__w,._ -
..m p_.. _ _ . . _,
_ . .,, . . . _ _ __2 _ _ _ . I Q _
~' '
5 _.
, .. .. -_. . - . . . . .. _ = . . . . __. _. _ - _ . . . . - - . - . ._. . .
7 101 I-- ;
-M = - - -
- - - * - - - - b --*- -- - -
3 i , i - r .__-- ;
.._______-ip .. _ _ _ a l- .- _ .$ ,_._ { _. _ ;_ ___ g
_. } : - --- - - i --~
~. ; J 7 _
{ t'-- t ._. - {_
- g g. --
A - .4
= . - .z. i _
H.. ___ _.. _ _ . _ _ _ -. _ ___._____[ _ _ . _. . _ _ . -
. l___....__._,_-
__.4._.__ _. _r ., , o __ __
- j. 3
_ & __ i a . t _ i
%g i i __
*F" $ ._ _ .
I _ __ a . ,
, i i I
--e- -+ - - - - .
_m.w. 3 . . _ . _ . ___ . . _. p .- - - ~ _ _ _ _ __ g . 9 100
._ ..__- _L.. ._.__+.....1 __. _ _ ._b_ _ .L -
' ~- '
i h '
. i . __
j _ _[ - - = ' 'G 9
._.{_
A. . 1 a_. g 4 -4
- - - . ..-.-e. -#_,-- .- -_ _4- - - - . - - . . . - - .
- - .w o e. ,ip.-
-.4-,-. . . - . - - - - - - , . ~ -->--_-_-,-----.-e- __ . . -
_. . .- _ _ . ~ _ _. - - - . ..- . _ - 10-1 O H-3 A I - 131 O cs-i34 , O cs- 37 _ __ ._ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ 1980 1981 1984 1985 1986 1987 _1982_ _ .__ 198g
DRINKING WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze potable water samples. The ground and aquifer water flows around the Crystal River site is toward the Gulf of Mexico and the plant is located on the coast. Therefore, there is little chance of contamination of drinking water supplies due to plant operations. The three sample stations are considered to be control type stations, due to the above criteria, and are monitored by means of gamma spectral analysis on a quarterly basis. Ouarterly Gamma Analysis
. All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded.
Semiannual Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. 34
4 TABLE III - 7 i I
- ENVIROIWEENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUISEARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE h NO. LI& Ar.T. LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION HER i
Drinking Water j (PCI/L) Gamma
- Analysis 12 O 1
i BA-LA-140 4.9 ND (O/12) --- --- ! FE-59 3.9 ND (O/12) --- --- 4 ) I-131 0.8 ND (1/12) --- ---
$ CS-134 2.3 ND (O/12) --- ---
! CS-137 2.5 3.1 (1/12) C10 3.1 (1/4) 3.1 (1/12) ! (3.1-3.1) (3.1-3.1) (3.1-3.1)
! ZR-NB-95 2.5 ND (0/12) --- ---
I CO-58 2.1 ND (O/12) --- --- i NN-54 2.0 ND (O/12) --- --- 'l ZN-65 5.0 ND (O/12) --- --- CO-60 2.1 ND (O/12) --- --- 1 i i i 4
TABLE III - 7 (Con't) ENVIROISENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUBWEARY I CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 i ! PATHWAY TYPE & NO. M ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAM LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION HER Drinking Water (PCI/L) Tritium Analysis 12 O H-3 826.3 ND (O/12) i W I O i i i l 1 l
TABLE III-8 DRINKING WATER Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) (pci/L) BA-LA-140 ALL <LLD 5.2 (LLD 200 FE-59 ALL <LLD 3.8 (LLD 400 I-131 ALL <LLD O.8 <LLD 2 CS-134 ALL <LLD 2.3 (LLD 30
~
CS-137 C07(1) <LLD 2.6 (LLD 50
. C10(1) 3.1 2.1 3.1 50 C18(1) (LLD 2.6 (LLD 50 ZR-NB-95 ALL <LLD 2.5 (LLD 400 I
CO-58 ALL <LLD 2.1 (LLD 1000 MN-54 ALL <LLD 2.0 (LLD 1000 ZN-65 ALL <LLD 5.0 (LLD 300 CO-60 ALL <LLD 2.1 (LLD 300 l l H-3 ALL (LLD 826.3 (LLD 2000 (1) Control Station 37 l
FIGURE III-4 arfm DRINKING WATER NUCLIDE TRENDS _ 1 :._ _. -
}u
. ~ .. .a 4- ___
l ' _ _ /_.__:_ .-._ _
/
-t _ /_
f , _\,' e . .
/. . ~ . _ . , . . ._ . .
G . - - - _ _ . _ , - / _[ _ _ . e 4 1___ ___.-___.. _ _ - _ _ _ . . _ __.-. _._.___ _.. e I t __ - - _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ a_.-_.-___.-.___.- -_ _ 6
. I-s_ . . _ _
. , _ . . _ . . . _ _ . _ i.___. - _ . - - _ _ _ _ :_ _ .
r-4_ . _ _ . , _w._. _ . _ _ - - - . _ _ _ . - _ ~- - . - - .. . . .
. . . . _ .. _. . _ 2;. _ ._.__.-_L____'_._.. : ._-. -, .i.-[...._. -__.- -. ? - _ .....-____.__ __
. . l ~t ,
.-. __.. . ..-.._ ___ .., , & _ 4 g -- 4 4 . ; .- t
' t 4 i U _.__ _ - . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ - - _ _ ._.
n A ___ 9r a . 3 g ._ . ._. _ . 2_ . _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ ,
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ - ~~~~ ~ ~ ^
100 ,
- n. _
[.-_________u....-___-_ L^ -- ~t -
-. - _ a - .-
j- -
.___[-'_.- '
.- _- -- _._ --t, _
q _. _ - , __ 4 _ i i , i ' i ,____ _ _ _ . .
