ML20207N541
| ML20207N541 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1986 |
| From: | Mcloughlin D Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207N544 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#187-2071, RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 OL-5, NUDOCS 8701140279 | |
| Download: ML20207N541 (72) | |
Text
,
6 k-i eE y
7 Federal Emergency Management Agency 1
Washington, D.C. 20472 UEU 3 01986 Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cbmmission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Stello:
On July 16, 1986, the Nuclear Pegulatory Canmission (NRC) requested the Federal Emrgency Management Agency (FDM) to review Revision 7 of the Iorg Island Lighting Conpany's (LIICO) Transition Plan for the Shorehan Nuclear Power Station (SNPS) and LIICO's responses to the FDR Region II Shoreham Post Exercise Assessment (PEA) for the February 13, 1986 exercise of Pevision 6 of the LIICO Transition Plan. On September 30, 1986, NRC requested FEMA to include Revision 8 in its review of the LIICO Plan. %e requests were made under the NRC/FDM MemoraMum of Understanding (MOU).
A full Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) review of Revisions 6, 7 and 8 has been empleted and the results are contained in the enclosed report entitled "LIICO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8, Consolidated RAC Review" dated Decenber 15, 1986. We LIICO responses to the FDM PEA are evaluated separately on the enclosed spread sheets.
(Note: On February 12, 1986, FD% provided NRC with the results of the FDR review of Revision 6; however, due to the limited nature of the changes, the review was conducted by FD1A lbgion II.
In reviewing Fevisions 7 and 8, FDM also requested the RAC to include Revision 6 in their review).
'Ihe RAC reviewed the plan revisions against the staMards and evaluative criteria of NURD3-0654/FDIA-REP-1, Fev.1.
Based on FDR's evaluation, Fevision 8 contains fifteen inadecuacies. Re planning inadequacies and reconnendations for improvement are explained in.the enclosed RAC review.
Due to the legal authority issues which arise when some NUREG elenents are applied to a utility-based plan, we have marked with an asterisk any aspect of the plan where, in our view, this legal issue occurs. he specitic legal concern related to that part of the plan is identified separately in of the consolidated RAC review of Revision 5.
With the exception of plan aspects relating to NUREI3 element A.2.b. (a requirement to state, by reference to specific acts, statutes, or codes, the legal basis for the autharity to carry out the restnnsibilities listed in A.2.a.,
i.e., all major response functions), the legal concern did not affect the FD% rating given to the technical or operational items related to NUREI3 elements.
( O / /ff'0.) 7 9 W
---.---------.----.-------------------.----------------------.----------------__m_
[ The issue of the participation of WALK FM radio was treated in the following
. manner. Via the September 18, 1986 LILCO letter transmitting Revision 8 to NRC, it came to FEMA's attention that on September 16, 1986, WALK FM had withdrawn from its agreement to serve as the Shoreham emergency broadcast primary station.
In that letter, LILCO also stated that a replacement station would be incorporated in the next plan revision. Based on the fact that the administrative processes for printing and delivering Revision 8 (which includes WM.K FM radio) had undoubtedly been completed by the time that LILCD was informed of WALK's withdrawal, FEMA evaluated element E.5, which depends on the participation of that particular radio staticn, as adequate. However, in any future reviews of the plan, element E.5 (and perhaps others) would be rated inadequate unless a suitable substitute station has been established and.is supported with the necessary letter (s) of agreement.
f l
In the spread sheets detailing the FEMA evaluation of LILOO's responses to the FEMA Post-Exercise Assessment, there are several instances where training was to have occurred by September 1, 1986. FEMA did not request rosters or take other steps to verify that such training took place. As stated in the evaluation portion of the spread sheets, the training's effectiveness would have to be evaluated in the future.
As you are adare, FEMA and the RAC have consistently supported the NRC in the Shoreham licensing process by reviewing numerous LILOO Transition Plan iterations sutrnitted to us for review under the provisions of the EU.
FEMA has expended a considerable amount of staff time and financial resources to provide for these reviews and subsequent expert witness testimony before various NRC licensing boards related to plan litigation. Further, at NRC's request, FEMA devoted additional resources to the preparation for and evaluation of the exercise of the LILOO plan.
At present, there are a number of unresolved issues being considered or litigated in no less than three different'NRC forums. There are planning and exercise issues before two licensing boards; numerous issues under consideration by the full Comission. In addition, the OL-3 Board has recently reopened the record on issues related to the Nassau Coliseum.
(A separate letter on these issues is being sent from FEMA's General Counsel to the NRC General Counsel.)
In FEMA's view, the fluidity of this great number of issues renders it impractical, and an unwise use of limited resources, to continue to perform further reviews of LILOO plans or exercises under the current unsynchronized manner in which these issues are being adjudicated. This works to the detriment of ef fective treatment of the issues from a programatic view-point.
Within the limits of sound management of resources, FEMA remains comnitted to providing testinony to assist in the resolution of the various issues before the NRC's licensing boards and to provide information which may be needed by the Comnission to resolve issues being considered by them.
o
. I hope'the enclosed information is helpful in your analysis of emergency preparedness issues concerning Shoreham.
I also hope it will assist you
~
in understanding FEMA's position relative to any request for. plan reviews and exercise activity.
Sincerely, c#-
Dave McLoughlin Deputy Assciate Director State and Ixx:al Programs and Support Enclosures As Stated i
L l
l l
l
I I
'LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 j
Key to Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 The Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) review of the LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham (Attachment I) is based upon planning criteria specified in NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1; Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, November,1980. The plan has been evaluated against each planning element specified in NUREG-0654 applicable to State and/or Local jurisdictions. These evaluations are keyed to the following rating system:
ADEQUATE RATING A (Adequate)
A* (Adequate - concerns pertaining to i
LERO's legal authority identified
.during this review)
The element is adequately addressed in The element is adequately addressed in
,the plan.
Recommendations for
.the plan provided concerns pertaining improvement shown in italic are not to LERO's legal authority are resolved.
mandatory, but their consideration The issues of legal authority affect-would further improve the LERO plan.
Ing these elements are described in These recommendations include to the RAC review of i
revisions to the NUREG-0654 cross-Revision ~5.
reference, and other minor improvements.-
r
,e
,--,---..-,-----------s.-----
w--
i
~
_E
~
LILCO' Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Key to Consolidated RAC Review 5
Dated December 15,1986 INADEQUATE RATING I (Inadequate) 1* (Inadequate - concerns pertaining to LERO's legal authority identified during this review)
The element is inadequately addressed The element is inadequately addressed in the plan for the reason (s) stated in in the plan for the reason (s) (not related bold type. The plan and/or procedures to legal concerns) stated in bold type.
must be revised before the element can The plan and/or procedures must be be considered adequate.
revised before the element can be considered adequate.
In addition, concerns pertaining to LERO's legal authority were identified by the RAC, and are described in to the review of Revision 5.
I k
,-.,-,,,,,_,nn-..
AT1'ACHMENT 1 i
LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated'RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 e
Page 1 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Comnent(s)
Rating A.
Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control)
A.I.a See review of Revision 5.
A*
A. I.b See review of Revision 5.
A A.I.e See review of Revision 5.
A A.1.d See review of Revision 5.
A*
A.1.e See review of Revision 5.
A A.2.a See review of Revision 5. In addition, two (2) key A*
positions have been added to the LERO organiza-tion.
The plan has been revised to add a traffic engineer i
to the staff at the EOC to evaluate any possible impediments to evacuation and to make recom-mendations on necessary changes to evacuation routes in response to potential impediments.
Another position, a LERO Spokesperson, and j
additional staff have been assigned to assure better coordination of information in the ENC.
A.2.b See review of Revision 5.
1*
A.3 See review of Revision 5. In addition, the following 1*
i comments pertaining to revised letters of agree-ment presented by LILCO with Revisions 7 and 8 are now applicable.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) - A letter of agreement with the FAA has been withdrawn by LILCO since responsibility for notifleation of the FAA has been shifted to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) via FEMA a= reecmmende.1 in the review of Revision 5 of the plan. However, based on results of the February 13, 1986 exercise and the RAC review of subsequent plan revisions it a
--,.,,-n,.
,---.,---..r-----
ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO SYansition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 Page 2 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating A.3 is recommended that LERO notify FAA directly I*
(Cont'd)
(see comments for element F.1.e in this review). In order to assure the most timely notification of FAA, LERO should again obtain a letter of agreement with FAA.
American Red Cross - The letter dated August 21, 1988 submitted with Revision 8 of the plan states that "
there is no agreement between Long faland Lighting Company and this (Nassau County) Chapter relating to the chapter % responsibility to provide emergency assistance during a
radiological emergency." This letter is not an acceptable letter of agreement to assure that American Red Cross responsibilities for Congregate Care facilities described in the plan will be carried out.
Teledyne Isotopes - The new purchase agreement with Teledyne Isotopes, Appendiz B, B-74A to 74D is,an agreement for the routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring program. No indication of detection limits or any assurance that there will be capability for analysis in the event of an I
emergency could be located in the plan. There is some mention of 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> emergency analysis; however, this reference is in regard to routine samples being over prescrioed limits.
In response to an issue identified at the February 13, 1986 exercise, the plan has been modified to include notification of the Long Island Railroad (LIRR).
These planning provisions are adequate but point of contact and telephone number for notification of the appropriate LIRR official (s) should be documented with a letter of understanding between LERO and the LIRR.
Congregate Care Centers - Neither of the two (2) congregate care facilities activated for the February 13, 1986 exercise are identified in the
i l
ATTACHMENT 1 l
LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review
'l Dated December 15,1986 Page 3 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating
)
A.3 latest submission of the LERO Plan.
The Plan (Cont'd) should be revised to include all facilities intended i
for use as shelter facilities during a radiological emergency at SNPS.
These facilities must be included in the list attached to LERO's letter of agreement with the American Red Cross.
It is noted that OPIP 3.8.3, p.
2, mentions contacting the U.S. Coast Guard for helicopters (paragraph 5.1.1.e).
There is no mention of helicopters in the Coast Guard letter of agreement contained in the plan.
Brookhaven Multiplex Cinemas - The new letter of agreement for the use of the Brookhaven Multiplex Cinemas parking lot as a bus transfer point, Appendix B, B-68A-B-68E, is acceptable.
A.4 See review of Revision 5.
A C.
Emergency Response Support and Resources C.1.a See review of Revision 5.
A*
C.1.b See review of Revision 5.
A C.1.c See review of Revision 5.
A C.2.a See review of Revision 5.
A C.3 See review of Revision 5.
A C.4 Specific reasons for the inadequate rating of this l'
element are detailed in analysis comments for' element A.3 in this review and the review of Revision 5.
D.
Emergency Classification System D.3 See review of Revision 5.
A
ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 e
Page 4 of 15
~
4.
r NUREC-0654 Element Review Conunent(s)
Rating D.4 See review of Revision 5.
A E.
Notification of Methods and Procedures E.1 See review of Revision 5.
A E.2 See review of Revision 5.
A E.5 See review of revision 5. In addition,it has come to A*
FEMA's attention via the letter of transmittal for Revision 8 of the Plan that WALK has withdrawn from its agreement to serve as the Shoreham Emergency Broadcast primary station. Based on Revision 8 which includes WALK FM Radio, this element has been rated as adequate. However, in future reviews of the plan this element will be rated inadequate unless a suitable primary EBS station has been established and is supported with the necessary letter (s) of agreement.
E.6 See review of Revision 5. It is recommended that A*
the EBS message recommending evacuation be revised to include a sentence urging people to be
" good neighbors" in an evacuation. Some suggested wording would be " Persons in the area to be evacuated are urged to be good neighbors and to assist one another by sharmg rides and otherwise helping others with problems."
It is also recommended that this same sentence be included in the public information brochure.
E.7 See review of Revision 5.
A F.
Emergency Communications F.1.a See review of Revision 5.
A F.1.b See review of Revision 5.
A
-.--g
..----.-~.v
--.,,.sm.--.-__--
ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986
\\
Page 5 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating F.1.c See review of Revision 5. In addition, the following I
comments are now applicable.
A letter of agreement with the FAA has been withdrawn by LILCO since responsibility for notification of the FAA has been shifted to the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) via FEMA as recommended in the review of Revision 5 of the plan. However, based on results of the February 13, 1986 exercise and the RAC review of subsequent -
plan revisions it is recommended that LERO notify FAA directly. In order to assure the most timely notification of FAA, LERO should again obtain a letter of agreement with FAA.
The plan, has been modified to include notification
.of the Long Island Railroad (LIRR). Procedure OPIP 3.3.2 Page 4 of Attachment 4, instructs the Support Services Coordinator to contact the LIRR at the Alert, or higher emergency classification, and to request closure of parts of the mainline if evacuations are called for in certain sectors.
Figure 3.3.4, page 4 specifies that the Long Island Railroad will be notified at the Site Area l
l Emergency and/or General Emergency ECLs. The l
LIRR should also be added to Figure 3.3.3 and to the notification diagram shown in Figure 3.3.5.
F.1.d See review of Revision 5.
A i
F.1.e See review of Revision 5.
A F.2 See review of Revision 5.
A F.3 See review of Revision 5.
A*
j
ATTACHNENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 Page 6 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Coannent(s)
Rating G.
Public Education and Information G.I.a-d See review of Revision 5. It is recommended that A
the public information brochure include information to encourage boaters in the EPZ to listen to Chanel 16 so that they can receive radio notification in the event of an emergency at Shoreham.
G.2 See review of Revision 5.
A G.3.a See review of Revision 5.
A*
G.4.a See review of Revision 5.
A G.4.b See review of Revision 5. In addition, the following I
comments are now applicable.
Insufficient copying capabilities at the ENC resulted in delays in the distribution of information during the February 13,1986 exercise. These delays affected the following two (2) areas:
Hard copies of EBS messages were not provided to the media in a timely manner.
- Rumor control personnel were not able to answer questions received from the public because they were not given accurate up-to-date status reports.
LERO should make provisions for reliable and ra'pid equipment to reproduce, in hard copy, all appro-priate messages for distribution to the ENC staff.
The plan has been modified to create an additional position, LERO Spokesperson, and additional staff have been assigned to assure better coordination of information in the ENC. The LERO spokesperson is responsible for coordinating the release of infor-mation working in conjunction w1th the County Executive, or his designee, if he chooses to 4
ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 Page 7 of 15
~
NUREG-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating G.4.b participate. The LERO spokesperson will represent (Cont'd)
LERO at press conferences. Press releases are to be distributed to utility, government and media personnel at the ENC.
As provided in OPIP 3.8.1, Section 5.2.4, changes in important emergency information will be elec-tronically transmitted to Rumor Control District
- offices and call boards via TSO printout (also see OPIP 3.8.1, Section 5.3.4).
LILCO is still evaluating the lack of hard copy capability for distribution of EBS messages to the press in the ENC.
Until LILCO completes the evaluation of this equipment for providing hard copies of EBS messages to the media, the response to this element is rated inadequate.
Also see eomment for element G.4.c in this review.
G.4.c See review of Revision 5.
This element is rated I
inadequate for the same reason given for element G.4.h of this review.
G.5 See review of Revision 5.
A H.
Emergency Facilities and Equipment H.3 See review of Revision 5.
A H.4 See review of Revision 5.
A*
H.7 See review of Revision 5.
A H.10 See review of Revision 5.
A H.11 See review of Revision 5.
A 1
H.12 See review of Revision 5.
A i
ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 i
Page 8 of 15 NUREC-0654 Element Review Comunent(s{
Rating I.
Accident Assessment 4
I.7 See review of Revision 5.
A I.8 See review of Revision 5.
A I.9 See review of Revision 5.
A I.10 See review of Revision 5. In addition, two (2) plan A
changes have been made to address lasues identified at the February 13,1986 exercise.
The plan has been modified in OPIP 3.5.2 Section 3.6, to require that when field data are received, the data is identified as an actual measurement or as extrapolated data. All extrapolated data are now l
to be posted under " projected data" on the status board.
Procedure OPIP 3.5.2, Section 3.5 has been revised to specify that all distances reported by DOE-RAP teams are to be recorded in miles.
i i
I.11 See review of Revision 5.
A J.
Protective Response J.2 See review of Revision 5.
A J.9 See review of Revision 5. In addition, the following I
comments are now applicable.
Revisions to Attachment 1 of procedure OPIP 3.6.6 reflect the current FDA response level tables including all footnotes which are necessary for i
proper use of the numeric data contained in the j
tables.
= - - -.
ATTACHMENT 1
' LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated FAC Review Dated December 15,1986 Page 9 of 15 NUREC-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating J.9 As discussed in the Post Exerelse Assessment of the (Cont'd)
February 13, 1986 exercise, delays were observed in the dispatch of bus drivers due to delays in issuing dosimetry and in the briefing of bus drivers and transfer point coordinators. This element is rated inadequate until the plan is revised to accomplish timely distribution of dosimetry to,the large number of Bus Drivers required to be dispatched from the Patebogue Staging Area.
