ML20207Q128
| ML20207Q128 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 04/24/1984 |
| From: | Madsen G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Johnson W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207Q075 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-827 NUDOCS 8701230078 | |
| Download: ML20207Q128 (9) | |
Text
'
tiv.it s ti 11 r li !
u - F f - M NitCL I /.8 F.I GLIL Al ORY COr.'. MIS 5 TON b,
Fil GiON It t,<,#* **.-
(11 M AN PL AZ A Driv [. sutil 1000
......T' A%INGTON. If X As 76011 APR 2 4 BB4 (l
/
MEMORANDUM FOR:
W. D. J d 5 :r., Chtef, Reactor Project Section C, RPE2 FROM:
G. L. Madse., Reactor Inspector
SUBJECT:
INTERVIEW 0F
- APRIL 17, 1984 On April 17, 1984, I was present during an interview of by of the Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E) quality investigation team.
The interview started at 11:20 a.m. and was conduc+ed in theparkinglotofthej The interview'was taped'by KG&t' with the full knowledge and consent of (The tape and transcript will be available to the NRC at the Wolf D~ reek site). My presence at the interview was principally as an observer of the KG&E Quality First Task Team in action.
At the outset of the interview, it was made clear that I was present as a representative of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
In that the interview was being taped, the discussjons proceeded at a rapid rate and extensive note taking was not possible.
led most of the questioning.
The discussions included the following:
1.
Reasons for Quitting Daniel the First Time a.
Received only 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> training when hired as an engineer reviewer.
Not a formal training program.
b.
,. Concerns relatine to inaking duplicates of certified documents.
refused te process.
s c.
Violation of docurent processing procedures.
d.
Some illegible documentation.
8701230078 870116 PDR FOIA HEATHS 4-827 PDR D l'1
W. D. Jc.t.m e-2.
Traininc a.
Individual A not qualified.
Didn't know much ab:ut document Co" trol.
b.
Individual B and Individual C quit at about the same time of' I
departure.
c.
No formal training program for engineering reviews.
3.
Harassment feels that he was harassed by management.
a.
When assigned to B0P activities, he and Individual D sat for 3 days with no assignment, b.
Assigned 8-inch thick package to review; given deadlines for completion.
c.
For making issues.
d.
concern was job security and not wanting to mess up his work
'- record ~which he believes to be good.
4.
Work Record believes his record was good. Absences for such things as colds,
' car t~ rouble, funeral, wife in hospital, etc.
5.
Further Specific Concerns of a.
Ha-:linc of traveler turnever reccrds.
He refe-enced drawing problems identified during my interview with hir on February 22, 1984 I provided the drawing number - C-M-03HA03, Rev. 7.
b.
Engineering change reports given to me on February 22, 1984.
I provided numbers I-M-03HA03 - ECR01, ECR02, and ECR03.
c.
System discrepancy itst where a clerk lined out comments by Individual E, a professional engineer, which was approved by Individual A.
I provided identification number as EF-1.
v D. J :
n.- %
(
E,. :r.te,iews with Daniel indicated he had a I hour discussion with Individual F;
~he.e.er,'he did not believe Individual F kept notes. At that time ir:' ated he supplied the sar.e ir.formatior, as he was giving durinc~' his-t interview.
7.
Affiliation with NRC indicated he had made an application for employment with NRC but hadrdceivednoresponse.
E.
Drugs related to knowledge of the sale of 100 uppers for $50 in the parking lot, about 3 days prior to his quitting the first time.
Sold by an individual referred to as Individual G.
Individual B and ndividual H were present. Believes Individual G worksin{,
aintenance.
l indicated drugs are readily available. Gaye,the name
'Indtfidual I, a as someone with t
i knowledge of drug availability.
9.
Sort of Investigation Needed believes that interviews of terminated employees would force a
' complete audit.
In the area of travelers, _
thinks too many people are handling FourgroupsdUingfaviewsnotgettingsameanswers.
documents.
Some of paper is lost in handling. Control of documentation lacking.
Concerns on safety,relatpd work.
If handling in same manner as nonsafety-related,g believes there would be substitute documents which were pripared for lost documents.
believes training on Daniel's programs needs review.
- m. -. _.
k. D. Jet ac'
- lo r.is knowledge, thert are no major problex.s with hangers.
concerns are with piping systems and the related
" documentation.
identified Individual J as a very ambitious individual that would'do anything to get ahead.