, , 7 e t i .
I $ _
.._y . _ _ . _ . _ . _ ._
_9 - - _ __ I_ _ . _ . . . . _ . _ _ . - _ . . 10-1
~ ~ ~ - - ~
~ ~ . ~ - ~~~ ~ ;~ 'I~~ - ' --~~" I~ ~ - ' _7- F i
=~ ~
3 _._ _
-t ! i
+
,' - _.___.t.__-
7
.n ,
O H-3 ;_ -
- _: . [
g , , ,3, ____--g___. . _..__-__7 _ _ _ _ O Cs-134 , ! i ~; d
- I- '
. O cs-i37-
+mi . d980 1981 1982 1983 1984 19'85 19'86 19'87
- i. > am i ni . , n. ,,x n g
SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENT PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shoreline external sediment samples. The Control Station for this pathway is C09. Gamma spectral analysis is performed on each sample on a semiannual frequency. Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. 9 39
TABLE III "r ENVIROISEENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUBGEARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 PATHMAY TYPE & 'O. N M ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAM LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION M Shoreline Sed. (PCI/KG) Gamma Analysis 8 O BA-LA-140 9.9 ND (O/8) --- --- l TH-232 11.7 86.8 (8/8) C14H 109.5 (2/2) 76.5 (2/2) (45.7-140.0) (103.0-116.0) (64.3-88.6) I-131 4.9 ND (0/8) --- --- RA-226 9.7 587.3 (8/8) C14H 852.0 (2/2) 157.0 (2/2) (147.O-1010.O) (694.0-1010.O) (147.O-167.0) CS-134 4.2 ND (O/8) --- --- RU-106 36.0 ND (0/8) --- --- CS-137 5.1 18.1 (2/8) C14N 32.2 (1/2) 4.1 (1/2) (4.1-32.2) (32.2-32.2) (4.1-4.1) ZR-NB-95 5.6 ND (O/8) --- --- NN-54 4.1 ND (0/8) --- --- ZN-65 9.1 ND (O/8) --- --- i K-40 44.7 315.1 (8/8) C14H 444.5 (2/2) 205.5 (2/2) ] (183.0-593.0) (297.O-592.0) (203.0-208.0)
TABLE III-10 SHORELINE SEDIMENT Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (Pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) BA-LA-140 ALL <LLD 9.9 (LLD NA TH-232 ALL 86.6 11.7 ---- NA C14H ---- 2.3 140.0 NA C09(1) ---- 11 88.6 NA I-131 ALL <I LD 4.9 (LLD NA RA-226 ALL 587.3 9.7 ---- NA C14H ---- 7 1010.0 NA C09(1) ---- 5 167.0 NA CS-134 ALL <LLD 4.2 (LLD NA RU-106 ALL <LLD 36.0 (LLD NA CS-137 ALL 18.1 5.1 ---- NA
- C09(1) ----
10 32.2 NA l ZR-NB-95 ALL (LLD 5.6 (LLD NA l (1) Control Station l 41 i l
- - - ~~ c ' ~ ' - - - * -- - - ~ ' - - - " - " ' - - - ' ' - ' '
TABLE III-10 (Con't) SHORELINE SEDIMENT Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) Mn-54 ALL <LLD 4.1 <LLD NA Zn-65 ALL <LLD 9.1 (LLD NA K-40 ALL 315.1 44.7 ---- NA C14M ---- 89 592 -tUL C09(1) ---- 39 203 NA (1) Control Station I o I 42
...^5^
2
, FIGUREbIII-5' - -
7
- - i
(---. --- : : =: k . _ t
-r- [. . h- -- ::. - = : - ; ..
a
._.i_____:f._ _ _ . _,h._ _ _ _ _ _ p_ _ _ _ r
- f. -._ n 2 .L. _. - 4 f
- i
_. . n i t . . g.
- p. - -
; 4 102 .
t t_._ . _ __ j-
} __ .-}
. , . } }
, +
i ! .' i: i h i
-[,- ,
s ,
. _ _ _ __. _ l. . _ __w s
.j
__}.. 1 g. , . 4
._ p . .. _j __
9
,9 l
_r. q_..._.-.-
. .- _ . . 9, _ ~l._ .p
- i. f i. , d
~
3_
- I I
. .M
- 4 ! l e_ -
r ! .
.! .j- .-i- j - --i_ -- -
1____ f 5 : a _ _ _ _; (_: j_1_ _ 1 L- 1- .__ _ __ _.__ __._.. q 4 . . i g __
~+
. ~
1
-'-- ~ ---~~I.1 2
10 -t + _. ; 2_. _ m { u; ['~~-- , 3 +. _; . .. .u : u_ , 1 ;_ :_c
- _ :- . g --. :_ r : - - - -
- m:-tr-- _: 1 {--- . .
w_. 3
,, . ____3.__.._
. _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . -- _ _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ = . _ _ - . _ _ _ . .
1 r-
. . _ . _ _. 1 ' En.z.
._ ._ '_.r*_ . _. _ . .. _ _ _; !.; T :_ _ _ . _ - ,'
_. .cn_.___.t_____:___.__.~_.-'-- _--_.c.- 7
.-__v_. . _ . _ . - _ -
- . _ . . _ . + - -{.-._.. . _ _ _ _ _ 7 _- .. _ _
_.._ +..p__;____--.h_. _ _ . . . h . .. .-- _.