This inadequate rating also affects element J.10.g of this review.
J.10.a See review of Revision 5.
In addition, Procedure A*
OPIP 4.2.5 provides details on the set up and use of LILCO's Bellmore, Hicksville and Roslyn Operations Centers as reception centers for evacuees in the event of Shoreham radiologichl emergency.
i J.10.b See review of Revision 5.
A J.10.c See review of Revision 5.
A*
J.10.d See review of Revision 5.
A J.10.e See review of Revision 5.
Several issues involving I
emergency worker knowledge and use of KI were identified at the February 13,1986 exercise. This element has been rated inadequate because bus drivers used for school evacuation have not been trained in KI policy and the use of KL Sufficient supplies of KI are not available for school evacuation Bus Drivers.
(1)
Bus Drivers used for school evacuation should be trained in KI policy and the use of KI.
(2)
Adequate supplies of KI should be provided for Bus Drivers used for school evacuation.
LILCO's commitment to provide training and equip-ment for exposure control to school bus drivers is
-+w-e-
--+o-
+--e..=-e,.>---im e-*-.--,---
--,.,-:e--,.--y.-c-ww-e+'
r---
m
- --------------w,---,--.,..-e-
---,--e+--yw
ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 u-q; : Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986
.y e
Page 10 of 15 NUREC-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating J.10.e understood. However, it is not evident in the plan (Cont'd) how these non-LERO workers are to be informed that they need to initiate the request.
J.10.f See review of Revision 5.
A*
J.10.g See review of Revision 5.
This element is rated I
inadequate for the same reason given for the inadequate rating of element J.9 in this review.
J.10.h The letter from the American Red Cross to LILCO I
dated August 21,1988 (see Appendix B pages B-11 to B11-d), states that the American Red Cross has not agreed to respond to a radiological emergency at Shoreham (see lines 1-4 page B-11a). Page B-11b implies that the American Red Cross only works with and through the government. It also states that letters of agreement between the American Red Cross and owners of a faellity to be used as a shelter will be entered into at the time of an incident.
This polley is unworkable.
The new material submitted for Appendix B raises many questions concerning the participation of the American Red Cross in a Shoreham incident, not only in the operation of shelters but also in connection with EOC participation. It is FEMA's position that letters of agreement are required for all facilities which are planned to be used in an emergency response.
J.10.1 See review of Revision 5.
A J.10.]
See review of Revision 5.
A*
J.10.k This element has been rated inadequate for the 1*
reason (i.e., snow removal resources and procedures) specified in the review of Revision 5.*
- lt should be noted that one (1) RAC member felt that this element should be rated adequate (A).
5
ATTACHMENT 1
._;.c e
.x LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8
- nc
- Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 Page 11 of 15 NUREC-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating J.10.k In response to an exercise issue, the plan has been (Cont'd) revised to add a traffic engineer to the staff at the EOC to evaluate any possible impediments to evae-ation and to make recommendations on necessary changes to evacuation routes in response to poten-tial impediments.
Procedures for field workers, i.e., bus drivers, traffic guides, etc., have been modified to include instructions to make prompt notifications through their communication network of any potential Impediment. Provisions have been made to issue an EBS message in the event that changes to evacuation routes are necessary.
Internal communications within the LERO EOC
, regarding assessment of an response to evacuation impediments has been adequately addressed through modification to the procedures (esp. OPIP 3.6.3, Traffic Control). The Evacuation Route coordinator is responsible for obtaining periodic updates from the Evacuation Route Spotters, and for immediately reporting road impediments or other problems to the Traffic Control Coordinator and Road Logistics Coordinator (See OPIP 3.6.3, Section 5.6.7) Lead Traffic Guides (at the staging areas) are to report any incident.
l J.10.1 See review of Revision 5.
A l
J.10.m See review of Revision 5.
A l
J.11 See review of Revision 5.
A J.12 See review.of Revision 5. In addition, the following I
comments are now applicable.
i l
The LERO Reception Center previously designated at the Nassau County Veterans Memorial Coliseum has been changed to three (3) LILCO facilities located =in Bellmore, Hicksville and Roslyn. The adequacy of these facilities as reception centers must be evaluated at a future exercise.
m
-e,
- w a n-ne - - - wr r---,-
--.n-
- - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
=.
ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 g
Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 Page 12 of 15 NUREC-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating J.12 In addition to the change of Reception Center (s)
(Cont'd) location, the plan specifies (see page 3.9-5 of Revision 8) that a screening process will be used to check evacuees for contamir.ation.
Incoming vehicles will be directed to monitoring stations where the vehicle and driver will be checked for contamination.
According to this screening procedure, passengers of the vehicle will also be assumed to be uncontaminated and a clean tag will be issued to them if the driver is below contamina-tion limita. This screening procedure is inadequate since the applicable guidance requires the capability of monitoring within about a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> period all residents and transients in the plume EPZ arriving at thie Reception Centers.
LERO is responsible for monitoring all evacuees l
arriving at reception centers. It is not adequate.to P an for this monitoring with personnel and l
l equipment when available.
It is not possible to i
evaluate the number of personnel required for monitoring at the special population reception I
centers since the plan shows in procedure OPIP 3.8.5 pages 21-37, "to be arranged" for most of the speelal population reception centers.
K.
Radiological Exposure Control K.3.a See review of Revision 5. Several issues involving I
emergency worker knowledge and use of dosimetry were identified at the February 13, 1986 exercise.
This element has been rated inadequate because dosimetry and training were not provided to the Bus Drivers used for school evacuation.
(1)
Bus Drivers used for school evacuation should be trained in the use of dosimeters.
(2)
Adequate supplies of dosimetry should be provided for Bus Drivers used for school
. evacuation.
e
-, - ~ - - -
n---.-,,-m.-+,--r,-mm--
,,,,.,rw_,m-.,-
--_---,m-
AT1'ACHMENT 1 l
LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review i
Dated December 15,1986 Page 13 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Comment (s)
Rating K.3.a LILCO% commitment to provide training and (Cont'd) equipment for exposure control to school bus drivers is understood. However, it is not evident in the plan how these non-LERO workers are to be informed that they need to initiate the request.
K.3.b See review of Revision 5.
This element is rated I
inadequate for the same reason given for element E.3.a in this review.
K.4 See review of Revision 5.
This element is rated I
inadequate for the same reason given for element K.3.a in this review.
K.S.a See review of Revision 5.
A K.S.b See review of Revision 5.
A L.
Medical and Public Health Support L.1 See review of Revision 5.
A L.3 See review of Revision 5.
A L.4 See review of Revision 5.
A M.
Recovery and Reentry Planning and Postaccident Operations M.1 See review of Revision 5.
A M.3 See review of Revision 5.
A M.4 See review of Revision 5.
A N.
Exercises and Drills N.1.a See review of Revision 5.
A*
N.1.b See review of Revision 5.
A*
=-
ATTACHMENT 1 ham - Revision 8 LILCO Transition Plan for Sh@ieview Consolidated RAC t Dated December 15,1986 Page 14 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Consnent(s)
Rating N.2.a See review of Revision 5.
A N.2.c See review of Revision 5.
A N.2.d See review of Revision 5.
A N.2.e.(1)
See review of Revision 5.
A N.3.a-f See review of Revision 5.
A N.4 See review of Revision 5.
A N.5 See review of Revision 5.
A O.
liadiological Emergency Response Training O.1 See review of Revision 5.
A O.1.b See review of Revision 5.
A O.4 See review of Revision 5.
In addition, it is A
suggested that LILCO consider requiring that training be provided per module 11 to personnel assigned to the Emergency Worker Decontamination Facility and the Reception Centers. It would also be adviseable to consider requiring training per module 11 for personnel assigned to the following positions:
Emergency Medical Coordinator, Hospital Coordinator, and Ambulance Coordinator.
O.5 See review of Revision 5.
A P.
Responsibility for the Planning Effort P.1 See review of Revision 5.
A*
P.2 See review of Revision 5.
A*
P.3 See review of Revision 5.
A*
P.4 See review of Revision 5.
A*
- 6 ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 o
Consolidated RAC Review Dated Decemtsr 15,1986 Page 15 of 15 NUREG-0654 Element Review Consnent(s)
Rating P.5 See review of Revision 5.
A*
P.6 See review of Revision 5.
A P.7 See review of Revision 5.
A P.8 See review of Revision 5.
A P.10 See review of Revision 5.
A 1
f i
4
.c
,, _ ~, _ _,... _
- r. -.
",-w
..-c._,,-
T s
TABLE 3.1 SHOREHAM NUCLEAR r0WER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRFCTING DEFtCIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise LElto EOC Page 1 of 16 2.-
3 33
.5*
OUU "3
e ow
=o ga vu$
30,
c..
4,*
e m.
el E**
12 "
E"3 1 ~: 3
=5 a
6-g ss ono
.9 M
fh o
M No.
RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action
}gj LERO Respunse ( ACTION)
FENA Evaluation of,LERO Response E[
0y 1
J.10.k Delays in responding to the two (2)
D Procedures have been 5/26/86 The plan has been revised to A
1 evacuation impediment free-play reviewed and revised add a traffic engineer to the messages inserted at the LERG EOC vere to ensure information staff at the EOC to evaluate caused by the fatture to inform the on impediments is any possible tapediments to Evacuation Coordinator in a timely promptly passed to all evacuation and. to make recoa-manner.
In addition there was a lack relevant personnel and mandations on necessary changes of internal communication in response a coordinated response to evacuation routes in to these tapediment problems.
Per-implemented.
In addt-response to potentist tapedt-tinent information was not included on
- tion, a
Traffic ments.
Procedures for field the 1045 and 1106 LERO Message Forms Engineer has been
- workers, i.e.,
bus drivers, from the Evacuation Route Coordinator added to the LERO EOC traffic guides, etc., have been to the Erscuation Support Communicator staff to mestet in modified to include instruc-l for Route Spotters / Road Crews regarding evaluating and tions to make prompt nottit-the simulated impediment involving the developing alternate cations through their communi-gravel truck and fuel truck problems.
routing.
cation network of any potential i
As a result of this lack of informa-Impediment.
provisions have tion, the tipeJiment problems were not The Traffic Guidance 5/26/86 been made to tesue an ERS analysed in a timely fashion and Table Top TT-6 has message in the event that incomplete equipment was dispatched to been modified to changes to evacuation routes handle the gravel truck tapediment in incorporate the are necessary.
the fletd.
Internal communtenttons changes to the pro-procedures should be reviewed and cedures.
Attachment Internal communications within revised as necessary to ensure that 1.
the LERO EOC regarding assess-information on impediments is promptly ment of and response to evacus-gJ _..
1 i
tion impediments have been 1
l passed both up the chain of command to l
the Evacuation Coordinator and downward adequately addressed through and laterally to all lead coordinators modification to the procedures under the Evacuation Coordinator and (esp. OPIP 3.6.3, Traf fic Con-their staffe.
Additional training to trol).
The Evacuation Route needed to ensure that the procedures.
Coordinator is responsible for uhether new or current. are properly obtaining periodic updates from
e TAtt.E 1.t SHOREHAM NUCt. EAR POWER STATION - SCHEDUI.E FOR CORRECTING DErtCIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 11, 1986 Exercise I.ERO EOC (Cont'd)
Page 2 of 16 ib a-s.^
Ogt
->d c
ut eo uw u
4 Ha
=v5 20.
co-E!
E**
1*"
E%I t ~t *
=5 er g.
~ " ss ono a
. f M
O No.
RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action g <U t.ERO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evalualinn of.t.ERO Response k
[, 0 e u
..s I
Cont'd implemented.
All coordinators at the the Evacuation Route Spotters, EOC. and those who intttate messages, and immediately reporting road must be trained to include all per-Impediments or other problems tinent information on the t.ERO message to the Traffic Control Co-forms and to analyse the equipment ordinator and Road legistics requirements to clear impediments.
Coordinator (see OPIP 3.6.3, Sec.
5.6.7).
Isad Traffic Cutdes (at the staging a'reas) are to report any incident that has the potential for slowing the evacuation based on reports from Traffic Guides in the l
fletd to the Traffic Control Point Coordinator in the I.ERO EOC (OPIP 3.6.3, Sec. 5.3.6).
Upon nott'ication of a road impediment from the Evacuation Route Coordinator, the Road Logistics Coordinator is re-1 sponsible for ensuring that an adequate number of suitable road crew vehicles are dis-patched to respond to the impediment (see Ortr 3.6.1, Sec. 5.5.10).
The plan modtitcation ade-quately addresses the issues raised in the esercise. Effec-tive use of these plan modii1-cations should be evaluated at
- f etwee-enerei.e.
TABLE 3.1 SHOREHAM NUCt. EAR FOWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING Q)RRECTtWE ACTION February 13, 1986 Esercise LERG EOC (Cont'd)
Page 3 of 16
.aC O I ^b Q'*
.22" dy w~
wa e
--Q ta Em"
<,3 3*l e
E*~
g3; at:
2*R Gga
=me ona
-uS 2R El*
.*gE No.
RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action fg LERO Response ( ACTION)
FEMA Evaluetion el.LERO Response AE k0$
m 2
F.I.c There was some confusion regardtag the ARCA The FAA will be con-5/2e/86 A letter of agreement with the i
I method for motifying the Federal tacted as part of the FAA has been withdrawn by Aviation Administration (FAA).
FEMA FRERF respoase.
LILCO, since responsibility for The plan.and training nottitcation of the FAA has (t) The LERO procedures should be re-will be modtited been shifted to the U.S.
viewed and revised as necessary to accordingly as part of Department of Transportation ensure that a potet of contact Rev. 7.
(DOT) via FEMA as recommended with the FAA has been destgaated.
la the review of Rev. 5 of the plan.
- However, based on (2) The LERG EOC ' staff should be '
results of the Feb. 13, 1986 trained in the appropriate pro-esercise and the RAC review of cedures so that the FAA can be subsequent plan revisions it is notifled in a timely manner.
recommended that 1.ERO notify FAA directly (see commente for element F.I.c in the plan review of Revision 8).
In order to assure the most timely nottitcation of
- FAA, LER^
should again obtain a letter of agreement with FAA.
h
>l Training of LERO personnel l
responsible for nottftcation of I
FAA should be verified at a future esercise.
I 9
9 T
s TABLE 3.1 SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February I), 1986 Esercise LERO EOC (Cont'd)
Page 4 of 16 k-r 8*a QC
.:aC u5 U
E-x, g a -.,
- EE G
Y U E.
,, E "
%,%,e N
as e, e
-u.
o o
No.
BAC Recosamendation for Corrective Action g
LERO Respunse (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of LERO Response IE f, 0 $.
.aC 3
E.I.
Stace there are no procedures for ARCA The procedere wt!! be 9/l/86 The plan has been modified to g
g F.I.a nottitcation of the long Island modified in Rev. 8 to include nottitcation of the Rattroad (LIRR) in the Flan, the LIRR Include a phone call lang Island Rattroad (LIRR).
was not nottfied during the eteretse.
to the LIRR.
LERO Procedure OPIP 3.3.2, Page 4 of training will be modt-Attachment 4,
instructs the (B) The LERO procedures should be fled accordingly.
Support Services Coordinator to revised to establish a potat of contact the LIRR at the Alert, contact and a means of motifytag or higher emergency classtitca-the LIRR.
tion, and to request closure of parts of the mainline if evac-(2) The LERO EOC staff should be nations are called for ta trained to the resteed procedures certain sectors.
I so that the LIRR can be notifled Figure 3.3.4 specifies that the in a timely manner.
long letand Rattroad will be mattfted at the Site Area Emer-gency and/or General Emergency ECLa. The LIRR should also be added to Fig. 3.3.3 and to the nottitcation diagram shown in Fig.
3.3.5.
These planntag provisions are adequate but point of contact and telephone number for notification of the appropriate LIRR official (s) should be documented with a letter of understanding between LERO and the long Island Ratt-road.
Training of LERO per-sonnel responsible for nottit-cation of LIRR should be
--zees-a.,. u. gas....m _
r
s TAst.E 3.1 SHOREHAPt NUC3. EAR POWt.R STATION - SCHEDOLE FOR CORRF.CTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACT!4H6 February 11. 1986 Exercise LERG EOC (Cont'd)
Page 5 of 16 n
a 0 " ^d Q"
SC "S"
- w st
=o w
==5 20.
a.:
4.5 U"j e
E*-
g:-
a--
G-ga "13 2:1 "u"
21 El:
- e
..k h Isa.
RAC Recosamendation for Corrective Action g
LERO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of.LERO Response I
4 1.80 The dose assessment status board in the ARCA The dose assessment 9/1/86 LERO's modtitcation of the dose A
I accident assessment area had to accee-board will be modifled assessment status board to modate both DOE RAF and Lit.C0 field to acc M ate data acc W ate data from both monitoring data.
There were not enough free both DOE-RAP DOE /RAF teams and LILCO teams columns on the board to keep the tuo teams and Lit.C0 teams.
to adequate.
