ML23270B902

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:23, 12 October 2023 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Review of Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Capsule N Technical Report
ML23270B902
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/2023
From: Ballard B
NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL3
To: Conboy T
Northern States Power Company, Minnesota
References
EPID L-2023-LRO-0010
Download: ML23270B902 (1)


Text

September 29, 2023 Mr. Thomas A. Conboy Site Vice President Northern States Power Company - Minnesota Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089

SUBJECT:

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2 - REVIEW OF REACTOR VESSEL MATERIAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM CAPSULE N TECHNICAL REPORT (EPID L-2023-LRO-0010)

Dear Mr. Conboy:

By letter dated March 16, 2023 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML23075A345), Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (NSPM, the licensee) submitted report WCAP-18795-NP, Analysis of Capsule N from the Xcel Energy Prairie Island Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program. The report was provided in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50, appendix H, section IV. Testing was performed in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E185-82, Standard Practice for Conducting Surveillance Tests for Light-Water Cooled Nuclear Power Reactor Vessels, as specified in 10 CFR, part 50, appendix H, paragraph III.B.1.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has completed its review of NSPMs submittal as documented in the enclosed staff evaluation. The NRC staff concludes that NSPM has provided the information required by the regulations and that no additional follow-up is required at this time. This completes the NRC staffs efforts for EPID L-2023-LRO-0010.

T. Conboy If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-0680 or via e-mail at Brent.Ballard@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Brent T. Ballard, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-306

Enclosure:

Review of Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Capsule N Technical Report cc: Listserv

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REVIEW OF REACTOR VESSEL MATERIAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM CAPSULE N TECHNICAL REPORT NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-306

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated March 16, 2023 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML23075A344), Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (NSPM, the licensee) submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) an evaluation of the testing results of reactor vessel radiation surveillance program Capsule N for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (Prairie Island),

Unit 2, in accordance with the Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50, appendix H, Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Requirements. The evaluation report is titled WCAP-18795-NP, Revision 0, Analysis of Capsule N from the Xcel Energy Prairie Island Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program, dated December 2022.

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The regulations in 10 CFR, part 50, appendix H, requires licensees to implement a material surveillance program to monitor changes in the fracture toughness properties of ferritic materials in the reactor vessel beltline region of light-water nuclear power reactors which result from exposure of these materials to neutron irradiation and the thermal environment.

Paragraph IV.A of appendix H to 10 CFR, part 50, specifies that a summary technical report for each capsule withdrawal and the associated test results must be submitted within 18 months of the date of capsule withdrawal, unless an extension is granted by the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

Paragraph IV.B of appendix H to 10 CFR, part 50, requires that capsule evaluation reports include all data specified by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E185-82 and the results of all fracture toughness tests conducted on the surveillance capsule materials in both the unirradiated and irradiated condition.

Paragraph IV.C of appendix H to 10 CFR, part 50, requires that if a change in the technical specifications (TSs) is required, either in the pressure-temperature (P/T) limits or in the operating procedures required to meet the limits, the expected date for submittal of the revised TSs must be provided with the report.

Enclosure

The NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.99, Revision 2, Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials, May 1988 (ML003740284), provides guidance on general procedures acceptable to the NRC staff for calculating effects of neutron radiation embrittlement of low-alloy steels used for light-water-cooled reactor vessels.

3.0 NRC STAFF EVALUATION 3.1 Surveillance Capsule Program Irradiation surveillance of the reactor vessel is necessary to assure that the vessel material will maintain its fracture toughness throughout the service life of the plant. The surveillance capsule contains both dosimeters as well as archival material samples to be irradiated to levels comparable to those expected to be accrued by the reactor vessel at the end of its licensed period. Under the program, fracture toughness test data is obtained from the material specimens exposed in the surveillance capsules which are withdrawn periodically from the reactor vessel.

The Prairie Island, Unit 2, reactor pressure vessel (RPV) material surveillance program was developed based on ASTM E185-70 Standard Recommended Practice for Surveillance Tests for Nuclear Reactor Vessels. The program contains a total of six capsules. Capsule N is the fifth capsule that has been removed. The licensee removed Capsule N from the reactor vessel at 40.64 effective full-power years (EFPY).

3.2 Neutron Fluence Evaluation A fluence evaluation utilizing the neutron transport and dosimetry cross-section libraries was derived from the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF) database (specifically, ENDF/B-VI). The licensee reported that Capsule N was removed at 40.64 EFPY and received a fluence of 8.41 x 1019 n/cm2 (newtons per square centimeter) (E >1.0 MeV).

In WCAP-18795-NP, Revision 0, the licensee stated that the transport calculations supporting the analysis of the fluence of Capsule N were carried out using the RAPTOR-M3G computer code. While RAPTOR-M3G has been reviewed and approved by the NRC staff for referencing in licensing applications via WCAP-18124-NP-A, Fluence Determination with RAPTOR-M3G and FERRET (ML18204A010), the licensee has not been approved by the NRC to incorporate this methodology into the licensing basis for Prairie Island, Unit 2. From the NRC staffs review of appendix A of the licensees submittal, which compares the measured capsule dosimetry results with those of previously withdrawn capsules, the NRC finds that no safety significant issue is presented or implied by the results of the capsule surveillance report. This statement should not be construed as NRC approval for use of RAPTOR-M3G as a method for evaluation for Prairie Island, Unit 2. The use of RAPTOR-M3G would require appropriate incorporation of the methodology into the Prairie Island, Unit 2, licensing basis.

The licensee projected the peak clad/base metal interface vessel fluence at 54 EFPY (end-of-license extension) of plant operation to be 5.66 x 1019 n/cm2 (E > 1.0 MeV). Using the RG 1.99, Revision 2, attenuation formula and a vessel thickness of 6.692 inches, the licensee calculated vessel peak quarter-thickness (1/4T) and three-quarter thickness (3/4T) fluence of 3.79 x 1019 n/cm2 and 1.70 x 1019 n/cm2, respectively.

3.3 Material Test Results The licensee performed mechanical tests of the Charpy V-notch and tensile specimens in Capsule N in accordance with 10 CFR, part 50, appendix H, and ASTM Specification E185-82.

3.3.1 Transition Temperature Shift The reactor vessel lower shell forging D (Heat # 22642) Charpy specimens, oriented with the longitudinal axis of the specimen parallel to the major working direction (tangential orientation),

resulted in an irradiated 30 ft-lb (foot-pound) transition temperature of 148.2 °F (degree Fahrenheit). This results in a 30 ft-lb transition temperature increase of 176.5 °F.

The reactor vessel lower shell forging D (Heat # 22642) Charpy specimens, oriented with the longitudinal axis of the specimen perpendicular to the major working direction (axial orientation),

resulted in an irradiated 30 ft-lb transition temperature of 152.9 °F. This results in a 30 ft-lb transition temperature increase of 154.1 °F.

The weld material (Heat # 2721, Flux Type UM89, Lot # 1263) Charpy specimens resulted in an irradiated 30 ft-lb transition temperature of 59.5 °F. This results in a 30 ft-lb transition temperature increase of 135.6 °F.

The reactor vessel heat-affected zone (HAZMAT) material Charpy specimens resulted in an irradiated 30 ft-lb transition temperature of 10.9 °F. This results in a 30 ft-lb transition temperature increase of 145.5 °F.

The licensees test results show that the measured shifts in the 30 ft-lb transition temperature of all the surveillance materials are higher than the RG 1.99, Revision 2, position 1.1, predictions.

The test results show that the RG 1.99, Revision 2, prediction is not accurate and not conservative when the RPV material is irradiated to a high neutron fluence. The NRC staff will consider the implications of the non-conservativism in future licensing actions, such as when the licensee evaluates reactor pressure vessel embrittlement for license renewal.

3.3.2 Upper Shelf Energy The average upper-shelf energy of lower shell forging D (Heat # 22642) (tangential orientation) resulted in an average energy decrease of 22.7 ft-lb. This decrease results in an irradiated average upper-shelf energy of 125 ft-lb for the tangentially oriented specimens.

The average upper-shelf energy of lower shell forging D (Heat # 22642) (axial orientation) resulted in an average energy decrease of 17.2 ft-lb. This decrease results in an irradiated average upper-shelf energy of 89 ft-lb for the axially oriented specimens.

The average upper-shelf energy of the surveillance program weld material (Heat # 2721)

Charpy specimens resulted in an average energy decrease of 8.3 ft-lb. This decrease results in an irradiated average upper-shelf energy of 95 ft-lb.

The average upper-shelf energy of the HAZMAT material Charpy specimens resulted in an average energy decrease of 32 ft-lb. This decrease results in an irradiated average upper-shelf energy of 82 ft-lb.

The measured percent decreases in upper-shelf energy of all the surveillance materials, i.e., the Lower Shell Forging D (Heat # 22642) and weld material (Heat # 2721) are less than the RG 1.99, Revision 2, position 1.2 predictions. These results show that RG 1.99 method is conservative in the predicting the upper-shelf energy of the reactor vessel material.

3.3.3 Credibility Evaluation The NRC staff notes that the credibility assessment performed in appendix D of WCAP-18795-NP, Revision 0, found the surveillance weld data to be credible and the forging data to be non-credible in accordance with the RG 1.99, Revision 2. The licensee stated in its evaluation that although the lower shell forging D did not meet Criterion 3, both materials may still be used in determining the upper-shelf energy decrease in accordance with RG 1.99, Revision 2, position 2.2. The NRC staff reviewed the credibility evaluation and had no objections. However, surveillance data determined to be non-credible may still need to be factored into licensing calculations, such as P/T limits.

4.0 CONCLUSION

The licensee is expected to incorporate the updated surveillance data into the next revision of the Prairie Island, Unit 2, P/T limits report, as required by 10 CFR, part 50, appendix G. The licensee specified an expected submittal date in their submission and has submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise Prairie Island Technical Specification 5.6.6, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR), to incorporate use of newer analytical methods to determine the RCS P/T limits and cold overpressure mitigation system setpoints (ML22343A257). The LAR is currently under review by NRC staff.

The NRC staff finds that the licensees report of reactor vessel surveillance capsule N from Unit 2 satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR, part 50, appendix H, and that the licensee performed tests and calculations based on 10 CFR 50, appendix H and RG 1.99, Revision 2, appropriately. The staff also concludes that the licensees submittal meets the reporting requirements in section IV of 10 CFR, part 50, appendix H.

Principal Contributors: MBenson, NRR JTsao, NRR SBhatt, NRR Date: September 29, 2023

ML23270B902 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL3/PM NRR/DORL/LPL3/LA NRR/DSS/SNSB/BC NAME BBallard SRohrer PSahd DATE 9/26/2023 9/27/23 7/18/2023 OFFICE NRR/DNRL/NVIB/BC NRR/DORL/LPL3/BC NRR/DORL/LPL3/PM NAME ABuford (DWidrevitz for) JWhited BBallard DATE 9/14/2023 9/28/2023 9/29/2023