._7
___ . _ . p _ .. - - - -
.__..______7_. ______
60
.2 N ,
. +___
i m _.
.._.--.-.-..--_3..__-.-__..-_.t x
i n_ __L.__. a
\ ' '
/
$a C , ~__ __._ ' _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ -
/-
4._
, l 5 .
l L i 1-/.
- ~
1 t
- t. .. : ,.. - . . .
- ../ _ , ,
y
/ - ' '
.._ _ _ L _ _ q . . _q .4 2 -.- __ _ , _ ! ___ .. [..
L_ . _'_ s- ' ' 100
- - - - I, 1 Y t- . T
+ -- 1
--i !
+
i-..- \ ::::. _ ._ . . _ .
; . I
-_.__._L._._.-.__;' ~ . ~ _ ~. ~-
_ ___ . ._ . . 4, ; - . - . ._ y- _ _; ._ _
, m.. __ - _ . - -. . . ! _== _. ._ : _ b_ _= - :=7 _ : m. n. c. . ,
_ =ET_ _ -!?T
= - E. _ . . -.9 ~ -- ! _a - ~
i !;-_.. .;. _ . ._ ~_ *_ _ i E F__ 7 t _..p-.__ __ _ ..___: ._ _ . _ . - _ . _ , m
- qr.. _
, . . - . - --__ -. .- __ _ (- -~
.._.._I_.__.-__.
._ - _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . . z I - - __I'. '
g
- I '
L s__ .-.: s v- - ,
.y [
._ 4
- 'f
~
*~2-u- _ cf; . _a - - - ;' i _ ,
S __ _ . l l p . _ . ______._p-__ _1_. n_p_ __ . _.u_ L _-_ __.j_ p_ . - .
-l
~ ---
j t , $ N
-w - _ = t, s... " - - - '-
-p 10-1 v._ =_-L -
._t f t 4-
+
3__ , _ - ; _ p - . __ ~_ { , -_j ; - - _ - l -i- - -- . . j n . : d:--iY _] ,
-________T----_ ._
__. __. { .- , _ _ _ , _ _ _
----t=-~---
.3- = == t . ---.==---.::== ;:
__...__;_.__ i
.. . - - _ 4_ _.
. i. _ . _ .
. _a: _. .=. - =-2 _ _ p:. ._ : ._: t - ::. - T: pz .2.
1 _t l_._..._.... . , _ _ _ . . , , t._ .--. 3 g ,3, .
. __ . . . . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ 7. . - - _ _ , p. _ _.
O MM : t ~ f-
, 7.'_'_-__'.~__~y.----~~~~t-- .
, - - - -+~~~-'~{-~~~ - - -
O cs-137 -r -- r-
-t l ~ ~
1987.
~
l wm..i M&O 19'81 1982 1983 1984 1985 19'86 I ma o i nn. in.n 43
i l l l INGESTION PATHWAY f f'ARNIVOROUS FISH) The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze carnivorous fish. The control Station for this pathway is c30. ; Gamma spectral analysis is performed quarterly on carnivorous fish. Ouarterly Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. e 44 __ _ . . - . - , . . _ . , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . ._.y -. , - _ - _ _ . _ _ - - - . - , . . _ _ , _ - _ . , , - - - , - . _ _ _,
TABLE III - 11 ENVIROIWEENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUBGEARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE & NO. M AT T. LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION . HER CARN. FISH
- (PCI/KG) Gamma Analysis 8 O
BA-LA-140 12.9 ND (O/8) --- --- FE-59 12.6 ND (0/8) --- --- j I-131 7.0 ND (O/8) --- --- , a d' i CS-134 5,6 ND (0/8) --- --- i CS-137 6.6 13.8 (8/8) C30 15.9 (4/4) 15.9 (4/4) (6.O-31.6) (7.9-31.6) (7.9-31.6) ZR-NB-95 6.5 ND (0.8) --- --- CO-58 6.1 ND (O/8) --- --- MN-54 5.9 ND (0.8) --- --- ZN-65 14.5 ND (0/8) --- --- CO-60 6.4 ND (0.8) --- --- t , K-40 78.8 3225.0 (8/8) C29 3362.5 (4/4) 3087.5 (4/4) (2640.0-4010.0) (2710.0-4010.0) (2640.0-3630.O) l l l l
l l TABLE III-12 CARNIVOROUS FISH Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) BA-LA-140 ALL <LLD 12.9 <LLD NA FE-59 ALL <LLD 12.6 <LLD 10000 I-131 ALL <LLD 7.0 (LLD NA CS-134 ALL <LLD 5.6 (LLD 1000 CS-137 ALL 13.8 6.6 ---- 2000 C30(1) --- 9.3 31.6 2000 ZR-NB-95 ALL <LLD 6.5 (LLD NA CO-58 ALL <LLD 6.1 (LLD 30000 MN-54 ALL <LLD 5.9 <LLD 30000 ZN-65 ALL <LLD 14.5 (LLD 20000 CO-60 ALL <LLD 6.4 <LLD 10000 K-40 ALL 3225 78.8 ---- NA C29 ---- 60.9 4010.0 NA C30(1) ---- 76.3 3630.0 NA (1) Control Station 46
"2l* _ _ , _ . _ .
._ _ . . _ _ ~ ___ .. . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ .
-FIGURE III-6-- .