Training of the (2) sources of data separated.
LERO LERO dose assessment staff to should enlarge the dose assessment make effective use of the status board to accommodate a clear modified status board should be separation between the data reports evaluated at a future esercise.
from the DOE RAF and LILCO ftold monttoring teams.
1 l
TAst.E 3.l SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORNECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTitHI February 13. 1986 Esercise
Page 6 of I6 5
3.h o
~
000
., 5 ".
~3,Q c
- o u
w d.:
t.
co-3"
=-E*~
a*:
E%
gIc 33!
I t" ett No.
RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action
}g LERO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of I.ERO Response E[
!0e m
5 1.10 The downwind distance of the sample was ARCA A!!
material for 9/l/86 Frocedure OPIP 3.5.2. 'Section A
1 F.I.4 incorrectly reported as 7000 meters transmission of field 3.5 has been revised to spectfy lastead of 700 meters for one of the date will be reviewed that all distences reported by thyroid doses reported by a DOE RAP to ensure IER' and DOE DOE-RAF teams are to be field monitoring team.
This error was practices are con-recorded in miles, caused by a decimal potat misplaced sistent.
To be in-during the conversion of the distance cluded in Rev. 8.
The plan modifications ade-units and meant that the initial quately address the exercise calculation of thyroid dose based on issue.
Implementation of this this measurement was 9000 mrem /hr at change should be evaluated at a 4.3 miles downwind instead of 9000 future exercise.
mrem /hr at about 0.5 miles downwind.
l About five (5) minutes elapsed before this arror was found and corrected.
All downwind distances from the field should be reported consistently in either miles or meters.
9 I
n TABLE 3.1 SNORENAM NUCl EAR FOWER STATION - SOIEDUIE FOR CORRECTING DEFIC < ENCIRS OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTitH4 February 13, 1986 Exercise
Page 7 of 16 m
o
~
n..
a.n
- D
..q ES:
4.3
==5 S *3 23-oa; o.-
tta
?;w 23-e' d
- : a Ou*
gg 27*
ggg No.
RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action gg 1.ERO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of.LERO Response E[
$ 0.$.
u
.m 6
1.10 During the reporting of the initial DOE ARCA t.ERO procedures will 9/1/86 The plan has been modified, A
I RAF thyroid doses, only one field be reviewed and a note OP!F 3.5.2, Section 3.6, to re-measurement, the 1400 mrem /hr measure-added to ensure better quire that when field data to ment made at about 1204 at two (2) coordination and received, the data is identi-ettee from the plant, was available.
accurate use of field fled as an actual measurement This value was used at the R.ERO EOC to data.
To be incor-or se estrapolated data.
All estrapolate doses at other distances.
parated in Rev. 8.
extrapolated data are now to be These entrapolated data were reported posted under " projected data" as actual measuremente at other dis-on the status inerd.
tances rather than as projected data on the dose ansessment status board.
It the plan modification-e ade-took tuo and one half (2.5) hours to quately address the exercise tdentif y and correct this error.
1.ERO tesse.
Implementation of this
. reporting procedures should be restewed change should be vertfled at a to ensure proper coordination and future exercise.
proper reporting.
e
\\
T TABLE 3.1 SII0itEHAM NHCI. EAR PENER STATION - SQlETMILE FOR CORRECTING l>EFICIENCIES g
OR AREAS REQO1 RING CORRECTIVE ACTitWI February 11, 1986 Esercise LERO EOC (Cont'd)
Page 8 of 16 3.
2 8
<w OCU
" 3 "b c
eo e
mo ow B "I
=~5
- t..
4 c.-
=;;
o a
ita 2.21
-==
- a 25 2"3 tB cu Ida.
RAC Recosamendation for Corrective Action gg4 t.ERO Response ( ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of,l.ERO Response E[
$ 0.E.
u
.m 7
1.10 Alt hough he later quoted the PAC ARCA The Health Services 6/19/86 Lilip's commitment to provide A
I correctly when asked to do so by a Coordinator has been the Health Services Coordinator Federal evaluator, during a briefing provided with review with review materlat on the use held at the LERG EOC at about Ill0, the material on the use and meaning of the EPA FAC's is Health Services coordinator misstated and meaning of the EPA an adequate response.
White the EPA PAG as being mandatory evacu-PAG's.
this is not an issue requiring atton when the projected thyroid dose revision of the
- plan, the was five (5) Rem.
The Health Services effectiveness of the llealth Coordinator should review the EPA PAC Services Curdinator's training guidance in order to avoid any poesthle should be evaluated at a future confusion that could result due to mis-exercise.
Information given during briefings.
l I
I
e e
6
" U _3" ag$-
1
^u,: g0 f
1 o
9. co".u< : e $a.
ega
-a ~
- 1e:E P
s A
n< ~.%5lE
~
- 31 = E e
ed - l ee s
h eaat s n
t t ciai o
aicuc p
vf rqr s
ii eee t
e at t md x R
hcomae ano t
O c
R et E
s b pon L.
t i
n mt a f
el o h
t r
o ml r
e t i p o
n i w i o o
m art o mm p
t i
oef ta ct ot u
s n
y s oe S
la s st e is E
v rt t n.
I E
'O n a aoe p
C C. e nrpu N
A t r oes s E
M i t sipes I
E Lsat ori C
F e
I F
ED G
.:o A
/
N co
- ag" N
I TCW o:1og Er i K
T K C l t - o O A e l r at
)
C s
N iac Ei O
R I
w pi n
V c f r o O
T 4
I r i oi F Te)
C m st i t
C xd A
e aor a EL E E 't npr
(
t R
s e
U 8 D R6 n e
yd p
O8 o s
s et
,o 1 Eti C 9 (C n
t p o
n amt l 1
F. C. G p
vos a e
t s
r ei B. N
,C ri 1
e t pt c A
I O
R t
T E
s c r
R1 I
a a e
N O
nm U y O QrO R
e om I
R E
hefi o E a T R uE L
1b ot c A
rL T Sb S
A e EF R
nbQ* aS R
E A
W e3,=* gu g C
A O R R
O na~ u=EOOg A
P R
AE I
n t meny C
o neh ol i
i i
et til N
t ms t a c
e yf au M
A gso vt A
a i c H
e nn t a E
t v
ae c
R mr rAe i
O a
t t
c Os p b
HS e
C
.d r
L e s el r
I h as u o
Lt i o C
d ch
.t ers r
eat e o
sh as me f
i t ve er c
i t u n
r nt 6 st o
eoc8 yu i
xt a9 sf t
ee 1
a l
ecb
,n e d
e eh n
h e I
t e
r m
td I
a t
t o
oe oy s n s
i t h nt c
t s ed e
R r
d uh e e
oel rt t C
i d ub s
A r a oef e R
P mwF ot e" I "
6 E
"NM 0
8 e
08 4
e 1
e TABIE 3.1 SHOREllAM NilCLEAR PtWER SI'ATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTisHI February 13, 1986 Esercise LERG EOC (Cont'd)
Page 10 of 16
.$ A
- ']
- s u w
.w 0:d wo::
%~:
3"l
- 1 e
a--
.t r a a
- u.:.
c
=
No.
RAC Recosusendation for Corrective Action fg}
- 1. FRO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluat ion of R.ERO Response E
fh
..u a
9 E.2 There was a delay of about forty-five ARCA Procedures and train-9/i/86 The plan has been modified (See A
I (45) minutes between the I. ERG EOC's ing will be revised to OrtP 3.6.3 Sections 3.1, 5.2.4
- 1005 verify the fuel truck impediment personnel assignment.
and 5.4.2), to assure that all first attempt to have Route Spotter allow flexibility in Impediments to evacuation will and the dispatch of that spotter from This will ensure that be promptly
- reported, that the Port Jefferson Staging Area.
This personnel are immedt-additional personnel are dis-delayed timely vertitcation of the stely dispatched for patched in an expedited sanner, impediment.
Personnel need to be impediment verifica-and that there to coordination trained in the development of alterna-tion or other evacue-between the Traffic Control Co-tive approaches when delays are tion exigency.
ordinator, the Evacuation Coor-reasonably anticipated in the field dinator and the Erscuation verification of topediments to evacua-Route Coordinator. The Evacus-tion.
Development of alternatives tion Route Coordinator is should include consultation be' tween, at responsible for obtaining pert-a minimum, the Evacuation Coordinator odic updates from Evacuation and the Evacuation Route Coordinator.
Route Spottere (See OPIP 3.6.3, Section 5.6.7).
The plan modt-fications adequately address the exerctae issue.
The effectiveness of training of the Evaluation Route Coor-dinator and communications with Route Spotters via Staging Areas should be evaluated at a future exercise.
I
T s
TABLF. 3.1 SHOREllAM NUCIEAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFtCIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise LERO EOC *(Cont'd)
Page it of 16 3.
3
~.3, n
.e
- C. "
o s.
ua g
o
- a
.s
- S gg 2l*
e gg Cu No.
RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action ggj l.ERO Response ( ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of LERO Response EE
$$N u
m 10 N/R Only the Shoreham-Wading River School ARCA Schools will be re-N/A IERO's commitment that schools A
I District participated in the February quested to participate will be requested to partict-13, 1986 exercise.
Prior to the in future esercises.
pate in future exercises is esercise, LILCO management made the adequate.
dectalon that other school districts were not to be included in the exercise.
In the future all schools must be included in 'all Federally evaluated exercises and drille.
q e-(
I I
^
n 6
2 3" iE.
1 s.;i0 w
f I
o 5.e * ; i 8,sm.
2 1
eg
' a
.=1ic a
P h.
t<
I
- cEi e
ers - esy s
d ouwh re n
ifb ot eh.
o v
H k t t p
o l
nr s
s r
o i o e
R n o wt u e
pt a
h
.t h q e
O om cd nO e
R t r
R t ps oe E i
od E.
L d e uot i eh t.
t qt s v n e r e nmt f
or o
e e
l noe m
od t f t n
t r no ene o
id un t
i mn sil n
e t
ma t
o sh t
o o
c i t e n au c
t b
i S
l ge t w a
snrsio o o E
v
,h i ur t t I
E
'O nse C
Ci ovrn d
N A
L a pi eaee E
M I r sr vl r e I
E Lt ed epan w
C F
I FED
- t *."? u A
G
/
N I
T N
.Ia?
C O E
I R T R C o-
- - ndl l l n O A e t t nnonaf oo
)
C N
R I
mart o
twp s
iiii an Ei O
u V c O
T mrpi s
c e
I r yot t
r o
F C
s ed T e )d d c d
A a upn C x a
e c l
EL E E 't e
d r
a e
(
i l
R rsi y
U R6 n e
s a r 1 D t v a e
r e
O8 o s
i n
ob t
v 3 E C 9 (C r
f ed oi H
o s
p o mis t r 1
EC G p
i y vr LS N,
s b
d t
B 3c e
o n s oe i
o rt s t
A I
o R
t s
pet s
T IR1 d
E Oe e
me e
N O
Cdt l
t l u
U y O QrG R
Li ngpd eb sq R
I E a E
I b eninooaue T
E L
Lamicatdtb r R u A
rL T Sb S A e EF en4~Ry-R R
A E A
- = E g C
WO R
RO s
=E E g A
P RA lE.
n nr l n ys C
o eo oi r r U
i N
ef o
t e t
b h
e v c
cd mi M
A d
se l
r A
l t e n
eD l
e os i
o E
v nu a
d s R
i rr u n O
H ee ot B o tc i
S e
v r f
f t
r ae
. o a
r r
h v e
o u
b s f
i o
d r
c r
C gD e
e a
sd v n
sdt e e e r
ul e i
i d o
n s um l i l
f u
ot p v i
o aB h e po o
sso n
r urh o
n r
d s
p t e o e
c i
hi vnf s
t t t i oo e
a d
d n
a ri eb r n
ao u Dt e t
o c
a s adf e
t m
a uu ul a
y v
c qud so rd e sae e oe c
t e uvh dh s e
edl B et A s u R
mio l vo C
eoh
)
)
A orc 1
2 R
D ps
(
(
, a.
- 3. 5
.al
- K.
Hg K
l o
N I
l!ll ll,
t TABLE 3.1 SHOREHAM NifCI. EAR POWER STATION - SCllEDUt.E FOR CORMECTING DEFECIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CURRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exerclac LERO EOC (Cont'd)
Page 13 of 16
~ %~
u n8*e Q"
.. O st d
.5 S"
o 4
ga uuQ lt, c
E*~
13 E1 1:3 M.I
~ 6
=5
."EU E
e o a ca a
$00 55 5hh
..$ 0 E No.
RAC Recomumendation for Corrective Action ggy LFR0 Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evalualion of.LERO Response 4c c
~
12 J.10.e Some of the Ambulette Drivers were not ARCA Training of ambulance /
9/l/86 There are no plan modifications A
1 aware of when to take their KI.
Train-ambulette drivers is necessary to address this exer-Ing on KI procedures should be given to being s"cheduled and cise issue. The LILCO response the Ambulette Drivers.
will be revised to indicates that the training provide increased en-program has been modified to phasis on dostmetry place additional emphasis on and radiological
- pro-emergency worker protective tactive actions for actions and that training of emergency workers.
ambulance /ambulette drivers has been scheduled, t
1 t
o l
I l
s TABLE 3.1 SHOREHAM NUCLEAR FOWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFtCtENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February li. 1986 Exercise LERO EDC (Cont'd)
Page 14 of 16 e
20 30 87d 8
S-
,; Q E.*
=
Ha o-MI 2**
13 1:1
-; ; 3 h" 0" 0 55 S a "o ji$
- 3 a
ono
~a is -
No.
RAC Recosusendation for Corrective Action gg4U LERO Response (ACTION) pg.MA Evaluation c1,LERO Response EE u
..$ 0 E s
13 J.10.e Bus Drivers used for school evacuation ARCA See LERO EOC tten ll.
N/A LILCO's commitment to provide I
have not been trained in KI policy and training and equipment for ex-the use of KI.
Sufficient supplies of posure control to school bus K1 are not available for school drivers is understood.
How-evacuation Bus Drivers.
ever, it is not evident in the plan how these non-LERO workers (1) Bus Drivers used for school are to be informed that they evacuation should be trained in K!
need to intttate the request.
policy and the use of Kt.
(2) Adequate supplies of K1 should he
)covided for Bus Drivers used for I
school evacuation.
t e
6 P
S I
i t
i I
6 O**
1 -
1 S*1 f
1 o
b.U<
3 s.
5 1
e g
a
- 1:o p
w.%:=E A
wE1:s a e
s - egof ef s s
nrsnt ovoa n
oeni i
h o
i s on t
p t epid scgs s
a saeie n r e
cs erist ie R
ii rt f aon v i h ri i fh O
i t O d ppa r R
d C
om rd e m e t
E osL h L.
msI e
t eL r
t n
t l
nr l e at e
ad e e
ak l dht e h e nr l.
n pat ab oo ud t
o h
i w b e oo
.t st d sl i
nt ai nau ta e
h d a/d u
eyus d y ee S
l r rse ac ch a
aast m nsnc E
v si aa enas I
E es cr egol C
r eeigcri un N
A ecad oaetb e E
M h el nrl mcme I
E T ncippeaab CI F
F.W I
G
.a A
/
N I
,o03rou N
T C. N w:1e o
F i
M T R C O
)
A e C
N s
Ei O
R I
2 V c 1
O T
F r)
C s
t f e A
e E. C x d
(
t t E E 't R
t 1 uR6 n e
D U8 o s
C 1E C
n O
H C9(
o E
1 EC LS G p
s O
N,
B 1M e
R I
A -
R E
R1 T
E L
I N
O U y O QrG R
e I
R I
e E a T
E R u I
S A
rL T
Sb S
A e EF R
^dQ* :w R
E A
A W
- g * :" g C
oR R
pO b guE:*-
A RA EL n
d nt ce-C o
einib r l
i i
n el o
N t
i vb h
c a s eudt' M
A r e pl u A
s H
e o e ua t
s E
v d h o
e l
h R
l t
er i
a s O
l r
r u t
aene ud H
c S
e zin s e s
r t i e
oc r
po r
o r og e xr o
n os d v ep C
tt ei e uoh r e
r r at t Del o
e vb f
w i
t a
n a ees c n
sah vt s i
o r c w ot el e
b ecp i
t v
al x p
a od ue a i
d rhn b
n D wau m nd e
r A
m u
o n a
egf s a
so t n o o c
t i p
d n e
ed sx.eo ni R
l r s e ua e at t C
b gc caa A
mexf A r r R
A r eopt t 4
w"lc K
8gs
.o 4
N 1
l
I 6
ll.
6
^U : :gE~
1 G.:g0 f
1 o
oOE
.g$m.
