3F0596-09, 1995 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept
| ML20117F799 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1995 |
| From: | Boldt G, Ezzell P FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 3F0596-09, 3F596-9, NUDOCS 9605200219 | |
| Download: ML20117F799 (57) | |
Text
e 4
h Florida Power CORPORATION xist No.
3 May 14, 1996 3F0596-09 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.
20555
Subject:
1995 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
Dear Sir:
Florida Power Corporation hereby submits the 1995 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in compliance with Crystal River Unit 3 Technical Specifications, Section 5.7.1.lb. The report contains the data obtained from the radiological environmental surveillance program conducted for the Crystal River site for 1995.
Sincerely, i
1 G. L. B ldt Vice President Nuclear Production Attachment GLB/ff xc: NRR Project Manager Regional Administrator, Region II Senior Resident Inspector 200070 9605200219 951231 i
n PDR ADOCK 05000302
/
p PDR t
i CRYSTAL RIVER ENERGY COMPEX 15760 W. Power une Street. Crystal River. Flonda 344284708. (352) 7954406 A Fkvida Progress Company
e-l i
j i
l l
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1995 i
e Prepared By A
'R.M Chamrad Specialist II Approved By
. /
A MendeerpTeeFChemistry S
?$
Date
e TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
Sunnery Description of Radiological Environmentet Monitoring Program...................
1 II.
Land Use Census 10 III.
EPA Intertaboratory Comparison Program......... 11 IV.
Analytical Results................... 13 A.
Airborne Pathway.................. 13 Statistical Summary................. 14 5.
D i rect R adi a t i on.................. 23 Statistical Sunnary................. 24 C.
Waterborne Pathway................. 27 1.
Seawater.................... 27 Statistical Summary 28 2.
Groundwater................... 27 Statistical Sunnary............... 32
'3.
Drinkire Water................. 27 Statistical Sunnary............... 35 4.
Shoreline sediment............... 27 Statistical Summary............... 38 j
D.
Ingestion Pathway 41 1.
Carnivorous Fish................ 41 Statistical Summary...
........... 42 2.
Dysters 41 Stati st ical Sumnary............... 45 3.
Broad Leaf Vegetation 41 Statistical Summary.
48 4.
Watermelon and Citrus 41 Statistical Summary............... 52 i
l 4
l i
I
.~.-
J d
I l
i g
i e
l INTRODUCTION i'
This report is stinuitted as required by Technical Specification 5.7.1.ib to Crystat River Facility Operating License No. DPR 72, and Section 6.6 of the Of fsite Dose Calculation Manual. The following information is included in this report:
1 Data Sunsaaries.
Interpretations.
Unachievable LLDs.
l An analysis of trends.
l An assessment of any observed ispect of plant operation on the environment.
j NOTE:
If harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage are detected by the monitoring, the Report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to correct it.
- Summarized and tabulated results of att radiological environmental sanples taken during the report period, in the format of Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, j
Novenber, 1979.
j NOTE:
If some results are not available for inclusion, the report shall note and explain the reason for the missing results. The missinc results shall be submitted as soon as 4
l possible in a supplementary report.
A stamanry description of the REMP.
A map of all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the reactor.
- The results of land-use censuses.
- Results of Interleboratory Comparison Program.
1 l
f
)
4 3
l 11
i i
1 4
a 1.
SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION OF RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM The analytical results of the crystal River Unit 3 (CR 3) operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for 1995 are contained in this report. The operational program began on January 1, 1977 l
just prior to inittel criticality, which was achicved on January 14, 1977.
1 Sampling of the facility environs is performed by the State of Florida Department of Health and j
Rehabilitative Services (FDHRS), Office of Radiation Control. The State also performs the required analyses, participates in the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Interleboratory Comparison Program, and performs the annual land-use census.
Sanple station locations are given in Table I t and Figures I 2, -3, and -4.
Sample frequency and analysis i
type may be determined from Table I-2. Figure I-1 filustrates the relevant exposure pathways.
1 Except for air sample gross beta results and direct radiation measurements, most of the analytical results are below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of the sanple. Sample LLDs are generally much lower than the required "a priori" LLD. When measurable results are reported, the values are also usually less than the required "a priori" LLD.
The results of the 1995 REKP have been conpared to previous years' results. This comparison, in part Illustrated by the trend graphs' of Section IV, shows no evidence of long-term radionuclide buildup in any of the sample media. Additionally, these results verify the effectiveness of in plant measures for controlling radioactive releases.
I
' Trend graphs illustrate the mean measured concentration of a particular radionuclide for the year. When measurable results are not obtained, the highest sample LLD is plotted.
TABLE l-1
!e FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 SAMPLE STATION LOCATIONS SAMPLE MEDIA STATION ID DIRECTION DISTANCE TLD C60 N
4400 FT.
C61 NME 4400 C62 NE 5300 l
C63 ENE 4400 C64 E
4400 g
C65 ESE 1740 i
C66 SE 1600 C67 SSE 1480 C68 S
1500 C69 SSW 1780 C41 SW 2100 i
C70 WSW 4400 C71 WWW 3600 C72 NW 2400 C73 NNW 2000 C27 W
3400 C18 N
5.2 Mt.
C03 NNE 5.3 i
C04 NE 6.3 C74 ENE 5.5 C75 E
4.2 C76 ESE 5.4 C08 SE 3.5 C77 SSE 3.2 C09 3.2 C78 WSW 4.1 C14G W
2.8 C01 NW 4.9 C79 NNW 5.0 C47-Control ESE 80 2
I*
TABLE I 1 (CONT'D) j FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 SAMPLE STATION LOCATIONS l
j i
l SAMPLE MEDIA STATION ID DIRECTION DISTANCE l
AIR C07 ESE 7.5 Mt.
