ML20207Q074

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Drug & Alcohol Use at Nuclear Facilities.Document Listed on App C Available in Pdr.Documents Listed on App D Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 6)
ML20207Q074
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek, Cooper, Arkansas Nuclear, Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 01/16/1987
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Shawanna Heath
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Shared Package
ML20207Q075 List:
References
FOIA-84-827 NUDOCS 8701220067
Download: ML20207Q074 (5)


Text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGUt.ATORY CCMMISSION NRC FOIA EEQVf 57 %VBERi$s g F01A-84-827

,f,"'%r.,5.

RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF '~ h*"

tspoNsa Type d " "

INFORMATION ACT (FOlA) REQUEST DOCati Nuvsta s, or especsame lEQUtsTER Mr. Steven J. Heath PART l.-RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checked bonest No agency records subject to the request have been located.

No addetonal agency records subl ect to the request have been located.

Agency records subject to the request that are identifed in Appendix are already evadable for public mspection and copying in the NRC Public Document am, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC.

Agency records subject to the request that are identifed in Appendim . E A II are bemg made available for public inspection and copying in the NRC Public Doceent g Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washmgton, DC, in a folder under this FOIA number and requester name.

The nonpropnetary version of the proposa##st that you agreed to accept m a telephone conversaten with a mereber of my staff is non be.ng made avaiable for pubhc inspect on ano coying at the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC e in a folder under this FOIA number and requester name.

Enclosed is information on how you may obtam access to and the charges for copying records placed in the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington. DC.

Agency records subject to the request are er closed. Any applicable charge for copes of the records provided and payment procedu'es are noted in the comments section.

Records subiect to the request have been referred to another Federal agency 0es) for revew and direct response to you.

In view of NRC's response to this request, no further action is bemg taken on appealletter dated PART li.A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Certain informaton in the requested records is bemg withheld from pubhc disclosure pursuant to the FOIA enemptons desenbod in and for the reasons stated in Part II. sec-tons 8, C, and D. Any released portens of the documents for which only part of the record is bemg withheld are be ng made avadabie for public inspection and copyeg m the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street. N W., Washington, DC. in a folder under this FOIA number and requester name Comments Appendix C record is being released in its entirety. Appendix D records are being partially released.

The review of additional records subject to this request is currently underway. As soon as the review has been completed, we will communicate with you.

$ ** & 7 B70116 i HEATH 84-827 PDR SIG ~Rt. DiptCTom D vi N OF SANDmECORDS

/

Or - u A smdhf _

?[r NIC FORM 444 teert n rp 86)

FZEEDOM OF I!F*RMAYlON ACT RESP!NSE FOIA NUVBE*SI: F01A-84-827 oATE & 16 W PAkT !! B- APPLICABLE FOIA EXENtPil!N) o re neds subject to the request that are descnbed in the enclosed Appendices O are bemJ withheld in their entirety or in part under FOtA En mptions and for the reasons set forth below pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552f b) and 10 CFR 3.5f al of NRC Pegulations.

1. The withheld informaten is property classfied pursuant to Executive Order 12356 (EXEMPTION 11
2. The withheld mformation relates soleiv to the eternal personnel rules and pror.edures of NRC. IEXEMPTION 2) 3 The uthheld information is specificatly enempted from public disclosure by statute mdicated: (EXEMPTION 31 Secnon 141145 of the Atomic Energy Act which proh@ts the disclosure of Restncted Data or Formerty Restr : e3 Cata la2 U.S C. 21612165L Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act which prohituts the disclosure of Unclassdied Safeguards informaton (42 U.S C. 2167).
4. The wethheld mformation is a trade secret or commercial or financial mformation that is being withheld for the reasps? indicated IExEMPTION 41 The information is cons dered to be confidential buoness (propnetary) information.

The information is considered to be propnetary eformaton pursuar t to 10 CFR 2 730dd)(1).

The information was submatted and received in confidence from a foregn source pur suant to 10 CFR 2.790tdi 2

5. The withheld information consists of interagency or intraagency records that are not available through discovery dpg litigaten. Deciosure of predecisenal informat n would tend to ersh@t the open and frants enchange of ideas essential to the deliberative process. Where records a'e M!hheld m their enterety. the facts are inextncan etertweed with the predecisional mformaten. There also are no reasonably segregable 8 actual portens because the re8 ease of the facts would permit an mdirect mquery mto the predecitonal process of the egency.1 EXEMPTION 58
6. The withheld information as enempted from pubiac disclosure because its disclosure would result m a clearly unwarraeted invasion of personal privacy. IEXEMPTION 6;
7. The withheld information conssts of investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes and is be*g weeto for the reasonist moicated. (EXEMPTION 7t Disclosure would mterfere eth an enforcement proceeding because it could reveal the scope. direction, and focus of enforcement efforts. and thus could possioly allow them to tatie act>on to sheid potential wrongdoing or a violation of NRC requirements from enses* gators. ,ENf MPTION 7 tall Disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasen of personas privacy IEXEMPTION 7(C))

The informaten consists of names of individuals and other information the disclosure of which would reveal ide" ties cf cor4dential sources (EXEMPTION 7100 PART 11 C-DENylNG OFFICIALS Pursuant to 10 CFR 9 9 and or 915 of the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commiesen regulatons. it has been determined that the in@maten withheld is enempt from producten or disresse.

end that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons respons@e for the derwal are those offic.a s identified below as denymg officiais and the Ore: tor.