6 1
eg dw * : EE a
P e:.EE I
$,E E
e e -
s-eey s
d x uwh re n
i ebot eh.
o v
lI kt t p
o r nr s
s r o i o e
l e
pf o wt u a
R o.t q
h h
nO e
O ot cd R t r
R t nsoeodI E
e id e I
L.
m t
t pos v et nit r e nmt f
or o
eu e
noe nq dt f t n
t el nooun ens t
o n
r sit i
ud e
t t
t n
eh i
o na l t e n a
a u
c ol b
i c
g t w S
la sn sio o o E
v
,h i er t
I E
'O nre t
C Ci uvrn d
N A
Lasieaee E
M I r or vl r e
[
E Lt pd epan C
F 1
F.W t
G A
/
N e5 :gu N
I T
N 5 :g 5
C o E l M
f tl C oA e
)
C N
s Ei O
8 R
I 1
V c O
T I r F T e)
C n
Csd A
e E
(
t L E E 't R
l U
1 D R6 n e
O8 o s
C 3E C 9 (C n
O H
o E
1 EC p
G LS s
G N
B
.C e
R 3
A - IR1 O R
E T
E L
I N
O U y O QrG R
e I
R E.
e E a T R u E 8
S A
rL T
Sb S
A e EF R
3Q
.S"M R
E A
A W
e3 C::u g C
R O R O
2~U::Cg A
P RAE n
nned eel C
o oah evza U
i i ct siir N
t t
uer e c
ao con M
A uhf eeh e A
l c wor rt g l
e a
e u
E v
vg v
a RO en s i d e
i l
t s rl h
i l d eD unt i
c S
e c
oa or x
h c r
oa s
r e
s h g u
f o
C ce B
oo sr n nh r
i ow o
rd
.i s
f o e f n at s
eG age n
ira unc a
o d
uP cix r
i e
s ad e t
t s
o vr pc ea a
u d
nxi eel gn.
e n
e e b l r is e
rb u o C
m e
epo A
mo vt z hgeP i
c oil cnr r
nrasiuc e
D R
or nsi eh e iol C
s vt n r a pb A
ua ueor xu s
R Bh a gf t ep 4
5i" R
3gw
.o 5*
1 N
l l
I D
I C "
5g-f aS..h0 o
uS" d.
$s.
I eg a
P 4'.;
c
' Q~
,4
=cg G
esno p
se R
O REL.
f o
no i
sau la SE v
I E
C N
A E
M I
E C
F I
F ED GN 80.-
u I
T N
= 3 o-C O E
I R T R
C Y
O A eT
)
C I
N s
Ei L O
R I
O V c I
C T
I r F
A C
T e F
A C s E
(
EE L
S R
2 U R6 N e
D O8 O s
3 E I
n C9 H
T o
1 F. C G A
p LS N
,E e
R s
B I 3 A - R1 P R
T O
I O U y O
N QrY R
I C
E E a T R uN L
A E
r T Sb G S
R A e EF E R
M
^d%-
R E
E A
W It=
0 g O R O sg..hg F
O RA E.
n CI o
U i
N tc M
A AH e
E v
R i
O t
H c
S e
rro C
ro f
n s
o n
i o
t i
a t
d a
n d
e n
m e
um m
o m
c o
e c
R er C
e A
k R
I 3g oN
1 i
a ", *
- aR e-I G w," ~P0 f
o o
I o 3u4 1.* $e.
eg a
P [ *
- 1*"
c
[**
"3j4
- " E=E esnop
~
se R
O RE L.
l' o no i
tau l
S a
E v
I E
CN A
E M
I E
CI F
F ED
," o G
N co3*nSu
'I T
N eg1oA C O E
I R
T R C O
)
A e C
N s
O Ei R
E I
O V c C T
I r F
I C
T e F
A Cs E
F
(
EE L
O R
U e
3 D)R6 A s
8 3 E091 A i
E n
H R
u EC LS G o
s N
,N e
5 I 3 A -
E R
R1 T
V I
N A
O O U yL QrI R
T E aK E
I R uO L
A rO T
R Sb S
B A e EF
~ aS R
R E
A W
o3,u" gu g O R E* xu" gc3 P
O R
AI n
CI o
U i
N tc M
A AH e
E v
R i
O t
H c
S er ro C
ro f
n s
o n
i o
t i
a t
d a
n d
e n
m e
as m
o m
c o
e c
R er CA o
R N
u8 I."
$M$n
.o N
I
e s
TABLE 3.4 SHOREHAM NUCl. EAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE POR CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise EMERCENCY NEWS CENTER Page I 'of 4 J.~
s.3
., $ v
'U C U "3,d c
wo uw u
x
- 0.
3"l cou
=u M
E**
13 ;
E%
q : "s "c
353 I t" iii it slo.
RAC Recosusendation for Corrective Action
} g y.
no Respunse (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of I.ERO Response Ec u
..$ 0 E e
1 C.4. 3, insufficient copying capabilities at D
Copying machin's in 8/l/86 The plan has been modified to 1
I e
C.4.c the ENC resulted in delays in the the ENC are being creato an addittoaal position, distribution of information.
These evaluated for upgrade LERO Spokesperson, and addt-delays affected the following two (2) and replacement as tional staf f have been assigned areas necessary.
to assure better coordination of information in the ENC.
The Hard copies of EBS messages were not in order to expedite 6/19/86 LERO spokesperson is respons-provided to the media in a timely dissemination of in-ible for coordinating ' the re-manner.
formation, procedures lease of information working in have been revised.
conjunction with the County a Rumor control personnel were not Essential emergency Executive or his designee, if able to answer questions received information will be he chooses to participate. The from the public because they were put in summary form LERO spokesperson will repre-not given accurate up-to-date status and simultaneously sent 1.ERO at press conferences.
reports.
transmitted via com-Press releases are to be dis-puter to the ENC and talbuted to utilit y, government LERO should make provisions for tell-all rumor control and media personnel at the ENC.
able and rapid equipment to reproduce, locations.
In hard copy, all apprope late messages As provided in OPir 3.8.1, Sec.
for distribution to the ENC staff.
5.2.4, changes in important emergency information will be electronically transmitted to Rumor Control District offices and call boards via TSO print-out (also see OPir 3.8.l. Sec.
5.3.4).
I
4
" O e 3a$$e
' G w,: y0 e
fo otue q.* $a 2
eg
==
a P
v
,a* e [
c". = EI a 2ea=E e
eyS eetf ee s
h t Bhh noh u n
t i Et t e t s o
l m
s p
sps,i i
s g
n eie a b
e n
i a
t ui i e R
i pf eq p d s t
a o sl e o ei O
s c s p c mc R
u em r
E t
r os e.
d e L
ay pnpci rh xe v
f e o o h
et Ot at a
o c
eC h
su t
hL oiq t
n ut t
If g h e o
d b Lo n td i
t ri s
i a
t aro!
eon t
a a
ht t d
u s
ni gti tt ov a s
i s ed S
l i
a fdsnio E
v o
eUt r se s
g ap e nt I
E o
a u
n oa C
Ck s
.l pr N
A L crsCarS s E
M I aoeN voB es I
E Ll f mE ef E ri C
F I
FED
,;o GN eot3n$u I
ng1oA.
TC No E
i K
)
T R
C d
O
)
s 't A
e N
C Ei n O
R o
IT O V crC I
F C
Te(
A E. C x
{
EE R
l R
- 4. lIMR6 E e
O8 T s
3El C9 o
N n
i E
i C 1 C p
G l S s
N
,S e
B 1
A - IR1 W R
T E
I N
N O
O U y R
Qr I
Y E
E a T R uC L
A rN T
E Sb S
G A e R
2yg~ a0U<
R EF E
R E
M A
W E
e3. a u * *0 g O
3*muE*"5 j R
P O RA E.
I n
C o
U N
i tc M
A A
H e
E v
R i
O t
H c
S erro C
ro f
no i
ta dnenumoce R
CAR d
't uo !."
n gel o
S C
o N
I
J h*
t D
C# 3,Rgg-4
=
8,,* g0 e
fo I
3 nS " <,*.e a.
e g
=
a P
o"w*aS' C
Q.uE7k A
o2oS2 e
dd no.fk eL-neat eocsC u sn at l u
auEl o
s p s
r a
p o
s st e v
po yi s h ee s
N eot h e
e s
r R
y a
nt t
s e
e ab see d
b i
O l
s s vpn c
f R
p
.ei iaa r
E s omc ct m od e t oerc h
l x L,
i d
on e eZt s ue f
er sf ra o
s o
r ef Epe h e ag e
n d
n e n sr l ee u
r o
e si s
as vd t
a d
i t
n nuir u df i
s re h
ol t a f
t aipco a
e ai t
u g or s t
eB a l
gbbn eidf u
S a
ossd nf t
v s
E s eis ud a a sa E
uh se a
u I
C t ti r s
t d N
A ea vd eeRd ae E
M ht nedhhA nt t E
TsiraTt P aS a I
C F
I F
ED 6
8
.oE
/
G
)
N d
,o 0e %gu l
/
I
't u2a5g 9
T N C O n
E o
I K
C T
R
(
- d n C
)
O A e t ni C
N d a s R O
Ei d
R E
I l C O
T T
a V c l N r
C siE F ITe A
yw N
C sE E EE C
(
d a e
L el sh R
e S
- 4. U R6 t pd t D)
W s
8 ssr 3E09 E n
l N
o eia o gd ot i
1 EC p
g b
G s
LS N
Y u
d B
,C R
l sd e
I3 s
e A - R1 N T
E aui IU yG O
nt v N
R R
eoao O Qr I
E E
hit r E a L
Tt sp T R uM A
rE T Sb S
A e
^bdw tS EF e
R R
E A
A W
IG,gu g C
R O R aO gg,QGg A
P O
R A.fl n
gga e
s C
o nne v
L I ir i
C U
i f wa t
E N
t c
eo c
M A
il e
A n
s.
l rl t
e en l
e b o o
d o E
v f
r
! i R
i a
n p
wt O
l t
i c
ei oa i
d h sy r r S
e eT m
d s k a pa rr er cw l
o t e ah hc e
r t c
. st e
C h
or t a d
t i
r npo p
h t
p h
wf o
n e e
o e
c f
i i
er m
cb i
n i
h u d s r e o
s o
wl f
y t
p a m i
fd oi t
a ul a
su e pd bt l
d p
a n nol ih b ma s r n
s e
i i
ui s
a e
Z s e
m d
s t
n sh s
i P
r s v E o t
o d
t c
n ey i
s e
a w R
lay t
d l
nc n
s mpt A a A a C
p os s A
a oia R
Mrd e b.
o a"IO" l.
J 3gi S
.o N
2 1
4 C
- :oEo f
e0 o
a.s.
I
.e< 0:.$m.
4 eg a
P
- * :U
.%:.I A
31:M on t) a
- efd ent e e
s dt oscsi esf erooh n
e sieev di at uint o
i rdrg act ast p
f
,e ra r s una s emio s
i4 p osd e
l r
e d
s rcs e s x0a t
n e1 vo o s e e e v R
o 4. k m
b mi o
Pet f t
f O
5 o m e
nf o
i R
pe c
e ee an i
t E
n S m Se hf b s r e a
sB r t o c
i d v L.
e eE e
i d c i
bcOfi(
gl r s eg f
o eRf p n
fi snue u g
SE ao e
Lt c se d siox o a
s eb m o enh e e n
s s
n y
o a
s e
mri s s
a l
i h
.e d
a t
d a e
e r
r mt
- l. h a ees d rCr t
t n
aT N u a
vy n
a l
n 8. t x
e h eas a
Et eS t u
l a
e rh u
B r l
3 eve O
y S
a l
ef E e.
E v
p r at S
pl I
E ih ushT eeh va C
P u b sc t ut at mdi N
A e1 q ieie eas aoad E
M hP eor rhh h ust thrne t pwt T qi aatf im I
E T. O r t C
F I
F ED 6
8
.:a
/
G
)
3 N
d
- rO
.:1e."
/
I T
't 9
N e
C n
O E
o I
u C
t T uC st d
(
)
OA e soee N
ent t s R O
r as Ei R
E IT d
p O V c po mo T
F[ r N
C T e E
A d
C x yh ee EEE C
(
l R c ctb i
- 4. u R6 S e
n e
h D
W s
e l
O8 w el.
E E
n g
3 l C9 C
N o
r
,dl N E. a G 1
p e
i N
,Y s
ms wE l
S B
C e
een I3 A -
N R
si e
R1 T
E aa
,h IU yG O
et l t NO Qr R
el na R
I E
E h eoin a
T M
L Ts crI R u A
E r
T Sb S
A e EF
^n5* se R
v R
A E A W
I"
- :U g C
R O R O
h UE :'* }
A P
RAEL n
t'd d n.nd s C
o a eeenil a h nk eo uw U
i N
t t irbi d o
hh c
aa s e M
A t m ut sc A
s ef i
n e
s H
e goy vn os h E
v a cl aops w R
i h c s
r e
O t
n s s a s r H
c S
e es ed eepo i
mel l l g t
rr r cub a ea o
S p( oish m.
C B
h ss t r E
nss e c
e oi r
o om f
h l
o i
p ynb f t t
S b f
o t
iu a a B
p n
omhd E et o
s rti t
s a e e
o o i
vf uh h i
t f) ao t
t a
pd n d
oei n r
n cd o
yo sol t
i o e
i ef n e
d v st t i ot s
r o ue p
s r ol oC o
a na peed cN c
h e
nd e Ei c R
a t
ad eer td t a C
mrt rir eno A
oexomah or R
S wef oHt cb R
,ala
/N HMs o
N 3
I r
,l II
t I
-" 33agEH I
a C." s.y0 fo 1
I
- Uud 1."km.
e e
g a
P i*.1?o[
".. n%l, eI A
1m e
ssOenl re,wt s
niCh eaeh rea n
ohLt enkTen o
itI b or v
d p
L io e
e t
s a
t w wet e
t oha c
i R
a i s eh sd ht u O
sht ad y l
f ieT h ac a
. ;e o f
R dr n
v E
s e
od e
L.
md s
egnt a
a emcro us e.
b e f
.t aaei qs n
o a
arl mt ee s
l ecgpec n
pouio ad ndi ael c o
t sd r v ur i
o snpof i
oe n ii t o s
h s t
t a
ei c se u
ey v
e l
r r e e gd s i e f ge S
a aassneit sf nr E
v siniiscn eiu E
esconf aeo nt I
C r e r pi i h t p i u N
A ecesad poseaf E
M h eseromreh r E
T ; es t meprt t a I
C F
I F
ED 6
8
.:o G
/
N eo0* a1" l
/
IT N w1Eo1 9
Cl E i l
R T R
sol n C
)
O A e l t ao A
C E
N s
O a
ni R
R A
I i
ot Ei r
ia V c T
O L r ed ti F
G C
eid Te A
t N
s Cx a
d a E EE mi d r I
(
L C
v a
I R
e e
y A
- 5. !
M R6 3E U8 T s
"r nr S
n ot C9 o
e H
1 N
p m
EC G
s e
LS O
gb si N
.S e
n eis B
3 A
I R
R R1 i
d so T
E n i ad N
F O
I U y il vh O
F R
al o pd Qr E
ri r mn E
I E a L
Twpea T R uJ A
r T
T Sb S
R A e EF O 3,5~ aS}*
R P
R A
E A
.5 =* yu g C
W R
O R s" xuE%-
A P
O RAEL n
d - ed) -
C o
ayh eS o fu et t nI r i
t t
r n i( P c
ena N
A vir n A
o e t eO H
e t
sg eR E
v net E.
R i
d eib f i 0l t
ehk i
i c
t t rdf S
e c
ol n
r egwu r
l n o yi o
C gi shr er as e nuw vd r
d s ee o
b er f
r eh esi e m vD r n
v sir c i
o i
rDs t e i
r D
e t
t D
d a
yu r
nnsi d
saiu e ne u
mB h sa m
Bt t
a)l m
5l o
) D7 A d ss c
1 a
R(
ee e
(
e R
D t r e.r uu C
eswZ nd A
nit P oie R
Ohf Et mc
- a. b.
33 w"I.sW BMS KK e
o l
I s
l l
l ltl ll
TARLE 3.6 SHOREHAM NUCl. EAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise
/ age 3 of 19 FATCHOGUE STACING AREA u
^0
.O 8 I ^d
- ~,
US*
mt wo
< =
oud c..
o 1%1 Ba E**
124 Ml ygg 2*%
%5o osa
=gg
% "s cua gg No.
RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action gg LERO Response ( ACTION)
FEMA Evaluat ion of,LERO Response Ec g0E u
.M
- 4
.I J.9, Bus drivers were not dispatched until ARCA There is no require-N/A FEMA and the RAC have reviewed g
g ment to-dispatch bus additional information supplied J.10.g two (2) hours after receipt of the Site drivers within two by LILCO regarding this issue Area Emergency ECL declaration.
hours of a Site Area and have changed the original (t) An additional area should be Emergency.
The dis-rating in the report from a established for the distribution patch of bus drivers Deficiency to an Area Requiring of destaetry to reduce Bus Driver was within the times Corrective Action.
