ML18022A423

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:53, 18 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Package of Comments Urging Denial of Util Request for Exemption from Requirement to Conduct Full Participation Emergency Response Exercise,Per 10CFR50,App E
ML18022A423
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/16/1986
From: Bawden R, Brache M, Counts C, Davis V, Dowdy D, Evans C, Foster D, Franklin S, Thomas Greene, May C, Neville C, Ransdell R, Rego C, Rego P, Tiedeman M, Wilson R
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8609220043
Download: ML18022A423 (27)


Text

RE('ULA Y INFORMATION DISTR IBUTI~YBTEl'I (R IDS)ACCESSION NOR: 8609220043 DOC.DATE: 86/09/i6 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET 0 FACIL: 50-400 Shearon Hav v is Nuclear Power Plant>Unit i.Cav olina 05000400 AUTH.MANE AUT)lOR AFFILIATION REQ0>.P.Affiliation Not Assigned REQOi C.Affiliation Not Assigned EVANS>C.Affiliation Not Assigned RECIP.NANE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONi H.R.Off ice of Nuc 1eav'eactor Regulationi Direc tov (p ost 85i i25

SUBJECT:

Package of'omments urging denial of util v equest f ov exemption fv om v equiv ement to conduct full participation emergency v esponse exev c isei per iOCFR50i App E: DISTRIBUTION CODE: YE03D COP IEB RECEIVED: LTR ENCL BI ZE: TITLE: Request fov NRR Action (e.g.2.206 Petitions) i Related Cov v espondenc NOTES: Application fov permit renewal filed.05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/MANE PMR-A PD2 LA BUCNLEY, 8 Oi INTERNAL: EDO/ACB ELD/COP IEB LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NANE PMR-A PD2 PD ELD/HDBi NRR DIR COPIES LTTR ENCL EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC 03 05 NRC PDR 02 TOTAL NUF1BER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR i 1 ENCL 1 e"I fr

Dear Mr.Denton:

I,wish to urge denial of CPS,L's req8'est for exemption from the requirement, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduct a full par ticipation exercise of the Emergency Response t Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plan within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, DR goOC 86O9gg~O92aooy3 H 0500oypp PDR Mr.Harold Denton Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 (301)492-7000

Subject:

Shearon Harris nuclear plant, Carolina Power&Light, Emergency Plan

Dear Mr.Denton,

Carolina Power 6 Light Company has not conducted a'(full participation test of the present emergency plan for the Shearon Harris nuclear plant as'required by federal regulation, 10 CPR Part 50.This is most significant since Chatham County, by formal action of the Board of Commissioners, has withdrawn, from the emergency plan.Thus, no plan which could actually be implemented if the plant were to operate has been tested.In addition, citizens and officials in other counties are considering withdrawing from the present emergency plan.Clearly, any such action would further complicate this matter.At least until such time as state and local governmental participation in an emergency plan for Shearon Harris is Q fully resolved, no exemption(s) from the requirement of a full participation test within one year prior to the granting of any full power license should be considered or approved.Sincerely, N II ph

Dear Mr.Denton:

l wish to urge denial of of CPS,L's request for 10 CFR 50'xemption rom p'the requirement, under 1 E that the Company conduct a full f the Emergency Response pa'p rtici ation exercise o e H rris nuclear power plant Plan for its Shearon arri ne ear before beginning commercial within one year e before operating at o eration of the plant or e o g h five percent of rated power.greater t an i Because o e th need for changes in the evacua-I believe this exercise should d be tion plan, e i itted to conducted before the plant is permit operate at all.Sincerely, et

Dear Mr.Denton:

a~I wish to urge denial of OPAL's request for exemption from the requirement, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company coney~a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely,

Dear Mr.Denton:

I wish to urge denial of CPS,L's request for exemption from the requirement, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company condqbt a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, rr 4

Dear Hr.Denton:

l wish to urge denial gi,CPSL',request for c>50 exemp'xemption from the requirement-, under l0 CFR Appendix E, that the Company conduA a fu 1 1 participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated pover.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, 90~~Pf I~~~~

Dear"-bir.-Denton:

I wish to urge denial of CPSL's request for exemption from the requirement, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduct.ai full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely,%IS.

Dear Mr.Denton:

I wish to urge denial of CPS,L's request for exemption from the requirement;, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduct a full participation exercise:of the Emergep~Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear pbi~er plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.

Dear Hr.Denton:

I wish to urge denial of CPSL's request for exemption from the requirement, uIder 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that tg@.Company condUdt a full p articipation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, I QP, fl P)c$Qi I p'~IP~/g~~1

Dear Hr.Denton I wish to urge denial of.C(SL's request for exemption from the requiie'ment,

under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduat a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, gS r I

",Dear Mr.Denton.'ish to urge denial of C14L's request for exemption from the requirement, undy'0 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduct a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely,'E I eu&b.

Dear Mr.Denton:

t~g~~I wish to urge denia-3.of CPS,L's<request for exemption from the requirement,~3nder 10 CPR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduct a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant'ithin one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion p3.an, I believe this exercise should be conducted, before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, C)

J

Dear:

-Nr.Denton: I wish to urge denial of CPBL's request for exemption from the requirem'ent, under, 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduct&'p full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of.rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, c>It 0 ,IJ

Dear Mr.Denton:

I wish to ur'ge denial of CPSL's request for exemption from the requirement, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that ting Company conduct a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for.its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, l believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely, 5'4 J g~(4f'q~O~

Dear Hr.Denton:

I wish to urge denial o of CPSL's request for 4'CFR 50, exemption from the req re uirement, un@5'r 1 a full E that the Company conduc a u Appendix of the Emergency Response articipation exercise o e~er lant its Shearon Harris nuclear power p an Plan for x s within one year before beginning commercial f the plant or before operating at operation o e ower.reater than five percent of rated p h d for changes in the evacua-Because of the nee be I believe this exercise should tion plan, e itted to conducted before the plant is permi e operate at all.Sincerely,

~I P~

lf f4 t Dea'r-Mr.Den ton I wish to urge denial of CPSL's request for exemption from the requj.rement, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Comp'any conduct a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginn'ing commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely,

/Q

Dear Mr.Denton:

I wish to urge denial of CPS.L's request for exemption from the requirement, under l0 CFR 50, Appendix E, that the Company conduct a full participation exercise of the Emergency Response Plan for its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant within one year before beginning commercial operation of the plant or before operating at greater than five percent of rated power.Because of the need for changes in the evacua-tion plan, I believe this exercise should be conducted before the plant is permitted to operate at all.Sincerely,

~V~p