ML110760581

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:54, 13 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Slides- Audit of Salem'S Use of Westems Fatigue Software
ML110760581
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/2011
From: On Yee
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Gettys E, NRR/DLR, 415-4029
References
Download: ML110760581 (6)


Text

Audit of Salems use of WESTEMS Fatigue Software On Yee March 11, 2011

Identified Issues in New Reactors

- Two issues associated with WESTEMS performing NB-3600 calculations:

  • the use of the algebraic summation of three orthogonal vectors
  • methodology for stress combination related to thermal stresses t

- Configuration control in WESTEMS - the ability of users to modify intermediate data (peak and valley stresses/times) used in the analyses 2

Impact to License Renewal

  • Salem Nuclear Generating Station

- RAI 4.3-07 issued November 22, 2010

  • Requested applicant to perform benchmark calculations for two locations (pressurizer surge nozzle and 1.5 BIT safety injection nozzle)
  • Discuss applicability of identified issues 3

Impact to License Renewal

  • Audit Objectives

- Review benchmark calculations to ensure WESTEMS provides results comparable to traditional NB-3200 analysis

- Address the acceptability of analyst intervention in modifying intermediate WESTEMS data

- Address the role of the WESTEMS NB-3600 module in license renewal calculations 4

Audit Observations

  • January 18-19, 2011

- Documentation of analyst intervention was not available

- Applicant verbally justified analyst intervention for the BIT nozzle

- Confirmed that WESTEMS calculations that support the Salem LRA did not use the NB-3600 module

- Confirmed C fi d th thatt WESTEMS provides id resultslt th thatt are reasonable bl andd consistent with a traditional ASME Code Section III, NB-3200 analysis for the two locations

- Applicant agreed to revise calculations to document results, for both locations, with and without analyst intervention

  • February 8, 2011

- Revised calculations for both locations documented the results with and without analyst intervention

- Justifications for analyst intervention needs to be sufficiently specific 5

Results from Audit

  • Use of a software package to perform fatigue calculations should be consistent with ASME Code,Section III
  • Analyst intervention should be justified and documented when using a software package to perform fatigue calculations
  • WESTEMS NB-3600 module should not be used until identified issues are resolved
  • The staff has reasonable assurance that Salems use of the WESTEMS NB-3200 Design CUF module provides results that are consistent with a traditional ASME Code,Section III NB-3200 analysis
  • Options are currently being considered on how to generically communicate the concerns and results of the audit 6