As dis-detailed in the LERO cussed in the exercise report, processing time.
plan.
See analysis of the delays in dispatching bus (2) Additional trained staf f should be
- dispatch, Attachment drivers were due to issuing provided to the Bus Dispatcher to 2.
dosimetry and to delays in briefing the number of per-assist him in deploying over three
- sonnel, bus drivers and hundred (300) drivers and Transfer transfer point coordinators, Point Coordinators who are prior to dispatching.
FEMA deployed from the Patchogue recognizes that there is no Staging Area.
requirement within the plan to dispatch bus drivers from the Staging Area within two (2) hours of a Site Area Emergency.
FEMA also recognizes that step 5.3.4 of OPir 3.6.4 requires the Bus Coordinator (at the LERO EOC), as directed by the
+
Transportation Support Coor-dinator, to begin implementa-tion of bus operations at the Site Area Emergency; and that the first buses are to be dis-patched from the Transfer Points no sooner than one (1) l hour atter tlwe I
I 9
E $.-
C" 1
aS 5H{0 fo 2
,m.
c*."
e e
g a
~, *
,5iE P
'Q~5iE
~
- bi e
e-sedt e
,gth - nest t emeeeenn td nmd nat sor eeih obbht iisoeioe s
s a h e o h 4. i h i h
r t eh int rr iet t nt o
et s
,t n
t wdd wu f
l t D
t sf t
t o
Dr t
s
- 6. f i
u e
e o
r
! mpi e d m o r
p A
i s t
a t
r s et t omw s
e e
wro msimt e
t s hmr m3ir 'g ded a e va s s se u
aud o a R
a ugt mo o rr n
s bi pn u rm ehr f c srb c n e uB niot rr i
wt e m s ef pal cia c
w ca i
f i y
i a
t y niv s P rf re r o v
eh O
aeg nn H
i sc ou el ud a
i R
vha ui O oiut v ehf t rsut r
t o eht r D(
E t
d rqe e f
st nd aba r mTn o
L.
et rd e ek S
e
.e e
p i
oee v
c s e
o a
f o
e oh e-ya e e e nm rt s t
r eC o
t rh ef C cs l ps et ag sAaisn as se m
e tl o t()dr uh e l d hd t o ur i
u
. put t
b nid B A a
n e bt l pu t
esp n
n v
b t
n i t e
np
- 8. a p r p
j r
goo oaboa o
o ti i
a oee m
e f n pui ogn i
w as is i
g i
t n
oie5 sr vhf oeh oi sf o
c rr P
t a
g aca) y ni r
r pi T och t s a
H) o ePd A5 e r
t i
de vsn(slerh an l
d s pc u
n 'A h a n
( snr ved yo el r t
e oe rt ect at iMcS t b e rc S
a e. r e aeygnir s yd n
Et i af ps eaf t S
mce rtf d no r a E
v hF a dl sr h usa E
mih ssaiid ur i
C ol c i negt ybt eht p
eini cqnp I
N A
cbt esar acse eel t r s epaa eel t eas e E
M euar s rl t e uh mhbi osih x vrhhl ad rih I
E r ppaaTaSsbt ait awfidt eat t t apaTd t C
F i
F E
D 5"
CN E
tu I
T N
= kI C O E
I R T R C
)
O A e C
N s
O Ei R
A IT V cE O I r F
R C
Te CxA A
E EE
(
L G
R iI N
e
- f. I O8 MR6 I
s 3 t C9 C n
E A
o i
1 EC G T
p LS S
s N,
B e
t 3 E
R A -
t T
t 1 U
lU yC O
NO Qrio R
E al E.
I T
C 1
H u A
rTA T Sb S A e P
EF R
^d R
E A
W Ia!5 g n8c 5g O R P O RA E.
l n
C io UN t
c H
A AH e
E v
R i
O t
i c
l S
e rro C
ro f
no i
ta dness aoce R
e C
A R
d
't n
5 o
C 0
0 I
3 1
8 i
3'
!{f*
I -
s 9
-
- ROE-1 o.:sE0 fo
- to4 4:.$a.
3 eg a
P i. I:*[
.%:*E
- 3..cE
- U e
Pre- - esl syef rf o,,sf eo-ge-
. eef ed o
I ed roueiech ooot enioht rnh a yh l os e t
sn Ph aeC s st t nt f
t oh t
oit rctb i v Ot mt s unue at T1 og an a
cl_
o u
t t p eC af l ewl er o p
r e
ib ungt 6 s s t
e ocgoises s
n ir edS m 1 e n s
erl aux eT u
d o a8 e
me tS e
a a
f n e s m
s t k h ).5 o
eldel v er r
i R
f oA v
pn i
o rl moa n
t g
M t
El e
crt 6 u s pa Ef o i e
e u
t E at a O
ny eeud eou8 n ng qr rYo9 o qe i n
k s
R a
uot eR t o
ea s i t aF a naeii S
i E.
c m cn s e
1 r
a rp at on z mi n s a
ePe e o pR h D w t
uh ou eoi h
8 l.
r,
r r
t i a oOv w
s T
e
,c l c rnl t
E p
Ar Nf eh a
A r
- 5. d f C t
f Sc a a n e i
m
,o1 r
e e o
c v ms dt o enL i
e n d
siI ei oe ep etd s 5
i dt ssn ey roh oE got eiu/d r a n
a Lh t f s ntd d n a
n et wl e
d s
o B
t nio( rait i i n a p
n wb b
, a f y s
aSt i
rn a
o my e
o oS O l
i n
l o
ob n
F ou T er P
st o
- 4. fot aE e. s ) l hot R
a t
r a
u i
a oTr enc naC i
c a 6. r t
u S
l t
eh ri er sr L
egw_
h wO og i
t a
c sl ot u
t t oE eD t
reef
(
cn E
v e. i b t ce o siokh 3
n et osf o,
ri n
I E
S) s a auh h srl t k
'O s r o do gct us e
une a yld nrt r
C
- 4. l ieit e
GCi ef ecP aeab nncnoiu a aand s et sRL mtfdt I nrn aonasas 6 N
A E
M 6
y nvir nonf aEI d nunasP aiif ri el er s n b3 aamoit oawLLAIS adiOMddoTt H prt i u I
E C
F I
F ED
.a G
N
=o
- eO" I
N s,:Ez o T
n C O ER I T
R C
)
O A e C
N s
O Ei R
A O
E I
V c T
I r F
R C
T e CxA A
EEE
(
G
'e tt R
- b. D N
i R 6 I
s O8 C9 G n
3E A
o H -
1 EC G T
p LS N
,S s
B e
3 A - IR1 E R
T U
I N
C O
U y O Qr o R
H E
I E a T
C L
R u A
T r
T Sb A S A e P 3,Q~ se EF R
w R
E A M
- 3.. o * :Ug s soE:*j
(
R P
O RAI n
CI o
U i
N t
A
'r M
H E
v R
i O
t H
c S
erro C
ro f
no i
ta dne ma soce R
CAR d
't n
o=la o
C
.e e
1 s
l rl l!
lI' l'
fj
b I
~
9 C".::ef,-
"- 3: oE
^
1 f
o o*.=4 : :. $ a.
4 eg a
uP.. ::*
P n
.::*E ec :d e
d red eegse s
negehh nnr n
ad rrt Ti ou o
nai nit p
ul u it u s
aaf qm.rc s
e y
e o R
gn e r ti a r
ra f
t h f e it i
O et a rd d a f
R m
r A n o E
e t
i e
a md L,
s vd r
o b o i eg e
t t
f d
rh nf a
o d c i on u
f t
g a
n yo s a
l o
l o sp a l
t spa i
e niu sS s v
rb t
m o i
e e
a i ia d
n e e.
u t
nf ee tu eo uv sbe S
la b c gi e s
e h di E
v eis rb ot t
I E
r r e
h c l c C
ut b
c e ur N
A s st m t f oe E
M sit uoaf nh x I
E ad ant P eise C
F I
F E
D
)
G d
N
't c*0:ro" I
TC N n
- 2:e.
O o
e E
C I
R
(
T R
C O A e
)
C A
N s E O
Ei R
R I
V c O
A T
I r F
C T
e C xG A
lEEE N
(
I RR6 C e
- 6. D U
A s
O8 3E C9 T n
EC 1 S o
H LS G p
N
.E s
B I 3 U e
A - R1 )
R C
T I
K N
O U y O QrO R
T I
I E a T
A R u I
A rP T
Sb S
A e EF R
3Q se w
R E
A W
3o=::U g O R O
a~ s=::d}
P RA E
I n
C o
U i
N tc M
A AH e
E v
R i
O t
H c
S erro C
ru f
no i
ta dne masoce R
CA R
d
'tn "a!c o
C gns
.o ep i
s b
W4 9
U.:%g$-
1 U ~
- 3,0 f
1 o
S%
3.ygs.,
5 9
eg a
n* 3a7o C P
,t$. 4 A
i5.3a;m e
d eedP s en-s nh chi sh au n
at i iP eTll o
f gor pa p
f a d
v yf Ot nd e.
s e
o Si a e
e t
R t
se s i
c d
.ebi r
e O
u ni u eyeh c
R or g l ut r
i c
f s
d e E.
eit o e
l s
i s
x 1
st h
t u
ai d ai e
sbc o u oh e f o f
ta mq o
s r r! eP ee n
o! u n d s u
o f t g e ai sst uoOe snu i
c hRb eof t
r a
s c E.
oe et a ni u
eyt1 e x
l rca vt va e
S a
unP a
ict eh ti a E
v d e h
I E
ego 1
cf C
c r C. t a seid N
A oet e 7. h f ot if d e E
N rnisr t ems I
E P eLaA4 C
F I
F ED 6
8
)
- S G
d
/
N l
't c %Igu
/
I 9
T n
I3Ig N
C O o
E C
I R
(
T R
eow C
O A e bt o
)
C A
N l
s O
E f
Ei R
R I
8 V c O
A T
l I r F
C l
T e
.l G
A i
E. C x N
(
wva EE eu I
l R
- 6. iMR6 C e
Rt A
s c
l 3 EI O8 n
1 n e
a C9 T H
S o
n e
EC p
- 7. i n
1 G
N
.E s
eo LS 4
B U
e dt s I 3 C
R ear A - R1 0
sce T
I N
1 O
Pii p U y1 O
C R
I vd Qr T
E P enf I
E a T
A L
O rio R u A
P r
T Sb S
A e R
_dq pSy EP R
E A
A W
3 * $u g C
R O R s~02Ogg A
P O
RA E.
l n
ynf ynnyn1 t et l iol oil a aue C
o
- 7. h ge li i
na l
al l N
t oMea e (M a P t or c
d u u
4 ht n
cS H
A it t e o
A e sc chP et eh a
gatI t a H
e h
n aPn E
v t
e t
e i
P i
R i
h ooc a
u et d m i
O t
en eH et c
l H
c
,dnh t be n i t S
e a
v a susrni t r
h e
r o Ar ab yoo h.
o t
t w sii rt g t
C nn e
rt oe n
eeh est t i
i s sl st epe nh d ro eik o
h ug eg l
f n e p t snd ui i
oh o e o
f cCTrfuo e
u i
e n p
e e csorb n
c i th o
cb pae e n d v t
i e
t rh.sdi o e e s
e h
a t t d
n giiSt c r rat nh s u
ae n
en t
d ro e
8 o
s ee At i
s d
h nrbl s
7 l
l rt e
e e
ao e e i o r ). e ngc 4 ncuf o s o c
t d nnn e
nnb n
t R
oa e
l oia P sr d
ed usgr I
rt eeer eeor at CA P enh sht s uh et n R
O pet ut S ud s pS e 4
R M{.".
/N ggM i
l o
2 ls
illll1l i
9
- *
- a$$
1
," ~g0 C~4 1.* }
f I
o O
6 ega P
. I"EE A
- h.. c. %' E E E"E e
d eegrsene s
nh cnish ab e n
at iip eTl s
o f gor p
i p
f a d
c s
yf Ot nd r
e o
Sia e
e t
R t
sd s i
e d
. el e r
e O
u nt u eyeh u ut oe R
c or g l
i f
s h r E
eit o e
L.
st s i
s s u h
t ai d a t
i sDc o u o
f f
u f
ta mq o
i rl eP ee n
oiu n
a d s o
f t g e ai ss uoO e snt i
c hRb eoa t
r a
s cE ni u
eytLe oe etd x
l r ca vt vae e
S a
unP a
i rt eh tf s E
v d e h
cf u I
E ego 1
t C
crc a
seit N
A oeL e 7. i f d a E
M r mI sr hf ov I
F.
PeLaA4t eme C
F I
F E
D 68 G
,:a
/
c 1
N co 0* a$ u
/
I
- &ot 9
T N C O E
I R
)
T R
C d
8 ose O A
)
e t rb s 't C
N i
Ei n O
a R
o I
V c t
O rC T
vd s IT e(
C eep F
A R s u C s E EE
(
i y
L A
v a
R
- 6. D R6 E e
et m U
,ra O8 R s
3E A
n I.
h t C9 t
t 1
o EC G G
p 7
e e
LS N
,N s
4b e d
B I
e t
e I3 C
R asr A - R1 T
A cel I
N U yT O
Pl i ni O QrS R
I l d ot I
E Pi nh t E a T
E L
Owipu R u A
rU T Sb C S
O A e EF H R
C
^aQ* s3 s
R A
E T
A
$ u**0 g C
W A
R O R P
O u E ~ 3. {
A P
RA E.
l egsrr I
n r - s1 8 ah neoi C
o ori U
i oe 77 ut inoe N
t l m t
gol h c
f e e44 c ahf t M
A c
ant p A
i l
r rt P
oS et l
e eoc PI e l
m s
E v
pf a r
e r I Ph
,e R
s t
o i
pot u i O
p r
e f
uspO ng f
t H
r c
S e
e rt o o e
r en e c h h e ep s yh e r
h oibt pcrh l
o t
et ot h h if am o.
C pT l
d e E e P
s e
nt d
r n
r el t
o o o
r e e
t o
er li f
et.i
.t h od et gt n b )3 n
ens t
n neoi di
,d ne f
o esi h e sf i oi i
ut o s uogvsf t
l a
mi ori r
n eo!cpe v a
r et nt t
ri d
ef ppo n
n i i od ro oi n
e oy y
t m
t l t eOy u
sl l
,e f ub m
r o
8b e b
R c d nt 3 c
E n o
e e t
c p
e did dLe t
e a yt el t n l
g R
O eciguc oau r
C R pnpa oaceore A
E eex ph r erh om L rge( spsA sf e R
R
.a l,w
/N gqg
.o l
3 s
l11l l
1 (ll1l i
t i
4 9
a 9
O :" r.E-s 1
.;se0 aLu f
1 gd %:.f,a.
4 o
7 e
e eg a
a *
- 1:=[
P
=%: I A
5.EE:-
d eegP s en-es nh cnI sh au n
ati iP eTl l o
f gor pa p
f a d
v se yf Ot nd e.
o Si a e
e R
t t
ses i
O r
c d
e ebi R
u niu ey ah c
i u
E c or g l
t r
f s
d L
eit o e
e st s i
s l x h
t u
ai d a i
e c
f o f
zD o u o
t r
a mq oh e i
s r l eP ee n
oiu n d s u
o f t g e ai sst uoOe snu i
c t
hRb eof r
a s
cE ni eyt L e oe u
x et a l
rca vt va e
S a
unP a
i ct E
v eh t i a d e h
E ego I
cf 1
t C
crc a
seid N
A if d e oeL e 7. h f ot E
M rmI sr I
E PeLaA4t ema C
F I
F ED 68 G
/
N g03rou t
/
I T N
,3Ee 9
C O E
I R
)
T R C d
t eC n
)
O abAi C A e 't N
Ei n O
h S
s R
o I
t d
O V c T
rC e
t C
et F f e(
A d'h a Cx E
(
t c EE l
L A
u i R
E 6.
IHR6 o
d R
u A
s nhyn l
O8 E
3 t C9 u
osbi i
1 i
G G
p EC t
LS N
.N s
a e
I e
c dh.
B I 3 C
R A -
t e
8 R1 T
A isk I
N T
O U y t rcl.
