ML091811163

2009-06-DRAFT Outline Comments

ML091811163
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	06/30/2009
From:	Apger G W NRC Region 4
To:	Ameren Corp, Union Electric Co
References
50-483/09-301 50-483/09-301
Download: ML091811163 (2)

Text

Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: Callaway First Exam Date:6/19/09 Written Exam Outline (4/6/09) Comment Resolution 1 None. 2 3 4 5 Administrative JPM Outline (4/6/09) Comment Resolution 1 R&SA1: Ensure the QPTR calc is not duplicated in scenario 2, rod drop event. It is not the same. This is manual calc.

2 Re-label: RO( A1a, RA2, RA3, RA4) SRO(A1a, SA2, SA3, SA4, SA5)

Changed 3 ES-301-1 and -2 are not the correct revision: Resubmit with Rev. 9 Supplement 1 revision.

Resubmitted 4 Do the tagout review in the classroom, not the simulator.

Changed location. 5 Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (4/6/09) Comment Resolution 1 Identify the RCA in-plant. (K) is in the RCA. Form corrected 2 JPM e. is ESF. (EN) Supp. 1 forms provided. 3 Re-Label: S1, S2,-,S8, P1, P2, P3 Changed 4 5 Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (4/6/09) Comment Resolution 1 Transient and Event checklist identifies scenario 2 as the backup. Shouldn't this Scenario 4 is the backup. Will submit. Backup submitted. Forms corrected.

Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process be scenario 3?

2 T and E CL double counts the normal and reactivity evolutions for the BOP, ATC and CRS positions. There is only one or the other. The RO should get the

credit for Rx manipulation. The BOP and CRS should get NORMALS. If there is a component failure requiring a power change, then this can count as a Rx

manipulation or I/C, but not both.

Corrected 3 Scenario 1 Event 1: Critical task identified is not a critical task.

Changed 4 Scenario 2 Event 2: Critical task identified is not a critical task.

Changed 5 Scenarios 2 and 1 have a failure of a CCP to Auto start. Change this. Removed pump failure on Scenario 2 6 Scenario 2: Start at 60% and raise power to 65%.

Done 7 (ALL) We will not grade the EP declarations unless it is incorporated into an admin JPM.

OK 8 (ALL) Reactivity manip credits incorrect Corrected 9 (SB) Event 5 is not reactivity manip since this is an auto power change.

Corrected 10 ES-301-5 incorrect crediting for events A and 3 for scenario 1 and 2 Corrected 11 Scenario 3: Need to determine an actual spray valve failure amount - do not guess. Will be 30 percent.

Schedule: R5 will have to stand watch on 3 rd scenario per 1021, Rev. 9, Supp. 1. (Schedule changed)

Security Agreement: Where is the exam developer on the security agreement? (Security agreement provided)