Implied his work should be given particular attention.
Reevaluate use of traveler turnover records.
Use of pencil versus ink.
Question regarding if the TTR is a quality record.
- 10. Hardware Concerns indicated he had no knowledge, but that. bis CE.ncerns are with
~ docum'entation control which was identified to during his exit interviews.
- 11. Summary indicated that in his view, Individual J's work deserves a hard look, and' the handling of documents was a merry go-round with high potential for lost documents.
He indicated that he had some harassing telephone calls but cannot connect them to the activities at Wolf Creek, indicated that his bringing concerns forward was not
- taliat6'ry on his part; all he is interested in is doing the job re right.
He indicated that he feels there are a lot of things wrong at Wolf Creek.
ibe interview w;: cor cluded at 12:40 p.m. on April 17, 1984, at which time F.e s s rs.
departed in their automobile for Kansas and 1 departe'5 in ey automobile TUT Omaha, Nebraska / Arlington, Texas.
My observations and conclusions regarding the interview of on April 17, 1534, are as follows:
1.
The KG&E representatives conducted the interview in a professional manner and displayed a real desire to get to the bottom of, concerns.
W. D. Johnsor. 2.
The informatior. presented by was esser.tially the sa 4 as giver, to me during a previous internew on February 22, 1954.
The inforr.ation in the hands of KG&E includes that presently in NRC's hands.
Additionally,,1 hey havtconducted interviews with many of the individuals identifiec by,.
The cor.te> t of these interviews are a.zilable to NRC for review.
3.
KG&E indicated that they would immediately initiate a task force review of all off concerns.
As a. starting point, they would review packages reviewed du~ ring the time of employment.
O G. L. Madsen, Reactor Inspector cc:
J. T. Collins R. P. Denise T. F. Westerman L
Dan g
0 U.s.Nucts An atoutAtoav cowwu'o
NRC ecmv 218 TELEPHONE OR VERBAL CONVERSATION RECORD g ff T8"Eg h
RC D3nD ONCOMING CALL O OUTGOING CALL O VISIT nasou c4tuuo orricunoontss rwout uvusta l cxrtuseo dm(cmoocv0 or,ieriaconess ewont suustn j exTrusic, nnson catuo T kh(le N(2c i_2 J k-8R-86c; 8 Iso CONVERSATION 90_>
(O d
SD-.s b er h
_D-u.Q M
c'3 4 E)2.-
eoA e E""dL esu.pe AMAaee4,_ Edh weAeo ab nud ea (3d..
5
,% cache,+4rJLdr
~
a wekat eh tuOd'&. Me> a.Uelgy.LL4&&
mas, woloEn 4._, eab # radars ~ h ped L wpee+ a#mo aLoede_ co c.ab e Lg;.C k.s o wco,
I TCe_. cake-d $ r d 6 620 L e_, u>as ah 4 60 L zsJch.
% ekasc_ u;M tuatGQae wETeffech the aidw;dl
.A-@ s c% 4 s % gh u>a hrm h bmj.
m as ~+,,% L& dmo a_ 6bcg4 cLek ~ %'s ge-u ; saauw wC & c W ka su L o..
A cuA6 was eacCL mN6 Les cufARJ-fu 52[b w Q e& ikk as % ech&, dce_ 4c> oedhu l
mcsbce.P h7Emon pccs.~.
o m 'La e dex w n I
d O ADVILE YTOF A
ACTION TAKEN.
~
ACTION REQUESTED INITI ALS DATIb s
U INITI A LS ACTION TAKEN DATE g
ALLEGAT]ON REV]EW CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-79 DATE OPENED 08/07/84 FACILITY NAME River Bend SUBJECT with
~ possible drinking problem SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Anonymous telecon
,8 NUMBER OF ALLEG.
1 ASSIGNED TO RPS-A CROSS REF. NO.
ACTION SCHEDULED Turn over to utility FIRST/LAST NAME J. Jaudon DATE ASSIGNED REPORT NUMBER 1st:
2nd:
Lst:
FTS NUMBER 8-728-8100 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT SORT CODE A
DATE CLOSED ACTION OFFICE RIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DEhAILS: J.R. Boardaan, NRC R]V, received an anonyrous telephone call on 8/7/84, at 12:32 p.m.
