ML20079F220

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:50, 23 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That FEMA Has Confirmed Receipt of Revised Transition Plan & Revised NUREG-0654 cross-reference for Facility
ML20079F220
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 01/13/1984
From: Krimm R
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To: Jordan E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 NUDOCS 8401180189
Download: ML20079F220 (1)


Text

m jAp! x g4 Federal Emergency Management Agency

w <

O JAN I 31984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Edward L. Jordan Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement Commission U.S. Nuclear JN Regulatory

- /

FROM: R c ard W. Krimm ~~

Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards

SUBJECT:

Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Review of Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station This is to inform you that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Region II staff has confirmed the receipt by all RAC members of the revised transition plan for Shoreham. The plan (one set) consists of four volumes and incorporates revisions 0,1, 2, and 3. The FEMA Region II office received four sets of the revised plan on December 30, 1983. In addition, a revised NUREG-0654 cross-reference was provided along with a clarifying letter from LILCO. Although the revised cross-reference is helpful, the utility did not provide the matrix (that was requested in FEMA's December 22, 1983, memorandum) identifying page changes affected by each revision of the plan with reference to NUREG-0654.

Members of the FEMA Region II staff have made inquiries into this matter and expect clarification from LILCO's counsel shortly.

We will, of course, continue the review of the revised Shoreham plan. As we noted in our December 22, 1983, memorandum, we will make every effort to complete the review as close to February 1,1984, as possible, although some additional time may be needed to assure a comprehensive analysis of the plans by a full RAC review.

f D

e401180iB9[4hih2 7 ma m 5 gl