~ INGESTION PATEUAT~(CARNIVOROUS ~ FISH)'NUCLIDE TRENDS
] )) }'~^ ~
c___ - _ . _ _ - . _ _ . . - - _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ . _ . _ . - - . - . ._. _ 102 _ .. . . - . - - _ . . _ -._ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ . . A 101 , __(*__.._.. _ _ - _ _ _ __ __..__ _ _ _ . oo ,
$u :_
O= _.. ._ ._____ __ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _--~__-..._.._-- _
- .g ._ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ $ g_. _
100 e 4__ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ 10-1 t A l - 131 O cs-134
. iO cs-is7 W M 980 n . m.u . , , , , ~ , "'
19'81 1982 19'83 1984 198'S 1986 19'87 47
INGESTION PATHWAY (OYSTERS) The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze oyster samples. The control Station for this pathway is C30. Gamma spectral analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. Quarterly Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational data. There are no limits for oysters listed in the Technical Specifications. 4 9 l l . i 1 l l i l 48
l TABLE III - 13 i ENVIROlWEENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUBWIART CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE & NO. LLQ AT T. LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION MBR I OYSTERS (PCI/KG) Gamma Analysis 8 0 BA-LA-140 12.3 ND (O/8) --- --- 1 FE-59 10.7 ND (0/8) --- I-131 6.9 ND (O/8) ---
- CS-134 5.2 ND (O/8) --- ---
CO-58 5.2 7.2 (2/8) C29 8.4 (1/4) 6.0 (1/4) (6.O-8.4) (8.4-8.4) (6.O-6.0) CO-60 5.4 10.0 (2/8) C30 14.1 (1/4) 14.1 (1/4) (5.9-14.1) (14.1-14.1) (14.1-14.1)
- CS-137 6.9 8.3 (1/8) C30 3.3 (1/4) 8.3 (1/4)
(8.3-8.3) (8.3-8.3) (8.3-8.3) ZR-NB-95 7.1 6.0 (1/8) C29 6.0 (1/4) ND (O/4) (6.O-6.0) (6.0-6.0) MN-54 5.5 ND (O/8) --- ZN-65 12.0 ND (O/8) --- --- K-40 64.2 1728.8 (8/8) C29 1897.5 (4/4) 1560 (4/4)
'l (1280.0-2190.0) (1730.0-2190.0) (1280.0-2040.0)
TABLE III-14 OYSTERS Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) BA-LA-140 ALL (LLD 12.3 (LLD NA FE-59 ALL <LLD 10.7 (LLD NA I-131 ALL <LLD 6.9 (LLD NA CS-134 ALL (LLD 5.2 (LLD NA CO-58 ALL 7.2 5.2 NA C29 ---- 3.7 8.4 C30(1) ---- 4.3 6.0 NA CO-60 ALL 10.0 5.4 ---- NA C30(1) ---- 7.6 14.1 NA CS-137 ALL 8.3 6.9 ---- NA C30(1) ---- 5.0 8.3 NA ZR-NB-95 ALL 6.0 7.1 ---- NA C29 ---- 5.1 6.0 NA C30(1) ---- 10.1 (LLD NA MN-54 ALL <LLD (LLD NA l ZN-65 ALL <LLD (LLD NA K-40 ALL 1728.8 64.2 NA C29 ---- 75.1 2190.0 NA C3O(1) ---- 46.8 2040.0 NA (1) Control Station 50
a i1 4, < 0 FIGURE III-7 ( C
~
_S$ ~ . _ . __ L _ . _ INGESTION ^ PATHWAY-(0YSTERS)'NUCLIDE' TRENDS ] ( . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ __ _. . _ _ . _
' __. .__._________.a _.. :_.___ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . __ _ _ . . . _
102 5 9" 7 i 101 ___..___-p. I/ ~
~
.M *
]o --
+ - - ---
D. . .. _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ . . _ __ 4
.a. . .. _ _ _ _ _ - . - -. . . . - . _ . _ . . - _ _ _ .
- j. 100 M$ _.
i
. . ?. _ _ ___.._l._______. _. _. - - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - . . _ . - - _ . . , .
; b
' s
- r' !
l _.,....-_A___.,._,-_.. , -, _ _ ~ _ - _ , . -n._ . ._ _ _. . _ , _4_.._.--._..-- . _ _ ._. , . _ _ _ . ..