C18 N
5.2 C40 E
3.5 C41 SW 0.4 C46 N
0.4 l
C47-Control ESE 80 l
i WATER SEAWATER C14H NW 0.1 l
C14G
-W 2.8 C13-Control WSW 3.4 i
GROUND WATER C40-Control E
3.5 l
(
DRINKING WATER C07-Control ESE 7.5 l
C10-control ESE 5.9 C18-Control N
5.2 j
l SHORELINE SEDIMENT C09-Control S
3.2 C14N NW 0.1 l
C14M W
1.2 l
C14G W
2.8 l
I j
FISH & OYSTERS C29 E
2.0 i
C30 Control WSW 3.6 l
VEGETATION C48A N
0.8 C488 NNE 0.8
(
C47-Control ESE 80 l
WATERMELON C04 ENE 6.3 CITRUS C19 ENE 8.5 1
3 l
.._._.__.__..-.m l
TABLE l 2 FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM SAMPLE MEDIA
Weekly 1-131 0.07 pcl/m Air Particulate 6
Weekly Gross 8 0.01 Quarterly 1 Spec :
Cs-134 0.05 Cs 137 0.06 Seawater 3
Monthly Trittun 3000 pCf/L Monthly 1 Spec Mn-54 15 Fe-59 30 Co-58 15 l
Co-60 15 Zn-65 30 Zr-Nb-95 15 I-131 1
Cs 134 15 Cs 137 18 Be La-140 15 Ground Water 1
Semiannual Tritlun 2000 pcl/L Semiannual 1 Spec :
3 2
Drinking Water 3.
Quarterly Tritium Quarterly 1 Spec :
3 3
Shoreline Sediment 4
Semlannual 1 Spec :
Cs-134 150 pCl/kg Cs 137 180 l
i 1-l 4
l
TABLE l 2 (Cont'd) e FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM i
SAMPLE MEDIA
- OF STATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS LLD' l
l Carnivorous Fish 2
cuarterly 1 Spec :
and Oysters Mn-54 130 pCf/kg Fe-59 260 Co-58 130 l
co-60 130 Zn-65 260 Cs 134 130 Cs-137 150 8
l Broad Leaf 3
Monthly 1 Spec :
Vegetation I 131 60 pCf/kg Cs 134 60 Cs 137 80 Citrus 1
Annual *
--1 Spec :
s s
l Watermelon 1
Annual '
1 Spec :
s a
l l
l
'The maxinun "a priori" LLD i
'Same as Seawater 1 spec l
'When available
'During harvest "Same as broad leaf vegetation j
5 l
e Airborne Releases LimJid Releases I
r Air External Radiation seawater f
l
- Ground Water Sediments -
- Drinking Water -
Aquatic Animals -
I l
- Food crops -
i I
i i-Man i
l FIGURE I-1: Environmental Media and Exposure Pathways i
1 j
l l
t i
J I
i l
l i '
o l
i I~
I 4
l l.
i I
4 l-1 i
6
~... -.
f o l
f sN~ -
=
N 8KRJ89EAIJ WI N Rgygg c0 i
C04 i
s j
C19 atoes mueron annes canno f
(J. S. le C48a C486
"' """*enTr um C29 C14N
\\
C14G-C14H C41 pu ur a:Tu C30 CIO h
h GtVWTAL aIvan KING'S bay FIWRE I 2: Environmental Monitoring Sanple Station Locations 7
4 l
l C60 C61 l
(
I C62
~
.~' N g.
[j" LJ
'l 1f-i? (
O ma
')
k q.
coat vAm C63
[
I C71 I
1 f
4 C72 l
ACCESS _ ROAD cm_.
-4, C64 j
~ W C
I PRIMARY O o.
.11,
f met -
f C65 J
i y
C66 2: Li C70
\\
/ WA C4 H
C69 ancap 400' EEDRotmICAL Towem FIGURE l-3: Environmental Monitoring TLD Locations (site Boundary) 8
. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _ _.. _.. _ _.... _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _.. _..... ~..
l' i
4 4
i i
1 l
4 I
C1L _
C03 j
m w-C79 l
Y i
l C04 C01 j
6 PLDRIDA mangg capeg, l
i 4
U.S. IS i
j l
N 8'RDPsitTY LIlsE
\\
i C146 -
j C78 Puser sr7s l
C76 e
li CRYSTAL RIvest CO C77 C08 KIW's any FIGURE I 4: Environmental Monitoring TLD Locations (5 Miles) 9
If.
tAND-USE CENSUS A land-use census to identify the nearest residences, vegetable gardens, and potential milk producing animals within a five mile radius of the nuclear plant was conducted in May. The distance in miles and bearing in degrees for each receptor type in each of the sixteen sectors is sunnerized below.
I NEAREST NEAREST NEAREST SECTOR RESIDENCE GARDEN MILK ANIMAL N
4.4 a 2' 4.735' NNE 3.8 a 15' 4.5 a 13*
NE 3.8355' 4.1 3 47' ENE 3.4 a 60*
4.4 a 57*
E 3.5 a 97*
4.1 a 93' ESE 4.2 a 101*
4.2 a 101' SE 4.7 a 133' SSE 3.4 a 150' S
WNW NW 4.69319' NNW 4.5 a 338' 4.5 a 339' None ALL sectors around the plant which are not exclusively water or marshtend might occasionally have milk producing animals at the plant boundary. Most of the land adjacent to the plant site is woodland; however, much of the land in the immediate area is pastureland for cattle and a few horses. Stray cattle are often seen in the wooded areas adjacent to the plant site. These cattle are raised for beef or veal. At times there may be fresh females in these herds, but these animals roam freely and are not mitkod. A few goats have also been located at residences within the survey area. None of these cows or goats are known to be providing milk for human use, and the owners are not willing to make samples of milk available.
i 10 t
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HRS - EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA e
Medle Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal Mean of N.D.K.