O S
R roel v Qr I
E eohi e E a T
E L
Vd cwR R u A
U r
T Sb G S Ae O EF H R
C
,dd* s."5 R
E T
A A
W A
3 t* :u g C
R O
P no~ US:-}
A R
P O R
A E.
n r.eyr Cl o
o1 hl o UN i
f tl t t
7 aa c
yun M
A d4bti A
e cd H
e E
v Pd ar kc e
o R
i I
o o
l t
Pk l
sC hi c
Oc a S
e o
l a
r t n d
e r
oieeA r
o n
bl C
f d
r ot g s e o
t rn al f
ei wf vg t d a
n ce o
t r
r (p i eS i
o ub ta o s q
e d
d e
h ee n
srd t e
a l
n m
h u
g y
a s o i s
t o
uyrh b s c
ot o s e
e sio dd R
rd e
e u
nk a C
ect ac A
h el l or R
T sAPl o R
Ela
/N Sgs
.o l
4 I
J I
9 U*h,oy
~
1 e
Uw,
0 f
I o
oOo4
,j 8
e e
g a
3"",o u
gc P
ae 4 A
,,c m
e d eegP sen-nh cnI sh au sn atii P eTll o
f gor pa p
f a d
v yf Ot nd e.
se o
Si a e
e
~
R t
i se s tc d
O r
e ebi u niu eyeh c
R or g l ut r
i E
c t
f s
d e ei o
e i
s l
L.
st sh t
u ex ai d a i
zDc o u oh e f o f
t o
a mq i
s r rl eP ee n
oiu nd s u
o f
i t g e ai sst uoO e snu c
t hRb eof r
a s
cE ni u
eyt Le oe et a x
l rca vt va e
S a
un r a
i ct v
eh ti a E
d e h
E ego cf 1
I t
seid C
crc a
N A
oeL e 7. i f d e E
M rmI sr ht ot E
P eLaA4t ema I
C F
I F
ED 6
8
)
,5
/
G d
't eoOhou 1
N
/
I 9
T N n
e' h S C
O o
E C
I R
(
T R
g-l eny C
)
O Ae nel h ot C
A N
i riti i s
O Ei d
w t l E
R R
I l
aid O V c A T
cce i
I r C
ugd oat F Te rt xG A
bn aal f e E. C N
(
i l
EE I
e u p
l R C
e fbg m
- 6. iNR6 A
s o
o I O8C9 T
.n Ad e c 3E o
ed h H
S p
as t et s 1
E. C G E
s ei st i
Bl S N
,U e
.oa r
I3 C
R a
d pn w
A - R1 T
O ye gl e IU yH O
srw N
i ii O QrC R
it e st v I
T E.
hniee ne E a Tevbd ur T R u A i
A rP T Sb S A e EF gw 3,%
R R
A E
A 3 u ug C
W R
0 R 3" wo
'gg A
F O
R A.
F.
I n
gneet - d o C
o neh rsgnt U
i i pt i aia N
t go f es c
a f
e nd H
A t eo e ed a e A
sh h h l
n H
e E
v rTt ePg t
i o
b R
i s
eh o f
e s O
t h gl
.odh H
c t uf a
l t S
e o
gru rr ohrd noone o
t niohib t odl s C
clf t
r ed ei d.
gs e sud no l t o
c f
n v b nipus a
e od oo e
n r
h e cl h p i
h d s o
t t h eir d
c s
i n
t a
ua r
t e
n
'e b ul a a
o f ga u d
e h
n d b o
e ug e
e e
t h ad m
zd p t
is a
il a en vi s
ucd o sih o
r f a dt oosi ce h c e s o
n e
R t
p dif uaet aee f
C a ers cd t a
A nriasiant R
U af eesnas R
we
/N HO o
N 5
I l11111111 l
ll
e T
TABLE 3.6 SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWEN STATION - SCHEDutE FOR C(*RECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS RCQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise PATClHX;tlE STACING AREA (Cont'd)
Page 9 of 19 a
70 sac n
O I ^A
=E
%S~
c;g 4
o.
EUS
- 1. ~ b oo um Nh
- E*
E Oh'"h "e$
n
~ ' ss ono g.
$O0 55 Iso.
RAC Recosame4.dation for Corrective Action gg LERO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of.LERO Response 4,c, j0y 6
J.9, A Bus Driver took two (2) hours and ten D
LERO's investigation 8/8/86 The plan has been revised. OPIP A
I J.10.g (10) minutes to proceed from the of the problem re-3.6.4 Sec. 5.5.83, to require staging area to the transfer point.
wealed that during the bus drivers to show their Another driver went to the wrong trans-past dritte bus dit-Dispatch Form to the Transfer fer point, and his mistake was not vers have repeatedly Point Coordinator to assure recognized by the Transfer Point Co-volunteered to go to that the drivers have reached ordinator. Yet another driver missed a the same transfer the correct location.
This ser, ment of an assigned evacuation points and bus yards.
verification of arrival at the route.
- Thus, they had not desired transfer point is also become familiar with covered in the Transfer Point (I) Bus Drivers for general population the other possible Coordinator's Procedure evacuation routes should receive locations.
LILCO will (Attachment 1 Sec. 7 of OPtr training to assure their ability run " road rallies" to 3.6.4).
to follow directions given to them have the bus drivers so they can (a) follow routes from familiarise themselves These plan modtitcations ade-the staging eres to bus garages with other bus yards quately address the exercise and then to transfer points, and and transfer points.
tesues and should be evaluated at a future exercise.
(b) follow an assigned bus route.
I In the future, emer-l (2) OPIP 3.6.4, (Pages gency preparedness 13-14) and Attachment I (Pages 10-training will force j
- 12) should be revised to require, the use of different respectively, the Bus Driver to transfer points and 5
i present, and the Transfer Point bus yards.
The Coordinator to verify. each Bus Transfer Point Coor-
)
Driver's copy of the Bus / Van Dis-dinator Procedure wilt patching Form (OPIP 3.o.4, Attach-Indicate that bus dis-pent 7 Page 62) to assure that patch forms are to be the Rus Driver has arrived at the checked upon driver's proper transfer point.
arrival, in Rav. 7.
e f
Y.
I e
9 0*.%ne 1
o S3 n f
I o.
o3. U<
- .e sn.
0 1
e eg
[
b" w: ; :? I p
P
^
5-A o12 e
,. con-
- ef tSd e s
d cit on esocBl r n
eef ii di uE uu o
iSf t
ac r
ot p
h u f
a s a r
t e
i ret y eesh sf e
s e
d t es c xgn I
t R
o u
n n edi n
m coe o
e O
t eat g i
l o o a i
R nh vd r t ew t
t i
net ea e ah oo a
t.
em rm ct nt nmt eh e
i k
era f
b ct mS f
t o o
ac rB i
s s sf t u oE t d s eein f
s o e n
st r l id n e e m
hd o
aAt r
i t
Ti e
i h
s h
d u ort a
t n
t d
gt o l
a
- 3. i o
. n a u
a f
S lu n
o n
a l
t
- 6. o s
ae t e o l
a a
l 3
hi p y cenv s E
v p
t snt t
.i eo ei I
E ee a
leef ui c
C P
dt m
t uf ct r
N A
eI,isrr eas aaa e
E M
hP0uioo h usr vt ex I
E TO1 glff Tqit eSb e C
F I
F E
D 6
8
,o %ugu G
/
N 1
/
I T
9 N
e"ea C O E
I R
)
T R C d
O A
)
s 't e
oi C
N rd Ei n O
R o
I P o V c m
O C
T I r T e(
C e
F A
d C x i e f
EEE
(
A ub 8
I R U
E e
G
- 6. D R6 R s
l.
O8 3E A
n cl v C9 H
o i
i e 1
EC G G
p f wR N
,N s
f I S B
I e
a n
3 A - IR1 G R
r ei T
A Tr I
N U yT O
ud O QrS R
ed e E aE E.
h el I
T R u l
Tcf A
U r
T SbC S A ek EFl R
C
^dd~ oS}
R E
T A
A A
IOo* :u g C
WR P
R I O aOCo2:-]
A R
A E
n r eceet on Cl o
N i
ot ish st o U
af it e i
t eif v t
t d a c
t r ad oa e M
A epr at l c
A t
l oT o
a H
e pr e
l E
v el R
m pl onh e i
o pl t u t re O
t c aA t
h H
c S
e st ee d or r
r vh et o ro at n
f eg C
h sis t n e
t i neran) ad r o
e r
t outi H mu t
o o
c F
l t
n f
n n a s
l c e
o v eeXl nC n
oieb uI ai o
d t qA
,n ar W
i o
n t
s modh( o yi a
e rf l t ct d
d o uin np n
now on e e l f e
un oh i ogc ma Ci isst i r e s
o t
t at eR 9
c ct a st am e
i cnsis m e e R
f eier r
h f rt d o o
t C
ar sit Sf e A
r oeuoB nhf R
TcdG mEi t o g
90
- = l "
1 J
J 3gs o
7 N
a TABLE 3.6 Sil0REHAM NUCIIAR POWER STATION - SCllEDULE FOR CONNECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise PATCllOCUE STACING AREA (Cont'd)
Page 11 of 19
~ ~
c QO
.3 n O O *e w; d E
OS" uu$
. =' t.
4 c.-
E"1 gc E*~
13; 4l
- E:
era c
cue s
.co
-o RAC Recosusendation for Corrective Action ggy-8.ERO Response ( ACTION)
FEMA Evaluat ion of.LERO Re sponse 4 c,
..$ 0 E e
llo.
8 J.lo.k Appropriate personnel and equipment ARCA After road crews are N/A IIRO's response Is adequate to A
1 were not dispatched to clear the dispatched to their address the issue of inappro-multiple vehicle accident simulated as field positions they priate equipment being sent to an tapediment to evacuation.
The communicate via radio respond to the impediment appropriate personnel at the Patchogue with the EOC.
The problem introduced in the exer-Staging Area should t's trained to lead Traf,fic Culdes at cine.
Plan revisions made in request more information from the LERO the Staging Area do response to deficiency (ERO EOC EOC when impediments to evacuation are not decide which I should be suffletent to en-trucks are to be dia-sure timely response to evacua-indicated.
patched to a particu-tion impediments.
Procedure lar impediment.
OPir 3.6.3, Sec.
5.5.10 has been added and now makes clear that once dispatched from their h
prestaged location to respond to an impediment problem, road crews are to be in radio con-tact with the EOC. The Road Crew Procedure (Attach. 2 of orir 3.6.3, Sec. 6, page 2 of
- 2) specifies that Road Crews are to contact the Road Logistics Coordinator at the EOC 1f problems arise.
The effectiveness and LERO worker knowledge of these procedures should be evaluated at a future exercise.
l t
iL i
e
.t I
I t
9 "now
,'u :2 0 we o-1 f
I o
c2pu4 q2.$m.
2 1
a eg
'a *7.,I::c a
P A
..cE:=
e rg. st s
eneia n
f i th o
snatd p
niu e
s aaq t
e r re a
R Ttdf u aol O
t av R
a s
E h s e
i L.
t r s
o se.
f etd eb e o
saen s
nniedi n
oif vl c o
pdii ur i
srdt oe t
e oochx a
romese u
C f
O f ge l
e S
a R
benr E
v E
i u I
E Lt nt C
nl i u N
A eil eaf E
M h oih r I
E TPwTt a "C
F l
F ED 68 G
," =
/
N l
eet' eo"
/
I 9
T N
e* a.
C O E
I R
)
T R C d
t g-yse O A e nnienh
)
s 't C
N iidh ot Ei n O
onot i R
n I
Pi m t o V c O
rC T
a c
I t
F Te(
C ree u A
tb r r C x E EE
(
ut s L
A r
s 'C R
s e 's l l
U E
e
- 6. D n
n R6 f rieiA R
s U8 s
S s 1 E A
C9 n
H o
n o w r
L EC G G
p at e
o e
N
.N s
r LS v
I3 e
Tca I.
I
. t h
B i
t G
R i!
r A - R1 T
A d r y
d IU yT O
red am NO QrS R
eot el os I
E hoal er u E a T
E L
TCmf rf b R u A
U r
T Sb GO S A e EF H R
C n
- euy.
R A
E T
A W
A e3oo* :u g C
P R
O RO a"xaE:cg A
P RA EL n
- sesl r oms-
,es C
o nuruaet onush a U
i ob eB nf roprt N
t n
w osdf ioe c
d ine t pvo s M
A e e ret an c
it n A
h reh ari gel r o
l e
t i t t NTan r aDni lE v
a n ri i i
rt pe t md c u c R
i f
st u omCo n o
e O
t ecg pu er H
c t
i e
n s Brt S
e r - n vt.bh r
eyo t
s n d an id oe ona r
vt i ehi d r o
ii t l o rt t ti l tk o C
rl p uf a u
P t oP d
i o o
gno e rO di e r
b c h
e e r mr o
eoe sB r ssr n oR n
v i f
h mR n e
i a f E.
so agn n
e 1
t a
f r
r s ri o
o d
r eh t n ot e t
e e
i t
ozt h at c r et h
i t
t auaba e n f i r
t ri a
l oy Tnr u
s at t goc a o n d
i t p
n nn rt d s nt a i
e s
ood eayr n vy i
a t t eo o o ge e e d
s iiep roi h re a r t ei o
C c ucr t
t a n f f c
ut opra ws e
rir ert o oesi R
p vonl t i c nc t t s s t ibil eat nae C
n noor aoohhairp A
I it nDl Pf t tl st s R
d.
0 aoIc l.
J gMs o
e 9
s I
l
lt U
11 I
9 0 = 3a5 c-1 g,: E$
f 1
o
- gu4
.1$a,
~
l i
eg v.,
g* c a
P A
T <".%g* 4
%cE;"
e
.- - or-s enyti u n
t ot el o
ani d h a e
p u
l et v s
qyi d e.
e ef b id e
R di o vnes at m oabi O
n r
c R
r e
pnd E
sd ol e
L, i i x
eiu e
f bt o od u
et e ahe s
zd ns r
n n i l u
i o
o l u m d
st a o a e
i p
su t
s nhx ef s
e a
u os n
e u
l r
i ea stdr v S
a pue oit E
v f t a s at r E
mii c
I C
'O t aAed N
A R es pMf e E
M 2h naEf t E
I I Tit F ea C
F I
F E
D 68
,o
/
GN cog 3n$"
l
/
I T N wo 1o5 9
C O E
I R
)
T R C d
dt r
)
O A e 't N
nt o C
s iif Ei n O
R o
I f u V c O
C T
I r C
oZ F Te(
A t P C x EEE
(
E d
A d
e t R E
e eew
- 6. JMR6 s
sh e R
l
)
8 3EO9 A n
ut i o
v t
p e
ECi 1
G GN s
sn LS r.
N.
I e
pi y
B I3 G
R a
A - R1 t
T A
m s i
I N
T O
e r
U y O Qr S R
em a
I E
h oel E a T
E L
Thbc R u A
U r;
TSbK S A et H K
C
^
~ aOy.
EF R
E A T
A A
.>tu* gU g C
WR R
P s woEOCg A
I O RAI n
- edd res tC o
ar eeir n net seoo U
i N
t owaih mi c
i nl t t
A "A
t ga h p usi n ti ll e
t ns o ir t
E v
i oei a wc R
i t sdt s
O t
sr u
d e H
c n e st ed S
e i pri sd r
et eir r
n vs ev e o
oS inuor C
n:e ri cr a rD - ape r
nv i
l o
ea oe ec f
mp n
b n
om.
d o
sid dd n.
- n el as i
yi pr u t
t f tf uio n
a d
oi ah s i
l o pspo n
it a
ap e
m m
sb t s k
m e ot
- e p
c o
cml ycd u i
c n
upt nek e
e c
i el c R
ddi ldii i ef ii ap C
saf b st A
el i ooeef R
Rl dt mrd o d.
0 ao l."
1 ggi J
s
.o 0
l 1
l l
l f
l I
I l
l
4 I
t
[
9 C" 5$nE-1 aS.$e0 f
1 o
6S= 4 e k s.
4 1
eg P
- E a
Q.
- E A
3 e
n-saoo h e's s
i nn t t c s n
io h
ii t o
i n rs c h ca p
d wr s
eot gort e
it ai e a ed t
x R
f s avp s
e lus nis n et
,pairi o
a i
d 2. P O
e u o
o dd d i
R h
l m8 r
t E
y at a L.
oogl c
v nSl t o ne i s e a
Ci m f s f
e
.i o
e f i i e
b c c e
r r
n e e t et d
be e ni od s
o S p h
s S
i re md i
o br ad c i
a c
l r t
t P
o h
ea m
nyu e a
- 5. h p
n al o x u
l n 6. t s r a
eh e i
l e
pt s S
a a
i E
v l 3 D
t f t e a
e E
p I
c ssr euer C
ru niu s quu N
A eirsass eest E
M I
E hPt urss hd s u 1 OsBTaa T aif C
F I
F ED 6
)
8 C
d
/
N
't i0
- u l
/
I Ti n
v2 o:
9 CM o
E(
C I
R
(
T tt C
)
enf es O A eA N
b af h n C Ei E O
at o s
et i
R R
IT l
t st t V cA O I r a
sa F
C l
TeG A
i c
i l Osu C x wi R s p.