The caller, who said thc hr,wer ar employee at River Eend, allegrd that a vhv works the reactor area, is drunk most of the" time. He purportedly goes to The caller stated that he did not appear to know what was going on and that' was trying to replace l
experienced pipe welders with his drinking buddies? This allegation was turned over to Dedden (GSU) for investigation by telecon from E. Johnson on 8/7/84.
1 l)l9
u t e.~ F ALLEG AllON DAT A FORN.
L' ! w( i t H Lv.* 10'a c o'.". s so..
Iu e v,. i..:... on,,....,. o, RECtlVING CFFICE
- 1. recilitylles) Involved:
themet set mo.e esen s. e n f, o E tt AGrA 0 Y O
( 20 "Y T k eene..c.
we stNtac i-O I'~ d d d 4 f 9
- 2. Functional Areals) involved:
Icheck opp op ste boiteell Operatione onsite health and saf ety 2
construction offsite health and safety r
safeguards emergency preparednese other especifyl S.
lAIAli>lalel l II I IIIIII III I I II II1
- 3. Oescription:
<t""+'"'*'a' ll l l l l l l lIIl l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 IIIIIIIl l 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II l-l l-+ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIII
( gut,vys td Allegation:
~
ICma piste boni contractor employee security guard licensee employee news media NRC employee private citizen organization ispecityl 1
other tspecity) c MM DD YY
- 5. Date Allegation Received:
- 6. Name of Individual meet two initiets and is.t namet
-7r 0-6' N.
Receiving Allegation:
- 7. Of fice:
74 g
y ACTION OFFICE S. Action Office
Contact:
tr.,si two inti;ste and test name) 6((W re h S. FTS Telephone Number:
2
/
O d Open. If followup actionsite pendog or in progress Closed,if followup actions are completed MM DD YY
- 11. Date Closed; j
- 12. Remarks:
[l ll l l ll l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l ll (Lim.i to 50 che acterst i III!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 Off.co
- Yea, Number
- 13. Allegation Number:
y
ALLEGATION REVIEW C'ASE NUMBER 24-84-A-101 DATE OPENED 09/19/84 FACILITY NAME River Bend 50-458 50-459 SUBJECT Drugs SOURCE OF ALLEGATION NUMBER OF ALLEG.
1 ASSIGNED TO RPS "C" CROSS REF. NO.
ACTION SCHEDULED Provide to utility FIRST/LAST NAME J. Jaudon DATE ASSIGNED 09/19/84 REPORT NUMBER 1st:
2nd:
Lst:
FTS NUMBER 8-728-8100 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT SORT CODE C
DATE CLOSED ACTION OFFICE RIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS: Allegation, that there are others involved.
Description of allegation r.rcaided to GS!T by telephone call on S/39.'M.
I Dal i
WASHINGTON LnoAL FouNoArroN 8705 N STREET, N. W.
WAS HINGTON, 0. C. 2OO3 6 202-857-0240 October 23, 1984 Joseph Felton FOIA Office Rf.EDOM OF lidOhMAll0N United States Nucleaf 801 REQUES1 Regulatory Commission Fora > v'o)
Washington, D.C.
20555 I
/M Mb Re:
FOI Request
Dear Mr. Felton:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 USC B552 et seq.,
I hereby request the following documents:
(1) all documents, internal guidelines, regulations, policy manuals, or any written materials regarding or relating to agency procedure or policy for the detection and control of alcohol and illegal drug use by all persons engaged in the actual building or construction of nuclear reactors or facilities; (2) all such documents described above regarding er relating to agency procedure and policy for the detection and control or alcohol and illegal drug use by all persons engaged in the operating of nuclear reactors or facilities;
{3) all reports or written documents or disciplinary measures, personnel actions or investigations of persons engaged in the con-struction, operation, or maintenance of nuclear reactors or facilities.
I write on behalf of the Washington Legal Foundation, a non-r' public interest law firm with 85,000 members nationwide.
The puri of this request is to assist and facilitate the general public safety by learning the extent of drug or alcohol abuse in nuclear facilities, and to encourage that remedial measures be taken, if necessary.
Accordingly, we request a waiver of any and all fees that would be assessed for the researching and copying of the requested documents.
We expect that a prompt response within 10 days will be forth-coming.
If you have any questions about this FOI request, please feel free to call me at 857-0240.
Thank you for your attention and consideration.
Sincerely, Steven J.
Heath SJH:lv YYYh~h
~
C