|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022
Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements
ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021
E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection
ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021
E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent)
ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption
ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021
E-mail from HDI: RAI Response
ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021
State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response)
ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021
Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications
ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021
E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only
ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021
Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid
ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan
ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications
ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme
ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan
ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020
E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements
ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020
Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek
ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020
Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program
ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020
Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage
ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0
ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements
ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements
ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations
NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza
ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler
ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin
ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto
ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman
ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff
ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams
ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte
ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous
ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler
ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019
for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR
ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019
NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019
Transaction
ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019
Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License
ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club)
ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption
ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019
NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation
NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019
Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application
ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019
Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration
ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019
State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application
ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019
E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002
ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019
NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation
2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
From: Stuart Feldman To: NEIMA108 Resource
Subject:
Response from "NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire" Date: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 3:40:42 PM Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Stuart Feldman (onwisconsin71@gmail.com) on Wednesday, October 09, 2019 at 15:47:38 through the IP 148.184.182.44 using the form at https://www.nrc.gov/waste/decommissioning/neima-local-comm-advisory-board-questionnaire.html and resulted in this email to neima108.resource@nrc.gov related-site: Oyster Creek Generating Station cab-question1:
cab-question2:
cab-question3:
cab-question4:
cab-question5:
cab-question6:
cab-question7:
cab-question8:
cab-question9:
cab-question10:
cab-question11:
cab-question12:
cab-question13:
cab-question14:
cab-question15:
cab-question16:
nocab-question1: The Licensee has stated in several public forums that they are not interested in forming a CAB. The State of New Jersey has formed a Safety Advisory Board to monitor the decommissioning the Oyster
Creek plant. It is not clear if the general public will be participating on the Board. The currently identified Board members are all public officials.
nocab-question2: The Licensee does not see any value in forming a CAB. The Licensee believes that they are fully capable of providing the necessary transparency to the public regarding the decommissioning activities at the site.
nocab-question3: The Licensee plans to hold Public Forums to inform the public regarding the status of the decommissioning process. The initial Public Forum was held on 9/23/2019 during which the Licensee did not provide answers or incomplete answers to a number of questions from the public. The Licensee also requested that all questions be submitted in writing which made the participants suspicious that the questions were being pre-screened before being selected.
Published articles about the meeting which highlighted the above issues were emailed to Bruce Watson on 10/4/2019 at Docket ID NRC-2019-0073-0001 NEIMA Section 108 Public Meeting Oyster Creek.
nocab-question4: There are no advantages to not having a CAB unless you are a licensee who is not interested in transparency and building trust with the local community. Also see the published articles mentioned in Item 3 for additional details on this topic.
nocab-question5: The lack of a voice for the public whose dollars were contributed to the trust fund. There will be no public communication or education; only that which is determined by the Licensee. The public also has expertise that could provide valuable insights to the Licensee during the decommissioning process. A number of excellent comments were made during the public meeting in support of local CABs including making CABs mandatory for plants undergoing decommissioning. The public could decide to opt out of forming a CAB but such a decision should not be left up to Licensee to decide. Also see the published articles mentioned in Item 3 for additional details on this topic.