ML20198E870

Forwards ninety-three Drs Identified During Review Activities for Independent Corrective Action Verification Program.Three Drs Determined to Be Invalid Encl

ML20198E870
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	01/07/1998
From:	Schopfer D SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
9583-100, NUDOCS 9801090243
Download: ML20198E870 (151)

Text

, .. -. -- - .- - - . .-. -

Pu f a

l Sar geret & t- l undy '*

$0 non K. Schopter

. Vice President

~ 312 2646078 l

January 7,1998 Project No. 9583-100 Docket No. 50-423 -

. Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program 1):

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Docunent Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 I have enclosed the following ninety-three (93) discrepancy reports (DRs) identified dedag our review activities for the ICAVP. These DRs are being distributed in accordance with the Communiutions Protocol, PI-MP3-01.

1 DR No DR-MP3-0134 DR No DR-MP3-0768 DR No DR-MP3-0815 DR No DR-MP3-0189 DR No DR-MP3-0769 DR No DR-MP3-0816 DR No DR MP3-0332 DR No DR-MP3-0773 DR No DR-MP3-0817 DR No DR-MP3-0349 DR No DR-MP3-0776 DR No DR-MP3-0818 DR No DR-MP3-0435 DR No DR-MP3-0777 DR No DR-MP3-0819 DR No DR-MP3-0508 DR No DR-MP3-0778 DR No DR-MP3-0820 DR No DR-MP3-0598 DR No DR-MP3-0779 DR No DR-MP3-0823 DR No DR-MP3-0618 - DR No DR-MP3-0780 DR No DR-MP3-0824 DR No DR-MP3-0661 DR No DR-MP3-0781 DR No DR-MP3-0825 DR No DR-MP3-0698 - DR No DR-MP3-0782 DR No DR-MP3-0828 DR No DR-MP3-0699 DR No DR-MP3-0784 DR No DR-MP3-0831 DR No DR-MP3-0703 UR No DR-MP3-0785 DR No DR-MP3-0832 DR No DR-MP3-0712 DR No DR-MP3-0788 DR No DR-MP3-0833 DR No DR-MP3-0714 DR No DR-MP3-0789 DR No DR-MP3-0339 l l

DR No DR-MP3-0725 DR No DR-MP3-0790 DR No DR-MP3-0835 m DR No DR-MP3-0728 DR No DP-MP3-0791 DR No DR-MP3-0836 I

. DR No DR-MP3-0733 DR No DR-MP3-0793 - DR No DR-MP3-0837 _! (')U , f !;

i DR No DR-MP3-0735 DR No DR-MP3-0794' DR No DR-MP3-0838 DR No DR-MP3-0743 DR No DR-MP3-0797 DR No DR-MP3-0843

- DR No DR-MP3-0745 DR No DR-MP3-0799 DR No DR-MP3-0845 DR No DR-MP3-0747' DR No DR-MP3-0800 DR No DR-MP3-0846 1 9001090243 900107i PDR P ADGCK 05000423 l l '

PDR h'*** ' h.h [' ' ,' )

N v A' '

55' E'ast Venroe Street . (micago, IL S0603-5780 USA 312-2t&2000 l I

,. e United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission January 7,1998 Document Control Desk Project No. 9583-100 Page 2 DR No DR-MP3-0748 DR No DR-MP3-0801 DR No DR-MP3-0847 DR No DR-MP3-0749 DP No DR-MP3-0802 DR No DR-MP3-0848 DR No DR-MP?-0751 DR No DR-MP3-0804 DR No DR-MP3-0849 DR No DR-MP3-0752 DR No DR-MP3-0805 DR No DR-MP3-0858 DR No DR-MP3-0755 DR No DR-MP3-0805 DR No DR-MP3-0862 DR No DR-MP3-0761 DR No DR-MP3-0807 DR No DR-MP3-0864 DR No DR-MP3-0763 DR No DR MP3-0808 DR No DR-MP3-0884 DR No DR MP3-0764 DR No DR MP3-0810 DR No DR-MP3-0902 DR No DR-MP3-0765 DR No DR-MP3-0811 DR No DR-MP3-0903 DR No DR-MP3-0766 DR No DR-MP3-0513 DR No DR-MP3 0906 Northeast Utilities, please note that we were unable to include two DRs Nos -0763 and -0789 in today's e-mail.

! :. ave also enclosed the following three (3 DRs that has been determined invalid, No action is required from Northeast Utilities for this DRs. The basis for its invalid determination is included on the document.

DR No, DR-MP3-0757 DR No. DR-MP3-086I DR No. DR-MP3-0937 Please direct any questions to me at (312) 269-6078.

Yours very truly, t

J

%7 -

D. K. Sc'hopfer ) )

Vice President and ICAVP Manager l DKS:spr Enclosures Copics:

E. Imbro (1/l) Deputy Director, ICAVP Oversight T. Concannon (1/l) Nuclear Energy Advisory Council J. Fougere (1/1) NU mN.avpwwn98WO1074&w i

l DR No. Di .MP3 0134 -.

Northeast utsties ICAVP.

umetone unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revis or.e,: system DRvAuD Rev ewelement: syshmoesion Discipane: Elecincel Design O v.

Disorspency Type: Drowing @ No SystenWProcese: SWP NRC SigntAcencelevel: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Putdished:

DN: D!screpancy between s': hematic drawings and FSAR figure 7.3 (typical test circuits).

4 t=- - ~ The lo94 c diagrams (LSK 2711E Rev. 9 & 11L Rev. 9 and LSK-i 91G Rev.11,70 Rev. 9 & 7E Rev. 9) and schematic dia9 rams (ESK-6AAF Rev. 9, AAG Rev.10, AAH Rev. 8, AAJ Rev. 9, AAK Rev. 9, AAL Rev.8, AAM Rev. 9, and AAN Rev. 8) indicate that a 'No No' Equipment test circuit is part of the circuits for 3SWP*MOV50A & B,54A, B, C, & D, and 71 A & B. FSAR sodion 716.2.2.5 and figure 7.3 4 provides typical detalis for the

'No No" test circuit in both 120 Vac and 125 Vdc circuit applications. The typical details in FSAR figure 7.3-4 Indicates that a varistor is used in 125 Vdc applications and does not Indicate the use of a varistor in 120 Vac applications. These schematics (listed abova) Indicate the use of a varistor in 120 Vac applications.

Review vesc invand Needed Date 12/$as7 Inlitator Morton. R. G O O <

2/ ins 7 VT Leed: Nort, Anthnny A G O O O $2/2ss7 VT Mgr achopfer DnnK G O

• IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K @ Q Q 12/31 S 7 Date:

INVALID:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

Previously identeRed toy Nu? U Yes @ No Non Discrepent Condition?Q Yee @ No P+Penans70 va @ No ~ % u e tO va @ No nevww Not E ,^ Needed Date R.

VT Lead: Nort. Anthony A O G

- vT ugr: schopsar. Don K O O G 1RC Chmn: singh, Anand K Dele:

SL Commente 9 T

1. ICAVP M No. DRW34189

< Northeast Utuities minietorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report j neve waroup: system onvAuD noview element: system Design  ;

O ves l DLmpancy Type: tJoensine Documerd g g, : a s, r -  : swr NnC Signiacance level: 4 Dele faxed to NU:

Date Puhashed.

oteorepouy FSAR Section 9.2.i.2 is not consident with P&lO EM-1330 l osecreption: While dispositioning Requirement SWP-0073, the following l discrepancy was noted:

i FSAR Section 9.2.1.2 [Page 9.2 5) states "Whenever an emergency generator starts, sufficient service water is supplied to the emergency generator en0ine coolers by the automatic opening of air-operated valves located in the discharge lines of each emergency generator engine cooler,"

The valves referred to here are SSWP*AOV39A & B. Per the P&lD [EM133D], and the associated lo0ics and schematics, the valves open automatically only on receipt of LOP, SIS, or CDA si0nal. Any other time the diesels are started, e.g. for surveillance testin0 or any manual starts, operator action is requ' red to open the service water valves in order to provide '

cooling water to the coolers in question. Therc is no interlock bewteen the valves and the en0i ne to ensure that they are open any time the diesels are running. Therefore the FSAR requirement is not fulfilled.

Since the diesels are already declared inoperable durin0 surveillance testing, and no other conditions for the diesels to start without cooling waterwere identified as part of this review, no operability issue was raised.

[UIR 54 identified a similar concem related to an Appendix R fire in the cable spreading /conhol room requiring manual action to dump the air fmm the AOV diaphragms in order to start the diesels; the UIR also identified that requirement as being in conflict with the FSAR.]

noview veed invend usemed Det.

Initiater: Tenwinhet,J L 9 O O 52tiar v n eed: Nul, Ansiony A O O O 12/1we7 vimen schepw, Don K O O O 12t23se7 inC Chmn: sergh, Anand K O O O 12rsiro7 Date:

m Auo:

Date:

nascunow.

Tien ";idone0Aed by Nu? Qvos @ No pien Dlocrepent Conehon?U Yes (G) No neestumenpeamne70 ve @ wo munresoeved70 von @ wo nm

~"

Printed e>7/se 60-242 AM Page 1 or 2

m m. m e se se Northeast utsue. ICAVP Mastorw Unit 3 D60crepancy Report huisson T==wai,J.L VTLead: Not Aeony A 0 g.

VT Egr: schepeer, Don K O O mc ce==: sm. Annd K O O

Date:

SL Comments:

b Printed 1/1/9610'25:00 AM Page 2 of 2

4 Netheast UWWee ICAVP DR h DR*84888 mistaw unit 3 - Discrepancy Report novieweroep: syneem envaun noview sinnene: ayeesm Deelen oissipane: timetalomen g y, oneerspeney Type: Diesens g g, ayeessWPresses: N/A leec aloniReshoe novel:4 ones FAliedas tal:

ones pubeshed:

oteerepeney: Schematic and wiring drawing discrepancies for mair*. *.ontrol boards neeerspelen: Vcrious discrepencies between wirino drawings and the correspondine schematic drawin0s as insted below:

1) Schematic diagram (ESK4DD Rev.14) for 3SWPWOV24A indicates point 11 of conted 11 12 of lamp test circuit devios SA.

SCESA17, conneds to the side of the red indicating light and point 12 connects to the side of the green indicating light. The corresponding wiring diagram, EE 3AAV Rev. 4, indicates that this contact connedion is reversed.

2) Schematic diagram (ESK-5CN Rev.13) for 3RSS*P1 A indicates point 6 of contact G5, from device 3D-3CESA18 (lamp test circuit) is connected to the amber light and poird 5 (of the same conted) is connected to the red light. The corresponding wiring diagram (EE SADH Rev. 5) indicates that the conted is reversed, i.e., point 6 is connscled to the red light and point 5 is connected to the amberli0ht.

3) Schematic diagram (ESK4LQ Rev. 7) for 3RSSWV88388 I ind6 cates point 6C of contact 6 from 33 3SILWV88128 is conneded to permissive contads from valves 3RHSWV8702A, B, & C. This schematic also indicates that point 6 of contact 6 is connected to push-button 1-3RSSNV88388. The corresponding wirin0 deaGram (EE-0FQ Rev.10) ind6 cates that the connection of contad 6 lei reversed

4) Wiring diagram EE 3QW Rev. 7 Indicates the Red /Bik condur. tor (wire code C03) of cable SCES20C020 is terminated at terminal point 4-2. The opposite end of the cable is shown on wiring diagram EE-9EY Rev.11 (compt. 5F) which indicates that wire code CO3 of cable SCES20C020 is a Wht/Sik conducor.

(Ref. Schematic diagram ESK4RR Rev. 7 - 36WP*P28).-

5) Schematie diagram (ESK4AAW Rev.15) for 38WPWOV102C indicates the wire codes at terminal points DOS, DD10, and DD7 to be 802,805. & SC1, respedively. The corresponding wHnD diagram EE-88F Rev.16 (4 Ky compt, sect.18) ind6 cates the wire codes to be S01, S06, & SC2, roepedively.

6) Wiring diagram EE-3TP Rev.12 indicates wire code at termir.31 point AA-2 as *PT1* (cable number 3OSS8PC351).

Schematic diagram (ESK-SDH Rev.11) for SQSS*P3B indicates the wire code to be "PTO*.

'M MArinn cuantam FFAFM Dau in traf echammale sumaram F9X u

. Printed 1R/9s 10'2s.36 AM ' Paes 1 or 2

o- ICAVP M No. MW34332 mast utinties Milistone unit 3 : Discrepancy Report l

7KQ Rev. 4) mdicates cable 38WPNOC600 is routed from panel 3CES*TS-M810 to " Detail A* on wiring diagram E2-12AC, for pressure switch 3SWP*P327A. Winng diagram EE-12AC Rev.

5 does not show this pressure switch or

• Detail A*. Similar for pressure switch 38WP*PS278 (EC 3DQ Rev.11 & ESK 7KQ Rev.4).

8) Wiring diagrams EE 3AED Rev. 5 and EE-3ADG Rev. 8 Iderdifies a cable as 3CES20C136, this same cable is identified as 3CES20C130 on wiring diagram EE 3DR. (Ref. Schematic diagrams ESK4AAA Rev. 7 and ESK 6AAF Rev. 9).

Review Valid inveed Needed Date O 12/1M7 inteistor: Morton, R. O O VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O O O i/1"7 VT Mgr: Schepfer, Don K O O O 12/23s7 O O i2/ sis 7 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K O Date:

INVAUD:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

Pr.vlously idenused W NU7 O Yee @ No NonDiecrepentCondloon?Q Yes (9) No n iumenPenmaerO Y= @ N. m unroe*.d7O Yee @ No ne*w Aeoeptable Not Acceptolde Needed Date m.g YT Lead: Nort, Anthony A VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K O O IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:

st Commente:

e Pnnled 1/1/9810:25A0 AM Page 2 of 2

ICAVP. DR No. DR4PM349 Northeast umme.

Mastone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report j Review erog: system DRvAun Review eaemem: sysism Design  % j Diecipane: Mechenlosi Desi'" l O vee Desoropency Type: consonard Deen gg l s,_ :Rss j NRC signiacense level: 3 Does faxed to NU:

Date Pubnehed:

Deserepency: Specs SP-ME 784 is inconsistent with PCDR 3 93-015 Deecripmen: Specification SP-ME 784 through Revision 2 only applies to valves 3RSSWOV23A,B,C,D, as they were replaced via PDCR 3-93-015. However, the specification is misleading because it contains valve data sheets for valves 3RSSWOV20A,B,C D, 3RSSWOV23A,B,C,D, and SQSSWOV34A,B, but PDCR 3 '- 015 addresses only the replacement of valves 3RSSWOV23A,B,C,0. No design change packages are identified to implement the replacement of valves 3RSSWOV20A,B,C,D and SQSSWOV34A,B as defined in specification SP ME 784.

The design specifications SP M6784 through Revision 2 and 2362.200164 through Addendum 1 for valves 3RSSWOV23A,B,C,0 overlap each other but contain conflicting data.

i Specificationc SP-ME 784, the more recent of the two specifications, is for the replacement of Pratt Butterfly Valves only, and not the associated motor operators.

l

! Specification 2362.200-164, the eariier specification, identifies the design requirements for both the butterfly valves and their associated motor operators. As such, this specification provides synergistic r3quirements such as valve stroke time, motor.

operator hammer biow feature, and equipment qualification with

! respect to electrical components, and other motor operator features. The seismic loading of the motor operator is addressed in PDCR 3-93 015.

l Specification SP-ME 784 doe's not cross reference specification 2362.200164 or any other motor operator specification.

l Therefore, specifications SP-ME-784 and 2362.200164 cannot i be reconciled to fully define the design and purformance requirements for valves 3RSSWOV23A,B,C,D, relative to stroke l

l time, equipment qualification, and operator hammer blow feature.

' Review Vaud Invalid Neeeed Date O O 12tisS7

(

Initissor: Feingold, D. J. O l VT Leed: Nort, AmhanyA Q Q Q 12/1847 O 12i2sier VT Mgr: schopter, Don K Q O O 2rsiro7 etc Chmn: singh, Anand K O O Dese:

INVAUD:

Date:

Pnnled 1mB81026:10 AM Page 1 or 2

m.- - _ m a... a _...a_ ., ...~..u.,m 4.._ m.._ 4.- a. 2.+. . .

i

./-

" Nwtheast Umu.e ICAVP Dm.DN34W Mis 6 stone Unit 3 Discrepancy Repoet l RESOLUTION

• 7.af: _' ', idensAed by NUr U Yes (9) No NonPAeropentCondulentU Yes (9) No ReemmeaPenmerO m @m - urse*earO m @m m

intister. (none)

VT Leed: Nort, Ardhony A VT Mgri Schopfer, Don K O o MC Chmn: Singh, Anand K g oste:

SL Comments:

Printed 1R/9610.25.14 AM Page 2 of 2

1 Northeast UWWes BCAVP M No.DR M S M umstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Repoft moview arsup: symem DaVauD moview moment: sydem Design N MechereneiDesi'"

O vee Diesrepency Type: Uoensing Documort gg s,_ _ . . :sWP NRC SignWeenee immi: 4 Date Faxed to NU:

Date Pumashed:

Desempancy: incorted and Missing Data from SWP Design Basis Summary ~

Doc!wnent Deseription:

In dispositioning requirements SWP-0111 through' 0116, it was noted that the SWP DBSD lists the heat load for the MCC and -

RCA A/C Units as 587,000 btu /hr, but does not list the corresponding SW flow rate, which should be 55 Opm.

The SWP DBSD lists the SW flow rate for the Containment Recirc Spray HXs as 5,900 gpm, but lists the heat load inconectly as 3* 6,000 btu /hr, when it should be 318,000,000 blu/hr, Both of the above are considered to be editorial in nature, as the calculation [904691065 M3] referenced in the DBSD has the correct values contained therein.

Review vond invend Needed Due Initialer: Tendnhol, J. L G O O 12/22 s7 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A G O O 12/20s7 )

VT Mgr: Schogder, Den K Q Q 12/23/97 O 12isiro7 ptC Chmn: singh, Anand K G Date:

mvAuD:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

7. . . ?;identleed by Nu? U vos @ No Non Dioereped Condition?U vos @ No w%PenenetO va @ No ~%un.sv.drO va @ No  ;

n.wiew AccepteWe Not A - , Needed Date mg VT Lead

Nort, Anthony A VT Mgr: Sc*mpfer, Don K  !

WIC Chan: skgh, Anand K I

Date:

sL comraente:

Printed 1/r/9810'26AS AM Pege 1 or 1 1

l Northeast Utilities ICAVP M

• M*88 L

Millstorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Syelem DRVAUD Revtew element: Moekemon Desip Diecipens: Mechaniosi Design O vos Deserepancy Type: Insteestlar. Renuiremente g Si T : =! OS8 NRC Signiaeance level: 3 Date faxed to NU:

Deee Puhushed: i F-  ; :6 Discrepency with resped to PDCR MP3-90106, SQSS*AOV27/28 Engaging Key Removal.

Descripesen: The affeded vendor manual or equivalent is not revised by the des 8gn change docu'nent.

!t appears that a page of the vendor manualis modified by the design change as shown in the design document. However, no change to the Vendor manual is specified by the design document, Review Valid Imrelid Needed Date milietor: Feingold, D. J. a 0 12rtas7 VT Leed: Nerl, Ardhony A -

Q 12/1as7 VT Mgr: Schopft1, Don K G O O 12/23s7 12/31/97 IRC Chmn: Singh, AnerJ K Q Q Date:

PNALID:

Dele:

REtoLUnoN.

.t. :--?;idoneleed by NU? Q vos @ No NonDiorrepentCondalon?Q vos @ No tw% PendingtO v.s @ N. = a % unr oewd7 O vos @ No i Revtow ,

A- Not . -: ; Date i mg VT Leed: Kwl, Ardhony A I VT Mar: Schopfer, Don K 1RC Chmn: & sigh, Anand K O O O Date:

SL Conenente: I l

Printed 1/7416102726 AM Pope 1 of 1

i ICAVP DR No DR MP3-0696 )

Norttwast Utstles temeterm unit 3 Discrepancy Report 4

neview oreup: system DRVAun Review siement: -1 Design Diecipiene: Mechanical Deel'"

O Ya Deseropency Type: Instedellen i.y.- . ,

gg s,_ .  : swr NRC signtAcense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Pubashed:

E. + PDCR MP3-91056 Did Not Adequately Address Breached Banier nor Pump Assembly Requirements E -- . ^ PDCR MP3-91-056 was initiated to change the shaft and coupling materials on 3SWP*PIC from the original Monel 400 to Nitronic 50 for improved resistance to corrosion, With respect to removal and reinstallation of pump intemal parts, no procedures were referenced to control this work. Drawings .

referenced in the package were not included with the package, and are designated in GRITS as void, with later drawing revisions noted for each, and irxlicating that they are not available on aperture cards, it should be noted that even though this PDCR was generated, no closoout documentation was included with the PDCR, and it therefore cannot be determined whether or not these activities actually took place, moview vand invoud Needed M inlaisten Tonwinkel, J. L, 9 O O 12/22is7 vT Lead: Nwt, Ameny ^ O O O =7 vr Men sehe,w, Den x 0 0 0 im7

$2 raiser IRC Clunn: Singh, Anand K O O Date:

mAuD:

Dele:

nasoumoN.

Previously identined by NUF U Yee @ No Non D6screpent Condaion?O Yes @ No

-PonenetO m @ No - unroe m edt O m @ No noview Wh Not Wh Needed Dele vT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O O vT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K 1RC Chan: Sirigh, Anand K O O

• Date:

sL Comments:

r

[

l- Pfinted 117/9610-26.02 AM Page1 of 1 1

i

m et u m mes MVP DR No. DRM 8418 - ,

. umetorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report nevenwesemp: system onvaun neviewsannsat: system Desip ,,,,, , ,,,,,_

sessipene: eassmoelossip DhapaneyTnd ceinutseen O vee (e) No -

syeeuweveense:oax smc esensneense twen:3 o,,, pag.g i, w: 1 Dene puhitehee:

Dimerspener: Diesel Generator Differential Relaying (*8a% 421CA) neeertpeten: Calculation 421CA sets the General Electric Type PVD differential relays that are used to deted a short circuit in each emergency deseel generator and its connections to the aseociated Class 1E 4.16 kV bus.

i The outrord drawn from the main circuit of the go..crator by the power current transformers is calculated on page 3 of the coloulation and included in the current drawn from the main circuit that will appear as falso differential cunent. However, power current transformers are connected in series with the main generator leads and draw no cutterd from the main circuit. They do introduce additional volta 0e drop in the main circuR, which does not affect the differential relays. Therefore, the falso differential outront from the exoMation system is about 9 amperes, not 22 amperos as shown in the calculation.

The minimum output voltage of the diesel Generator used to calculate the cunerW drawn by the excitation transformer assumes that the generator is rated 4000 volts. However, the generator is adually rated 4160 volts. (4000 volts is the normal g rating of motors used on a 4100 volt syster,1 The standana voltage for generators on the same system is 4160 volts.) This l

further reduces the falso differeMiel current and increases the margin to prevent faiso relay operation. Moreover, cxmtrolled rectifier loads, such as the excNation system, normally have a constant current rather than a constant kVA characteristic. This will reduce the cummt drawn by the exokation system even more.

While it is noosesary to provide margin to provert false relay operation, it IW ottained at the ocet of reducing the sensitivity of the relay to dated faults within the zone that is protected by the reley. The available short circuit commt for en intamal generator fault depends on its location. The available fault currerW near the j neutral and of the generator is limhed. W ' ii-- 'a the sensMlvity of the differential relay allows more of the generator w6ndin0 to be protected a0ainst intomal short circuits; increasing the margin a0ainst fales relay operation requires allowmg some possible short circuits within de relay zone to be undstedable by the foisy. The proper setting of the relay requires balancing both of  ;

these considerations This redudion in the falso differential current presents'en  !

opportunity to inenmase the sensitivity of the differential protection. The calculated minimum settine of the main fault detoding 87L element is 58.5 volts compared to an adual relay ,

setting of 140 volts. Therefore, the setting can be reduced while -!

. ,_ x:."::;:n =A,1:r;en::::;r gg 1

1

NorthGast utstie. ICAVP M No. MMM18 Mastorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report of the generator. This w m+r;important since the grouM fault relaying onh un0 rounds the generator neutral. Operation with the neutral unprounded can result in severe transierd -

overvoltages, which can damage the generator and other equipment that is contweted to the generators.

Review Vend bwebd Needed Date 12r2397 bduster: eassehe,G.wumm Q g VT Lead: Neri, Anthony A O O 12/2 m 7 VT Mer: schopfer, Den K g Q 12/2M7 wic Chmn: singh, Anand K Q Q Q 1598 Date: 12/11/07 mvAuo:

Date:

ftESoufTir3N:

NT:P; hientined try Nu? O Yee @) No NonDiscrepentCoMh?Q Yes (9) No W%Pending?O v.e @ No ~%unreceived?O vos @ do Review m,g Acceptekee W- , Needed Date VT Lead: Neri, Anthony A VT Mgr: schopfer DenK IRC Chan: Singh, Anand K O -

Date:

SL Commente:

Prmied if7/9610:2e:35 AM PeGe 2 or 2

I-

)

l

, Northead UtSties ICAVP DR No DRMM41 j i

M*eterm unit 3 Discrepancy Report- l newtow even,: system DRvAuo l m seenme syntem W ,,,,,73,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, l D6ecipano: FlectHoelDesign .

O yes Deserepeney Type: catedmen g g, t _ systerwreceens: Dax NRC Nenlacence level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Puheshed:

1 -- . 4. First Level UndervoNage Relay Setting (Calculation NL-040) i Desadp#en: Calculation NL-040 determines the setting of the first level tindervoMage relays. These relays detect the complete loss of power to a bus. (Calculation NL-042 riotermines the setting of the ,

second level undervoMage relays inat respond to sustained low -

bus voMage. See DR-MP3-0542.)

The first level undervolte9e relays operate with a 1.8 second time delay, while the bus overcurrent relays take about 1.7 seconds to clear a line to line facM. The margin of 0.1 second is short, and may result in a loss of coordination between the two relays. A margin of 0.3 second is alinwed for coordir,ating .

overcurrent relays at Millstone 3, which prov! des margin to ensure that the relays operate as intended. A longer time delay setting of relay 62V would provide greater assurance that the main circuit breaker has had a chance to clear the bus f ault and lock out the food from the RSST, thus preventing exposing the RSST source to a faut. Therefoes, a coordination margin of 0.3 second is appropriate bere, also The calculation cNes infonnation from General Electric on the characteristics of Type NGV undervoNage relays. However, this information is contained in an unverified telephone memorandum. According to the telephone memorandum, General Electric was to follow up the telephone conversation with a letter. The letter is not included in the calculation.

The calculation includes a description of the closing of the feed from the RSST on undervoltage. No reference for this is given.

Both Calculation NL-040 and Calculation 42008 set time delay relay 62P. While the proposed setting is the same in both calculations, any given relay should be set in only one j calculat'on to ensure consigancy, moview vend invand Needed Date inteleter: siselho, G. Wlaam O O O 12/23nri VT Leed: Nort, Andhany A Q O i2/23/97

- 12/23,o7 VT Merr: schepeer, Den K O O WIC Chmn: singh, Anand K = 12/31/97 Date:

DNAUD:

Date

MEsOLUTKIN

- . m

. .. y a. r T v- rei m -r

- e -- - or T v- cat m PHnted 1/7/9s 16.29,o7 AM Page 1 or 2

)

< Northeast Ush ICAVP M h Mws4881  !

M**'" ure s Discrepancy Report l

-r-- - - +- . _ .

m.**n %tO v @* m u,,, dr o v @ u.

m M tie.ded M l initiator: (none)

YT Land: Nerl, Arewny A O O O YT Ingr: Schapler, Don K O O O IRC Chmn: 8% Anand K b

Date:

$L Comments:

l l

1 i

Printedim91110.29-11 AM Page 2 of :'

l, i

. _ _ , . . ~ , . . - . _

k Northeast UtiHties ICAVP DR No. OlWP3494

• r Minatorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report nev6ew erase: syeesm omVAuo newtow moment: speesm Deelyi ,%_

Olocipane: Electrical Design Ow oteerspency Type: component Date gg syneemoveeeee: DGX NRC Signiacense level: 4 Dade faxed to kJ:

Does Pubsehod Discrepancy: Vendor Drawings and NU Database Discrepancies involving Motors Descripakm:

A. Vendor Drawlags, Plant Desi0n Data System (PDDS), and Production Maintenance Management System (PMMS)

1. The checklists do not provk.a a requirement that the motors' equipment numbers agree amorY the desi0n documents, however, conflicting equipment nun.5ers could result in selecting the wrono data for a motor. The service descriptions of the -

following pumps d!sagrees between the Specification 2447.300 241 (Rev. 2), vendor drawings, PDDS, and PMMS, and the one line diagram as shown below (vendor drawin0s are all prefixed with 2447.300-241):

Description Vendor One Line Spec. PMMS PDOS Pre-lube Pump X Prelube & Filter Pump -000 Lube Oil Filter Pump -169,-004 EE-1EH X X Prelube Oil and Filter Pump X X Lube Oil D'rculating Pump X Preiube & LO. Filter Pp 107 Descrirtion Vendor One Line Spec. PMMS '

PDDS Jacket Keep Warm Pump X Water Jacket Circulating Pu X X Standby Jacket CcN Pu 169,-004 EE-iF.H X ,

Jacket Water Pump X  !

X . ,

Jacket Water Sys. Pu. -006 l i

Note: The revision used for the above doo>ments are Rev. 4 for EE-1EH. Rev. G for-009, Rev. C for-169, Rev. F for-004, and Rev. A for-107.

l The documents need to be revised to reflect consistent equipment descriptions.

2. Tho equipment numbers of the following pumps disagrees between the vendor drawings, PDDS, and PMMS, and the one L --

. un. ,u = = . w t m w ru z.rv etc a .= ar. in r.r r.vart Printed 1/ Mis 10346 AM Page 1 or 4

Northoset UWWee ICAVP M No. MM6898 Milletone unit 3 Discrepancy Report wPh 2447.300-241):

i Rocker Arm Prelube Pu Vendor One Une PMMS PDDS SEGOP2AiB -000-3EGOPIA/B 100,-004 EE 1EH X X Blandby Jacket Coolant Pu Vendor One une PMMS PDOS 3EGSP2MB 160,-004 EE-1EH - X X 3EGS-P1A/B -006 Lube Oil Filter Pump Vendor One Line PMMS PDDS 3EGOPIA/B 000 SEGOP4A/B 160,-004 EE 1EH X X 3EGOW1A/B (mdor) X X 3EGOW4A/S (mdor) X Note: The revision used for the above documents ase Rev. 4 for EE 1EH, Rev. G for 000, Rev. C for 160, Rev. F for-004, and Rev. J for -006.

The documents need to be revised to reflect consistent equipment numbering.

3. The Addendum 3 motor data sheet for 3EGFP1 A, i 3EGPP1B,3EGFPIC, and 3EGFPID has data which is not

too same as the data on the Addendum 2 motor data sheet in Specification 2441.200-043 (8tev. 0). Plant Desion Data System (PDDS) and Produdion Maintenance Mana0ement System l- (PMMS) refied the efficiency (0.806), speed (3500 rpm), full load (3.8) and locked rotor (25) current data in Addendum 2, but PDOS reflects the power fador (0.015) of Addendum 3. Vendor

, Drawing 2441.200-043-001F reflects the Addendum 3 data l

(Frame 210HP,3440 RPM), and Vendor Drawing 2441.200-043-  !

003B reflects the Addendum 2 data (Frame 180HP,3550 RPM, '

fullload currord of 3.8 amps, locked rotor current of 25 amps). A l review of GRITS shows both drawings as adive and wMh no outstandin0 dian0e documents which wouk1 affect the moter data shown on the drawin0s. It cannot be ascertained if the test data in Calculatism M3-SP EE-011 (Rev.1) is from the Addeadum 2 motor or the AcV.sendum 3 motor because the test data is si0nificantly lower (2.5 to 2.0 amps full load current and 36.8 to 42.3 amps locked rotor current for 3EGFP1 A, and 2.7 to 3.6 amps full load current and 36.2 to 43.2 amps locked rotor cument for SEGF*P18). PDDS and PMMS should be revised to {

j reflect the data of the installed motor, and the test data shown in Calculation MS SP-EE-011 should be reconciled with the vendor's data shown in Specification 2447.200-043.

4. The speed is shown on Vendor Drawing 2441.300-241 107A as 1150 rpm for 3EGOP4A and 3EGOP48i This does not aoise with the W shown in Scect'ication 2441.300-241 (Rev.

PmtedimOS10-29:51 AM Pese 2 or 4 i

P Northeast utsties ICAVP DR lb. DR4P3498 A Mmetone unit 3: Discrepancy Report l

2), Plerd Desi0n Data System (PDDS), and Produdion -

Maintenance '?ng+Te;; System (PMM8) which is 1160 rpm.

I l

B. Produdion Maintee,arn Maria 0ement System (PMMS) l

1. For the following pump motors, Produdiori Maintenance i Mana0ement System (PMMS) has three empecity cate0ories i and values for two empecity attributes: l 3EGFW2A/B: AFL u 18; ALR = 0; Amps = 2 3EG811A/B: AFL = 1.4; ALR = 9.2; Amps = 0.75 3EGON1A/B: AFL = 10.3; ALR = 63.5; Amps = 7.5 Comparing the values in PMMS with other documents, "AFL"  ;

and "ALR* represent full load and locked rotor currord, respedively, it appears that " Amps" represents the horsepower.  ;

In addition, horsepower is shown as zero for 3EGSW1 A,  !

3EG811B,3EGOW1 A, and 3EGOW18. . " Amps" and

" horsepower" should be revised to reflect tho actual motor attributes and values. Nme that the PMMS sheets for the ,

corresponding pumps appears to have the appropriate data  !

entries for these attributes.

2. Produdion Maintenance ManagemerW Gystem (PMMS) l shows the following multiple motor equipment numbers and i equipment descriptions for the same dr%n equipment: Prelube s Oil and Filter Pump (3 EGO *P4A art. '4GO*P48), Lube Oil Filter Pump Motor (3 EGO'M1 A arv: MGOW1B), and Prelube Oil and Filter Pump Motor (MGOWA and 3EGOW4B). PMMS should be revised to reflect the appropriate equipment number and description.

3. Tiur service fador for 3 EGO *PI A and 3 EGO *PIB is shown as 1.0 in Specification 2447.300 241 (Rev. 2) Pape 215 and sa 1.15 on vendor Drawing 2447.300 241 111 A. The appropriate document should be revised to reflect the adual service fador of the motor.

Moview

% dirt inveNd Needed Date infuster: Kandet.D.J. G O 1 /$**7 VT Leed: Nerl. Ardheny A Q 12/16.97 VT Mer: schopfer, Den K G O O 12r23e7 MC Chmn: singh. Anand K Q Q Q 12/31 S 7 Dele:

INWALP.

