ML063070190

2006/08/23-E-Mail: Questions from Fred Mogolesko 8/23/2006 9:29am

ML063070190
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	08/23/2006
From:	Mogolesko F Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Subbaratnam R NRC/NRR/ADRO
References
%dam200612, TAC MD2296
Download: ML063070190 (3)

Text

FrKent -Hcward- Q-uestions-From: To: Date:

Subject:

"Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>"Ram Subbaratnam" <RXS2@nrc.gov>

8/23/2006 9:29:11 AM Questions After reviewing the 2 recent rai's, we thought you might wan to consider a few wording changes. Please see attached.Fred to o -P ..... ..........

_ .a e '.Mail Envelope Properties (44EC581E.D52:16

40274)

Subject:

Questions Creation Date 8/23/2006 9:28:47 AM From: "Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>

Created By: fmogole@entergy.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 RXS2 (Ram Subbaratnam)

Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 129 8/23/2006 9:28:47 AM TEXT.htm 1481 Additional AMR questions-suggested wording changesil WayneandErach08212006.doc 26112 Mime.822 1 Options Expiration Date: None Priority:

Standard ReplyRequested:

No Return Notification:

None Concealed

Subject:

No Security:

Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled Additional AMR questions 1) The piping of the Reacto Isolation Cooling Syýste mis subject to flo accelerated corrosion_

.Tjhe PNPS LRA Table 3.2.1-19 -ESFand Table 3.2.1 credit the -plant-specific Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program for the management of loss of material (wall thinning).

The GALL report recommends using the ', Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Program, XI.M17, to manage wall thinning.

The'Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program provides for inspection for wall thinning every 5 years but no Monitoring and Trending activities to predict areas of high wall thinning rates or for trending of thinning as does XI.M17. Please provide justification for not providing for monitoring and trendingof wall thinnin-f-o-rRCIC piping.-Commenit fall: Suggest deleiing' the First sentence.

Sinc6e the system is alone without the first sentence.{Deleted: f(Deleted:

J{ Deleted: a I 2) In Table 3.2.1 Item 18 of the PNPS LRA, it is stated that none of the ESF system .......components arewithin the scope of theB BWR Stress Corrosion

_CCracking Program. Please provide the details that justify this statement.

-Deleted: t-Deleted: not J~1