E N
(
EE d
L I
R r
U G
e nE ao
- 6. D L
Pe R6 A
s i
h 3E O8 n
8 l
l C9 T c
S o
ol l t
i 1
p t ai a
EC G n
n w p
LS N
.E s
B U
e od o l s 3
A I
C R
N1 i einai T
O s st oiD IU yH O
N iii sc O QrC R
vvd res I
T E.
eed epu E
T aA 1
R rapSB R u A
P r
T Sb S A e R
^d1 a
EF R
E A
A W
- t-0 s= 'a }g
's C
R O R A
P O
RAE 4
L n
t sf sgdn o
C i
iB Bi nc puounea U
N t
r e
gi e
c n
aa s n c
M A
aoet r e
rn A
i h St l
r l
e t T e a E
v h
vm a
x O
i mc R
u ehi ot r y t
c ut Dl ra H
c a. gi f p S
e vn o w e
r s e e h.
em si r
ui ro ed ed St d t e C
el t
ad e
u oh iri t r
n t
t h
r i
v a o o
c oh m m
f e
ert t
) s l h p a
t n
a ot o
w o
0 e l
4 u o
sn i
t
( q uh e
i b
m ct a
e r "e t
i d
yr sa d
s n
t d
oph e
r
)
l m
oO o0 r upc m
f RE t4 eo u t
o (hh s a
c k L cs p
e o
r t
s R
o a eya f i t
vt paf d C
i r sea A
tf r oirt e R
I oDf DA sb g
- 9. 1 0
J U
J
.o 1 '
N 1
TABLE 3.6 SHOREHAM NUCIIAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUlHING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise page 15 of 19 PATCHOGUE STACING AREA (Cont'd) is
$UU 23
,c uw o
c. "1 uuY
- ne Au 1%
&*4 1s B*!
E 5 '$
Te5
- 3 a
ona M.
"0"3 55
$o
%i
$ 0.E
<c RAC Recosamendation for Correcti sa Action g g M" LERO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of LERO Respunse u
..s Blo.
12 K.3 The patchogue Staging Area Bus Dis-ARCA All personnel going 9/1/86 LILCO's commitment that train-A I
into the field receive ing of IAnd Traf fic Cutdes and K.4 pa tcher made repeated statements with a in.lthorn which emphasized only that a dosimetry briefing Bus Dispatchers will emphasize when they are issued the need for giving precise general population evacuation route Bus their dosimetry.
The exposure control briefings to Drivers were to call in if a reading of 35 was reached on their DRD; he did tend Traffic Culdes' field workers is adequate. The and Bus Dispatchers' effectiveness of this training nbt give the units associated with the 3 5 number nor mention the use of the training will be modi-should be evaluated at a future 0-200 mrem DRD which is supposed to fled to emphastre the exercise.
trigger the ftrat call-in at a reading need to be more pre-at or above 200 mRes.
The verbal cise with their information.
instructions given to the general popir-lation evacuation route Bus Drivers by the patchogue Bus Dispatcher over the bulthorn should be more precise to emphastre the proper use of both dostmeters and the careful reading of exposure control instructions for t
emergency workers.
I
YB 4
I
)
9 aU 3" :oE 1
C." :E0 f
I o
oTo4 %:.}
6 1
eg
- . 3:*[
a P
o" :*A A
..cE:M e
el r f -
s r oesou n
t rk e l
o st r r a
p ano sv s
h ow s e.
e pc ee e
R m
t n es O
e yaebi c
e uv c
R n qi r
r E
o e etd L
t ug e
d cl s r aeu x
o e f o e f
t pm h
o n s en e s f
e e e r
n m
a u
o t
n gt e n u i
i i l t
m shi f
a i
Tn a
m cs u
i a l
oie cgrg a
S a
E v
oun rt E
sl di
.t a
I oene C
'O i cissd N
A E
M Rd oanie E arroht f'
Lrpt pt s I
C F
I F
ED 68 G
/
N eo 0 3eo"#
l
/
I T N
=31eo 9
n C O E
I R
)
T R
C d
)
l - f dI O A l aonK s 't e
N C Ei n O
ih a
R o
I wpe V c T
mc f
O rC C
l endo I
F Te(
A a
aR C x
(
i ot D
,E EE rt r
s.
L A
U E
e e
o R
t y
- 6. D R6 s
R t
pec O8 n
a d' mh etr 3E A
ECi C9 o
mei t pe t
1 p
i s m G
G s
f N
,N gi e at LS B
I e
h g s
A -
G R
nd t 3 k1 io n
o t
T A
n m ird s 'U yT O
i ed e R
a rahd C QrS E
E a ret et n I
T E
L Tb sr oa R u A
U r
T Sb C0 S
A e EF H 3d~ : 4j w
R K C
A E
T E g C
W A
3,u* :
A S
R O R P
2
- x=E:** }
A P
O RA E.
I n
sl s - )
f C
o ee Dare50i t h o IH utCR r et 11 i
t I
o D evs(
o c
nio s
M A
rt t e
A an erd nh sGD et o n i H
e o eo r e d
i E
v R
i icP h si t uef e o t t 0
t t
a
.Bhid i
c urdt t
S e
ut e an e s
tf i c
f s
rr aysrieetd n
y u
ua i
o v
r b
l n n oe e
C na e
e orrv rr vee n
Ten erh ro o s h o no at f
Det c ot i
y t
i Rh o l yg n
aDt n d ee n t
l s a o
a u
au et hi i
pdf wc n at p ta o a od a
m p
i ai o
pe nt v d
r x nt r
n saie t o es e
l n
rh m
ar o n
m reir n epw
,y o
e b p Z r o
e vt o h a sP a i
c nict t
w ad eE s e
eir ua i
S gl t n l l s tue s t i yuur e
C esadl poenl c A
nunrnoht iie R
obi oops emmn
- a. b.
,alc 33 Bqs KK o
3 se 1
I e
I 9
^ " " 3a$$
1 Gw.
-@0 f
I o
5 Ou" 1. * }
l i
eg 6 w,
=*EE a
P A
<
- 3.'E A
- ga*E e
el r f -
s z oesou n
t rk e l
o st r r a
p a no s v s
h ow s e.
e pc ee e
t n es R
m yaebi e
c uv O
e n qi c
R r
r e et d E
o ugd cl xe L
t s
r ae u o e f o e f
t pm h
o n x en e s f
e e e r
n m
a u
o t
n gt i
i i e n u l
ohi t
m a t T n f
a m cs u
oie i a cgrg a
l S
a oun rt E
v sldi. t a E
oene I
C
'O i cis sd N
A Rd oanie E
M E arroht E
L rpt pt e I
C F
I F
ED 6
8
.4a
)
/
G d
't coo 3a$"
l N
/
I 9
T N n
e" 1oi C O o
E C
I R T
.(
R g
C
)
O A e n
C A
N s
i Ei E O
g R
R I
a V
T O
c A, I r t
C S
F T
exG A
E. CEE N
(
- 6. UI R e
I R6 C e
u.
D A
s g3 O8 i C9 T n
o1 3 E S
o h
t 1
C p
cm E. S G t
N
.E s
t e n
U e
at I 3 A - R1 C R
Pi T
I h
O a
N U yt O QrC R
ee T
E er I
E a T
A L
SA R u A
P r
T Sb S A e EF
^d5~ aS}
R R
E A
A W
.>O
- "0 g
CR 3w gg.~ 3 }
O R A
P O
RA E.
n t nw IC o
oio U
i nan N
t rk c
d T M
A i
A y
d e
H e
E v
.h sst R
i Pt Ol t
Ci s
i c
S e
Tmt it a
r i
h m r
)l t
o 2
i l
C
( noo r
ois n o
wt o
i f
t s st s ea n
tt d z o
ar l i
'i o ur sh Co ta t
e d
u h
d n
act l
u e
i s
u a
u Cef s
sf c
c o a e o
s r
d o
e i
T R
f d
w f
C aoee A
r nhh R
Tk t t
- a. b.
33 o" I sW KK 3M%
.o 4
W 1
1 1l llllll
TABLE 3.6 StiOREllAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Exercise PATCH 0 CUE STACING AREA (Cont'd)
Page 18 of 19 O
5 33 TCU
- 3 c
g E U%
55.
E.3 E.
1:1 gi as:
era s
geo a
"Um so RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action
{g}
LERO Response ( ACTION)
FENA Evaluation of.LERO Response I[
0j u
No.
15 J.10.e, The Route Alerting Driver observed ARCA See Patchogue Staging N/A LERos response is adequate.
A I
J.10.f believed he would receive KI authoriza-Area item 13.
Route The current and previous ver-tion in an EBS message. This is incon-Alert Drivers consume stons of the plan, back to Rev.
statent with OPIP 3.3.4, Attachment I,
their K1 tablet when 5 (in OPIP 3.3.4, Attachment I, item #9.
Route Alert Drivers should be they hear a General Step 9) indicate that the Route trained to know that KI authortsation E u gency declared on Alert Drivers are to self-to to be issued to them by their the radio.
See OPIP administer K1 if they hear over supervisor as specified in the LERO 3.3.4, Attach.
I, Step EBS radio that a General Emer-9.
gency has been declared. Since Plan.
the issue rolstes to training of emergency workers regarding exposure
- control, LERO's commitment to emphastaa this L
aspect in its training is responstve.
The ef fectiveness of LERO's emergency worker radiological esposure control training should be evaluated at a future exercise.
n h
i a
I I
t I
9 C* 33iEo 1
S,;t0 f
1 o
a3 t< ;if,a.
9 1
eg uc ".E i E a
P q-
%lI A
EEE e
. os,essrl t s
et rl ziseoa n
t eoi ek r o
a k rsgnr td p
u s rt a n eone s
qe onhi vwot e
et wopni ca cmi t u
R d a al ea c l
O y
rey e a e c f c rv R
E.
n ot n ue r
f et s
e r s e e s t.
gu goe i
t r pb e f
er t
s nie e x s
o ue o h m edi es mpe mnTe n
s s e x l c ti ur o
ni e
i o
i l oe f
t p
mt
.s ah x o
mc e cse a
s e u
eh g o e v 'O i l
rt gn c pt R gge S
a ni s E. l s
onr v
E id s a nI i u E
o ont s e n r 'O I
0 cia sp ii u CN A
R nagRi s d af E
M E
E. i r e E. h ef ar I
1 St rI t rort a C
F I
FED A
G
/
N
,.t 3 tu N
I T N
.:1i C O E
I R
)
T R
C d
g
)
O A e 't N
n C
s i
Ei n O
R o
I g
O rC T
a V c t
I C
F Te(
A S
C x E EE
(
L A
e R
E e
u.
- 6. U R6 s
g3 D
R O8 A
n o1 3 E C9 H
o h
E. C G 1 G p
cm N
,N s
t S t e B
I e
I 3 at A -
C R
PI H1 T
A lU yT O
a NO QrS R
ee E.
er I
E a T
E t
SA R u A
rU T
C Sb S
O A e EF H R
C dd~ 8"M R
E T
A A
W A
t-
- 5g C
S cue 5{
R O
P R
A P O RA E.
l n
tf - eeseosecsy o
ooad r eht st i sb C
i n
ziudt e
f e UN t
iusi ecdf c M
A d nrGou nd xl ax s c
ii o pCoieureC AH e
d ah x
iu oT A
ht c e t G h
nF E
v R
i s cui cs r sdi 0
P af sieco a
l t
C f sf uif s een i
c S
e T eeaef qf el r o h r rca f
d ui r
t uTxrt a n est i
r
)
o 2
s eTh r u
oG h oa C
(
o gT i t pl t pd e i t
x u c
ep ax az emd a t
r o
i o
h emim az o
w f a f
t I r oymi hep t
f s
os eI r z
at n
t s
h h
o i
r d
rl o
a eet t eh Tw n ch ud h t oa i
a xt ant t u oh r t
a nt e l
a st e
a a l k un e s dn d r o
hf A
ae
,t o i e rst e
o g
e m
ud oe a
G nf v y o d yh
.t n
s i
t a
o u
t iet e
ce c
c d gi d ti rd h
a ar ue e
i n
r r
t R
f ya o
coesne o
i h uoid i
f t mnh C
at mot dt spal d
A r uoiuynusxruf a R
Tf ct abiaietCor 4
oala K
Bg
.o 6
l 1
g I
l II
[
<ll
8t Dw a
^ U * ' ng2e 6
Cw," g0 fo 1
oUu4 ;dw gs.
4 1
e g
a P
". o 3"E[
A n*.
'E A
..cE"E e
.gyd -
s enb au n
t i el o
p and h a uir rv s
qaaee.
e erov e
R dtbi e s
a R
i O
b R
f s c
s o u r
E d e L,
t el x i
ah u e f
st t o o
ss h e e e s
sr n
ne o
eht u
no vt aat i
u pi e
ta st r
f f
e c ot A u
a l
r e f
e S
a engt v
f E
s nna s e E
uoi I
C
'O s gd N
A R ed rae E
M E
E. h net t I
1 T a pS s C
F I
F E
)
6 1
,:O 8
G
/
N co 3* "5u l
I
/
T N wl102 9
C O E
I R T R C
)
l et -
O ir ur A e C
N t upo s
O Ei us f
R A
I O
E T
n n
V c F
R C
l e i I r Te A
a l
A C x
(
ioet LEE G
rt ns l R u
N e
e n e
- 7. D R6 s
t ot I
C9 C n
ad s a O8 3 E H
A o
merl tl G
T p
i e 1
E. S C
s f pn N
,S gi o.
e n
I 3 R
d n
D i
A - R1 o
N E
O m.so T
A n
I i
ei U y R
a O yrH A. imt I
N E
re a
E a T
E L
ThSt n R u A
rV T Sb l
S A e k
EF nd%~ 8Sy R R E
A W
.f.ouEou g C
A R
O R o" wu$uOg A
P O R
AE n
d ssod s lC o
eyat eu U
i t aw t t N
t a w daa c
dl edt M
A pa nps n
A u
oiu H
e a
E v
ti r
e R
i ot h
s t
O t
na t
a m
H c
w et r
S e
s ba o hn r
a r
t o o
d wfnd r
l C
i a e u
d r
om o
e b
h o
ws et i
ms f
t e
io s
nl t p no u e e
h n
t i
at n
s t
n t
o i a
e
,h se d
s n
yw rh e
t et n m
et P
o m
h a i
o t cd t
c ie.
a e
dddd m.
R e nuerrd l i l t oor C
ircscf a A
h enoeno R
W pi prib R
sa I d" e
/
N gME
.o N
I l
l1L i1
I e
6 aU 3:oE f
G!::e0 o
1 oU% 0:.j 2
e g
a P
[7.*31:=
1:3c
.::*E A
e Pt d es-s Ii ehir n
P unt e
o Or g x
s p
cin e
t s
sesi i
e er s k s R
r at i
uo-s h
O dt nid t
R e
osl E
c1 nse L,
o ais s r 5. )3 f
e p
o f
r o
4( t f d f
od n
oP es a
o I ee nP rd n i
t oOhio o.
a i
t ut t e S
l td gt u
u ant ues a
cascbt s E
v i
aiiai ef ru I
F f 3. l i
f t qe C
ases N
A d 6. t E
M o
ridi I
E H3 atd ac C
F I
F E
6 D
8
)
/
G d
6 N
't c
- eou 2
I
/
T N 31e.
n 5
C o o
E C
i R
(
T R C e-e-et -
O A eA N
mtd ir beht b si
)
C s E O
R R
I l m d
st Ei l
l i ra ss V cA T
l O
i o
ai I r i
F C
wrf nw d
T eG A
C x
o A
E EE N
(
L I
sf h t
U C
e e
c non R
7 D ot e R6 A s
d d
.s m
t O8 3 E T
n ie a C9 Z r p
H S
o up p P e i
1 p
Gps E p u
AC G D
s i
d i
I S
N
,A e
cud e
q B
el n e n I 3 A'-
E R
i q R1 eel ag o
T H
f I
i N
R O
f -
t nihi U y O
E R
aea m ost t Qr E aV E.
rri isi u IT t
T pd 2 t awb R u 1
A R
r T
Sb S
A e EF R
3g* :w R
E A
W 3 t* :u g D
O R O
2~bE:cg P
R A
E.
l n
crg)) ed sme C
o i i n00h nnob U
i f ei13 t aar t
f hk((
ef d N
m l
c at a s
M A
r t
t t s u A
Td y
ais e o y
h l
e n
,t k ud l
nt ot E
v s
f ae i
e r R
iu O
o v viend Cd t
t H
ai eh l
l c
i i t es st e
e S
e nrs l
d c i
i r
ei e ae f
f ro m
cd pf C
ygx nyn xf on e al i gea eh l i e
n r
t r
eT i
o pgs t
v e a a )0 at r
o f
i d t w m n oet e
n s
5i e mh c
o n
( x p t
eeP os e a
s r
rA e
i gr t
eh C yp a
wt na Tt p a"
d t
s i
f a e
.h g n
e m i a
e b ot f a
t w r c n.
s ma r a e
id s
ef r age l nssgu pap o
m c
saeeend st o i
i e
t R
evet t ie sl d
e di wuugc C
et rt nna o ev A
h ur eiit rf h e S
TOab mmspot d
)
0 uls 1
J uNu o
2 N
l lll
al ll6 s
l 6
O,=4:e e
f G,,
- 2a sn.
o A
to< 2e 3
eg a
a P
D'. ".*%:.I A
<- :a:,,
e e
.d y,ssee t eat Oiib r sn auorC h
u o
usreL t
t p
qs pI n d u eie oLotl f se d
h r iau R
aet p t
o s
yc eh a O
b a cs si t O R
ic aC a
E t
rhL tl L
etI d spt a
e s e
u n ed Lni i
t s
i d n n
o o sa ei s
i n
p oit m h a i
o sh t n eegg e
s rb ua t
i i
r r n a o
la s eom oh u
Os dt e tt d.
h l
Ce nn l ee t
u s
d at s S
a Lr ei e
ai E
v I d I
E L d s u em uc C
aiq cuel r N
A e
dns mae E
M hot nnesivs E
TtIi ahat ee IC F
I FED
.;o A
G
/
N e.0 3g,u N
I T N 21 e,,
C O E
I R
)
TC d
ny-
.hd
,nl yw R
)
ot uscnnell o O A s 't e
N irgwiaohi en C Ei n O
R o
I t eeoh iwrt s V c aprl w t
d a O
rC T
I t o p
l am i C
d F Te(
A b pd
,rol h m a sr ac e e e Cx u
eO E EE
(
SOrCytlb t
L A
n o
a R
CaLt U
E e
e r
t
- 7. D R6 n
lei c
pg i
R O8 Ll C9 A n
l 3E n6 I
i t
H u
nLc c an ai8 1
r/g EC G G
p e
ya e
n LS N
,N s
v bf it u0 B
I e
a s s i
I 3 nod 3 w.