Date:

IWsOLUTloN:

7. . . ";idonessed by Nu? Q Yes . @ Ne kmOtsesepentCondIIIen?Q Yes @ No Printed 1/r/ss 10:29:53 AM Pe08 3 or 4

-g 7 -v,we -

--d=

Northeast Udlities BCAVP. M No. M&SMH Mmetone unit 3 Discrepancy Report -

ResehmonPnsaatO vos @ No Resehmenuaressemento vos @ No Review We Not Acceptekee Needed Date m g)

VTlass: Nort, Antnany A D D D VT tegri Solepser, Den K O O O 5tC Claurt 8% Anand K Date:

O  !

St.Commente:

ca s

Prwted 1/7/9610:29:55 AM Paes 4 of 4 I

d

" Nwtheast UWWes K:AVP .DR No. DR MP34m ,

museum unit 3. Discrepancy Report newesw aroup: evenom Onvaun ,

newesw elemees: ayonem ossian Olseipens: Eiseertool osel'"

Ow Deserspency Type: cervennent osas syseenweresees: pox g g, 1500 tay=aha ==== level: 4 Date PAXed to NU:

Datepuhtshed.

DiesrepensF: Calculation Desi0n input Discrepancies involving Motors Damerip8 lea: 1 Calculation SP-MS-EE-011 (Rev.1) provides test values for

- the emergency diesel generator motors, it is expeded that there would be some variation t,etwoon the tested data and the vendor supplied data, for even in Calculation SP-M3-EE-011 the values recorded in the ihree phases are different. However, for 3EGOP4A and 3EGOP48, the full load cunent values shor.'n in Calculation SP-MS-EE.011 (5.8 to 6.6 amps for SEGO*P4A and 6.4 to 6.8 amps for 3EGOP48) are significantly lower than the values provided in Specification 2441.300-241 Rev. 2 (10.3 amps). For 3EGOPI A and 3EGOP18, the values

' for full load cunent (1.2 amps) and locked rotor cunent (4.46 to 5.02 amps for Code Letter J) in Specification 2441.300-241 also very frcm Calculation SP-MS-EE-011 (the full load current = 1.0 amps and the locked rotor current = 5.9 to 7.1 amps for 3EGOPI A, and the full load cummt = 1.2 amps and the locked retor cunent = 5.4 to 7.8 amps for 3EGOP18). The difference betwoon the tested values and the vendor's data provicted in the specification could effect the starter's breaker and thermal overload settin0s (these cannot be verified because the setting sheets are not avaliable for review).

2. For 3EGFP2A and 3EGFP28, the full load cunent value of ,

18 amps shown in Specification 2441.300-241 (Rev. 2), Plant Desi0n Data System (PDDS), and Production Maintenance Mana0ement System (PMMS) does not match the tested data shown in Calculations SP-MS-EE-011 Rev.1 (9.6 amps for 3EGFP2A and 9.5 amps for 3EGFP28), BAT 1 961241E3 Rev.

1 (9.6 amps for SEOPP2A), and BAT 2-961243E3 Rev.1 (9.5 amps for SEGFPJB). - The documents should be revloed to refied the actual full load cunent in addition, Calculation SP-MS-EE-011 shows a locked rotor cunent of 54 amps for 3EGFP2A which does not a0ree with the value of 58 amps used in Calculat'on BAT 1961241E3, This discrepancy should be

, reconciled, f,0 wever, the data used in performing bettery sizing calculations (58 amps in r'alada*H BAT 1-06-1241E3) is the hi0her value and therefore is conservative.

- 3. Calculadon SP-MS-EE 011 (Rev.1) shows 3EGOP1 A and SEGOPIB as non safety-related (i.e., a dash * " is shown ineload of an astertek " * "). This naladation should be revised to reflect the safety related -f::'.-,stien.

4. Calculation SP-MS EE-342 (Rev.1) states as an assumption g,,,,,, tM', %2;= S.H P., ;"~t .:;, ;::::: & 2 z'-2 :p

.j

- , <.-,s . - - , .

Northeast utsties ICAVP - M No. DN3499 Mmetone ur* 3 Discrepancy Report V6iues are not available from the projed documentation"_

(Appendix 8. Page 82), brake tes;-:;;;: (BHP) is equal to the nameplate ts+;-:;;; , efficiency is 0.92, and the power factor is 0.84 for 460V motors. However, for the 400V mdors SEGFP1 A, SEGFP18, SEGFV10, and 3EGFP1D, the proj6ct documentation is avaliable for this data but was not used in the calculation. The data for these motors is 1.6 BHP normal / 2.2 BHP maximum, a power factor of 0.915, and an efficiency of --

0.78 ('sforence Specificathn 2441.200 043, Add. 3, Rev. 0).

Since the adual brake horsepower is less than that assumed in the calculation, the results of Calculation SP-MS-EE 342 are conservative. However, since the adual data is known, either it should be used or the statement from SP-MS EE-342 should be revised.

Review Vebd invahd MM Date intilator: Kandet.D.J. O O O 12/357 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O O tati7/er VT Mgr: schop per, Don K O O '2/:SS7 IRC Chmn: singh, Anend K -

0 12tsieo7 Date:

INVALID:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

Prs *'wely identised boy NU7 Q vos @ No NonDesesepentComisman?Q vee () No ReeotutionPendinetO vos @ No Recesuineaunreeen.drO vos @ No Review

^ - . Not AWh Needed Dale VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A VT Mer: schopfer DenK 1RC Chmn: singh, Anand K O

g Date:

st Canonente:

Prtiled 1/7/961030:21 AM Page 2 or 2

. Northeast utsties ICAVP DR No. DRW3MM samstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review ereg: Operamene a Melrdenence end Teseng DR WID-Revle.v Element: Operamng Procedure Diesipene: Electrieel Deelen g y, Oloceepancy Type: 04 M & T Precedure gg i s, .- _ . .HVX 1 NRC Siqpdaeanse level: 4 Dele faxed to NU:

Date Puedished:

'"- 7 :i. Operator adions are used to compensate for design deficiencies.

Deeenpesen: The Operating procedure for Auxillcry Building Hasting, Ventilation and Air Conditioning directs the use of a " Dedicated Operator" in the e"ont that a Safety injedion signal (SIS) or Containment Depiessurization Aduation si0nal (CDA) is received or anticipated. The

• Dedicated Operator" is direded to open a panel circuit breaker to allow the Train A fan to respond automatically.

l One of the two Auxillary Building Filter Trains is required to opert's dunng accident conditions. It would be during this critical tire dist CWatin0 resources and attention would be diverted to compensate for design deficiencies.

The nonnal operating procedure for Auxiliary Building Heating, l Ventilation and Air Conditioning states that *3HVRTN6A is the preferred Auxiliary Building filter fan. If the following conditions are present, 3HVRTN6A will tv.)l start automatically:

3HVRTN68 running and fails but does not trip j Engineered Safety Features (ESF) actuation si0 nal is present. j in order to have 3HVRTN6A respond to the ESF aduation signal ( which is either the SIS ur CDA aduation signals) the l

' Dedicated Operstor* La directed to open 3SCV*PNLSP, circuit 11 breaker. This w!il result in c60sure of 3HVR-MOD 28B and an automatic shutdown of 3HVRTN68, allowing 3HVRTN6A to respond to ESF aduation signal."

The use of the "Dedicat.ad Operator' to compensate for long siano.n0 equipment or desi0n problems is considered an

" operator work-around". The use of this " operator work around" does not meet industry norms for conservative operations. S&L conceders this to be a discrepancy.

Rewra Valid involid Needed Date Inillator: ~ . _ _ 2, R. y Q Q 12/1747 VT Leed: Bees, Men G O O 12/1as7 VT Mgr schopfer, Den K Q O O 12/23s7

$2/31,s7 WIC Clunn: singh, Anand K Q O O Dgte:

INVAUD:

l m:

REsOLUrloN.

.% _ ?, identland by Nu7 Q Yes (*) No NonD6eeropentr%70 Yes (*) No

~

Printed 1/1/9610 31:13 AM Psos 1 or 2

Northeast utsties BCAVP M No. MWWO4 Mmeterm unit 3 Discrepancy Report n am p to v. @m n-em u-=*.eto va @m n

Intelstor: (none)

VT Lead: Bass, Ken O O E VT Mer: Schepest.DonK 50C chmn' Singh, Anand K O O D64e:

$L Comments:

i i

l l

l L

I l

l l

i l

l l

PrHed imS610.31:16 AM Page 2 of 2

I Northeast UWities ICAVP DR No. DRW8412 -

mone ure Discrepancy Report nev6e.emup: system DnVAuD movtow moment: syneem Design Diseipens: Moshenicet Deels" O vee Diserspency Type: %% g syssendproesse: Ras ISIC atendAsense levet: 3 Deh faxed k N Does PuWished: l Oteerepency: NPSHa for ECC. Pumps Durin0 Recirculation Modes of Operation l P-- ' 9: No basis was located for the capacity of the RSS pumps to.  !

i provide adequate NPSH to the SlH and CHS pumps for the hot and cold leg recirculation modes of ECCS.

' Calculations P(R)-0982, Rev. 0, F(R)-0083, Rev. O and US(B)-

294, Rev. 5 provide a basis for adequate NPSH for ECCS pumps talu'g suction from the RWST (DR-MP3-0704 addresses loconsistencies in this basis). However a review of design basis hydraulic calculations did not locate a similar analysis for the ECCS recirculation raodes (see DR MP3-0710).

The only information located on NPSHa for ECCS during recirculation mode was WoWinghouse Letter NEU 1893, "ECCS Hydraulic Analyses," dated 112 75. This letter provides a preliminary evaluation t,! ECCS pump NPSHa for the injection and recisW.ation modos, its preliminary conclusion was that the RWST provided adequate NPSH to the ECCS pumps for the injedion mode, but that a single failure would prevent the RSS pumps from providing sufficient NPSH to the SlH pumps for the cold leg recirculation mode. This conclusion, however, applies to the old configuration in which RSS was required to supply HHSI and LHSI simultaneously durin0 ECCS cold leg accirculation mode.

n.wie.

vese mvesd Neemen Dee hitlesor: Webstand, J. F. O O O 12/1187 vnese: . N.6, Arew i G O O $2/iss7

! VT Mgr; Sohepfer, Den K O O O 12/23s7 m c c =nn: sineh, Anand K O O O 52/sss7 Dees:

mAuD: ,

Date:

Resou m on.

L. _ :';leenIIAme by Nu? Q vos @ No NonDiserspentCondolen?U vos @ No

-penemetO v. @ No nemensenune-masto vos @ No noview inIMer. (none)

' VT Leed: Neri, Anthony A

- VT Mgr

schopfer, Den K IRC Clenn, singh, Anand K O- O-Date:

Prtreed 1/7A1610.31:44 AM Page 1 or 2

._ .. . ~ . . . . . . . ~ . ~ . . . - . - . . - - - - .

Northeast UtMies ICAVP m A m w urn u m ure s Discrepancy Report SL Conuments:

l l

l' i.

i Prtreed 1/7/9810:31:47 AM - Page 2 of 2 i

f

Northeast UWWes ICAVP DR Nc. DRW34714 Mihtorw unit 3 Discrepancy Report moview areup: system OnvAuD moview seement: system Design Deecipene: Emeenmnerdal OubhoeNon g y,

'"  ;- :p Type: %%

systenvProsese: N/A Om NRC signiacance level: 3 PW faxed f a NU:

Date Pubilehod.

% lio Class lE Cable EQ Testing Discrepancy .

D*ecei P #ea: The review of the Equipment Qualification (EQ) Franklin Test Report No, F-C4497 2, Rev. O, dated March 1977 for Class IE Gene.at Elodric (GE) 600V Vulkene insulated Cables inside the containment show that the cable did not undergo Flame Tests.

According to Milidone FSAR Section 3.3, page 8-3.26: All C! ass 1E cables are

• a tested in accordance with IEEE 383-1974 to ensure their ability to perform their intended functions.

IEEE 3831974, Section 2.5 describes the method for type teding of grouped cables Via the vertical tray flame led to determine their relative ability to resist fire.  !

In the above led report all tests were followed according to IEEE 383-1974 except Flame TeWing as required in Sc&on 2.5.

Review Valid invelld Needed Date infilator: Yeeein, S. O O 12/17'87 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A y Q 12/17/97 VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K S O O i2/22,7 12/31/97 IRC Chmn: singh, Anand K Q Q Date:

INVALID: )

Date:

REs0LUTioN:

7..." ";idenstand by Nu? O Yee (9) No NonD6ecrepentCondesten?O Yee (G) No W - Pendias7 O Yes @ Ne ~%unresented70 Yes @ No n.wi.w

• ,. - Nrd :, Needed Date VT Lead: Neri, Ardhony A VT Mgr: Schopfer, Dtc K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K O O Date:

alCommente:

i l

l Printed 1/7/9310:32:16 AM Page1 or 1 l-I

, ICAVP DR No. DRWW25 Northeast umme.

< . Mussorw unit 3- Discrepancy Report noview ensp: syanem omvaun nwww shmen: syneem Damien ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,

Dimet as: unchenloes cal'" O vee Desempency Type: N%

g g,

= a, -

n Hvx penc signmeena swet: 3 osse fax.:l to rau:  ;

puespuhashed Desempancy: SLCRS Exhaust Fans 3HVRYN12A/B Operating Point neeenpehm: Durin0 review of the supplementary leak coiledion and roleese system (SLCRS) sxhaust fan compliance with Raulatory Guide 1,52, Rev. 2, pera0raph C,3.1 a discrepancy was identified regardin0 evaluation of fan operation under all operating conditions, Reg. Guide 1,52, Rev. 2, para 0raph C.3.1 requires the system fan, mounting, and ductwork connections to be desi0ned, coctructed, and tested in accordance with Section 5,7 and 5.8 of ANSI N5091976, ANSI N5091976 Section 5,7.1 requires that:

1) The system designer shall prepare a system charaderistic curve for desi0n and limitin0 conditions under which the fans will be required to operate,

2) The fan shall be seleded to operate on the stable portion of its pressure curve undar all operating conditions, Nute 2 on P&lD EM-148E-10 states that the SLCRS flow rate of 9500 cfm represents the specified design flow rate also used for syriem balancing, System operabillty is demonstrated by

' technical specification surveillance flows of 7,600 to 9,800 cfm.

~

On an SIS signal, with power available to both divisions, fans 3HVRYN12A and SHVRYN128 both start and operate in parallel until one fan is shut dowit.

Discrepancies:

1) Review of the fan curve included in PDCR MP3 92 024 for the 38.5 indi diameter wheel indicates that at an airflow of 7,600 cfm the fan could be operating at or very near the unstable portion of the fan curve, A calculation that evaluates this condition was not found.

2) Cperation of fans 3HVRYN12A and 3HVRYN128 in parallel would result in the fans operatin0 h a potentially unstable portion of the fan curve, A calculation that evaluates this condition with the new fan wheels installed was not found, i< Review vesid invaad moeded osse initienor: Seout, M. D. @ p Q 12/1647 VT L.eed: Nort, Anthony A G O O 12/'* S7 VT Mor: Schepfer, Don K O O O $2r2aS7 Printed 117 Ale 1003.00 AM lh ge 1 or 2 i

a a

._ _ . - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . .

u ,theast utsties ICAVP M h M

• W 88 o Mmesme unit 3 Discrepancy Report l l

stC Chmn: % Anand K Q Q 12/31/97 l i

Does:

DNAUD:

Date 8tttOLUTION:

~

N/--- ", Wenuted by NUf Q Yes 'f) No NonObserspentCondalen?O Yes @ No l RosetutionPonding?O vos @ No - - unreseevedt O vos @ No Review AccepteWe Not AccepteWe Needed Date t m;g VT Leed: Nort, Anmeny A O O O VT Mgri Schupfer, Den K O u sto cienn: sinen, Anand K U U g

Date:

SL Commente:

l PrWed 117/9810 33;13 AM Pope 2 of 2

i m m useisee K:AVP Dm DM'84724 Maoissone unit 3 Discrepancy Report nwesw arei,: syunem DRvaun j nwtow element: syunem Deelen Dissipane: umheemd Dmi'"

O vm paseespeney Type: unerming Documwd 4, system 95eesse: Rs4 M eiensteense twel: 3 Date FAKod to NU:

Date Pm: ,

Olmerspency Iriconsistency between SER SoMion 6.2.2 & Calouait60n US(B).

249 w/ reaped to sump waterlevel l Dooeripteen: Aooording to the Safety Evaluation Report, NUREG 1031, ori0inal sedian 6.2.2. the top of the containment screen assemtdy is under about 10 feet of water following a LOCA. i Calculation US(8) 249. Revision 3, CCN 1 determines the maximum water elevation inside containmord followin0 a LOCA to be (-) 11' 3" The water elevation of (-) 11' 3' is based on the maximum water volume of the Refueling War.. Stora0e Tank (RWST), four sooumulators, Reador Coolant System (RC,5) and pressurizer. The top of the containment screen assembly is at elevation (-) 20' 21/2" (Drawing ES 53AM 1, Revision 1). The difference between (-) 11' 3' and (-) 20' 21/2" is 8' 11 1/2", not 10'.

In addition, Calculation US(B) 240 maximizes the water on the containment floor following a LOCA. This is not conservative when used as input to calculations to evaluate items such as NPSH margins for the RSS pumps and water velocity for <

cordainment debris transport.

nwiew Valid tweled Needed Date O O 12r2sr inleister: Feingsid, D. J. O 0 12/1**7 VT Lead: Nerl, Anthe'v^ B D VT Mort sahapter. Den K 9 O O 12rzner Q 12/3147 IRC Chmn: singh, Anand K Q Q Dele:

DNALW:

Dele:

naS0LUTioN: ,

^ ;^?;idenINled key NUf U Yes (@ No NonDescrepentCenetten7O Yes (@ No neeshmeneenenet O Yw @ Ne meseheenunteemedtO Yw @ No noiew Acceptable Not Asseptable Needed Date mg VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O O O viu nesonoun, Den K O O O

Wh %MK D e

sLCenensLk:

l i

~

l

- i ICAVP oR No. oRm733

, Nethenet uunties assiseaw unit: Discrepancy Report moveew esemp: system Dnvaus Revtow Blomme: 48smDeep poneness W been bleelpase: Eisserted Des

• O vos Diesempeney Type: componers ones g, sysenneveesse:Hvx Isto tiendaeanselevel: 3 Date PAMed to plus Date Puhtlehad. l

" l

. 4 Document D6screpanoles involv6ng HVAC Motors Desertpalen: 1. Calculations NL425 (CCN 8. Rev. 3) and NL438 (CCN 6, Rev. 2) show a power factor of 0.9 for 3HVR*ACU1 A and J 3HVR*ACU15, which disagrees with Spoolfloation 2176.430448 (Add.1, Rev. 0) which shows a power factor of 0.839.

L

2. Effloiency vertes for 3HVPYNI A, 3HVPYN15, 3HVPYN10, 4 3HVPYNID, SHVRYNM, SHVRTN68,3HVRTN12A, SHVRYN123, SHVR*ACU1 A, and SHVR*ACU1B between the specifloations, Plant Design Data System (PDD8), and ,

miaW Por 3HVRVNSA and SHVRVN68, Calculation NL-025 (CCN 8, Rev. 3) and NL 033 Pa0e 47 (CCN 1, Rev. 3) show  ;

' an efflaiency cf 0.902 which apress with Spoolfloation 2170.430-140 (Add.1 Rev. 2); however, Calculation NL 034 (CCN 6 Rev.  ;

2) and NL433 Page 40 show an affleiency cf 0.928 (NL-033's effloionoy is based on test results). For 3HVRYN12A and 3HVRYN128, Calculat6ons NL 025 and NL-038 show an offleionoy of 0.9 whidi dise0rees with Spoolfloation 2176.430-141 (Add.1, Rev 3) which has an offlolency of 0.925.

PDDS shows an effloiency of 0.92 for 3HVPTN1 A, 3HVPTN18, SHVPTN10, and SHVPTN1D which disagtoes i with Spoolfloation 2170.430140 (Add.1, Rev. 2) PDDS shows an offloloney for 3HVR*ACU1 A and 3HVR*ACU18 of 0.893

' which disa0 roes with the eff6ciency of 0.902 shown in i Speelflot*60n 2176.430448 (Add.1 Rev. 0). The appropriate documents should he revised to refloot the actual values.

3. Vendor Drawings 2170.430141002G and 2170.430141 004E show a desien broke horsepower of 75 for the i

3HVRVN12A and 3HVRYN128 driven equipment. This value does not a0ree with Spoolfication 2176.430141 (Add.1. Rev. 3) which shows a DHP limit of 47 and a max BHP of 67.5, or with  ;

Plant Design Data Syster,(PDDS) which shows a BHP of 60.  ;

Sinos the motor's developed horsepower is only 75, this >

encroaches on the motor's service factor which confids with FSAR Section 8.3.1.1.4. Note that Vendor Drawing 2170.430-l 1414018 showed a deoien BHP of 47, however, GRITS l- indiostes that this drawing is no lon0er valid r.s it is superseded by 2170.430141004E.

I- 4. The horsepower of SHVPYN1A,3HVPYN18,3HVPYN10,

,,. --J '"".T TMt 0 !: r ;. ; = "r t Czt 2t 44.P^g ,, 3 j L

L. . .-...,b,e , , - , - _ , _ . . . . -- . . _ . . ...__-,---m_-. -

_ ~. .

North .e umm 6CAVP DR N* DRN788 Mmetaw Unit 3 Discrepancy Report 011C and 2144.430140-010J with a horsepower rating of 40 but Vendor Drawing 2170.43014H10D showe a her=-;-:;. : rating of 60 (those drowings were reviewed against GRITS and are all active with no open chan0e documents that would affect the hor +;-::.:: rating).

The One Une Diagram EE 1 AK (Rev. 29), PDDS, and calculat6ons show a 40 horsepower rating. Either value (40 or 60 horsepower) exooeds the brake horsepower of the drivea equipment, although the 40 hcr+;- . : value is marginal. The j affeded documents should be revised to refled the actual horsopower rating.

This issue was addressed in Discrepancy Report DR MP3-0317, however, additional vendor drowings and the one line diagram documents are included in this DR which were not included in DR MP3-0317.

5. In Specifkation 2472.900 594 (Add.1. Rev.1), Dampers 3HVR* MOD 46A and 3HVR* MOD 468 require $63 inch-pounds of ,

I torque, tnt Vendor DrewinD 2472.900 594 265D indicates that these dampers require 595 inch-pounds. The affeded documents chould be revised to refied the damper's required torque. 1 l

6. Dampers 3HVR* MOD 140A and 3HVR* MOD 1400 are not shown in Calculation 210E (CCN 1, Rev. 0) and therefore the voltage for these dampers cannot be confirmed (the results are indeterminate). Also, the torque devtbped by the motors and required by these dampers is not shown in either Specification 2170.430140 (Add.1. Rev. 2) or Vendor Drawings 2170.430-140 200A or 2170.430140-2015. Therefore, the sizing of these dampers carmot be confinned (the results are indeterminate).

7. Calculation SP MS-EE 342 (itev.1) states as an assumption that, *where B.H.P., efficiency, p ower fedor and rated voltage valees are not available from the project documentation *

(Ap; endix B, Page B2), Drake hi nopower (BHP) is equal to the nameplate hor ==-r;.::, efficient y is 0.92, and the power factor is 0.CS for 460V motors. Howeve ', for the followin0 460V motors, the project documentation is r tallable for this data but was not used in the calculation.

3HVPTNIMWC/D; BHP (rated) = 37.2; PF = 0.85; EFF = 0.90 3HVRTN6A/B: BHP (rated) = 53.5; PF = 0.92; EFF = 0.90 3HVRTN12A/B: BHP (rated) = 47 or 75; PF = 0.90; EFF =

0.625 (the BHP for 3HVRTN12A and 3HVRTN128 is shown as 47 in the specification but 75 on Vendor Drawings 2144.430141002G and 2144.430141004E) 3HVRTN13A/B BHP (rated) = 45.1; PF = 0.92; EFF = 0.90 3HVRTN14A/B: BHP (reted) = 39.9; PF = 0.90; EFF = 0.88 3HVR*ACU1A/B: BHP (re[gd) = 37.2: PF = 0.64: EFF = 0.90 _ -

Prvred tm96103400 AM Page 2 or 3

Ncwtheast utmeios K:AVP M

• M*W88 wiistone unit 3 Discrepancy Report where BHP = brake hor +;-ncr, PF = power fa;: tor, and EFF =

• ff W )

d Since the edual broke horsepower is less than that asbumed in i the calculation, the results of Caloulallon SP MS-EE 342 are

^

conservative. However, since the actual data is known, either R "

should be used or the statement from SP MS-EE 342 should be ftVited, moview Vand kneed Needed Date inittster: Mendes, D. J. O O $2/1557 12/16,7 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A Q Q Q VT Mort Sohepter Den K O O O 52/22,7 Q 12/3147 WIC Chmn: Sm Anand K Q Date:

UWALID:

Date:

MEGOLUTION:

N/- "ildentshad enf NUP U vos @ No Non Discrepent Condenon?U vos @ No

"% PendinstO ve. Ci> No neessuti iun,s.eevedtO vee @ No noview

%g P Net h e Needed Date

( VTLead: Non, Ardheny A VT Mgr Schapter Don K 1RC Clenn: 8% Anand K Date:

SL Comments:

Petted 1/7Me 10 3412 AM Tage 3 or 3

.I

K:AVP DR No. DR4P34738

, Northeast utilities

' 'M"'me unit 3 Discrepancy Report ,

w I nwesw emap

system onvAun

[ """""'""W peeenew opwohnny i.eue

" - * " - ' ' ~ o v.

. einempeney Type: mm gg

sp .-_ Dax NRC Sientseense level

4 bets faxed le 14J:

Date Puhashed:

-v Calculat6on of the Loa $n0 on the Normal and Reserve Stat 6on Transformers (Calculation NL 026)

E: J ~ Calculation NL-026 determines the loading on the Nonnel Stat 6on Servios Transformers and the Reserve Station Service Transformers and the main connections to these transformers. It '

vertfies that the transformers and the Interconnedions will be operated within their capsdly under normal and accident condnions. We have the following comments on this calculation:

The numerical results for the loading of the primary winding of NS8 'A' are taken from a branch that is upstream from the transformer primary (2A to 15G3XAH) at Main Transformwr A.

The loadin0 on the transformer winding itself is lower. The adual load in the NS8 "A" can be measured at the branch between nodes 38 and 16G3SAH, The calculation should be revised to refled the actualload on NS8 'A' The loa $ng of the neoondary windin0s of the transformers given in the calculallon are different from the loadings that are calculated from the computer runs in Calculat6on NL-038. The beels for the loadin0 values 91ven in the calculation should be explained.

Value in Values from NL-038 Calculation PerUnit Current Calculated

, Transformer Condition (kVA) Voltage (A) Loading (kVA)

NS8 A (X) Normal 16920 0.906 2572.4 16793 NS8 A (X) LOCA 17550 0.904 2673.2 17412 NSS A (Y) Normal 14890 0.909 2259.7 14800 NS8 A(Y) LOCA 16450 0.904 2514,1 16376 RSS A (X) Normal 16920 0.902 2581.9 16780 RSS A (X) LOCA 17550 0.900 2683.8 17404 RSS A(Y) Normal 14890 0.907 2263.2 14791 RSS A (Y) LOCA 16450 0.902 2519.1 16372 uen a m unimmi t ann naa tan a t aun Preited 10/98 to 34 M AM Page 1 or 3

{

i l

, Nwtheast ummes ICAVP DR No. DRW8 47M mem== unit 3 oi.crep ncy n. port NS8 8 (X) LOCA 18450 0.936 1644.2 18392 NSS B (Y) Normal 24610 0.918 2228.0 24444 N88B(Y) LOCA 24610 0.918 2228.6 24450 RSS B (X) Normal 18450 0.937 1642.3 18391 RSS B (X) LOCA 18450 0.937 1642.5 18393 j RSSB(Y) Normal 24610 0.919 2224.3 24430 i RSC B (Y) LOCA- 24810 0.919 2224.6 24433 The calculation assumes that the loading on the Class 1E 480 voit system is the same durin0 s LOCA and normal operation. r However, this is not consistent with the medium voNage system where equipment is provided spoolfically to miti0ste an accident. L Therefore, the loading dur.'no a LOCA is expeded to be bl0her than during normal operation (See DR MP3 0385 and DR MP3-0690).

Nem 4 on pa0s 4 of the calculation states thot some of the 6.6 kV motor brake powers were taken from the motor data sheets included in Attachment 5 and others were taken from Calculation NL-038. Similariy, the calculation states that some of the 4 kV motor brake powers were taken from Calculation NL-033 and that others were taken from Calculation NL-038. Nevertheless, the computer runs that are given as the source of the transformer w6nding loadines are said to come from NL 038. The celeviation nesos to explain the relationship between the various sources used for brake powers and the computer runs that give the loadin0s of the branches in the auxiliary system. If computer runs were prepared that modified the brake powers of the loads l

given in '*% NL 038, they nood to be included as i attachments.

For the equation on the bottom of pa0e 3 to give results in MVA, the current must be in klicampetes. The tabulated resuks on i pace 4 are correct. The same comment applies to the calculation of the constraint imposed by the reting of the non-segregated phase bus, n.*w l

veas bass N e.d Oste keuston eineen,o weem O O O 12ms7 vnsed: Nwl. Amwy A Q Q Q 12/1747 YT Men schepeer. Den K @ Q Q 12/2397 l

mcch==: em An nd K O O O 12/8187 Date:

I sWAUD:

Date:

Pnnled 1/74810.34 Js Ank Page 2 or 3-gy--w-r--- e- y---- +y ,w+,e g ,-sr-g-e- + w e- y --+- < -m-+r v-e= *-'=-g-

, Nath. net M N:AVP DR N* DR*WM 888staw th* 3 Discrepancy Report Provtounty idenseed buy NWt U vos @ No WonOlsepepentCondelantU vos @ No Rosetullen PenenetO vos Co>No ReessugienuneensisedtO voo (8) N.  !

Rev6ew m , (n n ) We WP Needed Date j VT Land: Nort, Anthony A VT Mor schapsor, oa K etc coonn: sineh, Anand K g g O O ome:

sL Conenente:

PrHod 1/T4610:34 40 AM Page 3 of 3 l

l

t

~

North est umme. ICAVP DR

• DR

• 84748 .

morm ur* 3 Discrepancy Report l Revtew troup: system DR VALID Revtow seemese: System Doeten Olselpane: 1 & C Desi'"

Deserepomy Type: Dres*g O Ya (9) No systenWProcese: Dox l IdRC $4pntheance level: 4 Date faxed to NO:  ;

DatePubashed.

Desereremy Drawing Discrepency . LSK4 9A, Rev 9 Desertpalen:

References:

1. Loop Schematic SEGF-040A, Rev 3 for Transfer Pump 3EGFP1A Control

2. Loop Schematic 3EGF-0408, Rev 4 for Transfer Pump 3EGFPIB Control ,

3. Loop Schematic 3EGF 041 A, Rev 4 for Transfer Pump SEGFPIC Control

4. Loop Schematic SEGF-041B, Rev 6 for Transfer Pump SEGFP1D Control Per referonoes 1 through 4 above, the Emeroency Generator Fuel System Fuel Oil Transfer Pump will stop automatically if the control swNch is in ' auto", the day tank level is high and the bypass soledor swHoh is in 'on' (not in ' bypass"). The logic diagram does not show a ' control adion" of the control switch in

' auto" posMion to the pump stop logic.

Per references 1 through 4 above, the presence of a motor thermal overload will prevent a pump start of trip the pump if it is running. The absence of a motor thermal overload is a prerequisNe for pump start; the logic diagram shows two (2) signals from the motor therme' overload relay 49, both going to the pump stop logic; there is no signal from the motor thermal overload relay to the pump start logic.

Escutcheons for pump 3EGF'P1C control swHoh and bypass soledor sdch are missing

! Rev6ew vend invand Needed Date Inilleteri Pmeios, H- 0 O O 52/15/87 v7 w: N"' ^=v ^ O O O m SS7 52/22,7 YT Mgr: schapter, Den K O O O m e cienn: einen. Anand K O O O 12/stie7 Date:

pWAUD:

Date:

RESOLUTioti:

~ ~

.tf:rf;identised by Nu? U Yes @ he HanObscrepentCondmenPO Yes @ No ResoluttenPendens?O v @ N. - unt eveer o Yes @ No Review i ^,*" Nei ^ ::. " " Needed Date Printed tmos to 36 os AM Page i or 2

o met utmees K:AVP M k mesam u m urea Discrepancy Report i VT Laod: k Anthony A O O j W Myi schup4er, Den K O O sec cavan: segh. Anand K O u O -

O u Date:

sL Commente:

f

+

k I

I PrMed 14/9810.3612 AM PaSe 2 of 2

-+. - - . . . . . - - . . . , - . _ .

o {

' DR No. DR44P34748 W Umdes WAVP f mile 6erm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report  !

noview em,: opween s useewonee ww Teseg onvaus i nov6ew menent: conseve Aenen Presses i lueespane: opersonne '

O va Dlowepeney Type: cavessee Aenen g g, i systenWpensees: Hvx j

NRC tigniseense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

l pene Pubashed:

n . - :i. Incomplete close out on Lloonsee Event Report (LER) i commumerds.

Desertpelen: The corrective actions to an LER oommhted to monMorinD  :

outalde gir temperature every 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. N then directs the plant staff to take actions when the outside air temperature drops bolcw 20 degrees Fahrenhet. A commument rooord was revised on Mardi 24,1997 to eliminale the nood for monMoring the outande air temperature. The corrective adlons in the LER were not revised.

LER 92 020-00 was written on September 23,1992. NU commNment was *Outside air temperature will be monMored every 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. N outside air temperature drops below 20 de0rees  !

Fahrenhet, one train of Auxiliary Building FIMer System will have -}

Na VIVs and temperature control dampers placed in automatic  ;

I and the other train will be planed in the pull to look and doolared inoperable' (Commitmord Rooord 17389). i NU letter B;4279 was written on November 12,1992. This letter was written to inform the NRC staff of '...the back0round, status, and couros of action taken for resolution of the desl0 n deficiencies related to the Auxiliary Buildin0 Ventilat6on System (ABVS) and Supplementary Leak Colledion and Release System (SLCRS) for Millstone UnM No. 3.' The letter ackrc;M-;+' addMional actions required to support plart operation with an outside air temperature below 17 do0rees Fahrenheit. These actions included addmo non safety grade temporary heat system inside the auxiliary buildin0. Two I CommRmerW Rooords 19216 and 19219 were written on November 12,1992 and remain open.

CommRmerd Rooord 17389 was revised on March 24,1997. The  !

validation text states that

• the monMoring of ouldde air '

temperature is no longer necessary after that PDCR MP3 93-067 InstaNed a QA Cat I heating system to maintain the summothvinter temperature of the Aux building CHS/CCP wNhin

- the design limns." 1 S&L considoos the corrective action of installin0 the cate0ory 1 heatino system to be the appropriate corredive adion. However, the LER 92420 corrective amions were not revised. Thus the Nuoleer Regulatory Commision (NRC) was not notified of the change. This is considered to be inadequate dose out of regulatory commRments and to be a discrepancy, moview Vetd bovend pesaded Date Intheter: PtwW R.- Q g 12/1747 Prmeed 1/rme to.3s33 AM Pepe 1 or 2 i

- , .,,,r- - , , - - - , _ . - , - - - - , . . . _ , , - , - . - - . - , - , _ . . _ _ - . - , - . . - - - - - - _ . _ . . - . - . . - _ . - - , - - - - - - -

o Netheast utsties DCAVP M k M*W#  !

Mmme unit 3 Discrepancy Report n w: sees.xea a O O '*7

'*7 n m en am en,tw x 0 0 O etC Cousui: segh, Anand K Q Q 12/31/97 Date:

iWAUD:

Dele:

RESOLim 0N:

Provisuely WantNled by NU? O vos (o7LD Non Deserspent Cenellen?Q vos @ No

-- PonangtO v. @m neeene iu - e m edt O vee @m nev6.w m;g 'P Nd W^ Needed De6e n Lead: sees,kon O O O n men sw.oen x 0 sac c w : s*vn,Annd

• O Dele:

O b O sL Commente: i l

l l

l Preiled 1/1/96 to 3tL37 AM Page 2 of 2'

l s'

ICAVP DR No. DR44P34N Nwthead USNues Mindaw unit 3 Discrepancy Report newtow Geoep: operosens s Mehemence end Te% DR VAUD novtsw teament. Carrenew Acmen Presses l

Disalpan: OPerehens g y, Dioerepeny Type: canoew Acom g g, s,U : ::: HVX Nmc sisedacenselevd: 4 Done Fames to Nu: l Does Pubilehod:

Diesrepency Ineffective resolutlon of common mode fei6ure.

DweHP #en: Doensee Everd Report (LER) 91018-01 states that: '...as a resuM of a loss of a non vhal power supply, a common mode failure ooourred which rendered both trains of the Supplemental  ;

Leak Collect 6on and Release System (SLCRS) inoperable. The postulated cause is steam entering the common SLCRS discharge duct, meMing the fusible links for the Train 'N and Trsin 'O' f6re dampers (3HVR*DMPF44 and .NiVR*DMPF29 respectively), and causing the fire dampers tu close. The root cause is design defloiency. The waste gas system and SLCRS were not property designed to handle a loss of non vital power.

As corrective action, the fusible links were replaced end the SLCR8 retumed to service. The design of the SLCRS and waste gas system were reviewed and procedural changes made to prevent a common mode failure of the SLCRS due in a lots of non-vital power.'

The analysis of event states that: * ..should a loss of offsNe power ooour followed by a safety injedion signal, t%re is a possibility that the SLCRS could bomme inoperable due to a common mode failure.'

in response to this event an addMional corredive adion revised platt operating procedures to dited the control room operators to close the Main Steam isolation Valves in the event of a loss of non vital power. This procedure change to compensate for a de9pn deficiency is ocMrary to the industry practice of reducing operator work arounds.

S&L does not consider this to be appropriate long-term corrective action and to be a disoropancy, noview vess hwans me.ees osee inteleter: P6enledet. R. Q Q D 12/497 i

v n ees: se=,

• O O O 12/+s7 vt ur: sehe,6w.oen K O O O 12/1157 IRC Chmn: singh, Anand K Q Q Q 12/31/97 Dele:

mAuo:

l l Date:

! REsOLUTloei:

M  ?, tennetted by Nut O Yes @ No NonDeserepentCandleton?Q Yes @ No l

mPenenstO va @ me meeshmenuneoedvestO y= @ we PrWees 1/Tes to 3s ob AM Paes1 or 2

l O

Netheast UWho ICAVP M k m e s4 m MN M 3 Discrepancy Report

. ,, e um e - om VTLast Some, Man O O O VT IApr Schspier, Den K O O O 50C Clusst: $Nh, M K Date:

SL cenenense:

L 1

Pitnted in/9610.3607 AM Page 2 of 2

_ _ . . . . _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . - . . . _ . . _ . . _ - .. , . . . _ . _ , . -- . . _ . . ~ . . _

Netheast UWWoo ICAVP DR k D!WP84N metaw u'* 3 Discrepancy Report t

Review Grg: Operehens & Maintenance end Tesen$ DRVAUD A= tow sammad: Operamng rmen ,,,,

'""*"" '*'**"' O v.

Diowspeney Type: O 4 M & T Proceswo g~ g j SysteaWpresese: RSS NRC Sissdesense W: 4 Date faxed le NU:

DatePuhushed-

~~

Otewspawy: Inconsistency betwn procedure EOP 35 ES 1.3 and drawing LSK-24.9A w/ respect to sequencer operation D=*rtr*6ea: Procedure EOP 35 ES 1.3 Reviolon 6, Note on page 3, states that the sequencer automatically starts the cold leg recirculation components once in the rec' txAstlon mode. According to drowing LSK 24.9A Revision 9, no components are started by the sequencer after the containment recirculation pumps are started. Also, no other documents can be found that show component (s) required for cold leg recirculation are started after the ccntainment recirculation pumps are stened. Therefore, the subjed procedure note appears to be ir. Ot ror, arrJ may cause confusion for the operator.

R wiew vand invand Needed Oste initiateri Feinssid,0.4 Q g Q 12/1147 n t=* *ea. ken a m O $2

• 7 v7 men senspear. Den x 0 0 O $2t23 7 12/3'87 mc Cn : sign. Anand x 0 0 O Date:

DNAUD: l Date:

REe0LilTioN:

N. _ : '; identemed by NUf Q Yes @ No NonDeserepentCondalenFO vos @ No Rosensen ponenetO v. @m Reseksenune.e*edrO va @*

l w - Na w - Nee.ed De

, ,,,,,,,,,n,,,,,,

n t.eed: ases, Men O O O vT Mon Schopfer. Den K U 1000 Cnan: Sangri, Anand K g

M:

SL Commente:

Prtiled WA 1036.32 AM Pope 1 of 1

._~ .- _

l i

l ICAVP DRN' DR*"P8470 Nodheast UWWes l Musetone ure 3 Discrepancy Report natowemup;tWem DaVaun  !

natow elemem: system Deep  % a ,,,,,,,,, %

amesipalm: strucewed Des

• Desempowy Type: Cakadshen O Y.

(4)No 0,1 -  : swr NRC Signetsense level: 3 Date faxed to NU:

pene Puhmehed.

thesapeney: Equipment mounting calculation poortpeten: We have reviewed '$.e Conduit Support Calculatbn no.12179- ,

BE 52YT , ReV.0.

Based upon this review.we have noted the following discrepancy:

Calculation no.12179-BE 52YT has been provided by NU as a reference calculation for the qualification of the mounting of the junction box no. SSWP*J839A,8. Review of the aforementioned calculation has not identified any specific reference to the qualification of the mounting detail for the ,

junction box no. SSWP'J839A,8.

nwiew ,

Vaud invahd Needed pelo inluster: Kleic, N O O O 12/i2 7 VT Lead: Nerl, ANIhery A @ e 12/1147 12/2347 VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K -

50C Chmn: Singh, Anand K -

Q 12/3147 Date:

mum:

( Does:

(' REtoLUTION:

7../-- ';identlhed by nut U Yes (@ No NonD6eenpentCondu6en?Q Yes (@ No nosameaPonenet O Ya @m n=* dica um.*edrO va @m ne*.

AseepteWe Not aWaMa Needed Date

%g VTLead: Nort, Anshony A O O O YT Mgrt Schepler, Den K O g IRC Clenn: Singh, Anand K g g Date:

SL Commente:

4 I

~

Printed 1/1/0810.37M AM Pope 1 or 1

, ~ _ _ . .

i Nathoest Umuss K:AVP M k M**** '

naisseam Unit 3 Discrepancy Report l noseew eresqp: tratam en VALID newtow summe: system Desir i stasipase: seustwed Deelp  ;

O va Dneerepeter Type: Caisubman g ,

SystenWpresses aWP NRC aipleoenee twel: 3 Date faxed to NW:

Date Philshed:

. -si Equipment mount 6ng calculat6on Desertpalen: We have reviewed the Conduit Support Calculation no.12179- [

BE 52YT , Rev.0.

Based upon this review we have noted the following discrepancy:

Calculation no.12179-BE 52YT has been provided by NU as a reference calculation for the quellficat6on of the rnountin0 of the junction box no. 38WP'JB39A.B.Rev6ew of the aforementioned ca6culation has not identifled any specific reference to the qualification of the rnounting detail for the junct6on box no. 38WP'JB39A.B.

neview Velid twelid Needed Date Inalater: Mimic. N O O O '2/12*7 v n eed: N i. A,ewiy A Q Q Q mW VT Myr: Schopfer.oen K ,

Q O 12/2197 dW Clenn: 8% Anand K Q Q Q 12/31/97 Date:

INWalm:

i Date:

nEtoLArH006.

.t/ ?;leseWIAnd by Nu? O Yes (@ No Non Diessepent Cenellen?O Yes @ No nosoluttenPenang?O vos @ No meseiuisen un,essivedr O vos @ ' No moview Aseeptable Not Acespeehis Needed Date mg vitsd: Nort. Anthony A U U '

viu ne sene,en oenK O O. O etc cienn: em Anans K l Date:

SL Canoneses:

I f

I Petreed 1/7/9610.37.21 AM Pese 1 of 1 '

l

m mfwrue. ICAVP DR No. M34m {

M686d8ww L 9 Discrepancy Report

.o moview eree: Prepanomme OnVAun l 1

nov6ew element: correeve Acmen Preasse Dissipens: I & C Deely' O v.

06eeroponey Type: Cervestems Acean gg g syeMessee: HVX l IstC tegneteense level: 4 Date faxed le Idu:

Date Puhitehed:

08"apaaer: Design Deflolency Report (DDR) Resolution Desertp86sa: DDR 642 states that specification 2472.600486 permits vertical

• mounting of the instrumord The soceptabilMy of vertical '

mounting in specifk* tion 2472.4004t$ could not be found, if documentauon does exist that substantiates the soooptabilMy of the vertical mount 6tc, inis documentation was not provided when requested from NU, in addition, no documentation could be found in DDR 582 that substantiates what corrective adions were taken to revles the vendor's installation details (hoirontal mount 6ng) in order to correct the d6screpency between the vendor's details and the 'as installed

• configu stion,

n. view vens i ns nomeed Das insisten Dembreneid,Jern a O Q 12/1697 VTLead: Ryan, Thames J Q Q Q 12/2247 52/22,7 vr m en sehsps., Den K "

O Q 12/3147 wic Cienn: sorgh, Anmd K m Q

Date:

1. NALD:

Does:

( nE40LUTtoed:

Pr*Wlously idenused by NU? O Yes (@ No NonDeserspentCondu6enfQ Yes (IlNo me-ausenrenanst O Y= @ we nee m umen unree d dr O Y a @ we noview Aseeptable ud Acceptable Needed Date bdueton M VT Lead: Ryan, Themes J O O O VT Men Schnpfer Den K O O Wec otunn: Singh, Anand K [

Date:

SL Comments:

i l

l PrHod if/4810.37:s3 AM Pese 1 el 1

. . , . , - . - . - . _ . . , - . . . - . . . ,.,~.,,m,-._.- - . . . . _ , , . - . , _ _ _ - . , _ . . . - - _ . _ _ . . _ , , . - - _ _ _ . _ . . . . - . . . _ . _ . . . _ . . . . . _ _ - . _ - _ _ , - - -

I Nwtheast Ummes ICAVP DR N* D N 84788 mistetaw unit 3 Discrepancy Report no e ,: r, ,- ,. = DavAuD

• ",==

• Poseseg operehanyleous Dissi  :: a C D=w. o y, Descenpency Type: Dro*g

~-

(g) g

~

s., 7 N/A  ;

NRC signitaann twel: 4 pelo faxed le NU:

Oste Puhitehed:

P . -i; Un6ncorporated rev6s;ons" i Daartytten: DDR 608 was incorporated under E & DCR N-EC-00336. The following list of affected documents as documented on E & DCR N-EC40336 have not boon revised:

1. 2424400-427 079 sht. 30

3. 2424400-427-079 sht. 32

3. 2424 600-427479 sht. 33

4. 2424400-427 079 sht. 37

5. 2424400 427479 sht. 53

6. 2424 4 00-427 009 7, 2424-600-427418

8. 2424 400-427 020 neview Valid invalid Needed Date Inillater Damasomoid. Jim O O '2ti2 7 YT Leed: Ryan. Thomas J O O O 12/i**7 VT Myn shpw, Den K Q Q Q 12M me Co-ni sigh. Anand K O O O '2/8157 WWAUD:

Date:

REs0 Lim 0N' Pronously identined by Nu? U ise @ No NonD6eerepentCondnion?Q vos @ No

--PenenerO va @ No neessunenunraceadrO va @ No mwtow Aeoentshie Not Aosspiehle M Date m;g vT Lead: Ryan, Yt.wnes J VTIngr schapler. Den K O b b

1RC Chmn: Sineh. Anand K O 0 O O Date:

sL conenente:

Printed 1/14s to:8 26 AW Pope 1 of 1 -

i

,, , - _ . - - . . , - - . - . , . - - _ ~ . - _ , - - - . . _ . - . _ _ _

m m unene. EAVP DR h. DN34761 Minetwo unit 3 Discrepancy Report nevie. oree,:P, w OnvAuD movtow shment: ceneense when Process Diseme=: i a C D"*"

. :, Type: Presseee O vos Systemeresses: OSS g,

NRC W kel: 4 Date famed le NU:

DatePuhushed.

Dwy SetpoirW Change without modification packa0s.

1 Dee%: The setpo6nts for instruments SQSS*LS56A thru D, affected by setpoirW calculation SP 3QSS-9, and 38WP'FIS36A & B, FIS37A & B and Fl8118A & B, effected by setpoint calculation 3 ENG 106 were revised w6thout implementirg the change through the use of an approp4sie modWication process, No implementing documentation (e.g. SCR, PDCR, DCR) was provided when requested from NU.

neview vand erwend Needed Dese l I

xdlisher: Derrceweld, Jim O 12tias7 O

VTLeed: Ryan, Themes J O O O $2/5SS7 )

VT tepri I,4hapfer, Den K O O O $2/2557  !

1RC Cee-w thsh, Aneruf K Q g Q 12/3s/97 l Dese:

ENAUD:

Dete.

RESOLUTIOti:

)

Previouseyetre , ,gesi try NUf U vos @ No Non Descrepard Condm6en?Q vos @ No nos.haienrenenerO v. @m n=*menunroemedtO vee @ No Moview P W Acceptable Needed Date

%g VT Lead: Rpn, Themes J O O O VT teer: Schepier, Den K IRC Chmn: Sheh, Anand K g

g , ,

Oste:

6L C enenents:

PrHt111mB810.39.24 AM Page 1 or 1

Northeast ummes K:AVP DR N* DR #P84788 Milleterm ute 3 Discrepancy Report moview emi,: syenom envaun newtow seement: synnem Desip Dissipene: Elemel

• l O ves '

Dneerapency Type: NW gg syseenweresses: Hvx NRC algneteense loves: 3 Date faxed to NU:

Date puhnehest: 12/1/9s E . 4 D6ecrepancies involving VoMage Drop Calculations 209E 210E, and 212E Deeerspelen: A. Comments Which Apply to All Three Calculations 209E (CCN

1. 2, Rev. 0),210E (CCF' #1, Rev. 0),212E (CCN #2, Rev. 0):

1. These calculations refer to Calculatio'1 NL-038 as the calculation of record concoming mlrdmum motor control center bus voMage. However, calculation NL 042 Rev. 2 CCN 5

("dograded voNage") lies lower vohage levels than NL 038 as shown below; MCC 200E/210E/212E NL-042 3EHSWCC1A1 433 voRs 427 volts 3EHSWCC3A1 435 voNs 427 vous SEH8*MCC181 428.8 voMs 424.1 volts 3EHSWCCIA2 430 voks 424 voks 3EHSWCC381 435 vous 430 volts 3EltSWCC3A2 431 voNs 428 voks N is not clear why NL 038 and not NL-042 is referred to as the calculation of record.

2. These calculations state that they are for reference only (*not a living document"). They da not state what calculation (s) control and evaluate the effeds of future addMions, deletions, or changes, only that PDCRs whidi implement chan0es will address the volta 0e drop of the changed circuit.

3. Installed cable lengths, which are documented as attachments to these calculations, are often substituted for cable lengths listed in NU's cable receway database "M3CBLRWY".

However. W3CBLRWY" has not been updated to include these installed cabic lengths, therefore, K is not clear how NU maintains control to guarantee that the same cable length is used for the same cable in all calculations. Examples of the differences in cable lengths (expressed in feet) are:

CAbiLE NUMBER MSCBLRWY AS-BUILT SHVPAOC500 15 8 3HVPBPC500 12 8 and 9 (see Calc 210E below) 3HVPAOK515 175 105 3HVPACO518 295 275 3HVPAOC520 135 158 3HVRCOC500 10 8 3HVRAOC502 10 8 twuot'rv'Ain 92A 107117A (m- t'_ala 9nGF halmA

-PMead 1/1/9s 103e 54 AM Page 1 of' 7

., g ggg,, l CAW DR No. DR44P34763 Mule 6ene Unit 3 Discrepancy Report 3HVRCOC612 375 286 3HVRC00611 480 600 3HVRCOC413 130 130 3HVRAOC606 230 176 3HVRAOC664 230 100 3HVRAOC601 110 100 1 3HVRAOC608 160 626 i 3HVRAOC606 - 100 100 l 3HVROPCM1 286 340 3HVRSPC680 M 16 3HVRCPC626 26 il 3HVRCPCl36 220 282 SEOPOPM400 106 210 38YSNOL400 to 40 38YSNOL402 M 40 .

38YSNOL810 46 16 l 38YSNOL411 46 il )

38YSNOL420 46 30 38YSNOL846 220 185 i SBYGNOL444 320 1M 38YSNPL400 76 40 35YSNPL402 76 40 38YSNPLA10 60 20 38Y8NPL411 60 20 38YtNPLM6 180 100 I 38YSNPL448 100 100

4. The vendor drawings and coloulations d6ffer from the vendor drawings and from each other in the values used for fun load current for the dampers. The coloulat60ns are not consisterW in what type of cummt is used (i.e., fun load or looked rotor) in computing vohage drop for the damper citouNs, with Calculations 200E and 210E using fun load current and Calculation 212E udne looked retor ounern, Calculation 200E unos the fun load cunent value of 2.2 amps (bened on minimum allowable volta 0e of 102 volts). t*mion 210E unos the fun load current value of 1.02 amps (booed on 230 VA + 120 voks), Calculation 212E uses the looked rotor cunent value of 4.0 amps (based on a memo of a telephone conversation wth the vendor attached to the *W as Attachment E). Thoes calculation values do not agree wth Vendor Drawings 2472.900 6W 2128 and 2472.900164 2138 which reflect a fun load ounent value of 2.0 amps and a looked rotor ounent value of 10.0 amps,

'**% 200E and 210E should use the looked rotor ounord when performing the volta 0s drop calculations, just a.

Calculation 212E does, but using the vendor's certified drowing data (as it is the most conservaWye). The test data included in Attachment C of Calculethn 212E (this is shown in Attachment H of NW 200E and Attachment F of Calculation 210E) ind6 cates that the starting cunent (locked rotor cummt) ls 8.4 amps whleh disagrets with the dela in the tt$,we converneuon, The dcta in the telephone conversation should -

only be used (in 16eu of the data from the vendor drawings) If a justinostion is provided to indloste why It is more suitable than the vendor's drawinn data.

Poems uras to.se.57 AM Pese 2 or 7

,m. y v s, .'?-.,--,,,np,,,w+--,m--,-,--w-,- .,.c,m---+nS~m<-e v-w-~ - m-<-v* , - - ~ ~ * ~ < .-,------+L---------------

_. , l w gggge, l cap DR No. DR MP34743 nelBeterm unit a Discrepancy Report

s. when on ene m primny neue unpedanoe (m is =

impedance inwn the motor contal conder to the panel step 4 awn transfamw) imm the rimary owe of the transformw to the i secondary side of the transformer, Calculation P0E considers the transformer boost but Calculations 200E and 212E do not.

Caioulations 200E and 212E ehould be revised.

4. The transformer impedance of the panel step down transformer no0lects the tolerance when CMOO.s the ohmic value. A justilloelion for negiooting this tolerance shouW be stated or the toismnoe should be included.

7. These enhh%s sta6e in thair CCN *Romeon for Chanos" that they eArected panel volta 0es from FahW 164E, however a review of rShMM 164E holostes that it is only a 1 i- loading '=h% and does not provide volta 0es. This note i should be revised.

l

8. The curvesit at the panel loads is bened on using the nominal -l 120 voit current reting. This cunent may not be constant as the panel volta 0e dips below 120 volts. The current should be based  !

on actual devios terminal volta 0s.

8. Calculation 212E (CCN 82,Rev. 0) i i

1. Attachment A Pa0e 72 shows the 120 volt source for Dempers 3HVR'M0048A, 3HVRWQD60A, 3HVR* MOD 49C1, and 3HVR'MDDSOC1 as Panel 38CV'PNut10 which is fed

, from Motor Control Center 3EH8'MCC1 A2. This dise0rees with  ;

the One une Diagram 8.E 1CC (Rev. 31) and with Calculation 212E, Pa0es 23 29 which show these dampers as fed from Panel 38CV'PNL60 (which in tum is fed from Motor Control  :

Center SEH8'MCCSA2). This appears to be a documentation discrepency with no impact on the calculation's results, 6

r

2. Attachment A. PeGe 72 shows the 120 volt source for Dempers SPYR* MOD 498, 3HVR*MDD40C2, 3HVR* MOD 608, and 3HVR*MDD60C2 as Panel 38CV'PNut1P which is fed from Motor Control Center 3EH8%CC182. Panel 38CV'PNLR1P is shown on ESK4AEA (Rev. 6) and ESK4AE8 (Rev. 3) as  :

feeding the releys asecolated with the dampers This disepress  ;

with Schematic Diagrams ESK4AEA and ESK4AES which show these dampers as fed fmm Panel 38CV'PNL9P. The One une Die 0 rem EE.1CC also shows these dempers as fed from l Panel 38CV'PNL9P (which in tum la fed from Motor Control Center SEH8'MCC381), which is the power source used in rah % 212E, Pages 3740. This appears to be a documentation dimorepency with no impact on the calculation's roeults, i

~ 3. The minimum volta 0s used for Motor Control Center 3EH8'MCC281 is 438 volts (Paes 391 but Attachmer4 A Paos -

Pmessimesio.mos a pay 3 or 7

..v - .-wo- 2.a,,.--4...-y-..-m-.-.,-%, . me,ww w - .--c.,,-w-, --m.---ee- e,, ,wy--,..-,-.w.*-. ,. - - - - . + ,,,--..e-sa, .---.---,+Sw,,.<<.sm, --iw-s -wr- e e.w.,,y-# in = .c w --

q I

~

Nwemastums.a ICAVP oR m oRaPws: l 88881***w unit a Discrepancy Report 72 of Calculat6on 212E lthan that the voNa0e used for )

3EHS*MCCSS1 should be 429 volts when evaluating Damper  !

o 3HVR'n40DeeB. This would have a reonooneervative efferi of reducin0 the voua0s W the damper's terminals.

c .

4. On Pa0e 30, the bus 40 neutral voka0e is shown as 112.34 l' s

volts for Panel SSCV'PNL9P, but N is shown as 112.33 vous on

\ Pape 40. This should be comded, but this has no impact on the roeuts of the calculation.

5. Pape 67 shows Circuit 11 as spare, but CW Une Diagram EE.

1CG (Rev. 22) and Calculation 154E (Rev.1, CCN 1) shows the s loads 38WP*8TR18 and SSWP*STR1D connected to this cirrit. This circuit and the effect of this load on the panel's v - ) should be analyzed.

b. ,he impedonoe of #12 AWG cable at 90 degrees C is shown in NUSCO Spec. SP-EE 260 as 2.2155 ohins per 1000 feet, but this coloulation has,used a value of 2.1515 ohms per 1000 feet throu0hout (e.g., Pa0es 19,20,22, etc.). Since this is a non-conservative ormr, the computations should be redone, i

1 C. Calculation 210E (CCN #1 Rev. 0)

1. Calculation 210E Pape SE shows thd, when evaluating Dempers 3HVR* MOD 28A and SHVR* MOD 46A, the vokage at Motor Control Center SEHS*MCCSA1 is 431 volts. However, Pa0*s 4RA and SSA show the volta 0s of Panel SSCV*PNL90 N 112.67 voks whloh is derived from a motor cordrol ceriter vong.e of 435 volts (Pape 45), not 431 vous. This leads to less <

conservative resuks. l

2. Calculation P.10E Pape 49A has omitted a routing poird.

Wiring Diagram EE 12F (Rev. 9) shows Cable 3HVRAOC225 lerminating W Jundion Box SJB*2519 (not at Jurdion Box 3J8*2507 as shown in the coloulation), but it also irdudes Cable 3HVRAPC224 (which is not shown in the colou!ation) as connected betwoon Junction Boxes 3J8*2519 and SJ8*2507.

Cable 3HVRAPC224 le 25 feet in length, has a Cable Mark Number of NHT 32, and is size #14 AWG, This additional ceNe will reduce the voua0e at the damper's terminals.

3. The installed length of Cable 3HVPSPC500 is shown as 8 fed long on Pape 82 and 9 feet long on Pa0s 77A.

4. Pa0e 91 shows Circuit 20 as spare, but One I ine Die 0 rem EE-1CC fiev. 31) and Calculation 154E shows loads (e.g.,

3RSS'LE2281) connected to this circuit. This circuit and the effect of this load on the panel's vota0e shrald be analyzed.

5. Circuit 20 of Panel SSCV*PNL90 indicates that the current is one emp for load SSWP*RlY00A, but Calculat6on 154E shows this load as 2 amos. The sopropriate calculation should be

.Ateed imos io se.no Au Paes 4or 7

1. dertheast utmele. ICAVP DRNo.DR M SS Milletone unit 3 Discrepancy Report  ;

revised to reRed the actualload current. Note: Using a 2 amp load would reduos the vokape at the load to 103 volts which still sationes the minimum alloweble volta 0e requirement of M volts.

6. On Pape 52A, the cable mark number shown for Cable ,

3HVRAOC674, Mark Number NHN-40, does not exist in the NU  !

Cable Database M3CBLRWY. The mark number for this cable, i accordin0 to M3C8LRWY, is NHN 48. The calculation should be revised to reRect the adual cobie installed. Note that the cable alze used in the computations Nees with the size in i M3CBLRWY (i.e., #14 AWG).  !

7, On Pape 78, the cable Mark Number NHT 77 (triplex $00 14CM) shown for Cable 38CVBPK045 does not agree with the '

mark number shown in MSCBLRWY which is NHP 82 (triplex M AWG). The calculat6on should be revloed to refled the actual cable installed. Note that the cable size used in the computations apress with the size in M3CBLRWV (l.a., M AWG).

8. Pa0e SSA 8teps 4 and 8 compute the circuit impedance by taking twios the cable lon0th. This is the way to corr.pute impedance for a sin 0le phabe circuR, however this is a three phase otroult and the circuit ;T+.t.er.06 for these steps is equal  :

to one times the cable length (Step 8 converts impedance to line.

to-line).

9. On Pa0e 76, the primary cable impedance is computed for a N AWG cable, but the cable is a N AWG cable. The impedance computations shown in Steps 3 and 6 should be deleted as Pape 76A now computes these values and, in effed, supersedes Pape 76.

D. Calculation 200E (CCN 82, Rev. 0)

1. In Caiculation 200E, the mirdmum volta 0e for Motor Control i

Center 3EHS*MCC1 A1 is shown as 432 volts in Stop 2 on Page 38 but is shown as 433 volts in Step 8 of Pape 38 and on Page 60 of Attachment A.

2. The voka0e drop is computed by Calcula60n 200E tor the circuit with the lon0est run from Junction Box 3J8*0600 to Dampers 3HVP'140D20A,3HVPWOD20C,3HVP* MOD 23A, and 3HVP* MOD 26A. Pa0s 30 uses the cable length of 90 feet for Damper 3HVP'WOD23A because k states that this damper has the lon0 eat citoult length. However, Attachmerd D (attached to tha*W 200E i as Paes 72) states that the length of Cable 3HVPAOC620 from Damper 3HVP* MOD 20A to Junction Box

3J8*0000 is 168 foot Since the lon0th of Cable 3HVPAOC520 i is lon0er than the cable from SJ8*0600 to Damper 3HVPWOD20A, Cable 3HVPAOC520 should be used.

Therefore, the resulting voitt0c drop of Caioulation 200E is not conservative. The offect of using 158 foot instead of 90 feet

! from Jundion Box 3J8*8600 to the dampers is that the damper .

l terminal vohaos is 107.0 volts instead of 108.7 volts. which is i PWeedifuss m3e Se AM Page 5 of 7 I

-,, , w ,_ , , , . . .._,.,.m_,. - _ . - .. ~ ,, ,,.m.- . . . . . _ ,

}

Netheast Uttenlos ICAVP M No MMT63 uisista= Unit 3 Discrepancy Report still above the mhnmum alloweble of 102 volts and is soceptable

3. The installed length of Cable 3HVRCOC510 is shown as 197 foot long on Pape 76 and 175 feet long on Pape 77.

4. Unlike calculations 212E and 210E, Calculation 200E does t not use the panel load from Calculation 154E but instead uses a ,

value Orester than the load in Calculation 154E but less than the ,

panel's stop4own transformer rating. Calculation 200E should state how the load value is determined (i.e., the basis), since K is a d6fferent percenta0e of the treneformer rating for the verlous '

panels.

5. There are several numoriool errors involving impedanoes and outronts in this calculation (as wuc as Calculations 210E and 212E). For example, on Pa0e 8 Miep 3, the primary impedance is computed as 0.2 ohms but should be 0.1 ohms (oonservative). Oil Pape 54, Circuit 32 shows the load as 5 amps, but it is shown in Calculation 154E as 0.5 amps (Calculation 200E is conservauve).

6. On Pape 36 Step 6, the circuit impedance is computed by taking twlos the cable length. This is the way to compute impedance for a sin 0le phase circuit, however this is a three phase circuit and the otroult impedance for Step 6 is equal to one times the cable length (8tep 8 converts impedance to line-to-line), in Step 8, the drop (4.16 emps times the impedance) should be multiplied by the square root of 3 (reference Pa0e 63 of Calculation 210E), in addition,in Step 4 the primary l.T@r.ce does not include the effect of the transformer boost when referring K to the soooW side of the transformer. In Stop 5 Line 3, the voltage 208 should be squared (It has been squared in the res town in Step 5, Line 4),

movkw Vend invahd Needed Date a

inilleter: Mendes. D. J. Q g 12m e7 VT Lead: Nort. Ardheny A - g O 12997 VT hegn scheper, Den K O O O 12/117 BRC Chmn: singh, Anand K O O O 1 ***

Dele:

IIWAllo:

Date:

ME80LiffloN' i/  ?, Identiced by Nu? O Vee @ No WonDieneepentCondalentU Yes @ No noemeenrenenerO v. @ me no.imiooun,eem .dt O v. @ No Retsow l om

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,3 meeeriae Na e messed VT Lead: Nort. Anmeny A D D D VT tagr: schepier, Den K 1RC Chmn: 04ngh. Anand K O b g

Date:

Printed 1/r/981/ 4002.W Pe0s 6 or 7

Nwtheast Umwee WAVP m m. m e m s:

mustaw ur* 3 Discrepancy Report  :

etcemenmes:

t i

I I

b i

l I

i 1

I i

l 1

i i

l 1

.l l

1 l

l Prwed im08104004 AM Page 7 of 7

Northeast utsties 6CAVP M No. DMPW64 M astern Ur* 3 D6screpancy Report j novtow ereup: opemens & Melrennense and Teatrg On VALB newtow stenism: opwetog Pioneen ,,,,,,, ,

O vee Oteerepeney Type: Teollrr y.- g 2, ^ - Osa NnC alentemenee tevel: 4 Date FW to DAi:

one puheehed:

r. l&C's Measurement & Test Equipmern used for Surveillance Testing not Property Documented.

D= ort,#en: OPS Forrn 3009.9 2, Quarterly QSS Valve Stat >ke Test, OPS Form 3609.9-3 & 4, Quarterly QS8 Valve Stroke surveillance--

Train A & 8 have a "N/A' typed on their roepective page 1's  :

under the headings of ' Tost Equipment Type', 'QA Number', and

' Cal Due D.We'. As these are Todi Spec Surveillances, the information for the test equipment used for these tests wodd seem to bo a requirement for accuracy, traceability, trending, etc.

It should be noted that a cursory review of other OPS Fonns ,

shows that *N/A' may have been typed in the above mentioned fields on more than the olled Forms. Therefore, it should be noted that this item of this Discrepancy could affect more than timith; with stopwatches, at;d more than just Operations Surveillance 4, nev6ew vond invand Newted oste inumen unseren,n- 0 0 O in/iae7 vf L=d: men. Ken O O O $2 s e7 12/23,7 vT mer: schepeer,oen x 0 0 0 wie Ceo= n,h, Anand x 0 0 0 12/85d'7 oeu wyAtm Date:

nEtoLUTioN:

Previously identined by Nu? O vos @ No NonObsesepentCondn6en?Q vos @ No needumenPendinerO vm @ no ne=amenunr=wvedtO va @ No moview m; "~, Not ? : , ^ ^ Needed Date vT Leed; Seas, Ken O O O VT Mgr schopfer, Don K O O O WIC Clenn: singh, Anand K onto:

aL Conenente:

PMead 1/7Als 104tl2s AM Page 1 of i

_ . - . _ , _ _ _ _ ~_ _.. _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . __ _ . . . -

.r' ICAVP DR No. DR.MP3-0766 Northead Utilities Mis 6 stone Ur* 3 Discrepancy Report Revww aroup: syewm onVAuo Revww FJament: syneem Design

,,,,,,,,g,,,,,,,,,,,,

D6uipane: Elsteleel Desi'"

, Type: %%

O vee C1 - ,

gg 3, .- m N/A NRC Sientacents lovel: 3 Done faxed to NW:

pesePubnehed:

~

Discrepeacy: Documentation of Safety Related MCC and TOL settings Descripeen:

Background:

Page 8.5 24, Saction 8.3.1.1.4 of the FSAR states:

The magnet!c element setpoint must be greater than motor locked-rNor current but less than the thermal limit of the overload heater.

The contactor overload heaters for continuous duty safety related motors are selected well above rated motor nameplate full load current....

Page 8.3 25, Section 8.3.1.1.4 of the FSAR states:

The nonmotor loads fed from these motor control centers are proteded by molded case circuit breakers. These breakers are equipped whh thermal elements to provide overload or low current fault protection and magnetic elements to provide severe short circuh protection. The setting of the thermal element is l

selected above the circuit full load current and the pickup of this element is nonadjustable.

As part of the ICAVP review a request for clarification of Appendix J of SP-M3-EE 321 was issued. NU's response, M3-l lRF-00740 states:

l Currently TOLs and breaker trip settings are con. rolled by the procedures in SP-EE-076, section 2, Appendix 2A. There is no one drawing or document where every TOL and breaker size is located."

Discussion:

l The FSAR states bounding conditions for setting molded case breakers and thermal overloads. SP M3-EE-321 defines how to set these breakers and overloads, but because we could not locate documentation of the actual setting of the equipment we could not confirm that the proper breakers and overloads settings l were, in fact, installed, l

Our inabilL'y to confirm breaker sizes and settings also impacted a calculation review (Calculation No.12179-GM-60.03-848CA) of the trip settings for the circuit breakers installed between 480V SrJr 32T Compt 32T4-2 and conssponding MCC 3EHS*MCC1 A.

PrMed 1/Mie 10256 AM PeGe 1 or 2

.-- .- - ..- . _ - . - . _ . . . - . .- .- - - ._~. . ~_

x.

.- m ,, m mAyp DR No. DRW84765 umetone unit 3 Discrepancy Report Having confirmed that the proper time characteristic curve was used for the 440V MCC main feed breaker, we tried to confirm that the largest downstream MCC foW breaker ooord6 nates -

with the MCC main feed breaker.

The one line diagram for MCC 1 A1, D;; ming EE.1 AK, Rev. 27 Note 5 states:

"The feeder breakers shown are Gould 100A frame type HE43.

The W ahia replacements for ticse breakers are Glemens 125A frame HED43 per R1E 95 0243. The drawing may not reflect the adual installed breaker frame. For the actual installed breaker, refer to PMMS and perform a field verification."

L The drawing shows that there are 150A frame breakers installed in MCC1 A1. In sooordance with note 5 a review was made of PMMS to try to verify the largest breaker within MCC 1 A1. No information was listed in PMM8 with regard to the specifx:

breaker types and sizes.

Conclusion:

There is presently no documentation avaliable for confirming, and verifyin0 the information aGainst calculations, of the sizes and settings for the entire population (including the equipment l' within the scope of ICAVP review) of safety related molded case

circuit breakers and TOLs. A program exists for incorporating the l information into 8P-EE-076, section 2, Appendix 2A, but the program only includes the 89-10 prograrn MOV TOLs.

noview Vand Inveed Needed Date initiekr. Womer,l. 12M97 Q Q VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O tasero7 l- VT Mgr: achopfer, Den K -

O $2itiair WIC Chmn: airgh, Anand K m g 1 S 96 l

Dele:

mAuo:

m:

MaSOLUTIoN:

provtously identined by NUT Q Yes @ No Noh Diesfepent Condellen?Q Yes @ No no hmiennenenetO vos @ No - unr.o.sv.dt O v.e @ N.

L _

Accepsable Not Accepleide M Date m gn,,,)

VT Lead: Nort. Anthony A VT Men schepeer. Den K O O O WIC Chmn: Sergh, Anand K l o. ,

SL Convnends:

Preited 1/1/9810:41:o1 AM Pese 2 or 2 l

l

I Northeast utWtles ICAVP DR No. M 44P34764 mmetme ur*

• Discrepancy Raoort moview eeny: synom OnvAuD newtow Elemem: apetem Degn Diselpane: semmhni De*"

O yes E . - li Type: Caledden g systemereesse: Hvx NRC signiseenee level: 3 Date FAXad to NU-Date Puhashed* 1M098

- -,. Duct Support Calculation Discrepancy Deeegtion: We have reviewed the Duct Support Calculation no. NP(F)-

Z507A 123,Rev.1.

Based upon this review,we have noted tie following discrepancy:

The calculauon NP(F) Z507123 has been revised to address the deleuon of support DSA no.124.

The original analysis has been based on the assumption that the applied lateral loads will be equally distributed on two supports:

DSA no.123 and DSA no.124. Deletion of the support DSA no.

124 will result in the full load distribution on the only remaining support DSA no.123.Therefore,the applied lateral loads on the support DSA no.123 will double.The latest revision of the calculation has not reflected 100% load distribution on the support DSA no.123 and is still based on the on0inal 50% load distribution input.

Preliminary review has determined that revised 100% load distribution will result in overstrees condition in two welded connections addressed on papes 17 & 18 of the subject .

calculation.

nev6ew Vaud invalid Needed Date

initiater

leefc. N -

O $2/ ism 7 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A -

0 2/1ss7 lac h"=: k b O 2/3 Date:

MM:

Date:

RESOLUTION.

T.4.~ ~ W Hensleed by NUT U Yes @ No Non Oteerspent Condalen?O Yes (9) No neeshmeaP=enetO va @ No -unreemedtO va @ No ne*,

m,g We Not W m hJ Date VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A VT higr: schopfer, Den K O S IRC Chmn: Singh. Anand K O

l Dece:

t st Comments:

Prmied 1/7481041:30 AM Pe0s 1 er 1

Northeast Utmek. IC VP M No. MMS 4764 M metorm ut* 3 Discrepancy Report-newtow aroup: sysem DRVAuD WW Potenties operehany lenue Daseipens: Emeermental ouesnochen g y, F , :p Type: N%

syewemese: N/A Ow-NRC signiacense level: 3 Date faxed to NU-Date Puteshed.1/1o98 C. F. Class 1E Cable Testing Dacrtpeten: The review orthe Equipment Qualification (EQ) Isomedix Test Report No. 315-03, Rev. O, dated March 1975 for the ITT Control -

Cables Model No. Exane 11 Gray (SIS) Inside the containment of Millstone, UnM 3 shows that the type testin0 did not include Rame Testing of the cables ss required by Section 2.5 of IEEE 383-1974.

In this section, the testing of cables shall include Vertical tray flame test to determine the cable's ability to rc.sist potential fire in the plant.

Also, the loomedix test repon did not include the list of test equipment (meters, voltmeters, etc.) that were used during EQ testing.

Per IEEE 323-1974, Sedion 6.3.1.4, it is stated that the EQ testing shall be conducted by test equipment, which shall be calibro sed a0minst auditable calibration standards and shall have documentation to support such calibration.

Review

Vand inveihi raseded Date inllister

Yeeein, s. O O O 12rioo7 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A y Q Q 12/1647 VT ligr: schopfer, Don K G O O 12t2297 IRC Chmn: Singh. Anand K y Q Q 12/31/97 Date:

WWALD:

Date:

REscumoN.

Pradouety identelled by NU? O Yes (9) No NeaDesesepentCondeten?Q Yes (9) No P+PenenetO va @ No RemunreseevedrO Ya @ No Review m ""T'm Not AWh W Date VT Laod: Neri, Ardhony A VT Mgr: schopfer, Don K b IRC Chsun: singh. Anand K Date:

sL Commente:

Pnnled im0610:42-01 AM Pe0s 1 of 1

l Northear UtWties ICAVP DR No. DR#P34745 l M astorm u'* 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Opershone & MeHerurce end Teneng DRVAUD Potential opereheny leeue Diecipens: Opwebens

' .:p Type: 0 & M & T Procedure O va 8, _ .

g

.SWP NRC W M :4 Dels faxed to NU:

Date PuWiehed 1/1o96 06scapency: Procedure revisions required by def.ign change are not complete. 1 Dacrip#aa' PDCR# MP3-86-017, page 10 requires revisions to Op Forms 3326-9 and 3326-10, Revision 4, Change No.1 following completion of plant design change to include the new valves.

PDCR closure Memo dated March 26,1996 also states that the OPS Forms Revision 4, Change 1 were revised and approved by PORC on 3/8/96. f. review of revision 5 (Sff, Gt3/97) to the l aforementioned OPS Forms discloses that only one valve in each train was added, *V685 for A Train (OPS Form 3326 9) and j

• V688 for B Train (OPS Form 332610). Valves *V682 (A Train) and *V683 (B Train) were omitted. This omission is a descrepancy.

Review i Velld invaded Needed Date  ;

initiator: Temlyn, T.an , 12/17/97 l

VT Land: Bees, Ken G O 52/iss7 I VT Mgr: schopfer, Don K @ Q 12/2:b97 IRC Chnte: Singh, Anand K O O O i2/31/97 ,

l Dm: i mnm j Date:

RESOLUTION:

7.;/ r_^?;identNied try NU7 O Yes @ No Non C--_, M CamJIlion?Q Yes @ No

- penme70 va @ u. - unr=

• ed7 0 vos @ wo  !

R. view I e neiAccepte

• weseed Da

,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,3 VT Laod: Bees, Ken O O ,

VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K (

IRC C8 van: singh, Anand K Date:

SL Commente:

Printed imD810 42-27 AM Page1or 1 l

Northeast Utilities BCAVP DR k DRW34773 mintorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report nev6ew aroup: Preremmeho DR VAUD Revtow teement: Change Process Deneipsne:Ia C Onion F  ;- :p Type: NW O va gg 4, f _ ^ _  : DGX NRC signinconee levet: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Putdlehed- 1/1o96 F-~ ; ~ :i. Inconsistent setpoint change design input data D=ceipthm Setpoint calcul6 tion SP-3EGF-6, Rev2, calculates the low level setting for Instruments 3EGF LS291 A & B. The design input data used to determine the setting based upon the percent of span is different from the data used in the modification implementing document DCR-547. The process spanning differences results in two different calibrated voltage settings.

This is a discrepent condition since the setpoint calculation is the supporting document referenced in the design change request.

R. view vesd invesd No.ded Date initiator: Domtmveld, Jim -

O $2r2247 VT Leed: Ryan, Thomme J B O $2/22m7 VT Mgr: Schopfer, Den K B D 0 $2/23s7 1RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Q Q 12/3147 Date:

m AuD:

Date:

RE40LUTI004:

Previously idenillhd by NU7 O Yes @ No NonDiecrepentCondition?Q vos @ No

~% Penene?O v. @ No ~%unroe*ed?O va @ N.

Review Wh Dkt Wh Needed Date VT Lead: Ryan, Themse J O O VT Mgr schopfer DenK O O G IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:

st Commente:

Prned 1/7 Ale 10 42.53 AM Page 1 of 1

Northeast utsties ICAVP DR No. DRW34774 Mastone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review eeoup: system DR VAun Review Elemoed: System Design Diool ane: N Dwign P

O v.

Discrepomy Type: Calcutellon g S, _ _^. ': QSS NRC aigniacense W: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Putdlehed 1/1o96 r . :6 Top of ECCS Sud60n on the RWST Ductipelen: FSAR Floure 6.34 Indicates that the top of the ECCS suc' ion from the RWST is 4'4" above the bottom of the tank. This is inoonsbtent with the design drawings of the RWST.

Drawings 12179-EP 111M-8 and 2214.601-023-001R indicate that the 24-inch diameter ECCS suction line,3-SIL 024152, conneds with the RWST at a centerline elevation of 4'-6' above the bottom of the tank. Thus the top of the ECCS suction from the RWST is approximately 5'4' above the bottom of the tank.

Review Vaud invalid Needed Date inlitator: Walesiend,J.F. -

0 12tisis7 VT t.eed: Nort, Anthony A . 12/1697 VT Mgt: Schopfer, Den K -

0 0 2rzas7 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Q Q Q 12/31/97 Oste:

WWAUD:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

Previously talentleed boy Nu? O vos @ No Non E:_ ; " Condit6on?O vos (@ No PM% PendinetO vos @ No - % unremesvedr O vos @ No Review I Wa Not A -- ~ " . Needed Date VT Leed: Nort, ANhony A VT Mer: Souper, Don K O O O IRC C=nn: see, Anand K Dele:

SL Commente:

l l

l 1

l l

at

, Noetheast utstie. ICAVP DR No DR4PW77 l Mmetone ur* 3 Discrepancy Report Revtow Grong: Opereuune & Melrdenence and Tosen0 DR VAUD Review Weement: Opereung Procedwo O von Discrepancy Type: Procedure .y.

g s, _f. - 7 N/A NRC sigmacance M 4 Date faked to Nu:

Date Putdished 1/1066 F . cia MANAGEMENT'S EXPECTATIONS NOT CONVEYED DURING STATION STAND-DOWN Descripehm: The Station Stand-Dcwn, held on 10/29/g7, concoming the use, compliance to , and Management's Expedations of DC 4

' Procedural Compliance", was observed. This Discrepancy consists of two parts: the first concoming the presentation handout and the second concoming the actual presentation and follow-up discussion.

PART1 Management's Expectations as stated in the Handout were,

• Each Individual shall stridly adhere to established Station policies, programs, and procedures...', " Personnel shall not give directions, guidance, or clarification which conflict with approved procedures.', and "A procedure shall be used for the specific tasks or evolutions it was written to perform".

Under the heading, "What is required when it is necessary to skip steps in a Continuous or General LOU procedure", the handout states:

I d. ENSURE omitting the step does not affect the following:

Change the intended objective or the task or evolution as specified by the procedure Create an unsaie plant condition Violate Technical Specifications or Technical Requirements Manual Result in a deviation from requirements in a License-j l Basis Document (CommMments) l e. IF any of the items in step D. are affeded, Go to DC 1,

' Administration of Procedures and Forms,' and INITIATE a procedure modification.

f. IF none of the Rems in step d. are affeded, DOCUMENT reason for omitting step (s) using one or more of the following l methods:

If performance verification is required, directly in the documerd at the applicable page and step

- Operations Department Shift Log DC 4-1 Form AWO it does not appear that a prooses is provided to screen changes to vertfy and document the need fore a 50.5g review. Without this procees, Managements Expedations will not be met and it could lead to Abuse of DC 4,

• Procedural Compliance *.

L Pnnled 1/7A3810:4152 AM Pope 1 of 2 I

ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0777 :

,, met Uumes i

' Mino6ene unit 3 Discrepancy Report PART2 The Station Stand 4own presordation observed was given by a Shift Manager (SM). The SM dW not have the necessary insight to ensure that Management's Expedations were being delivered. His presentation and dialogue with the operators on his shift indicated that the same, causal, non-profesWenal, i businesa as-usual attitude would meet Management's Expedations. He conveyed this attNude by the following paraphrased statements-

1. I will take responsibility for ...as long as we know wtere we are taking the plant.

2. The SM wel make the call and you are covered. I think that this is the interd of this procedure.

3. We skip steps all the time. If we cent do that wa would not be able to get anything done.

4. If there is no intent change, then the change can be dono in the Contro! Room.

Management revised DC 4. ' Procedural Compliance', in order to most industry standards regarding procedure compliance. From the above observations, l' is evident that DC 4. ' Procedural Compliance *, has been abucal in the past by Senior Shift i Management and others, and that this practice will probably continue. With the lack of a screening process for 50.59's and the lack of understanding of DC 4," Procedural Compliance *, by Managemord Personnel, it is unlikely the Managemerd's Expectations will be meet, nom.

vand twend Needed Date inleiseen unseren.R. O 12/17/97 v7 Lead: sese, Ken g O 12tta/97 vi Men sone,an, o.n x -

D 12r23s7 inc cienn: sinen, Anans x G O O 12/si/97 Date:

mow Date:

nEtoLimcN:

7.. A Zr, Identened by Nu? O Yee @ No NonDiessepentCondalen?Q vos @ No noseausenPenen 70 v. @ we neemmenu==**d70 vos @ we newtow lemmaar: (none) v7 Lead: sese, Mm O O G VT Men schopfer, Den K O O O WIC Clenn: sineh, Anand K Date:

alComanente:

Prmind 1/7/9510:4335 AM Pese 2 or 2 l

, . , - . .~ . _ , . _, _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. . . . . - . . _ - . . -..a. ,_. - -_- , . . . - - _ - .- -- , , . .

1 \

l Northeast utsties . ICAVP DR No. DR44P3 4778 No'w unit 3 Discrepancy Report Iwvbw ow, system OnVAuD i lhvhw thment: system ossion i Discipens: Environmnerdel Quebflesho" F , -i Type: %% O v.

s- ..J N/A g j i -._ 7  ;

NRC W imi:4 Date FAKM to NO: '

Laste Putdinhed: 1/1o96 F. -i; Equipmert Qualification MaWor List (EQML) discrepancy '-

E . EEQ TRA 105.7, Rev. 0, dated May 4,1994 is the Electrical i Equipmert Test Report Assessment of Raychem Report No.

58722 5 for the qualification of WCSF 50-N Shim Stock located ,

inside Millstone Unit 3 cordainment.

The shim stock is used as a shim to build up diameters of small wires to a level within the use of Roychem's other nuclear grade low volta 0e products.

The review shows that this item, along with the corresponding Test Report Assessment is not included in the EQML.

However, the EEQ Pro 0rsm Manual, Rev.1, Page 13, Section 4.1.4 states that : "EQML document includes safety related elodric equipment essential to emergency reactor shutdown, cordainment isolation, reador core cooling, containment and reactor heat removal, or is otherwise essential in preventing significant release of radioactive material to the environment.'

newtow Valid invaud Needed Dele intelator: venein, s. O O O 2rtis7 V7 Land: Nerl, Anthony A O O O i2rie<97 VT Mgr: schopier, Den K O O O 12r2397 IftC Chmn: stregh, Anand K Q Q Q 12/3157 Dele:

INVAUD:

Date:

nEsOLuTioN:

N/: _ --, Identined by Nu? Q Yee @ No Non Dieorepent Condition?Q Yes (G) No mp.nanetO va @ N. n=* tun u==*.dtO va @ No n.wi

", Not M- , ' Needed Date VT Laod: Nort Anthony A vT Mer: schapeer, Den x wiC cham: sinah, Anand x 0 0 Q 0 0 Date:

SL Commente-Printed imB610 48.50 AM Page 1 or 1

Northeast Umme. ICAVP DR No. DR6779 u mstone unn 3 Discrepancy Repost newesw aroup: systen onvaun

""""''""D"'8" potenties opereutty su.

@ Yes oMere =rTree:ce=ime" O No e, f - - - : N/A Nhc signeteense twel: 3 Date faxed to Nu:

Date PuWhehed.1/1046 Obserepancy: Class 1E Cable Qualified to DOR Guidelines 0=ceiption: The review of Electrical Equipmert Qualification (EEQ) Test Report Assessment No. EEQ-TRA-107.1 shows that Kerite Company's TPNS Jacketed Pwer Cab 6es Model J/C 750 MCM, 5KV, Plant I.D. 3VARIOUS 10 (1), is qualified to the Division of Reactors (DOR) Guidelines.

However, Millstone FSAR Section 3.118.2.2 states that the Environmental Qualification of all safety-related equipment shall meet the requirements of IEEE 323-1974, the Intent of NUREG-0588, and NRC 10CFR 50.49.

Also, Wyle qualification test report No,471761, Rev. O, dated March 23,1984 did not address the synergistic effects as  ;

required in FSAR Section 3.118.2.2, NRC 10CFR 50.49(e)(7),

and R.G.189, Rev.1, S*dion C.5.a.

The synergistic effeds that should be addressed durin0 the equipment qualification are the dose rate effects and the effects resulting from the d6fferent sequence of applying radiation and (elevated) temperature on the equipmert qualified life, newtow vand invand needed oste l

Inilleber: Yeeein, s. Q Q Q 12/1747 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A -

O O $2tir/o7 l

VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K -

O 12/2 w 7 Inc Chmn: singh, Anand K G O O $2tatio7 l

Date:

IBNALID:

Date:

NEacLUTtoN:

~

]

Previously leonetend by Nut Q Yes (9) No Non Discrepent Condition?Q Yes (9) No )

-renenetO v. @ No nemensenunreseearirO Y= @ No i neview l i Inittster: (none) )

VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O - 1 VT Mgr: schepeer, Don K Inc Chan: singh. Anand K I

Date:

at.Cornments: l l.

l Pnniedimes1ow4e AM Page i or i I

1

... . - . - . . - . . . = - . - . . .

_ _ _ . . - ~ . . _ _ _. _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Northeast Utledes ICAVP_ DR No. DR MP3 0780 Misietone Unit 3 DiscrepancS Report l Rwtow aroup: system omVAuo j Rwesw mesmens: system Desip P' Erwimnmnantel ouslWloshen g y,, ,

niesawo-r type: %

syseenWevooses: N/A o u, j NRC signiseence level: 3 Does faxed se NU:

Date Puhilshed: 1/1W96 ,

" io Class 1E Cabie Toming D6screpancy l

Daaripeien: The Equipment Qualification (EQ) test report for Kertte Control Cables with FR ll Insulated / and FR Jacketed Control Cables is De loomedix Report No I-R978-03, Rev. 3, dated Sept.1978,*

Environmental Exposure of Control Cables for Kertte Co.'.

The test report and the correspondirig Test Report Assessment No. EEQ TRA.107.7 show that the cables did not undergo Flame Testing.

However, MillWone FSAR Sedion 8.3, page 8 3.26 states that:

All Class 1E Cables are type tested in accorcance with IEEE 383 1974 to ensure their ability to perform their intenced functions.

Section 2.5 of IEEE 3831974 describes the acceptable methods for type testing of Class 1E Cables via the vertical tray flame test to determine their relative ability to resist fire.

Review vond invalid Needed Dale initiater: Yemein, S. @ 12/11/97 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A Q Q Q 12/1697 VT Mer: Schapler, Den K O O 12/23/97 IRC Chmn: sinsh, Anand K G O 12/31/97 Dele:

INVALE:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

.% /: z';idoneland by NUF Q Yes @ No Non oleerepent Condu6on?U Yes~d No meendinstO Y. @ No -un, *edtO Ya @ No Rev6ew Accepteele Not Acceptabh Needed Date VT Lead: Nort, Amhany A VT Mer: Schapler, Don K IRC Chmn: singh, Anand K O b Date-sL Conenente:

Printed 1/7/9610:5o:22 AM Page 1 or 1

l Northeast utilities ICAVP m m. mm781 Misistorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report I amm newtow aroup: sysism DRVAuD Movtsp tiement: system Design Diecipene: Mechar*si Deels" O von Descrepancy Type: Compenant dele gg synnenwerocese: Ras NRC signelleense level: 3 Date faked to NU:

Date puidlehed: 1/1098 Discrepancy: Inconsistency betwn design spec & calc fw max daff press for RSS motor operated valves Desertption: 3RSS*MOV20A,B,C,0 Specification 2382.200184 Revision 1 shows the maximum design differential pressure for valves 3RSS*MOV20A,B,C,0 to be 275 paid. However, calculation CRS-MOV 1382-M3 Revision 0 identifos the maximum differential pressure to be 295 psid based on the containment recirculation spray pump shutoff head, 3RSS*MOV38A,B Specification 2282.050-878 Revision i shows the maximum design differential pressure for valves 3RSS*MOV38A,B to be 275 paid. However, calculation CRS-MOV-1382 M3 Revision 0 identifos the maximum differential pressure to be 295 paid based on the contair nont recirculation spray pump shutoff head.

3RSS*MOV8637A,B & 3RSS*MOV8838A,B Specification 2282.050-878 Revielon 1 shows the maximum )

design differential pressure for valves 3RSS*MOV8837A,B & '

3RSS*MOV8838A,B to be 800 paid However, calculation CRS- )

MOV 1382-M3 Revision 0 identifes the max!rrum differential pressure to be 626 paid based on the residuel heat removal pump shutoff head.

Newlew l veed inveed Nee ed none Instleter: Feingold, D. J.

@ t2/12S7 l

VT Lead: Nort, Anthony ^ O O $2riea7 VT Mgr Schopfer, Den K O O O i2i23s7 IIRC Chan: singh, Anand K O O O 12tatie7 Date:

INVAUD:

Date:

MEsOLUTloN:

7...  ?;identleed try NU7 O vos @ No Non I ~ ,--[Condtlion? Q vos @ No m eenene?O vos @ No neesiuunu eenved?O vos @ No movie. l Prtnted im9e 10 Sc 54 AM Pape 1 or 2

l ,

o Northeast UtWties ICAVP M No. Mh781 Meet <m Unit 3 Discrepancy Report inlaister (none)

VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A L O O YT Mgri Schopfer, Don K O g IRC Ceuun: Singh, Anand K , g Date:

SLCensneds:

Printed 1/1/9810:5056 AM Pep 2 of 2 4

i KAVP DR No. DRMT82 mest umme.

Mastone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report ^

i l

noview anne: syneen onvaun j moview asemese eyeiwn Desir , % ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

i osseiyane: I a e o"*"

Om  !

Diemepeasy Type: oro*w gg i s, r . :Dax i NRC signiheense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

osas puhashed. Inoss piecroponer. Drawing Discrepancy- LSK 24 9,4C, Rev 8 De*artpelen: Back0round:

The log 6c diagram shows that Containment Recirculation Valve 3RSE*MV8837A OR Safety injedion Valve 3SILWV8804A must be open to enable the sequencer to initiate a SIS RECIRC MODE SIGNAL and a CDA RECIRC MODE SIGNAL Discrepancy:

Emergency Operating Procedure EOP 35 ES 1.3, Transfer to Cold Leg Recirculailon, Rev. 8 indicates that both 3RSS*MV8837A AND 3SIL*MV8804A are opened during the transfer to cold leg recirculation. This conflicts with the logic described in the back0round above.

In addition, Elementary Diagram ESK 6NF, Rev 13 shows an interlod that prevents 3SIL*MV8804A from opening until 3RSSHV8837A is fully open, This conflids with the lo01c described in the back0round above.

Additional Ermrs:

The signal from the final OR gate to the CDA RECIRCULATION MODE SIGNAL resultant is inputted tw6ce; once to initiate the CDA RECIRCULATION MODE SIGNAL through a retentive memory device; also to inhibit the CDA RECIRCULATION MODE SIGNAL throu0h a NOT Cate; these two signals are mutually exclusive.

The SIS RECIRCULATION MODE SIGNAL output interface number 43 should be revised to road; LSK-24-9.40, E, G, J, K.

M, Q, T (28723 sh 4, 5,7,9,10,12,15,18).

The CONTAINMENT DEPRESSURIZATION ACTUATION output interface number 42 should be revised to road; LSK 9.4D - K, M - R, T U, W - Y (28723 sh 4 - 10,12 - 18,18,19, 21 - 23)

The output fmm SIS RECIRCULATION MODE SIGNAL should r be 1,Wed to the NOT gate mentioned above to prevent a CDA RECIRCULATION MODE SIGNAL and u SIS RECIRCUL.ATION MODE SIGNAL from being initiated at the same time, Escutcheons are missino for the follow 6n0*

1. SIS Test Switch

2. CDA Test Switch

.m, ..m,__

mm

' ' ' ' ~ ' ' "

~~

Pnnled im9s 10.5122 AM Paes 1 of 2 l

, ,.e. , . - n ,. . - .- - - _- . , - - - -- --

1 1

ICAVP M No.DR M W 8[

Northeast UWWes M meterm Ur* 3 Discrepancy Report l

4. SIS, CDA To Rooire Roset Switeit )

• l vand invahd Needed Date  ;

innester: Ptnelas, H. . g 12/1747 l 12/1947 VT Land: Neri, Anthony A - Q -0 O 12/2w7 VT tegr schepeer, Den K O O $ 2/8'*7 IRC Chmn: Shgh, Anand K O O u )

Date:

DNALID: l Date:

RESOLIJ110N:

7F./-_f, klonellied by Nur V Yes @ No 'SA Deserepent CondillentQ Yes @ No M% Pending70 v @ N. ~ % un, oiv.d7 0 vos @ No Revlow awe Not Acceptable Needed Date W . (none)

VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O VT uer: Schapler, Don K g g IRC Chmn: Singh. Anand K O O Date:

SL Conenente:

1 i

l l

l l'

l i

i f

\

Printed 1/74810.5126 AM page 2 of 2

ICAVP DR No. DR44P3-0784 -

Northeast utsties motorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report -  !

Review aroup: system DavAuD

• "WW potential opweMmey leeue l Olmespane: Mechanical Desig" O va Deerrepency Type: Compenard Date gg evetenWpveceae: Qss NRC signNicena level: 3 Date faxed to NU:

Date Published.1/1046 F m inconsistency between spec 2472.110-185 & calc NM-027 ALL w/ respect to 3QS8'AOV27A,8 stroke time.

D a cirosa: DesiO6 specification 2472.110185 Revision 1 identifies the stroke time for air operated valves 30SS*AOV27A and SQSS*AOV278 as 3/16 inches per second. Aooording to the plant computer data base, PDDS and PMMS, and drawing 2472.110185 340 Revision C these valves are nominally 12 inches in size. This is equivalent to approximately 64 seconds for the 12 inch valve. Accordin0 to calculation NM-027-ALL Revision 2, the required stroke time is 25 seconds. The 25 second stroke time requirement in the calculation is based on limiting the potential level loss in the refueling water stora0e tank (RWST) via the non-safety related portion of the RWST cooling subsystem subsequent to a safety injection signal. The stroke time in the specification is hi0her than the stroke time required by the calculation.

R. view weed invend Needed Done innister: Feinpaid. D. J. O O O 2/i2s7 VT l.eed: Nort, Anthony A O O O 2 ties 7 VT Mgr: schepeer, Den K O O O 12t2ss7 IRC Chne: singh, Anand K Q. O O 1204s7 I

Date:

INVAUD:

Date:

REaOLUTioN:

7.3 ";idenused by Nut Q ves @ No NonDiscrepentCendlitentQ vos (#) No Rosemmienponene70 va @ No Reesiumen une=*ed70 va @ No I

Review AP Not AecepteMe Needed Date m,g VT Leed: Nerl. Anthony A O O O VT Mgr: Schepfer, Den K IRC Chnet: Singh, Anend K O O l Date:

sL Commente: l I

I l

PrWed II7m810:51:54 AM PeGe 1 or 1 i

l

ICAVP DR No. DR.MP34783 Northeast Utmues metone Unit 3 Discrepatscy Report Revtow Group: sych m DRVAUD Rwww twnsat: system Desir ,%

Demolytne: AvuoturalDesi'"

Descapeney Type: Damien cerwei Pramhn O va

@ No s, w. wA NRC Sqpenoenee twel: 4 Date faxed k NU:

Date Pubnehed: 1/1096 Demeepency: Design Procedure Discrepancy D a eriyeon: We have reviewed the Millstone Unit 3 NETM 41(Rev.1, dated May3.1965)

• Procedure for the Qualification and Cataloguing of the Embedded Plates with HeMed Anchors".

Based upon this review we have noted the following discrepancy:

Ort page # 7 of the above procedure the constant used in the expression for the tension capacity of the stud is inconectly shown as follows:

Pue = 0.255 As fy....... 0bs).

The correded constant in the expression should read as:

Pue = 0.225 As fy....... 0bs). This is also corroborated in a solved example as shown on pa0e #1 of 8.

Review Velid inveHd Needed Date indelstor: Kleie, N O O i2/12/e7 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A @ Q Q 12/1647 VT Mgr: schopfer, Don K -

0 12/23G7 IRC Chmn: Singh. Anand K @ Q 12/31/97 Date:

WWALID:

Date:

RESOLUTION, MM;identelled 19 NU7 U vos (9) No NonDiecrepentCondItion?O vos (G) No

-Pe enerO va @ No --- um=*edtO va @ No Revt.w

"f'*h Not A~agidda= Needed Date m,g VT Lead: Nort, Amhany A D D G VT Mgr: Schopfer. Don K b 1RC Chmn: 50% Anand K Date:

st Comments:

Pnnled 1/1/9610:52:23 AM Page 1 of 1

Northeast Utilities ICAVP M No. M N 784 ,

Mislatorm unit 3 Di' crepancy Repoft )

l Noview Group: system DaVAUD m anenen: syenom D=e ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, , , .

Dissipane: DestricalDesig" O va Discrepency Type: N% gg s, _ .  : N/A NRC signissense level: 3 Deh faxed to Nu:

Date puWiehed.1/1048 Disorepancy: Value used for motor cordribution to fault is not referenced.

(Calculation 123E).

D*eatp#aa: This calculation determines the minimum 1000 V power cable sizu under fault conditions. The cak.ulation assumes a motor contribution to the fault of 2500 kVA but does not provide the basis for this assumption, in determinin0 motor contribur lon for a fault, industry standards su00est 3.6 times full load current for induction motors and 4.8 times full load current for synchronous motors. The basis for the 2500 kVA short circuit motor contribution should be provided.  ;

neview vand invand Needed Date Ininetor: Crockett. Ed. O O O 2/12/s7 VT Lead: Neri, Ardhony A y [ Q 12/1897 VT Mgr: Schapfer, Don K G O '2t23s7 O 12/3147 INC Chan: singh, Anand K -

O Date:

INVAUD:

=

Pete:

nEsOLttrION:

M/ _ _ _'-, identised by Nut O vos @ No Non EP- ;-- ' CondiNon?U ves @ No p%ponene70 va @ No neemmenunr 470 vas @ No

n. view AseepteWe Not W e Needed Date l mg '

• VTLead: Nort, Anthony A VT Mgr: schapser, Don K O O O O g inc cann: sinen. Anand K g Date:

SL Comnante: ,

I I

I l

1 I

i Printed 1/rA1610t52-50 AM . Pa08 1 of 1 l

l  !

1 l

l

Northeast utmeio. ICAVP DR No DR 44P3489 Museotw unit 3 Discreparu:y Report Movtow ereup: syonem -laVAuo Matow Blona.e: syneem Desip otselpane: Enumini 0"*"

, m O vee F_ . i Type: t *W syeaanWPr eens: Dox gg NRC signescense level: 3 Date FMed le pal:

m Puedished: 12/1/9e

~

m oti Discrepencies involvie,01TOTW Persel calculations 151E, 154E,182E, and 211E E R. A. Calcekdion 15tE (CCN #6, Rev.1)- VBA Panel Leading

1. Nges 4,43,82, and 110 of Calculation 15111 show the voMage of the regulatin0 transfurmers as 480-240/120 voP.4.

This assagrees wMh the One Line Diagram EE 1BA (rev. 21) which shows the younge of these transformers as 480120 volts, Calculation 151E needs to be revised. This discrepancy has no impad on the results of this calculation.

2. The load on Circut #3 of VRal Bus Panel 3A (Page 100) is incorrect. Item C rnultiplies 3 lights by 5 VA pa light and arrives at 10 VA, not 15 VA. The load of Circuit #6 should be 65 VA, not 60 VA, which causes the load on Papes 82 (Circuit #1) and 94 (Circuit #6) to be 2496 VA instead of 2491 VA and the total

[ Panel 3VSA*PNL-VB3 load on Page 82 to be 6001 VA tristead of 5996 VA.

8. Calculation 154E (CCN #1, Rev.1)- Dist Panet Londing l

l 1. Dampers 3HVRWOD4531,3HVRWOD45C1, 3HVRWOD4582 and 3HVRWOD45C2 are shown as air operated dampers ("AOD"), not motor operated dampers on Attachment 9 (Pa0es 2 & 10), Attachment 10 (Pages 2 & 12),

and Attachment 19 (Nems 50 and 62). Note that One Line Dia0rnm EE 1CC (Rev. 31) also shows 3HVRWOD4581 and 3HVRWOD45C1 as 'AOD*, but Schematic Diagram ESK-7QZ i

(Rev. 8) shows them as " MOD

• The appropriate documents should be revised to refied the correct identification.

2. Calculations 200E (Rev. O, CCN 2),210E (Rev. O, CCN 1),

and 212E (Rev. O, CCN 2) use load currents or panel loads which are less than those shown in Calculation 154E for the transformers or penois shown below;

a. Calculations 210E (Page 68) and 209E (Page 43) use a loed of 12 KVA for Transformer 3SCV'XD10 but the transformer load

' is 12.983 KVA in Calcula'Jon 154E (Calculations 209E and 210E need to use this for the primary current only).

b. Calculations 200E (Page 8) and 212E (Page 8) use a load of 12 KVA for Transformer 3SCV'XD1P but the transformer load is 12.906 KVA in Calculation 154E (Calculatkms 209E and 212E need to use this fnr the primary current oft /).

r= thth 9165: Ipann 7A and 7AA) nam a land nr 19 MVA Printed 1/7/ss 10:53.17 AM Page 1 or 6 i

, e , -, --- , - -

Northeast Utii8tes ICAVP DR No. DRWW89 thaistone unit 3 Discrepancy Repost for Panel 30CVPNL25P but the panel load is 2.848 KVA in Calculation 154E.

d, Calc 91stion 210E (Pa0es 45 and 45A) uses a load of 4.9 KVA - .

for Panel 38CVPNL90 but the panel load is 5.383 KVA in Calculation 154E. ,

e. Calculation 212E (Pa0e 39) uses a load of 5 KVA for Panel 38CV"PNL9P but the panel load is 8.221 KVA in Calculation 154E.

f. Calculation 210E (Papes 83 and 83'A) uses a load of 12.9 KVA for Panel 38CV"PNLH28 but the panel load it 13.341 KVA in CaWxdation 154E.

g. Caku.ations 200E,210E, and 212E should be revised to use the above va'ues from Calculation 154E. This will reduce the volta 0e at the panels (a non-conserbJtive effect).

The imped of the above discrepancies need to be assessed.

C. Celculation 182E (Rev.1, CCN 1)- Panel Volta 0e Profile

1. In Attachment 1 Pages 55 and 57, the load outront at 240 voies is shown as 29.2 amps for 38CVPNLR10. Calculation 154E (Rev.1, CCN 1) bhows that the load is 7,342 VA which equals 30.8 amps at 240 volts.' Since N value in Calculation 182E is nonconceivative, Calculation 182E should be revised to reflect the actual load from Calculation 154E.

2. In Attachment 1, Pages 59 and 80, the load cuiTent at 240 volts is shown as 29.2 r.mps for 38CVPNLR1P. Calculation 154E shows that the load is 7,225 VA which equais 30.1 amps at

, 240 volts. Sir.co the vs.lue in Calculation 182E is nonconeeNauve, Calculation 182E shouid be revised to reflect the actual load from Calculation 154E.

3. Attachment 1 Column 8 is titled "V M8N/ KV", however, half of the sheets compute the minimum panel vowa0e and half of the shoots compute the maximum panel volta 0s. To avoid confusion and possible misinterpretaHon of data, Attachment 1 should be roidentified so that the sheets which compute maximum panel voltage are labelled as such. An altomotive would be to add a clarifyin0 statement 13 the bogy of thts calculation.

4. Several computed values in Attachment 1 have been inoonectly entered into Tables 2,7 ard Sm. In Table 2, the I- minimum voltage for 38CVPNLH2A should be 192.5 volts and not 194 (see Att.1, Pa0e 56), and the mielmum volta 0e for

' 38CV"PNLH28 should be 192 volts and not 193 (see Att 1. Pa08 50 which computes the volta 0e as 192.5 which should be rounded down for the " minimum volta 0e' entry). In Tabie 7, the minimum volta 0e for SVBA*PNL-VB3 should be 101 volts and not 118 (see Att.1. Pane 55). In Table 8a. the minimum voltaae_

. Pnnled im 010:53.20 AM Pess 2 or 6

Northeast uunne. ICAVP _ DR No DR&34789 misestone unit 3 Discrepancy Report ,

for SVBA-PNL48 should be 190 volts and not 200 (see Att.1,

' Page 51 which compules the volta 0e as 190.5 which should be rounded down for the _* minimum volta 0e* entry) and the >

maximum vota0e should be 201 volts and not 200 (see Att 1,  ;

Paes 52).

t

5. In Table 7, the minimum vonage for 38CA-PNL9N abound be 214 volts and not 215 as Attachment 1 computes the volta 0e for this panel as 214.5, and it should be rounded down for the

" minimum volta 0s entry.

6. Tables 7 and 8 are misleading in

• hat for some panois, the -

" minimum" panel volta 0s is greater than the " maximum" panel volta 0e (this is due to the fed that the panel current is sometimes lar0er for the " minimum" volta 0e run then for the

" maximum

• volta 0e run see 3VBA*PNL-VB1 for example). The numbers in these tables are not really the minimum and 4 maximum panel volta 0es but rather the panel vo# ages when NL-038 is run at the minimum and maximum runs (611 and 603, respedively).

7. In Attachment 11 Pa0e 30, Transformer SSCV*XD24P is shown as a 480120/208 transformer, but One Line Diagram EE-1 AE shows this as a 480-240/120 voit transformer. This node sketch should be conected and, if the program is based on the Pa0e 30 confl0uration, then the pro 0 ram needs to be corrected '

as well.

8. In Attachment il Pa0e 33 Transformer 3VBA XRC 6 is shown

. as a 60 KVA transformer, but One Line Diagram EE 1BA shows this as a 75 KVA transformer. This node sketch should be i conected and, if the data in the OPAL program is based on the Page 33 sketch, then the prognsm needs to be correctA' as well.

9. This calculation uses the resuas of Calculation NL-038, but Calculation NL-042 !s now the calculation of record for minimum -

i bus volta 0s and should be used for minimum bus volta 0es (NL-038 should still be used for maximum bus volta 00s).'

I 10. Aneumption 86 provides the demand factors assi0ned to the panels in this naamdaslag but does not psovide the basis for these demand factors. A reference to a calculation such as Calculation NL-025 should be made to identify the basis for the demand factors used in Calculation 182E.

D.' Calculation 211E (CCN #3, Rev. 0) VBA Panel Volta 08 l

1. This calculation states that it is for reference only ("not a livin0 document"). It does not state what calculation (s) cordrol and evaluate the effects of future additions, deletions, or Man 0es, only that PDCRs which implemerd changes will address the volta 0e drop of the changed circud.

2. In CCN F3. the inrush current is considered for the J10 relavs Prtreed imes 10:53.21 AM , page 3 or e i

, , ,- .,w-.. ,, . - . , , - - - , , - - . . ,< g

DR hie. DR MPW69

. m unuses ICAVP mone use s Discrepancy Report in Circuit att of Panel 3VBAPNL-VB1 and Ciroud 820 of Penel SVBAPNL VB2. There is no doournentation to indiosto that inrush cunent has been considered in other circuits, even thou0h other circuits have rolsys with inrush ounents (e.g., Panel SYBA*PNL VB1 Circuit #10, Panel 3VBAPNL VB2 Circuits #10 and $30. and Bus 1 A Circuit #6 also have J10 relays). - The t

offect of intush cunent needs to be addfessed for those circuits which have devloes with inrush cunents

3. The loading in Calculation 211E does not agree with Calculation 151E (Rev.1, CCN #1). The latest loads are:

- SVBAPNL VB1: 11,664 VA ( 97.45 amps @ 120 volts)

SVBAPNL VB2: 12,210 VA (101.75 amps @ 120 volts)

SVBAPNL VB3: 6.001 VA (50.01 amps @ 120 volts)

- 3VBAPNL VB4: 2,006 VA (17.48 amps @ 120 volts)

4. These loads will doorosse the panel volta 0e for Panels 3VBAPNL VS1 and 3VBAPNL VB2 as follows (using the L

inverter tolerance of 2.4 volts and the impedance of 0.083 W /

1000 feet for a #4/0 AWG cable):

SVBAPNL VB1: 117.6 - 1.6 = 116.0 V L 3VBAPNL VB2: 117.6 - 1.2 = 116.4 V The effect that these lower volta 0es have on the panel loads needs to be assessed.

5. Calculation 211E computes the panel cunent using the nominal 120 voit o,dput ratin0 of the inverter (e.g., see top of Page 19) as opposed to using a reduced volta 0s of 117.6 volts when incorporating the inverter's tetorance. Calculation 211E considers a reduced Inverter output volta 0e elsewhere in the cahW (e.g., see bottom of Page 19), therefore, the reduced l volta 0s should be used when computing ounent (both overall panel cunent as well as that of individual load devices), unless it can be documented that the loads fed from the panels are constant-current devices (i.e., cupent is not affected by volta 0e l

variations). l

6. Using the latest load data fmm Calculation 151E and the 2.4 voit inverter tolerance, the volta 0s at 3HVRYS278 is 104.7 volts and at 3HVRYS528/988 is 104.96 vohs (CCN 82 Paes 6) which are less that the volta 0e of 105 required on Pape 15 of ,

i CCN 82. Note that these occur during a traneeent condition.

l 1

6. On CCN 82 Paes 12, the cables used to determine the  ;

voltage drop from 3HVRPNL48 to 3EH8*MCC381 and fmm  ;

SEH8*MCC381 to 3J8*1314 are size #12 AWG cables, however l-CCN 82 Paes 11 shows that the omble imm 3EHS*MCC381 to -

3JB*1314 is a #14 AWG cable (this was confirmed by review of cable database MSC8LRWf) Using the appropriate cable impedance, plus the latest load data from Calculation 151E and the 2.4 voit inverter tolerance, the volta 0e at 3HVRYS52A/96A l is 104.06 volts (CCN 82 Paos 12) which is less that the voksne Pnreed 1mes 1o53:22 AM Pese 4 or 6

1 ICAVP DR No. DN84789 Nethead umieles wastaw unit 3 Discrepancy Report of 105 tequired on Pa0s 15 of CCN #2. Note that this occurs  !

during a transient condition.

7 - The cable length used on Pa0s 13 for Cable 3RPSAOC505 is shown as 321 feet, however ostne database M3CBLRWY shows >

this cable length as 267 feet Calculation 151E phows the load l for this circut as 112 VA, not te VA. These two discrepancies have no impact on the roeults of this calculation,

8. On Pape 16, the cable number for Circut #19 is . .

3VBA10C810 (verified by MSCBLRWY and One i ine Diagram EE 11 A, Rev.13).

9. The cable descrisdion is missing for Cable SVBANOK510 (Pape 18, Circuit 21), it is 2/C, #12 AWG,1000V, CU.

10. Circum #2 on Panel 3VBA'PNL-VB2 is shown as ' SPARE' but is shown in Calculation 151*! as a 360 VA circuit (3RP8HAKSET6). Thorofore, the volta 0e at the load for this circuit is indeterminste because it has not been evalueled.

1 11, On Pape 25, the cable sizes for Cables 3RPS2WK800, 3RPS2WK801,3RPS2WK802, and 3RPS2WK803 are shown as 86 AWG, but a review of M3CBLRWY shows that these cables

are #12 AWG. This reduces the load volta 0e to 116.8 VoNs

. (circuit #7) and 112.8 volts (circuit #6) which are still above the minimum required volta 0s, i 12. On Pape 26, the load for Circuit #10 is shown as 89 VA, but l l Calculation 151E shows this load as 112 VA. This discrepancy  !

has no impact on tP suits of this calculation.

13. On Pa0es 36 and 31, the Cable Mark Number is shown as NHP-98, but a review of M3CBLRWY shows that the Cable Mark Number is NHP 97. This discrepancy has no impact on the results of this rmaridating, noview Vaske invand No ded osse initisur: Mandse,D.J. O 12/isse7 VT Lmed: Nort, Ardhony A Q Q 12/1sS7 VT Mgr: Sohopfer, Den K Q Q 12/2&o7 I

IRC Chmn: singh. Anand K .O 5'5*s Date:

INWALD:

DeM:

nesoLurioN.

Pnndously keenallied by Nu? U Yes (@ No NonDhserspeedCondnion?O Yes (@ No noemeenrenenstO v. @* n =sawa= unr=

• edt O v a @ No as*.

P Not Aseeptakte Needed Date m%

VT Leed: Nerl, Ardheny A

~ - "- - n_ ,, O O Pitnted im9s 105124 AM Pese 5 or 6 l

c ICAVP DR No. DR44PW89 Northeast utsties m et e une s Discrepancy Report c.

-)

RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K O O O 1 O .O O l Detr.

St.Cepenents:

l Printed 1/1/9610:5326 AM Page 6 of 6

~ . - - - -. _- - - - - _ _ . - - - -- - -.- .

Northeast Utimie. ICAVP m No. m.ases4m umetorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report moview areup: system On VAuD noview seament: welem Design Dessipene: m Dnion O v.

Dieseepency type: convenerd Date g, syenewPreesse: oss W Signiteense twel: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Deen pubsehed: 1/1096

. -ii Messing vendor drawing for valve 3QSS*V032 D*: The plant computer data base, GRITS, iderdifos the drawing for valve SQSSM)32 as drawing number 25212-29153-00022. The computer data base cross references this drawing number to vendor drawin0 number B-51319 Neither of these drawings are found in the drawing system, moview Vand Invesd Needed Done initiator: Feingold, D. J. - g D 12/1247 VT Leed: Neri, Anthony A g g 12/1647 VT Mer: Sehepfer, Den K g 12/2397 sec chmn: singh, Anand K O O 12/3157 Date:

DNAUD:

Date:

nesotum,  !

w.e. ., .= u v- e a. #en oise,e,ar.c n.thentu v- e u. l i

n bmennenero70 v. @ us munradad70 va @ u. i nwow Wh Not Acceptaine Needed Date mg VT Leed: Neri, Anthony A VT begr: Schopfer, Den K inC Clenn: Singh, Anand K O ba O  :

Date:

SL Commente:

l l

1 j

Printed 1/74810:53.50 AM PeGe 1 of i

_ ,,m_. ,. ,_

- -_______a. -*__.-_a _ - _ _ _ . ,,. ._

_w.mw-y n _ , , , . ,

m m uundes ICAVP= M No. M M S M l Minetone unit 3 Discrepancy Report natow eeoup: syneem DRvAuD metow simame: system Design ,,,,,,,  %

Dessipibie: Electrieel Desi'"

O va Discrepeney Type: Caindellen gg Systemeroeses: N/A NRC Signilleenee level: 3 Does faxed to Nu:

Does Pubituhed.1/10s8 Dieerepency: Cable lengths used assume ene way voltage drop (Calcu!stion 122E).

Descrapson: This calculation sizes the PT leads between the switchgear lineups and the main control board.

The analytical model used to determine voltagJ drop lists the distances to th6 Main Control Board (MCB) from the 6.g,4.16 and .480 Volt switchgear lineups without stating whether the distance is a cable length or a circuit length ( they appear to be cable lengths). The calculation should use the circuit length in calculating the total voltage drop. Also, no reference . : provided as to the basis for the cable lengths. A single distance is provided for the cable length from each of the switchgear lineups to the MCB without any justification that the length listed is the longest.

No reference is provided thet states why a 2 voit drop is acceptable.

Calculation 122E supersedes Calculation 44E. However, under

• Objective

• It states " to check Calculation No. 44E " and under "

Assumptions" It states " See Calc. No. 44E." If Calculation 122E doos supersede Calculation 44E lt should be stated within the objedive and the assumptions should be repeated in Calculation 1226.

Review veild invalid Needed Date inleister: Cruolust, Ed. G O O 12ii2s7 VT Lead: Nort. Archeny A Q Q Q 12/16s7 VT Mgr; sehopfer, Den K G O 12/23s7 WIC Ceann: singh, Anand K m O 12/3147 Date:

INVALID:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

...  ?, Idenelsed by Nu? O vos (eD No NonDioerepentCondaien?Q ves (S) No~

neemmene amnerO vos @ No - unroemedt O vos @ No .

nwoow mg @ Not W ^ Needed Date VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O VT neer: schepser. Don x C D G inC cason: sinen. Anand x

@ G Date:

PtWted 1/7/9e 1054.24 AM Page 1 or 2

o ,

,s- -

l L ,

Nw# mad m K:AVP DR No. DROM7st f -

h M3 Discrepancy Report St.Commones:

4

$O51WMA N Page 2 of 2

Nwtheast UWWo. K:AVP M No. MWW68 MWetaw unit 3 Discrepancy Report newesw emup: synom OnyAuD nwiew eNmmt: symem temic ,,,,, ,,, ,,,, m Dissipane: Em 0"*"

O Ya Diserepenry Type: %W g SL'- . 7 DWA NRC tegmaeanse level: 3 Date FAKad to NU:

Date Puhelehed.1/1090

. + Incorrect values used for motor full load currord (Calculat6on -

129E).

Daaripeten! This calculation determines the maximum motor control center toedir4 based on feeder voNa0e drop.

The calculation uses motor full load current from the NEC which is based on 460V but the MCC loadin0 is based upon a MCC voNage of 422 VoNs.

Page i af the calculat6on references Calculation 119E for empeoNy values. This calculation is superseded by Calculation 193E which is not available for review, n atow Veed tweled Needed Date Inilleter; Crockett.Ed. O O O 12/1257 Q 12/1697 VV Lead: Nerl, Anthony A Q YT Mgr: schepeer, Den K O O O $2t2ser IRC Chmn s6ngh.AnandK Q 12/31/97 Dele:

IDNAUD:

Date:

netoLUTION.

~

7..."-";idoneland by nut O Yes @ No Non DeserepmW Canellen?Q Yes @ No nosetumenponenetO va @ No - u e c O va @ we nwiew Asseptetw 16st?; . Needed Date VT Land: Neri, Anthony A b I '

VT Mer: schepier, Den K iaC cienn: sinsh. Anand K O u O Date:

SL Commesde:

4 h

Peted im9s 1096 As And Pe p 1 of 1 r

~ - - . - . - - - , , . . . , - , , . . _ - , , , . . . , . . - - . , , - , - , , , - ,. -.-, . - . . , . - - , , _ ,, -

K:AVP DR No. DRW34W l tomtheast umme.

Mmetaw unit 3 Discrepancy Report newtow aroup: Slanem OnVAuD newtow teament: System Dee  ;

D6amir m as: Mahonimi De*

O vee E - i Type

• Companord Does (g i 8,2_ A ' Ras Nnc W M 3 Dee faxed to NU:

Date Pubilehed: 1/109s E  ; ii inconsistency betwn spec 2362.200164 & celo US(B) 322 w/

resped to SetSS*MOV20A,B,C,0 desi0n temp Desertpalen: Desl9n specmcation 2362.200164 Revision 1 identifies the design temperature for valves 3RS8*MOV20A.8,C,0 as 150  !

degrees Fahrenheit. Calculations US(B) 322 Revision 2 (CCN 1) and P(R) 1186 Revision 1 (CCN 2) show that the maximum possible temperature of the containment roolrCulation fluid is 260 d*0rees Fahrenholt. This maximum temperstwo is based on a postulated loss of one train of service water to the containment recirculation coolers.

The design temperature in the specification is not conservative compared to the temperature determined in the Calculation.

neview VeM InveN Needed Date inleister: Feingold, D. J. Q Q Q 12/1247 VT W Neri, Anthony A Q Q Q 12/1697 VT Mori schopfer, Den K O O O ' 2'27 ptC Chmn: sirgh, Anand K Q Q Q 12/31/97 Date:

WWAUD:

Date:

nE80LUTION:

7,.." r"; Mentleed by NUF Q Yes (@ No NM D6ectopent Condellen?Q Yes (e) No

"" Pundingf 0 vos @ Ne = " - unreseevedt O vos @ No n.wiew Inlete'ert (none)

VT Lead: Nort, Armany A , O O O VT Mgri schopfer, Don K O O i

stC Chan: sirgh, Anand K Date:

sL Commente:

PrHed 1/r/9610 8613 AM page 1 of 1

m et m K:AVP DR % DR*84N i m otorm ur* 3 Discrepancy Report R-ion e,e,: s, e,n DavAun W luoment: spelem Demir ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,g,,,,

Diestpens: Elastrical Demir O v.

F , .-, Type: NW gg 6,^--,-- m N/A W tegniesencilwel* 3 Date faxed le NW.

DatePuhitehed: 1/1096 DeserePancy: Cable lengths used do not agree with NUSCO Cable and Racewey (Calculation 228E).

peseetythm: This calculation verifles the short circuit withstand ratings for ,

Cat. I 1000 V Short length power cables. ,

The cated lengths used in Attachment til of the calculation do not agree with the cable lengths listeJ in the NUSCO Cable and Racewey System. The source of the lengths used in the calculation are from an interoffloe correspondence included as Attachmerd lit of the calculation. An explanmlon of the basis for '

these lengths should be included in the calculation.

This calculation refers to Calculation 141E. Calculation 141E has been superseded by Calculation NL-051 and the informstlon from Calculation NL 051 should be used in this calculation.

Rev6ew Vand imead Needed Date inalater: Crocholt Ed. O O O $ 2 **7 12/1&97 VT Land: Nort, Anthony A Q Q Q Q 12/2397 Q

VT hegri Sehepfer, Den K Q Q 12/3147 ptC Clenn: airgh. Anand K Q Q Date:

IIWALID:

Date:

ResoLUTIoti:

7../ ~ ^^;leonIIAnd by Nur (,,) vos @ No NonDieneepentCandlI6en?() vos @ No ReeeeutlenPendinetO vos @ No --unreseevedtO vos @ No Review A. Not Acceptable Needed Date VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O O O VT tigr: schapser, Dcn K O O IRC cienn: Sergh, Anand K Date:

sL Cenerade:

Prtreed 1/TSB 10 Nt 23 Ahl Pope 1 of 1 g , e- ,- - - - - - ----,,,wm .,p. ,aw.-e,w, ---

Nwtheast ummes K:AVP m us.OR w s4 m l useinemm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report i noveaw aroup: a vstem onVaun newesw seemen: system Destyi l

. _, Type: Campened Dato O vos i cg g i 0, f- _ - ': HVX W tegnateense twel: 4 Date faxed to NO:

Date Puhdished: 1/1096 ,

Dies'apaner: Environmental Parameters Disoropsncy in Specif6 cation 2170.430 140  :

Desertpleen: The procurement spooification No. 2170.430140 for the Axlal  ;

Flow Fans of Buffalo Forge Co. does not list the expooted environmental paremotors for the environmental equipment l qualification (EQ) Zones amWed with the following safety.

reisted Claes 1E Westinghouse fan motors :

3HVRTN13A,8 ; 3HVRYN10A,B ; SHVRTN6A,5 ;

SHVRYN14A,8 Milletone Unit 3 FSAR Sootion 3.115.2.2 requires that all Class 1E equipment specifications define at least the worst case envelope servios conditions antionpoled for Class 1E electrical equipment.

The rev6ew of the EQ Test Report No. DO-146F (Reference No. ,

e HVX A.2 0011) confirms that the above mentioned fan motors are environmentally qualified to the bounding environmental  !

parameters at the existing motor locations in the auxiliary building of the plant in Zone AS 04.

nwiew WatW tweed Needed Date initiater: Yeme% 3. O O O '2/1a7 .

VT Leed: Nest, Anthony A O O g 12/1647 ,

VT Mgr: Sehepfer, Den K "

O O '2/23 7 Inc Chmn: sm Anand K Q g 12/3147 Date:

DfVALW:

Date:

ftEcoLUTtoN:

M/ _ _^, IdenteAnd by Nuf V Yes @ No NonSteerepentCeamsten?O Yes @ No neeshmenpeamaetO Y= @ No neeshmenu-se*edrO vos @ No now.

Aeospeekte Not Acceptekee Needed Date g,ggg,,, g VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O i VT Mgr: tahap per, Den K sic chen: sm Answ K O

O O Date:

at Commente:

Prmted 1/7/9810.98 S3 AM Page 1 or 1 i

e .- .m.~ . . , , . _ . .-__,,_..-.-.,..-__.__y. . . , _ . _ . , , , , . , . , _ , _ _ , . , . _ _ , , , , . , ,

I K:AVP DR 96e. DR 4W'84406 Nwtheast Ummu museww unit 3 Diuropancy Report antow assie: sponom omvAus

• " " " ' " "

• Potenew opwehneyleeue onestynne: Enieen ww mi" Desempeney Type: Congsterd Date O v.  !

@ No  !

Systene84eeees: HVX NRc Dipifteense twel: 4 Does faxed to NO:

Does Published: 1/1M8 piewe,aney: Equipment Location D6eoropenoy in Spoo6 float 6on 2176.430446  :

Duwepeten: In the Procurement Spec 6f6 cation No. 2176.430448 the Data Shoot of the Westinghouse Claes 1E motors of the Air Handlerg Units 3HVR*ACU1 A,5 spoolfles the location of the motors as the Control BuildinD + Control Room.

However, according to the Millstone Ec.uipment Qualification i Master List (EQML) the location of the same motors is listed as the Auxii6ery Building in EQ Zone AB 21 at Elevation 66ft46n in the MCC A/C Room.

Also, the review of the FSAR Pape No. 38127 confirms that the ex!stin0 location of the motors is Zone AB-21 in the Auxiliary Building nev6.w Vand inveN Needed Oste inte6 sten veemin,s. Q Q Q 12/1W7 12/1a7 n teed: Nui, Anwy A O O O n men sons,w,oen x 0 0 O 22/2m .

me ciein: sw. An as x a e D 12/stier Date:

sWALD:

Date:

REtoLUTioN:

Mr ";leoneined by Nut Q vos (@ No NoneteereposeCondaten?Q vos (ST No mes*sion ponanetO va @ No nosehmenu.eeemedrO vos @ No ne*w AssepteWe Net W e Needed Does

% (none)

VT Lead: Nut, ArWieny A O O "

vT men sen.,w, oen x 0 O O m e cie in: av. Anana x Dese:

SL Cenemente:

Pnneed1/7/98108021 AM page 1 or j y- -m -w w-i -~ee ?-= - y --

Nodhood iutma- K:AVP DR No. DRW861 l Maidene unit 3 Discrepancy Report moview aroup: system Dnvaue Revtow munent: system Demir ,,,,,,,,g,,,,,,,,,,,,

08"8""'P " ""** O vm Demerspency Type: NW g g, s_--

, a Hvx NRC siputteense level: 4 Date faxed to 18):  !

Date Pidshehed: t/lM6

. -i. Supply and Retum Air Register Prosauro Drop Data L Desertpmen: During review of the duct preneure drop calculations a d6eoropency regarding the pressure drop values used for the supply and retum air registers was Idertified.

The following calculations do not provide a reference or source for the supply and retum air register pressure drops used in the calculation:

PBV-45AA 1 Extemal Total Pressure Loss for SHVR'ACU1 A &

18 PSV-45AF 1 Extemal Pressure Loss for System 3HVRTN 12A

& 125 P8V-45AG 1 Total Pressure Loss for Fan 3HVRYN13A & B P8V-45AH 1 Total Pressure Loss for Fan 3HVRYN14A & 14B Rev6.w Vand invelld Needed Oste hillistort tied.M D. O O 12/1H7 VYLeed: Neri, Anthony A O O O ' 2/'"7 VT Ingr: schgder, Den K O O 52/2w7 MC Chmn: s% Anand K -

O $ 2/87 Date:

WWAUD:

Date:

FIEGOLUTIoN:

mc'-- *, identiend by Nut U Yee I91 No Non Diessepent Cenesion?U Yes (9) No m%tO Ya @ me neemmeaunt w edrO va @ we Rev6.w Ameeptable Not * - - , " " Needed Date ,

VT Lead: Nort, Angreny A O O O '

VTIngr Schopfer. Den K IRC C4unn: shgh, tviend K ,

Date:

sL Cenenente:

f Prtreed 1/7/9610.99 de AM Page 1 of 1

Netheast Uumlee ICAVP M*M#P888 M**emw unit Discrepancy Report -

swsw areup: syenen onvAus l t

Inwesw shment: syenun ossion ,,,,,,,,,

enesipene: t w os*'"

O vw 6-paswepeney Type: casewheen gg

~

6,-  ! 14/A Nmc signeseenseIwed: 3 Does FANed to NW:

Date Puhelshed: 1/1oes

-- . -,. Referenood loading cont

• tion sheets are not included with the calculation (Calculation 139E).

Dewription: This coloulation determines the running load condMions of large equipment under var 6ous plant operating modes.

To propero Table 1 of the calculation, the properor of the calculation completed sheets which idemif6ed the loadin0 condnions for the verlous liems of equipment and issued these sheets vie Interoffloe correspondence to several NUSCO personne: for confirmation or commerds. This interoffloe correspondence is included in the calculat60n as Attachmerit 1.

However, several of the memos state that "the attached sheets i are correct' but do not include the attached sheets so that n comparison can be made to Table 1. The shoots that were sent for review and/or confirmation with the interoffice correspondence should be included with the calculation.

nwiew vand twend Needed osee inelater: Croclutt. Ed. O O O 13t1557 vitmd: Nwt. AnIhwy A O O O 18'1557 vibegr schspier, Den K O O O isr2ser sic cienn: sm. Anans x .

O O 12'8i/'7 asse:

sNALID:

Oste:

REeOLUTIoN:

r. / - , lesnamed by Nut Q Vm W No Non Olewapent Condelen?Q VM Y No nosoluelenPenenetO vos @ No nessiunisa unteneevedt O v a @ No n w6ew mg P Not ? - , Needed Dues viLand: Nort. Anthony A O O O vien er: schepier, oen x 0 0 0 meciew s m.Anansx Date:

sL comunante:

Prtreed 1/rst 1120.17 AM Pass 1 of 1

t Northoset Duitties 6CAVP M

• M*84884 l umetaw unit 3 Discrepancy Report  :

nwtow emup: systwn est VauD  !

" " "'"""

• pesenmar operehanyleen Damalpene: tiestasef Des **

O v.

Otsempeney Type: Instensson me,*wnwes ,,

ayonenweresses: rnx islc elentseense twas:3 Des faxed to W:

Does pubmehed. trioes d . -ii Means for moeung commitment not 6denufied Deserveen: In FSAR Table 1.61, R. G.1,76 Comp 66anoe, it is stated that,  ;

' Cable that is not flame retarderd is onceoted in a ded6cated recewey for the enure length of the run.*

Spec E 360 states that *All cubie suns, except some of those for '

lighting, security, heat trocings, oathodic protection, communlootion, and grounding 8Yst*ms are covered by cable schedules.* However, a review of eve 46eblo documordation, includ;ng SPEC E 360 *Electr6 cal Installation Specifications

• and

" Cable Information System,* did not disc 60ee a means for iderdifying or controlling cable that is not flame retardant. There appears to be no provision for identNying such cable in the cable informanon system, nwtow Velhi Involld leseded Date innlater: Rish, J. M. .

O O i2/1697 t2/1797 YT t.aed: Norf, Anthony A Q Q vr Men new , Den K O O O $2/2 m etc Ctenn: Singh, Anand K Q Q Q t2/31/97 Date:

WWauD:

Dates metOLUTION' T. /--- ';identesed by Nur U vos (DEN. Non Olsempent Condalen?O vos ($) No neemmenpeamaerO va @ me n=ehmenurseewadrO va @ No nwiew haaaran Not Acceptable Needed Date mg i VT Lessi: Nort, Anthony A O O O l VT Mgri Schapter Den K I b i lite otsun: Sergh AnandK Dets:

O b '

l SL Cenenente:

i l

Prmled 1/7/9s 1it00 47 AM Page1 er 1 m . _ . __ __ _ __

i, Netheast Umw K:AVP M No. DR MP3406 l utsistan unit 3 Discrepancy Report ammm m - .

newtow emip: system envAuo  !

Potential operahmey lease Olseiptow: Meehweoal oseion g y,, ,

(

Olaerepeney Type: rair%

tretenWPresses: sWP 1810 siyilheense level: 3 Date faxed to 18):  !

Date Puhalshed.1/1098 F . :r. Reduction in Mater 6al Strength of impelier for SSWPP3A/B Deserireten: PDCR No. MP3-91068 changes the mater 6al of the impeller for [

the Control Building A/C Booster Pumps 38WPP3A and B from ASTM B144 968 aluminum tronze to ASTM A744 Grade M 35 Monel. The strength of the replacemort materialis less than that of the original. The tensile strength of ASTM B148 958 aluminum bronze is 65 kal and the tensile strength of ASTM A744 Grade M 35 Monelis 60 kal. Yield strength le also reduced. No justification for the reduction in strength has been provkled in the modification package, noview ,

Vedid invalid Needed Date inittster: Johnson, Joy 0 0 O '2/16'7 v7 Lead: Nwl, Areieny A O O O ' 2" Vf Men schopfer,DenK O O O 52'2*'7 m e chnia: sigh, Anand x 0 0 O inesis7 Date:

IINALS:

Date:

mE40LUTION:

Provisuely identined by Nut Q Yee @ No Non Oteerepent condalenfQ Yes @ No

""Pendtne?O vee @ No Rosetullen unreestved?O vos @ No moview Aseeptable Not W e Needed Dale mg VT Leed: Nort, Areieny A O O O vi Men schelde,oon x 0 0 g mc com=: sy, Anand x Date:

0 0 sL Canonents:

Prtreed 1/r481191:34 AM Pope 1 or 1

l

• wm l CAW DR tie. DR 4AP84806 telnetene Unit 3 Discrepancy Report  ;

I movesemeisp: apassa envaue  ;

E navesew syness oesp ,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,

sessipame: samoisalosse (-)y,, i

""8"'F W C"**'" @ No eysessemesse: m jl aancawassenseloves:3 o,e, pan.g e.uu:

estePuhassed: Moes l

. .. Samory and DC System e dr=mM Discrepanoles )

i emessepsion: A, edaiad% sp.gs.gg411 (Rev,1) t 1

4 1. This *ddM contains tabs which derive data from numerous adrudd%s which have been superseded. t

!' 4 Calculation SP MS-EE411 does not state W the data from these '

superooded sources is still valid, only that SP-MS Ed411 *is to maintain and preserve documentation that serves as references for the DC adruddNe*, including " portions of previous

' calculations". The superseded sources should be evaluated to determine W they are still valid and, W they are, confirm in writin0 as port of Calculation SP MS-EE411, and W they are not, to be i replaced with data from active adruddlanis. For example, Tab '

SS references and includes selected papes from Calculation 188E. Pape 2 of Tab 66 shows the battery profile of Battery #3  ;

and this profile shows a minimum voMage of 108.4 volts at a  ;

constant emp ruta of 143 amps. However, the current bettery .

ama, ddanni used for Millstone Unit 3 is BATF96124EES (Rev. [

j 0), and it shows (on Pages 3 and 5 et Attachment H) that the ,

minimum voltage is 108.06 volts at a varying load of 165.06 to -

177.03 amps.