Action Known Range Analysis Level WATER Alpha 01 27 95 5
pcl/L 0.236 5.00 0.00 WATER Beta 01 27 - 95 5
pct /L 0.236 7.33 0.81 WTER Co-60 06 09 95 40 pcl/L 0.236 39.00 0.35 WATER Zn-65 06 09 95 76 pC1/L 0.517 82.67 1.44 WATER Be 133 06 09 95 79 pC1/L 0.148 74.33
-1.01 WATER Cs 134 06 09 95 50 pct /L 0.000 47.00
-1.04 WATER Cs-137 06 09 95 35 pcl/L 0.354 37.67 0.92 WATER N3 03 10 95 7435 pCI/L 0.193 7355.00 0.19 WATER l-131 02 03 95 100 pC1/L 0.118 97.00
-0.52 WATER Sr 89 01 13 95 20 pCl/L 0.354 14.33
-1.96 WATER Sr-90 01 13 95 15 pcl/L 0.236 10.33
-1.62 FILTER Alphe 08 25 95 25 pCI/F 0.141 28.30 0.91 FILTER Bete 08 25 95 86.6 pC1/F 0.396 79.57
-1.22 FILTER Cs-137 08 25 95 25 pcl/F 0.000 28.00 1.04 FILTER Sr-90 08 25 95 30 pCl/F 0.709 21.33 3.00 1
MILK I 131 09 29 95 99 pcl/L 0.295 98.67 0.06 MILK Cs 137 09 29 95 ' 50 pCl/L 0.000 53.00 1.04 f
MILE K
09 29 95 1654 mg/L 0.306 1687.33 0.70 MILK Sr-89 09-29 95 20 pCi/L 0.945 12.00
-2.77 MILK Sr-90 09 29 95 15 pcl/L 0.945 16.00 0.35 WTER Alpha 07_
21 95 27.5 pCl/L 0.231 23.33
-1.05 WATER Alpha 10 27 95 51.2 pcl/L 0.120 24.90 3.56 2
i WATER Bete 07 21 95 19.4 pcl/L 0.567 23.60 1.45 WATER Beta 10 27 95 24.8 pCl/L 1.413 32.97 2.83 WATER Co-60 11 03 95 60 pCl/L 0.236 60.33 0.12 WATER Zn-65 11 03 95 125 pCl/L 0.409 134.67 1.29 1
WATER 8a 133 11 03 95 99 pCf/L 0.059 92.67 1.10 WATER Cs 134 11 03 95 40 pCf/L 0.118 37.33 0.92
]
WATER Cs 137 11 03 95 49 pCl/L 0.354 54.00 1.73 WATER N3 08 04 95 4872 pct /L NDP WATER I-131 10 06 95 148 pcl/L 0.039 148.67 0.08 WATER Sr 89 07 14 95 20 pCl/L 0.591 8.00
-4.16 3
WATER Sr-90 07 14 95 8
pCl/L 0.118 9.33 0.46 11
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HRS - EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA e
l l
(Cont'd)
NOTES:
l NORMAL: Normalized Range. As defined in " Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program l
Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection l
Agency, P. O. Box 93478, Les Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478. EPA 600/4 81-004, February, 1981.
)
N.D.K.
Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA 600/4 81 004.
NDP No data provided. No dets was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.
I NA:
Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.
j i
ACT!0W LEVEL:
(1)
Cause: Chemical recoveries too low and inconsistent.
Corrective Action: Try to improve recovery and consistency.
(2)
Cause: Please see attached note from EPA.
Corrective Action: Try EPA's suggestions.
(3)
Cause: Insufficient number of counts on sample.
Corrective Action: Count sanpies more time.
1 I
12
1 4
j IV-A.
AIRBORNE PATHWAY 1
Air sanples are taken at five locations in the vicinity of the plant. The control location is 80 miles ESE of the plant, at the State Office of Radiation Control in Orlando.
Table IV A.1 provides a statistical sunnery of the analytical results for 307 gross beta sanples and 307 i
lodine samples.
of 307 particulate samples analyzed for gross beta activity, 306 had measurable activity. The average indicator concentration was 18 pCl/1,000 m' with a range of 3 to 31 pCI/1,000 m'.
The average indicator concentration for each year from 1989 through 1994 was 19 pCf/1,000 m'. An increase in 1993 to 31 pC1/1,000 m'is attributed to a shortening of the time between collection and counting, resulting in a greater fraction of the activity being due to short-lived naturally occurring daughter products.
Three hundred and seven samples were analyzed for Iodine activity, with none having measurable activity.
Tables IV-A.2 and IV-A.3 provide the results for each weekly air sanple.
Quarterly composite data are summarized in Table IV-A.4.
Measurable quantitles of ceslue were not identified. The highest Cesium LLD was 1.1 pCf/1,000 m'.
The gross beta LLD of 0.01 pCI/m' was not attained for the following air samples as sample duration was shortened due to power outages:
Station C40 on 3 20-95 Station C40 on 8-28-95 i
Power outages during the entire weekly sample period prevented the following samples from being obtained:
Station C40 on 9-05-95 Station C46 on 5 22-95 Station C46 on 5 30 95 13
e TABLE IV-A.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITN NIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATNWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
AIRBORNE y Spec 307 IODINE (pCl/m')
I-131 0.024
<LLD
<LLD 0
AIRBORNE Gross 8 307 2.5 18 (256/256)
C40 15 (51/51) 15 (52/52)
O PARTICULATES (3 - 31) 3.5 a 90*
(5 - 27)
(4 - 27)
(pcl/1000m' for y Spec 24 Gross 8, FC!!~005d h,r Cii34 6,9
<LLD
<LLD 0
_.+
Y Spec)
Cs-137 6.6
<LLD
<LLD 0
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 00CM.
e 4
e 1
l 1
Pm e=
- =
e=
e-N N M N N w=
w=
e=
o=
N M e=
N W
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O u
e o
e e
e e
e e
e a
e e
e e
e e
e V V V V V V
V V V
V V V V V V V V e=
==
e=
= N N M N N e-N *
o=
N M e=
N W
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y
e e
e e
e e
e e
e a
e a
e e
e e
e V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V
V e=
e=
- =
e-
- = N N M N N
= N *
e=
N M N N W
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O.
O.
O u
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e=
M V V V V V V V V V
V V V V V V V V me e
4 M
E E
==
u e=
a M
O
- = *= *= *= N
.N M N N
- === N N N M N N w=
W D C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e
y e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
N 4,
e V V V V V V V V V V V V
V V V V V
4 5 W
e U
E 3e e=
~ "
8 W
==
=a O
1 m
e, q
e e=
e=
- =
e=
N N M N'N
- =
e=
w w N M e=
N 1
m
- =
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
- 4. gC W
e e
e e
e e
e a
e=
e ae=
W W V V V V
V V V V V V V V V V V E
-o.
te N
- === w e=
N N M N N e=
N *=
e=
N M N N O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O u
e a
e e
e e
o e
e o
e e
e e
o e
e V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V
V W
e=
4e 5
e t=uW M @ >= M *=
P=
M *= N
@ M C e W O e W
=J O O *= N M C== N N O== N N O== *= N
.a e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
a e
e e
O
= *
e=
- =
e=
N N N N M M M M W W W W U
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 15
e o
e e
N N *= N e=
N e=
N N N N N *= N N e *= N e=
W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O u
o e
o e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
o e
V V V V V V V V V V V V
V V
V V V V N
e=
N
- N N N N N e=
N N
- =
e=
N==
O O O e a
O O O O O O O O O O O O O y
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
V V V V
V V V V V
'V V
V V V V
V e=
N e=
N e=
e=
e=
N N N
- e=
N e=
N N e=
e=
N e=
et O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
e e
e= ' E V V V V V V V V V V V V V
V V V V V em e-e aEl T=
M E
W E
em W
W
's M
O N e N e e e N N N N N e N N e e N N w
e se O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e
u o
e e
e e
o e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e N
a V V V V V V V V V V
V V V V V V V V 4 5
=
e u
E "g -8 ofa
& M e
N e=
N e=
w e=
N N N N N== N N e=
N *=
4 S
- =
O O O.