- _ y .__. _ . . _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . __ __. _ __ _
a n- -
> __ . - ._. -. -__ i -._.._ - . . . - - _ _ - - _ _
10-1 , . .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
? ,
i A l - 131 O cs-137 ~
~
19'7
~ ~
.,,.-1980' ' 1981 19'82 1983 d984 19'85 L986 8
. ^
51
INGESTIONS PATHWAY (CITRUS) The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze the citrus samples. There is no Control Station for this pathway. Citrus is collected on an annual basis during harvest, and a gamma spectral analysis performed. Annual cm--- Analysis i No sample was collected; fruit was unavailable due to severe freeze Jamage to trees in recent years. l 52
INGESTION PATHWAY (WATERMELON) The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze watermelon samples. There is no control station for this pathway. Annual Gamma Analysis The sample was collected and analyzed. There is no critical station in this pathway. t a 53
,e.. . , - - , - - - _ _ - - - . - , . , , - - , . , , - ,
, _ - . - - _ - , , , ----.,----,---,-,--.r- - - - - - . . , , - ,
TABLE III - 15 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUDDIARY
\
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86-12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE h NO. LLQ ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION HER watermelon Gamma (PCI/KG) Analysis 1 O Ingestion l I-131 12.0 (LLD (O/1) CS-134 6.0 <LLD (O/1) i CS-137 7.0 <LLD (O/1)
TABLE III-16 WATERMELON Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) I-131 C04 (LLD 12.0 (LLD 100 CS-134 C04 (LLD 6.0 <LLD 1000 CS-137 C04 15.0 7.0 15.0 2000 O e p 55
FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (GRFFM LFAFY VEGETATION) The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze broad leaf vegetation. The sample station, C48 A and B, are located in the north and northeast by north direction at the Site boundary. These locations were picked due to the FSAR historical annual average D/Q values at the closest point to the Plant the general population could approach. The control Station for this pathway is C47. Monthly gamma spectral and I-131 analyses are performed on the samples. The samples are composed of three types of broad leaf vegetation from each location when available. Monthly Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. Monthly I-131 Analysis All camples were collected and analyzed. The data is consistent with previous years' operational values. No limits or LLDs were exceeded. 56
TABLE III - 17 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUISEARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86 - 12/31/86 PATHWAY TYPE b NO. LLQ ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION NRR Vegetation Gamma (pCi/kg) Analysis 36 3 BA-LA-140 (O/36) 17.9 ND --- --- TH-232 17.6 64.2 (36/36) C47 81.1 (12/12) 81.1 (12/12) (19.7-196.0) (33.2-191.0) (33.2-191.0) I-131 10.5 489.8 (5/36) C48b 925.0 (1/12) 211.8 (2/12) (34.6-1060.0) (925.O-925.0) (34.6-389.0) RA-226 19.5 86.0 (35/36) C48b 94.2 (12/12) 72.9 (12/12) (22.2-308.0) (23.7-291.0) (27.9-178.0) ! CS-134 7.9 14.5 (2/36) C48a 16.7 (1/12) 12.3 (1/12) i (12.3-16.7) (16.7-16.7) (12.3-12.3) 4 RU-106 68.0 104.1 (2/36) C48b 104.1 (2/12) ND (O/12) (82.1-126.0) (82.1-126.0) CS-137 9.4 24.2 (29/36) C48b 27.1 (10/12) 21.9 (9/12) (8.8-46.2) (13.8-46.2) (8.8-38.7) 3 ZR-NB-95 8.6 ND (O/36) --- --- MN-54 8.0 ND (0/36) --- --- ZN-65 18.8 ND (0/36) --- --- l K-40 126.4 2835.6 (36/36) C47 3975.0 (12/12) 3975.0 (12/12) (852.0-7300.0) (3250.0-4990.0) (3250.0-4990.0)
TABLE III-18 BROAD LEAF VEGETATION Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (Pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) BA-LA-140 ALL <LLD 17.9 <LLD NA TH-232 ALL 64.2 17.6 ---- NA C48a ---- 36 196.0 NA C47(1) ---- 24 191.0 NA I-131 ALL ---- 10.5 ---- 100 C48a ---- 9 1060.0 100 C47(1) ---- 11 389 100 RA-226 ALL 86.0 19.5 ---- NA . C48a ---- 30 308.0 NA C47(1) ---- 17 178.0 NA CS-134 ALL 14.5 7.9 ---- 1000 C48b ---- 5 16.7 1000 C47(1) ---- 7 12.3 1000 RU-106 ALL 104.1 68.0 ---- NA C48b ---- 77 126.0 NA C47(1) ---- 103 <LLD NA CS-137 All 24.2 12.0 ---- 2000 C48b ---- 10 46.2 2000 C47(1) ---- 12 38.7 2000 (1) Control Station 58
TABLE III-18 (Cont'd) BROAD LEAF VEGETATION Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) ZR-95 ALL <LLD 8.6 <LLD NA MN-54 ALL <LLD 8.0 (LLD NA ZN-65 ALL <LLD 18.8 (LLD NA K-40 ALL 2835.6 126.4 ---- NA \ C48a ---- 766 7330.0 NA C47(1) ---- 89 4990.0 NA (1) Control Station 59
1 FIGURE III ~ FOOD CHAIN PATEWAY-(CEEEN LEAFY YEGETABLES) NUCLIDE TRENDS _] ' ~}
. ~ . . _ _ . . , . _ _ . _ . - - . . _ _ - . ~ . -
102 (. _ - - - .. -. e< . .,_m- e . .4 . e -.
~
101 3 _ _ . . _ - . - - - . . . . . - _ . - . . ... . _ ---. .- _- . _ .. - - - - . - . - , . = _ . - - eo R . - - . . _ _ _ . - . . - _ ... Q .- - _ .. - - - Q- _. . . . _ . _ _ . _ y [ _. - . . . . . - - . . . - . . -- 100
. _ . - _ _ _ --.- __...___L._-__ _.. _ . . _. _ _ . . .,
10-1 . . _ . . _ . . _ _ . - - _ . _ . . . _ . - _ _ .--____ _ ._. _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ A l - 131
.O cs-137 ~
. .m - 1980 19'81 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 60
IV. EXTERNAL RADIATION This category includes measurements of ambient radiation at numerous locations at the Site boundary ( O.83 miles), at 5 miles, and at the Control Station, C47, in Gainesville, Florida, 52 miles away, as required by Technical Specifications Section 3.12, Table 3.12-1. This section includes a data summary, data comparison, and a trend plot as described in Section III. External radiation measurements were performed continuously with quarterly collection, using TLDs. All TLDs were . collected and evaluated except for the fourth quarter TLD at station C75, which was missing at the time of collection. No limits are listed in Technical Specifications. The data is consistent with previously operational values. O 61
TABLE IV - 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUOWEARY
- CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/86 - 12/31/86 l
PATHWAY TYPE in NO. M ALL LOCATIONS HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION NRR i t Air Submersion I (crem/yr) External O i Radiation 120 15.0 37. (119/119) C71 49 (4/4) 39 (4/4) (9.-59.) (31.-56.) (22.-49.) l j m l 3 I i ? 2 1 l i i
TABLE IV-2 AIR SUBMERSION Sampling Highest Parameter Location Mean LLD Single Value Limit (area /yr) (area /yr) (area /yr) (aren/yr) Air Submersion ALL 37 15 ---- NA C65 ---- 15 59 NA C47(1) ---- 15 49 NA (1) Control Station 63
da FIGURE - IV-1-- -- - --- ~ -- 7_ gg , _ s.__ _ . _ _ _ . _ , . _ - _ - . _ . - ... _ . - . . - e ___ _ __ _ _ _ . ._ . . _ _ . . _._ _...___._L . _ 1._- . - . . - _ - - - - _ . _ . - _ - . ._.. . - . _ _ _ _. . . - _ 102 -
$ --e. _w.-
'_ .. . . - _ _ _ - _ . . , _ _ - . . , . --..s- . . .. . . . - . . . . - - - _ _ _ . - - - . - - . - - - - _ .
