ML20050B022

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:36, 10 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Deficiency Rept 2 Re Failure of Transamerica Delaval to Correct Violations Identified During Audits 79V-38 & 80V-39 Promptly,Due to Improper QA Program Implementation, Initially Reported on 820114.Also Reported Per Part 21
ML20050B022
Person / Time
Site: Bellefonte, 05000000, Black Fox, Hartsville, Phipps Bend, Yellow Creek
Issue date: 03/19/1982
From: Mills L
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
REF-PT21-82 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8204020507
Download: ML20050B022 (2)


Text

..

e TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut Street Tower II A 22

~~

bE March 19, 1982 m

  • ' ro ,

a l

'a -

c=

BLRD-50-438/82-08, -439/82-08 -- .

HTRD-50-518/82-05, -519/82-04, co

-520/82-05, -521/82-04 r PBRD-50-553/82-04, -554/82-04 YCRD-50-566/82-03, -567/82-03 o N ,

p  %/

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II g, ATTN: James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator p ilIQ 9 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Z 4PQ i Atlanta, Georgia 30303 IOS2a r__

ntgy f[} $7ll:tI

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

4 '

BELLEFONTE, HARTSVILLE, PHIPPS BEND, AND YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT REPORTABLE DEFICIENCY - FAILURE OF TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL TO PROMPTLY CORRECT DEFICIENCIES - BLRD-50-438/82-08, -439/82 HTRD-50-518/82-05,

-519/82-04, -520/82-05, -521/82 PBRD-50-553/82-04, -554/82 )' YCRD-50-566/82-03, -567/82-03 The subject deficiency was initially reported to R. C. Lewis, NRC-0IE, Region II on January 14, 1982 as Audit 81V-47, Deficiency No. 1. In t

compliance with paragraph 50.55(e) of 10 CFR Part 50, we are enclosing our final interim report on the subject deficiency. We consider 10 CFR ,

Part 21 applicable to this nonconformance. If you have any questions, I

please call Jim Domer at FTS 858-2725.

Very truly yours, i TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY i

t j

. C. Mil s, Man ger Nuclear Regulation and Safety Enclosure

! cc: Mr. R. C. DeYoung, Director (Enclosure) l Office of Inspection and Enforcement .

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 j

(  ;

1 OFillCIAL COPY i l

s204020507 820319 7{. g 4 y i PDR ADOCK 05000438 1 Equal Opportumty Employer S PDR

, e d

, ENCLOSURE BELLEFONTE, HARTSVILLE A AND B, PHIPPS BEND, AND

-YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANTS FAILURE OF TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL TO PROMPTLY CORRECT DEFICIENCIES 10CFR50.55(e) REPORT NO. 2 (FINAL)

BLRD-50-438/82-08, -439/82-08 HTRD-50-518/82-05, -519/82-04,

-520/82-05, -521/82-04 ~

i PBRD-50-553/82-04, -554/82-04

YCRD-50-566/82-03, -567/82-03 I

Description of Deficiency This deficiency was identified during TVA Vendor Audit 81V-47 conducted at the 4

vendor's facility December 1-3, 1981. During the review of Delaval's corrective action program, it was established that deficiencies identified during customer and internal audits are documented on corrective action request (CAR) forms. The auditor reviewed CARS written as a result of TVA audits 79V-38 (September 1979) and 80V-37 (August 1980) and Delaval internal

audit (March 1981). There was no objective evidence that followup audits were being conducted, but rather proposed corrective action was being accepted as presented. Thus, problem areas identified during these audits still existed.

i Deficiencies identified during audit 79V-38 were still uncloscable due to lack of implementation of proposed corrective action as were deficiencies

, identified during audit 80V-37. The cause of this deficiency was determined to be the failure by TransAmerica Delaval to properly implement its QA program.

Safety Implications Delaval's corrective action system is used to identify generic problems as they would relate to the product and/or QA program. The failure to verify implementation of corrective action required by the corrective action request 1 may allow deficient equipment to be manufactured and delivered to TVA for usage, thereby adversely affecting plant safety.

1 These potential equipment problems identified above address generic areas only. For random problems identified by Delaval's inspectors, inspection reports are used to resolve these. In addition, any random operational abnormalities would surface during the engine testing program. The audit team did not identify any deficiencies in these areas regarding correcting random hardware problems once identified. Where problems could exist is the generic

' type breakdown that would not be readily apparent to inspection and test personnel.

i Corrective Action 1

I TransAmerica Delaval has issued new CARS for the unresolved deficiencies t identified during audits 79V-38 and 80V-37. Implementation of the associated

[ corpective actions .s complete. The vendor will perform an internal audit by 1

March 31, 1982 to verify the effectiveness and completion of all CARS written since January 1, 1980.

i TVA will audit TransAmerica Delaval by April 30, 1982 to verify implementation of the corrective actions stated above. Annual audits will be conducted by TVA which will include assurance that CARS are properly verified _

by-the TransAmerica Delaval QA program.

1

- . . , , . , .- - - ,,..,--n , ,.,