O.
O O
O.
O.
O.
O O O O O O O O O p
4 u
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e O
==
V V V V V V
V V V V V V V V
V V V V E
am k
N e en e=
e e=
N N N N N e N N e-N e=
0 C O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O u
e e
e e
e e
a e
e o
e e
e o
e e
e V V V V V V V V V V V V V-V V V V V W
e-4O E
_e-U-
e e m N O m N D @
M C N W e-N 4 e=
W
.4 O O== N M O
e=
e=
N O *=
e=
N M C e N N
.J e
e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e O
m m m m m N N N N N ee e e U
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 16 1
e a
e e
N N== *=
e=
N *= N N M N N M N N
e.
N==
W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U
e o
e e
o e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e o
e V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V N *=
w=
- =
N *= N N M N N M N N
e=
N e-at O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W
e e
e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y V V e=
N *= e *=
N *= N N M N N M N N
e=
N c=
W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U
e e
e e
a e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e g
V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V
a.e a
e
(
13 M
a
=,*
e g
on C
W D
e=
U e
M O
e=
e==
N e=
N N M N N M N N e N e=
ese
==
W s O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e
y e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
N a
V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V
< 8 W
e o a ea 8
W
- e
.Je M
80 N e e e=
N e N N M N N M N N e N==
4 E
e=
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
>=
et u
e e
e e
e a
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e O
==
V V V V V V V
V V V V V V V
V V V 5
=>
ta.
a
'N N
e=
a=
w=
N e=
N N M N N M N N
e=
N e=
n O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
a e
e V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V W
>=
4O E
h=
UW in e-W an N > @ M O
@ M O N W== so @
J O **
e=
N O O ** N M O
e-N N O
e=
e-N
=.J e
a e
e e
a e
e e
o e
a e
e o
e
.e O
e>>>
c O O O O e-
- e=
e=
N N N N U
O O O O e-
- =
e=
- =
e=
e-
- == *=
e=
- ===
e=
a i
1 I
d I
17 i
i l
i
TABLE IV-A.3 FLOA!DA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pcl/1000m' GROSS B IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 01-03 to 13 15 11 15 8
01-09 7
18 23 21 15 17 01-17 6
20 12 15 16 17 01-23 12 16 14 11 13 11 01-31 22 16 18 19 14 25 02-07 18 26 27 13 25 27 02-13 9
14 15 15 16 13 02-20 9
12 10 8
to 12 02-27 13 16 17 14 6
10 03-06 14 13 15 9
8 16 03-13 20 19 19 19 18 18 03-20 5
9 9
10 6
11 03-28 18 16 23 17 16 19 04-04 12 22 20 18 12 18 04-10 to 10 6
9 13 10 04-18 16 16 19 13 15 20 04-24 17 21 17 17 22 20
- - ~ _ _ _ _.... _... _.... _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ - -. - - - - -. --_
s TA8LE IV-A.3 (conted)
-FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 PCf/1000m' GROSS S IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41-C46 C47 '
05-01 14 17 13 17 14 13 05-08 17 18 -
20 18 20 17-05-15 14 17 12 9
14 14
~
05-22 11 13 19 15' 19 05-30 15 14 12 14 12 06-05 5
10 8
9 11 10 06-12 6
19 15 13 16 18 06-19 9
13 12 13 13 12 06-26 8
10 11 5
7 6
07-03 12 18 17 16 9
13 07-10 18 25 20 22 18 25 07-17 11 12 11 13 12 11 07-24 11 14 12 12 15 7
07-31 11 9
8 8
3 7
08-07 16 16 16 17 16 13 08-14 17 17 13 '
11 16 11 08-21 28 23 26 21.
28 22 08-28 8
6 9
10 8
13
m.
.. ~.. _
_.m_
TABLE IV-A.3 (Cont'd)
FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCl/1000m' GROSS B IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 09-05 13 19 12 8
11 09-11 7
9 9
10 8
11 09-18 6
9 5
6 10 7-09-25 12 13 15 13 14 18 10-02 8
12 8
9 7
8 10-09
<5 6
5 6
7 4
10-16 5
7 8
4 3
5 10-23 17 18 15 16 18 13 10-30 15 13 15 15 16 20 11-06 20 14 16 19 17 22 11-13 15 15 14 19 21 18 11-20 12 22 22 23 23 19 11-27 24 28 25 21 27 22 12-04 21 17 13 20 26 20 12-11 21 31 21 23 27 19 12-18 20 19 21 16 18 14 12-26 16 13 17 17 14 11 L
2.---
e TABLE IV-A.4 FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCl/1000a8 7 EMITTERS IN 00ARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES STATION NUCLIDE FIRST GUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIR0 00ARTER FOURTM'00ARTER C07 se-7 117 109 105 127 K-40
<18 18
<15
<19 Cs-134
<0.9
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8 Cs-137
<0.9
<0.8
<1.0
<0.9 C18 se-7 152 115 105 122 K-40
<16
<20
<18
<18 Cs-134
<0.9
<0.8
<0.5
<0.7 Cs-137
<0.9
<1.1
<0.7
<0.9 C40 Be-7 129 137 89 108 K-40
<21
<22
<20
<21 Cs-134
<0.9
<0.7
<1.1
<0.8 Cs-137
<0.8
<0.5
<1.0
<0.8 C41 se-7 128 135 106 139 K-40
<16
<17
<17
<18 Cs-134
<1.0
<0.7
<0.6
<1.0 CS-137
<0.8
<0.7
<0.8
<0.7 C46 se-7 118 122 81 133 K-40
<18
<19
<20
<19 Cs-134
<0.6
<1.0
<1.1
<0.8 Cs-137
<0.7
<0.8
<0.7
<0.8 C47 se-7 139 134 92 131 K-40
<19 18
<16 20 Cs-134
<0.8
<1.2
<0.9
<0.7 Cs-137
<0.9
<0.6
<0.8
<0.6
i l
Air Samples 1
b 0.1 y1 s,
^
/'
/
\\
A x
i
\\
f
\\
N
/
\\
N
/
\\
/
\\
/\\
/
\\
N
/
\\
/
\\ /
\\
/
N N
\\
/
V
\\/
0.01 a
N l \\
i A
._ / \\
/
\\
/ \\
f
\\
l
\\
l \\
\\
/
V\\
l\\
- ~ ~.