1 A t 5_ .
. - . . - - - - - - . . _ _ _ _ - _ _ . . - - -. .-n-_. -.
3 3 ._ _. ._________._.__. _ _ ..-. . _ _. __
~
. (. . i j 101 .
- ~ ~
' ~, ~ --
. . . - . _ y-. . . _. . . - . _ . . . '_.. _ - - _ - - _ . . ~ . %-..___..-' -- _
b-N 4
% +
N s o '
. . _ .. _. --. --.___.....__.a.___- - _
be a -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. - - . _ . - - _ ~ _ _ . . _ . _ - - - - - - . - ___ - .._ _ . . -
1 _ _ . . a { a t 2.__. . _ . . __. - - . . . - _ . _ ..._ _____ i 100 _ ,
.som,,. _ . . . - _ -. _ . . - - _ . _ . _ _
_. __. . _ _ _ , . . - . .L__ . -,. -, __ . . , , , m. . . _ _ _.
?- _. . . . _ _ _ . . . _
, t-1 .
._ap h- t 3
q , t
; y -._ _ . . . - - _.-- .
3_ _
.--_._..-4 '
. . -_- _ _ . . ! . _. _ t -
C . _ . . ._ . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . - _ . . . ._
~ ~~ ~ ~ - " ~ ~ ~
10-1 - -~ ~'~ 'T 3 _._ _ . . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _
. , t-L _ . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _
. i.
a t h "
+ ,
4 t' 1987
~
s na i . r71980 1981 1982 1983 1984 19'85 19'86 usu 3., ** 64 '
- QRY COMPARISONS The University of Florida and the State of Florida, Depart-ment of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS) participate in interlaboratory comparison programs. The results of these programs are summarized in Tables V-1 and V2.
65
TABLE V-1 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - EPA CROSS-CHECK - RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE
$80 TYPE COLLECT 10p IISULTS WITS MEM OF STD DA VALUE 3-SI6nt. MIW ACT i 4 AMLYSIS M!t It!URNED 3 MAL. DEV LIMIT
-l i i i i i l l l l-I CR-51/H2O 2- 1-06 2-25-E KI/L 30.3 2.9 38.0 18.4 2 C H 0/H20 2- 7-86 2-26-E Kl/L 16.7 1.5 18.0 7.6 1 TM-65/ICO 2- 7-86 2-25-N K!/L 35.3 3.1 40.0 11.0 4 IU-l M/H2O 2- 7-M 2-25-E K I/L 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.2 9 CS-134/ICO 2- 7-66 2-25-06 K1/L 24.0 1.0 30.0 11.0 6 CS-137/H2O 2- 7-% 2-36-06 K!/L 19.7 1.1 22.0 9.4 7 ALPH4/H2O 3-21 4 4-184 K1/L 13.7 2.1 15.0 10.4 8 8tf4/lc0 3-21-M 4-194 Kl/L 12.3 1.5 8.0 8.3 9 AI.PNAA00 1-24 4 2-214 KI/L 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.1 10 St!AACD l-24-M 2-21 4 K 1/L 12.0 0.0 7.0 5.5 +1 11 H-3/108 2-14 4 3-114 KI/L 4926.0 E29.1 5227.0 999.0 12 1-131/ mil # 2-29-% 3-31-M K!/L 8.7 1.1 9.0 5.2.
13 CR-51Mce 6- 6 4 6-2 H 6 K !/L 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 i 6- 6-06 6-2 H 6 K !/L 7.6 14 C H 0/N20 71.0 3.5 66.0 li ZH5M00 6- 6 4 6-204 KI/L 80.0 0.0 86.0 10.4 I Sample was analyzed on proportional counting system during repelr of normally used system. Resuming use of repaired system has resulted in greater accuracy, as Indicated in sample analysis results for Beta /H2O sample performed in late May (Collection Date, 5/23/86). Probable reason for error in January sample was operation of system at incorrect voltage setting. 66
--,y ,--_--__-,__._-__.-._~__y.,___.,,___,-,..,.-.,,,__,,,_..--,_r_,___ _ r--_,,,_._, m____,.v.__.-.,,.
TABLE V-1 (Cont'd) UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - EPA CROSS-CHECK - RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE SED TYPE COLLECTION RESULTS UNIIS afM Of SID EPA VALUE 3-51GMA MIN ACT 4 ANALYSIS DATE RETURNED 3 AEL. DB' LIMIT
-l ! I I I I I I I i 16 RU-l%/H2O 6- 6-86 6-20-36 KUL 60.7 4.0 50.0 21.0 I" C5-134/H2O 6- 6-% 6-20-86 KUL 4.3 1.1 49.0 7.0 16 C5-137/H2O 6- 6-86 6-20-86 KUL 10.7 1.1 10.0 6.0 18 DETA/H2O 5-23-N 6-19-86 PCUL 14.7 1.1 15.0 9.5 20 M-3/H20 6-13-% 7- 7-M KUL 3251.7 310.3 3125.0 to00,o 11 ALPm/f!L 4-25-% 6- 1-M KI/IIL 18.3 0.6 15.0 8.7 22 BETA!!!L t-2Fh 6- 1-86 PC1/fIL 39.0 2.0 47.0 18.5 13 Cf-137/f!L 4-25-% 6- 1-% KUTIL 11.7 1.5 10.0 6.4 24 Cl-51/H2O 10-1F86 10-2*-66 KI/L 50.3 6.8 59.0 10.f-M CO-60/H2O 10-10-% 10-29-N KI/L 29.7 0.6 31.0 8.0 26 2N-63/H2O 1(-lC-E 10-29-% KUL 83.0 1.0 85.0 7.'
" RU-l%/H2O 10-10-86 10-28-66 PC1/L 72.7 6.7 74.0 7.9 28 C5-134/H2O 10-10-86 10-2*-% KUL 24.3 0.6 28.0 7.8 3 C5-137/H2O 10-10-N 10-29-M KUL 43.0 1.7 44.0 10.9 30 1-131/H2O 8- 8-N 9- 3-M PCUL 40.7 8.5 45.0 18. f.
67
TABLEV-1(Cont'd) UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - EPA CROSS-CHECK - RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE SES TYPE COLLECIl0N RESULTS UNITS NEAN Of SID EPA VALUE 3-516MA liAIN ACT 4 ANALYSIS DATE k!TURNE8 3 ANAL. DEY LIMIT
-l l i i l I I l i l-31 N-3/ LOC 10-17-% 10-31-M KI/L 5488.3 341.5 5973.0 1000.0 32 BETA /FIL 9-12-E 10-27-E KI/FIL 68.0 1.0 E.0 10.9 33 CS-137/EIL S-12-E 10-27-M KI/FIL 20.0 7.0 22.0 11.0 PRINCIPAL NVESTIGATOP PROJECT MANA6F6
-.Y 4
TABLE V-2 FLORIDA DEPT. OF HRS - EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1986 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 04 25 86 15 pCi/F 0 16 0.34 FILTER Beta 04 25 86 47 pCi/F 0.474 46 -0.34 FILTER Cs-137 04 25 86 10 pCi/F 0.118 12.66 0.92 FILTER Sr-90 04 25 86 18 pCi/F 0.395 15.33 -3.08 ( 2.' FOOD I-131 01 31 86 20 pCi/Kg 0.197 20.66 0.19 FOOD Cs-137 01 31 86 15 pCi/Kg 0.118 14.33- -0.23 FOOD K 01 31 86 950 pCi/Kg 0.248 1013.33 0.77 i FOOD Sr-89 01 31 86 25 pCi/Kg 0.237 11 -4.85 (3) FOOD Sr-90 01 31 86 10 pCi/Kg 0.395 11.66 1.92 MILE I-131 10 25 85 42 pCi/L 0.197 49.66 2.21 MILK I-131 06 27 86 pCi/L NA
- MILK Cs-137 10 25 85 56 pCi/L 0.355 58.67 0.92 MILK Cs-137 06 27 86 pCi/L NA (
MILK K '10 25 85 1540 pCi/L 0.23 1596.66 1.27 [ MILK K 06 27 86 pCi/L NA
. MILK Sr-89 10 25 85 48 pCi/L 0.237 46.66 -0.46 MILK Sr-89 06 27 86 pCi/L NA MILK Sr-90 10 25 85 26 pCi/L 0 24 -2.31 MILK Sr-90 06 27 86 pCi/L NA WATER Alpha 11 22 85 10 pCi/L 0.118 11.66 0.58 WATER Alpha 01 24 86 3 pCi/L 0.118 3.66 0.23 WATER Alpha 03 21 86 15 pCi/L 0.118 12.33 -0.92 WATER Alpha 05 23 86 8 pCi/L 0.118 6.67 -0.46 WATER Beta 11 22 85 13 pCi/L 0 16 1.03 WATER Beta 01 24 86 7 pCi/L 0.118 7.67 0.23 WATER Beta 03 21 86 8 pCi/L 0.118 9.33 0.46 WATER Beta 05 23 86 15 pCi/L 0.118 16.66 0.58 WATER Cr-51 02 07 86 3R pCi/L 0.576 44 2.07 WATER Cr-51 06 06 86 0 pCi/L 0 0 0 WATER Co-60 02 07 86 18 pCi/L 0.118 19.66 0.58 WATER Co-60 06 06 86 66 pCi/L 0.118 66.67 0.23 WATER Zn-65 02 07 86 40 pCi/L 0.237 43 1.03 WATER Zn-65 06 06 86 86 pCi/L 0.592 90.67 1.61 WATER Ru-106 02 07 86 0 pCi/L 0 0 0 WATER Ru-106 06 06 86 50 pCi/L 0.711 50.33 0.11 WATER Cs-134 02 07 86 30 pCi/L 0.118 28.66 -0.46 WATER Cs-134 06 06 86 49 pCi/L 0.237 47 -0.69 WATER Cs-137 02 07 86 22 pCi/L 0.237 22 0 WATER Cs-137 06 06 86 10 pCi/L 0 11 0.34 WATER H-3 02 14 86 5227 pCi/L 0.091 5183.33 -0.14 WATER H-3 06 13 86 3125 pCi/L 0.362 3143.33 0.09 WATER I-131 12 06 85 45 pCi/L 0.197 50 1.44 WATER Sr-89 01 10 86 31 pCi/L 0.355 29.66 -0.46 WATER Sr-89 05 09 86 5 pCi/L 0.237 5 0 WATER Sr-90 01 10 86 15 pCi/L 0 15 0 WATER Sr-90 05 09 86 5 pCi/L 0.395 4.66 -0.38 69
