|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022
Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements
ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021
E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection
ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021
E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent)
ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption
ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021
E-mail from HDI: RAI Response
ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021
State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response)
ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021
Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications
ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021
E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only
ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021
Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid
ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan
ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications
ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme
ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan
ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020
E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements
ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020
Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek
ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020
Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program
ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020
Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage
ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0
ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements
ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements
ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations
NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza
ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler
ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin
ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto
ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman
ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff
ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams
ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte
ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous
ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler
ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019
for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR
ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019
NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019
Transaction
ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019
Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License
ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club)
ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption
ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019
NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation
NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019
Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application
ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019
Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration
ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019
State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application
ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019
E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002
ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019
NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation
2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
Donnie Ashley From: Leslie Vincent on behalf of OGCMailCenter Resource Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 9:27 AM To: Edward Williamson; Brian Newell; Karl Farrar; Michael Masnik; Louise Lund; Donnie Ashley; Janice Moore
Subject:
FW: App.com Augujst 3 Oyster Creek foes appeal to force review Attachments: Oyster Creek - Docket No. 50-0219-LR Original
Message--
From: gburl @comcast.net @comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 3:54 PM To: Richard Webster; Anthony Baratta; apolonsky@morganlewis.com; bradley.fewell@exeloncorp.com; dsilverman@morganlewis.com; Roy Hawkens; Hearing Docket; john.covino@dol.lps.state.nj.us; ksutton@morganlewis.com; Mary Baty; mdonato@micheledonatoesq.com; OCAAMAIL Resource; OGCMailCenter Resource; Paul Abramson; Valerie Gray; Emily Krause; James Adler; rkuyler@morganlewis.com ýb)(6).
Cc: nirsnet@nirs.org; Janetjeff.tittel@-SierraClub.org; paul@beyondnuclear.or'g; Tauro Psturmfels@cleanwater.org; becc~a.glenn@sierraclub.org;ý b)(6) -
- b)(6) .... lacairo@njpirg.org; Dena Mottola; MattElot bubject: e: App.com Augujst 3 Oyster Creek foes appeal to force review app.com August 3, 2008,lt°rmatio ig t eo was detet-j Oyster Creek foes appeal to force NRC review of metal fatigue Ace em witthe Freedomt By MATT PAlS FOIA. Ž'0/9d?
MANAHAWKIN BUREAU Opponents of the relicensing of the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant-in Lacey have filed an appeal of a ruling that rejected their efforts to have the issue of metal fatigue of the plant's recirculation's nozzles reconsidered by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Earlier this year a coalition of groups asked the Atomic Safety Licensing Board to reopen the relicensing record to reanalyze whether five recirculation outlet nozzles on the reactor vessel will sustain too much stress over an additional 20 years. The 38-year-old plant's operating license is due to expire next April.
In a 2-1 split decision handed down July 24, the board rejected that effort.
Relicensing opponents claim Oyster Creek's use of a simplified calculation of nozzle metal fatigue falsely indicated that the amount of fatigue in the future would be acceptable. In their motion to have the issue reopened, they state that reanalysis would reveal the nozzles pose a potential safety threat.
Oyster Creek has said the original methodology used was acceptable and that any further analysis would produce similar results.
In the appeal, filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the group cites the dissenting opinion of panel member Anthony J. Baratta as grounds have the nozzle issue reopened.
Baratta stated the citizens met the standards for reopening the record to address a, "serious safety issue."
"It is something that needs to be explored. When you talk about metal fatigue of a nozzle in a reactor, that is extremely vital," said plant opponent Janet Tauro of Brick.
Tauro said the opinion of Baratta - one of two technical judges on the panel - that rejecting the motion is a "grave error," has given opponents hope.
"It buoys us very much," she said.
a
Original message -----.......------
From: Richard Webster <rwebster@easternenvironmental.org>
> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
> BEFORE THE COMMISSION
> In the Matter of
>) Docket No. 50-0219-
> LR
> AMERGEN ENERGY COMPANY, LLC
> (License Renewal for the Oyster
> Creek ) August 1,
> 2008
> Nuclear Generating
> Station)
> Please find attached Nuclear Information and Resource Service,
> Jersey Shore Nuclear Watch, Grandmothers, Mothers and More for Energy
> Safety, New Jersey Public Interest Research Group, New Jersey Sierra
> Club, and New Jersey Environmental Federation (collectively
> "Citizens") Petition for appeal of LBP-08-12, together with a Certification of Service.
> Respectfully submitted,
" Richard Webster
> Legal Director
> Eastern Environmental Law Center
> 744 Broad Street, Suite 1525
> Newark NJ, 07102
" Tel. 973 424 1166
" Fax. 973 710 4653
> rwebster(*easternenvironmental. orq 2