ML20207Q088

Partially Withheld Rept of Inquiry Q4-83-001 Re Alleged on-duty Intoxication by Facility Personnel.Related Documentation Encl

ML20207Q088
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper, 05000000
Issue date:	01/06/1983
From:	Driskill D NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
To:
Shared Package
ML20207Q075	List: ML20207Q074 ML20207Q081 ML20207Q085 ML20207Q088 ML20207Q091 ML20207Q098 ML20207Q099 ML20207Q104 ML20207Q108 ML20207Q115 ML20207Q128
References
FOIA-84-827 Q4-83-001, Q4-83-1, NUDOCS 8701230006
Download: ML20207Q088 (4)

Text

'\ .

~ B t m m m 7 1"t l' ~..

U. 5. NUCL EAh REGUL A10RY C0K".15510t, C o u .' . . .

0FFICE OF INVES11GA110ts5 FIELD OFFICC REG 10f. IV

~ ~

REPORT OF INQUIRY January 6, 1983 SUBJEC1: COOPER NUCLEAR STATION ALLEGED ON-DUTY INT 0XICATION BY REPOP.1 NUMEEF.: Q4-E3-001

1. On January 5,1982, a letter was received by the Regional Administrator, Recion IV. U. S. huclear Reculatory Co rnission f rom, alcoholabusebyl concerning allegea per.}onnel wornng at Cooper huclear Station, brownsville, Nebraska. related having heard on numerous occasions statements by various persons TMich indicate person-nel and cated arid /or with a, hangover, supervisors. relatedat Coop.er Station repoi'), for duty int concern that some licensee managencnt personne.1 tre aware'of tiel ' pro 51em and that corrective action has not been taken.[ stated believes this matter creates a dangerous prottlem." 'requeste'd be afforded confi-dentiality concerning" ',reportiny of this mattFr. letter is Attachment (1).

2.

On January 6,1982,[investThator.was concernbyreporting stated telephonically contacted regard

, ini Missouri, a comu_ nit'y near coope,r Nucle (r Station and that kr.ows mdfiy people who work at the plant. stated that during The weet prior to Christmas,19E2, an unnamTd aquairitance (who t resides at an unknover. location near Omaha, Nebraskal) re1 3 ted tof that he o! s c nc c' i Ce u.erjucita r Station at a . G.so.:ri stisict 1:anor., l state friend relatid tha*, thc 'was into>.icated to the~ extent 4 e shou 4t .have beep (. riving an altor.5 bile and u.at he pas on.his way to worb , stated, friend al.so said the 1(phonetic) was 1tated LcateMnameo]this obserf7 tion was made MingThLr early Forning h~o friend indi-

3. jstated the above'related occasion was not the first (ime .has-

'hard .com.ents relating to alcohol abuse by Cooper .peMothel.

. stated that has previously heard people mare corrnents which indica-tec'Cooperf personnel report for duty in an intoxicated condi-tion. As irn example / related having heard make the statement, durin'g the fall,1982, that her husband'"had no busTness coing to o rt" tht last two days du2 to his injoxicated condition, also related having observed in an of f-duty capacity, exifa local tavern heavily intoxicahed in.recent months.

f p p g 6 e70226 hj HEATH 84-827 ppg f. .

m

,'  ?-001

~ ~

4. stated that during the last week of December 1982 talked with a former Cooper Station who related that romt uniderttified M ooper Station personht12eport for work drunk. ,,

stated alsa recently,t~alked with a Cooper 5tation who mafe c6ments about fersonnel beiftg intoxicated on futy. J also purportedly stated frequently comes to wor 3.la,te and/

rintficatedandthathissupervisordoesnothingaboutit.

~~ stated gave the impresjion he,was upset abou,t "the way thTng1I were oing"-6t Coopef Station. alJo si,ated had recently talked with a,CoopYr Statitfn who1ad' stated, when queried conckning personnel bethg intdxicated while on duty, that it (intoxication) was "k%d of a routine thing." stated that also said that waskno$

ledgeable-ef the situation and " allows anything." Mated personal impression is 1 hat this problem is creatiwj some " friction

• J between Cooper Station jpersonnel and that management's failure to take any corrective %ction is ttmpounding the problems that it creates.

5. ' stated that' 'is an advocate of the nuclear plant but believes Shese octurrences coIIldtreate a safety problem for the com,y,nity and Jther employees at the plant. During this interview request for confidentiality concerning this matthT. J reiterated Attachment (1) -

L M he. d {

D. D. Driskill, Investigator Office of Investigations Field Office Region IV r,

.. {

APPROVED BY: _ s D. D. Driskill, Acting Director Office of Investigations Field Office Region IV cc: J. T. Collins, RIV W. J. Ward, 01:DF0

@HME i ,JAfatmrT"'N"r .