! A listing of these superseded adrudd%s which are refotonood and include portions of themselves ine druddla't SP-MS-EE 011 ,

ero: ,

Reference to Calc. Which I Tab superseded Calc. Supersedes 4,9,80,70,71,72, 91416000E3 BAT 2 961243E3  ;

100,111,113 i 15.28,29,30,108 214E BAT 1 4 1241E3  ;

17,27 218E BAT 1 4 1241E3 17,26,28,107 218E BAT 190-1241E3 i 17 223E BAT 2-961243E3 ,

17,110 226E BAT 2 4 1243E3 l 17.112 22SE BAT 2-061243E3  ;

31,32 - 213E BAT 1061241ES i' 105,108 91419 007E3 BAT 1 4 1241E3 L

66,67,08,114 180E (see T belov// .;

T = BAT 141241E3, BAT 2 061243E3, BAT 3-961246E3, BAT 4 961244E3, and BAT-8YST 1240E3

2. Installed cable lengths, which are documented as attachments to this adruadN, are ollen substituted for cable ,

lengths listed in NU's cable recewey

.. _._ m m _. _ m _,m___

database "MSC8LRVW"_.__

. _ . % , _ _. m .m

=,

V -----v-g -w ---,iww V v- v vm - " - ' " -r - -'4' " - - - -

{

l

~~, .._ - _ . . ..-__. _..... _.. ..._,.,._,. ... _ .-_.. ..._ ,__..._ _ .._ _ .. ,_ ,,,,_, ._ _,_, _ _ , _ _ ,..,.,,,. _ ., . , _ , , _ , , , ,

l N U MNes ICM DR No. DR4P84406 R4Nistene Unit 3 Discrepancy Report j i instated calde lon0ths, therefore, R is not clear how NU  !

i maintains control to guerentee that the some calde longlh is I used for the same ontde in au calculadons. Examples of the i differences in calde lengths are shown on Tabs 18 throu0h 21 of I 4

the ceiculation. Calculation SP43 EE 311 states on Tab 18 that tripiou cetnes should have their lineer loneth increened ty an  ;

i- modelonel 3% to socount for the twisted conductors. It 16 not  ;

clear if this coloulation or other coloulations which use triplex  ;

caldes for volta 0s drop calculations (e.g.,200E,210E,2'2E, }

etc.) have incrossed the cetdo lengths ty 3%. l 1

5. BAT 141N1E3 (Rev.1) & BAT 2-061243E3 (Rev.1)

1. Calculanon SP4ME411 (Rev.1) Tab 96 states that the '

minimum voltage required for en Hl' A relay is 40% (of 125 volts) for the operste coil and 76% (of 125 volts) for the roset coil, but the Path Volta 0s Drop Summary sheets of Calculations RAT 14  ;

1N1ES and BAT 241243E3 use a minimum voltage of 76 volts (75 volts plus 1 voit for inlemal wiring) for both coils. 3 CalculeWons RAT 141241ES and BAT 241243E3 should be  !

revised to aeree with Calculation SP48 EE411. This disotopency does not have an affect on Calculations BAT 14 1241E3 and BAT 241243E3 because the node voltage is always much gree 6er than the ruling of the HFA roset ooil (94  :

volts).

2. Calculation SP48 EE411 Tab SS states that the wetta0s of  !

an Amorece (A0estat) 7000 sortes coil is 8 watts which equates ,

to SW /12SV = 0.084 emps, r*MN SPMS-EE411 Tab 4 states that the amps of this coilis 0.07 amps or 0.14 amps. The ,

value used in the Load Tabuistion sheets of Calculations BAT 1-981N1ES and BAT 241243E3 is 0.08 amps which is less than Calculanon SPMS EE411 and is therefore not conservauve.  !

Calculations BAT 141N1E3 and BAT 241243E3 should be

, revised to agree with Calculation SPMME411. This dienrepeacy does not have an affect on Phh%s BAT 14 '

1NIES and SAT 2-081NSE3 boosues these devices are not onergized durtne the beWory load pronie.

3. Calc 3enon SPMS EE411 Tab 4 states that the inrush ounent of a Gould J181TE reisy is 100 volt-amperos, but Calculadons BAT 1981241E3 and BAT 241243E3 use a value of 100 amps for inrush in the Load Tabulation sheets.

Calculeuens BAT 141N1E3 and BAT 2-061243E3 should be c revloed to agree with '*h% SP43-EE411. This '

discrepanor does not have en effect on Calculeuens RAT 1 06-1M1ES and RAT 2 061243E3 boosues the inrush cummt is not -

used during the hemoryload proAle.

4. Calculeuens BAT 141241E3 and BAT 241243E3 state, in

the " Summary of Resuhs" ("Devios Volta 0e"), that a volta 0s drop l F ..

analysis is not performet' for all devioss Documentauon could i not be found in this amm% or other coloulations which justify ,

that adequale volte0s will amist at these devices when these devices are reeuired to -ate in any at the soonarios listed in Poemsimes tt:otos AM Pese 2 or 3 I

,m.,-,,o_m_.,,_,.Uc_-.--,-,,--.,..-v.,. _m__m-.m__._-_~

__ ~ _ _ ._ _ , _ _ _ ~ _ . . - -a

' N ath aee u m mes ICAVP DR No. DRW36 Isinsemw unit 3 Discrepancy Report  !

Calculauon BAT SYST 1240E3 (Rev.1).

I

5. Appendix A locludes a one line diagram for the battery, charger, and bettery panels and loads, in Calculation BAT 196  ;

1241E3, Cables 3EGFBPK400,3 ENS 8PK406,3EGESPK600, 3EG88PK600, and 3EG88PK401 have lengths whloh are tw40s as lon0 as shown in NU Cable Database M3CidLRWY, other cables shown in the one line, as well as all cables shown in the one llne of Calculation BAT 2 961243E3, agree with '

MSC8LRWY.

in the one line diagram in Calculation BAT 2 961243E3, Cable SENSAOK606 is 4xmn as a #12 AWG cable, but M3CBLRWY ahows this cable with a Mark Number NHT 93 which is a 86 AWG cable, in the one line diagram in Calculation BAT 2 961243E3, Cable SCE860C110 is shown as a #14 AWG cable, but M3CSLRWY shows this cable with a Mark Number NHQ 47 whloh is a 24/C

1. 16 AWG cable.

nwte.

Vand twebd Needed Date insistor Mendel, D. J. O O u 12/'"7 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O O O 52/5 " 7 l

VT Mgr: Dohepeer DenK Q =

D 12/2347 ,

500 Chan: SW, Anand K Q m = 12/3147 Does:

WWAUD:

Date:

REtoLUTeoN:

NTz ';ldenuned by NU7 U Yes @ No Non 06eerepent Condalen?Q vos @ No no.eimienp nenerO va @m - um.e*.drO va @m as*.

Aseeptable Not Aeoeptehle Needed Oste

%g VT Leed: Nort. Anthony A O O O vi Men sonspe.. oen x 0 0 0

~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ? B B Date:

SL Comments' l

Prmled 1/74811:o2.0s AM Pepe 3 or 3 l

_ . . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ - . _ _ . . _ - _ _ ._ _ _ _-_ _ ..~.-_. _ . _ . - _ _ . - . . . _ . . _ _ _ . . _ ._ .

(

i Nonhoast Utmuse ICAVP DR h. DRMSMT l Missate'w Ur* 3 Discrepancy Report .

nev6ew aroup: ayalam OnvAun m w syewn DmWn ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,3,,,, l

"'"**"* * ' O v.

Dimeopeney Type: carreenwd Des s,1 : . - - - - - Dax Om NR3 tientenance levet: 3 Date faxed to NU:

Date Puhmehed: 1/ toes F . i; Means for meetin0 commitment not identified De*wip*6en: Section 8.3 of the FSAR contains the followin0 statement. Safety.

related equipment in all plant areas is alther protected from automatic fire protection effluents or, on the basis of test data, have demonstrated their operabiitty in the environment that may be caused by the fire protection effluents.

Per hem 453 in the annotaded SAR this is an open item; "Yet to review specifications for cable, equipment, etc., in CO2 areas . ,

TBD." This note indicates that CO2 effects will be evaluated.

However information could not be located which indicated that Halon effluent effects have been evaluated for those areas where Halon systems are installed, newtow Valid Invelld Needed Date 12/16,7

- Inadster: Rich, J. M. - g Q

VTLand: Nerl, Anthear A O O O 12/57/'7 VT Mgr Schapter Den K O O O '2/23,7 IRC CAnn: Singh, Anend K Q g Q 1.*G'.197 Date:

INVAUD:

Dele:

nE80LUTIoN:

.~.;f r",-leentlhed by NU? Q Yes @ No NonOleerspentCondelen?O Yes (el No meseiumenPenenetO va @ No nosetunian uareesivest O v a @ Ne nev6.w We Not Aseeptable Needed Date mg VT taes: Nerl, Ant any A O O O VT Mgr: schopfer DenK O O -

sic cm sm Anand K O O m Date:

SL Commente:

l Pitnted 1/7/9s it se St AM Page 1 of 1

- . . . . .. _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ A

3 Nodheast Umuse K:AVP " "' D" "  :

use6mm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report  ;

e,*w a%: e,sion DRvaun Ro*w" transa Desden Demolpeme: Einst*=i Deep -

mww g y ,,

l DesempJoy Type: Usensirg Deewnwd g) g,

• 0,___  : -- DQX ,

latC algelamense level:' Date FAEed to NU: l DeQs pubilshed: 1/10es r- . -, Frequency and Voltage Values in DBSD do not appear to match i

• Spec Values  ;

one = w ien: S w . ,

Emergency Diesel Generator A Operability Test, OPS Form 3546A.1 1, Pa0e 2 of 3, dated 54/97 lists a number of Generator Operability Tests and Tech Spec Acooptance Criteria.

Stop Parameter / Condition T/s Aooeptance Criteria 4.2.7 EDG A Voltage 3740 4580V 4.3.8 EDG A Frequency 59.2 60.8 Hz Doolon Basis Summary Document 3DBS-EDG-002, paragraph

8.1 states

Generator Terminal Volta 0e . 5.eady State: 4160 Volts nominal steady state (4847 volts maximum, 3973 volts minimum) within

+/ 21 volts l

l Dee40n Baals Summary Documert 3DBS-EDG-002, paragraph l 8.2 states:

Generator Frequency . Steady 8 tate: 60 Hz Nominal steady stah (60.5 Hz maximum in the no load, droop mode, 59.85 Hz minimum)

Conclusion:

l The nominal values stated in the Design Basis $wmary Documort do not appear to match the limit on 'adw#' values in the Tech Spec Operstdlity tests.

Rom.

Welld levelld Needed Done Inteleter: Womer,1. O O O tattse7 VT Leed: Nerl, Anthony A O O O 12tirs7 VT legr Schapser, Den K O O O $2/2s,7 IRC Cteun: Shgh, Amend K -

D D tarsis7 Date: ,

DNALB:

m:

RBeOLLmoN:

.t/~ -?, IdenNeed by Nut U Yes @ No NonDeserepentCanellen?U Yee @ No l

Pnnled II7Als 11:1o.is AM P Os 1 or 2 i

, _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ - . _ . . . , , . . _ , . _ . . _ . - . . . . _ . . , _ , . . ., ___...____..___...___m.._ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 ,

Phtheast utmees K:AVP M No. MW84408 l i

MWa M 3 Discrepancy Report m%eu v. (e> m --ru v <e> N.  :

L N

m p) h E4 W^ Needed Date YT Lead: Hed, Arnhany A O O O i VT Mgr1 Sohapter, Den K O O O M h Singh, Anmd K [

Date:

SL Cesmmente:

I j

Prtnied 1/1,9611:10.21 AM Py 2 W 2

. .- - , . =

4 l

Norm.a.: usw ICAVP ca m. Dws4ste masten. Unit 3 Discrepancy Report nessee, w aime.n On vate i nevher Shonent: W Deden PeteselalOpwebuty leeue theelpene: EiseMrJ Deel'"

'"- , Type: Calcutemen O va i f9) No systenWPresses: Dox ,

W aI MEsene#I B Wei: 3 Date faxed le DAh l Date Pubilshed: 1/1090

. -,. Could not locate coloulat60n which vertfles adequacy of control j circuit voMage at 4kV tweakers  ;

Desertpelen:

Design Basis Summary Document SELE-001, Rev.1, paragraph 12.2.3 states:

The control voMage for the 4100 V breaker shall be nominally 125 V DC ungrounded. The closing coil shall operste over a rqHe of 90 to 140 volts. The tripping coil shall operate over a range of 70 volts and 140 vous.

Since the breakers may be required to operate at any time and t at any range of soceptable battery vohage the ICAVP review attempted to vertfy that adequate vohage was always available at the clos 6n0 and tripping coils, especially durin0 minimum DC bus voNage.

We could not locate any calculations whidi evaluated control cable voMage drop, therefore we could not confirm that the breakers are always operable, nevien- l venid invand Noseed Date initialers Womer,L y e D 12/17/97 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A -

0 0 12/1787 VT Mgr: schapter Don K D D D t2/2wr m e ete.in: em Anand x e i O tarsier Date:

WWAUD:

Date:

nasoLUTm:

.t . "; hianuAed by Nu? Q Yes @l No NonOteerepardCondWon?Q Yes (9) No neestumen pene net O vos @ No neeshaion un, ed t O vee

• No moview Aseestable Not^~T

• Needed Deh mg vt Laod: No,t, Archeny A O -

0 VT usr: schapser, Den K sic cio : sm Anand K D D D Date:

SL Cenenents:

Prtnha 1mes 11:10 44 AM Pese 1 or 1

Nwtheast Utmees ICAVP DR No. DRW848H umaea w ur* 3 Discrepancy Report nwtow GrJup: 7.m 2: DR VALD noview Elesnant: Chego Presses Olseipime:18C %

O v.

Olmerspeney Type: Preseen implementehen g) g systemerseens: HVX NRC signiesense M* 4 Oste faxed to NU:

Date Pubhehed: 1/1o9e i

. -e Vendor manual chan0e without implementing dooumont.

Daeription: DCN DMS-84074-94 6nstalled a replacement pressure gaupe; however, no Vendor manual update is referenood as an effected .

document. Vendor information/documordation should have been TE-:::-M in conjunction with the modification documentation for

, maintenence purposes per station procedure DC4, Rey,0, dated 7/1/94. No implemordinsidistribution form (Attachment 8) was provided when requested from NU. The status of the effeded vendor manual is indeterminate.

newesw Volid invaded Needed Date inittster: DembrowsN, Jim @ Q Q 12/1497 VT Laod: Ryan, Thomme J -

O D 12/2247 VT tier: Schopfer, Den K Q D Q 12/2347 1RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K .

O O 52/85>'7 Dm:

DAfALD:

Date:

mEsoLUTION:

[ prevenuely identemed by Nut U vos @ No Non Deserspent Caneten?O vos @ No neeshmenPeannetO va @ No neechmenuntee*estO vos @ No ne* w Innister (none)

VT Leed: Rpn. Themes J O O O VT Mgr: Schopfer, Den K O O O l

1RC ohen: Sergh,reend K b

Date:

i SL Cenenente:

l

+

Prmled 1/r/De 11:11:10 AM Pope 1 or 1

Northeast UWWes DCAVP DR ** DR*8* 8 l

M m es m e u nit 3 Discrepancy Report Newtow ansup: sydam Os4yAuD j

mwk n e6.ansed: temtkeaan Demon ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, w Deestpone: h * )

O vee Desersponey Type: Campenerd Das g) g sj_ . Hvx letc tiensteenee twel: 4 Does faxed to NY:

Date Puhashed: 1MD98 suserspewys PDCR MP3 95-067 Hazards Review Desertphun: PDCR MP3 95-067 installed eight safety-related elocirk: heaters  !

in the component cooieng water pump area of the auxiliary buliding.

Each unN heater has an integret fan which adds a potential miselle source in the eres. This potontlat hazard was not adtkensed in the safety evolustion for the modification, malew Valid invelld insuled Oste ink.ater: head, M. D. O O O i2ririer VT Land: Nort, Angleny A O O O 12'7*'

VT thyr: Schep8er, Den K -

O '2/: 5 7 litC CNnn: Sergi, Anand K Q Q es 12/31/97 Date:

WWALD.

Date:

MEe0LUTION:

~

~

piwlously henneland by Nut U vee @ No Men D.aerepent Condellen?Q vos @ Ne Reeeeution PendinetO vee (+3 we m unteeeevedr O vos @ we

n. m initieser. (none)

VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A VT Her: Schapfer, Den K O g iRC Cnenn: % An.no K Date:

O b O SL Comments.

(. '

t l

PrHed 1/r/9811:11:38 AM Pope 1 of 1 r

?

• oR we, oR4sP3481s j w uunnes CAVP isinsowM unit : Discrepancy Report [i j neveem emup: canaposeen envaue  ;

Red'* 8l'"8's: mymen Desip ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,

j 4 P 'samen'elDeele (-)y,,  !

gleempsesy Type: Omeg g3 g, eyesenemeses: Hvx -

MIo tigdesenselone: 4 Does Palled se NO:

f l Date Pdeshed: 1/104s j

. .. Drew 6ng Discrepanoles betwoon CEs and TSO2 esse $elen: The following dienrepencies were dieoovered during the review j[

of Cwdult Support Lo9e(CSL) and the cable & Racewey Control r Program (T802) for the HVX System. All drawines have been i vertnad as cunent, valid deelen drew 6nes with no open chan0e '

documents por the Generat6on Records information Tracking System (GRITS). >

1. CSL 12179fSK42898 Reviolon 2A lists conduit 3CC2070M as an assoolsted conduit, however, TSO2 does not i ind60ste that conduit 3CC:$70M attaches to support AB 2398,

2. T802 Ind60stos that conduit 3CC2070H . attaches to support i AS 2398, however, CSL 121MSK32396 does not show that  ;

conduit as an manaaldd condult. j

3. CSL 121MSK AB 3006 Revision 2E lists conduit  !

3CC233NU as an had condult, however. TSO2 does not indioste that conduit 3CC233NU attaches to support AS 3608.

4. TSO2 Ind60stes that conduit SCC 233NA attaches to support AS 3608, however, CSL 12?MSK AS 3006 does not show this  ;

conduit as an assoolated con:luit.

6. CSL 121MSK AB 4208 Revlolon SA lists E&DCR F J 39025  :

as e qualinostion document for the support and its conduitsc however, TSO2 does not indioste that the E&DCR is a 1 quellAcellon document for the support. l I

S. CSL 121MSK44A-0014 Revlolon 48 lists conduit 3CC106PF as an associated conduit, however, T802 does not 4

have a listing for this conduit T802 does indioste in ths support l Informadon soroon that the drawing shows conduit SCC 106PF but it is not listed in TSO2.  !

.1

7. CSLs 12179fSK AS4388 Revision 1 and 121MSK AB- l 4200 Reviolon 1 list conduk 3CC933PV as an associated ,

consult, however T802 does not ind6cate that onnduit 3CC983PV attaches to supports AS4288 or AS4200.

l L T802 Indlostes that conduit 3CC133PA1 attaches to supports AHMS and AS4200, however, CSLs 121MSK-AB4288 and 121MSK AS4200 do not show this conduit as an manaalaaed condult.

9.' CSL 121MSK AB-5716 Revision 2C lists conduit 3CX104PPS as an maaaandad conduk, however TSO2 does not

...~_,.w__.~u,,,_m,

--...w , v -- ww ,

, w ,.w l i l~

t

---,,.,e.-., , ,n,, , n,-,n-a -,.n--~..,. . ,~,.---~-~.-...-~.,-,-,..-_--.-,--.--1 - - - . - - - - - - - - -

4 Northeed Umtles N3AVP M No. M&84815 .

m orm ure Discrepancy Report l nom.

Vand hoveW Needed Date bdusters tener,T.L 0 0 O 12/57/87 l n L=d: N.i. A*** A O O O $2 m ? ,

vt w: **,w. tm x 0 0 O $2 m 7 52 =

inC oNeoi: se e , w x 0 O u Date:

INVAup:

Date: ,

RE80LAlfl0N:

~

M/ f;idonellied by NWf U Yes T) No Non Deserspent CommelenfQ Yes (4) No a=*mnrenmetO va @ No n =

• m n u.o=

• edt O v a @ No novtow Not Aeoeptable Needed Date bduster: (none)

VT Lead: Net, Awwy A O O O w Nor: sapen,oen x 0 0 0 O

IRC C8enn: Singh, Anand K g

- Dele:

SL Commente:

l l

Printed 117/9811:12.10 AM %2W 2 l

BCAVP M N' DR 88P84818

, Northeast uusines metone ut* 3 Discrepancy Report  !

nwesw enouP: coneywsmen onvaun nw*e stemme sysem basensinn oiems a=: ia e ome o y, Discrepeney Type: Irmessumon ..m.2 .

gg i systemerseess: Qas '

NRc tientanean le et: 4 Dane FAXest to NU:

Date Pubilehest: 1/1 Mis bC's instNment installation implementation l t: U .' During rystem walkdowns the follow 6ng installation discrepancies were discovered. These d6screpancies have the potential of affecting the accurecy and performance of the assoolated equipmeM.

1 ElectricalInstallation Specification E350 Rev 9, paragraph 1.10.2.1.e Wales that all electrical conduM connections shall be tipM. CoMrary to this requiremeM the conduM fitting at Iristrument 3LMS*PT935 is loose such that it can be tumed by hand.

2. Tubirg Installation Specification SP EE 212 Rev 1, page 24, pergraph 3 states 'Any tubig located so that it may be stopped on by personnel shall be protoded by a barrier strong enough to '

support at least 440lbs.' Contrary to this requirement the tubing to instruments 3RSSTE38A and 2S8YE388 is located in a high traff6c eroa without any protecticn. Also, scaffolding is currently installed such that it touches the tubing which causes more treff6c in the area of the tubing.

3. The following documeMs state that the use of Teflon Tape for sealing of instrument connections is fortddden and that grafoil tape shall be used as the thread sealant: l&C TOnical Bulletin

1. 102, Tubing Installation SpeWestion SP EE 212, and Piping Installation Specification SP ME.570. CoMrary to the above requirement instruments SQSS-PT30A and SQSS-PT31 A have Teflon tape appl 6ed to their threaded connodions.

4. Electrical installation Sosoification E350 Rev 9, paragraph 1.10.2.1.b states *All equipment shall be cleaned inside and outside, with no tools, rubbish or scrap materials left on or within any part of it." Contrary to this requirement 3CES*lPNL1P and 3CE8'IPNL10 contained excessive fo@ metal debris inside the cabinets. Or i of the instruments Ir. aide 3CES*lPNL1P had a stripped picos oi wire touching the formed edge of the instrumeM next to an energized terminal.

novow ,

veed inveN Nomhed Date I insister server. T. t O O- 0 12'i757

, vt tese wwi. ^a'** ^ O O O $N7 i vr uen sensed ,0.nx G O O im7 wec camn: s* ^a'd K G D D 12tais7 i Oste:

DNALB:

~

Prmted 1/7/ss 11:12.35 AM Pege 1 of 2 l

i i

t K:AVP m m mes4 sis

, Nenheast utiuses M m unn Discrepancy Report j Dees:

metoum0N.

ra/ ";leanused by NUf U Yes @ No Nonthesepeticondmon?U Yes @ No neeshmenpenenet O va @ Ne nomehmen-r0 ya @ Ne nev6.w Acomptable Not W e Needed Dole mg n Lead: Nwl, Away A O O a W Ingri tehspfer, Den K me ca.nn: %wK O u O Date:

SL Conenente Prtnted 1/7m 11:12 30 AM Page 2 of 2

North e uomi ICAVP DR

• DR N "

mielsew w unit Discrepancy Report n e,: c n onvALs a*** *=a=*: *ra"" la"**'a p w o, ha ,i D=wm: is e D=en o y, Dl r.p.ney Typ.: Insteenten inge.m.ntsten gg l S,----  ? 044 '

8eto tiensa w 6w.i:4 Date FAm.d te No:

O.to Pubheh.d: 1.NOW9s

. -,i instrument Label 6ne l D rWl.a: Procedure OA 9 Revision 1 provbes the directions for the correct pierd labeling procedure for all compcnents. The procedum provides guidence to maintain a standardized I

abeling Program for Milletone Station er.d Indicates that all field ,

devices be labeled Contrary to t%se requirements, as part of the physical plant walkdowns, the fol6owing instruments were found to not be labeled in the field.

00306818548 OD3R88-PS41A DD3RSS-PS418 DD3QSS-LD/931 DDSQSS LD/932 nwi vens invens me Dm.

12/17s7 Intest.r: 5.nw, T. L G O i IM7 Vit s: wei Answy A Q Q O viMen sehen,oaak O O O im7 see ca n: sm An.nd K O O O 12/3157 Det :

INVALID:

D.t.: ,

PtstOLUTION:

emi ey w. nun.e my wur o v.

• u. m.no m,er ec. nam.ar o v T.7 w.

n hm.ne.nanerO va @ m. n hmenune *.sr0 va @ ==

n.*w P Nm A eptahl. No.d.d Det.

%g VT La.d: Nort, Arthony A O O VT Men 5.hopeer, Den K O g stC Chan: Sineh, An.nd K D.h.:

O b O l SL Cen.nant.*

1 I

~

Prtre.d 1/741811;13 04 AM Page 1 or 1 j

- - - - . - . - - . _ . - . - . - - - . - ~ . - - . - . ._

DR ik,. DR 4APS 4818 mm lC g p  ;

muleme unit s Diacrepancy Report l mestes ereup: synes, - envaub

""" """

• peeeness operanseylesw t

""**""""'"'D"*" O vos  !

- eesseepenny Types cateusseen gg [

eyneesernesse: Dom l IIRC elenlosenselevet: 4 Date faxed to 9fu' estepeeshoe titoes

.. Panel Loesne CE

;r.:M InvoMng e*h% NL 030 l essenssion: ealr=hian NL 02 (Rev.1, CCN N) j

1. Assumption 2 states that the coloulation uses the resuRs of ean*=Maan NL 038 for estermint.'te the minimum vota0e of the i inotor control corders feed'90 the panois, however Cal',ulation  ;

'l NL 042 is now the tsaarud=8&an of record for minimum bus volta 0e and should be used fa' eninimun, bus volta 0es.

f 2. Assumption 2 states that the minimum motor cordrol conter i volta 0s was used in ':'_ w##,i the arr.pacity of the transformer primary cabios, but 200 vous was used fo. three phase panois l

and 240 volts for single phase penois to determine the rating of the treneformer secondary cables (and was also used in determining the indMdual panel loads), in order to be consisterd, and sinos the data le readily avaliable, the minimum '

panel venapes provided in e al'=hia9182E (Rev.1, CCN #1) should be used for determing the treneformer escondary cables ,

and the a,vipecity of the panel loads (e.0.,186 vohs instead of 200 volts for the treneformer escondary cables of Penel 30CA-PNL6N, and 214 vous instead of 240 volts for the treneformer i

secondary cables of Panois 38CA-PNL8N and SCA PNL9N, whh a teouNant volta 0e at tha panel load devices of 106.7 volts for Panel 38CA PNL6N and 107.0 volts for Panels 38CA PNL8N .

and SCA-PNL9N). The use of 208 volts and 240 volts presordly used by Calculation NL 030 is not conservative.

3. On CCN #1 Pape 3, the total load of 40 VA is computed for only 8 pressure efferential swuchos but this circuit has 10 '

pressure efferenties soliches (a total load of 50 VA).

4. In Appendix C, the Service Volta 0s for Cable SSCA8NL036 is shown as 4e0vAC for the trenefomer escondary. The actual Servios Volta 0s le 200VAC.

t

5. In Appendix C, the Servios Volta 0s for Cable SSCABNL031 ,

is shown as 200VAC for the treneformer escondary. The actual i service Vona0 is 240VAC.

4. In Appendix A. Circuits 11 and 15 of Panel 38CA-PNL9N and Circulls 6,8,12, and 14 of Panel 38CA PNL6N use a diversity  :

factor of 0.8 in computing the indvidual circuit loed, but then a 0.8 dversity factor is applied to the totai land on Peneis SSCA -

PNLtN and 38CA PNL6N. Aneumption 1 only stalas that e -

evesity factor is appened to the total panel loed, it seems that the eversity femor was applied once too onen for these loads ,

and should not have been applied to the in&vidual circuit load.

Pelosilhos 11:1332 AM pese 1 or 2

t Northoest Utmeos ICAVP m me m w m is museerm ut* 3 Discrepancy Report f

7. Br. Appendix A, the unit heelers of Penol 38CA PN4.6N eneume e power femor of 0.6, roeulting in a circuit load of 414 ,

VA. Unit heelers of the same ratin0 (some even from the same spoolhostion) ers shown in Circuits 11 and 12 of Panel SSCA.  :

PNL4N and Circuit 9 of Panel SSCA PNL9N but are shown with [

e load of 248 VA. These should oil have the same load (i.e.,414 VA),

l noview I Vand hweed Needed Oste l

inittster: Mandal.D.J. O g Q 12/1M7 12/1H7 VT Laod: Nort, Arthony A Q 12/2W7 VT Mgr: Sehester, Den K Q Q  :

- 12/3 ,s7 stC cienn: s w =dK a n Date:

WWAUD:

Date:

REe0LLifloN:

M / 4 leanseedtryNUF V Yes @ No NonDeseropontCommeenfC Yes (9) Ne ,

Resolul6en PeannetO yee @ No --untee.evedtO yee @ No nev6.w Aeceptakte Not Acceptekee Needed Date g,,g,,,,3 p)

VT Land: Nort, Anthony A O O O VThegr sehspear, Den K O O IRC Clenn: singh, Anand K Date:

elCornments:

l l

l i

l l

PfMed 1/T/9611:13 36 AAA Page 2 er 2 j

mgm gAyp on m.on m ie t

miseseetw unit s Discrepancy Report neve w arme: syneem onvAun newtow seemem: syneem Desten oisessene: Einetand Damien g y,,

einerepeney Type: commmen g, e,_ _ n- Dax Isac signeameneelevet: 3 Date Faxed le Nu-Doesruhashed titoss o66ererener: D6ecrepanoles involving Calculation 100E

Dearipeten:

Calculdion 190E (Rev. .)

1. On Pages 6 and 7, the allowable host generated by the tripleA ,

350 MCM cable should road 21,594 wetts and not 25,194 watts.

2. On Page 6, the maximum design load Ior Motor Control Center 3EHSEC151 is identif*j as 360.75 amps. This or%wds the maximum allowable value of 211 amps shown in Calculation 129E (CCN #3, Rev. 0) Tab 6e 3 on Page 6.

3. References are made to calculations whloh have been superseded (e.g.,93E,116E,146E). References should be made 10 calculations wh6cn are still edive and valid (i.e.,

updated),

newtow Vend invahd Needed Da6e inlitetw: kendet.D.J. Q Q Q 12'1697 O 12/1657 VT Lead: Nerl. Anthony A O O 12t22s7 vimen nahepen,nonx 0 O 12/31/97 Inc Clenn: sorgh, ArmM K Q Date:

WWALS:

Date:

Mn0LUTION.

Provleue8y ideneNied by Nut Q Yes @ No NonDescrepentCanelless?O Yes @ No noseluelenPending?O vos @) No - - i.s,se evedt O vos Ce) No  ;

noview l m gn,,,) AnwAsele NotAW h Namled Date VT Leed: Nerl, Anthony A O O O ,

VT Her: schopfer, Den K I utC Ctenn: singh, Anand K Does:

el Cenenenes:

Preited 1/r# 11:1402 AM Page1 or g l

ICAVP .* No.DR W 3 E ]

Nenheest Utmtl.o mastern Unit 3 Discrepancy Report  !

movtow aroup: synen DRvAuD  !

Nortow 8twned: Dretwn Deelri w opwehmer >

"**"N D"*" O va ,

pleonpaney Type' Convenert Dale g g,  ;

s,_ - '-

- N/A NRC SignlAsense level: 4 Date Faxed w NU:

Date puhitehed: 1/1098 Demerspency: Calcokation D6soropanoles in Nomenclature and in Representing Data l D w eHyeon: A. Calculation SP M3-EE.342 (Rev.1)

The equipment number *3HVRTLT 38 J838' is incorredly shown as *3HVRTLT.33 JB38' throughout the talculation.

8. Calculation NL 025 (CCN M. Rev. 3)

The equipment number '3HVRTLT38'should be

'3HVRTN138'in Attachment 4 Pape 15.

newtow vesd kr,end Needed Date O 12/iar97 inleisten kendel.D.J. O O O O $2rtse7 VT Laod: Neri,ArdhenyA O 12r2397 YT hepr: schepser, Dori K Q Q tarsise7 IstC Chan: A4ngh, Arend K O O Date:

leWALIO:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

7.;;'r";idenamed by NW7 U Yee (9) No Non DLetepent Condition?Q Yee @ No

==h pendiastO vee @ No ResoluttenUnroseevedtO vee @ No Revtow Aeoeptende Ned Aeoeptehle Needed Date m,g VT Leed: Nort, Archeny A VT begr: schepfer, Deri K IRC Chmn: SkWi, Anand K O b O Date:

SL Commmes:

i l Page 1 of 1 Prtnted teT/9611:14.29 W

,_. . . , _ . _ ___ ~ _ . . _ _ . , . -

Nwtheast im ICAVP on m. onwsman Mienstem unit a Discrepancy Report neveen emap: sistem DavAun newtow emment: oystem Deep ,,,,,,

oleespons: tww" "*

O vos Disempeney Type: Dreetg

@) No e, _-  : Dax NRC tignhaanse level: 3 Date faxed 6o NU:

Date Padualshed: 1/1096 neeerspency: palo Eu.117A Rev.10 Emergency Generator Fuel Oil 3ystem, Rev6ew of pipin0 line 0 <

2 DescriP# eat Pip 6no size calculations were i,4 .rund. This would be the type of calculation that addressed huid velocity and pressure drop over the expected range of operation. The trarder pump calculat6on P(B)-0700 indirectly verifies the main pipe header to tile day tanks, but the belance of the pipin0 has not been addroceed.

Of particular concem is the gravity drain line from each day tank to it's respedive AC or DC fuct oil pump. Since the line flows by gravity, it must be sized for maximum flow rates and with minimal pressure loss.

nev6ew Valid %relid Needed Date Q 12/1w7 inntster: Ruse, Earl. @ 12/in7

.T

• end: Nort, A,e'm/A ' O O VT Mgri tehopter Den K G O O $2/2 w 7 94C Ctenn: Singh, Anand K Q 12/3147 I

Date:

WWALS:

l Dele: j REe0LUTtoN.

~

provteusty idensted by NUf O ves @) No HanOteerepentCondalen?U vos @) Ne RosetusenpendinetO va @m - unroe*edt O va @ No Review Wa Not ? - , Needed Date VT Lead: Nerl,heony A O O VT Mgr Leaser, Den K O IRC C4enn: singh. Anand K O b b )

i Date:

SL Canonents:

l Prtnled 1/7/9811:15M AM Pese1or1 i

i l

l t

~~, - - - . . - . . _ . . , _ . . , _ . . , _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ , _ , _ , . . _ _ _ , _ . . . _, _.