\\
l
\\
. = -.,
\\
I
\\
\\
..%..J
\\s
\\3" V
0.0001 i
i i
i i
i.
i i
i i
i i
i i
77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Year Z l131 C Cs 137 l 131 LLD
-E-Cs-137 LLD i
i 4
b 1
i:
s 22 l
-,w..
r
<-.y
-y
.t--y v,-,.. - -.. -
e o,
e a
IV-8.
DIRECT RADIAff0N Direct radiation measurements (using TLDs) were taken at sixteen locations within one mile of the plant, at thirteen locations ranging from 2.8 to 6.3 miles from the plant, and at one control location 80 miles from the site. The highest on-site dose was 107 mrom/yr at station C71 (NW at 2400 feet). The increase at C71 of approximately 30 mres/yr since 1992 is attributed to the TLD being moved (due to construction). The new location is closer to a storage pond for Units 4 & $
fly ash. The highest off site dose was 55 mrem /yr at station C14C (west at 2.8 miles). The control station (C47) dose was 44 mres/yr. The average for att stations was 49 mrem /yr. With the exception of C71, direct radiation results are similar to previous years and show no change of significance.
23
TABLE IV-8 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEM8ER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUM8ER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITN NIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
DIRECT 7 DOSE 127 15 49 (123/123)
C71 107 (4/4) 44 (4/4) 0 RADIATION (37 - 112) 0.5 a 280*
(105 - 112)
(43 - 44)
(ares /yr)
W i
i
e TABLE IV-B.1 FLOR.'OA POWER CORP. - CR 1995 mrem /yr 7 Dose TLD STATION Quarter 1
2 3
4 Col 44 40 43 42 C03 45 45 45 44 C04 44 40 43 43 C07 41 40 41 42 C08 41 41 40 40 41 40 40 C09
-C14G 54 56 54 55 C18 45 43 48 44 C27 65 60 64 61 C40 54 55 56 53 C41 61 56 55 57 C46 52 52 53 52 C47 (CONTROL) 44 44 44 43 C60 50 51 54 51 C61 55 54 55 53 C62 59 60 63 60 C63 57 56 54 56 C64 53 54 53 53 C65 53 52 52 50 C66 56 53 54 53 C67 63 59 59 59 C68 57 58 56 55 C69 60 60 58 59 C70 62 59 60 60 C71 107 106 112 105 C72 57 55 59 57 C73 51 51 51 52 39 41 41 C74 CTS 52 50 49 50 C76 44 46 43 46 C77 40 39 39 37 C78 46 46 45 45 C79 46 43 49 49 l
1 l
l l
l l
25
4 l
External Radiation 100 A
A
/ \\
m
/
A i
V
\\
E i
e 1
80 81 82 83 64 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Year 26
e IV-C.
WATERBORNE PA1HWAY To evaluate the waterborne pathway, seawater, groundwater, drinking water, and shoreline sediment samples are taken.
1.
Monthly seawater grab samples are taken at two tocations in the discharge canal and at one control location near the mouth of the intake canat. Of twenty-four indicator samples, ten had a measurable amount of Tritium at an average level of 167 pCl/L. Five samples taken at the control location, C13, indicated measurable amounts of Tritium at an average level of 165 pCI/L.
Gamme spectral analysis was performed on thirty six samples, none of which showed measurable amounts of the gamma emitters of interest.
i 2.
Semiannual groundwater samples are taken at one location, station C40. Gamma spectrat and i
Tritium analyses are performed on both samples. All results were less than the LLD. Since plant startup, all results, except for the results of one 1985 Tritium analysis, have been less a
than LLD. The required sensitivity for measuring tritium in groundwater is 2000 pCl/L.
Analysis of groundwater in the vacinity of CR-3 is done at a sensitivity of approximately 200 pct /L for tritium and 10 pCl/L for select gamma emitters.
3.
Quarterly drinking water samples are drawn from three locations: the Crystal River Public Water Plant (C07), the Indian Waters Public Water Supply (C10), and the Yankeetown City Well I
(C18). All samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitters and Tritium. None of the samples yielded measurable activities for Tritium or the required gamma emitters.
4.
Semiannual shoreline sediment samples are taken at three indicator locations in the discharge canal (C14H, C14M, C14G) and one control location (C09) at Fort Island Gulf gesch. Of the eight samples analyzed, six had measurable amounts of cobalt and three had measurable amounts of cesium. The Cesium 137 concentration at Fort Gulf Island Beach was <14 pCi/L as compered to an average of 63 pCl/L for the indicator locations in the discharge canal. None of the samples taken at Fort Island Gulf Beach had measurable amounts of cobalt. These results are similar to previous years.
27
t TABLE IV-C.1 RAOIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITN NIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION WONROUTINE PATNWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
SEA WATER Tritium 36 230 167 (10/24)
C14N 189 (3/12) 165 (6/12) 0 (pcl/L)
(92 - 310) 0.1 a 315' (105 - 310)
(113 - 235) 1 Spec 36
<LLD 0
Mn-54 4
<LLD Fe-59 8
<LLD
<LLD 0
cm Co-58 4
<LLD
<LLD 0
Co-60 4
<LLD
<LLD 0
<LLD 0
Zn-65 8
<LLD Zr-Nb-95 7
<LLD
<LLD 0
I-131 5
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-134 5
<LLD
<tLD 0
Cs-137 4
<LLD
<LLD 0
Ba-La-140 11
<LLD
<LLD 0
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2 9 of the CR-3 00CM. '
.-.-. ~
. ~ -
.~.