A - R1 C R
hi i t
T A
k y
aen
/om 1
IU yT O
o.
l s v
d l r N
S R
ri nse l o O Qr o P. d r
nah soasnot I
E E a T
D L
BTal Ticwuof s R u A
A r E T Sb S
H Ae R
R E
~ :,,
EF R
A E
A V
,.=::u g C
W I
R R
O R 5 su2:.}
A P
O RAEL n
nwnneo C
o e oioht U
i vr it N
t ar et t
c h al a n
M A
k nb rgi A
o aen o H
e o
sdi P E
v r s si t R
i B a a s ar O
t wpn ce H
c m o of S
e e
iCl s r
t en h
r n
ra t ie o
b r
C o
T P
r t
d o n.
o a
l
.t on f
ru eo r t o n
df c e n ti h
et o
as e
t t a i
ond v
a sc t
r a n i
a r a egbo d
T w
ul S
n s
g t
e s n n e nn m
e oi t b ee m
c iv n vr o
ct r e ae c
a a u mdhf e
c el kf R
ts l uoi C
ebdcood A
h unnh r R
TS aisB a
."I a H
BMw o
l 3
s l
1 1
I i
6 e
O
- e%! c-fo Gu,u3t$
I 4
8::o4 *." $m.
e eg a
P
,u3*ic 25 o%*j4 A
.,cE*E e
el ref e.
s zoet ob e n
irk a s
o st r us i
p anoqs c
s howee r
e pc d nd e R
m yael x v u e
c o e O
i e n h
R t
e E
o r e s
c r
L t ugn e
u s r af o e t
f t pm f
u o
n x e egf e e n
n m
eia o
t n s hn i
l Tit i
i i t
m a aa a
m cs r
u oie
. td cgrge e
S la ouns t
E v
sldi n a
I E
oeno u
C
'O i c i p s l N
A Rd oasia E
M I
E Ear reh v I rpt rt e C
F I
F E
D 6
8
)
G d
/
N
't eo0e$5u l
/
I T N n
u* o$2 9
C O
o E I (C
R T R
C l
f d1 O
)
A e l aonK C
A N
s ih a
Ei E O
wpe R
R I
O V c T
mc f
rA endo I
F C
l Te A
a aR E.C x G EE N
(
iot D r
s.
7 it I
rt t R D R6 C e
e o
t y pec O8 A s
t r
C9 T n
ad mh et 3E LS G 1 S o
mei t p H
e l
EC p
sm f e at D
s gih N
,A e
B n
g s
Il E
R dt n o
A - Rl ti O
i ed e io T
n m I
i rd N
R Uy O
E R
a zahd Qr V
I reiet n I
E a T R uI R
Tb sroa A
rR T Sb S A e EF 3,%v n3U<
R R
A E
A 2 u*'0 g C
W R
O R 3 ~ gu$'"
g A
P O R
AEL n
l sgyPl n-)
Cl io aenrI aew5 t
rt ieP rv o1 N
t e ugvOeil(
c noee ng M
A ert ne rn Al e
eie l
g S
i g s
b ee E
v D de ht e
d R
i h sa R eh d tf 0
t t ueDt i
lI c
t l S
e bh a
udf r
r r
t o a r
o e ssr h ey f
vi o
r r o
s ih sf e
C n
s R
a ov o
r r
s t e i
s e o
et ed sr a
t f
v ah eeugs ut et v o nD i
n r
c ruiriR o
d a nr nD vm iD i
i t
e e ot m s a a
h ro ure d
t f n) sb t g n
5 u n
e f
1B a
s nd nl r
u o oed(
oa-so ihi i n d c
t cdn
)
.t oi s t
e at e
aim e o
( l a e l.
l t t
R upat ui u
C epsef 9 pdd n A
n oiri od ni R
o pd A f 3 paam b.
u8Ii" 3
s K
3q%
0 4
00 l
i I
4 I
6
.15 $ 49 3.~7$
fo 1
- 3<
- 2. " $M 5
i e
e g
a P
s5.1 E
~.]5[
.",$E A
~
e el r ef -
s aoet ou n
t rk a l
o st r usa p
anoqsv s
howeee.
e pc d n e
R m
yae es e
c vbi O
i c
en R
r t
r E
o e
cd e L,
t ugn l
e x
s r af u o e o e f
t pm h
f o
n x e s
e e
e e r
n m
e u
o t
n shgt i
i i i Tnu l
t m a i f a
m c s n
u oie
.i a cgrge a l
S a
ouns rt E
v sl di nt a E
oeno I
C
'O i c i p s d N
A Rd oasie E
M E arreht E
Lr pt rt a I
C F
I F
.2 A
G
/
N E:e N
I T N
- o?k C O E
I R
)
T R C d
)
O A e 't N
A.
C s
Ei n O
S R
o I
V c O
rC T
I C
F Te(
A Cx
(
d E.E E R
A a
IU E
e e
7 D R
s h
R6 O8 3E C9 A n
r l
o e
l 1
EC G G
p v
N
.N s
i LS B
I e
R 1
A I
C R
4 R1 T
A IU yT O
m NO Qr S R
ee E
E.
et I
T aD t
Si R u A
A r
T Sb EH S A e R R
E 3a~ a3j-EF R
E V
A A
5.' "O g C
W E
R O R R
2 ~ s.0 "f A
P O
R A
E.
n se.
d IC o
ecst n U
i d nDd a N
t t erd c
urD a-M A
C e w
A f
o n
H e
cf l
E v
i i e e R
i f d gv f
O t
f niago H
c ae S
e rh r r
Tt -
e es r
d b u o
i
) d C
8 n m
( a d e r
h t
l o
t s ut h rd o f
ge nh n n
a si id o
en i
u g.
t s
e n s a
e d
h ywd iD n
ol nR t l e
l u iD l
s f u a
Cr s
of e
a t g oc
) t nc n
e 2 oeil a R
( nef ar wf n -
C od t aod A
wierii R
TdbTt m b.
I*.*
1 K
.o 88 5
1 l
l
ni' t
I; I
t O
6 C*e
- $ m..-
f aS,:t0 o
1
.U4 ai$s.
6 e
eg a
p w " no c eI A
~
gc1:m e
. os, essrl t s
et rl ai seoa n
t eot ek r o
a k rsgnrtd p
u s rt aneone s
qe onhi vwot e
et wopni ca R
d a cmi t u
al eac l
O y
rey ea e c f c rv R
n ot n ue r
E s
et f
L.
i r
s e e s egu goe t
r pb e f
er st ue nie e x s
o e
o h m edi s
mpe sse mnTe n
n x
l c i
i o
o et ur i
l oe i
p f
mt
. s ah x t
s o
mc a
e e cse e 'O i u
rh goe v
l t gn cpiR gge S
a ni sE onr s
E v
s id s a nLli u E
enr o
ont I
C
'O c i a 'O s p t i u N
A R nagRi s daf E
M Ei reEh ef er I
E LSt rLt rort a C
F I
F ED
)
,o A
G d
/
N
't
,o03eou N
I T N n
e3 1 :..s C
O o
E C
I R
T
(
R C
O
)
A eA N
A.
C sE O
S Ei R
R I
V c O
A T
I r F
C T eG A
C x
XEE N
(
d I
a t
R U
G e
e 7 D A
s h
R6 O8 3El C9 T n
r S
o e
l 1
EC G p
v LS
)I e
R s
i N
B
,A I 3 A -
E R
4 R1 T
H I
N R
O m
U y O
E R
ee Qr V
E et I
E a T
I L
Si R u A
rR T Sb S
A e R
"d$*
mj-EF R
E A
A W
I tu" ::u g C
R O R P
sue:Cg A
O R
A E
n e, nnr I
o h yoeo C
U i
t l i vf N
t eti c
r ag M
A uu s
A d
e l
t c l
e e aa er E
v t mvb u R
i a
d ee O
t l
e r
H c
up dc S
e m
nl o r
i aur t
r s
op e
h o
l d s C
b e n
r an i r
et gs o
v i r f
l 1 s eg eK s v n n
D ai i o
s r n igDi i
a t
sh n r
a d
u i
st n
Bf e I
u e
ob B
K m
l n o ag m
)
o nn o
t t
i oi c
(
e t
.i t R
sret s eoti e
~
C e gi ud g A
n nr od n R
Oiprai n.
0 w8lc 1
J ggs
.o 6
ls I
l l
,li
l!
l; l
i
+
I O. jh-f s.gks o
.e n.
i eg o
a P
._ j [
- Q_.jI
.2 j esnop se R
O RE L.
e f
o no i
tau l
S a
E v
I E
CN A
E M
I E
C F
I F
ED G
N Y
,. : j
I T
T N C O L
.. j I
E I
I C
R T
R A
C O A e F
)
C N
s Ei N O
R O
I V c O
I T
I r F Te T C
A A
E Cs EE N
(
L I
I R
U M
e
- 8. D R6 A s
O8 3E C9 T n
H N
o 1
EC G O
p LS N
,C s
B E
e I I D
R A - RI T
I NO U yR O
E Qr R
K E
I E a T
R L
R u A
rO T Sb W S A e Y
R C
^ 1.j EF R
E N
iA O _.y g E
MMR G
R I
O E
R M
A E
EL n
C o
U i
N tc M
A AH e
E v
R i
O t
H c
S erro C
ro f
.s no no i
i ta t
d a
n d
e n
m e
m m
o m
c o
e c
=
R er CA o
R N
.. j uE o
N I
e C "
- 13 cw I
fo S.w*
0 I
u0"*
I r
e o
g a
P 2"
.-]
ic Q"="
4 A
- c1 2 e
eogwye s
st ni ilb e n
i iTd e s
o v
r nt oi p
ed o i at c s
r et m
r e
is e i.r R
d n
xd x i
O ov oe o oe e t o mt re t
R r
ai pne E.
p u n p
r qo ae u 1
t r e m dt f
n ed nu o
ee t a of n
mb n c
n t
e oiea o
i C ot hs t
i mo t
t t
mt i) a a
o y w0 u
c nl t 9d S
la ninl e t
goei
( e E
v sit nit ya I
E npob at u C
'O i e s a u e l N
A R acr pdna E
M reeaiiv E. t R I
E 1
pcvne C
F i
F ED 68 G
.aa
/
N Et.t8" 1
/
I T
N
=* o?2 9
C u E
i R
T R
C l oog O A e l t t n
)
C N
s i
i Ei O
v r
R I
d o V c O
T e
ir t
F C
l T e eis R
A a
n nd C x E EE E
(
id o n L
T re eiemo I
R N
e
- 9. IAR 6 c
O8 E s
t f h e
C9 C, n
ait s
3E H
u md h
1 LS G N
p o es0 EC gm zi9 N
,O s
B I
e n
il I 3 A -
T R
i spn R1 T
P n
ami I
N U yE O
i h oh O QrC R
a pct I
E E
remci E a T R uR L
Tb eaw A
r T
Sb S
A e EF R
^d5wa3"M R
E A
A W
Itv* ~0 g C
O R R
nS s=$~"
g A
P O
RA E.
n y-rdgnrs lC o
oli eenood f
i ed giiit n i
i N
t d t nnf r ti o s
c a aioiopnc M
A r m l ct eoe e
A r
ir eicms u
H e
x e pne E
v R
i e op ysoR d
l r
l m o )0 e
)
n t
c k
t p
b e 9 o i
c n
s op e adl e
( r S
e a
r r
s t
nl h P
e oat d r
u ey r
d c nt O o
ek n i
e C
poi s s.oieR o m anE n
st riL r
,t o
e t n
)$ c )0 r o
s e
f no g(
9 ud h
n n
in o(d e e t
o siet enb i
cg h n i
a r v y
oi t
t c oi t
i i
r sd a
ctfh eF sl wd d
oi cn au e
n n oi i O
osb e
ot h n m
m w R
hl i l
a a
El sar s
r
)
eL e uc o
el 4
,h n
d s c
v a( a t enrie e
e d
c s
h oev r sirunt st i p C
gud e r nd A
nooihneens R
Ol f vti pCI a 2
.aI."
1 J
BU o
I N
l l:
l l
li
I
=
a c TABLE 3.10 SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FOR COR.ECTING DEFICIENCIES g
OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 11, 1986 Exercise CONGRECATE CARE CENTERS Page 1 of I
~X u
n Q ':
0~O O f "d
=E "S"
st 4
Ma uuQ
- t.
cww 1%)
FI
$*v
-we oo*
- 2 is.*.
- 0 SAS EE"
- pg
.303 21 E
W No.
RAC Recosusendation for Corrective Action
{b LERO Response (ACTION)
FEMA Evaluation of.LERO Response EE
$0E
.as 1
J.10.h Neither of the two (2) congregate care ARCA The Red Cross has the N/A The revised letter of agree-1 I
facitttles activated for the February responsibility for ment. App. 8, pages 8-11 to 5-13, 1986 exercise are identified in the maintaining a list of tid, appears to say that the latest subetssion of the LEko Plan.
congregate care cen-American Red Cross has not The Plan should be revised to include ters.
Since the list agreed to respond to a radio-all factittles intended for use as la revised periodt-logical emergency at Shoreham shelter factittles during a radio-cally (as particular (see lines 1-4 pages B-Ila).
logical emergency at SNPS.
Tl'ese centers become un-Page B-Ilb implies that the factittles should be included in' the available or as ne6 American Red Cross only works Itut attached to LERO's letter of ones are added) it with and through the govern-agreement with the American Red Cross.
would be inappropriate ment.
It also states thdt to include the list tr letters of aggeement between the LERO Plan.
In-the American Red Cross and stead,' App. B to Clu owners of a factitty to be used plan will be revisec as a shelter will be entered to contain a
nes into at the time of an letter of agreement incident.
This policy is un-with the Red Crost
' workable.
The new material which will state that submitted for App.
B raises the Red Cross will many questions concerning the r
maintain an up-t o-d a t.
participation of the American i
Itst of congregate Red Cross in a
Shoreham care centert and that
- incident, not only in the the list will be mad.
operation of shelters, but also available to the in connection with EOC appropriate federal participatton.
It is FEMA's j
agencies on request.
position that letters of agreement are required for all f actittles which are planned to be used in an emergency response.
I
e b
4 8
C
- n5 aw f
u.,,. ~E$
o s*. wo*,.." $ s n.
1 eg a
P
. =2*E$
Q o=*EI
~
..co*
- E es nop se R
O R
E.
I e
fo nn i
tau S
la E
v I
E CN A
E M
I E
C F
I F
ED G
., o N
C= t.. n$"
I T N
=* oaoA C O E I R
T R
C O A e
)
C N
s O
Ei R
I O V c T
I r F
C T
T e A
C. Ex L.
E
(
F L
R l
l IMR6 I e
I. I ) 8 R
s 3 E09 D n
H o
1 L
p F. C G S
A s
L N
.CI R
B I 3 e
A R1 D
T N E
O I
O U y QrM R
I E
E a T
L R u A
r T
Sb S
A e ed4m ::3U4 EF R
R EW A
,.ee660 g O R O
m=c=*-
]
P R
A E.
1 n
C o
I i
IN tc M
A AH e
E v
R i
O t
H c
S erra C
ro f
n s
o n
i o
t i
a t
d a
n d
e n
m e
m m
o m
c o
e c
R er CA o
R N
.= I."
3!g E
o ls I
l i
a I