DR Nc, DR MPW24 met m K:AVP minietore unit 3 Discrepancy Report moview aroup: eramm OnvAuD newtow enament: sy sm Design tuostpone: unchantant Desi'" O y=

Deseropency Type: DronMg g s, _- -  : oax M signiacanoe M 4 Date FAXad to NU:

Date Published.1/1096 Deserepeney: Pipe segment, valve and Pipe ciaes missmatch between P&lD and PDDS and Pipe isomertic

, cmetpelen: On P&lD EM 117A, Revision 10, Eme't)ency Genes 6 5 Fuel oil System, at co-ord E 5 there is a line numbered 3 EG. -600413 and a cioeed valve numbered 'V950, However, this line number 8s not listed in PDOS and when compared io the physical esometric drawing 121)4-CP 360510, sheet 1 of 3, this line number, its reducer and valve *V950 are not shown. Also, it is apparent that there is a class change immedi6tly aner valve

• V979, although the P&lD shows a class change aner valve

'V950.

Note that revision 9 of this P&lD also shows this current (Rev 10) arrangement, neview Vetd invalid Needed Date 12'18s7 inteleter: Ruse,Lort. .

Q VT Laod: Nort, Anthony A B D D 12 ass 7 vr mer: schapNr. Den x 0 0 O $2/2as7 sic chen: sy, Anand x 12tsis7 0 O Dele:

INVAUD:

Date:

Issatu UTION:

7... r, identined by NUf C Yes @ No Non Discrepent condelion?(.) Yes @ No W%pendine?Q na @ No u m unros s ed? O v a @ No neweew P Not ? - , Needed Date g

VT W: Nort, Anthony A O O G si Mer schopfer, Den K mcw c m Anand x 0 hete:

at.Commente:

i i

{

i l

Pnnted 1/rse 11:15'32 AM Pagt 1 or 1

w imani.- ICAVP DR No. M 44M26 Maistorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report nodew arew: system envaun nedew shonent: syehm Design  %

olestrans: Elumw ossi'" O vee Discrepeney Type: Dro*g

@ No ayesenwevesese: oox

Nnc signiacenselevel

4 EWAXed to NU:

Dak Nhnehed.1/1096 OlmeroponeF: AC Elementary / Schemat6c diaGramsE fx4 iEct the wiring

diagrams.

Descripeten: a) There are cases where the AC Elemer tary Dia0 rana do not match the wiring diagrams in regards to it e connections of the current transformer secondary, as examrAes:

AC Elementary Diagram EE 21R, for Service Water Pump 38WP*P1 A Indicates that terminal poird B3 is connected to poir;t 5 of the 3000/5 current transformer (Mem ZC as iddntified in the wiring diagram). Wirin0 digram 25212 30010 sht.447 indicates that the terminal poirW 83 is connected to poim 5 of the 100/5 outreed transformer (Mem ZB as identified in the wiring dia0 rams). The w6 ting diagram does indicate the correct wiring at the respedive currett transformer terminals, but not at the terminal blocks. Similar condMions exist on the Service Water Pump 38WP*P1C terminal point C2 (on the 50/5 current transformer) and on the CVCS Charging Pump 3CHS*P3A terminal point 82 (on the 3000/5 current transformer).

Other similar condMions are located on the 3000/5 current transformer connections for 3CCP*P1C (terminal point 84) and for 3CHS*P38 (terminal point 82). Ref. AC Elementary

Diagrams EE-21N, EE 21V, & EE 21Y.

b) AC Elementary Drawin0 EE 21W ind6 cates a 2300 ohm grounding resistor for the 4200/120 Vac potential transformer ]

34D 2H. The wiring diagram 25212 30010 sht. 401 Indicates a <

resistance value of 223 ohms, c) AC Elementary Drawing EE 21X indicates that the dirodional i overcurrent relays (67NTB & 67NAR), in the Diesel Generator <

Neutral CT circuit, are conneded in series with " terminal 5* of 67i4TB connected to the X1 terminal o' the Aux CT and

• terminal 6* of 67NTB conneded to " terminal 5' of the 67NAR relay. The corresponding wiring diagrams indicate that " terminal 6* of

, 67NTB la connected to the X1 terminal of the CT and " terminal l 5' of 67NTB is conneded to " terminal 6* of 67NAR.

d) Schematic diagram ESK-5DS Indicates that contact 1-5 from j A0astat timin0 relay 62W-3 ENS 802 is connected in between contads from lockout relay 86HGB-3ENSB07 (contact 11) and from the "DG Ready to Load

• relay 3 3EGSB05 (corWact 8-2).

The conospondin0 wiring diagrams indicates that contad 6-2 (3-3 ENS 805) is wired in-between contads 1 5 (62W 3ENSB02) .

and contad 11 (86HG8-3 ENS 807). l noview wees . Invens messed none j

^ - ' ^

l Martart R. 12/1WB7 Pnnied ims611:16A8 AM Page 1 of 2 i

L l 1 i

/

Northeast unties ICAVP- a m. memas usatone unit 3 Discrepancy Report

" 12/1H7 Walater: Menen, M. Q Q Q VT Lead: Nort, Arnheny A O O O $ 2"7 vf Men senepler DenK O O O 12/2 n 7 me cm c sm Anand x 0 O O

• Date:

mAm.

w Date:

nE80LUTION:

In/: ?/ Identened by NUT U Yes @ No . Non D6eerepant CondIUon?Q Yes @ No na

• mnPonenetO va @ No n=**ea unt *.drO va @ No ne*w AccepeaWe Not ? - ;^ "- Needed Date VT Lead: Nort, Ardhony A VT Mgr: Schepser, Don K IRC Cnmn: Sengh, Anand K Dele:

O b -

SL Conenents:

r i

i l

l Pnnted 1(14811:16.51 AM PeGe 2 of 2

.- , . . . . ~ . . -.. . _ . . - .

M No, MW3428 me umme. EAVP umetone unit 3 Discrepancy Report nwiew arei,: syenom on VALD nwtow moment: syetem Deelen ,,,,,,,,o ,,,,u ,y3,,,,

Dissipane: ElecMoel Deel'"

O vee Desempeney Type: Dmains g g, s,1 .-- ' Dox NRC alenlacense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date PuWhehed. 1/1Q98 r . - :y: 4.16 Ky wiring diagram discrepencies.

Descripdaa: a) AC Elementary drawin0 EE 21W Indicates an electrical connedion between the NGV undervoltege relay (device 270) terminal point 5 and the synchronizing relay (GXS) terminal point

6. This connedion is made through terminal block KK point 9.

Terminal point KK 9 indicates a connedion to the undervoltage relay, device 270 point 5 (ref. drawing 25212-39010 sht. 491).

The undervoltage relay (device 270) does not Indicate a connection to Terminal point KK 9 (ref. drawing 25212-39010 sM. 492). A similar condition exists on drawin0 25212-39010 sht 440 between terminal point KK 9 and the HGA alarm relay 74D terminal point 5 (ref. AC Elementary drawing EE 21P).

b) Wiring diagram 25212 39010 sht. 493 Indicates a connection from terminal block G points 7 & 8 to handswitch (device 43) points 14C & 180. Synchronizing handswitch (device 43) is shown on wiring diagram 25212 39010 sht. 494. Wiring diagram 25212-39010 sM. 494 does not indicate a connedion at device 43 points 14C & 180.

noview vend invand Needed Deie inteletor: Morton R. O O O 12/i n 7 VT Laod: Nort, Arthony A O O O 52ttes7 vT uer: so pw, Don K O O O 12/23 7 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K G O O $2/31/97 Date:

INVALID:

Date:

nEsoLUTioN:

Previouslyidenstead by Nu? U vos @ No NonDiscrepentCondaien?Q vos @ No

-renenetO va @ Ne W'MtO v= @ No

n. view AccepteWe Net Ad=Tm Needed Date VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A VT Ingr: Schopfer. Don K mc ch n: sinen. Anone K O O O O O O Date:

sL Cenenents:

~

Prtneed 1/751611:18.33 AM Page 1 of 1 1

Netheast UtNWes ICAVP M No. MW3431 l Minetaw unit 3 Discrepancy Repoft moview aroup: connewomen onVAun moview eaement: syneem inessaemon ,

D w ,m :ia e o=en o y, DiserepencyType:Inessaamm:. ---- .

g, eyesenvprocess: swp WIC signeteense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date published: 1/1046 Disoreponer. Inappmpriate Sealit:g of instrument connection Desert >#en: The following documents state that the use of Teflon Tape for sealing of instrument connedions is fortMden and that grafoil .

tape shall be used as the thread sealant: l&C Technical Bulletir.

1. 102 Tubino Installation Specification SP-EE 212, and Piping installation Specification SP-ME 570.

Contrar to 2:e above requirement the following instruments were observed, during the system walkdowns, to have Teflon Tape applied to their threaded connections: 3SWP*FIS36A, 3SWP*PDIS163, 3SWP Pl134A, and 3SWP Pl1348, noview Veild invalid Needed Dele insister; sener,T.L y 12/1s47 VT Leed: Nerl, Anthony A y 12/1847 VT Mgr; schapter, Don K -

O $2/22s7 WIC C8enn: singh, Anand K g Q 12/31/97 l Dene: l l WWALD: i Date:  !

MEsOLUTloN.

I' Previously identined by tau? O Yes @ No NonDiscrepentCondition?Q Yes @ No t

-perennetO Ya @ No n=* man unr=*edtO Yee @ No l

n. view i g,gg,g,,; g P Not Wh Needed Does '

VT Leed: Nerl, Anthony A O O VT Mgr: schapter, Don K i NtC Chmn: singh, Anand K g g Date:

sL Conienente:

l l

Prtnted t/7/9611:19:o3 AM Page1 or 1

mgm ICAVP on m. m m os32 misimone unit 3 Discrepancy Report nwies, emup: system DaVAuD moview mammt system pesign ,,,,,,,,

O vee Desempeney Type: 0% gg systemoressee: oox NnC Signiecense twel: 4 Date FAAed to NU:

Date Pubilohed 1/i M 6 Desem,ency: Confhet6n0 information Between PDDS and P6pe isometric Drawings D ueripehm: Regarding P&lD EM-177A, Rev.10, Pipe line numbers 3-EGF-001057 3 through 3-EGF-001060 3, there is a discrepency in that the applicable pipe design table, CL 01b2, requires schedule 40 weQht pipe, but the PDOS system shows the pipe as schedule 10 weight. The isometric drawings are not definitive in that they show 10s,40s and 80s information The isometric drawings are CP 360530 (9&11) and CP 36053 (16&20).

Also, for pipe line numbete J-EGF-002-026 3 and 3-EGF-002-031 3, PDDS show pipe well thickness as standard weight,

- whereas pipe table CL 0151 shows schedule 80. The pipe isometrics CP-360252, CP 360519 and CP-360537 do not show the well schedule, noview Vand invand Needed Date initiater: nume,Eart. O O O 12ris/e7 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony ^ O O O $ 2/'"7 VT My schopfer, Don K O O O 12rzui7 Re Chmn: singn, Anand K O O O 12rsi/s7 Date:

INVALID:

Date:

nEsOLLmoN.

T../ 7 heentiend by Nu? O Yes @ No NonDeserspentcondetton?O Yes @ No meenenetO va @ No p % unreseevedr O v a @ No

^'

n.wi.w Acceptable Not ? ,

Needed Date VT Leed: Nerl, Ardheny A VT Mer: sonopter, Den K Rc Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:

SL Commente.

Prtreed 1M9611;ie:34 AM Pege 1 of 1

DR No, MM-0833 -

,~ Northeast Ummes ICAVP MiBetor's ur*

• Discrepancy Report Reveow eree,: system omVAuD Review thaunt: syenem Deen pieelpene:I a c

• O va pleeroponey Type: celmhmen g g, ,

sp_ ? - - Dox istC alpmeneense level: 3 Date faxed to NU:

Does Pubsehee.1/1098 Deseropency: Calculation methodology vs. RG 1.105 committnent for SP-3EGA 1,SP 3EGF 10,SP 3 EGO-4,5,8,12,SP 3EGS 12 Dem g elon: The colmistions described below document the vendor's process notpoint values but do not analyze the impact of instrument inaccuracy, calibration uncertainty, and instrument drift upon -

their respor: live Category 1 instruments. No bases for selecting instrument setpoint values is documented.

1. Calculation SP 3EGA-1 documents the setpoint for pressure switches 3EGAPS28A1, A2,81, and B2 that trigger an alarm on low air start header pressure for the Emergency Diesel's starting air reservoirs.

2. Calculation SP 3EGF.10 documents the setpoint for pressure switches 3EGFPS34A and B that trigger en alarm and start the Emergency Diesel's respective Auxiliary Fuel Oil Pumps, 3EGFP2A and B, on low fuel oil pressure.

3. Calculation SP-3 EGO-4 documents the setpoint for pressure switches 3EGOPS23A1, A2, A3, and B1, B2, B3 that trigger an alarm and stop the respective Emergency Diesels on any two-out of three switch actuations on low ;abe oil pressure.

4. Calculation SP-3 EGO-5 documents the setpoint for pressure switches 3EGOPS21 A and B that trigger an alarm on low rocker arm tube oil pressure for the Emergency Diesels

5. Calculation SP-3 EGO-8 documents the t,etpoint for pressure switches 3EGOPS24A and B that trigger an alarm on high crankcase pressure for the Emergency Diesels.

6. Calculation SP 3 EGO-12 documents the setpoint for level switches 3 EGO *t.S40A and B that trigger an alarm on low lube oil reservoir level for the Emergency Diesels.

7. Calculation SP 3EGS-2 documents the setpoint for temperature switches 3EGS*TS30A and B that trigger an alarm on low Jacket water heater temperature for the Emergency Diesels, nev6ew vond invaad Nomied Date inetister: Reed,winnen. m O 12/1947 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A @ Q Q 12/1947 VT Mor: schep er, Den K p

G O O 12t23s7 IRC Clunn: Sergh, Anand K O O i2tsii97 Date:

Prtnled 1/7/9s 112c:03 AM ~~ Page 1 or 2

.' Northeast utsties ICAVP M h. M4P3 0433 M8"* Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Date:

RESOLUTION,

.t? :^, Identened by NUF V vos @ No Non Descrepent Cenellen?U vos @ No

-%,enenetO va @ No noe m e . unr.e m .dr O va @ we ne*w Acceptohte Not W h Needed Date

%g VT Leed: Nerl, Arewry A Q VT Mer: Schapser, Den K O g

. - = - - - a B o Date:

SL Commente:

Prtrend if1/9611307 AM Peps 2 of 2

ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0434 Northeast utsties Mmeterm ut* 3 Discrepancy Report moview orow: syneem DRvAuD w w sistan Design ,,,,,,,,g ,,,,,,,y ,,,,, l m: l a c Dee" O veo l

, -y Type: NW g s,__ - m Dax NRC SignMcenee levd 3 Date faxed to NU:

Does Pubtlehed.1/1o96 I Deserspency; Non conservatism & calculation methodology vs. RG 1.105 l commitment for SP 3EGS-6. l r >- Calculation SP-3EGS4 documents the setpoint for level switches 3EGStS34A and B that trio 0er an alarm on low expansion tank level for the Emergency Diesels. However, this -

calculation does not analyze the impact of instmment inaccuracy, calibration uncertainty, and instrument drift upon the Category 1 level switch setpoint. Midtionally, the amount of water remaining in the expansion tanks at the low level setpoint was non conservatively calculated to be 178 gallons when, because of the tank's semi-elliptical heads, the remainin0 water volume may actually be less than 144 gallons.

Review Vaud invalid Needed Date initiator: Reed,Whom. O O 52/iss7 O

VT Land: Nort, Ardhony A @ Q 12/19/97 12/23/97 VT Mor: schop per, Don K Q inc chmn: sinch, Anand K G O 12/31/s7 Date:

ANALlo:

n.

Date:

f? ALUTioN

.".e." 7 hientleted by Nu? Q Yee $ No Non CL , "Comenion?Q Yes @ No w%Penene70 Yes @ Ne R e unroomved7 0 m @ No

n. view

, Not Wh Needed Date VT Lead: Nort, Arthony A VT Mgr: schopfer, Don K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K O O O Date:

al Cer,anente.

PrHed 1/7A1611:2032 AM Page 1 or 1

___ _ _. _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - ~ _ _ _ _ . _.

4 e

ICAVP DR No. DNS 4438 Northeast utsties Misiesono unit 3 Discrepancy Report noview ereup: syneem OnVAun noveew shment: system Deelen g,,,,

Olselptne: 14 C Deel'"

Deserereney Type: calomann Om f@ No eyesenwriesees: HVX NRc signIAmenee love: 3 Date faxed to NU:

• Does puhelehed: 1/109s Desempency; inoonect calculation methodology for: NSP 107.108,100,124-HVR, & SP-36WR 29 Desertpelen: The calculations described below incorredly calculate the

- Instrument setpoints for their respedive Fluid Components intomational (FCI) flow switches The tonn YS" (full scale) used -

throu0hout these calculations has been improperty associated with the nominal range of the switches in terms of the process (100 ft/sec); however, because of the nature of these switches, FS should have referred to the actual instrument (millivoit signal) ran0e of each switch as provided by the vendor (FCl) in the form of unique calibration curves and/or tables. After the probable uncertainties are calculated in millivolts, the resuJng process uncertainty ranges can be determined from the FCI calibration curves / tables.

1. Calculation NSP-107-HVR documents the setpoints for flow

witches SHVRYS52A and B which staat altemate supply fans, 3HVRYN14A and B respectively, on loss of flow from the primary supply fans.

l 2. Calculation NSP 106-HVR documents the setpoints for flow switches 3HVRYS98A and B which start attemate supply fans, l

3HVRYN13A and B rec 4metively, on loss of flow from the primary supply fans.

3. Calculation NSP 100-HVR documents the setpoint for flow switch 3HVRYS27B which provides a permissive si0nal to start exhaust fan 3HVRYN6A on low flow from exhaust fan 3HvRYH B.

4. Calculation NSP-124-HVR documents the setpoints for flow switches 3HVRYS102A and B, and 3HVRYS103A and B which start respective A/C units on loss of flow in the interconnectin0 ductwork.

l l 5 Calculation SP-3HVR-29 documents the setpoints for flow switches 3HVRYS88A and B which start redunderd exhaust fans,3HVRYN12A and B loversely, on loss of flow from the running fan.

noview vand invand neceded pese inliteter: Reed,Wutem. -

Q 12/1M7 Vrt.eed: Nerl, Anthony A Q Q 12/1s47 vr neon sehes en, con K G O 2/no7 50c Cteun: singh. Anand K Q Q 12/31/97 Dele:

l~

m m. __

! Prtnied 1/7/9s 112157 AM Pe0s 1 of 2 l

l

Q Northeast utstles ICAVP M No. MWm35 Mmetorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report O

Date:

itESOLLmoet 7..J" _' 'iidentlRed by NUf Q vos (9) No Non Discrepent Condaten?Q vos (@ No

-penenetO v. @ No neemmen-70 va @ No Review mg P Not We Needed Date VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A VT Mgr: Schapter, Den K WIC Clenn: Singh, Anand K g Date:

SL Comments:

1 l

I l

l l

l l

I PrWed 1/7/9611:21:01 AM peGe 2 of 2

Northeast UWWes ICAVP DR No. DRWW34 mistorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review oremy: system DRVAUD Revtow stenant: syetem Degn ,,,,,,,,

D6ssepene: I a C Desien O vm  :

Deserepeney Type: Cosmannen g g, systenspremese: .4vx NRc Signisonnen level: 3 Date FAXesl to pal:

Date Pubilehed.1/1W96

~

. 4. Calculation methodology vs. RG 1.105 commitment: NSP-097-HVR & SP 3HVP 5 l Desert P #en: The calculations described below document the vendor'a process setpoint values but do not analyze the imped of instrument inaccuracy, calibration uncerta!nty, and instrument drift upon their respective Category 1 instruments. No bases for selecting instrument setpoird values is documented.

1. Calculation NSP-097 HVR documents the setpoint for pressure controllers 3HVR*PIC104A and B that modulate inlet vanes 3HVR* MOD 140A and B respedively which are located on the suction side of fans 3HVRYN6A and B respectively which is part of the auxiliary building ventilation filtration syWem.

2. Calculation SP-3HVP 5 documents the setpoint for ,

temperature indicating controllers 3HVP* TIC 29A and B that modulate vanes 3HVP* MOD 20A,200,23A, and 26A, and 3HVP* MOD 208,200,238, and 268 respectively which are part of the emergency diesel generator enclosures' verdilation system.

Review '

Date  !

Valid invend Needed Initialer: Reed,WMom. O O 2/in7 12/1M7 VT Leed: Neri, Anthony A Q Q VT Mgr: Schopfer, Den X Q O O $2/23s7 1RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Q Q m 12f3147 Dele:

WWALD:-

Date:

RESOLUT!ON Previously hientined by Nu? O Yee @ No NonciecrepentCondition?O Yee @ No

- penene? O vos @ No Reeoamenunteemed?O vos @ No Review m, P Not Wh Neesied Dele VT Laod: Nerl, Anthony A VT Mgr; schepfer, Den K O O O IRc caran: sineh.Ansad K Date:

0 @  !

sL Conenente:

4 I

Prested 1/7ss 1121:26 AM PeJe 1 of 1 l

t I ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

o Northeast UtNties ICAVP_ M No. MM37 Ministorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report Newtow evoegr. Opersenne s Meiresnonce s'ul Toseng DR VallD Revlem elemesd: conessve Aomon Process peneipene: c Ow Deseropeasytype: con covo Acuan- g g, a,___ ._. a Hvx E 80e'Oesenes lovet: 4 gas, pag g go yu:

Date Putdished.1/1c/98 Demerspency: Procedures were not revised in sooordance to commitments Desatdien: Commitments wLre made in Licensee Everd Reports (LER) to make changes to administrative procedures. These procedures were to provide information to the Operators regstding planned openings into equipment, pipes, or structural boundaries.

LER 95 004-00 was written because evaluations have determined that historical biosches did not result in loss of safety function of the Control Room pressure boundary, but did involve noncompliance with Technical Specifica6ons. The actions to prevent recurrence will include procedure changes and Technical Specification changes to restore operational flexibliMy.

Commitment Records 12711,17775 and CR M3-97-1394 were written to track the completion of the corrective actions.

Special procedure SPROC 96 3-13, Cable Pull & Seal Installauon in Electrical Penetration Openings in Secondary Containmerd and Control Room Pressure Boundaries, was developed to proverd compenmising these pressure boundaries through penetrations seats. This procedure was replaced by PT 31470.

S&L reviewed PT 31470. The Secondary Containment

' Boundaries are outside the scope of this procedure.

Procedure US WC 14 On-line Scheduling, was to be revised to include a review of affected Technical Specifications with special l attention peld to surveillance acceptance criteda. Prior to l revision of WC 14 the commitment was revised. The revision I deleted the requirement to review the surveillance of the l l acceptance criteria in a procedure. This requiremord was judged l by NU to not be practical nor would it have prevented the event. l l

S&L has reviewed US WC 14. The proc 4 dure with Attachmeids  !

include provisions for scheduling considerations and lists systems risquiring a PRA review. These do not include references to Suppismental Leak Collection and Release System or Secondary Boundaries. The procedure does not reference any commitments in Section 3 of the procedure.

The procedures do ext address the commitments made and are l considered to be a discrepency.

! Rev6.w Vand inveed Noented Date l

luitieter: N ' r. R. O O :2/is/97 VT Lead: Base, Ken Q 12/18/97 VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K @ Q 12/2397 Printed im9e 11:21:54 AM Page 1 or 2

Northout UtWties ICAVP M No. MW3MT Mastom ut* 3 Discrepancy Report 5tC Catrin: M Anand K g Q 12/31/97 Date:

pWALID:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

. ... zr, idonemed by NU7 O Yes @ No

^ '

Non Descrepent Conethw?(,) Yes @ No j

-% eenanetO va @ No ~~ -7 0 Y= @ No nuiew F -~ , Not Acceptable Needes Date VT Lead: Bees, Ken VT Mor: Schopfer, Don K O O IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K g

Dele:

SL Comments:

I i

l

)

! l l

l i

I l

r l

l I

I l

l Printed 1/7/9611:21:59 AM Pege 2 of I~

ICAVP DR No. DR 4AP3438 L Nwtheast unusee  ;

l uniscono unit 3 ' Discrepancy Report n==.or.e,: one s an = =

n h.mesese: symmie Design ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

a cheepase: mesmessiDesign - (-.) ,

oleerapeney w m g g,  ;

ayemmensese: pox  ;

Iste elessaeenselevet:4 Date FMad to edu: l OstePuhashed. 1/ tost

~

. .. Schematic diagrams and logic diagrams do not match. i ceneripaen: a) Schematic dimoram 26212 30241 sht. 4 (12179 2447.300- ,

004) indicates that the servioos shown are applicable to both SEG8*EG A & 8. The same services are shown on schematic diagram 26212 39241 sht.160 (12179-2447.300160).

Schematic dia0 ram 26212 30241 sht.100 indicates that the ,

servloes shown are applicable to only SEG8*EG 8. Hence, there appears to exist two separate drawings foc the same '8*

services b) Schematic diagram ESK tKJ indicates contact A8-88 (maintenance conted) from handowitch 43 EG8'EG-A is in parallel with the series combination of contacts from devioos TSR (Test start Relay), XK-00 (eequencer contact for LOP / SIS /CDA), and contacts 26 & 27 (remote contact) from handtwitch 43FT-EG8'EG-A. The corresponding logic diagram L8K-24 0.3J does not nocount for the remote contacts (26 & 27) from handowitch 43FT-EG8'EG A. .

l c) Logic diagram L8K-24-0.3J indicates the inputs from Pushbutions P81, P82, PBS, P84, along with lockout roiays i L 80HBU & 86H8P provides a signal to the Shutdown Relay, t,oth ,

E '

directly and through the 140 eeoond timer, via "OR* lo0ic. The schematic diagram ESK 8KJ irha the si0nal from the pushbuttons and lockout rolsys, to the shutdown toisy, is throu0h the 140 escond timer only. See similar circuit on L8K 24-0.3P i l

d) Logic diagram L8K 24-9.2A for the Emergency Diesel Generator breakers ($EN8*ACS G-A & 8) indicates two bus 1 undervolta0e inputs in the breaker closing circuit. The logic diagam indicates the two bus undervona0e 'enputs are made

.from a *2 out of 4* logic scheme using four NGV t..hotaps relays (27A, 8, C, & D) and the bus undervolta0e relay 27R- l 3ENSA14, the two inputs come froni a variation of those five  :

roisys. The s.a::;:C,s schemet!c diagram ESK SDR indicates a sin 0ie bus undervoltage relay (27R 3tASA18) {

contact is used as a permisolve in the tweaker closing circuit.

The schematic dosa not indicate a *2 out of 4* undervolta0e logic 4

^ -- scheme is associated with the DG breakers ~ Similar for schematic ESK-SDS (SEN8*ACS G 8). i

a) Logic diagram L8K 24-0.3L Indicates that a 'not* Manual Start Stock ,,w'::';; is required for the DG panel feed breaker  ;

close circuit and that a LOP / sis /CDA permissive is required for -

the brooker trip.- The lo0ic dia0 rem does not indicate any f thermal overtood/ loss of control power i,w'- _ e;. The l schematic diaprom ESK.8ABP does not indecate a Manual Start T::t p b--".

, ,, y 7M W 2 7

u. _

DR No. DR44P3 4834 Not Umues ICAVP Minatone unit 3 Discrepancy Report schematic indicates the permisolve required for both a close and trip of the tweaker 8s a t.OP/ SIS / COA si0nal and thermal overtood.

noview Veed invelhi Needed Date beseter: lAerton, R. g Q Q 12/1 M 7 VTLead: Nort, Arthoar^ O O tatiwr 12r2 w 7 VT tigra tahepfer, Den K O O OtC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Q 12/3147 Dete:

INVALID:

Date:

ME60 Lim 0N.

Previously ident0And by NU? O Yee @ No NonDiscrepentCondluon?O Yee @ No PM% Pending?O yee @ No n e unr.coevedt O vos @ No Review W'8'a= Not ^~at'h*'aa Needed Date m,

VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O G VT tigr: Schopfer, Don K 1RC Chmn: Birgh, AnerW K Date:

O b SL Conenente:

I l

[

l 1

Prtted 1175161:19~41 PM Page 2 of 2 l

Northeast utsties ICAVP DR No. DRW3443 M mesorm ur* 3 Discrepancy Report nwesw aroup: speem DRWAuD

" "' " 'P*

• Potennelopertammy leave Discipene: Skuohnf Desi'"

F . ny Type: Ch%

O v.

(,g g s, ^  : _ z: HVX NRC SignlAcanos level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Published: 1/1D96 1 .- + Dud Support Ca6culation Discrepancy Descrip#aa: We have reviewed the following non-standard duct support calculations:

DDD(1) CALC.# 12179-NP(F) Z60R 530-H005,REV.3 DDO(2) CALC.# 12179-NP(F)-Z545J-1306,REV.3 000(3) CALC. # 12179-NP(F)-Z545J-1245,REV.6 000(4) CALC. # 12179-NP(F)-Z545J 1235,REV.2 OOO(5) CALC. # 12179-NP(B) Z545J-1304,REV.2 Based upon this review,we have noted the following discrepancy:

Calculations for Flere Bevel Weld Check have not been perfonned.For specific examples check calculations and page numbers listed below; (1) CALC. # 12179 NP(F) Z60R 530-H005, PAGE l #19 l

(2) CALC. # 12179-NP(F) Z545J 1306, PAGE #18 (3) CALC. # 12179-NP(F) Z545J 1245, PAGE #22 (4) CALC. # 12179-NP(F) Z545J 1235. PAGE

1. 14,23 & 24 l

(5) CALC.# 92179-NP(B)-2545J-1304,PAGE #15 Review l VA wand Needed Date infilator: Kleic, N 3 O O 12/tas7 VT Leed: Nerl, Anthony A Q Q Q 12/1947 VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K G O O 12/22 7 l

IRC Chmn: Singh. Anand K Q Q Q 12/31/97 Date:

INVAUD:

Date:

RESOLUTION:

Proveously identelled by NLl? Q Yee @ No Non Diecrepent Condenon?Q Yee @ No neeendienpenenetO vea @ No m une=

• edt O Y= @ No moview N-- , * ' '

- Not ? : , Needed Date VT Lead: Nerl, Arthony A O O O vimen schepen DonK O O O IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:

sL Cesnmente Par. led 1/7/9811:22:46 AM Page 1 or 1

DR No. DRW34848 Northeast untie. BCAVP_.

inestorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report novie-er  : s,see,n onvna Revtow Blument: Systern Doelpi P: Strustwel Doelpri Dioerepancy Type: %%

Om gg systemsweses: HVX letC SignlAcenos level: 4 Date famed to tou:

Done Putnehed: 1/1W96 Deserepancy: Duct Support Calculatiun D6screpency Descripeten: We have reviewed the followin0 dud suppo't calculetions:

(1) CALC. # 12179-NP(T) Z507A-017, REV.3 (2) CALC. # 12179 NP(F)-Z545J 1036, REV. 3 (3) CALC. # 12179-NP(F)-Z5450 479, REV. 4 (4) - CALC. # 12179-NP(F) Z545J 1252 REV.2 (5) CALC # 12179 NP(F) Z507A-018, REV. 2 (6) CALC, # 12179 NP(F) Z545J 1220, REV. 0 (7) CALC, # 12179-NP(F) Z545J 1304, REV 2 (8) CALC, # 12179-NP(F)-Z545J 1306, REV 3 (9) CALC. # 12179 NP(T) Z5458 245, REV. O Based on this review we have noted the following drafting &

mathematicel errors:

(1) CALC, # 12179-NP(T)-Z507A-017 REV.3 PAGE # 6, GLOBAL AXES ARE INCORRECT.

PAGE # 11, /XIAL COMP, & DENDING INTERACTION SHOULD BE 0.54 ( NOT 0.88 )

i PAGE # 13, WELD CHECK JT. # IS NOT MENTIONED. l (2) CALC, # 12179-NP(F)-Z545J-1036. REV. 3 PAGE # 8, FZ LOAD SHOULD BE 896 lbs (NOT 866 Itm).

l (3) CALC.# 1217SNP(F)-Z545D-479, REV 4 l PAGE # 33 BASE PLATE BOLT LOCATION SHOULD BE 12.25,21.125 (NOT 13.281,12.125) l (4) CALC # 12179-NP(F)-Z545J-1252 REV.2 PAGE # 13, FOR WELD CHECK "J/CO' SHOULD BE 13.73 (NOT 7.62).

(5) CALC.# 12179-NP(F)-Z507A-018. REV.2 PAGE # 5, LOCATION PLAN NORTH DIRECTION IS NOT SHOWN.

PAGE # 6, GLOBAL AXE 3 ARE INCORRECT FOR SECTION 1-1.

ALSO.SECTION 2-2 IS INCORRECT, I (6) CALC, # 12179-NP(F) Z545J-1220 REV. O PAGE # 3, E & DCR # NOT REFERENCED.  !

PAGE # 10, REFERENCE IS NOT GIVEN FOR LOADS.

Prtnied 1/7/9811:23:12 AM Paes 1 of 2 1

l l

1

Northeast utsties BCAVP DR No. DR4P365 Miwone unit 3 Discrepancy Report (7) CALC, # 14179-NP(F)-Z545J-1304, REV. 2 PAGE # 5. LOCATION PLAN NORTH DIRECTK)N & SECTION 1 1 TITLE IS NOT SHOWN.

PAGE # 6, SECTICN 3-3 TITLE IS NOT SHOWN.

(8) CALC. # 12176 NP(F) Z545J 1306, REV. 3 PAGE # it, J/C1 SHOULD BE J/C3, (9) CALC. # 12179-NP(T) Z5458 245, REV. O PAGE # 6, SHEAR STRESS FORMULA AS SHOWN IS INCORRECT.

n.*w vene imens me. des Da initietor: Kiele, N O O O 2/in7 n L e: Nat A,e.ar A B D D * **7 VT Mgr Schopfer, Den K O O O $2/2mr iRC Clenn: Singh, Armt K O O O $2atio7 Dete:

mAuD:

Oste:

RESOLUTION:

M.'~"; identieed by NU? U vos (@ No NonDesce.pentConesion70 ves (@ No

-renenerO v. @ N. me.*m.a une.e*.stO va @ No n.*w m;p We NW Wh Needed Date VT Lead: Nort, Atmony A VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K

stC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:

O b O SL Commente:

l l

l l

l l

Prt16ed 1/7/9611:23:16 AM Page 2 of 2

i ICAVP DR W. DR4P3M8 Northeast UWities Millstorw Ur* 3 Discrepancy Report neview aroup: svanem onvaun

""' " W D*8" ponenenes operamanyleeue Discipene: Elstertoel Desi'"

Om Diecrepency Type: NW gg s,_ . . N/A NRC signiseense level: 3 Date faxed to NU:

Date Published: 1/104s

. ,. Documentation to verify ' associated circuits'statemet A in FPER could not be located Desertpelen:

Section 6.3.1.3.1, Page 610 of the FPER states:

" Associated circuits The final concem raised by power cable faults relates to the potential for an electrical fault, which is not property cleared, to damage adjacent or nearby circuits which are required in the safe chutdown sMustion (common enclosure).