e e
t TABLE IV-C.1.a FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCI/L 1 EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN SEAWATER STATION MONTH M-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 sa-La-140 C13 JAN 169 1 43 246 1 33
<3
<4
<9
<5
<7
<7
<7
<4
<4
<6 FEB 115 1 43 202 1 30
<3
<3
<9
<4
<7
<7
<8
<4
<5
~<6 MAR
<138 171 1 25
<4
<3
<7
<4
<9
<7
<5
<4
<4
<3 APR
<142 242 1 27
<3
<3
<8
<5
<7
<7
<8
<4
<4
<6 MAY
<157 281 1 31
<3
<3
<5
<5
<8
<8
<4
<4
<4
<9 JUN
<140 236 1 32
<3
<3
<7
<4
<8
<7
<5
<4
<4
<7 JUL 189 1 48 248 1 34
<4
<3
<8
<5
<8
<6
<7
<3
<4
<5 AUG 113 1 46 213 1 30
<3
<3
<8
<4
<9
<T
<5
<4
<4
<6 SEP 167 1 47 248 1 28
<4
<3
<8
<4
<7
<T
<6
<3
<4
<5 OCT 235 1 47 281 1 31
<4
<4
<8
<5
<7
<4
<4
<3
<5
<6 NOV
<146 292 1 31
<4
<4
<8
<5
<8
<7
<6
<4
<4
<6 DEC
<149 254 1 30
<4
<3
<7
<4
<8
<6
<4
<5
<4
<8 C14G JAN 137 1 42 214 1 30
<4
<4
<8
<4
<8
<7
<8
<4
<4
<6 FEB 97143 290 1 30
<3
<4
<9
<5
<7
<6
<7
<4
<5
<7 MAR
<138 217 1 29
<3
<4
<10
<3
<6
<6
<5
<3
<4
<7 APR
<131 249 1 33
<3
<4
<6
<5
<8
<7
<8
<4
<4
<5 MAY 92 1 43 215 1 32
<3
<4
<T
<4
<7
<5
<4
<4
<4
<10 JUN
<140 255 1 36
<4
<4
<7
<4
<8
<7
<4
<3
<4
<T JUL 162 1 48 245 1 31
<3
<4
<8
<4
<9
<5
<7
<4
<5
<4 AUG
<147 217 1 32
<4
<3
<5
<4
<7
<7
<6
<4
<5
<4 SEP 200 1 47 246 1 34
<4
<4
<8
<4
<9
<6
<6
<4
<3
<6 oCT 290 1 48 212 1 32
<4
<3
<8
<4
<T
<6
<5
<3
<4
<6 NOV 127 1 47 213 1 34
<3
<4
<5
<4
<8
<7
<7
<5
<4
<6 DEC
<149 179 1 32
<3
<3
<8
<5
<8
<T
<5
<5
<4
<6
=
TABLE IV-C.1e (CONT'D)
FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 PCI/L 7 EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN SEAWATER STATION MONTH H-3 K-40 Mn-54 co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 2n-65 Zr-Mb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Sa-La-140 C14H JAN
<130 282 1 33
<3
<4
<9
<4
<8
<8
<7
<4
<5
<6 FEB 105 1 43 193 1 28
<3
<4
<8
<4
<7
<6
<7
<4
<4
<7 MAR
<138 185 1 31
<3
<3
<8
<4
<T
<6
<6
<4
<4
<5 APR
<131 270 1 31
<3
<4
<T
<4
<9
<6
<7
<4
<4
<4 MAY
<137 202 1 28
<4
<3
<7
<4
<9
<7
<4
<4
<4
<7 JUN
<140 254 1 30
<4
<5
<5
<5
<7
<8
<4
<4
. <3
<5 JUL 151 1 48 236 1 26
<3
<3
<7
<4
<T
<6
<7
<4
<5
<4 AUG
<147 276 1 33
<4
<3
<8
<4
<8
<6
<T
<4
<4
<3 SEP
<144 239 1 31
<3
<4
<9
<3
<8
<7
<6
<4
<3
<5 0
OCT 310 1 49 324 1 32
<4
<4
<7
<4
<8
<6
<4
<4
<4
<8 NOV
<146 236 1 32
<3
<4
<9
<4
<3
<7
<8
<4
<4
<5 DEC
<149 243 1 15
<2
<1
<3
<2
<4
<3
<2
<2
<2
<4
I
'I Seawater 10000 l
l' I
2 x
/%
/ \\
I
/
\\
/
\\
i
/
T
/
\\
N l
1000 m
=
V s
a 1
\\
[
\\
l
\\
/
\\
\\/
\\
l N
~
i...
i 1
100 Oa j
/v
/K\\
// X1 l
P%
i 10 j
l
\\
c' = "
..a 3 --
a
==;=.~_
i w
i x -~
s
=~
=-
a 1
I i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 I
-S-H-3 LLD
l i
d 31
TA8tE IV-C.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORIWG PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR 10TAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITN HIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMER (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
GROUND Tritium 2 230 None
<tLD 0
WATER (pct /L) 7 Spec 2 Mn-54 4
None
<LLD 0
Fe-59 8
None
<LLD 0
Co-58 4
None
<LLD 0
Co-6G 4
None
<LLD 0
g 2n-65 8
None
<LLD 0
Zr-Nb-95 7
None
<LLD 0
I-131 5
None
<LLD 0
Cs-134 5
None
<LLD 0
Cs-137 4
None
<LLD 0
Ba-La-140 11 None
<LLD 0
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 00CM.
e-TABLE IV-C.2.s FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCl/L 1 EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN GROUND WATER STATION NUCLIDE FIRST MALF SECOND MALF C40 M-3
<135
<147 Mn-54
<3
<3 Fe-59
<9
<6 Co-58
<3
<3 Co-60
<4
<4 Zn-65
<8
<7 Zr-Nb-95
<6
<T I-131
<8
<6 Cs-134
<4
<3 Cs-137
<4
<4 Be-La-140
<7
<5 K-40
<63
<48
,w a
__.,-____---.._-..--_-----.---._._a_-----.-__-___._.__.-_a
a-l 4
1 d
Groundwater 1000 l
=
=
=
_^
y - ~;
r 100 >..,
3,..~,-_.
i t
2 10
'\\
\\
i L
- 1. %,,,.-
.c
)
N i
1 i
e i
50 81 52 83 s4 s's s's s'7 s's s's 90 g'i g'2 9'3 N
f 34
TABLE IV-C.3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH NIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTIOM MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
DRINKING Tritium 12 230 None
<LLD 0
WATER (pCi/L) y Spec 12 Mn-54 4
None
<LLD 0
Fe-59 8
None
<LLD 0
co-58 4
None
<LLD 0
co-60 4
None
<LLD 0
Zn-65 8
None
<LLD 0
d Z r-N b-95 7
None
<LLD 0
1-131 5
None
<LLD 0
Cs-134 5
None
<LLD 0
Cs-137 4
None
<LLD 0
Ba-La-140 11 None
<LLD 0
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.