r-P TABLE V-2 (Cont'd) FI4RIDA DEPT. OF BRS - EPA INT m _^=aRATORY N Nim-N w T PROGRAM DATA June through December, 1986 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 09 12 86 22 pCi/F 0.829 17.33 -1.61 FILTER Beta 09 12 86 66 pCi/F 0.237 64.67 -0.46 FILTER Cs-137 09 12 86 22 pCi/F 0.237 25.00 1.03 ! FILTER Sr-90 09 12 86 22 pCi/F 0.395 21.33 -0.77 ) FOOD I-131 07 25 86 30 pCi/Kg 0.197 29.00 -0.29 FOOD Cs-137 07 25 86 20 pCi/Kg 0.118 21.66 0.58 FOOD K 07 25 86 1150 mg/Kg 0.817 1173.33 0.70 FOOD Sr-89 07 25 86 30 pCi/Kg NDP FOOD Sr-90 07 25 86 19 pCi/Kg NDP
- MILK I-131 06 27 86 41 pCi/L 0.197 44.00 0.87 MILK I-131 10 31 86 pCi/L NA i MILK Cs-137 u6 27 86 31 pCi/L O'000
. 4.00 -9.35 (1) l MILK Cs-137 10 31 86 pCi/L NA MILK K 06 27 86 1000 mg/L 0.296 1616.66 0.36 MILK K 10 31 86 mg/L NA
! MILK Sr-89 06 27 86 0 pCi/L 0.237 0.67 0.23 MILK Sr-09 10 31 86 pCi/L NA i MILK Sr-90 06 27 86 16 pCi/L 0.395 12.33 -4.23 (2) MILK Sr-90 10 31 86 pCi/L NA 4 WATER Alpha 07 18 86 6 pCi/L 0.118 5.67 -0.11 WATER Alpha 09 19 86 15 pCi/L 0.000 16.00 0.34 WATER Alpha 11 21 86 20 pCi/L 0.237 13.66 -2.19 (3) , WATER Beta 07 18 86 18 pCi/L 0.000 18.00 0.00
' WATER Beta 09 19 86 8 pCi/L 0.000 10.00 0.69 1 WATER Beta 11 21 86 20 pCi/L 0.000 22.00 0.69 i
WATER Cr-51 06 06 86 0 pci/L 0.000 0.00 0.00 WATER Cr-51 10 10 86 59 pCi/L 0.592 55.33 -1.27 i WATER Co-60 06 06 86 66 pCi/L 0.118 66.67 0.23 WATER Co-60 10 10 86 31 pCi/L 0.118 31.66 0.23 i WATER Zn-65 06 06 86 86 pCi/L 0.592 90.67 1.61 WATER Zn-65 10 10 86 85 pci/L 0.576 89.33 1.50 j WATER Ru-106 06 06 86 50 pCi/L 0.711 50.33 0.11 i WATER Ru-106 10 10 86 74 pCi/L 1.927 72.00 -0.69 WATER Cs-134 06 06 86 49 pCi/L 0.237 47.00 -0.69 WATER Cs-134 10 10 86 28 pci/L 0.237 26.00 -0.69 WATER Cs-137 06 06 86 10 pci/L 0.000 11.00 0.34 WATER Cs-137 10 10 86 44 pCi/L 0.237 44.66 0.23 WATER H-3 , 06 13 86 3125 pC1/L 0.362 3143.33 0.09 WATER H-3 10 17 86 5973 pCi/L NDP WATER I-131 08 08 86 45 pCi/L 0.197 41.33 -1.05 f 4 , 70
F TABLE V-2 (Cont'd) FLORIDA DEPT. OF HRS - EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PRCGRAM MTA NOTES: Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in " Environmental Radioactivity Lab-Range oratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 - 1982", l Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. O. Box 15027, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89114. EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981. N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value. As defined in EPA-600/4-81-004. NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report. NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been re-ceived from EPA, Las Vegas. (1) causes Decimal point in wrong position. Corrective action: Use more care in recording data. (2) Causes Poor chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective ac-tion: Try to improve chemical recovery. (3) Cause: Unknown. Corrective action: None at this time. I 1 71
l l I
'l g;
- I f ,
f h ?O ~ }
't, ,,,
Power CORPORATION April 30,1987 3F0487-22 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Crystal River Unit No. 3 Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
Dear Sir:
Florida Power Corporation (FPC) hereby submits the 1986 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in compliance with Crystal River Unit 3 Technical Specification, Appendix A, Section 6.9.1.5(c). The report , contains the data obtained from the radiological environmental surveillance program conducted for the Crystal River site for 1986. Should you have any q"estions concerning this submittal, please contact this office. l W f%7 E. C. Simpson, Acting Director Nuclear Site Support GMF/amb Attachment xc: Dr. J. Nelson Grace (1) Regional Administrator, Region II i Mr. T.F. Stetka (1) Senior Resident Inspector GENERAL OFFICE: 3201 Thirty fourth Street South e P.O. Box 14042 . St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 . (813) 866 5151 A Florida Progress Company}}