Divrson of Rules and Records. Office of Admmistraten, for any denials that may be appealed to the Esecutive Director for Operations 4oot DiNYING OFFICIAL TITLE. OF FICE RECORDS DEN!ED APPELLATE OFFICIAL NRC Region IV Portions of all records 5'c""* 'oc lobert D. Martin Regional Administrator in Appendix D X PART 18 D- APPEAL RIGHTS The denial by each denying official identified in Part II.C may be appealed to the Appellate Official identified in that section. Any such appeal must be m wnting and must be made within 30 days of receipt of this response. Appeals must be addressed as appropriate to the Esecutive Director for Operations or to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearfy state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision.

F;nc FonM ase IPset 2:

is asi U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FOlA RESPONSE CONTINUATION

RE: ;F0!A-84-827 y- ,

APPENDIX C RECORD MAINTAINED IN THE PDR UNDER THE AB0VE REQUEST NUMBER L 1. October 19, 1983 Conversation record, re: Alleged cocaine use at I

Wolf Creek Site (1 page) l I

e i

I t

l-I i

1 i

\

\

j 1

l l

l l

L

RE: F0IA-84-827 7

APPENDIX D RECORDS PARTIALLY WITHHELD

1. Undated- Allegation Review Form, re: Drug Use On Site (River Bend (2 pages) NOTE: Copy made from poor quality xerox copy
2. Undated Allegation Review, Allegation No. A-82-21, re: Drug Allegation (1 page)
3. July 26,1982 Report of Inquiry, re: Allegations of Suspected Drug Usage by two Licensed AP&L Employees, ROI: Q-4-82-0006 ,

with attached allegation closeout (2 pages) l

4. January 6, 1983 Report of Inquiry, re: Cooper Nuclear Station, Alleged On-Duty Intoxication, Report No. U4-83-001 (2 pages)
5. January 7, 1983 Letter to Nebraska Public Power District (C. L. Lessor) from John T. Collins (RIV), re: Transmitting information regarding allegations of intoxication (2 pages)
6. January 16, 1983 Allegation Review, re: Intoxication at Cooper (1 page) ,
7. January 20, 1983 Conversation Record between Leo Lessor and Jim Kelly, re:

Concerns about behavior and qualifications (1 page)

8. February 7,1983 Letter to John T. Collins from L. C. Lessor, re: Comment on five allegations (2 pages)
9. July 24, 1983 Letter to NRC Licensing Group from A Concerned Citizen of Grandbury, TX, re: Allegation of individual drinking (1 page)
10. August 5,1983 Allegation Review, re: Texas Utilities Personnel observed drinking with Personnel (1 page)
11. September 26, 1983 Memo for J. E. Gagliardo from D. M. Hunnicutt, re:

Anonymous letter from a concerned citizen, Case No. A-83-A-58 (1 page)

12. October 15, 1983 Allegation Review, re: Drugs on site (Wolf Creek)

(1 page)

13. October 18, 1983 Telephone or Verbal Conversation Record, re: Alleged cocaine use at Wolf Creek Site (1 page)
14. October 18, 1983 Allegation Review Form, re: Drugs on site (Wolf Creek)

(1 page)

15. February 15, 1984 Memo for Tom Westerman from Bill Johnson, re: Allegation at Wolf Creek concerning poor practices (3 pages)
16. March 8, 1984 Memo for W. Johnson from G. L. Madsen, re: Wolf Creek Allegation (4 pages)

h D-2

17. April 24, 1984 Memo for W. D. Johnson from G. L. Madsen, re: Interview on April 17,1984 (5 pages)
18. August 3, 1984 Telephone or Verbal Conversation Record, re: Allegation of Drug Above by Contractor Employee: Waterford (1 page)
19. August 7,1984 Allegation Review, re: Individual with possible drinking problem, Case No. 4-84-A-79 (1 page)
20. September 19, 1984 Allegation Data Form, re: Drugs (River Bend) (1 page)
21. September .19,1984 Allegation Review, re: Drugs (River Bend) (1 page) 1 i

i i

t

.