1 t
a I
m
TABLE IV-C.3.o FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pC1/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER STATION DATE M-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 2n-65 Zn-Mb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C07 01-09
<130
<58
<4
<3
<6
<3
<8
<5
<5
<4
<5
<4 04-05
<131 59114
<3
<3
<T
<4
<6
<7
<7
<3
<4
<5 07-10
<147
<60
<4
<4
<T
<3
<7
<T
<4
<4
<4
<6 10-02
<148
<51
<3
<3
<7
<3
<8
<7
<5
<3
<5
<6 C10 01-09
<149
<64
<4
<4
<8
<4
<9
<7
<6
<5
<4
<6 04-04
<131
<54
<3
<3
<10
<4
<7
<6
<9
<4
<4
<6 07-10
<147
<64
<3
<4
<8
<3
<8
<7
<5
<4
<4
<4 10-02
<140
<62
<4
<3
<6
<6
<9
<8
<5
<4
<5
<8 C18 01-09
<135
<61
<3
<3
<7
<4
<8
<6
<4
<4
<4
<5 g
04-04
<131
<58
<3
<4
<T
<4
<7
<6
<9
<4
<4
<6 07-10
<152
<51
<3
<4
<4
<3
<9
<5
<5
<4
<4
<5 10-02
<156
<54
<4
<3
<T
<4
<7
<7
<4
<4
<4
<9
=
Drinking Water a
k A
- ~-
=
i
=
N N
/
~~~
\\
~
N /
\\
\\m
=
=
=
~ - _.,
p w.
i
\\
/
^%,
/
\\
/
\\
/
b r
=
1 a
s o
a e
a s
a s
s s
s s
s 80 81 82 83 84 83 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Year Z H-3 C Cs 137
-M-H-3 LLD
-M-Cs-137 LLD 37
TABLE IV-C.4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATION 1 LOCATION WITH MIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
SHORELINE y Spec 8 SEDIMENT (pci/kg)
Cs-134 14
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 12 63 (3/6)
C14H 91 (2/2)
<LLD 0
(18 - 92) 0.1 a 315*
(90 - 92)
M
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the r=quirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.
TABLE IV-C.4.o FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCit;.g y EMITTERS IN SHORELINE SEDIMENT STATION PERIDD Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Co-60 K-40 Ra-226 C09' First Hetf
<12
<12
<10
<9 462 1 52 392 1 12 second Half
<14
<13
<10
<12 889 1 77 694 1 18 C14H First Half
<23 921 to 3318 447 1 12 2443 1 126 1309 1 23 second Hetf
<26 90 1 11
<20 304 1 12 2624 1 150 1600 1 29 C14M First Half
<15
<14 36 1 6 11816 376 1 57 556 1 16 Second Hetf
<10
<12
<12 3414 307 1 60 624 1 15 U
C14G First Half
<12
<14
<13 2614 263 1 64 936 1 17 Second Half
<16 1815
<15 6216 436 1 97 1323 1 24
'C09 is the control station at Ft. Gulf Island Beach. C14H, M, & G are discharge canst stations.
'Mn-54 was identified at a concentration of 25 1 8 pCi/kg at station C14H. The sample was taken on 2-14-95.
First half samples taken 2-14-95.
Second half samples taken 8-01-95.
'9 e
p i
l l
l; -
I. '
I t
I l'
Shoreline Sediment l
1000 i.
I I
i I
i I
i
,x II 1
fl
\\
11 1
//
\\
/
l~
h i
N
//
\\
/
E
/,
"l
\\/
// N V
8
[
a,
. ~.. -
\\
l
\\
/mN.,
\\
10 f.
1
.. a u
i1 x
i
.... -f a
'~
\\
/.
A U
\\
/
\\
N/
/
N/
k
/\\
/
/
V
,.g i
i I
4 4
4 I
I I
4 4
i i
1 i
I 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Year Z Cs-134 C Cs-137 Cs-134 LLD -M-Cs 137 LLD l
l l.
l t
40 i
m._
Fi' l-IV-D.
INCESTION PATHWAY i
To evaluate the ingestion pathway, fish, oysters, citrus, and watermelon samples are taken.
1 1.
Quarterly carnivorous fish samples were taken at two locations: C29 at the end of the j
discharge canal, and C30, the control location near the mouth of the intake canal. None of the required radionuclides were found in measurable quantitles. The highest Cs-137 LLD for station C29 is 22 pel/kg.
2.
Quarterly oyster samples were taken at the same locations as fish samples, C29 and C30.
j of the isotopes required to be evaluated for, none were found in measurable quantitles, although As 110m was identified in each of the quarterly samples at an average concentration of 609 pcl/kg.
3.
Monthly broadleaf vegetation samples were taken at two indicator locations, C48a and C48b, and one control location, C47. Six of twenty four indicator samples had measurable amounts of Cs 137 with an everage concentration of 38 pC1/kg and a range of 24 to 65 pC1/kg. Nine
[
of the twelve control station samples had measurable amounts of Cs 137 with an average of 90 pcl/kg and a range of 12 to 305 pC1/kg.
4.
Annual watermelon and cit us (oranges) samples are taken at stations C04 and C19,
)
respectively. Cesium-137 was measured in the citrus sample at a tevel of 4 pCl/ks, and at a l
levet of 75 pel/kg in the watermelon sample.
i i
i i
l I
l i
l l
l l
l l
d I
i 41
TABLE IV-D.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMSER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUM8ER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH NIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
CARNIVOROUS 1 Spec 8 FISM (pcl/kg)
Mn-54 9
<LLD
<LLD 0
Fe-59 16
<LLD
<LLD 0
<LLO O
co-58 9
<LLD t.
Co-60 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
+
Zn-65 17
<tLD
<LLD 0
<LLD 0
Cs-134 9
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 9
<LLD
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Tabte 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.