As part of the Appendix R review the ICAVP review team attempted to verify this statement. The types of power circuits analyzed fall 6nto the following categories:

1, 4 kV power circuks 2, 480V switchgear power circuits

3. 480V MCC power circuMs 4.125V DC swNchgear control circuts 5, 120V AC control circuks (MCC control power transformer fed) 6,120V AC miscellaneous power / control circuMs 7.125V DC miscellaneous power / control circuits in the reviewwe determined:

1, 4 kV power circuits have the necessary documentation to determins relay settings, but a potential question exits with respect to transient temperature during faut conditions See discrepancy DR-MP3-0787.

2. 480V swNchgear power circuits have the necessary documentation to determine relay settings.

3. For power cable fed from MCCs, discrepancy M3-DR-00765 was issued because we could not locate docurtantation of the actual setting of the equipment and we could not confirm that the proper breakers and overioads settings were, in fact, installed.

4,125V DC switchgear control circuits are all fused at the switchgear. We could not identify a calculation which verified that the cortrol circuit fuses would adequately protect the control circuit cable from damage.

5. 120V AC control circuits (MCC control power transformer fed) are all fused and the control transformer sizes are small enough that cable damage is not a credible luue.

Pnniedimes11:2341 AF PeGe i ef 2

0 Northeast utilities ICAVP on m. om>sms Misistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report 6.120V AC miscellaneous power / control circuits fed frem distribution panels may be fused or protected with circuit tweakers, We could not identify a enhda83rwi which Verified that the cable protected by the fuse / breaker was adequately ' ,

protected.

7.125V DC miscellaneous power / control circuits fed from distribution panels may be fused or protected with circuit breakers We could not identify a calculation which verified that the cable protected by the fuse / breaker was adequately protected.

Conclusion:

We could not locate calculations or data required to verify the FPER statement, neview Vand kwehd Needed Date insnesor: wwner l. "

O ':/1"7 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A 12/1M7 VT Mgr: Schapter, Den K -

O O 12r2se7 inC Chmn: Singh, Anand K m Q Q 12/31197 Date:

IIWALID:

Date:

RESOLLTTION:  ;

7../- _P;identeRed by NU7 Q Yes @ No Nsa Dieerepent Caetion?O Yes @ No neaekalenPenenetO vos @ No nosemmanuarese,470 von @ No Review Asespeshie NW W h Needed Date mg VT Leed: Nort, Ardhony A , }

VT Mer: Schopfer, Don K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K

[

Date:

SL Canonente:

~

Printed 1/7/ge 11:23 de AM Page 2or 2 I

t

l Northeast UWWes ICAVP DR No. CW3MT notorm ur* 3 Discrepancy Repo#t neview org: syneem DnvAuD moveew w. system Dese , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Daseipaw: Ia c Desien g y,

-, Type: ""*

O No e,  : n Hvx Nnc signiaeanse level: 3 Date faxed to NO:

Date Puldehed. 1/10,6 F . ni; The sotpoint Value specified by calculation SP 3HVR 22 exceeds the Technical Specificat6on limit.

D.ecripenn: Calculation SP-3HVR 22 documents the setpoint for temperature switches 3HVR TIS 109A, B, and C whidi tripper an alarm on hi0h temperature in the charging pump cubicles. The Technical Specification requires that the temperature in this area shall not exceed 110*F, however, the calculation specifies the setpoint for each switch to be 119'F.

neview Valid invebd Needed Dele inflictor: Reed,Wulam = 12/1H7 VT Leed: Nort, Arthony A O O O 12/1a7 VT Mgr: schopfer, Don K O O i2/2s,7 inc Chmn: S:ngh, Anand K Q Q Q 12/31/97 Date:

DNAuD:

Date:

mE80LUTioN:

Prowletiety idenIIAed by Nu? O Yes @ No Non piecrepent Condition?O Yes @ No n eiumeneenene?O vos @ No neech m en uare *

• edr O vos @ No noview Acceptable Not ? - , Needed Date VT Leed: Nerl, Anthony A VT Men schopfer, Den K InC Chmra singh, Anand K Dele:

O -

SL Conenente:

l

)

l

~

Prtreed 1/MI611:2409 AM Page 1 of 1 I 1

i i

Nwtheast UWWes BCAVP DR No- DRM4848 Milletene unit 3 Discrepancy Repoft nwiew aroup: symem DRvAuD nwesw essenant: system Design Deeelpene: Electrieel Design Descrepancy Type: Dnmirg O v. I

@ No s,1r  : Hvx NRC signimeenee twel: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Puheehed, inoss Diesrepancy: Schematic diagram does not match the Electrical Timor Setpoint Database.

D=cetption: Timing relay uptpoints and ranges are typically provided in the schematics al.d on the Elodrical Timer Setpoint Database.

Inconsistencies between these two documords are identified as follows-a) Schematic diagram ESK4SD Rev. 8 identifies the setpoint for A0astat relay 62 3HVRTN14A as 10 seconds. The Electrical Timer Setpoint Database (SP EE-321 Rev 0) indi::stes that the setpoird is 20 seconds. Similar for relay 62 3HVRTN148 on ESK4SE Rev.10.

b) The raodel numtwr, as provided on the schematic diagrams, for A0astat relays 62A 3HVRTN6A (ESK4SB Rev.10) and 62-SHVR*ACUI A (ESK4SM Rev.11) do not match SP-EE 321 Rev. O.

c) The A0astat relay type, (TDDO versus TDPU) are not consistent for relays 62A 3HVRTN6B (ESK4SC Rev.12) and 62-3HVR*ACU1B (ESK4SM Rev,11).

l neview Vehd invand Needed Date l

inittster: Morten, R. O O 12ria/e7 G

VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O O '2/1SS7 VT Mgri schopfer. Den K Q O $2r23s7 WIC Clunn: Singh, Anand K G O O $2rsiro7 Dele:

DNALID:

Date:

nEsoLUTloN

.t. . -?, hientined 14 NU7 U Yes @ Ne NonDiecropontCondition?U vos @ No p"h PendinstO vos @ Ne - % unremesvedt O va @w Review

, hYh Not A~Yh Needed Date VT Land: Nort, ArWumy A vT ugn sehe,se . Den K g _

O WIC C4uun: s%Anand K g Date:

SL Canunente:

PHnted 1/r4811:2441 AM Page 1 of 1

d Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DN34449

- M"letone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report newetw emy: system DaVauD Re*w seement: syntan Desip -

pleedpene: Mechanical Desip Om Desempeney Type: Dmeg g g, s, f - - :HVX NRC signincense level: 4 Date FW to D8u-Date Puhtshed.1/1096

. :r. Auxiliary Buildin0 Duct Support Mark Number Drawing Deecetpoen: During review of the auxiliary building ventilation system and the supplementary leak collection and release system ductwork drawings the following discrepancy was identified.

Note 5 on drawing EB-45G 9 states "for dud support mark numbers for el 66'4" see EB-450,R". Review of GRITS indicates that the drawin0s reformd to la the note are void.

noview Valid invoud Needed Date inluetw: Stoid, M. D. Q g Q 12/1M7 VT Leed: Nort, Anihony A =

0 12/1 " I VT Mgr: schopfer, Don K O 12/23/97 unc Chmn: singh, Anand K -

0 O iar31rer Date:

mAuD:

Date:

REaOLUTioN.

Previewly identIAnd by NU7 Q Yes % No Non Deserepent Condition?Q Yes (9) No l neemmenPenenstO Yes @ No Reemmenunroemed70 ves @ No

,w

^~-r a h led Wh Needed Date mg VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A VT Mer: schopfer DonK O O S BRC Chan: skgh, Anand K [

l Date:

sL Commente:

i, l

I Printed 1/7/961125:00 AM Page 1 of 1 l

l

ICAVP DR No. DRW3468 Northeast UO3 ties Minietone unit 3 Discrepancy Report no e ,: s, mivAuD me*w moment: operenne Pmahn ,,,,,,,,

"'"*""" *" O v.

Descapeney Type: L60ensing Daumont gg syseenwevosene: Hvx NRC SiydAmenee levet: 3 pese faxed to NU:

Dene Puhashed: 1/1046

h. -i. Potential inooneistency between 16consino documents and EOP Dee mip

• n: In the event of a fire in the control room, instrument rock room or cable spreading room, power must be removed from Dampers 3HPPMOD23A,20A,20C and 26A to cause the dampers to fall open to ensure ventilation to the orange emergency diesel generator enclosure. Procedure EOP 3503 doenergizes Circuit 6 in Panel SSCPPNL250 located in the d6 cool generator snelosure. However, NERM 64, Rev. 2 calls for removing power to these dampers by opening the supply breaker at Panel SCPPNLR10 and FPER Section 7.2 states that power to the dampers is removed by esmovin0 the control fuses in the 6mergency switchgear room.

Review Vend invelld Needed Dele 12/1997 Inalesor: Leuni, C. M. Q i

VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A y ~

] 12/2097 VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K y ] 12/2347 ptC Chmn: Singh, Anand K O O O 12/31'87 Date:

DNAUD:

Date:

nasoLUTloN.

7... ";leoneland by NU7 O Yes (@ No NonD6emepentCenenten?Q Yes (@ No n=*mnren*stO va @= -unr=*edtO v= @m

! ne*w Aces.ne* mi e medad D*

VT taed: Nort, Armany A O O O VT Mer: senspeer, Den K O g IRC Chan: Singh, Anand K O O j Date:

SL Conwnente:

i PrNed im9611 :Mt14 AM Page1 or 1

Northeast UtWties BCAVP DR No. DNW42 Museorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report moview aroup: symmm DnVAuo newtow element: system Design Discopens: Elesmael Desi'"

O Yes Oleerepency Type: Celadation g s, Jr - HVX NnC Signessanne level: 4 Date FAXad to Nu:

Date Puhilshed: 1/1046 r . ii. Demper load left out of the S80 diesel generator loader.g ca',culation DesertF #en: Calculation No. PA 90-050-0306E3, Rev. 2, ' Station Blackout Diesel Generator Loading" calculates the steady state required and contin 0ency loading for the SBO diesel Generator. The esiculation did not include Damper 3HVRWOD50A as a regulied load. This is the ventilation supply damrw to the charging pump A cubicle. Durit'g the winter, the damper upstream of damper WOD50A is closed and rnmains closed during pmp operation and therefore, damper NOD 50A is not required to operate.

However, durin0 the summer months the upstream valve is opened and damper WOD50A must be open to supply ventilation to the cubicle during pump operation. This is a cmall load and snould not change the conclusion of t'.., calculation, noview Vend invand Needed Oste -

Inittster: Lmni. C. M. O O Q 12/1sS7 12/2097 VT Land: Nort, Arthony A -

Q

$2/23s7 VT Mgr: schaptw, Den K G O WIC Chmn: singh, Anand K G O 12t31/97 Date:

INVALID:

Date:

nEsOLuTloN.

N/";identised by Nu? U Yes @ No NonDiscrepentCondellen?O Yes @ No I

no.munenponenerO Y= @ M. neestumenun, drO v.s @ N.

ne*w  !

^~th Not Acceptahis Needed Oste

%g VT Lead: Neri, Anthony A O G VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K WIC Clennt singh. Anand K g g Date: l sL Countente:

Prtitud 1/7/981126:01 AM Page 1 of 1

Northeast utmeine ICAVP DR No. MW3M reistetone unit a Discrepancy Report nwesw eroep: sysen onvAun

""""8*""D'" potenew opereMmey leeue Deseipane: EteeMoel Desi'"

OleerspencyType LicensingDM O v.

@ No s, L 7  : DQX NRC signiaeanee level: 3 Date faxed to NU:

Dats puWhehad: 1/10/96 Oteersper:F: FSAR Tate 8.3 3 appears to be incomplete.

Desertreten:

FSAR Sedion 8.3.1.1.4, Page 8.3 25 states:

Loads with a non-safety function which are conneded to safety related buses are protoded for short circuit and overload conditions. Theso loads are fred in Table 8.3 3.

Lighting Pnl ESF Bido SLAK PNLSESF2P is conneded to 3EHSWCC184. '

l Heat Tracing Panel 3 HTS-PHLA3 is conneded to 3EHSMCC184.

Lighting Panel DSL Gen Bido 3 LAD-PNL3DG01 is conneded to 3EHSWCCIA1. 1 These loads do not appear to be listed in Table 8.3-3.

Tne loads were determined by a review of the fol60 wing drawings:

EE 1AJ rev. 28 480V MCC One Line Diag ESF Building Sh.

2 EE-1 AK rev. 27 480V MCC One Llae Diag Del Enci & Aux BirA neview Valid invalid Needed Date inteleter: Womer,1. Q Q 12/21/97 12/2o97 VT Land: Nort, Anthony A Q m VT Mgr: Schepier, Den K O O O 12/2 ale 7 IIIC Clenn: singh, Anand K -

Q 12/31/97 Date:

IINALD:

Date:

l-ME80LUTioN.

.7. 1- i WenNasd by nut U vm @ No NonDescrepentConehen?U vm @ No

-eenengtO va @ No asemmenu=emedtO vos @ No noview AccepteWe Not AccepteMe Needed Date mg VT Laod: Non. Antheiy A O G VT Mgr: Schopeer, Don K stC cannn: singh, Anand K Prtneed 117/9611:26N[M - Page 1 or 2 1

l l.

.6-du -e ....e u 4ma w. __. Osm~*4-,_.S. + M a ...mpav _a.. 4 a_A,. ..ama-.A_.4. a-m.a -.niAsh.w. mas-. m 0

ICAVP DR No. OR MPMSN

' Nd th i

Museeone unn a Discrepancy Report c

-= _

PmMin/g6112M1 AM Peoe 2 of 2

K:AVP DR No. DRW8444 Netheast UWWes man unit 3 Discrepancy Report l newtow e,en,: Puyonmeme onVaus L t

novtow h canesem Aenen Presses Dessipaw: oposene O vee Diesreyeney Type: conostw Aenen implementemen gg s, _ .-  : swr  :

1800 tipeteense twet: 4 Date faxed to NU: f Date Puhnehed: 1/1040 ,

Dieseepeney: Incemp6 ele Closure of Unroers ed Nem Report (UIR 1414) ,

DesertP J ea: In oor$ unction with UlR 1414, the Disoropency Hein closure P6ckage (DICP) has been reviewert only the nest two Recoremended ts-::"J:e.s are addressed in the DICP The recomenpndation for Design Engineerin0 to Generate MMDD to correct Ops Fer;rrim designations, as applicable has not boon addroceed.

Note: It is rooognized that changes to OFS Form / Procedure deei0nstions may not be needed to address the specific Leeue  :

documented on this UlR, however, if no changes are needed, this should be documented with juellfication in the DiCP sirce it is clocrty Irdicated as a recommended dispoaltion on the UIR which has boon reviewed / approved by the EP/PVRT and UPM.

As an example, another recommended disposition was for '

Desien Eneinserin0 to generate a DCN to correct P&lD, as appiscable. The DiCP documentation clearty ind6 cates that the P&lD was reviewed and determined to be correct, so the lesue is i property closed with re0 erd to potential impact to P&lDs (eg. no imped) and the recommended disposition shown on the UIR was ,

property addressed. l nwes.

Vand Waild pleaded Date w on n- ima O O O im7 vr w nm mea = J G O O im7  ;

vm ne see.,in.Denx 0 0 = im7 WIC otonn: airgh, Anand K Q Q Q 12/31/97 Date:

eWAUD:

s Date:

RBaoumoul:

N f- #ileanutet by lef? U Yes @ No leen Deserepentoene h ? O vos @ No mesetuttenpenenstO va @ me meestutianunroestadtO va @ we mntow inMeten (nese)

VT Leed: Ryan, Themes J O O O vt tien sens,In. Den n g O e 50C otonn: Sergh, Anand K Date:

O b b d

St.Canonents:

Pitnted 1/1/981127;30 AM Pese 1 er 1

~ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

e DR No. DR.84P84902 e

mmm KMVP henneeww unit 3 Discrepancy Report i newtow om,: ceneywesen onvaun movtewelemane aynessossion ,,,,, , ,,,,

Diestra m: Ele *w one" O yee  :

oneseepeney Type: omme gy g, spesenspresses: oax ,

NRC Signiseense level: 4 Date PAMed to NW.

Date Puhtlehed.1/100s

- -e Condisit bupport Lo(as and TSO2 not in aprooment.

Dueripalm: The fol60w6n0 dieorepancles were c.scovered during the review of Conduk Support Logs (CSL) and the Cable & Raoeway  ;

^

Control Program (TsO2) for the Diesel Generator (DGX)

System. All droudn0s have boon vertfled es currerd, valid desl0n drew 6ngs with no open change dooutwits per the Generation Records information Treolung System (GillTS):

1. CSL 12179-FSK DG 154 Revie60n 2A lists conduit 3CC864PC as an associated condut. Within the Racewey Support Summary function of T802, conduM 3CC864PC is listed as ansching to support DG 154 when inputting the support number.

However, in the Racewey Schedule futution of TSO2 conduN 3CC864PC does not ex6st.

2. C8L 12179-FSK DG 307 Revision 1 lists condun SCX862NA as an assoolated condut, however T802 does not 6tuhcate that condut 3CX862NA atteohes to support DG-307.

3. TSO2 indicates that conduit 3CX863NA attaches to support DG 307, but CSL 12179 FSK DG 307 does not list conduH 3CX863NA as an assoolated conduM.

4. CSL 12179-FSK CB 1027 Revision 50 lit,ts conduN 3CX960PK1 as m associated conduit, however, TSO2 does not indicate that oormut 3CX950PK1 attaches to support Cb 1027.

5. CSL 12179 FSK-CS 1049 Revision 4A lists conduMs 3CK406PC and 3CC452PM as assoolated conduits, however, TSO2 does not ind60ste tha' these conduMs attas in support CB-1049. TSO2 eleo indicates that conduit 3CK406k, does not exist.

8. CSL 12179 FSK C51071 Rev6elon 5 lists conduMs 3CX950PC9 and 3CXt60PT2 as assoc 6atad conduks, however, TSO2 does not indicate that these conduns attach to support CB-1071.

7. CSL 12179-FSK-CS 1001 Revision 5C lists conduits SCX503NA2 and 3CX503NA3 as associated conduits, however, T802 does not indicate that those conduts attach to support CB-1001,

8. CSL 12179-F8K C51114 Revision 10A 16sts conduits SCX960PD,3CC495PJ, and 3CX950PG as associated condGts, however, T802 does not Indicate that these conduits attacti to support C81114.

emme $mse sinesM Pese i er 3

g gp DR No. DR 44P3 0902 neilleeww unit a Discrepancy Report  !

9. CE 12179f 8K CS 1260 Revlolon 4A lists conduits 3CH4070E flex and 3CC4070G as ed conduits, t

however T902 does not indicate that those conduits atted to '

support CS 1260.

10. CE 12179-Fi GC81301 Revleion 25 lists condd 3CK960NP as an assoaisted conduit, however, TSO2 does not indloats that this conduit attades to support C51301. l ii. CE 12179f 8K CS 1534 Revision 6A lists conduit 3CX303NA as an ed condd, however, T802 does not ind6cate that this conduit attaches to support C51539. TSO2 -

also ind60stes that conduit 3CX303NA does not exlet.

12. CE 12179-FSK CS 1752 Revis% 3 lists conduit 3CK406PC as an assooisted onnduit, however, T802 does not Indicate that this conduit attaches to support CB 1752. TSO2 ,

also indicates that condull 3CK406PC does not exist.

13. CE 12176 FSK C31764 Nevleion 3 lists condd 3CK400PC as an asociated condd, however, TSO2 does not ind6cate that this :enduit attachen to support CB 1754. TSO2 also indicates that condd 3CK400PC does not exist.

14. CE 121 TM8K CS 1790 Reviolon 2 lists condd 3CK406PC as an wM conduit, t-n :*, T802 does not indicate that this conduit attachm to support C51760. TSO2 also indicates that conduit 3CK406PC does not exlet.

15. CE i2179fSK CB 1762 Revision 2 lists condd 3CK4004 as an associated conduit, however, TSO2 does not ind6cate that this conduit attaches to support C81762. TSO2 also indicales that conduit 3CK400PC does not exlet.

it. C8L 12179f8K CB 1766 Revision 2 lists condd 3CK4C8PC as an associated conduit, however, TSO2 does not indioste that this conduit attaches to support C51765. T802 ateo Irid 60stes that conduit 3CK400PC does not exist.

17. C,84 25212 34C11 Sh. CS 1799 Revleion 5 does not lists any of tee qual 6Hostion documents for the support.

18. CE 12176f 8K CS 2300 Revlolon 7 lists a tominal bon (SCOP TS 71) as manathed with the support, however, T402 does not ind6cate these items as attaching to support CB-2,60 0.

19. CE 1217MSK CS 5434 Revision 4 lists conduit 3CX423NB as an assoolated conduit, however, TSO2 does not ind6cate that this conduit attaches to support CS 5438. TSO2 ind6 cates that conduit 3CX426N8 attaches to support CB 5438.

newesw Vehd hweed geseded Date I

bdWars sener.T.L Q Q Q 12/2247

=

VT Imed: Ned, Archeny A Q 12/2357 VT Mart " Dan K

. 12/2se7 Pmbed 1/Fles 11'2 hse AM Page 2or 3

_ ,._._, _ _ _ ,_,,a.,.-__ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

w usee K:AVP M

• M**8 es m et a w u nit 3 Discrepancy Report VT Myr Sehspier, Den K Q Q t2/2347 i WIC 08 sun: Segh, Anand K a O O 12/31197 asse:

swAue:

l Date:

natoumoes:

.t/:r"- hennemed by NWf V Vee f@ No Non Disorepent Cemeten?Q Yes (@ No nee *mear.neaetO va @ we neemmea u.eee*edtO va @ we nev6.w

%g P Not W a Needed Date l

VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O O VT Mgr Sahepier DenK O O O lac Clenn: Segh, M K O b b l 1

Oste:

SL Comnante: )

i i

)

l l

l Pnnled 1,7/961120 01 AM page 3 og 3

l l ,

• Noveieset m MVP DR No. DRW84008 ,

l testatene Unit 3 Discrepancy Report j note.= o es., envan j Ants.he systoninetetshun  !

sheetene:14 C Doelpi ebsersponey Type: kuletusen insiemunettwi Om j @ No i systenspreseov om -

teto signiseense twel: 4 mete Palled to Nu: f este Puenehed: t/ttes  !

\

. - - - .. Instrument instanadon not in seconlance weh design documents  !

and standenis l esserlynen: During system wohiJowns the following installadon discrepencies  !

wwe obewved. Twees r:: :;:-m have the potential of l

offeding the accureoy and performance of the sesoolated equipmetd. [

1. Electrical installation spoolfloation E360 Rev 8, para 0raph j t 3.3.11,1 states ' install a ground wire in perellel with the flexible  ;

conduit using approved bushing at each end. The ground wires shall not be twieled or spirated around the flexible conduit, and shall be long enough to allow three inches of movement of one end of the flexible conduit relative to the other end, in any direction.' Contrary to this requirement the following instruments i do not have the noosenery three inches of eleck in the ground wire: SEGF*LSS48,3EGF L8245,3EGD LT205, and SEGD-POIS288.  ;

' 2. The following documents state that the use of Teflon Tape for I

seeling of instrument connections is fortddden and that grafoil tape shall be used as the thread noelant: l&C Technical Bulletin

1. 102, Tutdne In"8all**k"1 spoolfloation SP-EE 212, and Pipin0 installation Spoolfloation SP-ME 570.

Contrary to this : ,1'M the following instruments have Teflon Tape appiled to their throeded connections:

MGSVG38AS, 3E08T03082, SEGSVG3083, SEGO-Pl278, 3EGF POIS22C, SEGF FT31 A and 3HVR PE108. >

Adellionally, high preneurs flex lines on Dicael En0ine Gauge Panels A & B are threaded with Teflon Tape installed at the connections. There are many instances throughout the (Wesel Generator where the Wee of Teflon Tape was discovered. Teflon Tape was atto discovered inside the containment on the i Containment Hsteh Controls prosaure indiostor,

3. Spoolflosuon SP EE 212 Revleion 1, Scotion 14

• Painting' i states 'All unpointed llems, stands, trackets, and supports for instruments en Wor their tubing systems, amoept galvanized, stainless steel, monel, Carpenter 20, and copper surfaces, shall be given surfeos properation and be painted in ecoordance with ,

the epocinostlen for APPLICATION OF PROTECTIVE COATING MATERIALS *, Contrary to this requirement all the ,

tutdne assoolated with the instruments on the Diesel Generator i

have been painted.

m "

_.m._____._ _ __. _ w__ _ _-

Pimled 1/hos 11'20.22 Abd Pope 1 or 2 1

rwwww-~.---em*n,-*e r - ,

l i l l I

e o Nwtheast UWWes ICAVP M

• M**'8 c

u meew w urm s Discrepancy Report i

This is twd a conAguration mana0ement leaue. l

! 1 The handle on the leolation volve for instrument SEGO-Pl27A 4

is troken. 1 Review Vand twebd Needed Date l

12/2297 l bdrister Senw, T. L g Q vttese: Nwt. A*=v A O O O 12/2wr viesen senspan,oenK g a 12/2m7 i utC Cnmn: tenen, Anand K g Q Q 12/3147 Date: l WWAUD: l Date:

rett 0LUTIotd: i r... "; manused by Nur U vm @ tes NontummepamcomumentU Yu @ No i

-penmaerO vm @m Rossameau-oomodtO vm @w neview AeoepteMe feet We Needed Date f mg vrt ed: Nwi, we O O -

vr men sens,Nr.eu. O O O vic Cania: men. Anand x

@ @ g te:

el Canonents:

I i

I l

Printed 1/1/9811:26.26 AM Page 2 of 2

Northeast UWWes ICAVP DR No. DRMM umetone unit 3 Discrepancy Report l nevtew aroup: conn women e onvAun nwtow stoned: 9jetem Deelen opwenduer leem omei,ano:i a c D=>

omweeaer'm: % o, ,,y,,

s,___ = Hvx NRo algniesense twel: 4 Date FAXedis NU:

Date puhelehed: 1/ toes >

-r .- -ri Dresdn0 ta0 ldenteficat6on errors neeww on: As pari of the drawing review in properation for system wel640wns, the fo66ow6ng drawing disoropencies were discovered. Vendor drowing 2474.030424193 Rev F contains a ,

instrument ta0 legend along with the pictorial representation of the physical assemtdy of panels 3RMS*RAK1 A and 3RMSPAK18. The legend for 3RMS*RAK1 A calls for vendor .

(Kaman Solences) designation of REC 144 to be NU tag number 3HVRPR10A while the pidorial representation of the panel ind6 cates that the vendor designation of REC 1&5 to be NU ta0 number 3HVRPR10A. The legend also ind6 cates that vendor designation of REC 2&5 corresponds to NU tag number 3HVRPR108 while the pictorial represerWation shows hat verxlor designation REC 244 corresponds to 3HVRPR108. ,

n 6.w vand invand Needed Date Inteleter: server.T.t O O Q 12/22/s7 12/2397 VT Laod: Nerl. Avery A O IRC Ceann singh K Q 12/3 l l

Dek:

! IW4bo: l I

Date:

nE90LUTioN: ,

M.' ";identIAed by NUF U Yes (G) No NonObserspentCandatentO Yes (9) No l neestmeneenmaet O Y= @ No neeenmenuwweerO va @w noiew Acomptable Notfi;W -

Needed Date VT Lead: Ivai. Mheny A O O I I VT Mgr: hohepeer. Den K 1 l Mh %MK h )

I el C ens u nto:

l l

~

Prtnand 1/74s 11:2s 90 AM p g .,4 or g l

l

l w gggggge, lCAyp DR No. DRMP&4904 7 4

meissem unit a Discrepency Report me w .C % Da vAi.m As*w stament: baten D.#i ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,  !

Dissipano: 14 C Dead'"

O v.

Dieseepeney Type: De*g gg systempreesee: Hvx NRC tientemense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Does Puhashed.1/1090

. -r. Desv4ne ta0 identifloation errors Desertymon: As port of the drawing review in properation for e/Wem weihdowns, the following drawing d6eorepancies were dieoovered, Vendor drowing 2474.030424-193 Rev F contains a instrument ta0 le0*nd along with the p6abriel represordation of the physical steemtdy of panels 3RMSHAK1 A and 3RM8HAK18. The legend for 3RM8HAK1 A calls for vendor (Kamen So6enoet) designat6on of REC 144 to be NU ta0 number 3HVRSR10A while the p6ctorial repsonordation of the panel indicates that the vendor desi0 nation of REC 1&5 to be NU tag number 3HVRHR10A. The legend also ind6celos that vendor doei0 nation of REC 2&5 corresponds tc NU ta0 number 3HVR'RR108 while the pictorial representation shows that vendor des 30 nation REC 264 oorresponds to 3HVRPR108.

nom.

vees n eas Noseed De Induster; taver,T.L Q g Q 12r22/e7 vt L.ed: Nwl, A**v ^ D D '2'3257

$2r2se7 Vr Idpr Seheper, Den K G O IRC Ctenn: Singh, Anand K O O $2ratie7 Does: ,

NWAUD:

Date:

Mee0LUTloN:

n.J'- ^;idonelsed by nut U Yes % les NonDieerepentCanellenfU Yes @ No neemmenconmetO Y= @ me nemenmaa u=ee m edt O v a @*

ne*.

P Ned Asemptable Needed Dele

%g VT Lead: Net, Anthony A O O O VT nee r schopfer DenK O b mC Cien.: m Anand v Date:

O b O elCommente:

Prtnted il7/oS 11:2e 00 AM Paes 1 of 1

_. .m . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ - - - _ . _ - ,

~

DR No. DR MP3 0757 Northeast UtWt6es ICAVP I Mmeterm Ur* 3 Discrepancy Report "r8m Rev6ew Group: Opershone & Mortenance and Teenne DRDNAUD Mov6ew teament: Opereeng Predse O Yes D6ecrePancy Type: Proedre implemordekon g~ g SysteWProcese: N/A NRC Segrencance levd 4 Date FAKod to NU:

Date Puteehed:

06ecew, MANAGEMENT'S EXPECTATIONS NOT CONVEYED DURING STATION STAND DOWN D* crir#en: This Discrepancy Report is a dupilacate of DR-0777 and is therefore CANCELLED.

Rev6,w vond invand Needed Date O ' 2')$'7 innister: Unowen, R. O O O 55*8 VTLeed: bene,k*a O O vria e n m . w K O O O iRC Chmn: 84nah, Anand K O O O Dese: 12/30/97 DNAuD: See Discrepancy Report.

Date:

RESOLUTION:

Previously beentened by NUF U Yes (G) No Non W ,-1Condaton?O Yes (Gi) No W%PendinetO Yes @ No P " % uareeenvedtO Vee @ No Review

.4-: ;' "- Net ht?"- Needed Dale VT Lead: Sees, kan O O O VT tagr: Schopfer, Don K O O O IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K g De6e:

SL Commente:

Page 1 of 1 Ptnnled im9610 36 53 AM

Netheast UetWes N:AVP DR No. DRWM3 me6mm unaa Discrepancy Report Review Group: System DR sNAUD ,

Revtewmissnesd SystemDoelp Diesipens: Pipkg Desip O yes Disorepency Type: Calculshen g Systenervosese: HVX NRC tieniteense twel: 4 Date Famed to NU:

Date Puhilshed: tM09s Deserepent r: P6pe strees analysis colouletkm has unvertfled assumptions.

Desertpeten: In the process of reviewing Calculation 12179-NP(8FX54002, Rev. O, we noted the fo460wln0 disoropency.

The coloulat60n assumes:

1. Drain lines leading from filters 3HVR

• FLTR .1 A,18, 2A, 28,3A & 38 operste at ambient temperature ( 70 F ).

2. ANSI Teos are used at all toe connedions in this problem.

SlF for ANSI Laterol Teos are per 1.0.M. from J. Goldberg, Dated 04 20 77 (04 20-600).

These assumptions are unverified and require confirmation.

Review vand invand moeded Date  ;

i.essner: sorgh, n. O -

0 1 ***

12Q097 VT Land: Nort. Arthony A Q VT Mgri Sohopter, Don K O sec chen: airgh. Anand K O O Date: 12/20/97 sNAue: Duplicate discrepency has been issued. This is same as DR-MP3-0069.

Octs:

REo0LUTeost:

.t/";idanuAnd by NUf Q vos @ No Non D6screpent Condulan?O vos @ No neemmenrenenerO v. @ me - unroemodrO va @ no Re*.

heisten (none)

• • • • '"" " "****d

• VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O O VT Mer: Schopest, Den K O O O IRC CW: Singh, Anand K Date:

SL Conenente:

i

~

l Preendimen tiaa AM p,,, i or i

x DR No. DR asp 84887 Nathoest utillaise K:AVP miseam unit a Discrepancy Report Review Group: Opemeens a Maintenense and TeeW OR DNALB l mestow seemese: Cenessee Aasen Presses

"*""* *" O va Desengeney Type: Cenessee Acton invismentehen gg systenWpvosese: 00X letC Sionleoense twel: 4 Date faxed to NU:

Date Pumashed: 1/10es theorepeney: Unatdo lo conArm that Special Reports are leeued for D6esel i Generator failures por TS 4.8.1.1.3 Domespelen: Reviewer was only able to conArm two instances (104/88 &

4/14/94) where the station leeued a Spoolal Report as required 4 by Technical Spoolf6 cation 4.8.1.1.3 for a diesel generator failure. RFl 770 requested additional exarnpies subsequent to  ;

4/14/94. The 4/14/94 report was provided. A review of diesel generator ACRs revoeied ACR 10428 was initiated due to a ,

diesel generator failure on 5/28/96. The Adverse Condit'on Report Lead investies60r Aeol0nment Shoot (RP4-6) required a i Spoolal Report be generated as did the Adverse Condition Report Causal Fadors and Corrective Action Plan, Form RP 4 7, .

Rev 2. Page 4.

A search of LIST did not revoel a copy of the special Report nor was a copy attached to the ACR. Sitx* RFl 770 requested additional Spooiel Reports and none were provided, the reviewer is unable to conArm compliance with the Technical Specification 4.8.1.1.3 requirement and therefore this is a discrepancy. ,

newtow Vand invaded Needed Date initioner: Tamiyn. Tem o O i2tsis7 VT Leed: Dees. Men g 1448 VT Mori schopfer. Den K Q Q Nec Coenn: 8Wgh. Anand K Q g Q

Does: 12/31/97 DNALID: Additional exemples Were identined that conArm that the Station is satisfying this requirement.

Dees:

itseoumoN:

N.' 2";idanuted by NU? O Yes @ No NonDeserepeatCondnion?Q Yes @ No nosolueler Pe =anet O vos @ No - unresoevedt O vos @ we noview P Net Aseeptatio Needed Date mg VT Lead: Sees, Ken u O O VT Mor: Schspear. Den K b

E IRC Ctenn: Segh. Anand K Date:

at Cenenents:

PrWed inse 11:29276 M Pese 1 or 1

_ _ _ _ _ . . _ . - __ ._ .- -