ML20011A527

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:35, 17 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 81-016/03L-0:on 810902,required Surveillance Testing Not Performed Prior to Making Sgtts Train Inoperable.Caused by Personnel Error.Individuals Instructed on Need to Adhere to Procedures
ML20011A527
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/02/1981
From: Dunesia Clark
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20011A518 List:
References
LER-81-016-03L-04, LER-81-16-3L-4, NUDOCS 8110130516
Download: ML20011A527 (2)


Text

' '

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULAV@RY CoMOSSES (7 T7)

- LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK: l l l l } l l (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REoVIRED INFORMATION) 6 lo l*J l9 l Ill lQ l A ID l 1l@l 0 l 0 l 0 l - l 0 l 0 l 0 ] - l 0 hl 0 26 l 0 l@l UCENM4nPE l 1 Ml1 l1 l

l1 biCATbd l@

l@]

7 UCENSEE CODE 14 15 UCENSMUM6EH

[

C C%"T

[oIil 7 3 305R] l Ll@l0 l5 l 0l 0 l 0 l 215 l 4 l@l 019 l 0121311 l@l11010l21811l@

60 61 DOCKET NUM8ER 63 69 EVENT DATE 14 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES h 10I: !! On September 2, 1981, it was discovered that surveillance testing required by I t

Technical Specification 4.7.B.I.a, had not been performed prior to making each SBGTS l 10#21 1 train inoperable. The consequences of this event were minimal because each SBGTS l 10 s a l I train was subsequently demonstrated to be operable, and the actual time each train l 10#5!I l

o ,3 l l was inoperable was less than I hour.

I_.

Lo ' 71 1 I

[222J8 9l -

80 7 COMP. VALVE SYSTEV CAUSE CAUSE SU9 CODE COMPONENT CODE SU8 CODE SUBCODE CODE CODE 10!91 15 Ic l@ [ Aj@ l c l@ Iz Iz Iz lz Iz Iz l@19[z 12 33 *% _

J@ g@ 20 7 & 9 to REVISION IU E N TI AL OCCURREZE REPORT PORT NO. CODE TYPE NO.

LEA 90 EVENT YE AR

@ ?psg I8111 l-l i o 11161 Ld 1013I L' 30

] L_i 31 10 1 32 22 21 24 26 27 28 23

_ 23 HOURS 22 S B IT D FOR b h. SUPPLIE MAN F CTURER 7 zN A ON ON PL T ET lH JgQg l0lCl0l0l ] g l Nl g ] g [z l9 l9 l9 47Qt)

R 34 l35z lg 'l36z[@ 31 40 41 42 4: 44 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTi\ ACTIONS The cause of this event was persanc.el error. The individuals involved did not l li3O[}

follow approved procedures for the tes* ing involved. These individuals were l li si j l g,,,,g instructed on the need to adhere to procedures.  ;

l l i l 31 l l

li t a l l s0 7 a 9 OTHER STATUS DISCOV RY DISCOVEnv DESCRIPTION

$ %eOWER NA l l A l@l Shi f t Engineer Observation l 1

15' l l E l@' l ol 9I 6l@l ' " *

  • A2TIVITY CO TENT LOCATION Or RELEASE I REtzAsED OF RELEASE AMOUN' OF ACTIVITY NA l l1isl3 3W @ J @l 7 10 11 NA A4 l l 45 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES SUMBER TYPE DESCRIPTION NA l 12 71 l_01 O l 01@l2 z i@l _

' * * ,sRSCNNa'imu'H0ES

  • eUV3ER DESCRIPTION l

l3 !vll0l0l0lhl 7 d 3 11 12 NA 80 LOM OF OR DAVAGE TO FACILtTY TV'? D E SCRIP TION l

I1 i i l d}I'$',t NA 80 8110130516 811002 NRC M ONLY

..[,"$ PDR ADOCK 05000254 ,

S PDR g g ; ; g ; ; 9 g ; ; 9 l ::

[J i.] [ N fhl $ iPrioN@

NA 63 69 80 5 i a 3 70 D. Clark pggyg WWM1, m. IM g

l. LER NUMBER: LER/R0 81-16/03L-0 il. ICENSEE NAME: Commonwealth Edison Company quad-Cities Nuclear Power Station 111. FACILITY NAME: Unit One IV. DOCKET NUMBER: 050-254 V. EVENT DESCRIPTION:

On September 2, 1981, at 3:30 p.m., the Shi f t Digineer was informed that the Standby Gas Treatment System (SBGTS) associated with Unit One ("B" Train) had been worbed on by Maintenance. Subsequent investigation revealed that the surveillance testing required in Technical Speci fication 4.7.B.I.a had not L,rr performed prior to this maintenance. It was also determined that the "A" SBGTS train had been made inoperable on August 25, 1981, to remove a charcoal test canister, and the required testing of the "B" SBGTS train was not performed. The "A" SBGTS train had not been taken out of service prior to the canister removal. When the charcoal filter tray was renoved, thus disrupting the filter, it rendered that SBGTS train inoperable. On August 26, the "A" SBGTS train was turned on to perform the freon leak test or the charcoal aasorber bank.

The system was run for approximately li hours. On Ausast 28, "A" SBGTS train was operated for the equired 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br />, thus making "A" train operable.

On August 27, a charcoal test canister was removed from "B" SBGTS train wh i l e the "A" t ra i n was s t i l l inoperable. Due to problems with the freon test equipnent, the freon leak test was not performed until September 2, 1981. During this time, the "A" train was only operated for 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> on August 23, and 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> on August 31.

VI. PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES OF THE OCCURRENCE:

The safety implications of this occurrence were minimal. The rack con-taining the test canisters was removed for less than an hour. Although the freon leak tests were not performed immediately, the results were found te be satisfactory when they were tested. The operability tests we re also successful. Although the Technical Specification surveillance rer,airements were not rat, each train was made inoperable for less than I hour, at se:parate tin,es. Therefore, the probability of an uncontrolled gaseous release from the secondary containment was rainimal .

Vll. CAUSE:

The cause of this occurrence is personnel error. The Maintenance and Technical Staff personnel involved did not follow the procedure, which stated that an operability test on the other train should be performed.

4 VI. CAUSE (Continued)

Operating personnel were contacted prior to removing the test canisters as required in the Total Job Management Program. This also failed to initiate an outage report on the train being tested.

Vill. CORRECTIVE ACTION:

The immediate corrective action was to perform an operability test on the "B" SBGTS train. The personnel involved were reminded cf their respon-sibility to follow procedures and be aware of a Technical Specification requi rement when performing a test. This corrective action was deemed adequate to prevent re-occurrence.

t

, - ~ . - ,. -n .,,, . - , - - - - . ,- , . ,, .- . - - , - - - . - -