+
TABLE IV-D.1.a FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCl/kg 7 EMITTERS IN CARNIVOROUS FISN STATION OUARTER Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Fe-59 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C29 1
<23
<24
<25
<39
<45
. < 18
<16 1964 1 194 2
<17
<18
<20
<35
<47
<21
<21 2005 1 213 3
<16
<17
<27
<38
<48
<21
<22 2021 1 186 4
<22
<20
<18
<41-
<30
<20
<20 1467 1 209 C30 1
<18
<19
<24
<47
<45
<21
<20 2199 1 181 2
<20
<16
<27
<37
<45
<20
<19 2328 1 213 3
<20
<16
<17
<42
<44
<20
<20 2257 1 204 4
<20
<19
<28
<38
<47
<17
<19 2428 1 199 0
n
Carnivorous Fish 100 I
l m
/N
/\\
Tx
/
N
/ ~\\
/NN /
/\\
)
\\
/ X/'
E.,
8
N.,,
\\
\\
s R
10 E
^
\\
l l
i S
/
\\
\\
/ A /
T
\\
//
\\
/
w
=
\\./
V v
1 81 82 83 N4 85 86 87 88 89 NO N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 Year Z Cs-134 C Cs-137
-M-Cs-134 Ld -E-Cs-i97 LLD
)
1 l
l 44
,e TABLE IV-D.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH NIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
OYSTERS y Spec 8 (pCl/kg)
Mn-54 9
<LLD
<LLD 0
Fe-59 16
<LLD
<LLD 0
Co-58 9
<LLD
<LLD 0
n*
Co-60 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Zn-65 17
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-134 9
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 9
<LLD
<LLD 0
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.
,e TABLF IV-D.2.a FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCl/kg 7 EMITTERS IN OYSTERS STATION OUARTER nn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Fe-59 2n-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C29 1
<33
<37
<49
<77
<86
<33
<49 1312 1 239 2
<23
<36
<40
<56
<67
<30
<35 1345 1 263 3
<15
<16
<17
<31
<36
<17
<17 912 1 126 4
<12
<12
<15
<23
<27
<14
<14 792 1 99 C30 1
<19
<21
<21
<47
<49
<25
<25 1672 1 246 2
<14
<21
<25
<40
<47
<20
<22 1369 1 205 3
<19
<17
<17
<34
<49
<21
<19 1839 1 185 4
<16
<13
<21
<33
<42
<16
<19 1630 1 144 Ag-110m was quantified in four samples taken at station C29. Concentration of 2-15-95 sample was 1293 pCi/ks, 5-18-95 sample was 446 pCi/kg, 8-29-95 sample was 473 pCi/kg, and the 11-18-95 sample 224 pcl/kg.
.=
b i
i 1
4 Oysters 100
/N
_/
\\
T VT
/
A i
/
/
1 to 1
\\
/
5 A
1
\\
~
Q A
/
V T
/
\\
/
\\
/
i
\\l
/
V i
1 i
i i
ie i
i i
i i
i i
l 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Year Z Cs-137
-E-Cs 137 LLD 4
k 1
47
TABLE IV-D.3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEM8ER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITN HIGNEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
VEGETATION y Spec 36 (pCi/kG) 1-131 9
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-134 8
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 8
38 (6/24)
C48A 41 (4/12) 90 (9/12) 0 (24 - 65) 0.8 a 30' (27 - 65)
(12 - 305)
E
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.
TABLE IV-D.3.s FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCl/kg 0F 1 EMITTERS IN BROAD LEAF VEGETATION STATION MONTH I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C47 JAN
<15
<11 305 1 13 2613 1 131 FEB
<14
<14 45 1 8 3282 1 187 MAR
<11
<11 1214 3262 1 147 APR
<14
<9 5917 3256 1 137 MAY
<14
<15 61 1 11 3444 1 165 JUN
<10
<12 123 1 8 3784 1 139 JUL
<16
<15 86 1 10 3826 1 181 AUG
<15
<14 55 1 8 4049 1 184 SEP
<13
<13
<18 3984 1 190 OCT
<10
<13
<12 2708 1 126 NOV
<15
<16 68 1 9 2417 1 156 DEC
<15
<18
<16 4200 1 186 C45A JAN
<15
<8 65 1 8 2086 1 105 FEB
<14
<12 37 1 11 2512 1 149 MAR
<16
<16
<22 3191 1 182 APR
<17
<11
<13 3070 1 132 MAY
<10
<8 35 1 6 2473 1 117 JUN
<11
<10
<12 2110 1 127 JUL
<15
<11 2716 1949 1 125 AUG
<15
<9
<12 2387 1 131 SEP
<16
<16
<16 2972 1 196 OCT
<14
<16
<19 3747 1 188 NOV
<16
<11
<12 3826 1 149 DEC
<16
<14
<19 2667 1 173
TABLE IV-D.3.a (CONT'D)
FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pCl/kB 0F 7 EMITTERS IN BROAD LEAF VEGETATION STATION MONTH I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C485 JAN
<12
<13
<15 4939 t 176 FEB
<5
<5
<5 4701 1 76 MAR
<17
<16 24 1 7 7069 1 262 APR
<14
<8
<11 1399 1 96 MAY
<11
<11
<14 6455 1 192 JUN
<13
<15
<13 5810 1 198 JUL
<15
<14
<15 3698 1 148 AUG
<16
<15
<14 4268 1 179 SEP
<18
<20
<20 3349 1 192 CCT
<14
<16
<17 2191 1 149 NOV
<13
<15
<18 3402 1 161 DEC
<17
<19 37113 4666 1 212
,o
I Vegetation -
1000 w
A I\\
s a
I\\
\\
/\\
l\\
i
\\/
I\\
ca 100 i
\\
l
\\
i
\\
I
\\
/
c L
9 l
\\
%sh N..
I
\\
/
/K I-
"1.
\\
/\\
/
/
\\"NA.
5 f
N.k./_.m_ [
k j
A F
V N
1 10 i
i
\\
/
~
_1 I
l 1
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Year Z l-131 C Cs-137
I 4
J l
51 i
1
TABLE IV-D.4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. 5-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ANALYSIS AND NUMSER OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITN NIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE PATHWAY OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD)'
RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (UNITS)
WATERMELON 1 Spec 1 (PCl/kg) 1-131 9
<LLD None O
Cs-134 8
<LLD None 0
i Cs-137 8
75 (1/1)
C04 75 (1/1)
None 0
g 6.3 a 45' CITRUS 1 Spec 1 (pCl/kg)
I-131 9
<LLD None O
Cs-134 8
<LLD None O
Cs-137 8
4 (1/1)
C19 4 (1/1)
None 0
j i
8.5 a 60*
l l
'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.
i l
a A a* ', _
- TABLE IV D.4.s FLORIDA POWER CORP. - CR3 - 1995 pcl/kg 0F 7 EMITTERS IN WATERMELON AND CITRUS STATION Monin 3-131 Cs-134 cs-137 K-40 C04 - Watermelon May
<5
<5 75 t 5 941 t 59 C19 - citrus January
<2
<2 4t1 1734 t 30 0
I
,