, _ - . . - -. - .. = .

pl5 ALLEGATION REVIEW

~

CASE NUMBER 4-83-A-02 DATE OPENE0 03/16/83 FACILITY NAME Cooper 50-298 Intoxication by SUBJECT g SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Anonymous HUMBER OF ALLEG. 1 ASSIGNED TO PSS CROSS REF. NO.

ACTION SCHEDULED Followup on Licensee's Proposed FIRST/LAST NAME J. Kelly DATE ASSIGNED 01/16/83 REPORT NUMBER 1st: 0000000000 2nd:

Lst:

FUNCTIONAL AREA FiS NUMBER 8-728-8100 DUE DATE 00/00/0000 ALLEGAT]ON SUBSTANT 05/0 SORT CODE X DATE CLOSED 03/23/83 ACTION OFFICE RIV DETAILS: The allegen has related insta_nces of personal knowledge and second hand information of ariving at work intoxicated. This condition has appareTil3F gone with the7no.: ledge of the supervisors without any actior, or their part. This information was"pessed to the licensee f or his irvtstigaticr. itt licenstt's it.vt sticaticr. ccr.:1u ec that one individual had an apparer.t off duty problem and this was being dealt with. The remaining allegations were determined to be inaccurate.

l l

l l

O t

)(o

.-- __.jput

,i CONVERSATION RECORD '(, 4 p 'p c , y p y, g ;_

" * *i

~ COrdi F ! N,"! '

• f-T1 t ( h40t.!

. '" N "'E* '

t o;pt.or cd V. sit / Conte' ente

, _' INCOMINL e

%TGDirit i

he wg g,e ag esovs cos1stitt 08, oh C fd 1 A:* os ,a .ist o. r0+. . ,, c . , , , , , , i g i g ,,,pn g u;. - - - - - -

w.se-%Ou e.

.Q g_ .

Le o Le swr - NPPD 12s - u s (

~~

Comc.ccmMacns _

CuM Aw

% ( m ;c c ~ 1. ',C

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

5 *.s e.* f i A R S

(-

1e r _ n orp c.c M *L E _ 2 5 k E O_d .

6 g M ls PJ.Z3$ Ml q A jf U h { }q { Mf,%,Qt%S 9 o' 9 UGT v.sh 'pc

\ ( \

{ I

. I

.c C' 4L Jdo.=n{9a k - C-ra da O'y 3 _ DF S S &,

~

11 U Q & . -

n_4

[QQ% -tM l'l *~ .S D l I _^ f_L % & ..C

{ l- -

n \

g )C$ A (M A. ].. . D. Xt s /lc_qpita PE rs 4 [g e_ _

Q iIJ.%d P - L' 2 C_s Z'J

. \

~

C_. .

Pf ?. l^ C' " -.

.?L' &f.b - k U.- Eyo'hdDUN ._SS.$f

. .L e

\, s e - c cas & .y.51 Z- C.c. c % . .b, r L. _ m s u i-).e . s..=.e .c _. v e.-- r ,..< tw Q

.C @ lid. 2 g c tu. _OYJ 1 Llc"N .7 e;-- BrE' -l< e cu e c'._ -V+s

, I. - -T t, t ~- ~

't S_C Org L4. C.7._.tA A

O.'~l Ca.7 A c.a('_ lu VES'I. f )h.' D U M,,_. ,_

6,. L ..J.ar &{.2 log .j 1W d-ic_cfm.ecz'_

{ /" [ 'f f^ i h@*- . e- ' e 5 A 0.r_1 L % ) () '3 . _ 6_

1. .

9 . . c2 D . W '- E l't .O .4,x., - "_

t . r ,t

• l-o . ' '

~C ._ l'*.J.Q Lt. b~.E_,. _ I*N.~p -k . '1'C "r~' IC C; i's .*w  % i .L .WS/ / d aJ_. C" _ ._

O(

LM Q .5__ G Ci'& ' (C0 t. W' Al'16 ::.' 9t QUlFJ!* j.23 ID .0T4 C-D.LM. . C#**4 PIY i'4O ht C1

,l- .e4-'b':'Cs' pe' c 6 V P S r it'eb l- to vit.ef' 4{n d toL u. , l

~~T n'd 6csJ0 W)

• 1t>C ( N '*/ '

b L'Q o-a.A t." tA t.gh LP-3 c.e, r4 h >  : 'et e.1i% LOS sl 5 > '1W- *- ss.1ust

~

pa.1L M G;,% [ y

}'-?_t,sg, g'q,_

3

.,te csec t t.r . __

L 1 e} r _ _ __ _ = . ._ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _, _ .

AC1tOli 1 Ant ti sic.ss1on t laitt ;ont.

l so m -sc4 , g ., . g: , . in.t 3 ,:: CO'iVER51110N RECORD QOj',,ts'. "I'i #[$!! ' .

O8 ~

' h.". ,,2 r, W 'It h ri'

• r r. .

=wan u.#o ilu Uh m ai m , J

<