ML20100A075

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:15, 24 September 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Rejection of Util 841114 Request That NRC Forward Exercise Matls to FEMA to Support Emergency Exercise During Wk of 850211.Conduct of Emergency Exercise Constitutes Pursuit of Unlawful Objective
ML20100A075
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 11/28/1984
From: Gallagher J
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-#484-383 OL, NUDOCS 8412030447
Download: ML20100A075 (1)


Text

lWD J g$ bse s /

[g COUNTY OF SUFFOLK as v  :, -

i L< H a i.

h L OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE 5 d

JOHN C. GALLAGHER i CHIEF DEPUTV

! PETER F. COH ALAN -

SUF FOL M COUNTY E XEC UTIVE 3

" November 28, 1984 j

5 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director g d

m office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation k g

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

3 7920 Norfolk Avenue 5 j Room p-404A unt j Bethesda, Maryland 20814 r E

a g-

Dear Mr. Denton:

r By letter dated November 14, 1984, the Long Island Lighting Company E

{ requested that you transmit to FEMA materials intended "to support a =

-f graded exercise whic h I 11.C0 is planning f or the week of February 11, $

[ 1985." This is to advise you that Suffolk Coenty is opposed to any y f, such exereise and that the NRC should in no wav promete, assist, or -

-T the objections of t his County govern- ',-

~4. concur in such an exercise over 8- ment.

E b LILCO's implementation of its offsite emergency plan would be E d unlawful under the Const it ut ion and havelaws filedof lawsuits the State of New York.

against g

d a Both Suffolk County and New York State -

conclusive order LILCO in State Supreme Court in order to secure a -

to that effect.

In our view, therefore, IILCO's exercise of its -

_g plan would be in pursuit of an unlawful objective I would y

=

also stress that it would be an insult to the people and govern-ment of Sulfolk County g--

Given thc p< ~;t u r e of t- h e Shoreham case before the courts and the NRC, as well as the continuing position of this County that effec-w 3

1. I I .CO ' s request to forward any impossible, we ask that von reject

__ exercise materials to FEMA and that you refrain from t ak ing any intrusir>n hv LlLCO into the police r- steps which contribute to anFor vour information, I am enelosing a powers of Suffolk Countv. Reagan which expresses the copy of a letter written hv president Administ rat f on' , posit lon.

s, Sitzcere ly you

' / /2 0 /

84120;'0447 841128 (f /

mc

/

PDR ADCCK 05000322 /

fohn C Gallaghr {-

F PDR [

ChiefDeputyCpy[tntyExecutive 80 dEE.d"h e (516 360-4000 S

HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 VETER ANS MEMORI AL HiGHW AV

m w. ..

fe h COUNTY OF CUFFOLK ggL ' bM -

pTue

! l OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE A PETER F. COHALAN JOHN C. GALLAGHER surrotx couNrv executive cwear ocPury November 28, 1984 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S.~ Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Room P-404A Eethesda, Maryland 20814

Dear Mr. Denton:

By letter dated November 14, 1984, the Long Island Lighting Company requested that you tra'nsmit to FDIA materials intended "to support a graded exercise which LILCO is planning for the week of February 11, 1985." This is to advise you that Suffolk County is opposed to any such exercise and that the NRC should in no way promote, assist, or concur in such an exercise over thn.- objections of this County govern-ment.

LILCO's implementation of its offsite emergency plan would be unlawful under the Constitution and laws of the State of New York.

Both Suffolk County and New York State have filed lawsuits against LILCO in State Supreme Court in order to secure a conclusive order to that effect. In our view, therefore, LILCO's exercise of its plan would be in pursuit of an unlawful objective. I would also stress that it would be an insult to the people and govern-ment of Suffolk County.

Given the posture of the Shoreham case before the courts and the NRC, as well as the continuing position of this County that effec-tive emergency preparedness for a nuclear accident at Shoreham is impossible, we ask that you reject LILCO's request to forward any exercise materials to FDIA and that you refrain from taking any steps which contribute to an intrusion by LILCO into the police powers of Suffolk County. For your information, I am enclosing a copy of a letter written by President Reagan which expresses the Administration's position.

Si cerely you s,

~

I 8412030447 841128 'm PDR ADOCK 05000322

  • F PDR John C. Gallagh Chief Deputy C nty Executive

[{

3 dfi@. ""I' i 0 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHw Ay a HA uPPAuGE. N.Y.11788 e (516)360-4000

-.-- . . . . . . . ~ . . , . . ,

, , t-9- ,

'.L 1

~

. ' {

s n. , .:

  • '/ .a ,. \',

s f ' "j 4 . ' r. :

. .-4 --  % _.-~~~~mM'*w- --=.6%- A--

we ..:  %.,..A.,. y g.

.J!

g, .;

- 13FJ2ATRICK & LOCKHART ji! ,

te 1900 M STREET. N.W.

p <

7 ' WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 - -

w

i 4

BY MESSENGER ,

i. -

i t

I t

t -

Mr. Harold R. Denton,. Director -+ ~

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  !~

l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue,' Room P-404A Bethesda, Maryland 20814

.y ,;

r i.

I e  !. s .-

A p

f, ,

r O

4 4

. y- S:

~

~

3'.

s I o *

(

w.

..r .. g - . .,.n ..i,..,... .r i- . .. . . .. . . . . . ._ _ .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _